1. Library Instruction Outside the Class
The Rocky Road to the Flipped
Classroom: A Case Study of an
“Independent” Library Instruction
Gergana Kostova
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
November 14, 2014
2. Library Instruction & Course Redesign
• ENGL 100 Composition at UMBC
25+ sections (Fall) – 14+ sections (Spring)
1 librarian
• Course Pilot in Fall 2012
• Library component outside of class time
• Methods: flipped classroom, blended learning
3. Library Instruction & Redesign
of ENGL 100 Composition Cont.
• Library instruction outside of class time
• Blackboard module: Library assignment
• 30 min. library workshops: Active learning
exercise
• Information literacy training to the Writing
Fellows
4. Objectives
Students should be able to:
• Understand the iterative nature of the research
process
• Formulate research questions related to
information needs
• Utilize available research tools and their
features
• Identify various resources’ formats and their
relevancy to the research project.
• Identify the options for help
5. Librarian’s Roles
1. Online
Instructor
Module for Online
Learning
Tutorials Quiz
3. Trainer of the
Writing Fellows
(TAs)
Provide
Information that
TAs Can Teach to
Students
2. Instructor
Outside of Class
Time
Office Hours and
Consultations
Active Learning
During the
Workshop
7. Workshop Exercise Embedded in
English Subject Guide
Google Form
1. Specify the research
question
2. Select the keywords
3. Find a recent peer-reviewed
article and
cite it
4. Find a relevant book in
the catalog, its call
number and check for
book availability/ check
out
5. Where to create ILL
account + create it
8. Redesigned Library Instruction for ENGL 100
2012-2013
• Fall 2012 - Pilot project
4 sections - 5 workshops
• Spring 2013 – Full course
18 sections – 28 workshops
9. Quiz - Exercise Scores Correlation
Two Sections Sample - Spring 2013
• 91% of students took the quiz, and 65% of students attended the library workshops
• Students with quiz scores 70 and under had problems with formulating the research
question and keywords.
10. Points Considered in Summer 2013
• Tutorials familiarize with research resources
• Different skill levels: some students need
more time for hands-on exercise
• Focus on active learning exercise
• No-show cases
11. ENGL 100 Library Component
Fall 2013 – Spring 2014
• Pre-workshop quiz graded
• Workshop attendance recommended
• Focus on students who need more help
• Students with better skills work independently
Result: better interaction with lower attendance
12. Library Instruction in Fall 2014
• Tutorials and quiz with new active learning
questions
• 40 min workshops for all students; required for
those with quiz score 70 or
• Communication with:
• Instructors
• writing fellows
• students
• In-person and virtual consultations
14. 100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Quiz - Exercise Score Correlation Fall 2014
Sample: Attendees in two workshops
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
Quiz max score 100/Exercise max score 50
Quiz score Exercise score
82% of students with quiz score 70 or below found relevant resources
during the workshop exercise.
15. Conclusion
• It is a work in progress
• Not ideal but getting better with attendance
and quality of interactions
• Constant communication with instructors and
writing fellows
• Considering new ideas to meet the goals
Editor's Notes
Pilot was fine – all student worked on Blackboard module and came to the sessions;
In Spring 2013: We had very ambitious number of sessions; some not fully attended; I was flexible to address dynamic situation and rapidly adjusted to changing conditions; some sessions were canceled and some students redirected; also: late comers to the workshop - couldn’t finish in time; I always communicated workshop registration numbers with instructors.
Quiz results and the workshop exercise of students in two sections of ENGL 100 were analyzed to see the correlation between them.
91% students took the quiz, and 60% students attended the library workshops.
Students who scored 80-100 in the library quiz found relevant and credible resources during the hands-on time.
Students with scores 70 and below did have problems with keywords and formulating the research question too – need special attention!
New active learning questions: (example: two articles titles: to find them and see what kind of articles are they: scholarly or popular.)
Communication with instructors and writing fellows (TAs) to remind students for the quiz and workshops; and inform about attendance. Some instructors give students extra credit for attending the library workshop
Communication with students to register and attend the sessions;
I review the quiz results to see what I should focus on;
Also, in-person and online consultations for assistance with assignments
Better quality of sessions: student centered
More time to take questions; discussion and exercise
Focus on important concepts and search tips:
Keywords and Use of discovery tool filters
Talk more about Peer reviewed vs popular articles
Talk more about resource evaluation
Significantly more students with score 70 or below attend the sessions! 82% of them were able to find relevant resources during the workshop exercise. Obviously the interaction during the workshop had a very positive impact on their understanding.
Students with higher score attend the workshop to learn more about library research.