An organization is its language. Large organisations will often create a common language to work more efficiently together, but such a common language can limit the organisation’s future vision. An organisation’s ability to change, evolve and innovate depends on its ability to change its language. Starting from this provocative idea (from Pangaro and Dubberly), this talk explores what could be such a language for transition.
First, I will demonstrate how language is everywhere in our work as designers and information architects, from creating taxonomies and choosing labels, to designing voice UIs and facilitating conversations…
Then we will look more specifically into the importance of language in projects of transition: What role can language play when you try to change and improve a system or organisation? And how can you influence this process of transition by carefully choosing the right language? By looking at examples from the real world, Victor Klemperer’s analysis of the language of the Third Reich (“LTI”), and Trump’s smart use of rhetorical linguistic devices, we learn how language really shapes the way we think, shapes our perspective on society and the world. I will present some linguistic techniques you can apply in your projects of transition, such as metaphors, foregrounding/backgrounding, coming up with neologisms, using noun versus verb phrases… and I will illustrate these with examples taken from projects I have worked on.
To conclude, I will link my linguistic research to the systemic design toolkit we have developed recently. The tools in this toolkit are workshop tools, tools for conversation, and they allow us to zoom out to and design on a system level (versus interactions or service level). This “systemic lens” is indispensable when you want to intervene in a system or organisation, when you want to design for transition.
2. Namahn
Inspiration for this talk
IAC20 - Language for Transition 2
Paul Pangaro Victor Klemperer Kristel Van Ael
3. “An organization is its language.”
Notes on the Role of Leadership and Language in Regenerating organizations
Paul Pangaro
4. Namahn
Importance of language
“An organization consists of conversations.”
“An organization’s language is the basis for all
transactions, for all business. (…) Language affects,
even constitutes the ways people perceive their reality.”
“An organization’s ability to create a (new) language is
synonymous with it’s ability to evolve.”
IAC20 - Language for Transition 4
8. Namahn
Namahn
Systemic design toolkit &
methodology
IAC20 - Language for Transition 8
Systems
thinking infused
with design
thinking
Design thinking
infused with systems
thinking
https://www.systemicdesigntoolkit.org/
10. What role can language play
in projects of transition?
11. Namahn
Structure of my talk
The importance of language in design
The role of language when you are transforming an organisation or system
Mechanisms in language
Towards a language for transition
IAC20 - Language for Transition 11
25. Namahn
Framing in American politics
“Simply changing the language
changes the interpretation.”
(Business insider)
IAC20 - Language for Transition 25
32. Namahn
Trump’s rhetorical linguistic techniques
Superlatives and hyperbole: “yuuuuge”,
“tremendous”, “incredible”, “phenomenally”…
Binaries: criminal aliens vs. hard-working Americans
Repetition: “That’s wrong. They were wrong. It’s the
NYT, they’re always wrong…”
New words: “fake news”…
Grammar: short and simple sentences, verb-heavy
rather than noun-heavy
Register: casual, private talk, used in public, formal
circumstances: “you know”
IAC20 - Language for Transition 32
52. Namahn
Markedness vs. unmarkedness
Zerubavel: “The word choices we make (every day without
even realizing it) expose the subtly encoded ways we talk
about race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, social status
etc.”
Examples: male nurses, working mom…
Techniques:
Foregrounding: “home phone”, “I’m openly straight”,
Backgrounding: “police officer”, “fire fighter”
IAC20 - Language for Transition 52
54. Namahn
Nouns vs. verbs in matters of conflict
Psychological effects of different grammatical structures
(research by Reifen-Tagar and Idan)
The “calming” effect of nouns: a good way to use language to reduce
tension is to rely, whenever possible, on nouns rather than verbs.
E.g. “I am in favour of the removal of settlers/removing settlers
But… verbs are more actionable than nouns!
Thinking in terms of doing/processes, rather than in terms of objects/being
IAC20 - Language for Transition 54
55. “Foster change by adapting the language.
Hold a conversation to create a new language.”
Paul Pangaro
58. Namahn
Foster conversation, using a systemic lens
First, understand the current language of an organisation: terminology, -
abbreviations, metaphors, culture, habits... and limits.
Bring people together in one room (people with different backgrounds,
with their own language and jargon) and start conversations
Use a systemic lens to find the connections between different parts of the
system (including the different languages)
IAC20 - Language for Transition 58
59. Namahn
Create a new language
Mix different languages used in the organisation together, make new, unique
combinations
Create new words
Look for metaphors and “constructive” language to establish new concepts
For your interventions in the system, use verbs (active) rather than nouns (static)
But beware of misuse and manipulation
IAC20 - Language for Transition 59