Discrimination Debate: Should Women Serve in Combat Roles

An Argument Essay About Discrimination
Argument Essay
Some may say discrimination in America is a thing in the past, but is this a true statement? Are men
and women always seen and treated as equals in our new and reformed nation? I am sure there are
many debates out there proving or disproving this potential issue, but one in particular has caught
my eye. Our military is made up of many different sections, and the men and women who were
brave enough to raise their right hand and enlist in the service were given a skill to master
resulting in a job to perform up to the highest standard. The military has many job offerings, ranging
from supply specialist, which would be someone doing paper work and giving the other soldiers
what they need to get their job done, all the way to infantry, those who are trained to engage, fight,
and defeat the enemy in combat. Both men and women are authorized to enlist in the service, but
both are not allowed to train in all job positions.
It is no secret that when high controversy topics arise in the media, people have their personal
opinions, each one believing they are "right." Is there always a "right" or "wrong" answer, or can
the morally correct answer be a combination of both sides of the argument? Should women be
allowed to earn an infantry job in the military? When questioning those concerned with this topic the
answers will be mixed with yes and no, each having their own opinions to back up their argument. If
a woman wants and is able to perform to the training
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Examples Of Valid Arguments
1.A valid argument is an argument which has a conclusion that follows its premises. The premises
can be true or false. When one or both premises are false it is possible that the argument seems
completely valid, but it has false conclusion. An example for a valid argument which has a false
premise is:
Permise1: If dog can fly.
Permise2: Terrier is a kind of dog
Conclusion: terrier can fly
(Here the argument is valid, but the first premise is false, and makes the argument unsound.
A valid argument can have true premises which lead to a true conclusion as well. For example:
Permise1: Human needs water to stay alive.
Permise2: John is human.
Conclusion: John needs water to stay alive.
This kind of argument is valid and sound because it has...show more content...
Aristotle argues that practice virtues, and learning from virtuous people enable us to flourish. To
become a good person, we must practice virtuous acts regularly. Gradually, these acts become our
habits. Good habits and moral virtues are the principle to have a good and happy life. Virtuous
people train us how to be more virtuous. Aristotle explains that if we want to achieve moral
excellence, we need to practice the virtues. Moreover, we need virtues friends, and a moral exemplar
to imitate them to improve our virtues. As we develop our moral behavior, we gradually will find
more happiness in our lives. Although Aristotle admits that health, success, and money play an
important role to make a person happy, he argues that the virtues are the most important factors that
determine one is truly happy or not. So, just thinking of virtues is not

Argumentative Essay On Empathy
Empathy is the ability to understand and experience the feelings of others, particularly others'
suffering. Humanity's gift of understanding complex emotions ushers in a new way of understanding
ourselves and how we react to stimuli. This ultimately leads to questioning of everything, leading us
to one strong notion: Does empathy guide or hinder moral action? One common misconception
while considering empathetic influence is how it compares with sympathy. The two are a
dichotomy, and must be differentiated. To sympathize is to feel sorry for someone, therefore making
the victim suffer even more. Empathy empowers the victim, allowing company to play a role in how
humans naturally interact with one another to bond and heal. With the...show more content...
Furthermore, during empathizing, emotional reaction in the observer correlates with the fact that
connections between the person's mental state and his or her behavior are not always governed by
lawful conduct of emotion. The response to the other person's mental state creates a gap between
systemizing and empathizing, for without empathetic response, one could only have a very small or
inaccurate reading of a person's emotion. The systemizer only expects that the person's mental state
will at least constrain their behavior. The level of empathy one has is greatly affected by how
systematic they are.
Now, taking into account the SQ/EQ, we can determine how individuals would respond to regular
situations. The response to stimuli is heavily weighted on self and our own experiences – as we are a
product of our environment. However, fifty percent of one's own personality is determined
genetically, within one's very own alleles. This is why people act so much like their parents.
Mothers can actually pass down a gene to their sons that makes them dangerously unempathetic. This
exact gene is what causes more men than women to become serial killers. In addition to the basis of
human structure, men also have a higher tendency to be aggressive, rendering most empathetic
responses null, and barely thought about. Since males are more likely to be systemizers, their

Argumentative Essay On Drunk Driving
Drunk Driving Drunk driving is a dangerous problem that needs to be addressed in our society,
not only to cut back on the number of deaths caused by alcohol related accidents but also to
ensure safety on public roads. Drunk driving is deliberately breaking the law, as well as a sign of
indifference for other drivers. People that tend to go out for a few drinks often drink too much
and still feel the need to drive themselves home. Thinking they are sober enough to tackle the
drive home, sadly many people accept the challenge. People go out on the road, not knowing that
they are endangering other drivers as well as themselves. Others do not trust people to drive them
around so they would rather take the risk. Peoples' prides are too high as well. Some cannot admit
their drunk because they are afraid that they would appear as a weak person. Some risk taking
their own lives, or worse, killing someone else instead of being ridiculed or made fun of.
Surprisingly enough, people even think it is funny and cool to drive while drunk. Some teenagers
think of it as some form of competition to see who can drive better while intoxicated. Some make
the ridiculous statement, "I drive better drunk than sober." This is not always the case. "Alcohol can
decrease the ability to judge car position as all as affecting night vision and color perception" (Hall).
It is never ok to drive while drunk because you can mistakenly drive off the road as well as cause a
fatal accident.
Peer pressure is another reason why people drive while drunk. Some teens submit to peer pressure
because they would rather fit in and be liked instead of seem like an outcast. Peer pressure can be
a good thing as well. Some people have had to tell their friends before that they should not drive
while intoxicated. Believe it or not, positive peer pressure can also encourage others not to make
bad decisions. Those who succumb to negative peer pressure always end up in some kind of
accident or trouble with the law. The aftermath of a car crash may be more than a loved one can
bare. People tend to feel differently about this if someone they loved were to be killed or injured by
a drunk driver. Travis Grayson killed a 6–year–old girl

Argument Essay Example University
As higher education is becoming more and more expensive for students to attend college, it is
making it harder for students of different backgrounds, especially low–income and middle–income
families, to hold a degree beyond a high school level. Many colleges are not taking the initiative to
take care of these students and are preventing these individuals from growing and climbing the
socioeconomic ladder. Thus, it is imperative for a university to create opportunities for students of all
backgrounds to have a chance of gaining a college degree because there are many benefits to
furthering their education. At Example University, we will be the ones creating change towards our
current state of education.
Located at the heart of Philadelphia, Example University is a place where students will reach their
fullest potential and a place where we will fulfill their desires to learn and...show more content...
Students have hundreds of undergraduate degrees that they can explore from. Through each
program, they will become experts in the fields they wish to pursue. In addition, students have
hundreds of clubs and organizations that they can join to make connections because as a university,
we see the importance of creating well–rounded students. In addition, we seek to educate our
students by providing them a foundation of broad disciplinaries and enforcing practices that will
help them succeed in school and in the workforce. Furthermore, we pride ourselves on turning our
students into future leaders for their communities and for the nation as a whole. We believe that our
job is to foster the growth of each individual student and to help students constantly learn each and
every day while accounting for their own unique lives and goals. Thus, our ultimate mission is to
allow our students to reach their fullest potential as soon as they enter our

Argumentative Essay On Climate Change
Climate change can be traced down to since the mid–1800s, when the industrial revolution first
started taking place all around the world. Lives of human and animal species have been negatively
affected since then, with events such as natural disasters, the melting of ice in polar regions, and
change in weather and living conditions. Climate change in polar regions, in particular, has faced
the most damage compared to any other region because of its location in regard to the sun. Climate
change holds many different views and opinions about the effects, and even the existence itself, but
evidence is clear and unmistakable in global ramifications and local impact in polar regions.
"...Climate change [is] the 'greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people'", skeptics like
Senator Inhofe of Oklahoma like to say. Climate change is change in climate patterns due to an
increase in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases produced by certain human activity.
According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center, data taken by satellite has shown that the
Arctic cover has decreased by 30% over the past 30 years, and this change, which also include
change in sea ice and permafrost, in artic weather and climate is caused by humans. Although
numerous scientists have confirmed the legitimacy of climate change, there are different views on
whether climate change is real or not. Government officials like Senator Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma or
Senator Marco Rubio of Florida have explicitly stated that they do not believe climate change is
neither real, nor caused by humans (Tom McCarthy, 2014). On the other hand, mainstream media
and other media outlets, such as The Independent and The Economist, have reported their findings
of climate change and its legitimacy. The Independent (Conner, S. 2011) reported that records of
these changes were taken by military submarines, land measurements, and satellite data to prove ice
in polar regions are melting faster and faster. Satellites have tracked sea ice since the 1970s and by
nuclear submarines since the Cold War,
according to Peter Wadhams of Cambridge University and it was predicted that by September
2015, there would be no more sea ice. (Conner, S. 2011). Luckily, sea ice has not

Argument Essay On Equality
Equality Argument Essay "THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal." these are
the first words read in the short story, "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut. The story is about
a future where everyone in the world is, "not only equal in front of God and the law", but also
equal in every which way, like knowledge and looks and physical ability. In the story, a couple is
watching tv and witness their arrested son break into a ballet and dance a wonderful dance only to
be shot dead by the handicapper general herself. That leaves a question, what the reader can easily
tell from the story is that the author believes that equality is a bad thing. To end, I believe that
equality is not what we should need one hundred percent but give everyone an equal chance and see
where they take it.
To start, why would equality be so bad? From the first view, equality sounds like a good thing.
Everyone gets equal treatment, pay, etc. But what about when a serial killer gets the same
treatment a veterinarian. How fair would it be for someone who saves animals lives to be treated
the same publically as someone who's murdered, multiple people? After seeing this, equality can
seem fairly split, but there's also a difference, there's equality then there's equity. Equality would be
people treated equal, especially socially and equal opportunities, while equity is definite fairness.
That means people brought down or up to meet the same level. What I believe was exhibited in the
story "Harrison Bergeron", was not equality, but actually equity. This can be seen by them bringing
people down from their abilities or up to meet a standard to make everyone equal. As the story
states, "A little mental handicap radio in his ear. He was required by law to wear it at all times",
that means they are bringing some people down to the same level but at the same time not bringing
people up to that level. "Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else", the idea of this, in
theory, seems clever. Everyone equal in every single way, even mentally. But the more the reader
may think of it, they see little holes. There's no drive to get better, no devotion to beat something,
there's just what it is and the reader can't do anything to get

Example Of An Argument
ii) What is an argument? Elaborate with examples. In everyday life, people use argument to
connote a squabble between people. But in critical thinking and logic, an argument is a list of
statements, which consist of two or more premises or assumptions and a conclusion of the
argument. To accord an argument is to provide a set of premises as reasons for giving credence to
the conclusion and not necessarily to attack or criticise someone. Arguments can also be a tool to
underpin other people's opinions.
Here is an example of an argument:
If you want to find a good job, you should study smart
You do want a good job
So, you should study smart.
The first two sentences are the premises of the argument and the final sentence is the conclusion. To
...show more content...
Therefore, the patient does not have malaria.
Referring back to the criteria that has to be fulfilling to produce a valid argument, the given
example obeys the criteria with a true premise which leads to a true conclusion. This is how a valid
argument is identified. For valid arguments, the addition of extra premises will not change the
conclusion. A valid conclusion is deduced from a set of premises can never be changed by the
addition of new premises.
b)Invalid arguments
If an argument is invalid, then it is possible for a false conclusion even though all the premises are
true. It is logically possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.
Here is an example of an invalid argument:
All actors are robots
Johny Dep is a robot.
Therefore, Johny Dep is an actor.
Now, if these premises are true, it does not follow that Johny Dep is an actor. It would follow if we
mention that only actors are robots in the premises, but it does not say that. We can assume that
anyone in the acting ccupation is a robot, but robots might be doing different jobs besides acting.
So, the fact that Johny Dep is a robot does not guarantee that he is also an

Argumentative Essay On Organ Donation
The medical industry had been achieving more in the stage of medical advancements, though they
are still in the early phase. Artificial organs have been one of those achievements. Although they
have achieved such, artificial organs are not perfect. Most doctors as well as patients would prefer
to replace a dying organ with a compatible human organ, rather than with an artificial or animal
organ. Yet due to a there being less organs donated than recipients, artificial and animal organs are
becoming more common in transplants. Most of this issue is because people are unaware of how
organ donation works, the organs that can be donated, how many people are in need, and the
advancements that have happened in the field. Organ donation saves hundreds of lives every year,
but many lives are recklessly lost due to a shortage of organ donors.
Organ donation is the medical process of voluntarily giving one or more of your organs to
someone in need, whether it be someone you know or a stranger. It is strictly voluntary, no
payment for the organ/s will be given from the hospital, the recipient or the recipients family. In
organ donation, there are two types of donations, living organ donation and deceased organ
donation. Living organ donation is when the donor is still alive and voluntarily chooses to donate
one or more of their organs to a recipient(s) in need. Whereas, deceased organ donation happens
after the donor has passed away, and consent was given to be able to donate their organs.
In living organ donation, before a donor can donate there are tests administrated to see if the donor is
suitable to donate. There is an evaluation of the donor done to make sure that no physical,
psychological, or emotional harm will happen to them before, during, or after donating
(Organdonor.gov U.S. Government Information on Organ Donation and Transplantation). In living
organ donation, most donations happen within family members, or between close friends, although
there are stranger donations that happen. Living organ donors should generally be physically fit, in
good health, and between the ages of 18 to 60. They should not have a history or have diabetes,
cancer, high blood pressure, kidney disease, or heart disease

Argumentative Essay On Failure
Failure is not a complicated idea. It is a vague idea, so the only thing complicated about it is
defining it. People tend to over simplify the idea. Some say that failure is only a setback to a goal.
Some stress the importance of embracing a failure, but fail to explain what that actually means.
Others still believe that failure should be feared and avoided at all costs
In my view, failure cannot be considered a setback. I think of it as more of a sign that one path
wasn't exactly the right one to achieve their goal. Imagine a motionless man who watched as a
train zipped by him. But from the reference point of another man who was on the train, the man
moved backwards. The problem with life is that it has as much motion as the train, but is invisible
to the human eye. If someone doesn't go towards where they want to be in life, life will pass them
by with no sympathy. Everyone agrees that life is in motion, but no one knows where it's going. It
moves in the simplest way that something can move, forward, but in no specific direction. In that
sense, failure could never set anyone back, but only change their course. Everyone who has passion
about what they're doing will think that they're doing the most to make themselves content, but
things don't always work out according to plan. Failure doesn't close off all opportunity, it opens up
a new way of doing thing with the experience of what went wrong in the past.
I was always very confused by people who think failure needs to be

Argumentative Essay On Privacy
Prasanna Kumar Bezavada
Online English 3000(Section–07)
Patricia Raburn
29–10–17
Privacy++
"The only truly secure system is one that is powered off, cast in a block of concrete and sealed in a
lead–lined room with armed guards."(Spafford). The word privacy has become a buzz word in the
current decade compared to how it used to be talked about in the last decade. As we all are aware
of the recent happenings around the world with regards to privacy, we all should be worried that
nothing is safe in the times we are living in, as every bit of information is getting snatched
somehow or the other through different channels. This information can be something that is related
to our personal, family or professional life. I believe that individual privacy outweighs money or
anything at this moment in the world right now. If we lose money or property, we can regain it
somehow, but if we lose our personal information to someone or an agency, it's challenging to get it
back before it gets misused.
Danial J. Solove is an eminent author and a law professor at University of George Washington law
school. Dr. Solove introduces the article why privacy matters if you have "Nothing to Hide" in an
interesting way that, In his introduction of the eassy, he puts a valid question to the audience
regarding their current privacy standards. He starts off this article by presenting the views of
various people on the most debated topic around the world at present which is "Nothing to Hide."
All throughout the article, Solove tries to make an argument both in a positive and negative tone. He
also supports his arguments with so many valid examples that, it makes you wonder, which side of
the coin he stands.
Firstly, after seeing the collective inferences made by the people in the initial paragraphs of the
article, Solove explains us in which form should we look at the argument "Nothing to Hide." If we
extremely see the argument, for example, If a person says he has nothing to hide, another person
comes and means, since you have nothing to hide can I take a nude picture of yours and show it to
everyone which is an extreme form of taking that argument. Dr.Solove feels that taking an argument
in an exaggerated form isn't a good thing because

Argumentative Essay On Renewable Energy
Renewability
For nearly everyone on earth, fossil fuels are a part of our daily lives. Some of the more obvious
places to find petroleum products would be gas and diesel in cars and trucks, but it is in more than
just your tank. Without fossil fuels, we would not have things such as plastic to make a wide
variety of things such as tires, kayaks, or even computers. The question remains, do we need fossil
fuels?
In this day and age, we have new energy sources that could be used to power our homes and
transportation. Wind and solar power are used all over the world, but are still used far less than
fossil fuels. Most would say it's not reliable or it doesn't make any profit. While both statements are
true, it doesn't mean we can't make a better future using renewable energy. In fact, the only reason
we don't use renewables for everything is that we don't want to change. The hard truth is we need to
change. Fossil fuels are great right now, but if we run out, humanity must have another source of
energy.
Renewable energy may seem like a daunting task, but the benefits to humanity could be incredible.
Public uses of renewable energy range from transportation all the way to heating and cooling.
Everything we use could become less explosive and less expensive. Cities with a high concentration
of people could become safer and healthier places to live. Transportation could be converted to
electricity dramatically, improving smog conditions. Global warming may or may not

Argumentative Essay On Memorials
Memorializing events in the history of the world for any purpose has it's positives as well as the
negatives. Ranging from a memorial of a popular United States president from a loved one of a
family, memorials have generally served as a purpose of remembrance from the past of said event.
The purpose of the memorial is usually associated with a positive, uplifting feeling towards the
deceased individual or past event. While this is more or less simply defining what memorials are
for, what is the meaning behind them? What purpose do they serve besides the simplicity that they
are? Important messages from a few varied sources will give a differing viewpoint on memorials
from one to another. The first thought of memorials is the simple, generic...show more content...
Memorials are meant to be striking in the sense that you will notice said memorial and donate some
attention to it. The views of these see this attention capturing as exceedingly high for some purposes.
Some memorials are outstanding in their craftsmanship and aesthetics. This makes people wonder
what could be lurking inside the memorial, or what is near that memorial. What we've got here is a
formula, striking looks of the monument is almost guaranteed to attract some form of attention.
According to Source G, the analogy of tainting the planet with specific memorials are ridiculous, "I
imagined taking a knife and cutting into the earth, opening it up, an initial violence and pain that in
time would heal. The grass would grow back, but the initial cut would remain a pure flat surface in
the earth with a polished, mirrored surface, much like the surface on a geode when you cut it and
polish the edge. The need for the names to be on the memorial would become the memorial; there
was no need to embellish the design further. The people and their names would allow everyone to
respond and remember. The ideals of such nonsensical placements of the memorials are just irritable
at the

This material set–off in this fashion in the handout identifies the revision notation for these matters.
Guidelines for the Argumentative/Persuasive Essay
Citing Sources
You are not to employ footnotes or endnotes in your essay. Rather, when you employ another's ideas
or quote from a source in your essay, please employ the Modern Language Association, "MLA,"
format for in–text citations; the format is set forth in Keys, p. 144 et seq.
Quoting, Citing, and Referencing Source Material
Please also review the material on summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting material set forth in Keys,
p. 122–25.
Works Cited Page
Given that your essays will contain references to sources that were employed in constructing the
arguments in...show more content...
Con Argument
1.First Con Argument Paragraph: Precis
Summarize the con argument and cite to its expert source with credentials
2.Second Con Argument Paragraph: Example of the Con Argument
3.Third Con Argument: Refutation
Discredit the reliability of the con argument or demonstrate that it is in appositive or irrelevant to the
topic by challenging its source, timeliness, authorship, or logic. For additional information, please
review the Refutation Handout available under Course Documents. C. First Pro Argument
1.First Pro Argument Paragraph: Precis
Summarize the first pro argument and provide its expert source with credentials.
2.Second Pro Argument Paragraph: Example of the Pro Argument
3.Third Pro Argument Paragraph
Establish the reliability of the argument by employing one or more of the seven types of evidence
discussed in Bedford, p. 518.
D.Analogy Paragraph: See the Analogy Handout available under Course
Documents for additional information
E.Most Compelling Reason to View the Pro Position as the Superior Position on the Topic
Paragraph Based upon Belief, Value, Social Mores, or Tradition. For additional information, please
review the Most Compelling Reason Handout available on Blackboard. III.Conclusion A. First
Conclusion Paragraph
1. Summarize the essay in a one to two–sentence "restatement"
2.Either discussion of the greater implication of the

Rhetoric and Argument Essays
ENG122: Composition II An Introduction to Argument English 122: Composition II An Introduction
to Argument Argument and Rhetoric An argument can take many forms. It is, at its root, a method
for communicating a singular position with evidence, logic, and persuasion. There are essential
elements to all valid arguments, though they may take different forms. 1. Claim 2. Evidence 3.
Counterargument 4. Rebuttal A successful argument depends upon the delicate balance between
these elements. Imagine a teeter–totter at the playground. The claim is the basis of the argument,
much like the base of the teeter–totter. A big opposing viewpoint, called the counterargument, is
constantly pushing down on one side or the other. Balance can only be...show more content...
Section One: Introduction and Thesis–Your introduction should describe the rhetorical situation and
give a clear forecast of the material you will cover in your essay. Your thesis statement should
make a clear, limited, descriptive assertion and explain why your stance matters. Example: Failure
to pass the recent gun law is a bad move for public safety because inexperienced, mentally ill, and
unethical people will continue to have access to firearms. Section Two: Present the position that you
most agree with. Then, give ample evidence to support why you hold this view. (Do not use
first–person. Use third–person narrative). Section Three: Present the position that you most disagree
with. Then, validate the perspective with a circumstance or situation in which that viewpoint could
or might be correct. Section Four: While remaining non–offensive in language and style, provide a
rebuttal of the opposition's stance by pointing out its fallacies or lack of logos and ethos. Section
Five: Conclusion–Provide a sound but brief explanation of your argument and further direction for
your reader. Page |2 ENG122: Composition II An Introduction to Argument Consensual (Rogerian)
Argument The consensual or Rogerian method is based on the

Argumentative Essay On Refugees
Refugee Argument What do you think about refugees entering our country? Do you think that they
should have rights the same as us? How do you think refugees help are U.S economy? Do you
think they can us helpful information to keep this country safe? Giving rights and opportunities to
everyone is what the U.S is what should be known for. Imagine you're a refugee and you're
hopeless what would you think? You're fighting to get rights, you're trying your best to pay your
bills and being the best citizen you can be, but your experiences from your past life keep haunting
you. You're just trying to start over just trying to be like the rest. But still getting disrespected by
your peers. The United States Should accept refugees giving them equal rights. They can give us
helpful information, help the U.S economy. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a
declaration adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948, in Paris,
France. It was written shortly after World War II. The atrocities committed by Nazi Germany
during the Holocaust shocked the world. It pushed countries to develop a set of standards and
protections on how to treat their fellow humans. It declares that human rights are given to all
people, no matter who they are or where they live according to Universal Declaration of Human
Rights. Meaning everyone of any race, color, gender, language, religion, national or social origin,
property or birth should have the rights and freedoms in this country. Therefore, people belonging
to any country with different kinds of governments will have these rights and freedoms. Refugees
should be respected to have rights and the same respect we get as Americans. As America, we are
known for having rights for everyone. When refugees are coming here they are coming here for a
new beginning, their home country might be in war. Or they just need new opportunities and are
getting no respect. Refugees should not get disrespected from Americans because they're just trying
to get opportunities. Refugees can offer a lot to our economy. People think refugees are considered
an economic burden for the countries

Classical Argument
Mainly college students and instructors are my audience. In addition, this semester I have a tutor,
who is also a part of my audience. For this discussion, my audience needs to know there are options
for financial aid available or should be available for both traditional and nontraditional students. My
audience favors scholarships and grants, over subsidized and unsubsidized loans from the federal
government. This set of critical readers definitely value reliable, solid content with reputable sources
over the author's opinion concerning grant reform. The most important aspect to my audience would
be the decisions on what to include in the final draft for this classical argument. The organization of
the ideas is essential to best support

Argumentative Essay On Poverty
Thousands of individuals are living in poverty. Why is it that this worldwide dilemma is still
rising in rapid numbers till this day? Is it because of a lack of authoritative power, or a lack of
one's self control to do good? Despite the unknown cause, it has managed to drastically affect the
lives of many. Poverty is like a curse, one that is wrongfully placed, difficult to get out of, and
resistant to many forms of help. The pinpoint cause of poverty is challenging to find. People who
live well off and are above the poverty line may be quick to assume that laziness, addiction, and
the typical stereotypes are the causes of poverty. Barbara Ehrenreich, a well known writer on
social issues, brings attention to the stereotypical ideology at her time, that "poverty was caused,
not by low wages or a lack of jobs, but by bad attitudes and faulty lifestyles" (17). Ehrenreich is
emphasizing the fact that statements like the one listed, often influence readers to paint
inaccurate mental pictures of poverty that continue to shine light on the ideology of stereotypes
being the pinpoint cause to poverty. However, there are many other causes that are often
overshadowed, leaving some individuals to believe that poverty was wrongfully placed upon
them. Examples would include: high rates of unemployment, low paying jobs, race, and health
complications. Which are all out of one's ability to control. There is no control over a lack of jobs
and high rates of unemployment, nor the amount of inadequate wages the working poor receive.
Greg Kaufmann, an advisor for the Economic Hardship Reporting Project and The Half in Ten
campaign, complicates matters further when he writes, "Jobs in the U.S. [were] paying less than
$34,000 a year: 50 percent. Jobs in the U.S. [were] paying below the poverty line for a family of
four, less than $23,000 annually: 25 percent" (33). Acknowledging Kaufmann's fact, the amount
received for a family of four is fairly close to the yearly salary of a high school graduate, which
means, receiving that kind of pay for one man may seem challenging, now imagine caring for the
needs of four individuals. To make matters worse, certain families receive that amount of money and
carry the burden of paying for

What Makes An Effective Argument Ineffective?
1.The basic parts of an effective argument are a stated clearly defined issue, makes a claim, and
offers support for that claim. Sometimes an argument may also recognize opposing viewpoints and
incorporate them into the argument
2.What makes an argument ineffective is when using emotional appeals to distract a reader from a
lack of evidence. Also the use of faulty reasoning, and inaccurate facts.
3.An issue is a problem, controversy, or an idea that people can have different viewpoints about.
The term claim is a point in which a writer is trying to prove. This is typically the writer's viewpoint
on the issue. A refutation is recognizing and auguring against opposing viewpoints.
4.A claim of value focuses on an opinion or judgment about

Discrimination Debate: Should Women Serve in Combat Roles

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Help Me Write An Essay Port Saint Lucie

More from Help Me Write An Essay Port Saint Lucie (16)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Discrimination Debate: Should Women Serve in Combat Roles