SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 82
Download to read offline
THE CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PANEL
THE CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PANEL
ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA SYDNEY DIVISION
ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA SYDNEY DIVISION
28 August 2012
Detailing of Reinforcement
Detailing of Reinforcement
in Concrete Structures
in Concrete Structures
R.I. Gilbert
R.I. Gilbert
ž
ž Detailing
Detailing is often considered to be the
is often considered to be the preparation of working
preparation of working
drawings
drawings showing the size and location of the reinforcement in a
showing the size and location of the reinforcement in a
concrete structure.
concrete structure.
ž
ž Detailing
Detailing involves the
involves the communication
communication of the engineer
of the engineer’
’s design to the
s design to the
contractors who build the structure. It
contractors who build the structure. It involves the translation of a
involves the translation of a
good structural design from the computer or calculation pad into
good structural design from the computer or calculation pad into the
the
final structure.
final structure.
ž
ž Good detailing ensures that
Good detailing ensures that reinforcement
reinforcement
and concrete interact efficiently
and concrete interact efficiently to provide
to provide
satisfactory
satisfactory behaviour
behaviour throughout the
throughout the
complete range of loading.
complete range of loading.
ž
ž In this seminar, guidelines for
In this seminar, guidelines for successful
successful
detailing
detailing in structural elements and
in structural elements and
connections are outlined.
connections are outlined.
Introduction
Introduction:
:
ž The detailing requirements of a reinforcement bar depend on the
reasons for its inclusion in the structure.
Reasons include:
1. To carry internal tensile forces, thereby imparting strength
and ductility;
2. To control flexural cracking;
3. To control direct tension cracking in restrained structures;
4. To carry compressive forces;
5. To provide restraint to bars in compression;
6. To provide confinement to concrete in compression;
7. To limit long‐term deformation;
8. To provide protection against spalling; and
9. To provide temporary support for other reinforcement during
construction.
Guiding principles:
ž Determine location and direction of all internal forces (i.e.
establish a load path that satisfies equilibrium);
ž Use adequately anchored reinforcement wherever a tensile
force is required for equilibrium;
ž Use only ductile reinforcement (Class N or better) when the
reinforcement is required for strength;
¾ Never rely on the concrete’s ability to carry tension (it may not
exist);
ž Include adequate quantities of reinforcement for crack control;
ž Ensure steel details are practical and that steel can be fixed and
concrete can be satisfactorily placed and compacted around
complex details with adequate cover; and
ž Ensure details are economical.
Sources of tension:
1. Tension caused by bending (and axial tension):
Positive bending
Negative bending
Axial tension
Flexural tension cracks
Flexural tension cracks
Direct tension cracks
Sources of tension:
2. Tension caused by load reversals:
Cantilever beam or slab
Simple beam or slab
Impact and rebound loading
Sources of tension (ctd):
3. Tension caused by shear and torsion:
C
C T
T
Shear
Tension carried by stirrups
Flexure‐shear cracks
Sources of tension (ctd):
4. Tension near the supports of beams:
The longitudinal tension at the support is greater than indicated
by the bending moment diagram.
The tensile force at the bottom of the inclined crack is equal to
the compressive force at the top of the crack.
Sources of tension (ctd):
Lst
AS3600‐2009 (8.1.10.4):
Sufficient bottom steel must be
anchored for a length (Lst) past the
mid‐point of the bearing to develop
a tensile force of V*cot θv/φ (plus any
additional force arising from restraint)
This requirement is deemed to be satisfied if either
≥ ½ Ast is extended past the face of the support by ≥ 12db ; or
≥ ⅓ Ast is extended past the face of the support by ≥ 12db + D/2
where Ast is the tensile steel area required at mid‐span
Sources of tension (ctd):
5. Tension within the supports of beams and slabs:
Cracking due to inadequate
slip joint between slab and
supporting brickwall
Sources of tension (ctd):
6. Tension within connections:
Hanger
reinf. to
carry
tension
Primary girder
Compression struts
Reaction from secondary beam
applied here
Secondary
beam
M
M
C
C
T
T
M
M
(a) Internal forces (b) Crack pattern
2 T
Sources of tension (ctd):
7. Tension at concentrated loads:
Sources of tension (ctd):
8. Tension caused by directional changes of internal forces:
(a)
T
T
T
R
stirrups
(b)
Lsy.t
(c)
C C
R Potential crack in web
Asv at spacing s
Sources of tension (ctd):
8. Tension caused by directional changes of internal forces:
(a)
T
T
T
R
stirrups
(b)
Lsy.t
(c)
Asv at spacing s
C
T
C
T
rm
qt
Ast
m
sy
st
m
t
r
f
A
r
T
q =
= m
sy
vy
st
sv
t
vy
sv
r
f
f
A
A
q
f
A
s .
.
=
=
Transverse tension: Required stirrup spacing:
Splitting failures around developing bars.
F F F
β
T
F F F
Tensile stresses
Splittin
Atr Atr
Splitting cracks
a) Forces exerted by concrete on a deformed bar (b) Tensile stresses in concrete
at a tensile anchorage
(c) Horizontal splitting due (d) Vertical splitting due to (e) Splitting (bond) failure
insufficient bar spacing. insufficient cover at a lapped splice.
Anchorage of deformed bars is tension:
Lsy.t
φ fb
As fsy
b
sy
b
t
sy
f
f
d
L
φ
4
. ≥
• For a reinforcement bar to reach its yield stress at a critical
cross‐section, a minimum length of reinforcing bar (an
anchorage) is required on either side of the section.
• AS3600‐2009 specifies a minimum length, called the development
length, Lsy.t, over which a straight bar in tension must be embedded in
the concrete in order to develop the yield stress.
• An average design ultimate bond stress φfb is assumed at the interface
between the concrete and the reinforcing bar (φ = 0.6).
• φfb depends on ‐ type and condition of reinforcing bar; strength
and compaction of concrete; concrete cover;
bar spacing; transverse reinforcement;
transverse pressure (or tension).
• The basic development length, Lsy.tb, is
where k1 = 1.3 for a horizontal bar with > 300mm of concrete cast
below it and k1 = 1.0 for all other bars;
k2 = (132 – db)/100 ;
k3= 1.0 ‐ 0.15(cd – db)/db (but 0.7≤ k3 ≤1.0)
cd is the smaller of the concrete cover to the bar or half
the clear distance to the next parallel bar;
f′c shall not be taken to exceed 65 MPa
AS3600‐2009: (§13.1.2.2)
b
d
k1
29
≥
c
2
b
sy
3
1
sy.tb
5
.
0
f
k
d
f
k
k
L
′
=
AS3600‐2009 (§13.1.2.2)
c1
c
a/2
cd = min(a/2, c, c1)
• The development length Lsy.t may be taken as the basic
development length or may be refined to include the beneficial
effects of confinements by transverse steel or transverse pressure
and is
where k4 = 1 ‐ Kλ (but 0.7≤ k4 ≤ 1.0); and
k5 = 1.0 ‐ 0.04ρp (but 0.7≤ k5 ≤1.0);
AS3600-2009 ctd (§13.1.2.3)
sy.tb
5
4
sy.t L
k
k
L =
FIGURE 13.1.2.3(B) VALUES OF K FOR BEAMS AND SLABS
K = 0.1 K = 0.05 K = 0
sy.tb
5
4
sy.t L
k
k
L =
k4 = 1 - KÎť
where
λ = (ΣAtr − ΣAtr.min)/As ;
ÎŁAtr = cross-sectional area of the transverse reinforcement along the development
length Lsy.t
ÎŁAtr.min = cross-sectional area of the minimum transverse reinforcement, which may
be taken as 0.25As for beams and 0 for slabs
As = cross-sectional area of a single bar of diameter db being anchored
K = is a factor that accounts for the position of the bars being anchored
relative to the transverse reinforcement, with values given below:
AS3600-2009 ctd (§13.1.2.3)
• The development length Lst to develop a stress σst lower than fsy :
When calculating σst don’t forget to include the strength reduction factor
(φ = 0.8). If T* is the design ultimate tensile force in the reinforcement
caused by the factored design loads, then:
and therefore
AS3600-2009 ctd (§13.1.2.3)
b
sy
st
sy.t
st 12d
f
L
L ≥
=
σ
st
st
st
st
*
*
A
T
A
T
φ
σ
σ
φ
≥
≤
• The development length of a deformed bar with a standard hook
or cog:
AS3600-2009 ctd (§13.1.2.3)
(a) Standard hook (180° bend) (b) Standard hook (135° bend).
0.5Lsy.t
≥ 4db or 70mm
did
X
0.5Lsy.t
did /2
X
(c) Standard cog (90° bend).
0.5Lsy.t
did /2
X
A A
A
X X
X
did 0.5did
0.5Lsy.t
0.5Lsy.t
0.5Lsy.t
≥ 4db or 70mm
(a) Standard hook (180° bend) (b) Standard hook (135° bend)
(c) Standard cog (90° bend)
WORKED EXAMPLE:
Consider the minimum development length required for the two
terminated 28 mm diameter bottom bars in the beam shown below.
Take fsy = 500 MPa; f’c = 32 MPa; cover to the 28 mm bars c = 40 mm;
and the clear spacing between the bottom bars a = 60 mm.
The cross‐sectional area of one N28 bar is As = 620 mm2 and with N12
stirrups at 150 mm centres, Atr = 110 mm2.
AS3600-2009
P P
Lsy.t
12mm stirrups at 150mm ctrs
Two terminated bars
A
A
Elevation Section A-A
Lsy.t + d
Lsy.t + D
For bottom bars: k1 = 1.0;
For 28 mm diameter bars: k2 = (132 – 28)/100 = 1.04;
The concrete confinement dimension, cd = a/2 = 30 mm, and therefore
k3 = 1.0 – 0.15(30 – 28)/28 = 0.99
The basic development length is therefore
The minimum number of stirrups that can be located within the basic
development length is 7. Therefore, ÎŁAtr = 7 x 110 = 770 mm2.
Taking ÎŁAtr.min = 0.25As = 155 mm2, the parameter
λ = (770 – 155)/620 = 0.99
Worked Example ctd (§13.1.2.3)
)
29
(
mm
1178
32
04
.
1
28
500
99
.
0
0
.
1
5
.
0
1
sy.tb b
d
k
L >
=
×
×
×
×
=
c
2
b
sy
3
1
sy.tb
5
.
0
f
k
d
f
k
k
L
′
=
From Figure 13.1.2B, K = 0.05 (as it is the two interior bars that are being
developed) and therefore
It is assumed that in this location the transverse pressure perpendicular to
the anchored bar (ρp) is zero, and hence k5 = 1.0.
From Eq. 13.1.2.3:
Worked Example ctd (§13.1.2.3)
sy.tb
5
4
sy.t L
k
k
L =
95
.
0
99
.
0
05
.
0
0
.
1
0
.
1
4 =
×
−
=
−
= Îť
K
k
.
mm
1120
1178
0
.
1
95
.
0
.
5
4
. =
×
×
=
= bt
sy
t
sy L
k
k
L
The strength of the beam must be checked at the point where the two
bars are terminated (ie. at Lsy.t+d from the constant moment region)
Lapped Splices for bars in tension (13.2.2
Lapped Splices for bars in tension (13.2.2 –
– AS3600
AS3600‐
‐2009):
2009):
PLANAR VIEW
sL a
db sb
Lsy.t.lap
Note: For the purposes of determining cd, the
dimension a shall be taken equal to (sL-db)
irrespective of the value of sb.
cd, = min (a/2, ccrit )
(i) 100% of bars spliced (no staggered splice)
cd, = min (a/2, ccrit )
(ii) 50% staggered splices
PLANAR VIEW
Lsy.t.lap
≥ 0.3Lsy.t.lap
a
sL
sb
Note: For the purposes of determining cd, the
dimension a shall be taken equal to 2sL
irrespective of the value of sb.
(a/2, c )
(a/2, c )
cd = min (a/2, c)
(i) 100% of bars spliced (no staggered splices)
(ii) 50% staggered splices
cd = min (a/2, c)
Lapped Splices for bars in tension:
Lapped Splices for bars in tension:
AS3600‐2009: §13.2.2
sy.t
7
sy.t.lap L
k
L = b
d
k1
29
≥
k7 shall be taken as 1.25, unless As provided is greater than As required
and no more than one‐half of the tensile reinforcement at the section is
spliced, in which case k7 = 1.
In narrow elements or members (such as beam webs and columns), the
tensile lap length (Lsy.t.lap) shall be not less than the larger of k7 Lsy.t and
Lsy.t +1.5sb, where sb is the clear distance between bars of the lapped
splice as shown in Figure 8.15.
Consider the lapped splice requirements for N12 bars at 200 mm centres in the
bottom of a slab. Cover = 20 mm. Concrete strength = 25 MPa.
AS3600‐2009:
ACI 318‐08: (Refined – Clause 12.2.3)
b
e
t
d
lap d
f
f
L
c
y
1
.
2
3
.
1
3
.
1
′
=
=
Îť
ψ
ψ
l
12
25
0
.
1
1
.
2
0
.
1
0
.
1
500
3
.
1 ×
×
×
×
×
×
=
b
d
9
.
61
mm
743 =
=
b
b
tr
b
s
e
t
d
lap d
d
K
c
f
f
L
)
(
1
.
1
3
.
1
3
.
1
c
y
+
′
=
=
Îť
ψ
ψ
ψ
l
12
)
12
0
26
(
25
0
.
1
1
.
1
8
.
0
0
.
1
0
.
1
500
3
.
1 ×
+
×
×
×
×
×
×
=
b
d
7
.
43
mm
524 =
=
ACI 318‐08: (Simplified – Clause 12.2.2)
c
2
b
sy
3
1
sy.tb
sy.t.lap
5
.
0
25
.
1
f
k
d
f
k
k
L
L
′
=
=
25
2
.
1
12
500
90
.
0
0
.
1
5
.
0
25
.
1
×
×
×
×
×
×
=
b
d
9
.
46
mm
563 =
=
)
2001
3600
AS
in
7
.
30
mm
369
.
.
(
−
= b
d
f
c
Detailing of beams:
Anchorage of longitudinal reinforcement:
Favorable anchorage
Elevation Section
Unfavorable anchorage Transverse tension
Possible
cracks
Normal
pressure
C
C
T T
T
When bottom reinforcement is
terminated away from the support,
the diagonal compression in the web
improves the anchorage.
Current wording:
“The design for flexural strength and detailing of flexural reinforcement
and pretensioned tendons at termination shall be extended from the
theoretical cut‐off point, or debonding point, by a length of 1.0D + Lsy.t, or
1.0D + Lpt, where D is the member depth at the theoretical cut‐off point or
theoretical debonding point”
‐ Problem 1: The wording does not make sense
‐ Problem 2: The rule is incorrect – a bar does not have to develop
its yield stress at the theoretical cut‐off point
Amended wording:
“Where flexural reinforcement and pretensioned tendons are to be
terminated, the bars or tendons shall be extended from the theoretical cut‐
off point, or theoretical debonding point, by a length of at least 1.0D + Lst,
or 1.0D + Lpt, respectively, where D is the member depth at the theoretical
cut‐off point or theoretical debonding point”
AS3600-2009 Clause 8.1.10.1
Detailing of beams (ctd):
tilted anchorage near horizontal anchorage diagonal compression
Reaction pressure Reaction pressure
Sections and Elevations
Plan
The transverse tension that may cause splitting in
the plane of a hooked anchorage at a support can
be overcome at a beam support simply by tilting the
hook and exposing it to the normal reaction pressure.
Detailing of beams (ctd):
If the bearing length at a support is small and close to the free end of a
member, a sliding shear failure along a steep inclined crack may occur.
Additional small diameter bars may be required perpendicular to the
potential failure plane
Potential failure
surface
Inclined clamping
bars
Detailing of beams (ctd):
Where the length available for anchorage is small, mechanical
anchorages in the form of welded cross‐bars or end plates may be used.
Common in precast elements, corbels, brackets and at other support
points.
welded
cross‐bar
end plate
(a) (b) (c)
recessed
angle
Detailing of beams (ctd):
In short span members, where load is carried to the support by arch
action, it is essential that all bottom reinforcement (the tie of the arch)
is fully developed at each support. Closely spaced transverse stirrups
can be used to improve anchorage of the tie reinforcement.
Compressive strut
Tie
Do NOT terminate any bottom bars
Binding
reinforcement
Anchorage is
critical
Member
Centreline
Detailing of beams (ctd):
Concentrating top steel at a support in a beam within the web can lead
to crack control problems in the adjacent slab (Leonhardt et al.)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 100 200 300 400 500
Load (kN)
Crack
width
(0.01
mm))
As = 1030 mm2
As = 1020 mm2
Detailing of beams (ctd):
Anchorage of Stirrups:
ž Tension in stirrup is more or less constant over height of vertical leg.
Therefore, all points on vertical leg must be fully developed
ž Stirrup anchorages should be located in the compressive zone and
be shown on the structural drawings.
¾ The area of shear reinforcement required at a particular cross‐
section should be provided for a distance D from that cross‐section
in the direction of decreasing shear (AS3600‐2009 – Clause 8.2.12.3).
Compressive top chord (concrete)
Vertical ties (stirrups)
Inclined web struts
(concrete)
Tensile bottom chord (Ast)
Detailing of beams (ctd):
Types of Stirrups:
(a) Incorrect
Inadequate anchorage
A 90° cog is ineffective if the
cover concrete is lost
Tensile lapped
splice
(c) Satisfactory
Compressive side
Tensile side
(b) Undesirable (but satisfactory)
In regions where ductility is required,
the open stirrups (commonly used in
post‐tensioned beams) do not confine the
compressive concrete
Detailing of beams (ctd):
Types of Stirrups:
cracks
Ts
Cd
Compression strut
Cd
Ts
Ts
Rigid Flexible
¾ Multi‐leg stirrups should be used in members with wide webs to
avoid the undesirable distribution of diagonal compression shown
¾ Multi‐leg sturrups better control shear cracking and help maintain
shear transfer though aggregate interlock
Detailing of beams (ctd):
Types of Stirrups:
¾ Multi‐leg stirrups are also far better for controlling the
longitudinal splitting cracks (known as dowel cracks) that
precipitate bond failure of the longitudinal bars in the shear span.
ž Often this critical shear crack occurs where bottom bars are
terminated in the shear span. Additional shear reinforcement may
be required in this region (Clause 8.1.10.5 – AS3600‐2009).
Dowel crack
Detailing of beams (ctd):
Crack control provided by shear reinforcement (Leonhardt et al):
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0 200 400 600
Load P (kN)
Maximum
crack
width
(mm)
1
2
3
4
(mm)
Detailing of beams (ctd):
Support and Loading Points:
ž When the support is at the soffit of a beam or slab, the diagonal
compression passes directly into the support as shown
ž When the support is at the top of the beam, the diagonal compression
must be carried back up to the support via an internal tie.
ž It is essential that adequately anchored reinforcement be included
to act as the tension tie and the reinforcement must be anchored
into the support
(a) Support under
support
Internal
tie
(b) Support over
Detailing of beams (ctd):
Slab supported by upturned beam:
(a) Incorrect detail
ž The vertical component of the diagonal compression in the slab
(i.e. the reaction from the slab) must be carried in tension up to the
top of the upturned beam.
¾ Don’t rely on the unreinforced surface to carry this tension
Unreinforced
surface
(b) Correct detail
Detailing of beams (ctd):
Beam‐to‐beam connection:
ž The area of additional
suspension reinforcement
is
Primary
girder
R*
suspension
reinforcement
(a) Section
Secondary
beam
Compression strut in secondary beam
Suspension
reinforcement
(b) Primary girder ‐ Elevation
Stirrups
for shear
(c) Primary girder – Truss analogy
R*
sy
sr
f
R
A
φ
*
=
Detailing of beams (ctd):
Beam‐to‐beam connection:
ž When a load is applied to the underside of a reinforced concrete
beam, some device must be used to transfer this hanging load to the
top of the beam
(b) Internal rods
Detailing of beams (ctd):
Half‐Joint or dapped‐end joint:
(a) Half joint
(b) Strut and tie model Reinforcement detail
Hairpin reinforcement
Suspension reinforcement
(c) Alternative strut and tie model Reinforcement detail
•
• Excessive cracking
Excessive cracking due to
due to restrained deformation
restrained deformation or
or external
external
loads
loads is a common cause of damage in reinforced concrete
is a common cause of damage in reinforced concrete
structures.
structures.
•
• Excessive cracking
Excessive cracking in the hardened concrete can be avoided
in the hardened concrete can be avoided
by including sufficient reinforcement at sufficien
by including sufficient reinforcement at sufficiently close
tly close
spacings
spacings.
.
•
• Shrinkage
Shrinkage causes a
causes a gradual widening of existing cracks
gradual widening of existing cracks and
and
time
time‐
‐dependent cracking
dependent cracking in previously uncracked regions.
in previously uncracked regions.
Detailing for Crack Control
Detailing for Crack Control
•
• The
The minimum quantities of reinforcement
minimum quantities of reinforcement specified for crack
specified for crack
control in AS3600 may not be what is actually requ
control in AS3600 may not be what is actually required in all
ired in all
circumstances.
circumstances.
•
• The
The width of a crack
width of a crack depends on
depends on
‐
‐ the quantity, orientation and distribution of the
the quantity, orientation and distribution of the
reinforcing steel crossing the crack;
reinforcing steel crossing the crack;
‐
‐ concrete cover and member size;
concrete cover and member size;
‐
‐ the bond between concrete and reinforcement
the bond between concrete and reinforcement
in the vicinity of the crack;
in the vicinity of the crack;
‐
‐ the deformation characteristics of concrete; and
the deformation characteristics of concrete; and
‐
‐ the shrinkage strain (and therefore the time after
the shrinkage strain (and therefore the time after
crack formation).
crack formation).
‐
‐ the cause of the crack
the cause of the crack
‐
‐ the degree of restraint
the degree of restraint
•
• Often significantly more reinforcement than the minimum
specified amount is required.
Crack spacing, s, varies between
0.5d and 1.5d and depends on
- steel area and distribution
- cover
Crack width, w, depends on
- steel stress
- bar diameter and bar spacing
- cover
- adjacent crack spacings
and the average crack spacing
decreases with time due to
shrinkage
and increases with time due to
shrinkage
d
Maximum crack widths
increase with time by a factor
of between 2 and 4
Service loads
Flexural cracks
Flexural cracking:
Simplified Approach for Flexural Crack Control in AS3600‐2009
(Clause 8.6.1 and 9.4.1):
For reinforced concrete beams and slabs, cracking is deemed to be controlled
(crack widths will be less than 0.3 mm) if each of the following is satisfied:
(a) the quantity of tensile reinforcement in a beam or slab provides an
ultimate strength at least 20% higher than the cracking moment
calculated assuming σcs = 0;
(b) the distance from the side or soffit of the member to the centre of the
nearest longitudinal bar shall not exceed 100 mm;
(c) The centre‐to‐centre spacing of bars near a tension face of a beam or
slab shall not exceed 300 mm for a beam and the lesser of two times
the slab thickness and 300 mm for a slab.
(d) The stress in the tensile steel is less than a limiting value (as follows):
Simplified Approach for Flexural Crack Control in AS3600‐2009
(Clause 8.6.1 and 9.4.1): Ctd
For members subject primarily to flexure, the calculated steel stress caused
by the serviceability design moment shall not exceed the larger of the
maximum steel stresses given in Tables 8.6.1(A) and 8.6.1(B) for beams
and Tables 9.4.1(A) and 9.4.1(B) for slabs.
Table 8.6.1(A): Maximum steel stress for Table 8.6.1(B): Maximum steel stress for
tension or flexure in r.c. beams. flexure in r.c. beams.
Nominal bar
diameter
(mm)
Maximum steel
stress
(MPa)
Centre-to-centre
spacing
(mm)
Maximum steel
stress
(MPa)
10 360 50 360
12 330 100 320
16 280 150 280
20 240 200 240
24 210 250 200
28 185 300 160
32 160
36 140
40 120
Simplified Approach for Flexural Crack Control in AS3600‐2009
(Clause 8.6.1 and 9.4.1): Ctd
For members subject primarily to tension, the calculated steel stress caused
by the serviceability design actions shall not exceed the maximum steel
stresses given in Tables 8.6.1(A) for beams and Tables 9.4.1(A) for slabs.
Table 9.4.1(A): Maximum steel stress for Table 9.4.1(B): Maximum steel stress for
flexure in r.c. slabs. flexure in r.c. slabs.
Maximum steel stress (MPa)
for overall depth Ds (mm)
Nominal bar
diameter
(mm) ≤ 300 > 300
Centre-to-centre
spacing
(mm)
Maximum steel
stress
(MPa)
6 375 450 50 360
8 345 400 100 320
10 320 360 150 280
12 300 330 200 240
16 265 280 250 200
20 240 300 160
24 210
Restrained Shrinkage Cracking in Slabs
Restrained Shrinkage Cracking in Slabs:
:
™
™ Provided that
Provided that bonded reinforcement
bonded reinforcement at
at reasonable spacing
reasonable spacing crosses
crosses
the crack and that the member does not
the crack and that the member does not deflect excessively, flexural
deflect excessively, flexural
cracks are usually well controlled in reinforced concrete
cracks are usually well controlled in reinforced concrete beams and
beams and
slabs.
slabs.
™
™ In contrast,
In contrast, direct tension cracks
direct tension cracks due to restrained shrinkage and
due to restrained shrinkage and
temperature changes frequently lead to serviceability prob
temperature changes frequently lead to serviceability problems,
lems,
particularly in regions of low moment.
particularly in regions of low moment.
™
™ Such cracks usually extend completely through the member and a
Such cracks usually extend completely through the member and are
re
more parallel sided than flexural cracks.
more parallel sided than flexural cracks.
™
™ If uncontrolled, these cracks can become very wide and lead to
If uncontrolled, these cracks can become very wide and lead to
waterproofing and corrosion problems.
waterproofing and corrosion problems.
™
™ They can also disrupt the integrity and the structural action
They can also disrupt the integrity and the structural action of the slab.
of the slab.
Flexural cracks
One‐way floor slab supported on beams
Full depth restrained shrinkage cracks
ž Usually more steel is required to control the restrained shrinkage
cracks than is required to control the flexural cracks and provide
adequate strength.
The slab is restrained by beams and shrinkage induces tension
in the slab in the direction of the beams
Restrained Shrinkage Cracking in Slabs
Restrained Shrinkage Cracking in Slabs Ctd
Ctd:
:
™
™ In the primary direction, shrinkage will cause small increases in the
widths of the many fine flexural cracks and may cause additional
flexure type cracks in the previously uncracked regions.
™ However, in the secondary direction, which is in effect a direct
tension situation, shrinkage generally causes a few widely spaced
cracks which penetrate completely through the slab.
™ If the amount of reinforcement crossing a direct tension crack is
small, yielding of the steel will occur and a wide, unserviceable crack
will result. To avoid this eventuality, the minimum steel ratio, ρmin is
where . For 32 MPa concrete, ρmin = 0.0034.
™ For a serviceable crack width, significantly more steel than this is
required.
sy
ct
st
f
f
d
b
A 2
.
1
min
min =
⎟
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎜
⎝
⎛
=
ρ
'
25
.
0 c
ct f
f =
Crack Control in Slabs
Crack Control in Slabs –
–AS3600
AS3600‐
‐2009:
2009:
™ Where the ends of a slab are restrained and the slab is not free to
expand or contract in the secondary direction, the minimum area of
reinforcement in the restrained direction is given by either Eq. 1a,
1b or 1c, as appropriate (see below).
™ For a slab fully enclosed within a building except for a brief period of
weather exposure during construction:
(i) where a strong degree of control over cracking is required:
(ii) where a moderate degree of control over cracking is required:
(iii) where a minor degree of control over cracking is required:
( ) )
a
2
.
9
(
10
)
5
.
2
0
.
6
( 3
min
−
×
−
= D
b
A cp
s σ
( ) )
b
2
.
9
(
10
)
5
.
2
5
.
3
( 3
min
−
×
−
= D
b
A cp
s σ
( ) )
c
2
.
9
(
10
)
5
.
2
75
.
1
( 3
min
−
×
−
= D
b
A cp
s σ
(1a)
(1b)
(1c)
™ For all other slab surface conditions in Exposure Classification A1
and for exposure classification A2, Eq. 1a applies where a strong
degree of control over cracking is required for appearance or where
cracks may reflect through finishes
and Eq. 1b applies where a moderate degree of control over cracking
is required and where cracks are inconsequential or hidden from view.
™ For Exposure Classifications B1, B2, C1 and C2, Eq. 1a always applies.
™ The minimum steel area given by Eq. 1c is appropriate in an
unrestrained direction where the slab is free to expand or contract.
™ In the primary direction of a one‐way slab or in each direction of a
two‐way slab, the minimum quantity of reinforcement is the greater of
the minimum quantity required for the strength limit state or 75% of
the minimum area required by Eqs. 1a, 1b or 1c, as appropriate.
( ) )
a
2
.
9
(
10
)
5
.
2
0
.
6
( 3
min
−
×
−
= D
b
A cp
s σ
( ) )
b
2
.
9
(
10
)
5
.
2
5
.
3
( 3
min
−
×
−
= D
b
A cp
s σ
(1a)
(1b)
Consider a slab restrained at each end.
With time, restrained shrinkage cracks occur at roughly regular centres
depending on the amount of reinforcement:
(a) Portion of restrained member after all cracking
(c) Steel stress after all shrinkage cracking
(b) Average concrete stress after all shrinkage
Typical values:
Consider a 140 mm thick, 4m long slab fully‐restrained at both ends
and symmetrically reinforced with N12 bars at 250 mm centres top
and bottom. Hence, As= 900 mm2/m and ρ = As/Ac = 0.00643.
L = 4 m
140 mm
For 25 MPa concrete with a final shrinkage strain of 0.0007 and
typical material properties, a shrinkage cracking analysis of this
restrained slab indicates 4 or 5 full depth cracks within the 4 m
length with the maximum final crack width about 0.3 mm.
If p = 0 :
p = As/Ac
2.8 mm
one large
unserviceable
crack
If p = 0.0035
≈ 0.6 – 0.7 mm
about three
unserviceable
(?) cracks
If p = 0.006
≈ 0.3 – 0.4 mm
Four or five
serviceable
(?) cracks
4 m
140 mm
Detailing of columns:
Lapped compressive splices:
Normal
fitment
spacing, s
Additional
fitment spacing,
s’ < 4c
R
Additional fitments at
compressive splice
Tension at
cranked bars
Unsatisfactory tension
splice in thin wall
Detailing of columns:
Typical tie arrangements in columns:
AS3600‐2009 requirements for restraining single longitudinal bars in columns:
(i) Every corner bar;
(ii) All bars ‐ where bars are spaced at centres > 150 mm;
(iii) At least every alternate bar ‐ where bar centres ≤ 150mm.
For bundled bars – each bundle must be restrained.
All longitudinal bars in
these columns are restrained
at
(i) a bend in a fitment of 135°
or less; or
(ii) at a fitment hooks with
included angle of 135° or
less, as shown.
Detailing of columns:
Minimum bar diameters for fitments (AS3600‐2009):
6
10
12
16
12
Single bars up to 20
Single bars 24 to 28
Single bars 28 to 36
Single bar 40
Bundled bars
Minimum bar diameter
for fitment and helix (mm)
Longitudinal bar diameter
(mm)
Maximum spacing of fitments (AS3600‐2009):
The spacing of fitments (or the pitch of a helix) should not exceed the
smaller of:
Dc and 15db for single bars
0.5Dc and 7.5db for bundled bars
Detailing of Beam‐column Connections:
Knee Connections (or two‐member connections):
(a) (b) (c)
(d)
Figure 8.37 Two-member connections.
Detailing of Beam‐column Connections:
Knee Connections under “Opening” Moment:
M
M
C
C
T
T
T
2
M
M
(a) Internal forces (b) Crack pattern
M
M
M
M
(a) Unsatisfactory (b) Unsatisfactory
M
M
(c) Potentially satisfactory
f
sy
sy
st
f
sy
sv
f
f
A
f
T
A
.
.
2
2
φ
φ
=
=
Detailing of Beam‐column Connections:
Knee Connections under “Opening” Moment – Suggested detail:
Diagonal flexural bars
Diagonal
stirrups
M
M
Detailing of Beam‐column Connections:
Knee Connections under “Closing” Moment:
M
M
T
T
C
C
T
2
M
M
(a) Internal forces (b) Crack pattern
M
M
(a) Wall or slab connection (when p ≤ fct.f /fsy) (b) Beam to column knee connection
M
M
Detailing of Beam‐column Connections:
Three‐member connections:
(a) Internal forces (b) Crack pattern
High bond stress
Poor anchorage
conditions
Detailing of Beam‐column Connections:
Three‐member connections – Reinforcement detail:
Larger diameter bar to distribute
bearing stresses in bend
Ties to carry diagonal tension, to
control vertical splitting and to
confine the concrete core
Detailing of Beam‐column Connections:
Four‐member connections:
(a) Internal forces (b) Crack pattern (c) Reinforcement detail
Detailing of Corbels:
(a) Strut-and-tie action (b) Reinforcement detail (c) Welded primary steel
Crack control steel
Main or primary tensile
reinforcement
Cross bar to
distribute bearing
stresses in bend
T
C
ℓweld=¾db
ℓweld=¾db
tweld=db/2
tweld=db/2
db
db
Primary tensile reinforcement
Anchor
bar
(d) Satisfactory weld details (17)
Welded
anchor bar
(see Fig 8.46d)
Primary
tension steel
Design of Corbels:
T
C
θ
d D
a
V*
Figure 8.47
≥ d/2
)
8
.
0
(
tan
*
=
=
= φ
φ
θ
sy
s f
A
V
T
θ
φ tan
*
sy
s
f
V
A =
∴
)
6
.
0
(
9
.
0 =
′
= st
c
c
s
st
u
st A
f
C φ
β
φ
φ
Tie:
Strut:
)
0
.
1
3
.
0
(
cot
66
.
0
0
.
1
1
2
≤
≤
+
= s
s β
θ
β
2
/
s
h A
A ≥
Park and Paulay suggest that a good first estimate of corbel dimensions
is obtained from:
and ACI318‐08 suggests
c
w f
d
b
V ′
≤ 56
.
0
/
*
sy
c
w
s
sy
c f
f
d
b
A
f
f
d
a /
2
.
0
/
/
04
.
0
and
0
.
1
/ ′
≤
≤
′
≤
Design of Corbels:
d D
400
mm
D/2
200
mm
T*
C*
(b)
θ
V*
dc=400/sinθ
= 541 mm
d D
400
mm
V*
= 500kN
D/2 200
mm
(a)
bw = 300 mm
MPa
32
=
′
c
f MPa
500
=
sy
f Cover = 30 mm
Bearing plate = 200 x 300 mm in plan
dc = 200/sinθ
= 270 mm
Design of Corbels:
From :
56
.
0
/
*
c
w f
d
b
V ′
≤ mm
526
32
56
.
0
300
10
500 3
=
×
×
×
≥
d
With D = d + cover + 0.5 bar dia and assuming 20 mm diameter bars,
take D = 570 mm and therefore d = 530 mm.
From the geometry:
and
Try 4 N20 bars (1240 mm2)
Now
The strut efficiency factor:
and
400
)
90
tan(
100
tan
θ
θ
−
−
=
d o
7
.
47
=
∴ θ
2
3
mm
1138
7
.
47
tan
500
8
.
0
10
500
=
×
×
×
=
s
A
OK
/
122
.
0
0078
.
0
/ ∴
′
=
= sy
c
w
s f
f
d
b
A
65
.
0
cot
66
.
0
0
.
1
1
2
=
+
=
θ
βs
kN
911
81150
32
9
.
0
65
.
0
6
.
0 =
×
×
×
×
=
u
stC
φ
OK
kN
743
cos
/
*
* ∴
=
=
> θ
V
C
Design of Corbels:
285
285
4 N20
3 N12
stirrups
ELEVATION
PLAN
285
285
4 N20
3 N12
Stirrups
N28 welded
cross-bar
ELEVATION
PLAN
N24 cross-bar
(welded to N20s)
JOINTS IN STRUCTURES:
Joints are introduced into concrete structures for two main reasons:
1) As stopping places in the concreting operation. The location of
these construction joints depends on the size and production
capacity of the construction site and work force;
2) To accommodate deformation (expansion, contraction, rotation,
settlement) without local distress or loss of integrity of the
structure. Such joints include:
control joints (contraction joints);
expansion joints;
structural joints (such as hinges, pin and roller joints);
shrinkage strips; and
isolation joints.
The location of these joints depends on the anticipated
movements of the structure during its lifetime and the resulting
effects on structural behaviour.
Construction Joints:
Steel dowels to improve shear strength
1st
pour 2nd
pour
Waterstop where water tightness is required
(a) Butt joint (b) Keyed joint
(c) Doweled joint
Control Joints (or Contraction Joints):
Debond dowel to ensure free contraction
Saw cut > 0.2 t and 20 mm ≈0.75 t
Discontinue every second bar if necessary so that p < 0.002
(a) Saw-cut joint in slab on ground (b) Wall (t < 200 mm)
(d) Wall (t ≥ 200 mm) (c) Doweled joint
t
≈0.75 t
Discontinue every second bar if necessary so that p < 0.002
Typical control joint locations:
Control joint locations
(a) Wall elevation
(b) Balcony plan
Alternative shrinkage strip details:
Shrinkage
strip
Shrinkage
strip
Expansion joint details:
≥ 25 mm
Joint locations
(a) Double column and beams
(b) Half joint
(c) Building plans – joint locations
(a) Double column and beams
Alternative structural hinge joints at base of a column:
Elastic, easily
compressible
material
Mesnager
hinge
Confinement steel
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ?

More Related Content

What's hot

CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester): Lecture 1a - Overview of Tall Buildings
CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester): Lecture 1a - Overview of Tall BuildingsCE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester): Lecture 1a - Overview of Tall Buildings
CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester): Lecture 1a - Overview of Tall BuildingsFawad Najam
 
Reinforced Concrete Structure and Detailing Module
Reinforced Concrete Structure and Detailing ModuleReinforced Concrete Structure and Detailing Module
Reinforced Concrete Structure and Detailing ModuleBahzad5
 
Post-tensioning in Prestressed Concrete
Post-tensioning in Prestressed ConcretePost-tensioning in Prestressed Concrete
Post-tensioning in Prestressed ConcreteDavinderpal Singh
 
CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester) Lecture 3 - Design Criteria
CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester) Lecture 3 - Design Criteria CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester) Lecture 3 - Design Criteria
CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester) Lecture 3 - Design Criteria Fawad Najam
 
Design of Reinforced Masonry
Design of Reinforced MasonryDesign of Reinforced Masonry
Design of Reinforced MasonryTeja Ande
 
Losses in prestressed concrete
Losses in prestressed concreteLosses in prestressed concrete
Losses in prestressed concreteShubham Singh [NITK]
 
LRFD Design Example -Steel Girder Bridge (US Unit).pdf
LRFD Design Example -Steel Girder Bridge (US Unit).pdfLRFD Design Example -Steel Girder Bridge (US Unit).pdf
LRFD Design Example -Steel Girder Bridge (US Unit).pdfSaminSiraj1
 
CE 72.52 - Lecture 5 - Column Design
CE 72.52 - Lecture 5 - Column DesignCE 72.52 - Lecture 5 - Column Design
CE 72.52 - Lecture 5 - Column DesignFawad Najam
 
What are the types of structural steel framing
What are the types of structural steel framingWhat are the types of structural steel framing
What are the types of structural steel framingnajeeb muhamed
 
Design and detailing of flat slabs
Design and detailing of flat slabs Design and detailing of flat slabs
Design and detailing of flat slabs Godfrey James
 
Shear wall
Shear wallShear wall
Shear wallUma M
 
CE72.52 - Lecture 3a - Section Behavior - Flexure
CE72.52 - Lecture 3a - Section Behavior - FlexureCE72.52 - Lecture 3a - Section Behavior - Flexure
CE72.52 - Lecture 3a - Section Behavior - FlexureFawad Najam
 
Chapter 5 plain and reinforced cement concrete construction
Chapter 5 plain and reinforced cement concrete constructionChapter 5 plain and reinforced cement concrete construction
Chapter 5 plain and reinforced cement concrete constructionKHUSHBU SHAH
 
Ssb04 detailed design of portal frames
Ssb04 detailed design of portal framesSsb04 detailed design of portal frames
Ssb04 detailed design of portal framesMd. Shahadat Hossain
 
DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE
DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTUREDESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE
DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTUREAHMED NADIM JILANI
 

What's hot (20)

Bridge
BridgeBridge
Bridge
 
CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester): Lecture 1a - Overview of Tall Buildings
CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester): Lecture 1a - Overview of Tall BuildingsCE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester): Lecture 1a - Overview of Tall Buildings
CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester): Lecture 1a - Overview of Tall Buildings
 
Reinforced Concrete Structure and Detailing Module
Reinforced Concrete Structure and Detailing ModuleReinforced Concrete Structure and Detailing Module
Reinforced Concrete Structure and Detailing Module
 
Post-tensioning in Prestressed Concrete
Post-tensioning in Prestressed ConcretePost-tensioning in Prestressed Concrete
Post-tensioning in Prestressed Concrete
 
CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester) Lecture 3 - Design Criteria
CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester) Lecture 3 - Design Criteria CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester) Lecture 3 - Design Criteria
CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester) Lecture 3 - Design Criteria
 
Design of Reinforced Masonry
Design of Reinforced MasonryDesign of Reinforced Masonry
Design of Reinforced Masonry
 
Losses in prestressed concrete
Losses in prestressed concreteLosses in prestressed concrete
Losses in prestressed concrete
 
Prestressing Concept, Materials and Prestressing System - Section B, Group 1
Prestressing Concept, Materials and Prestressing System - Section B, Group 1Prestressing Concept, Materials and Prestressing System - Section B, Group 1
Prestressing Concept, Materials and Prestressing System - Section B, Group 1
 
LRFD Design Example -Steel Girder Bridge (US Unit).pdf
LRFD Design Example -Steel Girder Bridge (US Unit).pdfLRFD Design Example -Steel Girder Bridge (US Unit).pdf
LRFD Design Example -Steel Girder Bridge (US Unit).pdf
 
CE-Raft-Foundation.pdf
CE-Raft-Foundation.pdfCE-Raft-Foundation.pdf
CE-Raft-Foundation.pdf
 
CE 72.52 - Lecture 5 - Column Design
CE 72.52 - Lecture 5 - Column DesignCE 72.52 - Lecture 5 - Column Design
CE 72.52 - Lecture 5 - Column Design
 
Bridge defects
Bridge defectsBridge defects
Bridge defects
 
What are the types of structural steel framing
What are the types of structural steel framingWhat are the types of structural steel framing
What are the types of structural steel framing
 
Design and detailing of flat slabs
Design and detailing of flat slabs Design and detailing of flat slabs
Design and detailing of flat slabs
 
Shear wall
Shear wallShear wall
Shear wall
 
Bricks fin
Bricks finBricks fin
Bricks fin
 
CE72.52 - Lecture 3a - Section Behavior - Flexure
CE72.52 - Lecture 3a - Section Behavior - FlexureCE72.52 - Lecture 3a - Section Behavior - Flexure
CE72.52 - Lecture 3a - Section Behavior - Flexure
 
Chapter 5 plain and reinforced cement concrete construction
Chapter 5 plain and reinforced cement concrete constructionChapter 5 plain and reinforced cement concrete construction
Chapter 5 plain and reinforced cement concrete construction
 
Ssb04 detailed design of portal frames
Ssb04 detailed design of portal framesSsb04 detailed design of portal frames
Ssb04 detailed design of portal frames
 
DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE
DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTUREDESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE
DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE
 

Similar to Div_Syd_detailing_of_reinforcement_in_concrete_structures.pdf

Esd ppt 150180106093,111,160183106008 GECDAHOD
Esd ppt 150180106093,111,160183106008 GECDAHODEsd ppt 150180106093,111,160183106008 GECDAHOD
Esd ppt 150180106093,111,160183106008 GECDAHODyasir Khan
 
Sd i-module2- rajesh sir
Sd i-module2- rajesh sirSd i-module2- rajesh sir
Sd i-module2- rajesh sirSHAMJITH KM
 
0 ne way slab
0 ne way slab0 ne way slab
0 ne way slabGolu Singh
 
Design of column base plates anchor bolt
Design of column base plates anchor boltDesign of column base plates anchor bolt
Design of column base plates anchor boltKhaled Eid
 
DACS_UNIT-3- RCC Flat slab ARP.pptx
DACS_UNIT-3- RCC Flat slab ARP.pptxDACS_UNIT-3- RCC Flat slab ARP.pptx
DACS_UNIT-3- RCC Flat slab ARP.pptxAbhijeet Pabale
 
Ns28 1masnry design
Ns28 1masnry designNs28 1masnry design
Ns28 1masnry designhsaam hsaam
 
lacing and battening .pptx
lacing and battening .pptxlacing and battening .pptx
lacing and battening .pptxmayur280524
 
Connections in steel structures
Connections in steel structuresConnections in steel structures
Connections in steel structuresanand bhatnagar
 
Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2
Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2
Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2saibabu48
 
Details of REINFORCEMENT Summary
Details of REINFORCEMENT SummaryDetails of REINFORCEMENT Summary
Details of REINFORCEMENT SummaryMuhammad Yousif Nazar
 
Ductile detailing
Ductile detailingDuctile detailing
Ductile detailingBinay Shrestha
 
DSR chap4 shear and bond pdf.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
DSR chap4 shear and bond pdf.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxDSR chap4 shear and bond pdf.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
DSR chap4 shear and bond pdf.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxADITYAPILLAI29
 
10.01.03.153
10.01.03.15310.01.03.153
10.01.03.153Raiyan Ratul
 
Conceps of RCC-PCC.pptx
Conceps of RCC-PCC.pptxConceps of RCC-PCC.pptx
Conceps of RCC-PCC.pptxastor11
 
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shearrectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shearqueripan
 
Concrete flexural design
Concrete flexural designConcrete flexural design
Concrete flexural designWaqas Javaid
 

Similar to Div_Syd_detailing_of_reinforcement_in_concrete_structures.pdf (20)

Esd ppt 150180106093,111,160183106008 GECDAHOD
Esd ppt 150180106093,111,160183106008 GECDAHODEsd ppt 150180106093,111,160183106008 GECDAHOD
Esd ppt 150180106093,111,160183106008 GECDAHOD
 
Sd i-module2- rajesh sir
Sd i-module2- rajesh sirSd i-module2- rajesh sir
Sd i-module2- rajesh sir
 
0 ne way slab
0 ne way slab0 ne way slab
0 ne way slab
 
Design of column base plates anchor bolt
Design of column base plates anchor boltDesign of column base plates anchor bolt
Design of column base plates anchor bolt
 
DACS_UNIT-3- RCC Flat slab ARP.pptx
DACS_UNIT-3- RCC Flat slab ARP.pptxDACS_UNIT-3- RCC Flat slab ARP.pptx
DACS_UNIT-3- RCC Flat slab ARP.pptx
 
Steel column base44
Steel column base44Steel column base44
Steel column base44
 
Deep beams
Deep beamsDeep beams
Deep beams
 
Ns28 1masnry design
Ns28 1masnry designNs28 1masnry design
Ns28 1masnry design
 
lacing and battening .pptx
lacing and battening .pptxlacing and battening .pptx
lacing and battening .pptx
 
Connections in steel structures
Connections in steel structuresConnections in steel structures
Connections in steel structures
 
Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2
Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2
Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2
 
Details of REINFORCEMENT Summary
Details of REINFORCEMENT SummaryDetails of REINFORCEMENT Summary
Details of REINFORCEMENT Summary
 
Ductile detailing
Ductile detailingDuctile detailing
Ductile detailing
 
Rcc Beams
Rcc BeamsRcc Beams
Rcc Beams
 
DSR chap4 shear and bond pdf.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
DSR chap4 shear and bond pdf.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxDSR chap4 shear and bond pdf.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
DSR chap4 shear and bond pdf.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
10.01.03.153
10.01.03.15310.01.03.153
10.01.03.153
 
Conceps of RCC-PCC.pptx
Conceps of RCC-PCC.pptxConceps of RCC-PCC.pptx
Conceps of RCC-PCC.pptx
 
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shearrectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
 
Column math
Column mathColumn math
Column math
 
Concrete flexural design
Concrete flexural designConcrete flexural design
Concrete flexural design
 

Recently uploaded

Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...srsj9000
 
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024hassan khalil
 
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdfElectronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdfme23b1001
 
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...9953056974 Low Rate Call Girls In Saket, Delhi NCR
 
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidmain PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidNikhilNagaraju
 
Churning of Butter, Factors affecting .
Churning of Butter, Factors affecting  .Churning of Butter, Factors affecting  .
Churning of Butter, Factors affecting .Satyam Kumar
 
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptxApplication of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx959SahilShah
 
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile serviceCall Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile servicerehmti665
 
Effects of rheological properties on mixing
Effects of rheological properties on mixingEffects of rheological properties on mixing
Effects of rheological properties on mixingviprabot1
 
Arduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.ppt
Arduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.pptArduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.ppt
Arduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.pptSAURABHKUMAR892774
 
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...Chandu841456
 
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective IntroductionSachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective IntroductionDr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptxHeart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptxPoojaBan
 
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptxArtificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptxbritheesh05
 
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvv
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvvWork Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvv
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvvLewisJB
 
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptx
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptxIntroduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptx
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptxk795866
 
Internship report on mechanical engineering
Internship report on mechanical engineeringInternship report on mechanical engineering
Internship report on mechanical engineeringmalavadedarshan25
 
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptxBiology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptxDeepakSakkari2
 
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdfRisk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdfROCENODodongVILLACER
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
 
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
 
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdfElectronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
 
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
 
Design and analysis of solar grass cutter.pdf
Design and analysis of solar grass cutter.pdfDesign and analysis of solar grass cutter.pdf
Design and analysis of solar grass cutter.pdf
 
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidmain PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
 
Churning of Butter, Factors affecting .
Churning of Butter, Factors affecting  .Churning of Butter, Factors affecting  .
Churning of Butter, Factors affecting .
 
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptxApplication of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx
 
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile serviceCall Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
 
Effects of rheological properties on mixing
Effects of rheological properties on mixingEffects of rheological properties on mixing
Effects of rheological properties on mixing
 
Arduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.ppt
Arduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.pptArduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.ppt
Arduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.ppt
 
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...
 
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective IntroductionSachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
 
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptxHeart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
 
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptxArtificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
 
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvv
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvvWork Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvv
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvv
 
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptx
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptxIntroduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptx
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptx
 
Internship report on mechanical engineering
Internship report on mechanical engineeringInternship report on mechanical engineering
Internship report on mechanical engineering
 
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptxBiology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
 
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdfRisk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
 

Div_Syd_detailing_of_reinforcement_in_concrete_structures.pdf

  • 1. THE CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PANEL THE CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PANEL ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA SYDNEY DIVISION ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA SYDNEY DIVISION 28 August 2012 Detailing of Reinforcement Detailing of Reinforcement in Concrete Structures in Concrete Structures R.I. Gilbert R.I. Gilbert
  • 2. ž ž Detailing Detailing is often considered to be the is often considered to be the preparation of working preparation of working drawings drawings showing the size and location of the reinforcement in a showing the size and location of the reinforcement in a concrete structure. concrete structure. ž ž Detailing Detailing involves the involves the communication communication of the engineer of the engineer’ ’s design to the s design to the contractors who build the structure. It contractors who build the structure. It involves the translation of a involves the translation of a good structural design from the computer or calculation pad into good structural design from the computer or calculation pad into the the final structure. final structure. ž ž Good detailing ensures that Good detailing ensures that reinforcement reinforcement and concrete interact efficiently and concrete interact efficiently to provide to provide satisfactory satisfactory behaviour behaviour throughout the throughout the complete range of loading. complete range of loading. ž ž In this seminar, guidelines for In this seminar, guidelines for successful successful detailing detailing in structural elements and in structural elements and connections are outlined. connections are outlined. Introduction Introduction: :
  • 3. ž The detailing requirements of a reinforcement bar depend on the reasons for its inclusion in the structure. Reasons include: 1. To carry internal tensile forces, thereby imparting strength and ductility; 2. To control flexural cracking; 3. To control direct tension cracking in restrained structures; 4. To carry compressive forces; 5. To provide restraint to bars in compression; 6. To provide confinement to concrete in compression; 7. To limit long‐term deformation; 8. To provide protection against spalling; and 9. To provide temporary support for other reinforcement during construction.
  • 4. Guiding principles: ž Determine location and direction of all internal forces (i.e. establish a load path that satisfies equilibrium); ž Use adequately anchored reinforcement wherever a tensile force is required for equilibrium; ž Use only ductile reinforcement (Class N or better) when the reinforcement is required for strength; ž Never rely on the concrete’s ability to carry tension (it may not exist); ž Include adequate quantities of reinforcement for crack control; ž Ensure steel details are practical and that steel can be fixed and concrete can be satisfactorily placed and compacted around complex details with adequate cover; and ž Ensure details are economical.
  • 5. Sources of tension: 1. Tension caused by bending (and axial tension): Positive bending Negative bending Axial tension Flexural tension cracks Flexural tension cracks Direct tension cracks
  • 6. Sources of tension: 2. Tension caused by load reversals: Cantilever beam or slab Simple beam or slab Impact and rebound loading
  • 7. Sources of tension (ctd): 3. Tension caused by shear and torsion: C C T T Shear Tension carried by stirrups Flexure‐shear cracks
  • 8. Sources of tension (ctd): 4. Tension near the supports of beams: The longitudinal tension at the support is greater than indicated by the bending moment diagram. The tensile force at the bottom of the inclined crack is equal to the compressive force at the top of the crack.
  • 9. Sources of tension (ctd): Lst AS3600‐2009 (8.1.10.4): Sufficient bottom steel must be anchored for a length (Lst) past the mid‐point of the bearing to develop a tensile force of V*cot θv/φ (plus any additional force arising from restraint) This requirement is deemed to be satisfied if either ≥ ½ Ast is extended past the face of the support by ≥ 12db ; or ≥ ⅓ Ast is extended past the face of the support by ≥ 12db + D/2 where Ast is the tensile steel area required at mid‐span
  • 10. Sources of tension (ctd): 5. Tension within the supports of beams and slabs: Cracking due to inadequate slip joint between slab and supporting brickwall
  • 11. Sources of tension (ctd): 6. Tension within connections: Hanger reinf. to carry tension Primary girder Compression struts Reaction from secondary beam applied here Secondary beam M M C C T T M M (a) Internal forces (b) Crack pattern 2 T
  • 12. Sources of tension (ctd): 7. Tension at concentrated loads:
  • 13. Sources of tension (ctd): 8. Tension caused by directional changes of internal forces: (a) T T T R stirrups (b) Lsy.t (c) C C R Potential crack in web Asv at spacing s
  • 14. Sources of tension (ctd): 8. Tension caused by directional changes of internal forces: (a) T T T R stirrups (b) Lsy.t (c) Asv at spacing s C T C T rm qt Ast m sy st m t r f A r T q = = m sy vy st sv t vy sv r f f A A q f A s . . = = Transverse tension: Required stirrup spacing:
  • 15. Splitting failures around developing bars. F F F β T F F F Tensile stresses Splittin Atr Atr Splitting cracks a) Forces exerted by concrete on a deformed bar (b) Tensile stresses in concrete at a tensile anchorage (c) Horizontal splitting due (d) Vertical splitting due to (e) Splitting (bond) failure insufficient bar spacing. insufficient cover at a lapped splice. Anchorage of deformed bars is tension:
  • 16. Lsy.t φ fb As fsy b sy b t sy f f d L φ 4 . ≥ • For a reinforcement bar to reach its yield stress at a critical cross‐section, a minimum length of reinforcing bar (an anchorage) is required on either side of the section. • AS3600‐2009 specifies a minimum length, called the development length, Lsy.t, over which a straight bar in tension must be embedded in the concrete in order to develop the yield stress. • An average design ultimate bond stress φfb is assumed at the interface between the concrete and the reinforcing bar (φ = 0.6). • φfb depends on ‐ type and condition of reinforcing bar; strength and compaction of concrete; concrete cover; bar spacing; transverse reinforcement; transverse pressure (or tension).
  • 17. • The basic development length, Lsy.tb, is where k1 = 1.3 for a horizontal bar with > 300mm of concrete cast below it and k1 = 1.0 for all other bars; k2 = (132 – db)/100 ; k3= 1.0 ‐ 0.15(cd – db)/db (but 0.7≤ k3 ≤1.0) cd is the smaller of the concrete cover to the bar or half the clear distance to the next parallel bar; f′c shall not be taken to exceed 65 MPa AS3600‐2009: (§13.1.2.2) b d k1 29 ≥ c 2 b sy 3 1 sy.tb 5 . 0 f k d f k k L ′ =
  • 19. • The development length Lsy.t may be taken as the basic development length or may be refined to include the beneficial effects of confinements by transverse steel or transverse pressure and is where k4 = 1 ‐ KÎť (but 0.7≤ k4 ≤ 1.0); and k5 = 1.0 ‐ 0.04ρp (but 0.7≤ k5 ≤1.0); AS3600-2009 ctd (§13.1.2.3) sy.tb 5 4 sy.t L k k L =
  • 20. FIGURE 13.1.2.3(B) VALUES OF K FOR BEAMS AND SLABS K = 0.1 K = 0.05 K = 0 sy.tb 5 4 sy.t L k k L = k4 = 1 - KÎť where Îť = (ÎŁAtr − ÎŁAtr.min)/As ; ÎŁAtr = cross-sectional area of the transverse reinforcement along the development length Lsy.t ÎŁAtr.min = cross-sectional area of the minimum transverse reinforcement, which may be taken as 0.25As for beams and 0 for slabs As = cross-sectional area of a single bar of diameter db being anchored K = is a factor that accounts for the position of the bars being anchored relative to the transverse reinforcement, with values given below: AS3600-2009 ctd (§13.1.2.3)
  • 21. • The development length Lst to develop a stress σst lower than fsy : When calculating σst don’t forget to include the strength reduction factor (φ = 0.8). If T* is the design ultimate tensile force in the reinforcement caused by the factored design loads, then: and therefore AS3600-2009 ctd (§13.1.2.3) b sy st sy.t st 12d f L L ≥ = σ st st st st * * A T A T φ σ σ φ ≥ ≤
  • 22. • The development length of a deformed bar with a standard hook or cog: AS3600-2009 ctd (§13.1.2.3) (a) Standard hook (180° bend) (b) Standard hook (135° bend). 0.5Lsy.t ≥ 4db or 70mm did X 0.5Lsy.t did /2 X (c) Standard cog (90° bend). 0.5Lsy.t did /2 X A A A X X X did 0.5did 0.5Lsy.t 0.5Lsy.t 0.5Lsy.t ≥ 4db or 70mm (a) Standard hook (180° bend) (b) Standard hook (135° bend) (c) Standard cog (90° bend)
  • 23. WORKED EXAMPLE: Consider the minimum development length required for the two terminated 28 mm diameter bottom bars in the beam shown below. Take fsy = 500 MPa; f’c = 32 MPa; cover to the 28 mm bars c = 40 mm; and the clear spacing between the bottom bars a = 60 mm. The cross‐sectional area of one N28 bar is As = 620 mm2 and with N12 stirrups at 150 mm centres, Atr = 110 mm2. AS3600-2009 P P Lsy.t 12mm stirrups at 150mm ctrs Two terminated bars A A Elevation Section A-A Lsy.t + d Lsy.t + D
  • 24. For bottom bars: k1 = 1.0; For 28 mm diameter bars: k2 = (132 – 28)/100 = 1.04; The concrete confinement dimension, cd = a/2 = 30 mm, and therefore k3 = 1.0 – 0.15(30 – 28)/28 = 0.99 The basic development length is therefore The minimum number of stirrups that can be located within the basic development length is 7. Therefore, ÎŁAtr = 7 x 110 = 770 mm2. Taking ÎŁAtr.min = 0.25As = 155 mm2, the parameter Îť = (770 – 155)/620 = 0.99 Worked Example ctd (§13.1.2.3) ) 29 ( mm 1178 32 04 . 1 28 500 99 . 0 0 . 1 5 . 0 1 sy.tb b d k L > = × × × × = c 2 b sy 3 1 sy.tb 5 . 0 f k d f k k L ′ =
  • 25. From Figure 13.1.2B, K = 0.05 (as it is the two interior bars that are being developed) and therefore It is assumed that in this location the transverse pressure perpendicular to the anchored bar (ρp) is zero, and hence k5 = 1.0. From Eq. 13.1.2.3: Worked Example ctd (§13.1.2.3) sy.tb 5 4 sy.t L k k L = 95 . 0 99 . 0 05 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 4 = × − = − = Îť K k . mm 1120 1178 0 . 1 95 . 0 . 5 4 . = × × = = bt sy t sy L k k L The strength of the beam must be checked at the point where the two bars are terminated (ie. at Lsy.t+d from the constant moment region)
  • 26. Lapped Splices for bars in tension (13.2.2 Lapped Splices for bars in tension (13.2.2 – – AS3600 AS3600‐ ‐2009): 2009): PLANAR VIEW sL a db sb Lsy.t.lap Note: For the purposes of determining cd, the dimension a shall be taken equal to (sL-db) irrespective of the value of sb. cd, = min (a/2, ccrit ) (i) 100% of bars spliced (no staggered splice) cd, = min (a/2, ccrit ) (ii) 50% staggered splices PLANAR VIEW Lsy.t.lap ≥ 0.3Lsy.t.lap a sL sb Note: For the purposes of determining cd, the dimension a shall be taken equal to 2sL irrespective of the value of sb. (a/2, c ) (a/2, c ) cd = min (a/2, c) (i) 100% of bars spliced (no staggered splices) (ii) 50% staggered splices cd = min (a/2, c)
  • 27. Lapped Splices for bars in tension: Lapped Splices for bars in tension: AS3600‐2009: §13.2.2 sy.t 7 sy.t.lap L k L = b d k1 29 ≥ k7 shall be taken as 1.25, unless As provided is greater than As required and no more than one‐half of the tensile reinforcement at the section is spliced, in which case k7 = 1. In narrow elements or members (such as beam webs and columns), the tensile lap length (Lsy.t.lap) shall be not less than the larger of k7 Lsy.t and Lsy.t +1.5sb, where sb is the clear distance between bars of the lapped splice as shown in Figure 8.15.
  • 28. Consider the lapped splice requirements for N12 bars at 200 mm centres in the bottom of a slab. Cover = 20 mm. Concrete strength = 25 MPa. AS3600‐2009: ACI 318‐08: (Refined – Clause 12.2.3) b e t d lap d f f L c y 1 . 2 3 . 1 3 . 1 ′ = = Îť ψ ψ l 12 25 0 . 1 1 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 500 3 . 1 × × × × × × = b d 9 . 61 mm 743 = = b b tr b s e t d lap d d K c f f L ) ( 1 . 1 3 . 1 3 . 1 c y + ′ = = Îť ψ ψ ψ l 12 ) 12 0 26 ( 25 0 . 1 1 . 1 8 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 500 3 . 1 × + × × × × × × = b d 7 . 43 mm 524 = = ACI 318‐08: (Simplified – Clause 12.2.2) c 2 b sy 3 1 sy.tb sy.t.lap 5 . 0 25 . 1 f k d f k k L L ′ = = 25 2 . 1 12 500 90 . 0 0 . 1 5 . 0 25 . 1 × × × × × × = b d 9 . 46 mm 563 = = ) 2001 3600 AS in 7 . 30 mm 369 . . ( − = b d f c
  • 29. Detailing of beams: Anchorage of longitudinal reinforcement: Favorable anchorage Elevation Section Unfavorable anchorage Transverse tension Possible cracks Normal pressure C C T T T When bottom reinforcement is terminated away from the support, the diagonal compression in the web improves the anchorage.
  • 30. Current wording: “The design for flexural strength and detailing of flexural reinforcement and pretensioned tendons at termination shall be extended from the theoretical cut‐off point, or debonding point, by a length of 1.0D + Lsy.t, or 1.0D + Lpt, where D is the member depth at the theoretical cut‐off point or theoretical debonding point” ‐ Problem 1: The wording does not make sense ‐ Problem 2: The rule is incorrect – a bar does not have to develop its yield stress at the theoretical cut‐off point Amended wording: “Where flexural reinforcement and pretensioned tendons are to be terminated, the bars or tendons shall be extended from the theoretical cut‐ off point, or theoretical debonding point, by a length of at least 1.0D + Lst, or 1.0D + Lpt, respectively, where D is the member depth at the theoretical cut‐off point or theoretical debonding point” AS3600-2009 Clause 8.1.10.1
  • 31. Detailing of beams (ctd): tilted anchorage near horizontal anchorage diagonal compression Reaction pressure Reaction pressure Sections and Elevations Plan The transverse tension that may cause splitting in the plane of a hooked anchorage at a support can be overcome at a beam support simply by tilting the hook and exposing it to the normal reaction pressure.
  • 32. Detailing of beams (ctd): If the bearing length at a support is small and close to the free end of a member, a sliding shear failure along a steep inclined crack may occur. Additional small diameter bars may be required perpendicular to the potential failure plane Potential failure surface Inclined clamping bars
  • 33. Detailing of beams (ctd): Where the length available for anchorage is small, mechanical anchorages in the form of welded cross‐bars or end plates may be used. Common in precast elements, corbels, brackets and at other support points. welded cross‐bar end plate (a) (b) (c) recessed angle
  • 34. Detailing of beams (ctd): In short span members, where load is carried to the support by arch action, it is essential that all bottom reinforcement (the tie of the arch) is fully developed at each support. Closely spaced transverse stirrups can be used to improve anchorage of the tie reinforcement. Compressive strut Tie Do NOT terminate any bottom bars Binding reinforcement Anchorage is critical Member Centreline
  • 35. Detailing of beams (ctd): Concentrating top steel at a support in a beam within the web can lead to crack control problems in the adjacent slab (Leonhardt et al.) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 100 200 300 400 500 Load (kN) Crack width (0.01 mm)) As = 1030 mm2 As = 1020 mm2
  • 36. Detailing of beams (ctd): Anchorage of Stirrups: ž Tension in stirrup is more or less constant over height of vertical leg. Therefore, all points on vertical leg must be fully developed ž Stirrup anchorages should be located in the compressive zone and be shown on the structural drawings. ž The area of shear reinforcement required at a particular cross‐ section should be provided for a distance D from that cross‐section in the direction of decreasing shear (AS3600‐2009 – Clause 8.2.12.3). Compressive top chord (concrete) Vertical ties (stirrups) Inclined web struts (concrete) Tensile bottom chord (Ast)
  • 37. Detailing of beams (ctd): Types of Stirrups: (a) Incorrect Inadequate anchorage A 90° cog is ineffective if the cover concrete is lost Tensile lapped splice (c) Satisfactory Compressive side Tensile side (b) Undesirable (but satisfactory) In regions where ductility is required, the open stirrups (commonly used in post‐tensioned beams) do not confine the compressive concrete
  • 38. Detailing of beams (ctd): Types of Stirrups: cracks Ts Cd Compression strut Cd Ts Ts Rigid Flexible ž Multi‐leg stirrups should be used in members with wide webs to avoid the undesirable distribution of diagonal compression shown ž Multi‐leg sturrups better control shear cracking and help maintain shear transfer though aggregate interlock
  • 39. Detailing of beams (ctd): Types of Stirrups: ž Multi‐leg stirrups are also far better for controlling the longitudinal splitting cracks (known as dowel cracks) that precipitate bond failure of the longitudinal bars in the shear span. ž Often this critical shear crack occurs where bottom bars are terminated in the shear span. Additional shear reinforcement may be required in this region (Clause 8.1.10.5 – AS3600‐2009). Dowel crack
  • 40. Detailing of beams (ctd): Crack control provided by shear reinforcement (Leonhardt et al): 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0 200 400 600 Load P (kN) Maximum crack width (mm) 1 2 3 4 (mm)
  • 41. Detailing of beams (ctd): Support and Loading Points: ž When the support is at the soffit of a beam or slab, the diagonal compression passes directly into the support as shown ž When the support is at the top of the beam, the diagonal compression must be carried back up to the support via an internal tie. ž It is essential that adequately anchored reinforcement be included to act as the tension tie and the reinforcement must be anchored into the support (a) Support under support Internal tie (b) Support over
  • 42. Detailing of beams (ctd): Slab supported by upturned beam: (a) Incorrect detail ž The vertical component of the diagonal compression in the slab (i.e. the reaction from the slab) must be carried in tension up to the top of the upturned beam. ž Don’t rely on the unreinforced surface to carry this tension Unreinforced surface (b) Correct detail
  • 43. Detailing of beams (ctd): Beam‐to‐beam connection: ž The area of additional suspension reinforcement is Primary girder R* suspension reinforcement (a) Section Secondary beam Compression strut in secondary beam Suspension reinforcement (b) Primary girder ‐ Elevation Stirrups for shear (c) Primary girder – Truss analogy R* sy sr f R A φ * =
  • 44. Detailing of beams (ctd): Beam‐to‐beam connection: ž When a load is applied to the underside of a reinforced concrete beam, some device must be used to transfer this hanging load to the top of the beam (b) Internal rods
  • 45. Detailing of beams (ctd): Half‐Joint or dapped‐end joint: (a) Half joint (b) Strut and tie model Reinforcement detail Hairpin reinforcement Suspension reinforcement (c) Alternative strut and tie model Reinforcement detail
  • 46. • • Excessive cracking Excessive cracking due to due to restrained deformation restrained deformation or or external external loads loads is a common cause of damage in reinforced concrete is a common cause of damage in reinforced concrete structures. structures. • • Excessive cracking Excessive cracking in the hardened concrete can be avoided in the hardened concrete can be avoided by including sufficient reinforcement at sufficien by including sufficient reinforcement at sufficiently close tly close spacings spacings. . • • Shrinkage Shrinkage causes a causes a gradual widening of existing cracks gradual widening of existing cracks and and time time‐ ‐dependent cracking dependent cracking in previously uncracked regions. in previously uncracked regions. Detailing for Crack Control Detailing for Crack Control • • The The minimum quantities of reinforcement minimum quantities of reinforcement specified for crack specified for crack control in AS3600 may not be what is actually requ control in AS3600 may not be what is actually required in all ired in all circumstances. circumstances.
  • 47. • • The The width of a crack width of a crack depends on depends on ‐ ‐ the quantity, orientation and distribution of the the quantity, orientation and distribution of the reinforcing steel crossing the crack; reinforcing steel crossing the crack; ‐ ‐ concrete cover and member size; concrete cover and member size; ‐ ‐ the bond between concrete and reinforcement the bond between concrete and reinforcement in the vicinity of the crack; in the vicinity of the crack; ‐ ‐ the deformation characteristics of concrete; and the deformation characteristics of concrete; and ‐ ‐ the shrinkage strain (and therefore the time after the shrinkage strain (and therefore the time after crack formation). crack formation). ‐ ‐ the cause of the crack the cause of the crack ‐ ‐ the degree of restraint the degree of restraint • • Often significantly more reinforcement than the minimum specified amount is required.
  • 48. Crack spacing, s, varies between 0.5d and 1.5d and depends on - steel area and distribution - cover Crack width, w, depends on - steel stress - bar diameter and bar spacing - cover - adjacent crack spacings and the average crack spacing decreases with time due to shrinkage and increases with time due to shrinkage d Maximum crack widths increase with time by a factor of between 2 and 4 Service loads Flexural cracks Flexural cracking:
  • 49. Simplified Approach for Flexural Crack Control in AS3600‐2009 (Clause 8.6.1 and 9.4.1): For reinforced concrete beams and slabs, cracking is deemed to be controlled (crack widths will be less than 0.3 mm) if each of the following is satisfied: (a) the quantity of tensile reinforcement in a beam or slab provides an ultimate strength at least 20% higher than the cracking moment calculated assuming σcs = 0; (b) the distance from the side or soffit of the member to the centre of the nearest longitudinal bar shall not exceed 100 mm; (c) The centre‐to‐centre spacing of bars near a tension face of a beam or slab shall not exceed 300 mm for a beam and the lesser of two times the slab thickness and 300 mm for a slab. (d) The stress in the tensile steel is less than a limiting value (as follows):
  • 50. Simplified Approach for Flexural Crack Control in AS3600‐2009 (Clause 8.6.1 and 9.4.1): Ctd For members subject primarily to flexure, the calculated steel stress caused by the serviceability design moment shall not exceed the larger of the maximum steel stresses given in Tables 8.6.1(A) and 8.6.1(B) for beams and Tables 9.4.1(A) and 9.4.1(B) for slabs. Table 8.6.1(A): Maximum steel stress for Table 8.6.1(B): Maximum steel stress for tension or flexure in r.c. beams. flexure in r.c. beams. Nominal bar diameter (mm) Maximum steel stress (MPa) Centre-to-centre spacing (mm) Maximum steel stress (MPa) 10 360 50 360 12 330 100 320 16 280 150 280 20 240 200 240 24 210 250 200 28 185 300 160 32 160 36 140 40 120
  • 51. Simplified Approach for Flexural Crack Control in AS3600‐2009 (Clause 8.6.1 and 9.4.1): Ctd For members subject primarily to tension, the calculated steel stress caused by the serviceability design actions shall not exceed the maximum steel stresses given in Tables 8.6.1(A) for beams and Tables 9.4.1(A) for slabs. Table 9.4.1(A): Maximum steel stress for Table 9.4.1(B): Maximum steel stress for flexure in r.c. slabs. flexure in r.c. slabs. Maximum steel stress (MPa) for overall depth Ds (mm) Nominal bar diameter (mm) ≤ 300 > 300 Centre-to-centre spacing (mm) Maximum steel stress (MPa) 6 375 450 50 360 8 345 400 100 320 10 320 360 150 280 12 300 330 200 240 16 265 280 250 200 20 240 300 160 24 210
  • 52. Restrained Shrinkage Cracking in Slabs Restrained Shrinkage Cracking in Slabs: : ™ ™ Provided that Provided that bonded reinforcement bonded reinforcement at at reasonable spacing reasonable spacing crosses crosses the crack and that the member does not the crack and that the member does not deflect excessively, flexural deflect excessively, flexural cracks are usually well controlled in reinforced concrete cracks are usually well controlled in reinforced concrete beams and beams and slabs. slabs. ™ ™ In contrast, In contrast, direct tension cracks direct tension cracks due to restrained shrinkage and due to restrained shrinkage and temperature changes frequently lead to serviceability prob temperature changes frequently lead to serviceability problems, lems, particularly in regions of low moment. particularly in regions of low moment. ™ ™ Such cracks usually extend completely through the member and a Such cracks usually extend completely through the member and are re more parallel sided than flexural cracks. more parallel sided than flexural cracks. ™ ™ If uncontrolled, these cracks can become very wide and lead to If uncontrolled, these cracks can become very wide and lead to waterproofing and corrosion problems. waterproofing and corrosion problems. ™ ™ They can also disrupt the integrity and the structural action They can also disrupt the integrity and the structural action of the slab. of the slab.
  • 53. Flexural cracks One‐way floor slab supported on beams Full depth restrained shrinkage cracks ž Usually more steel is required to control the restrained shrinkage cracks than is required to control the flexural cracks and provide adequate strength. The slab is restrained by beams and shrinkage induces tension in the slab in the direction of the beams
  • 54. Restrained Shrinkage Cracking in Slabs Restrained Shrinkage Cracking in Slabs Ctd Ctd: : ™ ™ In the primary direction, shrinkage will cause small increases in the widths of the many fine flexural cracks and may cause additional flexure type cracks in the previously uncracked regions. ™ However, in the secondary direction, which is in effect a direct tension situation, shrinkage generally causes a few widely spaced cracks which penetrate completely through the slab. ™ If the amount of reinforcement crossing a direct tension crack is small, yielding of the steel will occur and a wide, unserviceable crack will result. To avoid this eventuality, the minimum steel ratio, ρmin is where . For 32 MPa concrete, ρmin = 0.0034. ™ For a serviceable crack width, significantly more steel than this is required. sy ct st f f d b A 2 . 1 min min = ⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ = ρ ' 25 . 0 c ct f f =
  • 55. Crack Control in Slabs Crack Control in Slabs – –AS3600 AS3600‐ ‐2009: 2009: ™ Where the ends of a slab are restrained and the slab is not free to expand or contract in the secondary direction, the minimum area of reinforcement in the restrained direction is given by either Eq. 1a, 1b or 1c, as appropriate (see below). ™ For a slab fully enclosed within a building except for a brief period of weather exposure during construction: (i) where a strong degree of control over cracking is required: (ii) where a moderate degree of control over cracking is required: (iii) where a minor degree of control over cracking is required: ( ) ) a 2 . 9 ( 10 ) 5 . 2 0 . 6 ( 3 min − × − = D b A cp s σ ( ) ) b 2 . 9 ( 10 ) 5 . 2 5 . 3 ( 3 min − × − = D b A cp s σ ( ) ) c 2 . 9 ( 10 ) 5 . 2 75 . 1 ( 3 min − × − = D b A cp s σ (1a) (1b) (1c)
  • 56. ™ For all other slab surface conditions in Exposure Classification A1 and for exposure classification A2, Eq. 1a applies where a strong degree of control over cracking is required for appearance or where cracks may reflect through finishes and Eq. 1b applies where a moderate degree of control over cracking is required and where cracks are inconsequential or hidden from view. ™ For Exposure Classifications B1, B2, C1 and C2, Eq. 1a always applies. ™ The minimum steel area given by Eq. 1c is appropriate in an unrestrained direction where the slab is free to expand or contract. ™ In the primary direction of a one‐way slab or in each direction of a two‐way slab, the minimum quantity of reinforcement is the greater of the minimum quantity required for the strength limit state or 75% of the minimum area required by Eqs. 1a, 1b or 1c, as appropriate. ( ) ) a 2 . 9 ( 10 ) 5 . 2 0 . 6 ( 3 min − × − = D b A cp s σ ( ) ) b 2 . 9 ( 10 ) 5 . 2 5 . 3 ( 3 min − × − = D b A cp s σ (1a) (1b)
  • 57. Consider a slab restrained at each end. With time, restrained shrinkage cracks occur at roughly regular centres depending on the amount of reinforcement: (a) Portion of restrained member after all cracking (c) Steel stress after all shrinkage cracking (b) Average concrete stress after all shrinkage
  • 58. Typical values: Consider a 140 mm thick, 4m long slab fully‐restrained at both ends and symmetrically reinforced with N12 bars at 250 mm centres top and bottom. Hence, As= 900 mm2/m and ρ = As/Ac = 0.00643. L = 4 m 140 mm For 25 MPa concrete with a final shrinkage strain of 0.0007 and typical material properties, a shrinkage cracking analysis of this restrained slab indicates 4 or 5 full depth cracks within the 4 m length with the maximum final crack width about 0.3 mm.
  • 59. If p = 0 : p = As/Ac 2.8 mm one large unserviceable crack If p = 0.0035 ≈ 0.6 – 0.7 mm about three unserviceable (?) cracks If p = 0.006 ≈ 0.3 – 0.4 mm Four or five serviceable (?) cracks 4 m 140 mm
  • 60. Detailing of columns: Lapped compressive splices: Normal fitment spacing, s Additional fitment spacing, s’ < 4c R Additional fitments at compressive splice Tension at cranked bars Unsatisfactory tension splice in thin wall
  • 61. Detailing of columns: Typical tie arrangements in columns: AS3600‐2009 requirements for restraining single longitudinal bars in columns: (i) Every corner bar; (ii) All bars ‐ where bars are spaced at centres > 150 mm; (iii) At least every alternate bar ‐ where bar centres ≤ 150mm. For bundled bars – each bundle must be restrained. All longitudinal bars in these columns are restrained at (i) a bend in a fitment of 135° or less; or (ii) at a fitment hooks with included angle of 135° or less, as shown.
  • 62. Detailing of columns: Minimum bar diameters for fitments (AS3600‐2009): 6 10 12 16 12 Single bars up to 20 Single bars 24 to 28 Single bars 28 to 36 Single bar 40 Bundled bars Minimum bar diameter for fitment and helix (mm) Longitudinal bar diameter (mm) Maximum spacing of fitments (AS3600‐2009): The spacing of fitments (or the pitch of a helix) should not exceed the smaller of: Dc and 15db for single bars 0.5Dc and 7.5db for bundled bars
  • 63. Detailing of Beam‐column Connections: Knee Connections (or two‐member connections): (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 8.37 Two-member connections.
  • 64. Detailing of Beam‐column Connections: Knee Connections under “Opening” Moment: M M C C T T T 2 M M (a) Internal forces (b) Crack pattern M M M M (a) Unsatisfactory (b) Unsatisfactory M M (c) Potentially satisfactory f sy sy st f sy sv f f A f T A . . 2 2 φ φ = =
  • 65. Detailing of Beam‐column Connections: Knee Connections under “Opening” Moment – Suggested detail: Diagonal flexural bars Diagonal stirrups M M
  • 66. Detailing of Beam‐column Connections: Knee Connections under “Closing” Moment: M M T T C C T 2 M M (a) Internal forces (b) Crack pattern M M (a) Wall or slab connection (when p ≤ fct.f /fsy) (b) Beam to column knee connection M M
  • 67. Detailing of Beam‐column Connections: Three‐member connections: (a) Internal forces (b) Crack pattern High bond stress Poor anchorage conditions
  • 68. Detailing of Beam‐column Connections: Three‐member connections – Reinforcement detail: Larger diameter bar to distribute bearing stresses in bend Ties to carry diagonal tension, to control vertical splitting and to confine the concrete core
  • 69. Detailing of Beam‐column Connections: Four‐member connections: (a) Internal forces (b) Crack pattern (c) Reinforcement detail
  • 70. Detailing of Corbels: (a) Strut-and-tie action (b) Reinforcement detail (c) Welded primary steel Crack control steel Main or primary tensile reinforcement Cross bar to distribute bearing stresses in bend T C ℓweld=ždb ℓweld=ždb tweld=db/2 tweld=db/2 db db Primary tensile reinforcement Anchor bar (d) Satisfactory weld details (17) Welded anchor bar (see Fig 8.46d) Primary tension steel
  • 71. Design of Corbels: T C θ d D a V* Figure 8.47 ≥ d/2 ) 8 . 0 ( tan * = = = φ φ θ sy s f A V T θ φ tan * sy s f V A = ∴ ) 6 . 0 ( 9 . 0 = ′ = st c c s st u st A f C φ β φ φ Tie: Strut: ) 0 . 1 3 . 0 ( cot 66 . 0 0 . 1 1 2 ≤ ≤ + = s s β θ β 2 / s h A A ≥ Park and Paulay suggest that a good first estimate of corbel dimensions is obtained from: and ACI318‐08 suggests c w f d b V ′ ≤ 56 . 0 / * sy c w s sy c f f d b A f f d a / 2 . 0 / / 04 . 0 and 0 . 1 / ′ ≤ ≤ ′ ≤
  • 72. Design of Corbels: d D 400 mm D/2 200 mm T* C* (b) θ V* dc=400/sinθ = 541 mm d D 400 mm V* = 500kN D/2 200 mm (a) bw = 300 mm MPa 32 = ′ c f MPa 500 = sy f Cover = 30 mm Bearing plate = 200 x 300 mm in plan dc = 200/sinθ = 270 mm
  • 73. Design of Corbels: From : 56 . 0 / * c w f d b V ′ ≤ mm 526 32 56 . 0 300 10 500 3 = × × × ≥ d With D = d + cover + 0.5 bar dia and assuming 20 mm diameter bars, take D = 570 mm and therefore d = 530 mm. From the geometry: and Try 4 N20 bars (1240 mm2) Now The strut efficiency factor: and 400 ) 90 tan( 100 tan θ θ − − = d o 7 . 47 = ∴ θ 2 3 mm 1138 7 . 47 tan 500 8 . 0 10 500 = × × × = s A OK / 122 . 0 0078 . 0 / ∴ ′ = = sy c w s f f d b A 65 . 0 cot 66 . 0 0 . 1 1 2 = + = θ βs kN 911 81150 32 9 . 0 65 . 0 6 . 0 = × × × × = u stC φ OK kN 743 cos / * * ∴ = = > θ V C
  • 74. Design of Corbels: 285 285 4 N20 3 N12 stirrups ELEVATION PLAN 285 285 4 N20 3 N12 Stirrups N28 welded cross-bar ELEVATION PLAN N24 cross-bar (welded to N20s)
  • 75. JOINTS IN STRUCTURES: Joints are introduced into concrete structures for two main reasons: 1) As stopping places in the concreting operation. The location of these construction joints depends on the size and production capacity of the construction site and work force; 2) To accommodate deformation (expansion, contraction, rotation, settlement) without local distress or loss of integrity of the structure. Such joints include: control joints (contraction joints); expansion joints; structural joints (such as hinges, pin and roller joints); shrinkage strips; and isolation joints. The location of these joints depends on the anticipated movements of the structure during its lifetime and the resulting effects on structural behaviour.
  • 76. Construction Joints: Steel dowels to improve shear strength 1st pour 2nd pour Waterstop where water tightness is required (a) Butt joint (b) Keyed joint (c) Doweled joint
  • 77. Control Joints (or Contraction Joints): Debond dowel to ensure free contraction Saw cut > 0.2 t and 20 mm ≈0.75 t Discontinue every second bar if necessary so that p < 0.002 (a) Saw-cut joint in slab on ground (b) Wall (t < 200 mm) (d) Wall (t ≥ 200 mm) (c) Doweled joint t ≈0.75 t Discontinue every second bar if necessary so that p < 0.002
  • 78. Typical control joint locations: Control joint locations (a) Wall elevation (b) Balcony plan
  • 79. Alternative shrinkage strip details: Shrinkage strip Shrinkage strip
  • 80. Expansion joint details: ≥ 25 mm Joint locations (a) Double column and beams (b) Half joint (c) Building plans – joint locations (a) Double column and beams
  • 81. Alternative structural hinge joints at base of a column: Elastic, easily compressible material Mesnager hinge Confinement steel
  • 82. THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ?