This document discusses noise abatement procedures for aircraft operators. It recommends that pilots complete noise abatement training and take steps to minimize noise when flying over populated areas. Operators are advised to have a noise policy, respond to complaints, and educate customers and the public on their efforts to reduce noise. Landowners are asked to notify people who may be affected by aircraft noise from planned operations. The overall goal is to preserve amenity values and limit the environmental impact of aircraft noise through proactive industry approaches.
2. Intro
Aircare
‘Front-footing legislation’
Noise Abatement Code of Practice
‘It’s just about culture’
Noise
HAI Fly Neighbourly Program
Recap
Assessment
3. Noise abatement training provided by TAQ
and Richard Rayward CEO Air Safaris on
behalf of AIA
Whilst not targeted at fixed wing aeroplanes,
elements of this presentation and associated
Fly Neighbourly Program are adopted by this
code in order to deliver the same benefits.
4. February 2011 Department of Conservation
announced that DOC will require all aircraft
concession holders and all aircraft operators
that want to work in the DOC Estate to be
AIRCARE™ Accredited by April 2012.
Extended to 1/01/13 (incl. Milford) (24/01/12)
New Applications: on application or by
1/01/13 (whichever comes 1st.)
5. DOC will achieve this by mandating in the
CMS reviews currently underway.
Extended concessions
6. The biggest threat to aircraft activities is poorly
written legislation being developed to protect
the environment.
The way the industry is reacting to that is to
develop the AIRCARE™ Program
The AIRCARE™ Program is an enabling
program.
7.
8. The AIRCARE™ Accreditation Program
includes codes of practice about discharges
(Spraying, Topdressing & aerial poison drops)
engineering and Amenity Values (the Noise
Abatement Code)
9. SMS that sits above the codes requires that
operators are independently audited against
both the SMS and the codes.
To be awarded accreditation an operator has to
prove compliance with the relevant code(s)
every time they go to work.)
12. In accordance with the requirements to
preserve amenity values as described in the
RMA, aerial operators need to manage noise.
By following the principles detailed in this
code, that can be achieved.
13. This code forms part of the Environmental
Management System offered as part of the
AIRCARE SMS run by the Aviation Industry
Association of NZ.
It recognises the issues involved with the
operation of aircraft in and around noise
sensitive areas
Details a plan by which the aviation industry
and regulators can work together in order to
achieve the long term goal of limiting the noise
and environmental impact of aircraft
14. With a proactive approach the aviation
community can pre-empt legislation being
enforced upon the industry that could itself be
unworkable.
Does not address:
Aircraft
Noise measurement
15. Members of the aviation community are
invited to join this accreditation program that
both trains and measures pilots and operators
in ‘flying neighbourly’ and in noise abatement
methods.
The aviation community needs work with
regulators to identify measures that reduce the
impact of aircraft noise.
16. Amenity values
Means those natural or physical qualities and
characteristics of an area that contribute to people’s
appreciation of its pleasantness, aesthetic coherence, and
cultural and recreational attributes
Noise Sensitive Area
An area where the impact of adverse effects from noise
diminishes the amenity values of that area
Excludes CBD but may include residential areas and
smaller towns between 1900 – 0700.
Populous Area
A collection of ten residences or more in an area less than
two hectares, or a gathering of more than 100 people.
17. The Resource Management Act 1991
empowers legislators to control elements of aircraft
operations e.g. noise as it impacts on amenity values.
Does not control overflight
The Civil Aviation Act 1990
empowers the CAA to control aircraft operations.
The Civil Aviation Act does not empower CAA to
have any control of aircraft noise. Notwithstanding
this, the majority of complaints that CAA fields are
noise related
Does not control noise
18. The Conservation Act 1987,
Specifically Part 3B Concessions Section 170 (2) says
that no activity will be carried out in a conservation
area unless authorized by a concession.
The National Parks Act 1980
Specifically Section 14 Wilderness Areas s14(2)(d)
This clause prohibits aircraft landing or hovering in
Wilderness Areas.
19. What has changed??
RMA 1991
CA Act 1990
Conservation Act 1987
Nat. Parks Act 1980
Tolerance has changed
What was considered normal or acceptable in years
gone by is no longer so.
20.
21. Culture has to change
The measure of a pilot
Crashes
Productivity
Least breakages
Most versatile / professional/ lowest insurance risk
What is needed now is both helicopter and
fixed wing operators and pilots who adapt the
quickest
22.
23. Understanding the impact of noise on the
environment and on amenity values and how
that noise can be effectively managed is about:
Staying in business
Keeping your job
24. There are sounds that please us
And there are noises that disturb us
Not everyone likes the same types of noise
25. Irrespective of the sound /noise being
generated, the environment will dictate its
character.
F1 GP, Airshows, Jet ski carnivals
Churches, Nat. Parks, schools, hospitals, holiday
resorts, outdoor gatherings / concerts
More peaceful the environment the bigger the
impact
26. NOISE – CAUSE & REMEDIES
Fixed wing
Propeller (design & speeds) retrofitable
Settings & sync
Set RPM at lowest recommended setting in all flight
phases
100 rpm difference in mid-range of prop setting will
raise or lower noise emission by 3 - 5 dB.
High rpm very intrusive and increases at higher end of
prop rpm setting (2450 rpm upwards)
2600 – 2700 rpm setting can double perceived sound at
ground level (Rayward)
38. Stuff them. Ignore them and they will go away
Get right up ‘em. Best form of defence is attack.
There’s always a couple of moaners. No one
else seems to have a problem.
We were operating here long before they came
along.
39. Wait ‘til they break a leg. Then they’ll be
pleased to see us.
We’ve got a job to do, so they might as well get
used to it.
Not much I can do about it.
40. Some more sensitive to noise than others
Noise inducted vibration & rattle
A/c noise irritating low frequency content
Helicopter noise more irritating than f/wing
Periodic impulsive character
Personal judgement, fear and negative attitude
Industry’s response to these concerns……….
41. Confusion of legislation leads to unsatisfactory
results for complainants
Ignored or fobbed-off. Frustration
Concerns need to be listened to
Soon settle down when they realise they are
being heard
Nearly all will be satisfied when they see some
response to their concerns
42. For the purposes of this Code the word “shall” refers to
practices that are mandatory for compliance with the
Code and the word “should“ refers to practices that are
advised, recommended or are industry best practice.
43. Pilots
Attend & pass Fly Neighbourly training
Take all reasonable steps to minimise noise footprint
Comply with Code of Practice and company
procedures except:
Notify operator when conditions cannot be complied
with
44. To meet the requirements of this code pilots
shall complete the Fly Neighbourly training
program and pass an assessment set by the
AIA.
The term of this qualification shall be three years.
The Fly Neighbourly Guide upon which this
training is based is included as Appendix 1.
45. Pilots shall take all reasonable steps to
minimize their noise footprint. In flight, pilots
should observe the following noise abatement
procedures:
Avoid noise-sensitive areas where possible
Follow high ambient noise routes
Maintain an altitude as high as possible
Fly normal cruising speed or slower
Avoid sharp manoeuvres
46. use steep takeoff and descent profiles
(helicopters only) – Vy -5kts
Operate (f/wing)propellers at the low end of
the propeller recommended RPM operating
range for all phases of the flight.
Vary the route, repetition contributes to
annoyance.
47. For low level operations – use techniques that
minimise the noise footprint:
operating RPM (rotor or prop).
keeping high ground or shelter belts between flight
tracks and any nearby residence
hours of operation and timing of operation.
Where company (or User Group) operating
areas or transit routes are developed, confine
flights to those places.
48. Comply with the Code of Practice except
where they would conflict with:
Flight safety, or
C A Rules, or ATC clearances or instructions, or
Passenger comfort.
A/c limitations
Pilots unable to comply with company Policy
or guidelines in respect to noise abatement
shall document the event and notify the
operator using an Event Notification form.
49. Operators
Policy on noise minimisation and plan operations
accordingly
Emphasise awareness of noise sensitive areas
Consider fleet , a/c type selection
Maintain a noise complaints register
Ensure staff attendance at FN courses
Ensure pilot’s ongoing awareness and
understanding of noise minimisation
50. Operators (cont.)
Include FN in Management Review Meetings
Promote customer education
Maintain active participation in Airspace User
Groups
51. To meet the requirements of this code
operators shall:
Maintain a policy on noise minimisation that shall be
promoted to all staff.
This policy shall reflect the operator’s intent to
reduce the amount of noise created by aircraft and
other equipment. ????
The policy will identify current and anticipated
areas of noise concern.
52. To meet the requirements of this code
operators shall:
Plan flight ops in accordance with noise abatement
procedures to minimize the impact of aircraft
movements giving consideration to:
a/c type selected
Time of day or week to be least obtrusive.
In sensitive areas, develop the location of operational
areas and transit routes in consultation with the any
relevant parties or local authorities.
53. To meet the requirements of this code
operators shall:
Assist flight crews and operations personnel to
develop responsible mission profiles without
infringing on operational reality, without conflicting
with CARs, ATC instructions, or a/c operating
limitations.
These guidelines shall emphasize awareness of
sensitive routes and landing areas.
54. To meet the requirements of this code
operators shall:
For low level operations near populous areas,
consider the fleet and select an aircraft type that has
the least intrusive noise footprint.
55. Maintain a register of noise complaints including:
the name and address of the complainant,
location of the concern and
the date and time to which the event refers.
corrective and preventative actions undertaken
Evaluate and discuss with pilot concerned.
Review procedures
56. To meet the requirements of this code
operators shall ensure all relevant staff:
attend the Fly Neighbourly training course
pass an assessment on the noise abatement
procedures detailed in that course.
undergo recurrent training and assessment every
three years.
57. Operators shall ensure pilots awareness and
understanding of the following is assessed during
routine company flight checks (FCCC, Ag Comp.)
Contents and updates of manufacturers published noise
abatement information (Flt. Manual Supps)
Documented company noise abatement policies and
procedures
Operational noise minimisation techniques
58.
59. To meet the requirements of this code
operators shall:
As part of regular Management Review Meetings
(required under the AIRCARE Environmental
Management System), ensure that the noise
minimisation policy is considered to ensure that it is
still relevant in respect to any changing conditions or
legislation and that it is revised when required.
60. To meet the requirements of this code
operators shall:
Educate customers about noise abatement
prevent or minimize conflicts between their
expectations and company policy.
Where a User Group has been established maintain
membership and take an active part in its activities.
Strive for continuous improvement .
61. It is recommended that operators adopting this
code of practice should:
Where possible, when operations below 500ft AGL
are anticipated, arrange notification to all affected
parties near the proposed flight path.
Promote the safety record and the benefits of aircraft
use to improve public acceptance of aircraft.
Develop good working relations with the media
presenting favourable aircraft related media
coverage of events, achievements and outcomes
including Fly Neighbourly seminars.
62. It is recommended that operators adopting this
code of practice should:
Engage in public relations to develop awareness of the
the company’s Fly Neighbourly Program through
attendance at meetings of local government, government
agencies, service clubs and environmental groups.
Utilise demonstrations and press conferences covering
such capabilities as fire fighting, emergency medical
evacuation, search and rescue and the benefits of aircraft
transportation to the general public.
64. When aircraft operations are planned over
sensitive areas, it is the responsibility of the
Land Owner/Administrator to notify people
who could be adversely affected by the aircraft
noise.
Doing this will reduce the element of surprise
and disappointment that often lead to
frustration for visitors and
owners/administrators alike.
65. Examples:
Restaurant / lodge owners - neighbours
Visitors to the DOC Estate – a/c noise
Visitors to National – a/c noise and track / hut
work
Landowners/Administrators should work
with aircraft operators to identify flight routes
that will cause the minimum of noise nuisance.
66. Acceptance of aircraft activities is, in general,
poor.
Engender acceptance. Provide media with :
valid and favourable aviation related information
(e.g. press releases - good news stories)
SAR ops, local police support, fire fighting
Get involved with Govt agencies –
Influence their thinking and decisions
Partner with them to promote your services
67. Publicise F/N seminars and initiatives
Front-foot it with:
Changes to operational practices
Establishing a new base
Consider safety, operational and environmental issues
Develop a public acceptance program
Programs to prevent or resolve complaints
Use the media to project positive relations
Utilise local, national and trade media
Av News, Pac Wings, Kiwi Flyer etc.
68.
69. Fly Neighbourly Committee est. 1981
Matt Zucarro HAI Pres.
www.rotor.com
Fly Neighbourly Guide
Fly Neighbourly Pamphlet
Responding to community concerns
Sample complaint forms
Training CD and DVD
70. Introduction
Recognise impact operations have on noise
Recognising the risks in not addressing noise
concerns
Sources of helicopter noise
Recognise the main noise generators on a helicopter
Recognise which noise source dominates each flight
regime
71. Other factors influencing noise
The effect of distance on sound
The effect of temp, humidity and wind on sound
The effect of terrain on sound
What manufacturers are doing
Introduction to what steps manufacturers are
taking to reduce helicopter noise
Understanding new design features being
examined for future noise reduction
72.
73. The pilots role in noise abatement
Recognise the need for noise abatement
Recognise the pilot attitude factors in noise
abatement
General guidelines for reducing helicopter noise
Specific noise abatement procedures
Recognise the need for general noise abatement
procedures
Noise abatement procedures specific to your
make and model of helicopter
83. Avoid noise sensitive areas
Fly higher – fly slower over sensitive areas
Reduce rrpm or prop rpm over sensitive areas
Modify flight profiles
Hover – climb – en-route –descent profiles
Hover turns
Avoid BVI slap regions
Situational (environmental)awareness
84. Individual aircraft operating techniques for
noise mitigation
Be familiar with the ones you operate and put them
into practice
Pro-active liaison with community
Be responsive to, record, and correct
community concerns and perceptions
85. Be sure to complete name and other details
Closed book
Tick the option(s) that is correct
Some questions may have more than one correct
option
Rotary pilot questions /f/wing pilot questions
Review answers
Assessment by AIA
Individual certificates issued by mail
Editor's Notes
[ 6] HOW
So how is this going to be managed and monitored??
In a couple of slides time we will depict a flow chart intended to put the whole Aircare business into perspective.
Essentially Aircare will be underpinned by various “industry written” Codes of Practice” addressing discharges to the environment.
Agricultural operators will already be familiar with Codes of Practice addressing discharges to the air, the land and water (Growsafe/Spreadmark & VTA). There is another CoP under development for the engineering fraternity addressing discharges to the environment by way of disposal of oils, chemicals, paint strippers, rags and other waste products. The next issue is the one we are addressing today – Environmental Noise termed in legislation as “Amenity Values” but which we will be referring to as the Noise Abatement Code of Practice
10] Code of Practice Intro
The first bullet is taken from from the Resource Management Act. – “Aerial operators need to manage noise.”
The requirement to do so is already written in legislation and has been there since 1991 (20 years)
Again, the crux of the whole session is to impress upon attendees that currently – while the need to manage noise is written in legislation – there are not yet any Rules telling operators how to do this (Recall rhs of Aircare flow chart Slide 10)
The whole concept of the Noise Abatement CoP is to encourage operators to manage noise before someone in Wellington decides that Rules have to be written. ‘Rules’ that most likely will not be written by people who know, and be written in a way that will not be ‘enabling’
[12] Code of Practice – 3
First bullet reinforces the slide 12 but needs to be repeated because this is what it’s all about.
It is important, at this stage, to highlight two issues that the CoP specifically does not address:
The CoP does not require operators to change their aircraft to quieter ones. The CoP recognises there are horses for courses and some aircraft in use will make more noise than others. That remains a fact of business.
HOWEVER – the CoP does require that an operator considers the possible benefits arising from purchasing a more environmentally friendly aircraft type when a change in aircraft or fleet replacement comes along as part of usual business
The CoP does not address the measurement of noise in decibels or the measurement of the reduction in noise. This is because noise measurement is a very complicated science (far more complicated than can be gone into here) and requirements to measure noise can be very expensive. This CoP deals with the CULTURE of noise management.
[14] Definitions: (Q!!)
Amenity values – This definition was not dreamt up by the Aircare authors! It is a quote taken straight from existing legislation and can be found in the RMA 1991
Noise Sensitive Area – Emphasise that Central Business Districts already generate plenty of noise so are not considered noise sensitive – but realistically smaller towns and residential areas can be considered so during evenings, the hours of darkness and early mornings.
Noise sensitive areas may be permanent – such as National Parks or hospitals. Or they may be temporary - such as Churches and schools (while in session), they may be cowsheds during milking or paddocks during spring lambing/calving/fawning, or outdoor events.
Populous Area – This definition is an attempt to define an area on the ground that could realistically be considered to be ‘populous’. It is not hard & fast (no-one will be counting if there are 9 residences or the area is just over 10 ha.
The real test is to look out the window and think ”Is the noise I am generating with this aircraft affecting people (or stock) on the ground?”
If your answer is Yes – then you are in the vicinity of a noise sensitive area
[16] Legislation (cont)
Conservation Act – Interfaces with aviation via the Concessions section – pending the re-write of the Conservation Management Strategies (CMS’s) no specific reference to aviation noise.
National Parks Act – Interfaces with aviation via the Wilderness Areas section that allows for prohibition of landing or hovering in designated Wilderness Areas
A little bit about noises and sounds.
It is important to stress the point that not everyone has the same opinion as each of us.
To us ‘sounds’ might be – a 400 Fletcher working, a merlin engine, the wine of a spooling up turbine, a radial engine
‘noises’ might be – head-banging music, crying kids, or the volume that goes up during TV ads
Other people may have completely different views and it is important to understand that the sound that we make with our aircraft, to them is a highly intrusive and unpleasant “noise”
Props
Note from this shot the multiple (4) blades with the scimitar shaped tips designed to reduce noise
(Increased ground clearance is also achieved)
[33] Code of Practice Noise Abatement
[34] Code of conduct - Pilots
[35] Responsibilities – pilots Q!!
[36] Responsibilities – pilots Q!!
[37] Responsibilities – pilot Q!!
No suggestion to descend below shelter-belts
[38] Responsibilities – pilots
judicious rider / disclaimer
[39] Responsibilities – Operators
My knowledge of auditors – this is the stuff they will be asking about.
[40] Responsibilities –operators (cont.)
[41] Responsibilities – operators cont
[42] Responsibilities – operators cont Q!!
[43] Responsibilities – operators Q!!
[44] Responsibilities- operators
[45] Operator responsibilities cont. Q!!
[46] Operator responsibilities Q!!
AIA initiatives – challenge AIA
Operators to contribute good stories (see HAI website)
AIA to promote FN tomedia
L/ level ops – Skyline example
[47] Operator responsibilities – Recommendations Q!!
Previous examples of applications stating we’ll Fly neighbourly – but no idea.
[48] Responsibilities Land owners Q!!
[49] Responsibilities Land owners Q!!
[50] Conclusion
Adoption of this program along with knowledge , practices and techniques from the F. N. program (to come)
[51] Public acceptance
A challenge to AIA
[52] BREAK
[53] F.N Intro – training package
The Fly Neighbourly Program offers the technical information necessary for helicopter operators to fly both current and new advanced helicopters as quietly as practical, and to make helicopter operations compatible with nearly all land uses
What I’ll be running today – very American – just get past that – nothing better
[55] F.N Training Intro – Sources of noise
Produced by HAI Fly Neighbourly Committee (Matt Zuccaro) first in 1981
[56] F.N. Other factors - Manufacturers
[57] Silent Hawk
[58] F. N. pilot’s role – Individual noise abatement procedures
[60] Avoid area
Slide from F.N. Guide
Put this up to put some perspective on what we’re trying to do