• There is a new bull market in doomsayers predicting a market crash
• Low volatility is partly structural and we have witnessed similarly extended periods without corrections before
• Waiting for corrections is a futile and opportunistically expensive exercise
• We would not throw in the towel on Trump as midterm elections are looming and the GOP needs some success stories
• Equities are entering a slower period of year and hedging some exposure is advised
Monthly Viewpoint from our CIO, Marco Pabst - August 2017: "Aging Bulls"
1. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 1
Aging bulls
“Democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the people by the people for the people.” Oscar Wilde
Summary
There is a new bull market in doomsayers predicting a market crash
Low volatility is partly structural and we have witnessed similarly extended periods without corrections before
Waiting for corrections is a futile and opportunistically expensive exercise
We would not throw in the towel on Trump as midterm elections are looming and the GOP needs some success stories
Equities are entering a slower period of year and hedging some exposure is advised
World equity markets just finished nine months in a row in positive
territory and this despite or rather because of a significantly weaker
dollar and a dysfunctional Trump administration. Who said, a large
company needs a management team to run it? The US would not
be the first country doing alright without a functioning government.
The current bull market is the second-longest in modern history,
having now lasted more than 3,000 days, bested only by the almost
epic 1987-2000 advance. The post-war recovery market rally from
1949 to 1956 came close, lasting just over 2,600 days.
As a result of this year’s move, and some other factors, volatility has
collapsed to relatively low levels and headline valuation numbers for
many markets are on the high side compared to history.
The boredom and monotony that sometimes comes with steadily
advancing bull markets in combination with the slow summer
months must have hit a nerve in the community of market
commentators and PR-savvy fund managers. I cannot come up with another reason for why there is suddenly such a rush of dire
crash warnings seemingly coming out of every direction. Whilst they need between one and 27 pages to explain the rationale,
they all sum up in one line: The market is expensive and interest rates are too low and, therefore, equities are about to collapse
shortly.
Exhibit 1: Performance of different asset classes in 2017
Source(s): ACPI, Bloomberg
2. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 2
As if most market participants ever cared about valuation levels whereby a magic gravitational force would always pull stocks
back to some fair level.
Do not get me wrong, we are not saying that markets are cheap and one should jump into stocks with no questions asked and
we are certainly not overexposed to equities at this stage. However, markets are also not completely irrational all the time. So
one has to ask why we are trading at these levels and not why the market is about the fall. After all, timing markets or trying to
call tops is a pretty futile exercise that has already damaged many managers’ reputations. However, this does not stop people
from trying.
Exhibit 2: A selection of crash warnings from just one week
Source(s): ACPI
In each case, the rationale is sound and makes a lot of sense to us and we would probably agree to most of the issues raised.
However, bull markets and economic booms do not die of old age. For them to end it requires at least one of two ingredients:
central banks overdoing monetary tightening (or markets not being prepared for it) or an outright asset bubble was being burst
by a catalyst. All severe market dislocations can be explained by this. The 1987 crash happened in the context of quickly
accelerating inflation (from low levels) and the Fed beginning to raise rates in short order, on the back of a market rally of
~80% in less than two years as Reaganomics finally began to work (“Government's view of the economy could be summed up
in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.”, R. Reagan). What
started as a small correction ended in a crash as recently-invented portfolio insurance accelerated the downside decline. The
modern day equivalent to this is the concept of value at risk (VaR) but this is for another letter.
The 2000/2001 correction was slightly more complex as broader markets were initially not too affected by the decline in tech
stocks. The initial crash happened clearly in one particular, extremely overvalued area in the market whereby the catalyst was
3. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 3
the publication of Barron’s cash burn list. The decline in the wider stock market then accelerated and was extended as a result
of the Sept 11 attacks in New York.
What is now known as the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008, originated in the US real estate sector where a massive
bubble of essentially worthless securities was created that threatened to bring down the financial sector. What tipped the
lowest end of the property sector over the edge causing a chain reaction was the oil price that climbed past USD140 and
caused significant problems for consumers.
Exhibit 3: Underwater perspective for the US market since 1928 (duration of the market trading below the last high
water mark)
Source(s): ACPI
As can be seen in the underwater chart above, the last two crashes were rather quite extreme in the history of markets.
Corrections of 10-20% are far more normal and more frequent but much less damaging. I continue to believe that a repeat of
2000 or 2008 is far into the future despite many still feeling the muscle memory of these two events and thus driving their
perceptions and creating in effect an anchoring bias.
Moving forward to today, central banks have learnt their lessons and are uber-shy to tighten too quickly although, in our
opinion, they would probably get away with somewhat higher rates in the current robust environment. So, this factor is not
posing too much of a threat at this point which leaves us with bubbles and catalysts to prick them. As for the former, there is
no real definition of what a bubble is other than the realisation in hindsight but to be meaningful, a mere 20-25% overvaluation
compared to historic norms, and this is roughly where US stocks stand today, hardly qualifies.
The one and only area, with the exception of digital currencies, that stands out today as looking extremely overvalued would
be developed market government bonds. Unfortunately, this is not just an ordinary asset class; it is the asset from which the
most important price is derived from – the price for money. This price is extremely low today and the reason why companies
with no or low earnings are in high demand (as expected profits in the future are discounted at a very low rate only, hence
growth is outperforming value as a style). It obviously affects almost all other assets too, from classic cars to real estate;
interest rates play a critical role in determining the value for them. If I am not paid any interest in the bank, I might just as well
buy this Ferrari and have some fun with it. With many other fellows having the same idea, prices for cars, contemporary art
and many other things will rise.
The difficulty with government bonds is that this market is now more or less cornered by central banks that own approximately
one third of outstanding issuance (another 20% is owned by commercial banks). Add to this the willingness and ability of
central banks to buy bonds on an almost unlimited scale if necessary and we have a perfect mechanism for them to control
the price of money. Hence, at the present stage, it is difficult for us to conceive that this market would be allowed to get out of
4. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 4
control, i.e. bond yields spiking up in a disorderly fashion. Betting against it would also be doomed to fail, even if all hedge
funds in the World were to combine their assets; none of them has the ability to print money to buy bonds.
Furthermore, as outlined here before, inflation, productivity and growth in most countries are at levels that do not necessarily
require higher interest rates. After all, leaving the conspiracy theories of central bank manipulation aside, current long-term
interest rates fairly accurately reflect longer-term growth prospects on the one hand and the availability of huge amounts of
liquidity in the market looking for interest income on the other hand. One only has to have a look at the relationship of US
nominal GDP growth and 30-year Treasury bond yields to see that the mispricing of bond yields might not be as bad as
generally perceived to be.
Returning to the topic of bull market durations, whilst we have not experienced a meaningful correction for quite some time,
the current period is also not too abnormal. Whilst the current bull market is the second-longest in history, this is only the 11th
longest streak without a 10% correction for the S&P500. The longest streak without such decline lasted an astounding 2,553
days between October 1990 and October 1997. There were five instances in the past, when this period lasted at least twice
as long as the current one, according to Bespoke Group. As for 5% corrections, this is now the 7th
longest streak at just less
than 400 days, with the longest observed between 1957 and 1959 for just under 600 days.
Exhibit 4: Longest % rallies without a correction for the S&P500 since 1928
Source(s): Bespoke
The currently observed record-low volatility is just a corollary of this development and not some separately priced asset class
as many appear to believe. This measure dropped to similarly low levels before whenever equity markets were in a protracted
bull run.
This time, volatility is lower also because of new structural factors. Only about 10% of today’s stock market trading volumes
are generated by so-called ‘active investors’. The remaining 90% is shared by algorithmic programmes, day traders and
passive instruments such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs). This category is, by design, not really involved in one of the
markets’ key tasks: price discovery. In other words, most of the volume is traded by various counterparties, irrespective of
price, i.e. valuation. Price discovery is typically what causes volatility as stocks are fluctuating around until a ‘fair price’ is
established at a certain point in time. When passive investors put money into ETFs, the ETF manager, or rather the software
behind it, buys a certain amount of every stock in the particular index, irrespective of the stock being cheap or expensive,
management being good or bad. Did you know that the average 10-K annual report gets downloaded from the SEC’s website
fewer than 30 times between the day it is filed and the next, according to a study by the University of Notre Dame?
This largely hampers the process of price discovery and with more and more passive funds creeping into the marketplace, the
more and more difficult it will become for active managers to be impactful enough to move prices in the right direction from a
fundamental point of view. I believe that the increasing trend towards passive investing is in large part responsible for the
structurally lower volatility in markets.
5. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 5
Exhibit 5: Record-low volatility – we have been there before
Source(s): ACPI, Bloomberg
The reason for the benign market environment is very fundamental; it is our usual suspects of strong earnings growth, low
interest rates and a healthy economy that is, overall, probably as good as it gets. Ironically, until April it was the unwinding of
the Trump trade, i.e. falling bond yields and a weaker dollar that provided much of the tailwind. Despite the chaos in
Washington, the economy was doing fine, exceeding expectations as can be seen in the Citi Economic surprise index. The
dollar fell because of the market losing faith in Trump. Then, forward expectations were adjusted to good actual performance
but, subsequently, they fell short of actual results between April and June which trounced the dollar to its current levels. At this
stage the picture is somewhat mixed but the expectation level is reasonably low, which could help support the currency going
forward.
Exhibit 6: Citi economic surprise indices (lhs) and US ISM headline and ISM new orders-inventories sub index
Source(s): ACPI, Bloomberg
6. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 6
Returning to my opening topic of this letter about seemingly widespread bearishness; there is also often a subtext to the
negative case which is the willingness and hope to buy into the market after a say 10% or 20% correction. I hear this quite
often that investors are prepared to buy the market at much lower levels because then it is obviously cheaper to buy and the
risk is lower. This is undoubtedly true. However, once markets start falling, and I am talking about serious declines, they tend
to continue to fall for an extended period of time. And as we all know, almost everyone starts buying too early and will sit on
losses for some time and maybe capitulate and sell again. This is also the reason why markets crash at the end of a down
move and not at the beginning. What may turn out as a severe market correction always starts out as a fairly orderly down
move before it spirals into a capitulating drop.
Exhibit 7: Typical sequence of an ‘orderly’ decline leading into a ‘crash’
Source(s): ACPI, Bloomberg
The problem is that markets, over time, move higher and lower regularly like ebb and flow and, most of the time, do not crash.
Therefore, it is very hard to conclude that any particular gentle and orderly downtrend will get out of control and result in such
an outcome. Hence, selling down risk assets all the time the market turns south is also not really an option unless they are
outright expensive, because most of the time one will find oneself out of the market and forced to buy back.
The other option - waiting on the side lines with cash - sounds appealing but is more expensive than investors think at the
outset. The reason is simple. Either the correction happens from a much higher level and one loses out on the gains in the
meantime or it does not happen at all over any reasonable period of time.
The result of this frustrating exercise, very often, is another form of capitulation. It happens when potential investors give in
after a long time waiting and buy the market on the way up, not having had a chance to buy cheap. This typically leads to
rising volumes on the way up and, ultimately, to a phase of distribution and sideways markets with higher-than-usual trading
volumes, which concludes a stereotypical bull market.
As for the exercise of waiting for a correction to happen, there is also a real opportunity cost to it. Elm Partners have done an
interesting study recently, trying to quantify this cost. The question they asked was, during times when the market has been
expensive, what has been the average cost or benefit of waiting for a correction of 10% from the starting price level, rather
than investing right away? Elm Partners define expensive as a stock market that is trading one standard deviation above its
historic average CAPE level (cyclically-adjusted price/earnings ratio). Assuming that a potential investor is prepared to wait for
three years, hoping for a 10% correction, they found a 56% probability that the market had a 10% correction within three
years, resulting in a 10% return benefit versus having invested immediately. However, they also found that in the 44% of
cases where the correction did not happen, the average opportunity cost of waiting (profits not made) was about 30%, far
outweighing the potential benefit from waiting. As a result, the mean expected cost of waiting was 8%. They then repeated the
same exercise for different waiting periods, assumed overvaluation levels and expected correction ranges and in all cases the
average cost of waiting was positive. This means that unless investors expect negative total returns from stock markets going
7. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 7
forward over a reasonable period of time, it is of no benefit to wait for a correction to happen. The opportunity cost of waiting
always outweighs the benefits.
Exhibit 8: Expected opportunity cost of waiting for a certain correction over a certain amount of time assuming
different overvaluation levels for US stock markets
Source(s): Elm Partners
These findings are interesting and confirm quantitatively our more anecdotal evidence.
Our preferred way of investing in markets that are not outright cheap is to maintain the desired exposure but apply varying
degrees of hedges to the portfolio using index options until we get fundamentally and valuation-wise stopped out of our
positions. Fortunately, as volatility is low in bull markets, the cost of hedging is also relatively low, albeit not negligible.
Exhibit 9: Shape of the volatility term curve in the summer of 2013 and at present
Source(s): ACPI, Bloomberg
8. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 8
The chart of the volatility term curve for the VIX index shows that hedging costs have come down by between 4 and 5 vol
points compared to 2013 but are not as cheap as spot volatility might suggest as hedges are struck in the future. For instance,
the cost of fully hedging an S&P500 stock portfolio today for one year is about 5%, hardly the free lunch that some suggest
but cheaper than at most points in the past. Furthermore, by using slightly more complex option strategies and hedging only
for a maximum drawdown move, this cost can be brought down substantially – a strategy that we typically deploy as we are in
a late-cycle environment.
July was a strong month for risk assets as the MSCI World equity index gained 2.3%, emerging markets gained 5.5% and US
high-yield bonds 1.2%. Much of that was owed to a weak dollar, where the DXY dollar index lost another 2.9% in July, the
steepest decline since March of last year. The currency lost more than 9% against a basket of its most important trading
partners this year alone.
The flipside of a stronger euro is a weaker performance of European stock markets that became more meaningful especially
from May onwards. For the European or currency-hedged investor this underperformance versus the US amounts to almost
5% ytd. For the non-hedged dollar-based investor, the total return of holding assets in Europe has been great so far at almost
19%.
Exhibit 10: US and European stock performance year-to-date and the euro (NB: the European index includes non-
EUR countries)
Source(s): ACPI, Bloomberg
Trump‘s lack of progress on his reform agenda is the main culprit for the wavering confidence in the US currency in addition to
continued low inflation and a Fed that is less hawkish than it used to be earlier in the year. Wage growth is back down to 2.5%
yoy from 2.8% and the Fed’s favourite inflation gauge, PCE core inflation, was at 1.5% in June, down from as high as 1.9% at
the end of last year. Global integrated markets are largely behind the tame wage inflation picture we are seeing across most
developed countries, according to a recent BIS report, making it difficult for one country to stimulate wage growth without
affecting unemployment numbers.
9. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 9
Exhibit 11: Market-implied probability of a Fed rate increase before the end of 2017
Source(s): ACPI, Bloomberg
As for the euro zone and the UK, markets are currently expecting no outright tightening over the next 1 ½ years. What is more
likely to happen in the US and Europe is rather an addressing of the central banks’ balance sheets whereas the ECB has
already reduced the pace of asset purchases and the Fed has hinted at potentially reducing the amounts from coupon and
redemption proceeds that are being re-invested in the bond market, thereby slowly reducing its balance sheet.
Exhibit 12: Market-implied number of months until the first rate hike
Source(s): ACPI, Bloomberg
10. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 10
The lack of outright hawkishness in combination with solid growth and tame inflation continues to underpin credit markets and
equities. The next Fed funds’ increase is currently anticipated by market participants for March 2018. Nevertheless, as growth
is picking up and synchronising around the World, other central banks are more actively pursuing a policy of ending uber-easy
monetary conditions, although in a very slow fashion.
This change in relative dynamics is what has been driving currencies this year compared to the immediate post US-election
period. However, the dollar is now significantly oversold from a technical standpoint and the EUR is becoming increasingly
strong, which makes a countermove in the short term very likely. Should this consolidation take place, recent trends in equity
markets would also be affected, i.e. US equities and EM could start to underperform other markets.
Exhibit 13: Unemployment in the US is declining while prime-age (25-54 years) labour force participation is rising
with wage growth still in check
Source(s): ACPI, Bloomberg
The US labour market is still going strong as the June non-farm payrolls report came in at 209k, about 30k better than
expected with upward revisions for the previous month. As a result, the unemployment rate fell back to 4.3%. Although the
latest US ISM manufacturing PMI came in slightly below expectations at 56.3 and below the prior month’s figure, it still
indicates that the economy is expanding relatively strongly.
This backdrop makes it difficult for us to see continued dollar weakness going forward although a substantial part of this
correction is owed to the dysfunctional Trump administration where markets by now have given up any hopes for a successful
implementation of healthcare and tax reforms. PredictIt puts the probability of an ACA subsidy repeal this year at 21% while
the likelihood of a successful tax reform implementation before year-end currently stands at 32%.
However, despite the seemingly low odds of successfully passing legislation this year, we believe that one should not throw in
the towel too early on the topic. Congressional Republicans cannot enter the upcoming midterm election season with no
legislative win. They have a natural self-interest at this point to help lift Trump’s popularity and get at least one piece of
significant legislation to pass. If they fail, midterm elections are likely to turn into a disaster and embarrassment for them,
considering that they control both chambers of Congress and the executive.
What is sometimes forgotten is that Trump has indeed made progress on the deregulatory front. Should the current
momentum in this area continue, regulatory activity will be curtailed to levels not seen since the 1970s. This is clearly bullish
11. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 11
for US businesses as the cost of complying with regulations (estimated at USD2trn) exceeds the amount of taxes paid by
corporations (USD1.9trn), according to the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
Exhibit 14: Pages in the US Federal Register
Source(s): Bianco Research
Due to the dollar weakness, companies with international exposure, therefore, outperformed those with predominantly
domestic revenues. As of the end of July, the Russell 2000 index of US small caps gained ‘only’ 5% ytd while the S&P500
rose twice as much.
On a micro level, the current corporate reporting season is strong across the board; in the US, Europe and Asia. For the
S&P500, average Q2 sales and earnings growth figures are currently at 5.4% and 10.1%, respectively, somewhat below the
Q1 level but still strong. Corporate profits as a percentage of GDP have reached a 70-year high in the US.
Looking at Japan, the picture is even more impressive with sales growing at 6% and earnings at a whopping 32%. Quarterly
profits for oil&gas, basic materials, industrials, technology and consumer goods companies rose between 40% and 170% last
quarter. Thanks to strong earnings growth, valuations of Japanese stocks have hardly expanded despite the strong market
performance. We continue to like Japan as this fundamental momentum is likely to continue, albeit at a somewhat slower
pace. Japan is the ultimate value investor’s haven: 41% of stocks in the country are currently trading below book value
whereas this measure is at only 4% for the S&P500 and 14% for the European Stoxx600 index. Add to this the fact that 55%
of Japanese small cap stocks have no analyst coverage at all whilst only 8% of smaller US companies are not covered by the
sell-side and one has all the ingredients for a very asymmetrical investment opportunity. As the pressure on management
boards for better corporate governance and shareholder value creation increases, this continues to be a fertile hunting ground
for attractive investments.
In Europe, quarterly reports are coming in equally impressive. For the top 500 companies, Q2 sales growth was registered at
7.1% with earnings growing at almost 25%. All figures above are year-on-year numbers and one should not forget that
comparables were easy due to the weak Q1 and Q2 of last year as a result of collapsing oil prices. This effect will gradually
wash out over the next two to three quarters.
Aside from that, there are some short and medium-term concerns pertaining to certain market seasonalities. Typically, equity
markets tend to trend sideways between August and October before they enter their most profitable window between
November and May. Furthermore, and this is admittedly somewhat more esoteric and due to the low number of years in
12. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 12
question not statistically significant, markets appear to follow a fairly consistent pattern in years ending with a seven, as can
be seen in the chart below. This is that typically around the third quarter there was some relatively strong down move that
started between August and October and lasted for up to three months.
Exhibit 15: Intra-year seasonal patterns for US stock markets since 1901 (lhs) and average market performance in
years ending with a 7, since 1897 (rhs)
Source(s): Stock Trader’s Almanac, Wellenreiter
As always, these are technical factors that we have to keep in mind but are not driving investment decisions per se. On a
more fundamental level, circling back to the beginning, discussing supposedly bubble-like conditions in US equity markets, I
would highlight that the move higher in stocks over the last years was fairly controlled and valuations expanded steadily as
opposed to parabolically. The latter was always the case in previous raging bull markets that ended with so-called blow off
tops when valuations began to rise faster.
Exhibit 16: Forward relative P/E by S&P500 high and low beta quintiles (lhs) and distribution of S&P500 rolling 5-year
annualised total returns (Dec 1930-July 2017)
Source(s): Richard Bernstein Advisors LLC
What is also missing and can be seen in the chart above is that valuations for high-beta stocks (equities that move faster than
the market in both directions) are not higher than the overall market itself. In fact, both high and low beta stocks are trading
near average market multiples. What one would typically expect in a market that is becoming more irrational is that high beta
names, which are by their nature riskier, would start to run faster and thus expand in valuation terms. This is not the case at
the moment. This lack of momentum on the way up is also visible in the rolling five-year annualised return figures, currently at
just under 15%, which are reasonably high but not consistent with previous bull market peaks. Thus, past bull markets peaked
13. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 13
after an average five-year return streak of 21.4% per annum. We are currently not even half-way there between this number
and the median annual return of markets.
In terms of our positioning, we see no reason to make any wholesale changes at this point. Equities and credit continue to be
in a bull market and we continue to abstain from trying to time markets and calling tops. This can turn out to be an expensive
as well as humiliating exercise. Instead, we stick with our hedges that, thanks to the low-volatility regime, do not cost very
much to establish and maintain and keep our long exposure largely unchanged. Following such an extended streak of monthly
gains, a correction is certainly overdue and welcome by us but we would like to remind investors that this would not be the
time to get nervous as markets never correct just because of valuations. Under normal circumstances, i.e. in the absence of
bubbles, it is central banks that kill the stock market by tightening the monetary screws too much. At the moment, this is not
the case and as for bubbles, we leave it to other market commentators to debate where they are.
14. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 14
Global economic monitor
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Trend
Citi Economic Surprise US 34.7 48.0 -4.8 -38.2 -72.6 -43.1
Citi Economic Surprise G10 41.9 41.8 26.1 2.0 -20.5 -11.1
Citi Economic Surprise Europe 71.1 54.1 70.4 40.6 30.3 19.1
Citi Economic Surprise EM 46.6 34.4 39.5 7.4 12.5 16.3
Citi Economic Surprise UK 92.3 60.8 0.4 -15.1 -15.8 -39.8
ISM manufacturing 57.7 57.2 54.8 54.9 57.8 56.3
ISM new orders 63.15 61.7 60.35 58.6 62 57.8
Global manufacturing PMI 53.6 53.8 53.7 53.8 53.7 53.5
China manufacturing PMI 51.6 51.8 51.2 51.2 51.7 51.4
Japan manufacturing PMI 53.3 52.4 52.7 53.1 52.4 52.1
US durable goods orders 1.4 2.4 -0.8 0.0 6.4
US initial jobless claims 227 235 238 255 250 240
US Industrial production 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.4
Euro Industrial production -0.1 0.4 0.3 1.3
Japan Industrial production 3.2 -1.9 4.0 -3.6 1.6
US retail sales -0.2 0.1 0.3 -0.1 -0.2
Euro retail sales 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.5
Japan retail sales 0.2 2.1 3.2 2.1 2.1
China retail sales 10.7 10.7 11.0
US consumer confidence 116.1 124.9 119.4 117.6 117.3 121.1
Euro consumer confidence -6.4 -5.1 -3.6 -3.3 -1.3 -1.7
ifo German business expectations 104.1 105.4 105.2 106.5 106.8 107.3
China export trade -1.9 16.0 7.5 8.3 11.3
South Korea export trade 20.2 13.6 24.1 13.3 13.6 19.5
German export trade 6.1 4.7 5.7 8.7
China monthly money supply 11.1 10.6 10.5 9.6 9.4
US personal income 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.0
Source(s): ACPI, Bloomberg
15. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 15
The Global PMI heatmap
Country/RegionCategory/SectorJul-2017Jun-2017May-2017Apr-2017Mar-2017Feb-2017Jan-2017Dec-2016Nov-2016Oct-2016Sep-2016Aug-2016Jul-2016Jun-2016May-2016Apr-2016Mar-2016Feb-2016Jan-2016Dec-2015Nov-2015Oct-2015Sep-2015Aug-2015Jul-2015
AustriaManufacturing60.060.758.058.156.857.257.356.355.453.953.552.153.454.552.052.052.851.951.250.651.453.052.550.552.4
BrazilComposite49.448.550.450.448.746.644.745.245.344.946.144.446.442.338.339.040.839.045.143.944.542.742.744.840.8
BrazilManufacturing50.050.552.050.149.646.944.045.246.246.346.045.746.043.241.642.646.044.547.445.643.844.147.045.847.2
BrazilServices48.847.449.250.347.746.445.145.144.443.945.342.745.641.437.337.438.636.944.443.545.543.041.744.839.1
CanadaManufacturing55.554.755.155.955.554.753.551.851.551.150.351.151.951.852.152.251.549.449.347.548.648.048.649.450.8
ChinaComposite51.951.151.551.252.152.652.253.552.952.951.451.851.950.350.550.851.349.450.149.450.549.948.048.850.2
ChinaManufacturing51.150.449.650.351.251.751.051.950.951.250.150.050.648.649.249.449.748.048.448.248.648.347.247.347.8
ChinaServices51.551.652.851.552.252.653.153.453.152.452.052.151.752.751.251.852.251.252.450.251.252.050.551.553.8
CzechRepublicManufacturing55.356.456.457.557.557.655.753.852.253.352.050.149.351.853.353.654.355.556.955.654.254.055.556.657.5
DevelopedMarketsManufacturing54.053.954.154.153.954.154.253.853.052.651.551.351.551.250.450.550.950.852.152.052.352.551.751.952.2
DevelopedMarketsServices54.554.554.254.254.153.754.553.954.053.651.851.651.451.652.052.351.751.253.353.954.854.253.955.254.7
DevelopedMarketsComposite54.454.554.454.454.254.154.654.154.053.752.051.851.651.551.551.951.751.253.253.754.654.053.654.654.4
EgyptWholeEconomy48.647.247.347.445.946.743.342.841.842.046.347.048.947.547.646.944.548.148.048.245.047.250.251.249.2
EmergingMarketsComposite51.451.552.352.052.652.151.951.951.551.851.151.351.450.049.549.950.549.050.149.550.249.848.949.850.2
EmergingMarketsManufacturing50.950.850.650.951.651.350.851.150.851.050.350.150.349.349.549.650.248.949.449.049.249.048.448.649.1
EmergingMarketsServices51.251.652.952.252.351.952.151.650.951.151.051.251.350.749.149.950.048.950.849.550.250.449.950.751.1
EuropeanUnionComposite55.355.856.356.756.155.654.654.954.153.652.953.051.953.053.152.853.353.054.054.554.554.253.554.554.6
EuropeanUnionManufacturing56.256.856.756.755.955.355.254.953.553.452.951.951.452.851.451.451.751.452.452.952.852.652.052.352.6
EuropeanUnionServices55.055.055.756.355.755.053.954.454.153.352.352.851.552.753.452.953.353.254.154.554.654.353.654.754.8
EurozoneComposite55.756.356.856.856.456.054.454.453.953.352.652.953.253.153.153.053.153.053.654.354.253.953.654.353.9
EurozoneManufacturing56.657.457.056.756.255.455.254.953.753.552.651.752.052.851.551.751.651.252.353.252.852.352.052.352.4
EurozoneRetail51.053.252.052.749.549.950.150.448.648.649.651.048.948.550.647.949.250.148.949.048.551.351.951.454.2
EurozoneServices55.455.456.356.456.055.553.753.753.852.852.252.852.952.853.353.153.153.353.654.254.254.153.754.454.0
EurozoneConstruction#N/A53.253.252.553.552.250.752.351.449.449.148.648.346.548.447.549.051.350.349.448.747.848.847.247.1
FranceComposite55.656.656.956.656.855.954.153.151.451.652.751.950.149.650.950.250.049.350.250.151.052.651.950.251.5
FranceManufacturing54.954.853.855.153.352.253.653.551.751.849.748.348.648.348.448.049.650.250.051.450.650.650.648.349.6
FranceRetail54.156.353.351.849.451.753.150.447.347.549.153.051.651.050.648.245.548.148.946.647.851.949.649.552.9
FranceServices56.056.957.256.757.556.454.152.951.651.453.352.350.549.951.650.649.949.250.349.851.052.751.950.652.0
FranceConstruction52.352.353.552.753.251.550.150.650.347.547.845.344.842.343.841.642.744.643.042.244.843.844.242.340.6
GermanyComposite54.756.457.456.757.156.154.855.255.055.152.853.355.354.454.553.654.054.154.555.555.254.254.155.053.7
GermanyManufacturing58.159.659.558.258.356.856.455.654.355.054.353.653.854.552.151.850.750.552.353.252.952.152.353.351.8
GermanyRetail50.754.555.056.252.551.250.352.049.651.053.054.152.051.654.051.054.152.549.550.549.652.454.054.757.7
GermanyServices53.154.055.455.455.654.453.454.355.154.250.951.754.453.755.254.555.155.355.056.055.654.554.154.953.8
GermanyConstruction55.855.155.354.656.454.152.054.953.952.952.451.651.650.452.753.455.859.657.955.552.551.852.450.350.6
GreeceManufacturing50.550.549.648.246.747.746.649.348.348.649.250.448.750.448.449.749.048.450.050.248.147.343.339.130.2
HongKongWholeEconomy51.351.150.551.149.949.649.950.349.548.249.349.047.245.447.245.345.546.446.146.446.646.645.744.448.2
IndiaComposite46.052.752.551.352.350.749.447.649.155.452.454.652.451.150.952.854.351.253.351.650.252.651.552.652.0
IndiaManufacturing47.950.951.652.552.550.750.449.652.354.452.152.651.851.750.750.552.451.151.149.150.350.751.252.352.7
IndiaServices45.953.152.250.251.550.348.746.846.754.552.054.751.950.351.053.754.351.454.353.650.153.251.351.850.8
IndonesiaManufacturing48.649.550.651.250.549.350.449.049.748.750.950.448.451.950.650.950.648.748.947.846.947.847.448.447.3
IrelandComposite57.058.058.758.756.957.859.358.455.554.054.856.956.559.259.158.160.759.561.159.260.257.759.559.761.8
IrelandManufacturing54.656.055.955.053.653.855.555.753.752.151.351.750.253.051.552.654.952.954.354.253.353.653.853.656.7
IrelandServices58.357.659.561.159.160.661.059.156.054.656.259.759.561.261.759.862.862.164.061.863.660.162.462.163.4
IrelandConstruction#N/A58.263.661.360.857.955.758.959.862.358.758.461.059.755.956.462.368.863.658.655.556.355.856.559.1
ItalyComposite56.254.555.256.854.254.852.852.953.451.151.151.952.252.650.853.152.453.753.856.054.353.953.455.053.5
ItalyManufacturing55.155.255.156.255.755.053.053.252.250.951.049.851.253.552.453.953.552.253.255.654.954.152.753.855.3
ItalyRetail47.347.145.548.345.145.545.647.948.846.545.043.240.340.245.242.646.649.447.950.247.748.851.748.750.7
ItalyServices56.353.655.156.252.954.152.452.353.351.050.752.352.051.949.852.151.253.853.655.353.453.453.354.652.0
ItalyConstruction49.951.049.048.649.049.949.250.248.545.945.147.746.944.947.245.345.846.147.248.647.346.448.548.049.2
JapanComposite51.852.953.452.652.952.252.352.852.051.348.949.850.149.049.248.949.951.052.652.252.352.351.252.951.5
JapanManufacturing52.152.453.152.752.453.352.752.451.351.450.449.549.348.147.748.249.150.152.352.652.652.451.051.751.2
JapanServices52.053.353.052.252.951.351.952.351.850.548.249.650.449.450.449.350.051.252.451.551.652.251.453.751.2
LebanonWholeEconomy46.346.146.647.546.947.747.747.046.943.845.145.045.544.444.844.145.047.449.147.946.947.148.147.849.3
MexicoManufacturing51.252.351.250.751.550.650.850.251.151.851.950.950.651.153.652.453.253.152.252.453.053.052.152.452.9
NetherlandsManufacturing58.958.657.657.857.858.356.557.357.055.753.453.553.252.052.752.653.651.752.453.453.553.753.053.956.0
PolandManufacturing52.353.152.754.153.554.254.854.351.950.252.251.550.351.852.151.053.852.850.952.152.152.250.951.154.5
RussiaComposite53.454.856.055.356.355.458.356.655.853.753.152.953.553.551.251.350.850.648.447.850.549.050.949.350.9
RussiaManufacturing52.750.352.450.852.452.554.753.753.652.451.150.849.551.549.648.048.349.349.848.750.150.249.147.948.3
SaudiArabiaWholeEconomy55.754.355.356.556.457.056.755.555.053.255.356.656.054.454.854.254.554.453.954.456.355.756.558.757.7
SouthAfricaWholeEconomy50.149.050.250.350.750.551.351.650.850.550.749.849.949.650.247.947.049.149.649.149.647.547.949.348.9
SouthKoreaManufacturing49.150.149.249.448.449.249.049.448.048.047.648.650.150.550.150.049.548.749.550.749.149.149.247.947.6
SpainComposite56.757.757.257.356.857.054.755.555.254.454.154.853.755.754.855.255.154.555.355.256.255.054.658.858.3
SpainManufacturing54.054.755.454.553.954.855.655.354.553.352.351.051.052.251.853.553.454.155.453.053.151.351.753.253.6
SpainServices57.658.357.357.857.457.754.255.055.154.654.756.054.156.055.455.155.354.154.655.156.755.955.159.659.7
TaiwanManufacturing53.653.353.154.456.254.555.656.254.752.752.251.851.050.548.549.751.149.450.651.749.547.846.946.147.1
TurkeyManufacturing53.654.753.551.752.349.748.747.748.849.848.347.047.647.449.448.949.250.350.952.250.949.548.849.350.1
UnitedArabEmiratesWholeEconomy56.055.854.356.156.256.055.355.054.253.354.154.755.353.454.052.854.553.152.753.354.554.056.057.155.8
UnitedKingdomComposite54.153.854.356.154.953.755.256.655.354.853.853.547.552.653.252.053.752.755.755.155.755.253.455.356.8
UnitedKingdomManufacturing55.154.256.357.054.354.655.455.953.454.255.453.548.353.050.549.551.350.952.251.252.554.551.551.852.4
UnitedKingdomServices53.853.453.855.855.053.354.556.255.254.552.652.947.452.353.552.353.752.755.655.555.954.953.355.657.4
UnitedKingdomConstruction51.954.856.053.152.252.552.254.252.852.652.349.245.946.051.252.054.254.255.057.855.358.859.957.357.1
UnitedStatesManufacturing53.352.052.752.853.354.255.054.354.153.451.552.052.951.350.750.851.551.352.451.252.854.153.153.053.8
UnitedStatesServices54.754.253.653.152.853.855.653.954.654.852.351.051.451.451.352.851.349.753.254.356.154.855.156.155.7
UnitedStatesComposite54.653.953.653.253.054.155.854.154.954.952.351.551.851.250.952.451.350.053.254.055.955.055.055.755.7
VietnamManufacturing51.752.551.654.154.654.251.952.454.051.752.952.251.952.652.752.350.750.351.551.349.450.149.551.352.6
WorldComposite53.553.753.853.753.853.653.953.553.353.251.751.751.651.251.051.451.450.652.352.553.352.852.353.253.2
WorldManufacturing52.752.652.652.753.053.052.852.752.152.051.150.851.050.450.150.250.650.050.950.751.051.050.350.550.8
WorldServices53.753.853.953.753.753.353.953.353.353.051.651.551.451.451.351.751.350.752.752.853.753.353.054.153.9
Source(s): ACPI, Bloomberg
The table shows
monthly PMI statistics
across countries and
different sectors per
country for the past two
years.
The latest data is next to
the country/sector name
at the bottom of the
page.
2012 Eurozone crisis
Brazil in recession
Italy’s permanent
recession
Improving picture in
the UK and US
EM recovery
18. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 18
Performance and valuations of international equity markets
Year to Market Rolling 1-yr Rolling 2-yr Rolling 3-yr EPS growth
Country date Cap (USDbn)* change change change 2016E 2017E 2017E 2016E 2017E
WORLD
All Country MSCI MXWD Index 13.6% 52,464 15.3% 13.5% 15.2% 16.9 15.4 10.2% 2.5% 2.7%
Developed World MXWO Index 12.4% 43,035 14.6% 12.6% 16.8% 17.5 15.9 9.8% 2.5% 2.6%
Emerging World MXEF Index 23.8% 9,430 20.5% 20.6% 1.5% 13.4 11.9 12.4% 2.5% 2.7%
AMERICAS
US (S&P500) SPX Index 10.6% 21,966 13.5% 19.2% 29.7% 19.0 17.0 11.4% 2.0% 2.1%
US (Dow Jones Industrial) INDU Index 11.8% 6,103 19.1% 27.2% 35.0% 18.1 16.5 9.7% 2.4% 2.5%
US mid/small cap RTY Index 4.1% 2,268 14.7% 17.0% 26.1% 29.8 22.8 30.5% 1.2% 1.3%
Canada SPTSX Index -0.2% 1,834 4.2% 6.7% 0.9% 17.1 15.4 10.9% 2.9% 3.2%
Mexico MEXBOL Index 12.5% 327 8.8% 14.4% 16.3% 18.9 17.0 11.4% 2.1% 2.2%
Argentina MERVAL Index 28.3% 92 41.0% 94.3% 163.3% 12.8 9.2 39.9% 1.5%
Brazil IBOV Index 11.1% 648 16.0% 37.7% 19.1% 12.9 11.4 12.6% 3.2% 3.7%
EUROPE
Europe SXXP Index 5.8% 11,820 12.1% -3.7% 17.0% 16.0 14.7 9.1% 3.4% 3.6%
Germany DAX Index 7.1% 1,340 18.6% 7.0% 36.1% 13.6 12.6 7.3% 3.0% 3.2%
France CAC Index 7.0% 1,699 18.0% 0.9% 25.4% 15.4 14.1 9.0% 3.2% 3.4%
UK UKX Index 5.2% 2,665 10.6% 11.8% 13.9% 15.5 14.4 8.0% 4.1% 4.3%
Spain IBEX Index 14.0% 783 24.8% -4.7% 5.8% 14.9 13.6 9.6% 3.6% 3.9%
Italy FTSEMIB Index 14.0% 580 31.9% -7.5% 14.7% 15.0 13.0 15.6% 3.5% 3.8%
Switzerland SMI Index 11.6% 1,143 12.0% -2.5% 10.5% 18.2 16.5 10.4% 3.3% 3.5%
Norway OBX Index 7.7% 211 22.0% 16.1% 22.4% 15.9 14.8 7.6% 4.3% 4.6%
Sweden OMX Index 3.7% 596 14.1% -2.4% 17.9% 16.6 15.1 9.9% 3.7% 3.9%
Austria ATX Index 24.5% 106 46.2% 31.0% 45.6% 14.0 13.7 1.9% 2.8% 3.2%
Greece ASE Index 28.9% 58 47.4% 22.6% -24.0% 16.3 16.4 -0.6% 2.6% 2.0%
EMERGING EUROPE
Hungary BUX Index 14.6% 28 34.3% 63.1% 114.0% 12.0 11.3 6.3% 2.5% 3.0%
Kazakhstan KZKAK Index 34.0% 15 67.0% 129.0% 41.1%
Ukraine PFTS Index 8.6% 2 29.8% -13.7% -36.5% 10.1
Russia RTSI$ Index -10.9% 476 9.8% 23.3% -11.3% 6.0 5.4 11.5% 5.5% 6.2%
Poland WIG Index 20.7% 370 31.2% 19.2% 25.1% 12.8 12.1 6.0% 2.9% 3.4%
Czech Rep PX Index 11.3% 51 20.8% -0.7% 7.8% 12.9 13.6 -5.1% 4.9% 4.8%
Turkey XU100 Index 38.9% 192 42.7% 38.4% 37.7% 9.7 8.3 16.9% 3.2% 3.7%
MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA
South Africa TOP40 Index 12.8% 648 9.1% 6.6% 8.7% 14.1 11.8 18.7% 3.1% 3.3%
Egypt Hermes Index 12.6% 66.8% 66.6% 36.6% 12.1 9.7 24.1% 2.9% 3.7%
Namibia FTN098 Index 6.6% 132 7.8% 3.1% 1.7% 10.9 10.7 1.0% 4.4% 4.6%
Nigeria NGSEINDX Index 39.3% 40 36.5% 19.0% -12.2% 18.1%
Israel TA-25 Index -4.9% -5.0% -18.5% 1.0% 12.7 11.4 11.1% 1.9% 2.1%
Saudi Arabia SASEIDX Index -1.6% 12.8% -18.0% -32.8% 14.4 13.2 8.6% 3.2% 3.5%
Qatar DSMIndex -10.5% -13.4% -20.6% -28.5% 14.5 12.7 14.4% 3.4% 3.8%
Dubai DFMGI Index 3.8% 4.4% -11.1% -22.6% 11.0 9.5 16.0% 4.1% 4.2%
ASIA
Asia MXAPEXA Index 33.1% 3,199 33.6% 33.4% 24.8% 13.6 12.3 11.2% 2.5% 2.7%
Japan TPX Index 7.4% 5,496 27.5% -2.8% 29.7% 14.4 13.7 4.7% 2.0% 2.2%
Japan NKY Index 4.4% 3,210 22.7% -3.7% 31.0% 17.1 15.8 8.2% 1.9% 2.0%
Hong Kong HSI Index 25.3% 2,212 24.5% 12.3% 13.0% 13.1 12.0 9.0% 3.7% 3.9%
China domestic shashr Index 5.1% 4,696 9.6% -12.9% 49.2% 14.5 12.9 12.5% 2.0% 2.2%
China offshore HSCEI Index 17.1% 628 20.5% -2.0% 1.2% 8.7 8.0 8.8% 3.5% 3.8%
Taiwan TWSE Index 13.5% 1,021 15.6% 24.5% 15.1% 14.9 13.9 7.6% 3.8% 4.0%
South Korea KOSPI Index 18.2% 1,337 18.7% 19.2% 16.6% 1.6% 1.8%
New Zealand NZSE Index 10.5% 90 2.5% 23.2% 35.9% 20.0 17.6 13.6% 4.2% 4.4%
Australia AS30 Index 0.9% 1,427 3.4% 5.5% 5.0% 16.1 14.7 9.8% 4.3% 4.5%
Pakistan KSE100 Index -1.9% 75 19.0% 29.4% 58.7% 9.8 8.5 14.8% 5.4% 6.1%
Thailand SET50 Index 3.9% 310 4.1% 7.1% -1.9% 15.2 13.9 8.7% 3.1% 3.3%
Indonesia JCI Index 9.1% 482 6.6% 21.1% 14.0% 16.6 14.5 14.6% 2.1% 2.5%
India NIFTY Index 23.0% 1,102 15.9% 17.5% 31.6% 19.6 16.0 22.5% 1.5% 1.7%
Singapore FSSTI Index 15.5% 389 17.6% 4.1% 0.4% 15.1 14.0 7.3% 3.3% 3.5%
Malaysia FBMKLCI Index 8.1% 248 6.6% 5.5% -5.0% 16.4 15.5 5.6% 3.2% 3.4%
Philippines PCOMP Index 16.0% 192 -0.5% 5.3% 14.1% 19.2 17.2 11.7% 1.6% 1.7%
Vietnam VNINDEX Index 18.6% 85 25.7% 30.6% 29.8% 15.7 13.6 15.4% 2.4% 2.5%
Source(s): ACPI, Bloomberg Data as of: 31-Jul-2017 * Market cap for the main index
PER Dividend yield
19. MONTHLY VIEWPOINT
From the Chief Investment Officer Marco E Pabst
9
th
August 2017
ACPI Investments Ltd.
Pegasus House | 37-43 Sackville Street | London W1S 3EH
T +44 (0)20 3697 9580 | F +44 (0)20 3697 9501 | E marco.pabst@acpi.com
www.acpi.com 19
Three-month outlook
Highly indebted major World economies are characterised by low GDP growth, low inflation and de-synchronised growth patterns
whilst the lack of fiscal stimulus puts the burden on the central banks, keeping interest rates low for a long time to come.
Weight
Cash We are slightly overweight cash from reductions in fixed income.
Equities
US
Valuations are high but US equities benefit from a weaker dollar and strong earnings. Rising wages and a stronger dollar could
provide EPS headwinds. Positive sentiment was the missing ingredient to push stocks closer to the tops in this cycle.
Europe
With most elections in Europe behind us and growth picking up, the outlook has improved for the Eurozone. Potential ECB
tapering is likely to support the euro and the financial sector. Earnings growth continues to be robust.
Japan
Japanese equity markets are still amongst the cheapest globally and for as long as yields remain anchored, the market remains
attractive, although currency volatility induces substantial equity volatility in the country.
China
H shares are attractive but onshore markets are still overvalued with the country undergoing a major transition. The domestic
consumer is becoming stronger and savings are rising, helped by pro-growth fiscal support.
EM
The weaker dollar and the dysfunctional Trump administration are positive for EM. Earnings growth is solid and valuations
reasonable although political risks are present and the outlook for a stronger dollar is not priced into EM equities.
Central
Banks
Aggregate central bank balance sheets are still expanding on a global level although the Fed started tightening already and the
ECB is expected to announce similar steps soon.
FixedIncome
DM govt
After the correction in DM government bonds in the second half of 2016, yield levels look more attractive than before, especially
in the US. In the medium term, yields can rise further as expectations for growth and inflation improve.
EM govt
Dollar bonds of countries with low external debt levels and low/no trade and budget deficits are interesting. Should the dollar
strengthen again, risks within EM would increase.
DM credit
Spreads have been tightening, supported by recovering commodity prices. Spreads in the US and the UK are more attractive
than in the Eurozone where rates are extremely low but likely to rise.
EM credit
We avoid issuers with substantial hard-currency debt relative to the underlying revenue mix. We would stress-test balance sheets
against any EM FX deterioration. Spreads for fundamentally strong issuers in hard currency are attractive.
Alt FI
We like alternative areas of fixed income such as peer-to-peer lending (P2P) and structured credit. P2P lending offers diversified
and uncorrelated low double-digit return streams and returns in structured credit are still attractive.
Currencies
USD
It appears unlikely that the Fed will be able to raise policy rates substantially in the near future. Wage growth and inflation are low
in the US and there is no imminent risk of an inflationary overshoot. GDP growth is solid, which is positive for the USD.
EUR
Following several elections in Europe, the risk premium for European assets should decline and the euro should benefit
accordingly. Any further tapering by the ECB would also be bullish for the euro and Eurozone assets. Short term overbought.
JPY
The BoJ has turned less aggressive recently with regards to providing additional monetary stimulus. The market is trying to find a
new direction for the yen. Inflation is positive but stable and GDP growth is also robust, which is positive for the currency.
EM
The weaker dollar has provided tailwinds for EM currencies this year. We prefer commodity exporters over commodity importers.
We like RUB, MXN, INR and avoid TRY.
GBP
The GBP cheapened substantially as a result of the Brexit vote. Due to the long timeline of the Brexit process and unpredictable
political noise, uncertainty will continue, adding a substantial risk premium to the currency.
Commodities
Oil
It appears that the rebalancing of the oil market will take longer than expected with Saudi Arabia drawing down its reserves and
the outlook hinges on demand growth as well as OPEC’s ability to control output.
Metals Industrial metals have been supported by the outlook of more reflationary policies and fiscal stimulus, especially in the US.
General
We believe that after its five-year (2011-2015) streak of high negative returns, the commodity complex in general could become
more attractive again, especially energy and agricultural commodities but also precious metals as a hedge against tail risks.