Report of Fund Office - Samy F. Gaiji
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•469 views
ISPC10
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to Report of Fund Office - Samy F. Gaiji
Similar to Report of Fund Office - Samy F. Gaiji (20)
More from Independent Science and Partnership Council of the CGIAR
More from Independent Science and Partnership Council of the CGIAR (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Report of Fund Office - Samy F. Gaiji
- 1. Reports of CGIAR System Units The Fund Office Jonathan Wadsworth Samy Gaiji
- 2. Content 1. CGIAR Fund Status 2. The Strategy & Results Framework 3. The CRP extensions
- 3. Content 1. CGIAR Fund Status 2. The Strategy & Results Framework 3. The CRP extensions
- 4. CGIAR Fund Status Fund Inflows and Outflows in $ million as of August 31 , 2014 Window 1 Window 2 Window 3 Provisional Total Received Confirmed Expected Received Confirmed Expected Received Confirmed Expected Received Confirmed Received Confirmed Expected Total Carryover balance 124.0 2.0 - 32.29 38.2 - 36.7 92.8 - 8.1 8.5 201.1 141.5 342.5 Receipts: (a) 2013 Contributions 1.5 (1.5) 38.2 (38.2) 74.6 (74.6) 8.5 (8.5) 122.7 (122.7) - - (b) 2014 Contributions 94.0 33.9 50.0 33.1 39.8 31.1 94.3 55.9 99.2 - - 221.4 129.6 180.3 531.3 (c) Transfers 15.6 (15.6) - - Total Inflows 219.5 34.5 50.0 103.5 39.8 31.1 221.2 74.1 99.2 1.0 0.0 545.2 148.4 180.3 873.9 Disbursements 2014. 1 (132.3) (74.4) (207.6) - (414.3) - - (414.3) Collection of CSP 5.1 (1.4) (3.7) - - - - Fund Balance 92.4 34.5 50.0 27.7 39.8 31.1 9.8 74.1 99.2 1.0 0.0 130.9 148.4 180.3 459.5 1 commitments for system costs of $0.6m
- 5. Inflows to the CGIAR Fund 2014 2013 0 2 18 63 72 123 130 219 155 154 190 151 155 195 245 184 402 427 516 514 514 517 554 559 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug US$ million Received Confirmed Projected 2013 11 23 33 80 85 120 153 221 237 237 228 200 230 213 180 130 514 527 505 520 519 527 531 531 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 - Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug US$ million Received Confirmed Projected 2014
- 6. Balance in the CGIAR Fund CY 2014 as of Aug 201 98 205 63 71 48 60 76 131 60 250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 Inflows Disbursements Balance CY 2013 as of Sept 181 136 88 99 121 104 121 93 77 130 250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 Inflows Disbursements Balance (in US$ million)
- 7. Window 1 & 2 Disbursement rate to CRPs (from inception to March 31, 2014) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% W1&2 Disbursement rate to CRP from inception to March 31, 2014 % of W1&2 approved budget disbursed % elapsed time
- 8. Content 1. CGIAR Fund Status 2. The Strategy & Results Framework 3. The CRP extensions
- 9. SRF Structure SRF Theory of Change + Intervention areas Implementation Results Framework Strategy Donors Doers
- 10. Theory of Change Working Groups Vision+Mission Priorities SLO1 SLO2 SLO3 Crosscutting
- 11. ‘Crosscutting’ = SLO enabling Programme SRF Planning Workshop proposals Gender Capacity Development NRM Climate Change Others? Big Data/Bioinformatics? Biodiversity? SLO
- 12. Setting priorities To what extent can donors set priorities? Target beneficiaries Relative importance of different geographic foci Relative importance of different System Level Outcomes The importance of partnerships Recognizing the dynamism of the 21st century Donor expectations of research proposals Relevance and effective contribution to SLOs & IDOs = Coherent Theory of Change Accountability with clear targets Science quality/Significance of the expected research outputs Coherent strategy for ‘crosscutting’ themes Governance, M&E, IPRs, Open Access etc.
- 13. Theory of Change
- 14. Example of Research Theme/Thrust CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE
- 15. Content 1. CGIAR Fund Status 2. The Strategy & Results Framework 3. The CRP extensions
- 16. Planning 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 CB FC ISPC CO ISPC CO CRP CRP
- 17. Final message: The importance of the ISPC recommendations for the FC High appreciation of the ISPC reviews by the FC The independent reviews of the ISPC are essential in the decision-making process (e.g. CRPs, SRF, Open Access etc.) The ISPC participation and commitment in various processes/meetings (e.g. SRF Planning Workshop) etc.
Editor's Notes
- Transitional slide
- Transitional slide
- In 2014, projected funding only come up to $531 million compared to $652m in 2013. The decrease of about $120m is an artificial decrease due to the following: One time additional contribution from Canada of $20m for CRP 4 in 2013 One time additional contribution from Japan of $9 million for AfricaRice in 2013 One time additional contribution from Sweden of $22 million for CRPs in 2013 An advance remittance of GBP10million ($16m) from UK 2014 contribution received by the Fund in 2013 Additional USAID mission funding of $36 million in 2013
- Message: The Fund is better able to plan the disbursement due to more confirmed funding early in the year compared to 2013. Thanks to multi year agreements signed by: Australia, Belgium, the Bill & Melinda Gates Fdn, Denmark, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom
- Message: More 2013 contributions were paid in early 2014 compared to 2012 contributions paid in early 2013. Even though we have confirmed contributions in the projections, it can not be paid early enough to enable early CRP disbursements to CRPs due to Financial and CRP progress reports which were not submitted until July of the current year The report illustrates more payment made in August 2013 while the majority of quarterly disbursement for 2014 will happen in Sept. Not a big difference.
- The report is only up to March 31, 2014 because there are not Window 1 and 2 payments from April to August. The chart illustrate the percent of W1&2 budget disbursed to the CRPs compared to the elapsed time in the implementation period.
- Transitional slide
- NOT SURE ABOUT THIS ONE… It may be confusing for the audience…
- Using CSA as an opportunity to address the CCAFS concerns. RED = High investment ORANGE= Medium YELLOW = Low
- Transitional slide
- Transitional slide