1. JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
Paul Meehan and LauraWong
07/12/2016
2. Learning outcomes
»What are JR5 and JR2 reports?
»How the JUSP community uses these reports
»How the reports appear in JUSP
»Which publishers do we provide these reports for?
»“Real world” issues and case study
»Next steps – developing additional reports
07/12/2016 JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP 2
4. What is the JR5 report?
“Number of Successful Full-text Article Requests byYear
of Publication (YOP) and Journal”
Multiple entries possible for same journal, depending on
publication year for articles downloaded / viewed
e.g. in April 2016, “Nature” titles published in 2015 had 11 views,
whereas titles published in 2014 had 25 views.
Overall totals should match JR1
COUNTER definition
07/12/2016 JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP 4
5. How are libraries using the JR5?
» Evaluating current subscriptions and front file usage
» Evaluating archive or backfile purchases, subscriptions
and freely available content
»Looking at usage from a subject/discipline view – do
subjects have different downloading habits?
5
Journal Report 5 – usage by year of publication
07/12/2016 JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
10. What is the JR2 report?
“Access denied to full-text articles, by month and
journal”
Number of turnaways for each title and reason directly
from a selected publisher over a selected period of time
10
COUNTER definition
07/12/2016 JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
11. How are libraries using the JR2?
» Identifying and providing evidence for backfile purchases
» Identifying and providing evidence for substitutions
» Identifying and providing evidence for subscriptions
»Evaluating the potential value of publisher package offers
11
Journal Report 2 – access denials by month and year
07/12/2016 JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
14. JR2 in JUSP
14
The most common reason for
access denied is due to "content
item not licensed" and this is
specified under "MetricType" as
"no_license".
Other possible types are
"turnaway" due to
simultaneous/concurrent user
limit allowed by the licence, or
"other" for any other reasons.
07/12/2016 JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
15. Which publishers supply JR2/5 to JUSP?
» IEEE, Karger
15
Journal Report 2 only (2)
Journal Report 5 only (1)
» Annual Reviews
Reports date to Jan 2015 where available, others have been tested and don’t
currently conform to guidelines, some are “in progress”
Both reports (11)
» ACS, BioOne,CUP, Elsevier, Emerald, ICE, MIT, Nature, OUP, Springer,Wiley
07/12/2016 JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
16. Using reports in the real world …
16
Putting e-journal turnaway figures into context – Using the
COUNTER Journal Report 2 to make evidence-based decisions
Leon Perry,University of Portsmouth
http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/21_15.pdf
Raises some “real world” issues with regard to using the
JR2 reports and data
07/12/2016 JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
17. Using reports in the real world …
17
Report showed that 1 in 7 attempts to access articles resulted in
a turnaway, but the reasons were very varied. In some cases, titles
received 1,000 or more turnaways!
» Does Portsmouth have access to the titles?
» Are users trying to access direct publisher content or going via a different route?
» Uncertainty over discovery platform that should be used
» Helps inform purchasing decisions
› E.g. demand for older articles (can buy as one-off)
› No access to current content, could be due to deal available
› Titles changed platform or supplier
» Helps update local discovery service details / content
07/12/2016 JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
18. Next steps - JUSP
»Continue to add JR2/5 reports from JUSP publishers
»Work with publishers to resolve COUNTER / SUSHI issues
» Work with aggregators e.g. EBSCO, IngentaConnect
»Additional reports
› “JR2plus” and “JR5plus” type reports
› Annual summary reports – is this needed (no SCONUL
requirement)
»What wouldYOU like to see? Email jusp@jisc.ac.uk with your ideas
1807/12/2016 JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
19. “JR2 plus”
1907/12/2016 JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
Combines direct
publisher JR2 data with
data from gateways
and intermediaries
Sortable in usual ways