Our presentation at the 55th annual Candian Economics Association conference by our economist Graham Dobbs on the changing occupational structures and COVID-19's impacts.
7. 7 The Canadian labour force survey uses a 6-
month rotating panel design, allowing up to 5/6
of the sample to be captured longitudinally
Statistics Canada, 2017
8. 8
Longitudinal Sample of LFS 2019-2020
Demographics and Exclusions
10 Provinces
Ages 20-64
Individuals
matched by
rotation, gender,
age, individual
ID
Removal of
imputed records Checks for
misidentification
9. 9
Methods
Occupational Mobility Indicator
Within Occupation Groups Mobility
=
�
𝑖𝑖
𝑊𝑊𝑖𝑖,𝑡𝑡 𝐼𝐼𝑡𝑡(𝑁𝑁𝑗𝑗,𝑡𝑡−𝑙𝑙 ≠ 𝑁𝑁𝐽𝐽,𝑡𝑡, 𝑂𝑂𝑗𝑗,𝑡𝑡−𝑙𝑙 = 𝑂𝑂𝐽𝐽,𝑡𝑡)
(Weighted count of movements within a broad occupation group, identified by a 4-digit occupation change)
Across Occupation Groups Mobility
=
�
𝑖𝑖
𝑊𝑊𝑖𝑖,𝑡𝑡 𝐼𝐼𝑡𝑡( 𝑂𝑂𝑗𝑗,𝑡𝑡−𝑙𝑙 ≠ 𝑂𝑂𝐽𝐽,𝑡𝑡)
(Weighted count of movements across broad occupation groups, identified by a 1-digit occupation change)
W: Weight
I: indicatorfunction
i: individual
j , J : origin occupation,destinationoccupation
t: presentperiod
O: broad occupationalgroup, 1-digit occupationcode
N: 4-digitoccupationcode
10. 10
Compared to pre-COVID levels, what are
the differences in movement within the
10 broad occupational groupings?
15. 15
Most common across occupation
changes by origin occupation,
2020
Origin Occupation Group 1st Destination 2nd Destination 3rd Destination
Management Sales and service Business, finance, Trades, transport, equip
Business, finance, admin. Sales and service Management Education, law, social, go
Natural and applied sciences Business, finance, admin. Management *Sales and service
Health Education, law, social, govSales and service Business, finance, admin
Education, law, social, gov't services Business, finance, admin. Health Sales and service
Arts, culture, rec, sport Sales and service Business, finance, Education, law, social, go
Sales and service Business, finance, admin. Management Trades, transport, equip
Trades, transport, equipment Sales and service Management Manufacturing and utilit
Natural resources and agriculture Trades, transport, equipmManagement *Natural and applied scie
Manufacturing and utilities Trades, transport, equipmSales and service *Business, finance, admi
Top 3 Occupations Transitions(Descending)
*New Occupation Group ranked in 2020
16. 16
Compared to pre-COVID levels, what are
the net movements in and out of broad
occupational groups?
17. 17
Methods
Occupational Mobility Indicators
Net Mobility Flows (Between Occupation Groups)
=
Occupational inflow - Occupation outflow
=
Weighted count of movements into a destination occupation - Weighted count of movements
from an origin occupation
=
∑𝑖𝑖 𝑊𝑊𝑖𝑖,𝑡𝑡−𝑙𝑙 𝐼𝐼𝑡𝑡−1(𝑂𝑂𝑗𝑗,𝑡𝑡−𝑙𝑙 ≠ 𝑂𝑂𝐽𝐽,𝑡𝑡) - ∑𝑖𝑖 𝑊𝑊𝑖𝑖,𝑡𝑡 𝐼𝐼𝑡𝑡(𝑂𝑂𝑗𝑗,𝑡𝑡−𝑙𝑙 ≠ 𝑂𝑂𝐽𝐽,𝑡𝑡)
W: Weight
I: indicator function
i: individual
j , J : origin occupation, destination occupation
t: present period
O: broad occupational group, 1-digit occupation code
N: 4-digit occupation code
18. 18 Net movements between occupational groups in
2019 and 2020 are mixed
19. 19 Net movements between occupational groups in
2019 and 2020 are mixed
20. 20 Net movements between occupational groups in
2019 and 2020 are mixed
21. 21
1 2 3
Conclusion & Discussion
Occupational Mobility
Mobility within and
across occupation
groups was greater
in 2020
Sales & Service,
Business, Finance &
Admin. and
Management
occupations saw the
most inbound
occupational changes
Occupations
directly impacted
by COVID-19 saw a
higher rate of net
flows relative to
2019
22. 22
Future Research
Exploring Occupational Mobility
Seeing both within and across mobility
increase, what are the wage effects of
large occupational redistributions in 2021?
Does occupational mobility occur more at
certain wage or tenure levels?
Is occupational mobility more prevalent in
recent decades?
24. 24
1. Autor, David H. “Work of the Past, Work of the Future.” AEA Papers and Proceedings 109 (May 2019): 1–32.
https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20191110.
2. Bechichi, Nagui, Stéphanie Jamet, Gustave Kenedi, Robert Grundke, and Mariagrazia Squicciarini. “Occupational Mobility, Skills and Training Needs,”
April 26, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/30a12738-en.
3. Brochu, Pierre, Jonathan Créchet, and Zechuan Deng. “Labour Market Flows and Worker Trajectories in Canada during COVID-19.” Working Paper.
Working Paper Series, 2020. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/225256.
4. Gibbons, Robert, and Michael Waldman. “Task-Specific Human Capital.” The American Economic Review 94, no. 2 (2004): 203–7.
5. Government of Canada, Statistics Canada. “Methodology of the Canadian Labour Force Survey,” March 29, 2017.
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/71-526-x/71-526-x2017001-eng.htm.
6. Kambourov, Gueorgui, and Iourii Manovskii. “Occupational Specificity of Human Capital.” International Economic Review 50, no. 1 (2009): 63–115.
7. Lalé, Etienne. “Trends in Occupational Mobility in France: 1982–2009.” Labour Economics 19, no. 3 (June 1, 2012): 373–87.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.03.005.
8. Maczulskij, Terhi. “Occupational Mobility of Routine Workers.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, March 22, 2021.
https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3808453.
9. Nawakitphaitoon, Kritkorn. “Occupational Human Capital and Wages: The Role of Skills Transferability Across Occupations.” Journal of Labor Research
35, no. 1 (March 1, 2014): 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-013-9172-2.
10. Sullivan, Paul. “Empirical Evidence on Occupation and Industry Specific Human Capital.” Labour Economics 17, no. 3 (June 1, 2010): 567–80.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2009.11.003.