SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 37
Download to read offline
INITIATE Hold
December 21, 2016 Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
(CXP)
Initiate Hold
Price Target: $21.00
Price (Dec. 20, 2016) $21.43
52-Wk Range $24.63-$19.81
Market Cap ($M) $2,640
ADTV 634,101
Shares Out (M) 123.2
Short Interest Ratio/% Of Float 0.8%
Dividend/Yield $1.00/4.7%
TR to Target 2.7%
2015A 2016E 2017E
Curr. Prior Curr. Prior
FFO
1Q $0.52 $0.44A -- $0.34 --
2Q $0.53 $0.48A -- $0.35 --
3Q $0.47 $0.37A -- $0.36 --
4Q $0.48 $0.37 -- $0.38 --
CY $1.99 $1.66 -- $1.43 --
P/FFO 10.8x 12.9x 15.0x
Consensus
CY -- $1.63 $1.52
FYE Dec
Michael Lewis, CFA
212-319-5659
michael.lewis@suntrust.com
Kevin Cheng, CFA
212-303-4149
kevin.cheng@suntrust.com
Initiating at Hold, $21 PT; Time For
Strategy to Bear Fruit
CXP aims to own primarily class-A office properties in central business district
(CBD) locations within gateway coastal markets, such as New York, San
Francisco and Washington DC. As of 3Q16, it owned interests in 25 properties,
totaling 11.2 million sf across 12 markets. We expect the CBD focus to increase
as remaining non-core markets are exited and proceeds redeployed.
Investment Thesis: After years of dilutive portfolio recycling, earnings should
trough in 2017 before finally proving whether management’s strategy of selling
high cap rate suburban assets to acquire lower cap rate properties in gateway
markets was the best path. The process has been painful (CXP is down 5%
since listing versus +24% for the RMZ) and we think investors may want
to wait a bit longer to see how some remaining dispositions play out,
what 2017 guidance looks like (we think consensus NAV and 2017/18
FFO estimates appear high, perhaps related to re-leasing or disposition/
acquisition timing/pricing), and the magnitude of what we expect to be
a substantial dividend cut. By mid-2017, the focus should be shifting to
earnings growth, supported by potential value-add acquisitions and re-leasing
a few large 2017/2018 move-outs. We are intrigued by the deep discount to
NAV, but think it could take some proven execution to close the gap.
Risks to our thesis that could cause the stock to outperform or underperform
include: 1) disposition timing/pricing, 2) attractiveness of capital redeployment
options, 3) tenant retention/re-leasing activity, 4) magnitude of a potential
dividend cut and 5) fundamental performance of CXP's largest markets.
Estimates: We are introducing a 2016 FFO estimate of $1.51ps ($1.66ps
ex debt extinguishment charges), versus guidance of $1.47-$1.49 ($1.62-
$1.64ps). Our 2017 estimate is $1.48ps, while the consensus is $1.63ps for
2016 and $1.52ps for 2017. We view disposition and capital redeployment
assumptions as key swing variables. There are also some moving pieces on the
leasing side, with 11.4% of property revenue rolling in 2017 and 9.2% in 2018.
Our estimates imply a 16.5% normalized FFO decline in 2016 and a 14.4%
decrease in 2017, followed by 5.0% average annual growth from 2017-2022.
Fairly Valued: CXP trades at an 4% discount to our office coverage universe on
P/2017E FFO and a 4% premium on P/FAD. It trades at a 17% discount to our
$25.95ps NAV estimate (6.5% implied cap rate) versus a 5% average discount
for the group. Our $21 price target implies a 2.7% total return, including
the 4.7% projected dividend yield (which assumes a 33% dividend cut in
2Q17). It is based on a $19 discounted cash flow (50% weighting) and 15%
assumed discount to our projected NAV a year from now (50%). Notably, CXP
has traded at a 15% average discount to consensus NAV since analysts began
picking up coverage of the stock in March 2014, versus an 8% average discount
for the SNL US Office REIT Index over the same period.
SEE PAGE 35 FOR REQUIRED DISCLOSURE INFORMATION Page 1
Equity Research
Please don't forward - Exclusive use: stan.fediuk@suntrust.com
 
 
 
Table of Contents 
Scenario Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 3 
Company Profile ............................................................................................................................................ 4 
Investment Summary .................................................................................................................................... 5 
Potential Investment Positives/Catalysts ..................................................................................................... 6 
Key Challenges/Risks ..................................................................................................................................... 7 
Portfolio Profile ............................................................................................................................................. 8 
Internal Growth........................................................................................................................................... 12 
External Growth .......................................................................................................................................... 14 
Earnings and NAV Estimates ....................................................................................................................... 16 
Balance Sheet and Leverage ....................................................................................................................... 21 
Dividend ...................................................................................................................................................... 24 
Management Team ..................................................................................................................................... 26 
Valuation ..................................................................................................................................................... 31 
Investment Recommendation and Price Target ......................................................................................... 34 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  	
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 2 of 37
Scenario Analysis 
 
Figure 1: CXP Scenario Analysis  
Source: Company documents; STRH 
Target Price Upside Target Price Target Price Downside
$26 $21 $16
Probability Probability Probability
20% 60% 20%
Bull Case STRH Case Bear Case
Steady/lower interest rates and high investor 
demand drive cap rates 15% lower, improving 
disposition pricing and property values. CXP 
decides between more expensive acquisitions 
or repurchasing shares.
Interest rates are range‐bound and cap rates 
stabilize near current levels.  Targeted 
dispositions are essentially complete in 
1H17 and attention turns to capital 
redeployment.
Higher interest rates hurt disposition pricing 
and property values. Though acquisition 
pricing becomes more attractive, some 
potential sellers opt to take properties off 
the market.
Disposition yields are better than expected, 
reducing dilution from remaining portfolio 
recycling.
Assets designated for disposition sell at a 
roughly 8% average cap rate, a sizable 
spread over acquisition cap rates.
Investor demand for non‐core assets 
softens. CXP continues with disposition 
plans, but at higher cap rates with greater 
earnings dilution.
Strong tenant demand drives occupancy 
more than 100 bps higher in 2017 and 
concessions begin to recede.
CXP achieves slightly higher 2017 occupancy 
and concessions remain relative steady.
Amid weaker fundamentals, CXP is only able 
to hold occupancy steady in 2017. Another 
year of significant expirations in 2018 
becomes a growing concern.
Limited new office supply and healthy 
demand lead to better rent spreads than 
expected on new/renewal leases.
Rent spreads on new/renewal leases are 
consistent with what was provided in CXP's 
September investor presentation.
Leasing markets are more challenging than 
expected and lead to softer rent spreads 
and higher capex.
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 3 of 37
Company Profile 
Columbia Property Trust is a publicly‐traded (NYSE: CXP), fully‐integrated and self‐managed office REIT, 
headquartered in Atlanta, GA.  The company was originally founded in 2004 as “Wells REIT II,” a public, 
non‐traded REIT which built a portfolio of high‐yield office properties to support its large dividend 
payout.  CXP elected to publicly list its shares and it began trading on the NYSE on October 10, 2013.  
Notably, Piedmont Office Realty Trust (PDM, $20.49, Hold) was Wells REIT I before going public in 2010. 
 
CXP aims to own and operate primarily class‐A office properties in central business district (CBD) 
locations within gateway coastal markets, such as New York, Washington DC, and San Francisco.  As of 
9/30/16, CXP owned interests in 25 properties (24 wholly‐owned), encompassing 11.2 million square 
feet across 12 markets within 11 states.  We expect the CBD focus (currently 71% of gross real estate 
assets) to increase as several remaining non‐core markets are exited and proceeds redeployed. 
 
Figure 2: Company Profile   
 
Source: Company documents; SNL Financial; Factset; STRH
 
Figure 3: CXP Total Return vs. SNL US REIT Equity and SNL US REIT Office  
Source: Company documents; SNL Financial; Factset; STRH
Institution Name Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Trading Symbol & Exchange CXP-US
Exchange NYSE
Industry Real Estate
Property Type Office
Address 1 One Glenlake Parkway
City, State Atlanta, GA
Zip Code 30328
Phone Number (404) 465-2200
State of Incorporation MD
Web Address http://www.columbiapropertytrust.com
Corporate Headquarters
Company Description
Chief Executive Officer E. Nelson Mills
Chief Financial Officer James A. Fleming
Chief Accounting Officer Wendy W. Gill
Director of Investor Relations Matt Stover
Chairman of the Board John L. Dixon
Management
Stock Price $21.43
Shares Outstanding 123,215
Market Cap ($MMs) $2,640.5
Dividend (annualized) $1.20
Dividend (yield) 5.6%
STRH NAV/share (estimate) $25.95
Company Financial Overview
‐10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Oct‐13
Jan‐14
Apr‐14
Jul‐14
Oct‐14
Jan‐15
Apr‐15
Jul‐15
Oct‐15
Jan‐16
Apr‐16
Jul‐16
Oct‐16
CXP SNL U.S. REIT Equity SNL U.S. REIT Office
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 4 of 37
Investment Summary 
Strategy 
We believe management is essentially targeting some of the same competitive advantages that have 
benefited Boston Properties (BXP, $127.29, Hold), which has posted a 1,122% total return, versus 495% 
for the RMZ, since going public in 1997.  Like BXP, the company is targeting a low‐levered balance sheet 
and a very high‐quality, CBD office portfolio in New York, San Francisco, Washington DC, and likely 
either Boston or Los Angeles.  Notable differences include BXP’s large development pipeline and long 
successful track record.  In that vein, CXP is nearing completion of a largely painful portfolio recycling 
plan to sell high cap rate suburban office properties and invest the proceeds into higher quality CBD 
assets in these target markets.   
 
Making this transition in the public market has been challenging for CXP, as the asset sales have been 
highly dilutive to earnings – though less impactful to NAV, which has been range‐bound.  In retrospect, 
management has suggested two things it could have perhaps done differently.  First, much of the 
portfolio transition might have been better made before going public.  Second, the public listing did not 
dilute shareholders, but a traditional IPO may have provided a stronger initial institutional following 
(62% institutional ownership today), including sell‐side coverage that has been slow to develop.  
Ultimately, the stock has underperformed the RMZ by 29 percentage points since listing (October 
2013) and it remains to be seen whether CXP’s shift in strategy can begin to match BXP’s past success. 
 
Neutral Investment Thesis 
Figure 4 below provides a snapshot of the mixed thesis supporting our Hold rating.  CXP has upgraded its 
property portfolio significantly and earnings should trough in mid‐2017, before the benefits of this 
transition begin to be realized.  Leases signed but not yet commenced should aid future growth, as 
should a positive in‐place rent mark‐to‐market.  The balance sheet and liquidity position are healthy and 
the stock trades at a discount to its office peers, whether based on FFO/FAD multiples or NAV.  There 
remain several dispositions to complete, which come with risks, though there should not be a shortage of 
capital redeployment options, which ideally would be acquisitions but could include stock repurchases. 
 
We are initiating with a Hold rating because, despite these positives, 1) there is uncertainty regarding 
the pricing/timing of dispositions and capital reinvestment, 2) we think Street NAV and 2017/18 FFO 
estimates appear optimistic, particularly in light of a few large likely tenant move‐outs (21% of lease 
revenue expiring in 2017‐2018), 3) the dividend is likely to be cut significantly in early 2017, in our view, 
and 4) we think investors will require some proof of execution/growth before the discount to NAV closes 
relative to many established peers also trading at discounts (for example, CXP trades at a 17% discount 
to NAV versus SLG, VNO and BXP at ‐22%, ‐15% and ‐11%, respectively). 
 
Figure 4: Investment Summary 
Source: STRH 
 
 
Investment Positives Keep an Eye On… 
Focus on high‐quality assets in gateway markets. Relatively high market/property concentration risk.
Embedded growth from signed leases, plus positive rent spreads Large upcoming lease expirations carry a host of risks (re‐leasing timing/cost).
High dividend yield (likely true even after a potential cut). A dividend cut appears likely (we are moding ‐33% in 2Q17).
Strong balance sheet and liquidity. Rising interest rates could negatively impact dispositions/property valuations.
Discounted relative valuation on P/FFO and P/NAV. Remaining dispositions are likely dilutive and subject to pricing/timing risk.
Earnings set to trough in 2017, finally setting the stage for growth. Earnings still moving in the wrong direction for the next few quarters.
Potential share repurchases at discount. Consensus NAV and 2017/2018 FFO estimates appear optimistic to us.
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 5 of 37
Potential Investment Positives/Catalysts 
Nearing Repositioning Targets:  CXP is enduring some near‐term pain because it believes in the long‐
term benefits of a high‐quality, CBD office portfolio in large, gateway office markets.  There is evidence 
that the best assets in key U.S. markets such as New York, San Francisco, Washington DC, Boston and 
Los Angeles outperform over time (CXP can also be a local sharpshooter in Atlanta).  Investor demand 
also tends to be consistently high in these markets, supporting asset values and portfolio liquidity.  
There are no guarantees these markets/assets will outperform over the next several years, but we 
believe earnings growth and stock valuation should be helped simply by the fact that portfolio 
repositioning efforts are winding down and CXP is achieving a clear identity. 
 
Trough Earnings in 2017; Growth In 2018: Essentially, CXP appears poised to soon move beyond one of 
the largest drags on the stock – declining earnings.  We expect earnings to trough in 2017, after roughly 
$1 billion of property dispositions from 2Q16‐2Q17.  FFOps has declined every year since CXP listed in 
October 2013, but we project 5.7% year‐over‐year normalized FFO growth in 2018 and 5.4% average 
annual growth from 2017‐2021 (70bps better than the simple average of our 14‐company office 
coverage universe).  Leases signed, but not yet commenced/paying, plus a positive imbedded rent 
mark‐to‐market should help drive internal growth, while disposition proceeds fund acquisition activity. 
 
Above‐Average Dividend Yield: We expect CXP to reduce its quarterly common dividend from $0.30 
per share ($1.20ps annualized) to $0.20ps in 2Q17 ($0.80ps annualized), which would still imply a 
4.7% yield versus the 3.3% simple average for our office coverage universe.  We estimate the FAD 
payout ratio would be a comfortable 70%‐75% from 2018‐2020, providing some stability to the payout 
as well (though probably not any near‐term growth). 
 
Strong Balance Sheet/Liquidity:  We expect CXP to remain around its 6.5x net debt/EBITDA target for 
the foreseeable future, notwithstanding some timing differences between dispositions and acquisitions.  
This ranks slightly better‐than‐average within our office coverage universe and comfortable, in our view.  
Similarly, debt to gross asset value (35%) ranks better than average and should improve on a relative 
basis, as the company shifts to more lower‐cap rate EBITDA.  Liquidity is strong, with $191 million of 
cash at the end of 3Q16, which could go up before it comes back down, and $401 million of availability 
on its unsecured credit facility ($500 million as of 10/3, following the 80 Park Plaza sale). 
 
Deep Discount to NAV: CXP trades at 15.0x 2017E FFO and 24.7x FAD, versus simple averages of 15.7x 
and 23.7x for our office coverage universe.  These multiples rank 8th
 and 9th
 lowest, respectively, out of 
the 14 companies and seem relatively fair to us, based on the company’s roughly average growth and 
leverage profiles.  However, the 17% discount to our $25.95ps NAV estimate is appealing (the 
consensus NAV is even higher, at $29.40ps).  This is a much deeper discount than the 5% simple 
average for our office coverage universe and wider than CXP’s own 15% average discount since the 
first sell‐side analyst picked up coverage in early 2014. 
 
If attractive acquisition opportunities are not available, the stock is certainly cheap enough relative to 
estimated private market value that share repurchases could be attractive and help close the very 
large discount to NAV (albeit while also shrinking the company).  This discount, and improved 
portfolio quality, could also make CXP an M&A target.  We think this is a relatively low probability 
event at this point, but should be mentioned. 
   
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 6 of 37
Key Challenges/Risks 
Portfolio Transition Not Done Yet:  We are modeling $472 million of 4Q16 dispositions and $100 million 
of 2017 sales at a 7.8% blended cap rate, versus $480 million of acquisitions at a 5.5% cap rate.  This 
drives significant near‐term earnings dilution beyond what CXP has already experienced.  There is also 
execution/pricing risk for acquisitions on the way to a lower cap rate, higher value portfolio.  
 
Tenant Expirations and Street Expectations:  The high percent leased (90.7%) versus economic 
occupancy (84.2%) at the end of 3Q16 implies imbedded upside, but significant near‐term lease 
expirations temper our enthusiasm.  Roughly 21% of CXP’s total lease revenue is set to expire over the 
next two years, leading to some downtime and re‐leasing costs.  The Credit Suisse move‐out at 315 Park 
Avenue South in 2017 and the AMEC Foster Wheeler space at 1 Energy Center in 2018 are particularly 
sizable.  Occupancy will increase in the near‐term, driven by the 4Q16 NYU move‐in at 222 East 41st
 
Street (notwithstanding five quarters of free rent), but we expect occupancy to dip in 2018 on the 
large Houston rollover.  We suspect high Street FFO estimates may be missing this. 
 
Dividend Cut Appears Highly Likely: We estimate that CXP’s $1.20ps annualized dividend is not covered 
by FAD in 2016, even excluding the roughly $80 million of tenant improvements expected to be spent on 
NYU’s space in 4Q16 – and it will not be covered in 2017.  Therefore, we are modeling a 33% dividend 
cut in 2Q17 to an annualized rate of $0.80ps.  We project $0.87ps 2017E FAD and $1.10ps in 2018.  This 
should not be a surprise to investors, but a likely dividend cut on the horizon could keep many on the 
sidelines.  There is also a possibility of a deeper cut than we are assuming, depending on what the Board 
believes is a comfortable, sustainable level relative to projected FAD (and considering taxable income). 
 
Market/Property/Tenant Concentration Risk:  As of 3Q16, CXP owned 25 assets in 13 markets.  Six of 
those assets in five markets were targeted for sale (including Denver, Dallas and Phoenix which have 
already since sold in 4Q16).  Given the smaller number of markets that management considers core, we 
expect the number of markets to be trimmed to just five or six, increasing market concentration risk.  
The number of properties will go down before it goes back up, and the five largest already account for 
39% of CXP’s total lease revenue.  The five largest tenants account for 25% of total lease revenue, 
another concentration that could rise as assets are sold before others are purchased.  Some large 
tenants occupy full buildings, including Foster Wheeler, which appears likely to vacate the entire 
332,000 sf 1 Energy Center in Houston in 2018 (where rents could roll down when a replacement tenant 
is found).  We expect CXP to acquire large multi‐tenant properties, eventually mitigating this risk. 
 
Interest Rate Risk: Higher interest rates could lead to a cap rate expansion, which would be detrimental to 
NAV.  Rising rates could hurt disposition pricing and cost of capital, though acquisition cap rates could also be 
higher.  We think it is more likely that cap rates remain stickier/lower for CXP’s core markets relative to the 
ones it is exiting, perhaps making remaining portfolio recycling even more earnings dilutive.  A positive is 
that CXP appears well positioned from a balance sheet/leverage perspective.  Roughly $442 million (4.6% 
interest rate) of CXP’s $1.6 billion of total debt is secured, while the remaining ~$1.3 billion (4.1% rate) is 
fixed with a 6.9 year weighted average maturity.  This suggests a limited near‐term impact from rising rates.  
 
Track Record Yet to Be Built:  In its public market life, CXP has posted lower earnings every year and 
barely budged NAV.  So far, the company has been one in transition, losing shareholders money – and 
its non‐traded REIT background probably does not help attract institutional investors (though that 
should not matter now).  CXP will have an opportunity to begin building its track record as a high‐
quality, CBD, gateway market REIT soon, but reputations are earned over time.   
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 7 of 37
Portfolio Profile 
As of 9/30/16, CXP’s portfolio included 25 properties (including 1 hotel), totaling 11.2 million square 
feet across 13 markets in 12 states (including Washington DC).  The company’s top three market 
exposures (by 3Q16 cash NOI) are San Francisco, New York, and Atlanta, which together account for 
roughly 57% of the portfolio.  The top five markets (adding Houston and Cleveland) combined to 
account for 76% of 3Q16 cash NOI.  The overall leased percentage is 90.7% versus 86.7% commenced 
occupancy and 84.2% economic occupancy, with a weighted average in‐place net rent of $29 psf and 
lease term of 6.6 years. 
 
Figure 5: Number of Properties  Figure 6: Annual Lease Revenue per Square Foot ($) 
 
Note: Figure 5 and 6 include October sale of one property in Denver 
Source: Company documents; STRH 
 
 
Figure 7: Percentage Leased, Occupancy and Economic Occupancy 
Source: Company documents; STRH 
 
   
61 
43  43 
38  37  36 
39  39 
29  28  27  27 
24 
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
3Q13
4Q13
1Q14
2Q14
3Q14
4Q14
1Q15
2Q15
3Q15
4Q15
1Q16
2Q16
3Q16
28 
31  31  31  32 
38 
36  36 
39  39  40  40 
41 
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
3Q13
4Q13
1Q14
2Q14
3Q14
4Q14
1Q15
2Q15
3Q15
4Q15
1Q16
2Q16
3Q16
82%
84%
86%
88%
90%
92%
94%
96%
3Q13
4Q13
1Q14
2Q14
3Q14
4Q14
1Q15
2Q15
3Q15
4Q15
1Q16
2Q16
3Q16
Leased Occupied Economic Occupancy
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 8 of 37
Figure 8: 3Q16 Cash NOI by Market (%)  Figure 9: Gross Real‐Estate Assets by Market (%) 
 
Source: Company documents; SNL Financial; STRH
 
Approximately 71% of gross real estate assets are concentrated in central business districts with a 
smaller exposure to urban infill properties (15%) and suburban properties (14%), as illustrated in Figure 
10.  Approximately 69% of the properties are multi‐tenanted versus 31% that are single tenanted, as 
illustrated in Figure 11.  Management intends to increase the CBD focus and the exposure to multi‐
tenanted assets. 
 
Figure 10: Gross Real‐Estate Assets By Type (%)  Figure 11: GRA By Tenant Type (%) 
 
Source: Company documents; SNL Financial; STRH
 
CXP’s three largest tenants (Wells Fargo Bank, AT&T and Pershing) account for a combined 17% of 
annualized lease revenue, while the top five account for 25%.  As shown in Figure 12, the top 10 tenants 
account for 41% of the portfolio’s annualized lease income and encompass approximately 50% of 
leased square footage.  The top 20 tenants account for 56% of annualized lease revenues and 
encompass approximately 64% of leased square footage.  
   
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 9 of 37
Figure 12: Top 10 Tenants (by % of ALR) 
Source: Company documents; SNL Financial; STRH 
 
Management suggested it is narrowing its geographic focus on the three core, high‐barrier markets of 
New York, San Francisco and Washington DC, plus either Boston or Los Angeles (probably not both).  
San Francisco, New York and Washington DC currently account for 63% of total square footage and 50% 
of cash NOI.  Atlanta is the company’s third‐largest market, but management has suggested it will re‐
lease some upcoming rollover and ultimately trim its position there.  We expect CXP to maintain some 
exposure to its home market going forward, but not as a primary holding.  The company’s fourth‐largest 
market, Houston, is considered non‐core, although now may not be the most opportune time to sell. 
 
Over time, we believe the typical “high‐barrier” coastal markets tend to outperform national averages, 
supported by high investor demand, healthy job growth and relative supply constraints, all ultimately 
contributing to above‐average occupancy and rent growth.  That said, there is certainly no guarantee 
this will be the case over any given time period.  According to data from CBRE, over the past five years, 
the top four rent growth markets (out of 61 that the company tracks) were San Francisco, San Jose, 
Oakland and Boston.  Los Angeles ranked 14th
, New York 17th
 and Washington DC 54th
.  However, over 
the next five years, CBRE forecasts market rent growth in Los Angeles to rank 13th
, New York 43rd
, 
Washington DC 57th
, Boston 58th
 and San Francisco 60th
.  Among these five markets, only Washington 
DC ranks in the top 20 for forecasted occupancy change over the next five years (although occupancy 
levels are relatively high to begin with). 
 
Better fundamentals in some of the markets CXP is selling could help with dispositions, but we think it is 
worth noting that CXP has been charging hard toward a strategy that is in no way guaranteed to 
generate superior returns (and it is also notable that much of BXP’s valuation creation has come via 
ground‐up development). 
   
Tenant Credit Rating ALR ($000s) % of ALR
Leased sqft
(000s)
% of leased
sqft
1 Wells Fargo Bank N.A. AA- $28,630 7.0% 697 7.0%
2 AT&T Corporation/AT&T Services BBB+ $22,278 5.5% 955 9.7%
3 Pershing LLC A+ $18,537 4.6% 471 4.8%
4 Credit Suisse A $16,082 4.0% 209 2.1%
5 Westinghouse Electric Company Not Rated $15,778 3.9% 824 8.3%
6 NYU AA- $14,802 3.6% 390 3.9%
7 Yahoo! BB+ $14,676 3.6% 193 2.0%
8 Keybank National Association A- $13,939 3.4% 478 4.8%
9 Foster Wheeler BBB- $12,646 3.1% 332 3.4%
10 Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. BBB- $9,128 2.2% 411 4.2%
$166,496 40.9% 4,960 50.2%Total
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 10 of 37
Figure 13: Cumulative Office Job Growth since 4Q06 
Source: CBRE; STRH 
 
 
Figure 14: Office Occupancy for CXP’s Top Markets  Figure 15: Rental Rates for CXP’s Top Markets 
 
Source: CBRE; STRH 
 
 
 
 
   
‐20%
‐10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
4Q 2006
4Q 2007
4Q 2008
4Q 2009
4Q 2010
4Q 2011
4Q 2012
4Q 2013
4Q 2014
4Q 2015
4Q 2016
4Q 2017
4Q 2018
4Q 2019
4Q 2020
4Q 2021
San Francisco New York Washington, DC US
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
San Francisco NY Washington, DC US
$5
$15
$25
$35
$45
$55
$65
$75
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
San Francisco NY Washington, DC US
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 11 of 37
Internal Growth 
We estimate 89.1% commenced occupancy at the end of 2017, up from 86.7% at 3Q16, falling to 86.9% 
at the end of 2018, mostly because we assume AMEC Foster Wheeler will vacate 1 Energy Center.  We 
assume gradual lease‐up to 91.0% by YE2020.  We base our market rent growth assumptions largely on 
CBRE’s individual market projections, and are conservatively modeling slightly positive average rent 
spreads on new/renewal leases for 2017 and slightly negative spreads for 2018.  Management has 
suggested the rent mark‐to‐market across the entire portfolio is probably in the (positive) low double 
digits.  Taken together, we project roughly flat year‐over‐year SSNOI in 2017 and 2018. 
 
There appears to be increased optimism regarding potential tenant demand, particularly in New York 
and Washington DC, following the national election results.  We acknowledge that Trump administration 
goals such as lower corporate tax rates, reduced business regulation, greater defense spending, and 
perhaps simply more government action (an aligned president, house and senate could encourage more 
legislation, lobbying and legal activity) may not be reflected in our core growth forecasts.  That said, we 
also remind investors that there is still uncertainty regarding the administration’s policies and any 
changes will take time to implement and have an impact.  Further, CXP has nearly seven years of 
average in‐place lease term, so changes will take time to filter through portfolio performance.  For now, 
we believe we are taking a conservative approach to modeling core growth, as we are with all of the 
REITs we cover. 
 
Over the longer‐term, we expect TAMI (technology, advertising, media and information) and health care 
industries to help drive office demand in San Francisco, New York, and Boston (in particular Cambridge). 
Government and legal activity will drive Washington DC, while financial services remain important, 
particularly in New York. 
 
Figure 16: Lease Expiration Schedule by (% of Total Expiring sf and Total ALR) 
Source: Company documents; STRH 
 
 
 
9.7%
7.0%
2.5%
7.5%
16.3%
11.4%
9.2%
4.2%
8.1%
14.9%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
(% of sq expiring) (% of ALR expiring)
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 12 of 37
Leases representing approximately 21% of CXP’s total lease revenue (17% of leased square footage) 
are scheduled to expire in 2017‐2018 (see Figure 16).  CXP has averaged cash/GAAP re‐leasing rent 
spreads of 11%/42% over the past 12 months and much of the 2017 rollover is in New York and San 
Francisco, where rent spreads should be strong.  That said, we do expect a few notable move‐outs that 
will lead to downtime and capital expenditures. 
 
Notably, NYU (Langone Medical Center) signed a lease for 390,000 sf which commenced 11/1, bringing 
222 East 41st
 Street to 100% occupancy though the lease comes with five quarters of free rent.  NYU will 
occupy the previous Jones Day space, which agreed to an early termination agreement in 2Q16.  
Management suggested the net effective rent is similar to what Jones Day was paying.  We are modeling 
$80 million of related capital expenditures in 4Q16.  
 
Separately, management has already re‐leased some of the space Credit Suisse is leaving at 315 Park 
Avenue in April, leaving about 100,000 sf to backfill.  We are also modeling AMEC Foster Wheeler’s 
move‐out of the 332,000 sf 1 Energy Center in Houston in mid‐2018, which is large enough to have a 
meaningful negative impact on CXP’s total occupancy until that asset is addressed. 
 
Figure 17: Lease Expirations Through 2018 (as of 2Q16) 
Source: Company documents; STRH 
   
Market Tenant Property
San Francisco GoodbySilverstein & Partners Inc. 650 California 52
DLA Piper University Circle 119
Other 243
New York Credit Suisse 315 Park Avenue South 170
MongoDB 229 W. 43rd Street 50
Other 89
D.C. United Healthcare Services Market Square 40
BAE Systems 80 M Street 80
Other 57
Houston McKinsey & Company 5 Houston Center 35
AMEC Foster Wheeler 1 Energy Center 332
Other 125
Other Markets 80 $43psf -4%
Total 1,472
34%
15%
-9%
-4%
RSF
(000s)
Avg. In-place
rent per market
Avg. (gross)
mark-to-
$66psf
$71psf
$63psf
$40psf
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 13 of 37
External Growth 
CXP is nearing the end of an earnings‐dilutive, multi‐year strategy to sell suburban and other non‐core 
properties, and acquire assets to refocus on a core of New York, San Francisco, Washington DC and 
either Los Angeles or Boston (as well as some exposure to Atlanta).  A handful of non‐core properties 
remain to be sold, including three in Houston that could take a couple of years to sell at reasonable 
pricing.  Meanwhile, the acquisition market remains competitive, including in markets such as 
Washington DC where pricing is still ahead of fundamentals (notwithstanding management’s comments 
that leasing demand there has accelerated in the back half of this year).  CXP will be looking for multi‐
tenant properties with value‐add potential in the CBDs of its target markets.  Based on our 
conversations with management, we believe New York is high on the company’s list of the markets 
where it would like to grow (as an aside, management suggested at NAREIT earlier this year that 1440 
Broadway is the only NYRT property that CXP would potentially be interested in acquiring). 
 
Year‐to‐date through 12/15, CXP sold seven properties totaling $661 million.  It also has two Cleveland 
assets, with a combined $343 million gross asset value, under contract and expected to close in 4Q16 – 
and a Chicago property set to transfer back to the lender by year‐end.  This would complete the six 
“potential dispositions” listed in the company’s 3Q16 supplemental package (Denver, Chicago, Dallas, 
Phoenix and two in Cleveland).  The Houston and Pittsburgh assets could be sold at a later date, and 
management suggested it would continue to own either Boston or Los Angeles in the future, but 
probably not both (CXP owns one property in each of those markets). 
 
Targeted Acquisition Criteria:  Management noted three key characteristics for any potential 
acquisitions: 1) location – CXP will focus on amenity‐rich properties located in high‐barrier to entry CBD 
markets; 2) value add opportunity – either through a near‐term lease roll opportunity or a capital 
upgrade (315 Park Avenue is a good example); and 3) multi‐tenanted properties – CXP expressed a clear 
preference for multi‐tenanted properties versus single‐tenanted ones.  
 
Figure 18: CXP NOI Growth Profile 
Source: Company documents; STRH 
 
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 14 of 37
External Growth Assumptions.  For 4Q16, we are modeling the two Cleveland sales, the Dallas sale 
and the Phoenix sale, as well as the conveyance of the Chicago asset, totaling $472 million at a 7.8% 
cap rate.  This brings our total 2016 dispositions to $1.0 billion, at the high end of management’s $700 
million to $1 billion guidance range – though the timing is weighted very late in 4Q16.  We do not 
assume any acquisitions for 2016.   
 
For 2017, we assume $100 million of dispositions at a 7.4% average cap rate and $480 million of 
acquisitions at a 5.5% cap rate.  Management has not yet formally introduced 2017 guidance, but did 
note on its 3Q16 conference call that $500 million of acquisitions is a realistic near‐term goal.  We are 
modeling $200 million of dispositions in 2018 (6.6% cap rate) and $480 million of acquisitions (5.5% cap 
rate).  There are no ground‐up development projects included in our five‐year model. 
 
   
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 15 of 37
Earnings and NAV Estimates 
Funds From Operations:  Our 2016 FFO estimate is $1.51 per share, or $1.66ps on a normalized basis 
(excluding early debt retirement charges) – above management’s $1.47‐$1.49ps guidance (1.62‐
$1.64ps ex charges) and the $1.63ps consensus.  We think the main reason our estimate is higher is 
because of very late disposition timing during 4Q16. 
 
Conversely, our 2017 FFO estimate of $1.42ps is well below the $1.52ps consensus.  This difference 
could be due to acquisition/disposition assumptions or assumptions for the Credit Suisse roll at 315 Park 
Avenue (we assume downtime for the rest of the year). 
 
FFO has fallen every year since the stock listed, from $2.08ps in 2013 to $2.00ps in 2015 and only an 
estimated $1.51ps in 2016 and $1.42ps in 2017.  We expect growth to begin recovering in 2018, though 
our $1.51ps FFO estimate is also well below the $1.66ps consensus.  The pricing/timing of dispositions 
and capital redeployment are impactful variables and we wonder what others are assuming for the 
significant tenant expirations over the next two years.  At the very least, we think it’s prudent to assume 
that AMEC Foster Wheeler (332K) and McKinsey & Company (35K) will move out of their existing 
properties (1 Energy Center and 5 Houston Center, respectively) upon their 2018 expirations, which will 
weigh on internal growth. 
 
Figure 19: CXP normalized FFOps  
Source: Company documents; SNL Financial; STRH 
 
Our 2016 estimate implies a 16.5% YOY normalized FFO decrease, largely driven by $1 billion of 
dispositions, and our 2017 estimate implies a 14.4% YOY decline, bearing the full‐year impact of 2017 
dispositions only partially offset by lower cap rate acquisition activity and leasing activity.  We project 
5.4% average annual normalized FFOps growth from 2017‐2021, which ranks fourth out of the 14 
companies in our office coverage universe.  
 
 
 
$1.99
$1.66
$1.43 $1.51 $1.55
$1.69 $1.76 $1.82
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
$0.00
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
2015 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E
Normalized FFO per share FFO Growth (RHS: Y/Y % chg)
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 16 of 37
 
 
Figure 20: CXP FFOps Beats and Misses 
Source: Factset; STRH 
 
Funds Available for Distribution:  We estimate FAD of $0.55 per share in 2016 and $0.87 per share in 
2017, implying a 59% YOY decrease in 2016 followed by a 57% increase in 2017.  We expect 2016 to 
mark the trough in FAD, with CXP spending approximately $80 million in tenant improvements (for NYU 
Langone) in 4Q16.  That said, leasing costs (and free rent) could remain elevated with significant lease 
expirations in 2017‐2018, before falling off in 2019. 
 
Currently, our model implies 6.8% average annual FADps growth from 2017‐2022.  We still would not 
expect the current $1.20ps annual dividend to be covered by cash flow until 2022.  Therefore, we are 
assuming a 33% dividend cut in 2Q17 to $0.80ps annually, which would imply a roughly 76% average 
FAD payout ratio in the five years from 2018‐2022. 
 
   
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 17 of 37
Figure 21: CXP Income Statement ($ thousands) 
 
Source: Company documents; STRH 
 
 
Columbia Property Trust (CXP)
SunTrust Robinson Humprey
2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E
Revenues
Rental 436,048 99,586 93,567 87,561 86,844 367,558 353,244 351,530 348,807 361,079 366,302 371,434
Tenant reimbursements and other 99,655 19,753 18,709 17,090 16,902 72,454 68,192 67,775 67,024 69,056 70,055 71,037
Expansion portfolio 0 (2,132) (2,132) (34,026) (10,221) 12,190 29,424 40,437 47,510
Hotel Income 24,309 4,663 6,551 6,270 5,519 23,003 23,839 24,315 24,802 25,298 25,804 26,320
Other Income 1,816 1,009 919 827 800 3,555 3,325 3,392 3,460 3,530 3,601 3,674
Termination Income 4,237 1,568 8,185 1,518 1,000 12,271 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000
Total revenue 566,065 126,579 127,931 113,266 108,933 476,709 418,573 440,791 460,283 492,387 510,199 523,974
Property operating revenue 566,065 126,579 127,931 113,266 108,933 476,709 418,573 440,791 460,283 492,387 510,199 523,974
Expenses
Property operating 188,078 41,336 40,242 39,101 37,560 158,239 151,537 150,611 148,942 153,458 155,678 157,859
Hotel operating costs 19,615 4,331 5,038 4,946 4,622 18,937 19,555 20,014 20,458 20,855 21,272 21,698
Expansion portfolio 0 (746) (746) (11,909) (3,577) 4,266 10,298 14,153 16,628
General and administrative 29,683 10,490 7,761 7,467 8,224 33,942 31,890 33,054 34,038 35,804 36,719 37,324
Acquisition costs 3,675 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Depreciation and amortization 218,618 45,364 43,382 38,673 38,673 166,092 154,692 154,692 154,692 154,692 154,692 154,692
Depreciation and amortization - expansion portfolio 0 (8,277) (8,277) (17,523) (1,936) 9,066 16,034 21,902 24,102
Impairment of real estate assets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Asset and property management fees 1,816 330 341 387 380 1,438 1,530 1,545 1,560 1,576 1,592 1,608
Total expenses 461,485 101,851 96,764 90,574 80,436 369,625 329,771 354,402 373,022 392,718 406,008 413,912
Property operating expenses 209,509 45,997 45,621 44,434 41,816 177,868 160,712 168,592 175,227 186,188 192,695 197,793
Pro Rata NOI based on GAAP rents 83,669 84,548 71,151 68,808 308,176 255,761 278,714 299,708 327,397 342,840 354,285
Net Operating Income 356,556 80,582 82,310 68,832 67,117 298,841 257,861 272,199 285,056 306,199 317,503 326,180
Operating income 104,580 24,728 31,167 22,692 28,497 107,084 88,802 86,389 87,261 99,669 104,191 110,062
Other expenses, net
Interest expense (78,096) (16,097) (15,580) (15,338) (13,596) (60,611) (51,504) (55,039) (61,823) (64,106) (66,191) (67,085)
Interest income 54 5 8 39 25 77 100 100 100 100 100 100
Capital lease obligation interst expense (7,200) (1,800) (1,800) (1,800) (1,800) (7,200) (7,200) (7,200) (7,200) (7,200) (7,200) (7,200)
Development authority bond income 7,200 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200
Gain/Loss on early debt extinguishment (3,149) 0 (92) (18,905) 0 (18,997) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total other expense (income) (82,301) (16,092) (15,664) (34,204) (13,571) (79,531) (51,404) (54,939) (61,723) (64,006) (66,091) (66,985)
Loss on debt extinguishment / modification 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Income from continuing operations before income taxes 22,279 8,636 15,503 (11,512) 14,925 27,552 37,398 31,450 25,538 35,663 38,099 43,077
Benefit from income taxes (378) (77) (245) (65) (75) (462) (300) (300) (300) (300) (300) (300)
Income from continuing operations 21,901 8,559 15,258 (11,577) 14,850 27,090 37,098 31,150 25,238 35,363 37,799 42,777
Gain on sale of real estate property 23,860 (310) (19) 50,412 0 50,083 0 0 0 0 0 0
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations 23,860 (310) (19) 50,412 0 50,083 0 0 0 0 0 0
Net income (loss) 45,761 8,249 15,239 38,835 14,850 77,173 37,098 31,150 25,238 35,363 37,799 42,777
Less - Net gain/loss from unconsolidated JV (1,142) (1,552) (1,953) (1,937) (1,808) (7,250) (7,172) (6,890) (6,598) (6,084) (5,801) (5,509)
Net (loss) income attributable to equity holder 44,619 6,697 13,286 36,898 13,043 69,924 29,926 24,260 18,640 29,280 31,998 37,268
Less - Dividends on preferred shares 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Net income attributable to common shareholders 44,619 6,697 13,286 36,898 13,043 69,924 29,926 24,260 18,640 29,280 31,998 37,268
FFO
Depreciation of real estate assets 131,490 29,289 28,450 26,778 19,705 104,222 91,025 101,404 108,702 113,324 117,218 118,679
Amortization of lease-related costs 87,128 16,075 14,932 11,895 10,691 53,593 46,144 51,351 55,056 57,402 59,375 60,115
Unconsolidated joint ventures (Depreciation) 1,606 2,470 2,077 2,123 2,123 8,793 8,492 8,492 8,492 8,492 8,492 8,492
Loss on sale of real estate property (disc. Ops) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment of real estate assets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gain on sale of real estate property (23,860) 310 19 (50,412) 0 (50,083) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in the Operatin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diluted FFO 240,983 54,841 58,764 27,282 45,561 186,448 175,587 185,508 190,890 208,498 217,084 224,554
Loss on debt extinguishment 3,149 0 92 18,905 0 18,997 0 0 0 0 0 0
Deferred abatement and straight-line amortization 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acquisition costs 3,675 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Contingent consideration related to acquisition of property 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Development and redevelopment costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Settlement swap costs 1,102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelf registration costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
One-time legal costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Change in tax regulations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Core Funds From Operations 248,909 54,841 58,856 46,187 45,561 205,445 175,587 185,508 190,890 208,498 217,084 224,554
Topic D-42 Charges 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Early Retirement of Debt 3,149 0 92 18,905 0 18,997 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acquisition costs 3,675 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment Losses / Gains on Real Estate
Other non recurring/ M2M gains/losses 1,102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FFO - Normalized 248,909 54,841 58,856 46,187 45,561 205,445 175,587 185,508 190,890 208,498 217,084 224,554
Building capital (9,018) (718) (844) (429) (1,658) (3,649) (6,753) (7,222) (7,672) (8,254) (8,460) (8,590)
Other leasing costs (2,933) 271 (1,120) (1,217) (1,000) (3,066) (4,000) (4,000) (4,000) (4,000) (4,000) (4,000)
Adjusted Funds From Operations 89,529 46,466 41,023 30,289 (47,841) 69,937 89,657 130,365 148,210 147,066 127,133 175,864
0 0 0
Non-cash interest expense 2,349 1,012 915 837 825 3,589 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300
Straight-line rent, net (17,816) (5,872) (3,764) (5,525) (5,125) (20,286) (20,375) (19,000) (19,000) (19,000) (19,000) (19,000)
Net effect of above/below lease market amortization (9,199) (1,417) (1,709) (731) (800) (4,657) (3,200) (3,200) (3,200) (3,200) (3,200) (3,200)
Straight-line receivable write off in G&A 174 160 79 233 200 672 800 800 800 800 800 800
Debt fair value amortization 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Amortization of discounts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gain on interest rate swaps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tenant improvements (36,017) (2,798) (2,551) (7,810) (80,000) (93,159) (24,202) (13,282) (15,504) (34,004) (58,765) (32,009)
Leasing commissions (9,829) (426) (10,060) (2,181) (4,080) (16,747) (14,287) (7,239) (6,776) (14,806) (24,346) (13,126)
Building capital (9,018) (718) (844) (429) (1,658) (3,649) (6,753) (7,222) (7,672) (8,254) (8,460) (8,590)
Other leasing costs (2,933) 271 (1,120) (1,217) (1,000) (3,066) (4,000) (4,000) (4,000) (4,000) (4,000) (4,000)
Diluted FAD 166,620 45,053 39,802 29,364 (46,076) 68,143 106,870 135,666 138,838 129,334 103,413 148,728
FFO per Share - "NAREIT" $1.93 $0.44 $0.48 $0.22 $0.37 $1.51 $1.43 $1.51 $1.55 $1.69 $1.76 $1.82
Normalized FFO per share as reported by CXP $1.99 $0.44 $0.48 $0.37 $0.37 $1.66 $1.43 $1.51 $1.55 $1.69 $1.76 $1.82
Normalized FFO per share $1.99 $0.44 $0.48 $0.37 $0.37 $1.66 $1.43 $1.51 $1.55 $1.69 $1.76 $1.82
AFFO per share as calculated by CXP $0.72 $0.38 $0.33 $0.25 ($0.39) $0.57 $0.73 $1.06 $1.20 $1.19 $1.03 $1.43
Diluted FAD per share $1.33 $0.37 $0.32 $0.24 ($0.37) $0.55 $0.87 $1.10 $1.13 $1.05 $0.84 $1.21
DIV per Share $1.20 $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 $1.20 $0.90 $0.80 $0.80 $0.80 $0.80 $0.80
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 18 of 37
Net Asset Value: Our NAV estimate is $25.95 per share, based on a nominal cap rate of 5.9% (as of 
3Q16).  At the current stock price, CXP is trading at a 17% discount to NAV, versus a 11% average 
weighted discount for our office coverage universe.  The implied cap rate is 6.5% (as of 3Q16).  Notably, 
CXP has traded at a 15% average discount to the consensus NAV since the first analyst assumed 
coverage in early 2014, versus an 8% average discount for the SNL U.S. Office REIT index over the same 
period. 
 
CXP’s portfolio recycling effort has essentially involved a lot of selling at 8‐handle cap rates and buying 
at 4‐handle yields, which is very dilutive to earnings but theoretically neutral to NAV.  In fact, consensus 
NAV (currently $29.40ps, excluding our $25.95ps estimate) has stayed between $26.72ps and $29.87ps 
during the company’s public market history.  Consensus NAV has grown 3% since March 2014, versus 
25% for PDM and 23% for BXP over the same period – and while we cannot speak to the March 2014 
NAV estimate, we think today’s estimate appears high. 
 
We cannot be sure why the consensus NAV is so high relative to our estimate, but we wonder if some 
analysts may have missed the nearly $1ps of credit facility debt that was listed as $0 as of 10/3 in the 
3Q16 supplemental (it is also notable that the NYU tenant improvement package is nearly $1ps). 
 
 
   
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 19 of 37
 
Figure 22: CXP Net Asset Value ($ thousands) 
Source: Company documents; STRH 
   
Columbia Property Trust (CXP)
SunTrust Robinson Humprey
Net Asset Value
in $ thousands 3Q16
NAV per Share $25.95
Forward Twelve-Month NOI $277,855
Less: Straight-line rent (22,900)
Less: 10% of G&A (3,210)
Vacancy Value 15,344
Plus: Inter-Period Investment Activity
Forward Twelve-Month Cash NOI $267,089
Nominal Cap Rate 5.85%
Real Estate Value $4,565,631
Unconsolidated JV NOI $9,746
Nominal Cap Rate 4.00%
Unconsolidated Real Estate Value $243,652
Management & Other Fee Income $0
Cap Rate 10.00%
Value of Management Income $0
Book Value of Construction in Progress $28,888
Present Value of Development Value Creation 0
Book Value of Land Holdings 0
Value of Development Pipeline $28,888
Cash & Cash Equivalents $190,856
Accounts Receivable & Other $25,030
Other Tangible Assets $120,000
Other Assets/Liabilities
Non-Income Producing Assets
Vacancy Value normalization factor (87,430)
Accounts Payable (201,617)
Dividends Payable 0
Other Liabilities
Other Assets/Liabilities $46,839
Gross Asset Value $4,885,010
Senior Notes $689,357
Tem Loans $450,000
Line of Credit $99,000
Mortgage Notes Payable $275,992
Unconsolidated JV Debt 169,808
Mark-to-Market Debt Adjustment 3,063
Perpetual Preferred Stock 0
Long Term Debt/Preferred $1,687,220
Net Asset Value $3,197,790
Shares Outstanding 123,215
Units Outstanding
Options
Fully Diluted Shares & Units Outstanding 123,215
Net Asset Value / Share $25.95
Current Stock Price $21.43
Premium / Discount to NAV -17.4%
Implied Cap Rate 6.51%
Applied Value / Sq. Ft. $433
Implied Value / Sq. Ft. $380
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 20 of 37
Balance Sheet and Leverage 
We consider CXP’s balance sheet and leverage profile slightly better than average overall relative to our 
overall office coverage universe.  CXP is investment grade rated (BBB by S&P and Baa2 by Moody’s) 
and we estimate net debt/EBITDA as of 3Q16 was less than 6x (targeting about 6.5x), which compares 
favorably with an average in the high 6x range for our office coverage universe.  Approximately 81% of 
the company’s debt is fixed‐rate and 72% is unsecured.  The net debt/total market capitalization is 38% 
and we estimate net‐debt to gross asset value at 35%, which are slightly above‐ and below‐average, 
respectively, versus our office coverage universe. 
 
Figure 23: CXP Capital Structure ($ Billions)  Figure 24: Net Debt / Gross Asset Value   
 
Source: Company documents; SNL Financial; STRH
 
CXP’s debt maturities are well‐laddered as only ~9% of total debt comes due over the next two years 
and ~36% over the next four years.  As illustrated in Figure 25, the debt expiring over the next two 
years carries relatively higher interest rates, which could provide some favorable refinancing 
opportunities if market rates do not continue much higher.  Recall, CXP was able to issue $350 million 
of 10‐year unsecured notes at 3.65% in August (versus $350 million of 10‐year unsecured notes at 4.15% 
in April 2015).  We are modeling just $52 million of interest expense in 2017 versus $61 million in 2016, 
driven by a lower average balance and lower average interest rate. 
 
Notably, management has recently suggested that share repurchases are a possibility, although we are 
not currently modeling any.  Three factors are generally considered when assessing a potential buyback 
opportunity: 1) shares must trade at a significant discount to NAV, 2) financial leverage must be 
comfortable and 3) there would have to be no other more compelling uses of capital (acquisitions).  We 
believe the first two criteria for potential share repurchases are met, while the third is not clear. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
28%
29%
31% 31%
32%
35%
37% 38%
39%
41% 42%
46%
50%
52%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
DEA BXP HIW CUZ WRE CXP PDM VNO SLG OFC NYRT BDN CLI FPO
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 21 of 37
Figure 25: CXP Debt Maturity Schedule ($ millions)   
Source: Company documents; STRH 
 
   
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 22 of 37
Figure 26: CXP Balance Sheet ($ thousands)   
Source: Company documents; SNL Financial; STRH 
 
 
   
Columbia Property Trust (CXP)
SunTrust Robinson Humprey
2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E
BALANCE SHEET
ASSETS
Rental property, net 3,156,567 3,035,981 3,021,755 2,814,349 2,392,304 2,392,304 2,659,338 2,799,864 2,851,610 2,814,888 2,797,059 2,650,274
Land 896,467 864,495 844,495 787,456 787,456 787,456 787,456 787,456 787,456 787,456 787,456 787,456
Construction in progress 31,847 11,223 14,176 28,888 28,888 28,888 28,888 28,888 28,888 28,888 28,888 28,888
Other assets held-for-sale, net 0 0 10 32,306 32,306 32,306 32,306 32,306 32,306 32,306 32,306 32,306
Cash and cash equivalents 32,645 185,376 23,803 190,856 431,466 431,466 47,443 59,535 42,881 23,643 28,484 53,640
Tenant receivables, net 6,366 6,366 6,366 6,366 6,366 6,366 6,366 6,366 6,366
Prepaid expenses and other assets 47,518 47,510 46,440 24,885 24,885 24,885 24,885 24,885 24,885 24,885 24,885 24,885
Accrued straight-line rents 109,062 103,367 113,921 70,186 70,186 70,186 70,186 70,186 70,186 70,186 70,186 70,186
Notes receivable, net 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Investment in development bonds 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000
Investment in unconsolidated JV 118,695 121,784 123,919 125,605 125,605 125,605 125,605 125,605 125,605 125,605 125,605 125,605
Deferred financing costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Deferred costs, net 88,127 74,502 87,182 60,383 60,383 60,383 60,383 60,383 60,383 60,383 60,383 60,383
Intangible lease costs, net 77,190 70,560 65,775 58,645 58,645 58,645 58,645 58,645 58,645 58,645 58,645 58,645
Total assets 4,678,118 4,634,798 4,461,476 4,319,925 4,138,490 4,138,490 4,021,500 4,174,119 4,209,211 4,153,251 4,140,263 4,018,634
Liabilities
Mortgage Notes 438,063 464,722 277,365 275,992 226,992 226,992 226,992 226,992 300,072 300,072 300,072 300,072
Senior Notes 590,767 591,465 592,144 689,357 689,357 689,357 689,357 689,357 689,357 689,357 689,357 689,357
Other Debt - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Unsecured term loan 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000
Unsecured revolving credit facility 247,000 294,000 333,000 99,000 1 1 1 255,000 325,000 375,000 475,000 450,000
Liabilities held-for-sale - 0 132 15,644 15,644 15,644 15,644 15,644 15,644 15,644 15,644 15,644
Accounts payable and other liabilities 98,759 85,351 86,010 81,617 81,617 81617 81617 81617 81617 81617 81617 81617
Distributions payable and deferred income 37,354 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Obligations under capital leases 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000 120000
Deferred income 24,814 21,886 23,793 20,411 20,411 20,411 20,411 20,411 20,411 20,411 20,411 20,411
Intangible lease liabilities, net 57,167 53,154 49,396 36,239 36,239 36239 36239 36239 36239 36239 36239 36239
Total liabilities 2,063,924 2,080,578 1,931,840 1,788,260 1,640,262 1,640,262 1,640,262 1,895,261 2,038,341 2,088,341 2,188,341 2,163,341
Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Equity
Series A Preferred Shares 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common stock 1,243 1,234 1,234 1,234
Additional paid-in capital 4,588,303 4,563,537 4,564,729 4,565,651
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships 0
Accumulated other comprehensive loss -2,436 (7,293) (9,315) (8,065)
Dividends in excess of accumulated earnings -1,972,916 (2,003,258) (2,027,012) (2,027,155)
Total equity 2,614,194 2,554,220 2,529,636 2,531,665 2,498,228 2,498,228 2,381,238 2,278,858 2,170,870 2,064,910 1,951,922 1,855,293
Total liabilities, noncontrolling interests and equity 4,678,118 4,634,798 4,461,476 4,319,925 4,138,490 4,138,490 4,021,500 4,174,119 4,209,211 4,153,251 4,140,263 4,018,634
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 23 of 37
Dividend 
CXP’s next quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share will be paid on 1/5/17 to shareholders of record as of 
12/1/16.  The annualized payout of $1.20ps implies a yield of 5.6%, the highest in our 14‐company office 
coverage universe, but would be 38% above our 2017 FAD estimate.  Management has said that the 
Board will revisit the current dividend policy in 2017, with the view that a decision should be made with 
a long‐term objective in mind.  We think it is highly likely that the dividend will be cut in early 2017.  
We are modeling a 33% cut to an annualized rate of $0.80ps beginning in 2Q17 (reflected in Figure 28; 
implied 4.7% dividend yield), although even that could be high, as we estimate it implies an average FAD 
coverage ratio of 1.2x through 2021. 
 
Figure 27: Estimated CXP Dividend Yield vs. Office REITs 
Note: STRH estimated dividend yield shown  
Source: FactSet; Company documents; STRH;  
 
We do not model any dividend increases, after the assumed 2Q17 cut, in the remaining five years of our 
model.  Assuming the 2Q17 dividend cut in our model is accurate, CXP’s dividend yield would rank 12th 
highest out of the 14 companies in our office coverage universe, and has a four‐year (2017‐2021) FFO 
growth of 4th. 
   
2.1% 2.3% 2.4%
2.6%
3.3% 3.3% 3.5% 3.7% 3.8%
4.0% 4.1%
4.7% 4.9% 5.0%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
CLI
BXP
VNO
SLG
CUZ
Average
OFC
WRE
FPO
BDN
PDM
CXP
DEA
HIW
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 24 of 37
Figure 28: CXP Dividend per Share and FAD Dividend Coverage  
Note: This figure includes the assumption of a 33% dividend cut in 2Q17. 
Source: FactSet; Company documents; STRH 
 
 
   
‐150%
‐100%
‐50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
$0.00
$0.05
$0.10
$0.15
$0.20
$0.25
$0.30
$0.35
1Q14
3Q14
1Q15
3Q15
1Q16
3Q16
1Q17E
3Q17E
1Q18E
3Q18E
1Q19E
3Q19E
1Q20E
3Q20E
1Q21E
3Q21E
1Q22E
3Q22E
Dividend per Share (LHS) FAD Dividend Coverage (%; RHS)
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 25 of 37
Management Team 
CXP’s CEO, Chief Accounting Officer and SVP of Portfolio Management have been with the company 
since its days as a non‐traded Wells REIT, and the CFO joined shortly before the public listing.  The 
company hired the current western region (2014) and eastern region (2016) heads after going public.  
Management has led the company through a significant transformation that, with last week’s 
announcement that Dallas and Phoenix have been exited, is nearly complete.  Shifting from high‐yield, 
lower‐quality office properties in secondary markets and into low‐yield, high‐quality assets in gateway 
market CBDs has been earnings dilutive – but management is betting on better growth and stability 
going forward.  With earnings set to trough in 2017, we believe it is finally time for CXP to show 
investors that its strategy is the right one and that it can execute effectively. 
 
CXP has adopted what we consider shareholder‐friendly corporate governance.  The company is 
internally managed/advised, has no staggered board, has opted out of the Maryland Unsolicited 
Takeover Act (which permits boards to stagger its members without shareholder approval), and nine out 
of 10 of its Board members are independent directors.  CXP also has fully independent 
audit/compensation and corporate governance committees.  
 
E. Nelson Mills – Chief Executive Officer, President and Director  
E. Nelson Mills is the President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Columbia Property Trust.  Mr. 
Mills served as an Independent Director on the Columbia Property Trust Board since 2007 and was 
subsequently named President and Chief Executive Officer in 2010.  Prior to becoming CEO at CXP, he 
served for five years as the President and Chief Operating Officer of Williams Realty Advisors, LLC, where 
he was responsible for the firm's investment and financial strategy.  Previously, Mr. Mills served as Chief 
Financial Officer with Lend Lease Real Estate Investments (US), Inc., and prior to that he began his career 
in the financial industry as a partner with KPMG LLP.  He received a B.S. in Business Administration from 
the University of Tennessee, and an M.B.A. from the University of Georgia. 
 
James A. Fleming – Executive Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer 
James A. Fleming joined the company in 2013 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.  
Previously, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Schottenstein Property Group 
and prior to that, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cousins Properties 
Incorporated.  During his tenure with Cousins (2004 to 2010), he also held the roles of Senior Vice 
President, General Counsel, and Secretary.  Mr. Fleming serves on the Board of Directors of Carmike 
Cinemas, Inc.  He received a B.E.E. from Auburn University and a J.D. from the University of Virginia. 
 
David Dowdney – Senior Vice President (Western Region) 
David Dowdney joined Columbia Property Trust in 2014 as Senior Vice President – Western Region.  
Previously, Mr. Dowdney spent nearly eight years at GE Capital Real Estate, managing activities for the 
company’s west coast portfolio.  Prior to that, Mr. Dowdney spent 10 years in various real estate 
transaction roles for Divco West Properties and Jones Lang La Salle.  He is an active member of both the 
Urban Land Institute (ULI) and the Commercial Real Estate Development Association (NAIOP), and serves 
on the board of the Northern California Real Estate Council for the City of Hope.  He received a B.A. in 
Geography from the University of California, Los Angeles, and an M.B.A. from the University of 
California. 
 
   
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 26 of 37
Wendy Gill – Senior Vice President (Corporate Operations) and Chief Accounting Officer 
Wendy Gill has been the company’s Chief Accounting Officer since 2007 and served as interim Principal 
Financial Officer in early 2013.   She served as Director of Financial Reporting for Wells Real Estate Funds 
for five years, and previously worked for Arthur Andersen, primarily in the real estate and financial 
services industries.  Ms. Gill received a B.S. in Accounting from the University of Delaware and holds a 
Certified Public Accountant designation from the Maryland State Board of Public Accountancy.    
 
Kevin Hoover – Senior Vice President (Portfolio Management) 
Kevin Hoover is Senior Vice President – Portfolio Management and has worked in various capacities at 
Columbia since 2004.  He previously served as the co‐head of Asset Management for Wells Real Estate 
Funds and as Portfolio Manager for several of its sponsored real estate products.  Prior to that, he 
served as a Principal for Lend Lease Real Estate Investments and as a Manager for Price Waterhouse in 
the Real Estate Valuations Practice.  Mr. Hoover received a B.B.A. in Real Estate from the University of 
Georgia and is a member of the Urban Land Institute, the National Association of Office and Industrial 
Properties, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Managers, the Appraisal Institute, and 
the Certified Commercial Investment Member Institute. 
 
Adam I. Popper – Senior Vice President (Eastern Region) 
Adam I. Popper joined the company in 2016 as Senior Vice President – Eastern Region.  Mr. Popper 
primarily focuses on assets and opportunities in the key markets of New York City, Washington, and 
Boston and serves on Columbia’s Investment Committee.  Previously, he was a managing principal and 
member of the investment committee at Westbrook Partners. Prior to that, Mr. Popper served as a 
senior vice president and director of acquisitions for Vornado Realty Trust. Prior to that, Mr. Popper 
served as a managing director of Beacon Capital Partners, and as a senior director of Tishman Speyer 
Properties where he oversaw the Company’s acquisition efforts.  He received a Bachelor's degree in 
Political Science from Hamilton College and is a member of Urban Land Institute and the International 
Council of Shopping Centers. 
 
In addition to the corporate officers named above, CXP has 11 directors, eight vice presidents and one 
senior analyst across its various finance, operations and other corporate departments. 
 
Figure 29: Columbia’s Board of Directors 
Source: Company documents; SNL Financial; STRH 
 
 
 
 
Name Position Age Director Since Independent
E. Nelson Mills President, Chief Executive Officer and Director 55 2007 ‐
John L. Dixon Chairman of the Board and Director 73 2012 Yes
Carmen M. Bowser Director 61 2016 Yes
Charles R. Brown Director 77 2003 Yes
Richard W. Carpenter Director 79 2003 Yes
David B. Henry Director 67 2016 Yes
Murray J. McCabe Director 48 2013 Yes
Michael S. Robb Director 68 2015 Yes
George W. Sands Director 70 2010 Yes
Thomas G. Wattles Director 64 2013 Yes
Average Age  66
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 27 of 37
Management Compensation 
CXP’s compensation committee, consisting of Mr. McCabe (Chairman), Mr. Carpenter, Mr. Dixon and 
Mr. Robb, held seven meetings in 2015.  The committee strives for a balanced compensation mix, 
performance‐based short‐term cash incentive awards, largely performance‐based equity awards, 
aligning the long‐term focus with shareholder interests, a claw‐back provision (three years), stock 
ownership guidelines, annual say on pay vote (96% approval on last vote), award caps, prohibition of 
hedges and pledging of company stock, no perquisites, independent compensation consultant, 
compensation risk analysis, no tax gross‐ups and double trigger change in control severance. 
 
Figure 30: Columbia’s 2015 Named Executive Compensation 
Note 1: Includes matching 401K plans and life insurance 
Note 2: SVP – Eastern Region, Adam Popper, joined CXP in 2016 and therefore is not listed above. 
Source: Company documents, STRH, SNL Financial, as of 2015 Proxy 
 
The CEO consults with the compensation committee regarding pay for each of the named executive 
officers, other than himself.  The committee considers this input, along with that provided by its 
advisors, but maintains full discretion to set all executive officer compensation.  No specific targets 
relative to the company’s peer group (provided by an independent compensation consultant; see Figure 
31) are considered, except that the committee ensures overall compensation does not exceed the 
median of this group, unless CXP produces “strong performance.” 
 
Figure 31: Columbia’s Selected Peer Group 
Source: Company documents, STRH, as of 2015 Proxy 
 
There are three primary factors in determining short term incentive compensation: 1) corporate 
performance metrics; 2) business performance metrics; (applicable to only Mrs. Gill and Mr. Hoover) 
and 3) individual performance metrics.  A brief overview of the corporate performance metrics are 
provided in Figure 32. 
 
Figure 32: Columbia’s 2015 Corporate Performance Metrics 
Note 1: NAREIT FFO definition 
Source: Company documents, STRH, SNL Financial, as of 2015 Proxy 
Name Salary Bonus
Stock Awards
(LTIP)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Other
1
Total
E. Nelson Mills $750,000 $0 $2,025,000 $922,500 $24,288 $3,721,788
James A. Fleming $460,000 $0 $712,500 $509,220 $1,205 $1,682,925
Wendy W. Gill $325,000 $0 $225,000 $261,092 $18,288 $829,380
Kevin A. Hoover $375,000 $0 $250,000 $362,846 $24,288 $1,012,134
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. Highwoods Properties, Inc.
Brandywine Realty Trust Kilroy Realty Corporation
Corporate Office Properties Trust Liberty Property Trust
Cousins Properties Incorporated Mack-Cali Realty Corporation
Douglas Emmett, Inc. Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Duke Realty Corporation Washington Real Estate Investment Trust
Metric Weight Threshold Target Maximum Actual
Normalized FFO per share(1) 30% $1.85 $1.91 $1.97 $1.99
Accomplish Primary Business
Plan Objectives
30% Subjective Subjective Subjective Subjective
Same Store NOI Cash 25% $310.5M $320.1M $329.7M $320.5.5M
Portfolio G&A Expense 15% $33M $32M $31.0M $29.7M
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 28 of 37
In comparison, the business unit performance metrics are largely based on subjective qualitative 
criteria.  However, Mr. Hoover was measured against a mix of qualitative and quantitative criteria: 1) 
dispositions closed (35%); 2) Asset acquisitions (30%); 3) accomplishing real estate business plan 
objectives (25%); and 4) transaction timing and costs (5%).  The individual performance metrics are 
subjective in nature.  
 
The compensation committee determines long‐term incentive plan (LTIP) awards based on 
performance measures, as well as a fixed “service” component.  Within the performance component, 
the executives are measured against two relative total shareholder return (TSR) metrics: 1) relative TSR 
compared to a custom peer group used for benchmark purposes (30% weight); and 2) relative TSR as 
compared to the MSCI US REIT Index comprised of ~140 equity REITs (30%).  The remaining 40% of this 
component is evaluated on a subjective basis.  Each named executive’s LTIP award will be determined 
along the weightings in Figure 33. 
 
Figure 33: Columbia’s 2015 LTIP Allocation Composition 
 
Note 1: NAREIT FFO definition 
Source: Company documents, STRH, SNL Financial, as of 2015 Proxy 
 
Change in control compensation is triggered if an executive is terminated within 12 months of a 
change in control.  The payment is a multiple (3x for Mr. Mills and 2x for Mr. Fleming) times the sum of 
the executive’s base salary and the average of the actual annual cash incentive compensation received 
during the prior three years. 
 
Insider Ownership 
As shown in Figure 34, Mr. Mills is the largest direct insider with ~187,000 shares (0.15% of the 
outstanding shares), worth nearly $4.0 million.  Mr. Fleming has an ownership stake totaling ~$1.5 
million.  Mr. Hoover, Mr. Dixon and Mrs. Gill each have ownership positions each valued around $0.5 
million.  Non‐employee directors are required to own stock worth at least three times the annual cash 
retainer (currently a position totaling ~$195,000). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
performance
component
service
component
E. Nelson Mills 75% 25% 175%
James A. Fleming 75% 25% 175%
Wendy W. Gill 50% 50% 150%
Kevin A. Hoover 50% 50% 150%
% of LTIP allocated to
Name
Maximum LTIP as % of
Target
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 29 of 37
Figure 34: Columbia Direct Insider Ownership  
Source: STRH, Bloomberg, Share positions as of 12/20/2016, Market value as of 12/20/2016 
 
 
 
   
Name Position Market Value ($) Shares Out (%)
Mills, E Nelson 186,888 $4,005,010 0.15%
Fleming, James A 68,609 $1,470,291 0.06%
Hoover, Kevin A 26,272 $563,009 0.02%
Dixon, John L 24,892 $533,436 0.02%
Gill, Wendy W 23,499 $503,584 0.02%
Carpenter, Richard W 12,813 $274,583 0.01%
McCabe, Murray Jerome 12,271 $262,968 0.01%
Wattles, Thomas G 11,981 $256,753 0.01%
Brown, Charles R 8,839 $189,420 0.01%
Sands George W  8,563 $183,505 0.01%
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 30 of 37
Valuation 
CXP trades at 15.0x normalized 2017E FFO, which is a 4% discount to our office coverage universe simple 
average of 15.7x.  It trades at 24.7x 2017E FAD, a 4% premium to the 23.7x average for the group.  We 
think these multiples seem fair on a relative basis, given the roughly average projected growth and 
financial leverage.  The stock trades at a 17% discount to our $25.95ps NAV estimate, versus a 5% 
average discount for our office coverage universe.  The stock has traded at a 15% average discount to 
NAV during its public market history, versus an 8% average discount for the SNL US Office REIT Index 
over the same period. 
 
Figure 35: Historical P/FFO Multiples  Figure 36: Historical P/NAV  
Source: Factset; SNL Financial; STRH; Consensus FFO/NAV estimates shown
 
 
Figure 37: Price/2017E Norm. FFO Comparison  Figure 38: Price/2017E FAD Comparison 
Source: Factset; SNL Financial; STRH 
 
   
12
13
14
15
4Q13
2Q14
4Q14
2Q15
4Q15
2Q16
Current
CXP P/FFO CXP Average
-30%
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
Mar-15 Jun-15 Sep-15 Dec-15 Mar-16 Jun-16 Sep-16 Dec-16
CXP P/NAV Average
11.4
12.3 12.3 12.7
14.9 14.9 14.9 15.0 15.4
16.9
17.9
19.6
20.3
21.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
BDN
FPO
PDM
CLI
CUZ
OFC
HIW
CXP
DEA
SLG
WRE
VNO
NYRT
BXP
14.5
15.9 16.3
17.7 17.9
21.0 21.2
23.4
24.7
27.3 28.2
29.5
35.1
38.9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
PDM
FPO
BDN
OFC
DEA
WRE
HIW
CUZ
CXP
NYRT
SLG
BXP
VNO
CLI
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 31 of 37
Figure 39: NAV Premium/(Discount) Comparison1
  Figure 40: Implied Cap Rate Comparison 
Note 1: NAV as of 3Q/16; CUZ cap rate reflects 3Q/17E 
Source: Factset; SNL Financial; STRH 
 
We expect CXP’s 2017‐2021 annual FFOps growth to rank 4th out of the 14 office REITs we cover, while 
its P/2017E FFO multiple is the 8th lowest.  In comparison, we expect CXP’s FAD growth to be ‐0.8% 
from 2017‐2021, which ranks last in our coverage universe and has the 9th lowest FAD multiple. Having 
said that, we consider Columbia to be fairly valued, given its growth prospects coupled with its above 
average financial leverage.  An improved growth outlook or relative dip in the stock price could lead us 
to become more positive on the shares. 
 
Figure 41: P/2017 FFO vs ’17‐’21 FFO Growth   
 
Source: Factset; SNL Financial; STRH 
 
   
‐22%
‐17%
‐15%
‐13%
‐11% ‐10%
‐9%
‐3% ‐3%
1% 2%
4%
6%
18%
‐25%
‐20%
‐15%
‐10%
‐5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20% SLG
CXP
VNO
FPO
BXP
PDM
NYRT
BDN
CLI
WRE
OFC
CUZ
HIW
DEA
5x
7x
9x
11x
13x
15x
17x
19x
21x
23x
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9%
Price / 2017 Norm. FFO
Annual Normalized FFO Growth '17‐'21
BXPNYRT
VNO
SLG
WRE
CUZ
HIW OFC
BDNPDM FPO
CLI
DEA
CXP
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 32 of 37
Figure 42: Office Comp Sheet1
 
Note 
1
: CUZ NAV and cap rates are as of 3Q17, reflects Houston spin‐off;  
Source: SNL Financial; Factset; STRH 
 
 
 
 
 
   
U.S. REITs Comp Sheet
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey
Equity Prem./ Applied Implied Net debt
Stock Target Market NAV Disc. Cap Cap Div. + Pref /
Ticker Rating Price Price Cap 2016E 2017E 2016E 2017E 2016E NAV Rate Rate Yield GAV
($ Bn) (x) (x) (x) (x) ($) (%) (%) (%) (%) (x)
BDN Buy $16.18 $18.00 $2.9 12.6x 11.4x 18.2x 16.3x $16.69 (3.1%) 6.65% 6.78% 4.0% 46.1%
BXP Hold $127.29 $130.00 $19.6 21.3x 21.0x 35.2x 29.5x $143.59 (11.4%) 4.75% 5.19% 2.0% 29.4%
CLI Hold $28.71 $29.00 $2.9 13.4x 12.7x 25.2x 38.9x $29.48 (2.6%) 7.30% 7.42% 2.1% 49.5%
CUZ Buy $8.42 $9.00 $1.8 10.8x 14.9x 46.7x 23.4x $12.08 (30.3%) 6.25% 6.44% 3.8% 30.7%
CXP Hold $21.43 $21.00 $2.6 12.9x 15.0x 38.8x 24.7x $25.95 (17.4%) 6.25% 6.44% 5.6% 34.5%
DEA Buy $19.76 $21.00 $0.9 16.0x 15.4x 20.5x 19.0x $16.76 17.9% 6.80% 6.01% 4.9% 27.9%
FPO Buy $10.59 $11.00 $0.6 10.0x 12.3x 12.0x 15.9x $12.11 (12.6%) 6.95% 7.40% 3.8% 51.7%
HIW Hold $50.30 $50.00 $5.2 15.6x 14.9x 24.9x 21.2x $47.29 6.4% 6.25% 5.97% 3.4% 30.5%
NYRT Hold $10.54 $10.00 $1.8 26.5x 24.4x 36.7x 35.1x $10.47 0.7% 4.57% 4.55% 3.6% 42.0%
OFC Buy $31.34 $31.00 $3.1 15.5x 15.0x 19.1x 18.0x $30.23 3.7% 7.00% 6.85% 3.5% 41.5%
PDM Hold $20.49 $21.00 $3.0 12.4x 12.3x 15.5x 14.5x $22.83 (10.2%) 5.95% 6.36% 4.1% 37.4%
SLG Buy $110.30 $123.00 $11.6 16.2x 16.9x 19.7x 28.2x $140.80 (21.7%) 4.40% 5.21% 2.8% 39.3%
VNO Hold $104.69 $107.00 $21.1 21.5x 19.6x 47.9x 35.1x $123.04 (14.9%) 4.50% 5.07% 2.4% 38.2%
WRE Hold $32.51 $32.00 $2.4 18.2x 17.9x 22.5x 21.0x $32.12 1.2% 6.00% 5.95% 3.7% 32.1%
P/FFO
Multiple
P/FAD
Multiple
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 33 of 37
Investment Recommendation and Price Target 
We are initiating coverage of Columbia Property Trust with a Hold rating and a $21 price target, which 
implies a 2.7% potential total return including a 4.7% projected dividend yield (versus an average of 
6.7% for our office coverage universe).  Our target is based on an $18.61 discounted cash flow value 
(50% weighting) and 15% assumed discount to our projected NAV a year from now (50%).  Our target 
also implies 13.9x 2018E FFO and 19.1x 2018E FAD; the stock currently trades at 15.0x 2017E FFO and 
24.7x 2017E FAD. 
 
Figure 43: Price Target Calculation  
 
Source: SNL Financial, Factset; STRH 
 
Figure 44: Office Price Target Comparison   
Source: SNL Financial; Factset, STRH 
 
Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5
FAD $0.24 $1.06 $1.13 $1.05 $0.92
Term Value (FAD) $18.77
Sub-total $0.24 $1.06 $1.13 $1.05 $19.69
NPV $17.36
Forward Equity Price $18.61 DCF Assumptions
Cost of Equity 7.2%
Net Asset Value $25.95 Year 5 Growth 7.4%
3Q17E Net Asset Value $26.34 Term. Growth Rate 1.9%
15% Discount to 3Q17E NAV $22.39
Forward Dividend Yield 4.7%
Target Price $21.00 Total Return 2.7%
Price Prem/Disc 5‐Yr. Avg. 3Q17E Prem/Disc Adj. Fwd. Price Implied Dividend Implied
Ticker Rating 12/20/2016 NAV to NAV Prem/Disc NAV Applied NAV DCF Target Appreciation Yield Tot. Return
BDN Buy $16.18 $16.69 ‐3% ‐8% 16.92     ‐3% $16.49 $18.51 $18 11.2% 4.0% 15.3%
SLG Buy $110.30 $140.80 ‐22% ‐7% 148.09   ‐13% $129.58 $116.86 $123 11.5% 2.6% 14.1%
DEA Buy $19.76 $16.76 18% ‐1% 17.12     7% $18.41 $23.31 $21 6.3% 4.9% 11.1%
CUZ Buy $8.42 $8.09 4% ‐7% 8.09        0% $8.09 $9.07 $9 6.9% 3.3% 10.2%
FPO Buy $10.59 $12.11 ‐13% ‐19% 12.51     ‐15% $10.63 $11.98 $11 3.9% 3.8% 7.6%
PDM Hold $20.49 $22.83 ‐10% ‐6% 22.08     ‐7% $20.43 $22.35 $21 2.5% 4.1% 6.6%
OFC Buy $31.34 $30.66 2% ‐13% 31.34     ‐3% $30.56 $32.49 $32 2.1% 3.5% 5.6%
VNO Hold $104.69 $123.04 ‐15% ‐5% 131.51   ‐10% $118.36 $94.64 $107 2.2% 2.4% 4.6%
BXP Hold $127.29 $143.59 ‐11% ‐4% 144.91   ‐5% $137.66 $122.48 $130 2.1% 2.3% 4.4%
HIW Hold $50.30 $47.29 6% ‐1% 47.41     5% $49.78 $49.68 $50 ‐0.6% 5.0% 4.4%
CLI Hold $28.71 $29.48 ‐3% ‐13% 29.77     ‐10% $26.79 $31.49 $29 1.0% 2.1% 3.1%
CXP Hold $21.43 $25.95 ‐17% ‐15% 26.34     ‐15% $22.39 $18.61 $21 ‐2.0% 4.7% 2.7%
WRE Hold $32.51 $32.12 1% ‐12% 32.94     ‐3% $32.11 $30.89 $32 ‐1.6% 3.7% 2.1%
NYRT Hold $9.90 $10.83 ‐9% ‐8% 11.33     ‐8% $10.48 $9.48 $10 1.0% 0.4% 1.4%
Simple Average ‐5% ‐8% ‐6% 3.3% 3.3% 6.7%
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 34 of 37
Company Description
Columbia Property Trust is a publicly-traded (NYSE: CXP), fully-integrated and self-managed office
REIT, headquartered in Atlanta, GA. The company was originally founded in 2004 as “Wells REIT
II,” a public, non-traded REIT which built a portfolio of high-yield office properties to support its large
dividend payout. CXP aims to own and operate primarily class-A office properties in central business
district (CBD) locations within gateway coastal markets, such as New York, Washington DC, and San
Francisco.
Investment Thesis
We are initiating with a Hold rating because 1) there is uncertainty regarding the pricing/timing of
dispositions and capital reinvestment, 2) we think Street NAV and 2017/18 FFO estimates appear
optimistic, particularly in light of a few large likely tenant move-outs (21% of lease revenue expiring in
2017-2018), 3) the dividend is likely to be cut significantly in early 2017, in our view, and 4) we think
investors will require some proof of execution/growth before the discount to NAV closes relative to
many established peers also trading at discounts.
Valuation and Risks
CXP based on: $18.61 DCF (50% weighting) and 15% assumed discount to our projected NAV a year
from now (50%). Price Target: $21. Risks to our thesis that could cause the stock to outperform or
underperform include: 1) disposition timing/pricing, 2) attractiveness of capital redeployment options,
3) tenant retention/re-leasing activity, 4) magnitude of a potential dividend cut and 5) fundamental
performance of CXP's largest markets. The analyst has elected to benchmark the performance for the
ratings of the stock that is the subject of this report to the RMZ.
Companies Mentioned in This Note
Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN, $16.18, Buy, Michael Lewis)
Boston Properties, Inc. (BXP, $127.29, Hold, Michael Lewis)
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (CLI, $28.71, Hold, Michael Lewis)
Cousins Properties Incorporation (CUZ, $8.42, Buy, Michael Lewis)
Columbia Property Trust, Inc. (CXP, $21.43, Hold, Michael Lewis)
Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA, $19.76, Buy, Michael Lewis)
First Potomac Realty Trust (FPO, $10.59, Buy, Michael Lewis)
Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW, $50.30, Hold, Michael Lewis)
New York REIT, Inc. (NYRT, $9.90, Hold, Michael Lewis)
Corporate Office Properties Trust (OFC, $31.34, Buy, Michael Lewis)
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM, $20.49, Hold, Michael Lewis)
SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG, $110.30, Buy, Michael Lewis)
Vornado Realty Trust (VNO, $104.69, Hold, Michael Lewis)
Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (WRE, $32.51, Hold, Michael Lewis)
Analyst Certification
I, Michael Lewis , hereby certify that the views expressed in this research report accurately reflect my
personal views about the subject company(ies) and its (their) securities. I also certify that I have not been,
am not, and will not be receiving direct or indirect compensation in exchange for expressing the specific
recommendation(s) in this report.
Required Disclosures
Analyst compensation is based upon stock price performance, quality of analysis, communication skills,
and the overall revenue and profitability of the firm, including investment banking revenue.
As a matter of policy and practice, the firm prohibits the offering of favorable research, a specific
research rating or a specific target price as consideration or inducement for the receipt of business or
compensation. In addition, associated persons preparing research reports are prohibited from owning
securities in the subject companies.
Charts indicating changes in ratings can be found in recent notes and/or reports at our website or by
contacting SunTrust Robinson Humphrey. Please see our disclosures page for more complete information
at https://suntrust.bluematrix.com/sellside/Disclosures.action.
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 35 of 37
STRH Ratings System for Equity Securities
Dissemination of Research
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey (STRH) seeks to make all reasonable efforts to provide research reports
simultaneously to all eligible clients. Reports are available as published in the restricted access area of
our website to all eligible clients who have requested a password. Institutional investors, corporates, and
members of the Press may also receive our research via third party vendors including: Thomson Reuters,
Bloomberg, FactSet, and S&P Capital IQ. Additional distribution may be done by sales personnel via
email, fax, or other electronic means, or regular mail.
For access to third party vendors or our Research website:
https://suntrustlibrary.bluematrix.com/client/library.jsp
please email the Research Department at STRHEquityResearchDepartment@SunTrust.com
or contact your STRH sales representative.
The rating system effective as of Oct. 7, 2016:
STRH Rating System for Equity Securities
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey (STRH) rates individual equities using a three-tiered system. Each stock
is rated relative to the broader market (generally the S&P 500) over the next 12-18 months (unless
otherwise indicated).
Buy (B) – the stock’s total return is expected to outperform the S&P 500 or relevant benchmark over the
next 12-18 months (unless otherwise indicated)
Hold (H) – the stock’s total return is expected to perform in line with the S&P 500 or relevant benchmark
over the next 12-18 months (unless otherwise indicated)
Sell (S) – the stock’s total return is expected to underperform the S&P 500 or relevant benchmark over
the next 12-18 months (unless otherwise indicated)
Not Rated (NR) – STRH does not have an investment rating or opinion on the stock
Coverage Suspended (CS) – indicates that STRH’s rating and/or target price have been temporarily
suspended due to applicable regulations and/or STRH Management discretion. The previously published
rating and target price should not be relied upon
STRH analysts have a price target on the stocks that they cover, unless otherwise indicated. The price
target represents that analyst's expectation of where the stock will trade in the next 12-18 months (unless
otherwise indicated). If an analyst believes that there are insufficient valuation drivers and/or investment
catalysts to derive a positive or negative investment view, they may elect with the approval of STRH
Research Management not to assign a target price; likewise certain stocks that trade under $5 may
exhibit volatility whereby assigning a price target would be unhelpful to making an investment decision.
As such, with Research Management‘s approval, an analyst may refrain from assigning a target to a sub-
$5 stock.
Legend for Rating and Price Target History Charts:
B = Buy
H = Hold
S = Sell
D = drop coverage
CS = Coverage Suspended
I = initiate coverage
T = transfer coverage
The prior rating system until Oct. 7, 2016:
3 designations based on total returns* within a 12-month period**
∙ Buy – total return ≥ 15% (10% for low-Beta securities)***
∙ Reduce – total return ≤ negative 10% (5% for low Beta securities)
∙ Neutral – total return is within the bounds above
∙ NR – NOT RATED, STRH does not provide equity research coverage
∙ CS – Coverage Suspended
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 36 of 37
*Total return (price appreciation + dividends); **Price targets are within a 12-month period, unless
otherwise noted; ***Low Beta defined as securities with an average Beta of 0.8 or less, using Bloomberg’s
5-year average
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey ratings distribution (as of 12/21/2016):
Coverage Universe Investment Banking Clients Past 12 Months
Rating Count Percent Rating Count Percent
Buy 373 58.01% Buy 91 24.40%
Hold/Neutral 268 41.68% Hold/Neutral 48 17.91%
Sell/Reduce 2 0.31% Sell/Reduce 0 0.00%
Other Disclosures
Information contained herein has been derived from sources believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed
as to accuracy and does not purport to be a complete analysis of the security, company or industry
involved. This report is not to be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any
security. SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. and/or its officers or employees may have positions in
any securities, options, rights or warrants. The firm and/or associated persons may sell to or buy from
customers on a principal basis. Investors may be prohibited in certain states from purchasing some over-
the-counter securities mentioned herein. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. The
information herein is for persons residing in the United States only and is not intended for any person in
any other jurisdiction.
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc.’s research is provided to and intended for use by Institutional
Accounts as defined in FINRA Rule 4512(c). The term “Institutional Account" shall mean the account of:
(1) a bank, savings and loan association, insurance company or registered investment company; (2) an
investment adviser registered either with the SEC under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act or
with a state securities commission (or any agency or office performing like functions); or (3) any other
person (whether a natural person, corporation, partnership, trust or otherwise) with total assets of at least
$50 million.
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. is a registered broker-dealer and a member of FINRA and SIPC. It is
a service mark of SunTrust Banks, Inc. SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. is owned by SunTrust Banks,
Inc. ("SunTrust") and affiliated with SunTrust Investment Services, Inc. Despite this affiliation, securities
recommended, offered, sold by, or held at SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. and at SunTrust Investment
Services, Inc. (i) are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; (ii) are not deposits or
other obligations of any insured depository institution (including SunTrust Bank); and (iii) are subject to
investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. SunTrust Bank may have a
lending relationship with companies mentioned herein.
Please see our Disclosure Database to search by ticker or company name for the current required
disclosures, including risks to the price targets, Link: https://suntrust.bluematrix.com/sellside/
Disclosures.action
Please visit the STRH equity research library for current reports and the analyst roster with contact
information, Link (password protected): STRH RESEARCH LIBRARY
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., member FINRA and SIPC. SunTrust and SunTrust Robinson
Humphrey are service marks of SunTrust Banks, Inc.
If you no longer wish to receive this type of communication, please request removal by sending an email
to STRHEquityResearchDepartment@SunTrust.com
© SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. 2016 . All rights reserved. Reproduction or quotation in whole or
part without permission is forbidden.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE at our website, www.suntrustrh.com, or by writing to:
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Research Department, 3333 Peachtree Road N.E., Atlanta, GA
30326-1070
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Page 37 of 37

More Related Content

What's hot

Legacy Reserves October 2013 Investor Presentation
Legacy Reserves October 2013 Investor PresentationLegacy Reserves October 2013 Investor Presentation
Legacy Reserves October 2013 Investor PresentationCompany Spotlight
 
Public Company Valuation - Babson College Project
Public Company Valuation - Babson College ProjectPublic Company Valuation - Babson College Project
Public Company Valuation - Babson College ProjectJohn W. Quinn
 
Mercer Capital's Portfolio Valuation: Private Equity Marks and Trends | Q1 2016
Mercer Capital's Portfolio Valuation: Private Equity Marks and Trends | Q1 2016Mercer Capital's Portfolio Valuation: Private Equity Marks and Trends | Q1 2016
Mercer Capital's Portfolio Valuation: Private Equity Marks and Trends | Q1 2016Mercer Capital
 
DOMINION RESOURCES REPORT - FINAL
DOMINION RESOURCES REPORT - FINALDOMINION RESOURCES REPORT - FINAL
DOMINION RESOURCES REPORT - FINALMichael W. Staib
 
Global Insight- Quality Check
Global Insight- Quality CheckGlobal Insight- Quality Check
Global Insight- Quality CheckDavid Apted
 
TEAM B - DOMINION RESOURCES - FINALIZED
TEAM B - DOMINION RESOURCES - FINALIZEDTEAM B - DOMINION RESOURCES - FINALIZED
TEAM B - DOMINION RESOURCES - FINALIZEDMichael W. Staib
 
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016Pegasus Property Funds™
 
Michael Durante Western Reserve 1Q05
Michael Durante Western Reserve 1Q05Michael Durante Western Reserve 1Q05
Michael Durante Western Reserve 1Q05Michael Durante
 
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT FUND (ELD) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT FUND (ELD) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT FUND (ELD) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT FUND (ELD) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016Pegasus Property Funds™
 
IDFC Bond Fund Income Plan_Fund spotlight
IDFC Bond Fund Income Plan_Fund spotlightIDFC Bond Fund Income Plan_Fund spotlight
IDFC Bond Fund Income Plan_Fund spotlightIDFCJUBI
 
Lvs 1 q15 earnings deck vfinal 3
Lvs 1 q15 earnings deck vfinal 3Lvs 1 q15 earnings deck vfinal 3
Lvs 1 q15 earnings deck vfinal 3Investor_lvs
 

What's hot (20)

Legacy Reserves October 2013 Investor Presentation
Legacy Reserves October 2013 Investor PresentationLegacy Reserves October 2013 Investor Presentation
Legacy Reserves October 2013 Investor Presentation
 
Chevron.Cvx.Au2010.Dcj
Chevron.Cvx.Au2010.DcjChevron.Cvx.Au2010.Dcj
Chevron.Cvx.Au2010.Dcj
 
Element Investment Managers
Element Investment ManagersElement Investment Managers
Element Investment Managers
 
Bateleur
BateleurBateleur
Bateleur
 
Stanlib
StanlibStanlib
Stanlib
 
Public Company Valuation - Babson College Project
Public Company Valuation - Babson College ProjectPublic Company Valuation - Babson College Project
Public Company Valuation - Babson College Project
 
Mercer Capital's Portfolio Valuation: Private Equity Marks and Trends | Q1 2016
Mercer Capital's Portfolio Valuation: Private Equity Marks and Trends | Q1 2016Mercer Capital's Portfolio Valuation: Private Equity Marks and Trends | Q1 2016
Mercer Capital's Portfolio Valuation: Private Equity Marks and Trends | Q1 2016
 
MEMORANDUM NPV
MEMORANDUM NPVMEMORANDUM NPV
MEMORANDUM NPV
 
DOMINION RESOURCES REPORT - FINAL
DOMINION RESOURCES REPORT - FINALDOMINION RESOURCES REPORT - FINAL
DOMINION RESOURCES REPORT - FINAL
 
Ashburton March 2017
Ashburton March 2017Ashburton March 2017
Ashburton March 2017
 
Global Insight- Quality Check
Global Insight- Quality CheckGlobal Insight- Quality Check
Global Insight- Quality Check
 
TEAM B - DOMINION RESOURCES - FINALIZED
TEAM B - DOMINION RESOURCES - FINALIZEDTEAM B - DOMINION RESOURCES - FINALIZED
TEAM B - DOMINION RESOURCES - FINALIZED
 
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION FUND (ELDC) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016
 
Michael Durante Western Reserve 1Q05
Michael Durante Western Reserve 1Q05Michael Durante Western Reserve 1Q05
Michael Durante Western Reserve 1Q05
 
Pms september152017v2
Pms september152017v2Pms september152017v2
Pms september152017v2
 
Pms september152017v3
Pms september152017v3Pms september152017v3
Pms september152017v3
 
University of Toronto - St. George - Presentation
University of Toronto - St. George - PresentationUniversity of Toronto - St. George - Presentation
University of Toronto - St. George - Presentation
 
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT FUND (ELD) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT FUND (ELD) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT FUND (ELD) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016
PPF ECUADOR LAND DEVELOPMENT FUND (ELD) A-SHARES (ENG) JULY 2016
 
IDFC Bond Fund Income Plan_Fund spotlight
IDFC Bond Fund Income Plan_Fund spotlightIDFC Bond Fund Income Plan_Fund spotlight
IDFC Bond Fund Income Plan_Fund spotlight
 
Lvs 1 q15 earnings deck vfinal 3
Lvs 1 q15 earnings deck vfinal 3Lvs 1 q15 earnings deck vfinal 3
Lvs 1 q15 earnings deck vfinal 3
 

Similar to CXP initiation - Office REIT

Released Nov.16 2016 - Fundamental Research Corp. eXp World Holdings, Inc. (O...
Released Nov.16 2016 - Fundamental Research Corp. eXp World Holdings, Inc. (O...Released Nov.16 2016 - Fundamental Research Corp. eXp World Holdings, Inc. (O...
Released Nov.16 2016 - Fundamental Research Corp. eXp World Holdings, Inc. (O...Follow me on Twitter @Stockshaman
 
2016 wells fargo no appendix
2016 wells fargo no appendix2016 wells fargo no appendix
2016 wells fargo no appendixir_styronllc
 
TRNC Q217 Earnings Presentation
TRNC Q217 Earnings PresentationTRNC Q217 Earnings Presentation
TRNC Q217 Earnings PresentationtribuneIR
 
Psx 2017 baml conference presentation final for posting
Psx 2017 baml conference presentation final for postingPsx 2017 baml conference presentation final for posting
Psx 2017 baml conference presentation final for postinginvestor_phillips66
 
20170313 sauc roth conference presentation final
20170313 sauc roth conference presentation final20170313 sauc roth conference presentation final
20170313 sauc roth conference presentation finaldrhincorporated
 
SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: An Open-ended Dynamic Asset Allocation Sch...
SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: An Open-ended Dynamic Asset Allocation Sch...SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: An Open-ended Dynamic Asset Allocation Sch...
SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: An Open-ended Dynamic Asset Allocation Sch...SBI Mutual Fund
 
Earnings 4Q15 Presentation
Earnings 4Q15 PresentationEarnings 4Q15 Presentation
Earnings 4Q15 Presentationir_digitalrealty
 
Q4 2016 - Management Investor Presentation
Q4 2016 - Management Investor PresentationQ4 2016 - Management Investor Presentation
Q4 2016 - Management Investor PresentationRioCan
 
Financial services sector - implications of FOFA, possible acquires of SFW, S...
Financial services sector - implications of FOFA, possible acquires of SFW, S...Financial services sector - implications of FOFA, possible acquires of SFW, S...
Financial services sector - implications of FOFA, possible acquires of SFW, S...George Gabriel
 
SFW - FOFA implications, Sum of parts valuation, possible acquirers
SFW - FOFA implications, Sum of parts valuation, possible acquirers SFW - FOFA implications, Sum of parts valuation, possible acquirers
SFW - FOFA implications, Sum of parts valuation, possible acquirers George Gabriel
 
Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...
Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...
Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...George Gabriel
 
Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...
Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...
Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...George Gabriel
 
Midwest IDEAS Conference
Midwest IDEAS ConferenceMidwest IDEAS Conference
Midwest IDEAS Conferencedrhincorporated
 
Rexnord Corporation (RXN) Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2016 Earnings Release
Rexnord Corporation (RXN) Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2016 Earnings Release Rexnord Corporation (RXN) Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2016 Earnings Release
Rexnord Corporation (RXN) Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2016 Earnings Release Rexnord
 
SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: A Hybrid Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16
SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: A Hybrid Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: A Hybrid Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16
SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: A Hybrid Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16SBI Mutual Fund
 
Dlr 1 q16 earnings presentation
Dlr 1 q16 earnings presentationDlr 1 q16 earnings presentation
Dlr 1 q16 earnings presentationir_digitalrealty
 
Eigh apr 2016 investor presentation
Eigh apr 2016 investor presentationEigh apr 2016 investor presentation
Eigh apr 2016 investor presentationRupesh Patil
 

Similar to CXP initiation - Office REIT (20)

Released Nov.16 2016 - Fundamental Research Corp. eXp World Holdings, Inc. (O...
Released Nov.16 2016 - Fundamental Research Corp. eXp World Holdings, Inc. (O...Released Nov.16 2016 - Fundamental Research Corp. eXp World Holdings, Inc. (O...
Released Nov.16 2016 - Fundamental Research Corp. eXp World Holdings, Inc. (O...
 
DEA Initiation Report
DEA Initiation ReportDEA Initiation Report
DEA Initiation Report
 
Cowen
CowenCowen
Cowen
 
2016 wells fargo no appendix
2016 wells fargo no appendix2016 wells fargo no appendix
2016 wells fargo no appendix
 
TRNC Q217 Earnings Presentation
TRNC Q217 Earnings PresentationTRNC Q217 Earnings Presentation
TRNC Q217 Earnings Presentation
 
Psx 2017 baml conference presentation final for posting
Psx 2017 baml conference presentation final for postingPsx 2017 baml conference presentation final for posting
Psx 2017 baml conference presentation final for posting
 
20170313 sauc roth conference presentation final
20170313 sauc roth conference presentation final20170313 sauc roth conference presentation final
20170313 sauc roth conference presentation final
 
SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: An Open-ended Dynamic Asset Allocation Sch...
SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: An Open-ended Dynamic Asset Allocation Sch...SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: An Open-ended Dynamic Asset Allocation Sch...
SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: An Open-ended Dynamic Asset Allocation Sch...
 
Earnings 4Q15 Presentation
Earnings 4Q15 PresentationEarnings 4Q15 Presentation
Earnings 4Q15 Presentation
 
Q4 2016 - Management Investor Presentation
Q4 2016 - Management Investor PresentationQ4 2016 - Management Investor Presentation
Q4 2016 - Management Investor Presentation
 
Financial services sector - implications of FOFA, possible acquires of SFW, S...
Financial services sector - implications of FOFA, possible acquires of SFW, S...Financial services sector - implications of FOFA, possible acquires of SFW, S...
Financial services sector - implications of FOFA, possible acquires of SFW, S...
 
SFW - FOFA implications, Sum of parts valuation, possible acquirers
SFW - FOFA implications, Sum of parts valuation, possible acquirers SFW - FOFA implications, Sum of parts valuation, possible acquirers
SFW - FOFA implications, Sum of parts valuation, possible acquirers
 
Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...
Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...
Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...
 
Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...
Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...
Computershare (CPU) initiation report - well-priced quality franchise with fr...
 
Midwest IDEAS Conference
Midwest IDEAS ConferenceMidwest IDEAS Conference
Midwest IDEAS Conference
 
Rexnord Corporation (RXN) Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2016 Earnings Release
Rexnord Corporation (RXN) Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2016 Earnings Release Rexnord Corporation (RXN) Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2016 Earnings Release
Rexnord Corporation (RXN) Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2016 Earnings Release
 
SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: A Hybrid Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16
SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: A Hybrid Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: A Hybrid Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16
SBI Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund: A Hybrid Mutual Fund Scheme - Aug 16
 
Dlr 1 q16 earnings presentation
Dlr 1 q16 earnings presentationDlr 1 q16 earnings presentation
Dlr 1 q16 earnings presentation
 
Eigh apr 2016 investor presentation
Eigh apr 2016 investor presentationEigh apr 2016 investor presentation
Eigh apr 2016 investor presentation
 
SCHW Initiation
SCHW InitiationSCHW Initiation
SCHW Initiation
 

More from Kevin Cheng, CFA

Equity Strategy - Consumer Staples
Equity Strategy - Consumer StaplesEquity Strategy - Consumer Staples
Equity Strategy - Consumer StaplesKevin Cheng, CFA
 
Brookfield Office Properties - BPO - Quarterly Earnings
Brookfield Office Properties - BPO - Quarterly EarningsBrookfield Office Properties - BPO - Quarterly Earnings
Brookfield Office Properties - BPO - Quarterly EarningsKevin Cheng, CFA
 
First Capital Realty - FCR
First Capital Realty - FCRFirst Capital Realty - FCR
First Capital Realty - FCRKevin Cheng, CFA
 
Canadian Asset Managers - Initiation Report
Canadian Asset Managers - Initiation ReportCanadian Asset Managers - Initiation Report
Canadian Asset Managers - Initiation ReportKevin Cheng, CFA
 
Equity Strategy - Staying Defensive
Equity Strategy - Staying DefensiveEquity Strategy - Staying Defensive
Equity Strategy - Staying DefensiveKevin Cheng, CFA
 
Asset Managers - Recession risks, Trust Banks & Asset Mgrs
Asset Managers - Recession risks, Trust Banks & Asset MgrsAsset Managers - Recession risks, Trust Banks & Asset Mgrs
Asset Managers - Recession risks, Trust Banks & Asset MgrsKevin Cheng, CFA
 
Asset Managers - Defensive But Not Immune
Asset Managers - Defensive But Not ImmuneAsset Managers - Defensive But Not Immune
Asset Managers - Defensive But Not ImmuneKevin Cheng, CFA
 

More from Kevin Cheng, CFA (13)

Equity Strategy - Consumer Staples
Equity Strategy - Consumer StaplesEquity Strategy - Consumer Staples
Equity Strategy - Consumer Staples
 
Brookfield Office Properties - BPO - Quarterly Earnings
Brookfield Office Properties - BPO - Quarterly EarningsBrookfield Office Properties - BPO - Quarterly Earnings
Brookfield Office Properties - BPO - Quarterly Earnings
 
First Capital Realty - FCR
First Capital Realty - FCRFirst Capital Realty - FCR
First Capital Realty - FCR
 
Equity Strategy - TSX
Equity Strategy - TSXEquity Strategy - TSX
Equity Strategy - TSX
 
Focus - Economic Research
Focus - Economic ResearchFocus - Economic Research
Focus - Economic Research
 
Canadian Asset Managers - Initiation Report
Canadian Asset Managers - Initiation ReportCanadian Asset Managers - Initiation Report
Canadian Asset Managers - Initiation Report
 
Agf market outlook
Agf market outlookAgf market outlook
Agf market outlook
 
Equity Strategy - Staying Defensive
Equity Strategy - Staying DefensiveEquity Strategy - Staying Defensive
Equity Strategy - Staying Defensive
 
Asset Managers - Recession risks, Trust Banks & Asset Mgrs
Asset Managers - Recession risks, Trust Banks & Asset MgrsAsset Managers - Recession risks, Trust Banks & Asset Mgrs
Asset Managers - Recession risks, Trust Banks & Asset Mgrs
 
Asset Managers - Defensive But Not Immune
Asset Managers - Defensive But Not ImmuneAsset Managers - Defensive But Not Immune
Asset Managers - Defensive But Not Immune
 
The deleveraging cycle
The deleveraging cycleThe deleveraging cycle
The deleveraging cycle
 
Market Strategy
Market StrategyMarket Strategy
Market Strategy
 
U.S. Real Rates
U.S. Real RatesU.S. Real Rates
U.S. Real Rates
 

Recently uploaded

The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 22.pdf
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 22.pdfThe Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 22.pdf
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 22.pdfGale Pooley
 
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Serampore 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Serampore 👉 8250192130  Available With RoomVIP Kolkata Call Girl Serampore 👉 8250192130  Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Serampore 👉 8250192130 Available With Roomdivyansh0kumar0
 
VIP Call Girls LB Nagar ( Hyderabad ) Phone 8250192130 | ₹5k To 25k With Room...
VIP Call Girls LB Nagar ( Hyderabad ) Phone 8250192130 | ₹5k To 25k With Room...VIP Call Girls LB Nagar ( Hyderabad ) Phone 8250192130 | ₹5k To 25k With Room...
VIP Call Girls LB Nagar ( Hyderabad ) Phone 8250192130 | ₹5k To 25k With Room...Suhani Kapoor
 
05_Annelore Lenoir_Docbyte_MeetupDora&Cybersecurity.pptx
05_Annelore Lenoir_Docbyte_MeetupDora&Cybersecurity.pptx05_Annelore Lenoir_Docbyte_MeetupDora&Cybersecurity.pptx
05_Annelore Lenoir_Docbyte_MeetupDora&Cybersecurity.pptxFinTech Belgium
 
Solution Manual for Financial Accounting, 11th Edition by Robert Libby, Patri...
Solution Manual for Financial Accounting, 11th Edition by Robert Libby, Patri...Solution Manual for Financial Accounting, 11th Edition by Robert Libby, Patri...
Solution Manual for Financial Accounting, 11th Edition by Robert Libby, Patri...ssifa0344
 
Dividend Policy and Dividend Decision Theories.pptx
Dividend Policy and Dividend Decision Theories.pptxDividend Policy and Dividend Decision Theories.pptx
Dividend Policy and Dividend Decision Theories.pptxanshikagoel52
 
High Class Call Girls Nashik Maya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nashik
High Class Call Girls Nashik Maya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service NashikHigh Class Call Girls Nashik Maya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nashik
High Class Call Girls Nashik Maya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service NashikCall Girls in Nagpur High Profile
 
Pooja 9892124323 : Call Girl in Juhu Escorts Service Free Home Delivery
Pooja 9892124323 : Call Girl in Juhu Escorts Service Free Home DeliveryPooja 9892124323 : Call Girl in Juhu Escorts Service Free Home Delivery
Pooja 9892124323 : Call Girl in Juhu Escorts Service Free Home DeliveryPooja Nehwal
 
Call US 📞 9892124323 ✅ Kurla Call Girls In Kurla ( Mumbai ) secure service
Call US 📞 9892124323 ✅ Kurla Call Girls In Kurla ( Mumbai ) secure serviceCall US 📞 9892124323 ✅ Kurla Call Girls In Kurla ( Mumbai ) secure service
Call US 📞 9892124323 ✅ Kurla Call Girls In Kurla ( Mumbai ) secure servicePooja Nehwal
 
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Jodhpur Park 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Jodhpur Park 👉 8250192130  Available With RoomVIP Kolkata Call Girl Jodhpur Park 👉 8250192130  Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Jodhpur Park 👉 8250192130 Available With Roomdivyansh0kumar0
 
Solution Manual for Principles of Corporate Finance 14th Edition by Richard B...
Solution Manual for Principles of Corporate Finance 14th Edition by Richard B...Solution Manual for Principles of Corporate Finance 14th Edition by Richard B...
Solution Manual for Principles of Corporate Finance 14th Edition by Richard B...ssifa0344
 
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 30.pdf
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 30.pdfThe Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 30.pdf
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 30.pdfGale Pooley
 
High Class Call Girls Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Class Call Girls Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsHigh Class Call Girls Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Class Call Girls Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escortsranjana rawat
 
(DIYA) Bhumkar Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(DIYA) Bhumkar Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...(DIYA) Bhumkar Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(DIYA) Bhumkar Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...ranjana rawat
 
VVIP Pune Call Girls Katraj (7001035870) Pune Escorts Nearby with Complete Sa...
VVIP Pune Call Girls Katraj (7001035870) Pune Escorts Nearby with Complete Sa...VVIP Pune Call Girls Katraj (7001035870) Pune Escorts Nearby with Complete Sa...
VVIP Pune Call Girls Katraj (7001035870) Pune Escorts Nearby with Complete Sa...Call Girls in Nagpur High Profile
 
TEST BANK For Corporate Finance, 13th Edition By Stephen Ross, Randolph Weste...
TEST BANK For Corporate Finance, 13th Edition By Stephen Ross, Randolph Weste...TEST BANK For Corporate Finance, 13th Edition By Stephen Ross, Randolph Weste...
TEST BANK For Corporate Finance, 13th Edition By Stephen Ross, Randolph Weste...ssifa0344
 
Log your LOA pain with Pension Lab's brilliant campaign
Log your LOA pain with Pension Lab's brilliant campaignLog your LOA pain with Pension Lab's brilliant campaign
Log your LOA pain with Pension Lab's brilliant campaignHenry Tapper
 
Instant Issue Debit Cards - School Designs
Instant Issue Debit Cards - School DesignsInstant Issue Debit Cards - School Designs
Instant Issue Debit Cards - School Designsegoetzinger
 

Recently uploaded (20)

The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 22.pdf
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 22.pdfThe Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 22.pdf
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 22.pdf
 
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Serampore 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Serampore 👉 8250192130  Available With RoomVIP Kolkata Call Girl Serampore 👉 8250192130  Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Serampore 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
 
VIP Call Girls LB Nagar ( Hyderabad ) Phone 8250192130 | ₹5k To 25k With Room...
VIP Call Girls LB Nagar ( Hyderabad ) Phone 8250192130 | ₹5k To 25k With Room...VIP Call Girls LB Nagar ( Hyderabad ) Phone 8250192130 | ₹5k To 25k With Room...
VIP Call Girls LB Nagar ( Hyderabad ) Phone 8250192130 | ₹5k To 25k With Room...
 
05_Annelore Lenoir_Docbyte_MeetupDora&Cybersecurity.pptx
05_Annelore Lenoir_Docbyte_MeetupDora&Cybersecurity.pptx05_Annelore Lenoir_Docbyte_MeetupDora&Cybersecurity.pptx
05_Annelore Lenoir_Docbyte_MeetupDora&Cybersecurity.pptx
 
Solution Manual for Financial Accounting, 11th Edition by Robert Libby, Patri...
Solution Manual for Financial Accounting, 11th Edition by Robert Libby, Patri...Solution Manual for Financial Accounting, 11th Edition by Robert Libby, Patri...
Solution Manual for Financial Accounting, 11th Edition by Robert Libby, Patri...
 
Dividend Policy and Dividend Decision Theories.pptx
Dividend Policy and Dividend Decision Theories.pptxDividend Policy and Dividend Decision Theories.pptx
Dividend Policy and Dividend Decision Theories.pptx
 
High Class Call Girls Nashik Maya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nashik
High Class Call Girls Nashik Maya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service NashikHigh Class Call Girls Nashik Maya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nashik
High Class Call Girls Nashik Maya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nashik
 
Pooja 9892124323 : Call Girl in Juhu Escorts Service Free Home Delivery
Pooja 9892124323 : Call Girl in Juhu Escorts Service Free Home DeliveryPooja 9892124323 : Call Girl in Juhu Escorts Service Free Home Delivery
Pooja 9892124323 : Call Girl in Juhu Escorts Service Free Home Delivery
 
Call US 📞 9892124323 ✅ Kurla Call Girls In Kurla ( Mumbai ) secure service
Call US 📞 9892124323 ✅ Kurla Call Girls In Kurla ( Mumbai ) secure serviceCall US 📞 9892124323 ✅ Kurla Call Girls In Kurla ( Mumbai ) secure service
Call US 📞 9892124323 ✅ Kurla Call Girls In Kurla ( Mumbai ) secure service
 
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Jodhpur Park 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Jodhpur Park 👉 8250192130  Available With RoomVIP Kolkata Call Girl Jodhpur Park 👉 8250192130  Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Jodhpur Park 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
 
Solution Manual for Principles of Corporate Finance 14th Edition by Richard B...
Solution Manual for Principles of Corporate Finance 14th Edition by Richard B...Solution Manual for Principles of Corporate Finance 14th Edition by Richard B...
Solution Manual for Principles of Corporate Finance 14th Edition by Richard B...
 
Commercial Bank Economic Capsule - April 2024
Commercial Bank Economic Capsule - April 2024Commercial Bank Economic Capsule - April 2024
Commercial Bank Economic Capsule - April 2024
 
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 30.pdf
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 30.pdfThe Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 30.pdf
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 30.pdf
 
High Class Call Girls Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Class Call Girls Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsHigh Class Call Girls Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Class Call Girls Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
 
Veritas Interim Report 1 January–31 March 2024
Veritas Interim Report 1 January–31 March 2024Veritas Interim Report 1 January–31 March 2024
Veritas Interim Report 1 January–31 March 2024
 
(DIYA) Bhumkar Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(DIYA) Bhumkar Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...(DIYA) Bhumkar Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(DIYA) Bhumkar Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
 
VVIP Pune Call Girls Katraj (7001035870) Pune Escorts Nearby with Complete Sa...
VVIP Pune Call Girls Katraj (7001035870) Pune Escorts Nearby with Complete Sa...VVIP Pune Call Girls Katraj (7001035870) Pune Escorts Nearby with Complete Sa...
VVIP Pune Call Girls Katraj (7001035870) Pune Escorts Nearby with Complete Sa...
 
TEST BANK For Corporate Finance, 13th Edition By Stephen Ross, Randolph Weste...
TEST BANK For Corporate Finance, 13th Edition By Stephen Ross, Randolph Weste...TEST BANK For Corporate Finance, 13th Edition By Stephen Ross, Randolph Weste...
TEST BANK For Corporate Finance, 13th Edition By Stephen Ross, Randolph Weste...
 
Log your LOA pain with Pension Lab's brilliant campaign
Log your LOA pain with Pension Lab's brilliant campaignLog your LOA pain with Pension Lab's brilliant campaign
Log your LOA pain with Pension Lab's brilliant campaign
 
Instant Issue Debit Cards - School Designs
Instant Issue Debit Cards - School DesignsInstant Issue Debit Cards - School Designs
Instant Issue Debit Cards - School Designs
 

CXP initiation - Office REIT