SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 27
Download to read offline
Water is Life International
Wa(SHG) Pilot Program
Endline Survey Report
March 2016
Report prepared by Elizabeth Poulsen | elizabeth.ann.poulsen@gmail.com
Wa(SHG) Project Manager: Stephenie Chatfield | stephenie.chatfield@waterislifeinternational.com
WiLi Executive Director: David Harding | david.harding@waterislifeinternational.com
Water is Life, International (WiLi) | P.O. Box 540318 | Orlando, FL 32854 | (407) 716-4214
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | ii
Table of Contents
Introduction.......................................................................................................................................1	
Methodology......................................................................................................................................1	
Limitations.................................................................................................................................... 2	
Summary of Results ......................................................................................................................... 2	
Demographic Information about Survey Respondents ............................................................... 2	
Personal Sanitation....................................................................................................................... 2	
Water Treatment Knowledge and Practices............................................................................. 3	
Hand-Washing Knowledge and Practices ................................................................................ 3	
Incidence of Diarrheal Disease..................................................................................................... 4	
Latrine Ownership........................................................................................................................ 5	
Recommendations............................................................................................................................ 5	
Conclusions....................................................................................................................................... 5	
Appendix A: Program Logical Framework ...................................................................................... 6	
Appendix B: Complete Baseline and Endline Survey Data ............................................................. 9	
Appendix C: Survey Instrument (Questionnaire)...........................................................................21	
Acronyms
CLA Cluster-Level Association
KAP Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices
SHG Self-Help Group
WaSH Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
Wa(SHG) Wili’s Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Self-Help Group Program
WiLi Water is Life, International
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 1
Introduction
More than 70 percent of Ethiopia’s population lives without improved sanitation
coverage. This, coupled with poor sanitation behaviors, contributes to a high prevalence of
water-borne disease which disproportionately affects rural populations. Water is Life,
International (Wili) aims to address this health burden through their Wa(SHG) program, which
focuses primarily on changing personal sanitation and hygiene behaviors, with a secondary
focus on providing bio-sand water filters. Wili’s interventions will primarily be implemented to
and through an existing network of Self-Help Groups (SHGs), organized by Cluster-Level
Associations (CLAs). Partner organizations for the Wa(SHG) program include Tearfund,
Ethiopian Kale Heywet Church, Ethiopian Guenet Church, Desert Rose Consultancy, and the
Ethiopian Kale Heywet Church WET Center.
Wili conducted a pilot phase of the Wa(SHG) program from March 2015-February 2016
in the Dale and Shebedino Districts of the Awasa township in southern Ethiopia (see Figure 1).
The overall goal of this pilot phase was to test the effectiveness of the Wa(SHG) program, with a
focus on improving personal hygiene behaviors, alleviating the burden of water-borne diseases,
and improving the basic sanitation of program participants. A number of tools will assess
whether this pilot phase was successful; this report details the data uncovered through baseline
and endline KAP (knowledge, attitudes, and practices) surveys.
Figure 1: The Wa(SHG) project took place in the Dale and Shebedino districts of the Awasa township in southern
Ethiopia. (Image sources: commons.wikimedia.org, forecedmigration.org)
Methodology
The KAP surveys were designed to measure the overall project goal, as well as one of the
project’s four objectives; the full list of objectives are detailed in the program’s logical
framework, in Appendix A. This goal and objective (and their corresponding indicators) that this
report will discuss are as follows:
Program Goal/Impact: To test the implementation of a participatory WaSH training
program through the SHG network in order to improve personal hygiene behaviors,
alleviate the burden of water-borne diseases, and to improve the basic sanitation of
individuals in Ethiopia.
Indicator 1: Personal sanitation behaviors
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 2
Indicator 2: Incidence of diarrheal disease
Indicator 3: SHG members that have latrines
Program Objective 2: SHG members have an increased level of awareness and
knowledge of personal WaSH issues
Indicator 2.1: Knowledge of critical hand-washing times
Indicator 2.2: Awareness of disease-transmission and basic hygiene practices
A total of 219 baseline and 210 endline KAP surveys were conducted, representing about 20
percent of the total number of intended direct beneficiaries (1,000 people), and 5 percent of
total intended direct and indirect beneficiaries (4,500 people). The survey was conducted using
pen-and-paper questionnaires, by a team of enumerators who visited randomly selected
households in the program districts. All respondents indicated their consent to participate in the
survey after being informed about the survey purpose and their right to decline to participate.
Limitations	
Much of the information gathered through the survey was self-reported: in many cases,
there was no way for the enumerator to verify whether the respondent was telling the truth (e.g.,
disease incidence, water treatment practices, personal hygiene practices, etc.). In these cases, it
is possible that the respondent may have wished to present the “right” answer, rather than the
truthful one, due to an (understandable) fear of judgment by the enumerator.
Additionally, English translations for open answers to survey questions (e.g.,
explanations for selecting “other”) were not available for the endline data. Fortunately, this did
not significantly limit analysis.
Summary of Results
This section will detail key results of the baseline and endline surveys, with a focus on
the program indicators previously outlined. For a detailed depiction of the answers to all of the
questions asked in the survey, including disaggregation by gender and rural/urban location
(when applicable), see Appendix B.
Demographic	Information	about	Survey	Respondents		
In both the baseline and endline surveys, the majority of respondents were female (85%
and 68% in each respective survey). Most were married (77% and 81%), and between the ages of
18-40 (70% and 68%). About half of the households had between 4-6 people, while a third had
7-9 people, and around 15 percent had 1-3 people; 3 percent of households had over 10 people.
Between 77-86 percent of the households said that the male head of household could read, while
55-64 percent said that the female head of household could read.
Personal	Sanitation		
As outlined in the previous section of this report, the first indicator that will help to
measure the overall goal of the Wa(SHG) program is “personal sanitation behaviors.” The KAP
survey included a number of questions realting to this indicator, regarding water treatment and
hand-washing knowledge and practices.
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 3
Water	Treatment	Knowledge	and	Practices	
As seen in Figure 2, there was a clear
increase in the number of respondents who
could identify at least one way to treat water.
Interestingly, the most-commonly cited
method for treating water changed from
baseline to endline, with solar disinfection
mentioned most commonly in the baseline,
and settling mentioned most frequently in the
endline (see Appendix B for more details).
There was a slight increase in the number of
respondents who said that they did something
to make their water safer to drink (58% to
64%), though this number is still relatively low.
There was a dramatic decrease in the number of
respondents who said that household members always drink
untreated water (see Figure 3), indicating that water
treatments practices are, in fact, probably increasing. There
were no major age or gender differences in the reported
frequency of drinking untreated water, but it is still much more
common in rural areas (70%) than urban areas (2%). Of
respondents who sometimes do not treat their water, this lack
of treatment is most likely to occur during the rainy season, or
when there is a lack of money (this was more commonly
mentioned in the endline survey than the baseline). There was
a drastic decrease in the number of respondents who said they
did not know how to treat their water (42% to 2%), that they
did not have a method to (41% to 3%), or that they forgot (26%
to 3%). However, nearly a third of respondents in the endline
survey said that they sometimes did not treat their water
because of a bad taste or a bad smell.
Hand-Washing	Knowledge	and	Practices	
In both the baseline and endline
surveys, most respondents named several
instances in which they usually wash their
hands, including before and after eating, before
preparing food, and after handling trash. There
was a noticeable increase in those who said they
washed their hands after latrine use (as seen in
Figure 4); reporting hand-washing after
defecation also increased noticeably.
Encouragingly, there was also a dramatic
increase in the number of respondents who
reported washing their hands with soap (36% to
76%), though 31 percent of respondents in rural
areas still do not wash their hands with soap.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Female Male Rural Urban
Baseline Endline
Figure 2: Percent of respondents who can identify at
least one way to treat water. (Overall: Baseline, 83%;
Endline, 95%)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Baseline Endline
Always Sometimes Never
Figure 3: Reported frequency with
which household members drink
untreated water
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Female Male Rural Urban
Baseline Endline
Figure 4: Percent of respondents who say they wash
their hands after latrine use. (Overall: Baseline, 59%;
Endline, 88%)
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 4
As seen in Figure 5, there was also a dramatic
increase in the number of households that had soap
present in a hand-washing area or near their latrine. This
data was based on first-hand observation by the survey
enumerators, and thus is likely to be even more reliable
than the self-reported hygiene behaviors.
For those who said that they don’t wash their
hands with soap, the most commonly cited reasons for
this were that it’s “not a common practice here,” or
“negligence/laziness.”
Incidence	of	Diarrheal	Disease	
The second goal-level indicator for the Wa(SHG) program is incidence of diarrheal
disease; incidence of malaria will also be discussed briefly, even though it is not a major focus of
the program.
There was a decrease in the percent of respondents who
reported that a family member had experienced diarrhea in the two
weeks proceeding the baseline survey (23%) versus the endline
survey (10%), indicating that the Wa(SHG) program activities were
indeed successful in achieving their goal. However, there is a
possibility that this change is attributable to something other than
Wili’s programming, for instance if there were other related
interventions occurring in the program region, or if there are
normally seasonal fluctuations in diarrheal disease incidence, etc.
There was also an increase in the percentage of respondents who correctly identified
causes of diarrhea; interestingly though, there was not much increase in those who mentioned
“dirty water” as a cause of diarrhea, and the percentage of those who mentioned dirty water in
rural areas actually went down. In the endline survey, knowledge for all causes of diarrhea was
higher in urban areas, and was higher among women as compared to male respondents.
Similarly, knowledge regarding prevention of
diarrhea increased from baseline to endline, with
especially noticeable increases among those who
mentioned “wash hands with soap” (45% to 64%) and
“treat water” (38% to 55%). However, as with many
other indicators, disaggregating these figures by rural
versus urban area provides a more nuanced view: while
nearly all respondents in urban areas connected hand-
washing and water treatment with diarrheal disease, less
than half of those in rural areas did so (see Figure 6).
Covering food and preparing food properly were also
mentioned frequently in the endline survey.
The reported incidence of malaria decreased slightly from baseline to endline (9% to
3%). Knowledge regarding malaria causes and prevention did not change dramatically, although
respondents were less likely to name incorrect causes of malaria in the endline survey, and they
were slightly more likely to mention eliminating breeding sites and using oil/lotion/herbs on
0%
50%
100%
Baseline Endline
Rural Urban
Figure 5: Soap is present in household.
(Overall: Baseline, 23%; Endline, 81%)
57%
Decrease in diarrheal
disease incidence
0%
50%
100%
"Wash	hands	
with	soap"
"Treat	water"
Rural Urban
Figure 6: Two named ways of preventing
diarrheal disease (from endline survey)
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 5
skin as prevention measures in the endline survey. Interestingly, as with knowledge regarding
diarrhea prevention, female endline survey respondents were more likely to name correct causes
and prevention measures for malaria than were male respondents.
Latrine	Ownership	
Unfortunately, both in the baseline and endline surveys, there are inconsistencies in the
data relating to latrine ownership. For example, even though 99 percent of endline survey
respondents stated that their family owns a latrine, half of the respondents stated that they
share a latrine with at least one other family, with many respondents sharing latrines with over
seven families. It is possible that respondents still considered a latrine to be under their
ownership even if it is shared, but this is not clear.
Additionally, there is variation in the recorded type of latrine owned by respondents: in
the baseline survey, 97 percent of respondents in urban areas stated that they had a pit latrine
with a slab, while 90 percent of urban respondents in the endline survey reported having a flush
or pour flush latrine. This could be due to an error in data entry, or (less likely) due to a very
different sampling strategy used in the baseline versus endline survey. Of course, it is also
possible (though also not likely) that nearly all households in the urban areas constructed a flush
latrine within the last year.
Recommendations
While the endline survey shows a similar magnitude of improvement in rural and urban
areas, it clearly indicates that the biggest gap in knowledge, practices, and health outcomes
remains in the rural areas. Therefore, future programming may wish to focus primarily or
exclusively on rural regions.
Additionally, since levels of knowledge relating to hygienic practices and water-borne
diseases are consistently higher among women than men, future programming could aim to
target men and women equally, rather than placing a heavier focus on women (as is a common
practice in many development programs). However, if it is determined that focusing on women
would help the program benefits to reach a higher number of people (e.g., children), then
focusing on women may in fact be appropriate.
Conclusions
Without further information regarding other programming taking place in the region
and other contextual details, it is difficult to definitively state that the positive trends outlined in
this report are due to Wili’s Wa(SHG) program. However, this assessment does provide strong
evidence that this is probably the case. Not only are Wili’s (probable) program effects diverse—
spanning knowledge, practices, and health outcomes—but the magnitude of change is also
remarkable, especially given the limited timeframe of the pilot phase. The project team and Wili
leadership should be congratulated for a job well done, and should regard their plans for future
programming with increased confidence.
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 6
Appendix A: Program Logical Framework
Objectives	 Indicators	 Evidence	 Risks	or	Assumptions	
Goal/Impact	
To	test	the	implementation	of	
a	participatory	WaSH	training	
program	through	the	SHG	
network	in	order	to	improve	
personal	hygiene	behaviors,	
alleviate	the	burden	of	water-
borne	diseases,	and	to	
improve	the	basic	sanitation	of	
individuals	in	Ethiopia	
	
• Personal	sanitation	
behaviors	
• Incidence	of	diarrheal	
disease	
• SHG	members	that	
have	latrines	
	
	
KAP	Survey	
	
	
Purpose(s)/Outcome(s)	
1.Improved	facilitation	skills	
and	capacity	of	12	FLFs	and	
members	of	12	CLA	
members	
	
		
1.1 Individual	
performance	during	
program	
implementation	
	
	
Program	Records	
	
	
• Discovery/participatory	
learning	model	will	be	more	
effective	than	didactic	
learning	model	
• FLFs	and	CLA	members	will	
be	effective	facilitators	
2.SHG	members	have	an	
increased	level	of	
awareness	and	knowledge	
of	personal	WaSH	issues	
2.1 Knowledge	of	critical	
handwashing	times	
2.2 Awareness	of	disease	
transmission	and	
basic	hygiene	
practices	
KAP	Survey,	
Participant	Surveys,	
Facilitator	Reflections	
	
• SHG	members	want	to	learn	
about	WaSH	
• SHG	members	consistently	
attend	group	meetings	and	
receive	trainings	
3.SHG	members	take	
meaningful	action	to	
improve	the	WaSH	
condition	of	their	families,	
homes,	and	communities	
3.1 Presence	of	tippy-
taps	in	homes	
3.2 Presence	of	soap	
3.3 Presence	of	latrines	
in	homes	
3.4 Change	in	personal	
sanitation	and	
hygiene	behaviors	
Individual	Actions	
Plans,	Participant	
Surveys	
• SHG	members	are	
empowered	within	their	
household	to	take	action	
• SHG	members	have	access	to	
financial	resources	to	make	
changes	
4.Bio-sand	filters	are	locally	
available	and	purchased	by	
SHG	members	
4.1	Presence	of	BSFs	in	
homes	
4.2	Intention	to	purchase	
BSF	
BSF	M&E,	Individual	
Action	Plans	
• SHG	members	are	interested	
in	buying	a	bio-sand	filter	
• SHG	members	have	the	
financial	resources	to	buy	bio-
sand	filters
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 7
Outputs	
1. Twelve	FLFs	and	twelve	
CLA	members	are	
trained	in	participatory	
facilitation	skills	
	
Certificate	in	
Foundational	
Facilitation	Skills	
	
	
Program	Records	
	
	
Participants	will	be	interested	
and	complete	the	entire	
course	
	
2. One	thousand	SHG	
members	are	supported	
and	trained	in	WaSH	
Awareness	and	
implementing	actions	
plans	
Attendance	at	weekly	
trainings	
	
Desire	to	learn	WaSH	
Awareness	
	
Completed	and	
implemented	Action	
Plans	
Weekly	Attendance	
Sheets,	Participant	
Surveys,	Facilitator	
Reflections,	Individual	
Action	Plans	
	
Water-borne	diseases	are	a	
health	burden	
Sanitation	and	hygiene	
resources	(eg.	Soap,	bottles,	
chlorines	tabs,	etc.)	locally	
available	and	affordable	
Individuals	and	SHGs	have	the	
capacity	to	take	community	
action	(eg.	Building	latrines)	
3. Two	locally	established	
bio-sand	filter	
manufacturers	serving	
the	communities	and	
SHGs	
Presence	of	bio-sand	
filter	manufacturing	
shop	
	
Sales	record	
BSF	M&E,	Individual	
Action	Plans	
	
SHG	members	have	the	
financial	resources	to	buy	
bio-sand	filters	
Materials	necessary	for	
manufacturing	locally	
available	and	affordable	
4. Program	successfully	
monitored	and	
evaluated	in	a	manner	
that	promotes	
excellence	and	learning	
Baseline	and	terminal	
KAP	survey	report	
	
Weekly	monitoring	
booklets	kept	and	
completed	
KAP	Survey,	
Monitoring	materials
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 8
Activities	
Output	1	
1. Develop	and	produce	a	Foundational	
Facilitation	Skills	module	
2. Provide	the	training	module	to	12	identified	
FLFs	and	12	CLA	representatives		
	
Output	2	
1. Adapt	WaSH	Awareness	training	curriculum	to	
the	SHG	context	and	produce	materials	
2. Identify	12	FLFs	and	12	CLA	representatives	to	
be	trained	
3. Train	12	FLFs	in	ToT	of	WaSH	curriculum,	
building	on	the	foundational	facilitation	skills	
training	
4. Support	the	training	of	CLA	members	in	WaSH	
curriculum	
5. Support	the	training	of	SHG	members	in	
WaSH	curriculum	
6. Track	the	establishment	and	implementation	
of	Action	Plans	
	
Output	3	
1. Identify	and	capacitate	two	local	
manufacturers	to	produce	bio-sand	filters	
2. Include	household	water	treatment	options,	
including	bio-sand	filters,	in	WaSH	curriculum	
	
Output	4	
1. Design	monitoring	and	evaluation	tools	and	
formats	
2. Translate	materials	to	Amharic	
3. Train	program	staff	on	monitoring	plan	
4. Conduct	baseline	and	terminal	KAP	surveys	
5. Analyze	monitoring	and	evaluation	data	
Necessary	resources	available	in	Ethiopia	
	
FLFs	and	CLA	members	schedules	accommodate	a	
multiple	day	training	
	
	
Necessary	resources	available	in	Ethiopia	
	
Proper	permissions	allow	for	editing	of	WaSH	
Awareness	materials	
	
Strongly	established	CLAs	exist	in	target	area	
	
FLFs	have	time	to	receive	this	training	
	
FLFs	have	time	to	give	training	to	CLA	members	
	
CLA	members	have	time	to	give	training	to	SHGs	over	
a	period	of	12	weeks	
	
Effective	monitoring	system	established	
	
Local	manufacturer	will	want	to	learn	a	new	skill	and	
commit	to	developing	a	new	business	
	
	
	
Necessary	resources	available	in	Ethiopia	
	
Monitoring	formats	are	practical	for	intended	
purposes	
	
Staff	makes	time	to	do	regular	monitoring
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 9
Appendix B: Complete Baseline and Endline Survey Data
Household	Demographics	
Baseline	 Endline	
Total	
(n=219)	
Female	
(n=186)	
Male	
(n=33)	
Rural	
(n=129)	
Urban	
(n=90)	
Total	
(n=210)	
Female	
(n=158)	
Male	
(n=44)	
Rural	
(n=140)	
Urban	
(n=70)	
Gender	of	the	respondent	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Female	 85%	 		 		 		 		 78%	 		 		 		 		
			Male	 15%	 		 		 		 		 22%	 		 		 		 		
What	is	your	marital	status?	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Single	 9%	 		 		 		 		 7%	 		 		 		 		
			Married	 77%	 		 		 		 		 81%	 		 		 		 		
			Separated/Divorced	 4%	 		 		 		 		 2%	 		 		 		 		
			Widow/er	 10%	 		 		 		 		 9%	 		 		 		 		
How	old	are	you	now?	(average)	 37	 		 		 		 		 36	 		 		 		 		
Age	bracket	of	the	respondent	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			12-17	 3%	 		 		 		 		 2%	 		 		 		 		
			18-40	 70%	 		 		 		 		 68%	 		 		 		 		
			41-59	 20%	 		 		 		 		 25%	 		 		 		 		
			60+	 7%	 		 		 		 		 5%	 		 		 		 		
Who	is	the	respondent?	(relationship	
within	the	household)	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Wife	 80%	 		 		 		 		 72%	 		 		 		 		
			Husband	 13%	 		 		 		 		 20%	 		 		 		 		
			Daughter	 3%	 		 		 		 		 4%	 		 		 		 		
			Son	 2%	 		 		 		 		 4%	 		 		 		 		
			Grandparent	 1%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
			Other	 1%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
How	many	people	are	living	in	the	
household?	(average)	
	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			1-3	 15%	 		 		 		 		 16%	 		 		 		 		
			4-6	 51%	 		 		 		 		 49%	 		 		 		 		
			7-9	 31%	 		 		 		 		 32%	 		 		 		 		
			10-12	 3%	 		 		 		 		 2%	 		 		 		 		
Male	head	of	household	can	read	 77%	 		 		 70%	 94%	 86%	 		 		 84%	 91%	
Female	head	of	household	can	read	 55%	 		 		 36%	 82%	 64%	 		 		 56%	 82%
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 10
Household	Water	Supply	and	Practices	
Baseline	 Endline	
Total	
(n=219)	
Female	
(n=186)	
Male	
(n=33)	
Rural	
(n=129)	
Urban	
(n=90)	
Total	
(n=210)	
Female	
(n=158)	
Male	
(n=44)	
Rural	
(n=140)	
Urban	
(n=70)	
Who	usually	collects	water	for	the	
family?	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Adult	women	 41%	 		 		 55%	 21%	 56%	 		 		 69%	 30%	
			Girls	 33%	 		 		 34%	 32%	 34%	 		 		 27%	 48%	
			Boys	 13%	 		 		 5%	 23%	 7%	 		 		 2%	 16%	
			Adult	men	 7%	 		 		 3%	 12%	 3%	 		 		 2%	 6%	
			Delivered	 4%	 		 		 1%	 8%	 0%	 		 		 0%	 0%	
			Other	 2%	 		 		 2%	 3%	 0%	 		 		 0%	 0%	
Distance	between	dwelling	and	source	
of	drinking	water	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Within	500m	 58%	 		 		 27%	 95%	 77%	 		 		 66%	 98%	
			500m-1km	 22%	 		 		 36%	 5%	 18%	 		 		 26%	 1%	
			1km-3km	 11%	 		 		 21%	 0%	 5%	 		 		 8%	 0%	
			More	than	3km	 9%	 		 		 17%	 0%	 0%	 		 		 0%	 0%	
Minutes	spent	collecting	water	(round-
trip)	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Under	30	 53%	 		 		 24%	 94%	 71%	 		 		 57%	 99%	
			30	mins	-	1	hour	 13%	 		 		 18%	 5%	 17%	 		 		 25%	 1%	
			1-2	hours	 21%	 		 		 36%	 0%	 7%	 		 		 10%	 0%	
			2+	hours	 13%	 		 		 22%	 1%	 5%	 		 		 8%	 0%	
Household	Water	Treatment	and	
Storage	
Baseline	 Endline	
Total	
(n=219)	
Female	
(n=186)	
Male	
(n=33)	
Rural	
(n=129)	
Urban	
(n=90)	
Total	
(n=210)	
Female	
(n=158)	
Male	
(n=44)	
Rural	
(n=140)	
Urban	
(n=70)	
Number	of	large	jerry	cans	collected	
each	day	for	entire	household	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			1	 1%	 		 		 		 		 1%	 		 		 		 		
			2	 39%	 		 		 		 		 42%	 		 		 		 		
			3-4	 29%	 		 		 		 		 35%	 		 		 		 		
			4+	 31%	 	 	 	 	 22%
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 11
Named	ways	of	making	water	safer	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Solar	disinfection	 36%	 		 		 		 		 16%	 		 		 		 		
			Boiling	 35%	 		 		 		 		 51%	 		 		 		 		
			Settling	 23%	 		 		 		 		 61%	 		 		 		 		
			Liquid	chlorine	 20%	 		 		 		 		 46%	 		 		 		 		
			Other	 19%	 		 		 		 		 14%	 		 		 		 		
			Cloth	filter	 16%	 		 		 		 		 34%	 		 		 		 		
			None	 16%	 		 		 		 		 1%	 		 		 		 		
			Chlorine	tablets	 13%	 		 		 		 		 38%	 		 		 		 		
			Ceramic	filter	 8%	 		 		 		 		 9%	 		 		 		 		
			Membrane	filter	 7%	 		 		 		 		 22%	 		 		 		 		
			Bio-sand	filter	 1%	 		 		 		 		 12%	 		 		 		 		
			Coagulant/flocculent	 0%	 		 		 		 		 7%	 		 		 		 		
Can	identify	at	least	one	way	to	treat	
water	
83%	 82%	 84%	 71%	 99%	 95%	 96%	 91%	 92%	 100%	
Respondent	gave	permission	for	
enumerator	to	observe	them	getting	a	
cup	of	drinking	water	normally	served	
to	children	
	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Yes	 96%	 		 		 		 		 97%	 		 		 		 		
			No	 3%	 		 		 		 		 2%	 		 		 		 		
			Didn't	have	 1%	 		 		 		 		 1%	 		 		 		 		
(Observed)	Sample	was	collected	safely	 63%	 62%	 65%	 57%	 70%	 83%	 81%	 86%	 74%	 100%	
Source	of	water	sample	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Public	standpipe	 61%	 		 		 72%	 44%	 69%	 		 		 91%	 27%	
			Piped	connection	to	hh	 19%	 		 		 6%	 38%	 28%	 		 		 3%	 73%	
			Protected	dug	well	 8%	 		 		 13%	 0%	 0%	 		 		 0%	 0%	
			Borehole	 2%	 		 		 4%	 0%	 1%	 		 		 2%	 0%	
			Bottled	water	 2%	 		 		 3%	 1%	 1%	 		 		 1%	 0%	
			Rainwater	 2%	 		 		 1%	 0%	 0%	 		 		 0%	 0%	
			Protected	spring	 1%	 		 		 0%	 1%	 0%	 		 		 0%	 0%	
			Tanker	 1%	 		 		 0%	 1%	 0%	 		 		 0%	 0%	
			Unprotected	dug	well	 0%	 		 		 0%	 0%	 0%	 		 		 0%	 0%	
			Unprotected	spring	 0%	 		 		 0%	 0%	 0%	 		 		 0%	 0%
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 12
			Other	 16%	 		 		 0%	 16%	 2%	 		 		 3%	 0%	
(Observed)	Water	container	was	
covered/closed	
81%	 		 		 		 		 95%	 		 		 		 		
(Observed)	Water	container	was	clean	 67%	 		 		 		 		 87%	 		 		 		 		
(Observed)	Water	container	was	out	of	
reach	of	animals	
68%	 		 		 		 		 87%	 		 		 		 		
Water	was	collected	safely	(no	hands)	
and	was	stored	in	a	container	that	was	
clean,	covered,	and	out	of	reach	of	
animals	
44%	 		 		 31%	 62%	 75%	 		 		 65%	 96%	
(Observed)	Type	of	container	used	 		 		 		 		 		 	 		 		 		 		
			Jerry	can	with	lid	 74%	 		 		 		 		 90%	 		 		 		 		
			Jerry	can	 18%	 		 		 		 		 4%	 		 		 		 		
			Bucket	 3%	 		 		 		 		 1%	 		 		 		 		
			Gallon	jug	 2%	 		 		 		 		 1%	 		 		 		 		
			Ceramic	pot	 1%	 		 		 		 		 1%	 		 		 		 		
			Bucket	with	tap	 1%	 		 		 		 		 4%	 		 		 		 		
			Large	drum	 		 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
			Other	 		 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
Respondent	said	they	did	something	to	
make	water	safer	to	drink	
		 		 		 		 		 	 		 		 		 		
			Yes	 58%	 		 		 		 		 64%	 		 		 		 		
			No	 35%	 		 		 		 		 35%	 		 		 		 		
			Do	not	know	 7%	 		 		 		 		 1%	 		 		 		 		
How	respondent	says	they	made	water	
safer	to	drink	(only	respondents	who	
responded	"yes"	to	previous	question)	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Solar	disinfection	 33%	 		 		 		 		 8%	 		 		 		 		
			Boiling	 22%	 		 		 		 		 13%	 		 		 		 		
			Settling	 19%	 		 		 		 		 26%	 		 		 		 		
			Chlorine	tablets	 11%	 		 		 		 		 11%	 		 		 		 		
			Liquid	chlorine	 6%	 		 		 		 		 22%	 		 		 		 		
			Other	 3%	 		 		 		 		 1%	 		 		 		 		
			Ceramic	filter	 3%	 		 		 		 		 1%	 		 		 		 		
			Membrane	filter	 2%	 		 		 		 		 3%
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 13
			Cloth	filter	 1%	 		 		 		 		 5%	 		 		 		 		
			Biosand	filter	 0%	 		 		 		 		 5%	 		 		 		 		
			Coagulent/flocculant	 0%	 		 		 		 		 4%	 		 		 		 		
(Observed,	if	there	is	a	filter)	Filter	is	
assembled	correctly	
83%	 		 		 		 		 100%	 		 		 		 		
(Observed,	if	there	is	a	filter)	Filter	is	
wet	
5%	 		 		 		 		 71%	 		 		 		 		
(Observed,	if	there	is	a	filter)	Filter	is	
clean	
83%	 		 		 		 		 88%	 		 		 		 		
Frequency	that	adult	men	drink	
untreated	water	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Always		 52%	 		 		 50%	 55%	 10%	 		 		 14%	 3%	
			Sometimes	 32%	 		 		 36%	 26%	 37%	 		 		 55%	 1%	
			Never	 16%	 		 		 14%	 19%	 53%	 		 		 32%	 96%	
Frequency	that	adult	women	drink	
untreated	water	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Always		 52%	 		 		 49%	 56%	 9%	 		 		 13%	 0%	
			Sometimes	 32%	 		 		 38%	 25%	 37%	 		 		 56%	 0%	
			Never	 16%	 		 		 13%	 19%	 54%	 		 		 31%	 100%	
Frequency	that	children	drink	untreated	
water	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Always		 52%	 		 		 49%	 57%	 9%	 		 		 13%	 0%	
			Sometimes	 29%	 		 		 41%	 9%	 40%	 		 		 60%	 0%	
			Never	 19%	 		 		 9%	 35%	 51%	 		 		 27%	 100%	
Frequency	that	sick/elderly	drink	
untreated	water	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Always		 47%	 		 		 50%	 41%	 9%	 		 		 13%	 0%	
			Sometimes	 37%	 		 		 41%	 29%	 38%	 		 		 56%	 1%	
			Never	 17%	 		 		 9%	 30%	 53%	 		 		 31%	 99%	
Average	frequency	of	drinking	
untreated	water	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Always		 51%	 		 		 50%	 52%	 9%	 		 		 13%	 1%	
			Sometimes	 34%	 		 		 39%	 22%	 38%	 		 		 57%	 1%	
			Never	 15%	 		 		 11%	 26%	 53%	 		 		 30%	 98%
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 14
When	respondent	says	they	do	not	treat	
water	(multiple	answers	allowed)	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Rainy	season	 28%	 		 		 43%	 7%	 24%	 		 		 32%	 9%	
			Never	 22%	 		 		 5%	 48%	 		 		 		 		 		
			Other	 19%	 		 		 15%	 21%	 12%	 		 		 14%	 9%	
			Dry	season	 16%	 		 		 16%	 17%	 15%	 		 		 19%	 7%	
			Respondent	always	treats	water	 16%	 13%	 28%	 23%	 4%	 42%	 45%	 30%	 28%	 71%	
			When	no	time	 9%	 		 		 4%	 17%	 1%	 		 		 0%	 3%	
			When	no	money	 2%	 		 		 2%	 2%	 18%	 		 		 16%	 20%	
Reasons	respondent	gives	for	not	
treating	water	(multiple	answers	
allowed)	
	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Does	not	know	how	 42%	 44%	 34%	 7%	 50%	 2%	 1%	 5%	 3%	 0%	
			Do	not	have	a	method	to	 41%	 		 		 		 		 3%	 		 		 		 		
			Forgot	 26%	 		 		 		 		 6%	 		 		 		 		
			Bad	taste	 16%	 		 		 		 		 34%	 		 		 		 		
			Other	 12%	 		 		 		 		 28%	 		 		 		 		
			Bad	smell	 12%	 		 		 		 		 31%	 		 		 		 		
			Thinks	water	is	clean	 8%	 		 		 		 		 *	 		 		 		 		
			Requires	too	much	money	 8%	 		 		 		 		 1%	 		 		 		 		
			Requires	too	much	time	 5%	 		 		 		 		 1%	 		 		 		 		
			Broken	 1%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
Reasons	respondent	gives	for	treating	
water	(multiple	answers	allowed)	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Prevents	disease	 75%	 		 		 		 		 87%	 		 		 		 		
			Makes	water	safe	 69%	 		 		 		 		 81%	 		 		 		 		
			Other	 17%	 		 		 		 		 3%	 		 		 		 		
			Free	 2%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
			Someone	told	me	to	 1%	 		 		 		 		 2%
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 15
Sanitation	Practices	
Baseline	 Endline	
Total	
(n=219)	
Female	
(n=186)	
Male	
(n=33)	
Rural	
(n=129)	
Urban	
(n=90)	
Total	
(n=210)	
Female	
(n=158)	
Male	
(n=44)	
Rural	
(n=140)	
Urban	
(n=70)	
Family	owns	latrine	 98%	 		 		 		 		 99%	 		 		 		 		
Who	helped	construct	latrine	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Self	 68%	 		 		 		 		 65%	 		 		 		 		
			Local	authority/Gov't	 27%	 		 		 		 		 25%	 		 		 		 		
			NGO	 3%	 		 		 		 		 16%	 		 		 		 		
			SHG	 1%	 		 		 		 		 2%	 		 		 		 		
			Other	 1%	 		 		 		 		 1%	 		 		 		 		
Type	of	latrine	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Pit	latrine	with	slab	 70%	 		 		 51%	 97%	 48%	 		 		 67%	 9%	
			Pit	latrine	without	slab	 28%	 		 		 48%	 1%	 20%	 		 		 29%	 0%	
			Flush/pour	flush	 1%	 		 		 2%	 0%	 30%	 		 		 1%	 90%	
			Composting	 1%	 		 		 0%	 1%	 1%	 		 		 1%	 1%	
			Latrine	draining	to	canal/creek/river	 1%	 		 		 0%	 1%	 1%	 		 		 1%	 0%	
			Other	 0%	 		 		 0%	 0%	 1%	 		 		 0%	 0%	
Distance	between	latrine	and	house	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Less	than	50m	 88%	 		 		 82%	 97%	 92%	 		 		 87%	 100%	
			More	than	50m	 12%	 		 		 18%	 3%	 8%	 		 		 13%	 0%	
Number	of	families	sharing	latrine	(if	no	
latrine	in	household)	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			2-4	 32%	 		 		 31%	 33%	 36%	 		 		 21%	 45%	
			5-7	 28%	 		 		 52%	 19%	 27%	 		 		 36%	 22%	
			7+	 40%	 		 		 17%	 49%	 37%	 		 		 46%	 33%	
Where	family	members	go	for	
defecation	(if	no	latrine)	
	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Public	latrine	 37%	 		 		 		 		 41%	 		 		 		 		
			Creek/canal/river	 32%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
			Neighbor's	latrine	 11%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
			Other	 11%	 		 		 		 		 45%	 		 		 		 		
			Plastic	bag	 5%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
			Dig	a	hole,	bush/backyard/field	 5%	 		 		 		 		 14%
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 16
	
Main	reason	why	family	cannot	
construct	a	latrine	(if	no	latrine)	
	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Not	a	priority	 56%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
			Defecation	is	not	an	issue	 17%	 		 		 		 		 6%	 		 		 		 		
			Other	 17%	 		 		 		 		 83%	 		 		 		 		
			Too	expensive	 6%	 		 		 		 		 6%	 		 		 		 		
			A	lot	of	space	to	defecate	here	 6%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
			No	space	for	construction	 0%	 		 		 		 		 6%	 		 		 		 		
Disease	Morbidity/Mortality	and	
Management	
Baseline	 Endline	
Total	
(n=219)	
Female	
(n=186)	
Male	
(n=33)	
Rural	
(n=129)	
Urban	
(n=90)	
Total	
(n=210)	
Female	
(n=158)	
Male	
(n=44)	
Rural	
(n=140)	
Urban	
(n=70)	
Someone	in	family	has	had	diarrhea	in	last	
two	weeks	
23%	 		 		 35%	 7%	 10%	 		 		 13%	 2%	
Age	of	family	member	who	had	diarrhea	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			0-5	years	old	 17%	 		 		 		 		 25%	 		 		 		 		
			6-17	years	old	 31%	 		 		 		 		 25%	 		 		 		 		
			18-59	years	old	 42%	 		 		 		 		 50%	 		 		 		 		
			60+	years	old	 10%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
Someone	in	hh	died	within	last	6	months	
due	to	diarrhea	
2%	 		 		 3%	 0%	 1%	 		 		 1%	 0%	
Age	of	member	of	hh	who	died	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			0-5	years	old	 0%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
			6-17	years	old	 25%	 		 		 		 		 100%	 		 		 		 		
			18-59	years	old	 75%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
			60+	years	old	 0%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
Causes	of	diarrhea	named	by	respondents	
(multiple	answers	allowed)	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Dirty	food	 60%	 63%	 47%	 41%	 38%	 76%	 76%	 73%	 67%	 94%	
			Dirty	water	 59%	 60%	 53%	 57%	 63%	 64%	 66%	 59%	 50%	 92%	
			Poor	hygiene	 48%	 49%	 41%	 44%	 54%	 64%	 68%	 48%	 57%	 77%	
			Flies	 47%	 45%	 56%	 40%	 57%	 70%	 68%	 70%	 62%	 84%
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 17
			Germs	 43%	 42%	 47%	 43%	 43%	 50%	 54%	 30%	 31%	 89%	
			Dirty	hands	 39%	 38%	 47%	 34%	 47%	 56%	 58%	 41%	 41%	 87%	
			Open	defecation	 21%	 22%	 16%	 18%	 26%	 45%	 49%	 32%	 26%	 81%	
			Other	 6%	 6%	 6%	 9%	 2%	 3%	 4%	 0%	 5%	 0%	
			Rain	 5%	 3%	 16%	 9%	 0%	 7%	 8%	 2%	 4%	 14%	
			Part	of	child's	growth	 2%	 2%	 3%	 2%	 2%	 5%	 4%	 5%	 2%	 11%	
			Witchcraft	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 1%	 1%	 0%	 0%	 1%	
			Do	not	know	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	
Respondent	correctly	identifies	at	least	
one	cause	of	diarrhea	(dirty	food,	dirty	
water,	flies,	germs,	dirty	hands,	or	open	
defecation)	
92%	 92%	 91%	 89%	 96%	 98%	 98%	 98%	 97%	 100%	
Ways	of	preventing	diarrhea	named	by	
respondents	(multiple	answers	allowed)	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Cover	food	 58%	 54%	 75%	 60%	 54%	 71%	 75%	 52%	 57%	 99%	
			Drink	clean	water	 55%	 54%	 59%	 53%	 57%	 74%	 78%	 57%	 65%	 93%	
			Wash	hands	with	soap	 45%	 47%	 34%	 28%	 69%	 64%	 66%	 52%	 46%	 99%	
			Latrine	use	 44%	 40%	 66%	 47%	 40%	 73%	 71%	 80%	 68%	 84%	
			Prepare	food	properly	(cooking,	washing)	 42%	 42%	 44%	 36%	 50%	 51%	 54%	 34%	 30%	 94%	
			Treat	water	 38%	 35%	 56%	 42%	 33%	 55%	 55%	 48%	 36%	 94%	
			Store	water	safely	 38%	 40%	 28%	 21%	 63%	 60%	 66%	 36%	 41%	 99%	
			No	open	defecation	 30%	 31%	 25%	 22%	 41%	 54%	 58%	 34%	 34%	 94%	
			Prayer	 12%	 12%	 16%	 14%	 10%	 3%	 4%	 0%	 2%	 4%	
			Go	to	traditional	healer	 8%	 8%	 13%	 12%	 2%	 2%	 2%	 0%	 1%	 3%	
			Other	 7%	 8%	 3%	 10%	 2%	 1%	 2%	 0%	 2%	 0%	
			Do	not	know	 1%	 1%	 3%	 2%	 0%	 1%	 1%	 3%	 2%	 0%	
Respondent	correctly	identifies	at	least	
one	way	of	preventing	diarrhea	(cover	
food,	drink	clean	water,	wash	hands	with	
soap,	latrine	use,	prepare	food	properly,	
treat	water,	store	water	safely,	no	open	
defecation)	
98%	 97%	 100%	 96%	 100%	 99%	 98%	 100%	 98%	 100%	
Someone	in	family	has	had	malaria	in	last	
two	weeks	
9%	 		 		 2%	 19%	 3%	 		 		 2%	 3%
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 18
Age	of	family	member	who	had	malaria	 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			0-5	years	old	 16%	 		 		 		 		 25%	 		 		 		 		
			6-17	years	old	 37%	 		 		 		 		 50%	 		 		 		 		
			18-59	years	old	 42%	 		 		 		 		 25%	 		 		 		 		
			60+	years	old	 5%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
Someone	in	family	died	within	last	6	
months	due	to	malaria	
0%	 		 		 		 		 1%	 		 		 1%	 0%	
Age	of	hh	member	who	died	due	to	
malaria	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			0-5	years	old	 0%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
			6-17	years	old	 100%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
			18-59	years	old	 0%	 		 		 		 		 100%	 		 		 		 		
			60+	years	old	 0%	 		 		 		 		 0%	 		 		 		 		
Causes	of	malaria	named	by	respondents	
(multiple	answers	allowed)	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Mosquito	bites	 78%	 78%	 78%	 87%	 64%	 87%	 92%	 77%	 88%	 86%	
			Dirty	water	 44%	 48%	 25%	 22%	 74%	 27%	 31%	 11%	 9%	 63%	
			Rain/water	 21%	 18%	 41%	 35%	 1%	 9%	 9%	 5%	 4%	 19%	
			Sunshine	 17%	 18%	 13%	 10%	 27%	 15%	 18%	 5%	 1%	 43%	
			Dirty	food	 17%	 20%	 3%	 7%	 32%	 15%	 18%	 5%	 2%	 41%	
			Flies	 14%	 16%	 6%	 8%	 23%	 23%	 21%	 30%	 19%	 31%	
			Bush/grasses	 12%	 13%	 6%	 6%	 21%	 26%	 32%	 7%	 9%	 60%	
			Other	 12%	 12%	 9%	 14%	 9%	 2%	 3%	 0%	 4%	 0%	
			Witchcraft	 1%	 2%	 0%	 0%	 3%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	
Ways	of	preventing	malaria	named	by	
respondents	(multiple	answers	allowed)	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		
			Use	of	bednets	 89%	 88%	 97%	 88%	 91%	 90%	 92%	 80%	 89%	 91%	
			Eliminate	mosquito	breeding	site	 72%	 72%	 75%	 77%	 64%	 85%	 91%	 66%	 88%	 86%	
			Use	of	smoke	 39%	 38%	 44%	 35%	 44%	 26%	 27%	 25%	 27%	 24%	
			Proper	hygiene	 37%	 38%	 28%	 26%	 52%	 39%	 40%	 25%	 22%	 71%	
			Not	taking	dirty	water/food	 27%	 31%	 6%	 16%	 44%	 19%	 22%	 2%	 3%	 51%	
			Other	 6%	 7%	 3%	 10%	 1%	 4%	 4%	 2%	 6%	 0%	
			Use	oil/lotion/herbs	on	skin	 1%	 1%	 0%	 0%	 3%	 10%	 11%	 5%	 0%	 30%
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 19
			Stop	witchcraft	 0%	 1%	 0%	 1%	 0%	 1%	 1%	 0%	 0%	 3%	
Respondent	correctly	identifies	at	least	
way	of	preventing	malaria	(using	bednet,	
eliminating	breeding	sites,	use	of	smoke,	
using	oil/lotion/herbs	on	skin)	
95%	 95%	 97%	 93%	 98%	 95%	 97%	 84%	 94%	 97%	
Hand-washing	Practices	
Baseline	 Endline	
Total	
(n=219)	
Female	
(n=186)	
Male	
(n=33)	
Rural	
(n=129)	
Urban	
(n=90)	
Total	
(n=210)	
Female	
(n=158)	
Male	
(n=44)	
Rural	
(n=140)	
Urban	
(n=70)	
Times	that	respondents	say	they	usually	
wash	hands	
		 		 		 		 		 	 		 		 		 		
			Before	eating	 97%	 97%	 94%	 95%	 100%	 90%	 91%	 84%	 86%	 99%	
			After	eating	 88%	 89%	 84%	 80%	 100%	 68%	 72%	 50%	 54%	 97%	
			Before	food	preparation	 79%	 82%	 59%	 80%	 82%	 78%	 83%	 55%	 69%	 93%	
			After	handling	trash	 63%	 63%	 63%	 64%	 62%	 65%	 70%	 41%	 55%	 84%	
			After	latrine	use	 59%	 56%	 75%	 61%	 57%	 88%	 88%	 84%	 82%	 99%	
			After	defecation	 39%	 35%	 59%	 46%	 29%	 60%	 63%	 43%	 43%	 94%	
			Before	feeding	child	 31%	 30%	 34%	 31%	 30%	 47%	 49%	 34%	 31%	 0%	
			After	handling	animals	 19%	 19%	 13%	 28%	 6%	 31%	 31%	 25%	 20%	 54%	
			After	handling	baby's	diaper/feces	 13%	 12%	 19%	 12%	 14%	 37%	 39%	 20%	 19%	 74%	
			Other	 5%	 5%	 3%	 7%	 1%	 6%	 7%	 5%	 9%	 0%	
What	respondents	say	they	usually	use	
when	washing	hands	
	 		 		 		 		 	 		 		 		 		
			Water	only	 61%	 66%	 32%	 58%	 66%	 10%	 12%	 7%	 15%	 1%	
			Water	and	soap	 36%	 32%	 58%	 37%	 34%	 76%	 75%	 80%	 69%	 91%	
			Water	and	ash	 3%	 2%	 10%	 6%	 0%	 13%	 13%	 12%	 16%	 7%	
			Water	and	sand/leaves	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	
			Other	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	
Main	factor	that	prevents	family	from	
using	soap	(only	respondents	who	said	
they	don't	use	soap)	
	 		 		 		 		 	 		 		 		 		
			Not	a	common	practice	here	 44%	 45%	 30%	 41%	 48%	 27%	 30%	 18%	 32%	 0%	
			Negligence/laziness	 30%	 30%	 30%	 25%	 36%	 40%	 38%	 55%	 45%	 13%
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 20
			Too	expensive	 8%	 6%	 30%	 14%	 0%	 13%	 15%	 9%	 14%	 13%	
			Water	alone	cleanses	the	hands	 8%	 9%	 0%	 3%	 16%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	 0%	
			Other	 5%	 5%	 0%	 8%	 0%	 17%	 15%	 18%	 9%	 63%	
			Takes	time	 5%	 4%	 10%	 8%	 0%	 2%	 3%	 0%	 0%	 13%	
(Observed)	House	has	a	hand-washing	
facility	
	 		 		 		 		 	 		 		 		 		
			No	 61%	 		 		 65%	 57%	 16%	 		 		 22%	 2%	
			Water	and	soap	at	hand-washing	area	 16%	 		 		 13%	 20%	 40%	 		 		 36%	 48%	
			Only	water	(no	soap)	at	hand-washing	
area	
12%	 		 		 14%	 9%	 2%	 		 		 1%	 3%	
			Water	and	soap	in	or	near	latrine	 7%	 		 		 4%	 11%	 41%	 		 		 38%	 47%	
			Only	water	(no	soap)	in	or	near	latrine	 4%	 		 		 4%	 3%	 2%	 		 		 1%	 0%	
Soap	is	present	in	household	(water	and	
soap	at	hand-washing	area	or	near	
latrine)	
23%	 		 		 17%	 31%	 81%	 		 		 74%	 95%
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 21
Appendix C: Survey Instrument (Questionnaire)
	 SuSurvey	 	
	
		
	
Post	Office	Box	540318	|	Orlando,	FL	32854	|	407.716.4214	|	www.waterIslifeinternational.org	
	
KAP	Survey	on	WaSH	and	Household	Water	Treatment	Methods	
	
INFORMED	CONSENT	
	
Good	morning/good	afternoon.		My	name	is	__________________.		I	am	part	of	a	team	of	people	who	
are	assessing	water	practices	in	your	community.		Our	team	will	be	interviewing	different	
households	in	your	area.		Your	local	leaders	have	granted	us	permission	to	conduct	this	study,	
and	your	house	has	been	randomly	selected	to	participate.		You	have	been	asked	to	participate	
in	this	study	because	your	personal	views	and	experiences	as	a	community	member	are	
important	to	us.		If	you	participate,	I	will	ask	you	questions	about	your	drinking	water	and	
water	use	habits.		The	interview	will	take	approximately	30	minutes.		No	one	except	me	will	
know	that	it	was	you	who	answered	these	questions.		Would	you	like	to	participate?	
	
A	 Interviewer	 	
B	 Survey	Number	 	
C	 Date	 	
D	 Time	 	
E	 Location	(Woreda,	Kebele,	Sub	City,	Village)	 	
	
	
Section	1:		HOUSEHOLD	DEMOGRAPHICS	
1.	 Gender	of	the	respondent	 1[		]	Female		 2[		]	Male	
2.	 What	is	your	marital	status?	 1[		]	Single	 2[		]	Married	
3[		]	Separated/Divorced	 4[		]	Widow/er	
3.	 How	old	are	you	now?	 ________	years	
4.	 Age	bracket	of	the	respondent	 1[		]	12-17	yo	 2[		]	18-40	yo	
3[		]	41-59	yo	 4[		]	60	yo	and	above	
5.	 Who	is	the	respondent?	(relationship	within	
the	household)	
1[		]	Wife	 2[		]	Husband	
3[		]	Daughter	 4[		]	Son	
5[		]	Grandparent	 6[		]	Other:	
6.	 How	many	people	are	living	in	the	household?	 	
________	people	
	 Age	Bracket	 Male	 Female	 Total	
7.	 0	–	5	years	old	 	 	 	
8.	 6	–	17	years	old	 	 	 	
9.	 18	–	59	years	old	 	 	 	
10.	 60+	years	old	 	 	 	
11.		 Can	the	male	head	of	household	read?	 1[		]	Yes	 2[		]	No	
12.	 Can	the	female	head	of	household	read?	 1[		]	Yes	 2[		]	No	
13.	 What	is	your	educational	background?	 1[		]	Can’t	read/write	 2[		]	1	–	6	years	
3[		]	7	–	9	years	 4[		]	10	–	12	years	
5[		]	College	and	above	 	
	
	
Section	2:		HOUSEHOLD	WATER	SUPPLY	AND	PRACTICES	
14.	 Who	usually	collects	water	for	the	family?	 1[		]	Adult	men	 2[		]	Boys	 3[		]	Delivered	
4[		]	Adult	women	 5[		]	Girls	 6[		]	Other:	
15.	 How	far	from	your	dwelling	is	the	source	of	 1[		]	within	500	m	 2[		]	500m	–	1km
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 22
	 SuSurvey	 	
	
		
	
Post	Office	Box	540318	|	Orlando,	FL	32854	|	407.716.4214	|	www.waterIslifeinternational.org	
	
your	drinking	water?	 3[		]	1km	–	3	km	 4[		]	More	than	3	km	
16.	 How	many	minutes	do	you	spend	collecting	
water	from	the	source	(round-trip)?	
1[		]	within	30	mins	 2[		]	30	mins	–	1	hour	
3[		]	1	hour	–	2	hours	 4[		]	More	than	2	hours	
17.	 How	many	large	jerry	cans	of	water	are	
collected	each	day	for	the	entire	household?	
(Jerry	can=20	L)	
1[		]	1	jerry	can	 2[		]	2	jerry	cans	
2[		]	3	–	4	jerry	cans	 4[		]	more	than	4	jerry	
cans	
	
Section	3:		HOUSEHOLD	WATER	TREATMENT	AND	STORAGE	
18.	 Can	you	tell	me	all	the	ways	you	know	to	
make	water	safe	to	drink	in	your	home?	
(Multiple	answer,	ask	“Any	others?”)	
1[		]	Boiling	 2[		]	Settling	 3[		]	Solar	
disinfection	
4[		]Chlorine	
tablets	
5[		]	Membrane	
filter	
6[		]	Ceramic	
filter	
7[		]	Liquid	
Chlorine	
8[		]	Biosand	
filter	
9[		]Coagulant/	
flocculent	
10[		]	Cloth	filter	 11[		]	None	 12[		]	Other:	
19.	 May	I	observe	you	giving	me	a	cup	of	your	
current	drinking	water	for	children	from	this	
household?	
1[		]	Yes	 2[		]	No	
3[		]	Do	not	have	
20.			 OBSERVE:	Was	sample	collected	safely	(not	
touching	water	with	hands)?	
1[		]	Yes	 2[		]	No	
21.	 What	source	did	this	water	come	from?	 1[		]	Piped	
connection	in	hh	
2[		]	Public	
standpipe	
3[		]	Protected	
dug	well	
4[		]	Borehole	 5[		]	Rainwater	 6[		]	Tanker	
7[		]	Protected	
spring	
8[		]	Unprotected	
dug	well	
9[		]	Bottled	
water	
10[		]	
Unprotected	
spring	
11[		]	Other:	
22.	 OBSERVE:		Is	the	container	covered/closed?	 1[		]	Yes	 2[		]	No	
23.	 OBSERVE:		Is	the	container	clean?	 1[		]	Yes	 2[		]	No	
24.	 OBSERVE:		Is	the	container	out	of	reach	of	
animals?	
1[		]	Yes	 2[		]	No	
25.	 OBSERVE:		What	container	is	used	for	
drinking	water?	
1[		]	Bucket	 2[		]	Jerry	can	
3[		]	Jerry	can	with	lid	 4[		]	Gallon	jug	
5[		]	Bucket	with	tap	 6[		]	Ceramic	pot	
7[		]	Large	drum	 8[		]	Other:	
26.	 Did	you	do	anything	to	make	the	water	safer	
to	drink?	
1[		]	Yes	 2[		]	No	(if	NO,	proceed	to	Q31)	
3[		]	Do	not	know	
27.	 How	did	you	make	this	water	safer	to	drink?	 1[		]	Boiling	 2[		]	Settling	 3[		]	Solar	
disinfection	
4[		]Chlorine	
tablets	
5[		]	Membrane	
filter	
6[		]	Ceramic	
filter	
7[		]	Liquid	
Chlorine	
8[		]	Biosand	
filter	
9[		]Coagulant/	
flocculent	
10[		]	Cloth	filter	 11[		]	Other:	
28.	 If	filter,	OBSERVE:		is	the	filter	assembled	
correctly?	
1[		]	Yes	 2[		]	No	
29.	 If	filter,	OBSERVE:		is	the	filter	wet?	 1[		]	Yes	 2[		]	No
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 23
	 SuSurvey	 	
	
		
	
Post	Office	Box	540318	|	Orlando,	FL	32854	|	407.716.4214	|	www.waterIslifeinternational.org	
	
30.	 If	filter,	OBSERVE:		is	the	filter	clean?	 1[		]	Yes	 2[		]	No	
	 How	often	do:	 	 	
31.	 -adult	men	drink	untreated	water?	 1[		]	Always	 2[		]	Sometimes	 3[		]	Never	
32.	 -adult	women	drink	untreated	water?	 1[		]	Always	 2[		]	Sometimes	 3[		]	Never	
33.	 -children	drink	untreated	water?	 1[		]	Always	 2[		]	Sometimes	 3[		]	Never	
34.	 -sick/elderly	drink	untreated	water?	 1[		]	Always	 2[		]	Sometimes	 3[		]	Never	
35.	 When	do	you	NOT	treat	your	water?	
(multiple	answers	allowed)	
1[		]	Dry	season	 2[		]	Rainy	season	 3[		]	When	no	
money	
4[		]	When	no	
time	
5[		]	I	always	
treat	water	
6[		]	Other:	
36.	 Why	do	you	NOT	treat	your	water?	
(multiple	answers	allowed)	
1[		]	Bad	taste	 2[		]	Bad	smell	 3[		]	Forgot	
4[		]	Requires	
too	much	money	
5[		]	Do	not	know	
how	
6[		]	Takes	too	
much	time	
7[		]	Broken	 8[		]	Do	not	have	
a	method	to	
9[		]	Other:	
37.	 Why	do	you	treat	your	water?	
(multiple	answers	allowed)	
1[		]	Makes	
water	safe	
2[		]	Prevents	
disease	
3[		]	Someone	
told	me	to	
4[		]	Free	 5[		]	Other:	
	
Section	4:		SANITATION	PRACTICES	
38.	 Does	your	family	own	a	latrine?	 1[		]	Yes	 2[		]	No	(if	NO,	proceed	to	Q42)	
39.	 If	YES,	who	helped	you	construct	the	latrine?	 1[		]	Self	 2[		]	Local	authority/Govt	
3[		]	NGO	 4[		]	SHG	
5[		]	Other:	
40.	 If	YES,	which	type	of	latrine	do	you	have?	 1[		]	Flush/pour	flush	 2[		]	Composting	latrine	
3[		]	Pit	latrine	with	slab	 4[		]	Pit	latrine	without	slab	
5[		]	Latrine	draining	to	
canal/creek/river	
6[		]	Other:	
41.	 If	YES,	how	far	is	the	latrine	from	your	house?		
(Then,	proceed	to	Q45)	
1[		]	Within	50	
meters	
2[		]	More	than	50	meters	
42.	 If	sharing	latrine	with	others,	how	many	
families	are	sharing?	
1[		]	2-4	families	 2[		]	5-7	families	
3[		]	More	than	7	families	
43.	 If	NO	latrine,	where	do	your	family	members	
go	for	defecation?	(Tick	the	one	that	the	family	
usually	practices)	
1[		]	Neighbor’s	latrine	 2[		]	Public	latrine	
3[		]	Plastic	bag	 4[		]	Dig	a	hole	
4[		]	Bush/backyard/field	 5[		]	Creek/canal/river	
6[		]	Other:	
44.	 If	NO	latrine,	what	could	be	the	MAIN	reason	
why	your	family	cannot	construct	a	latrine?	
(Tick	the	one	main	reason)	
1[		]	Too	expensive	 2[		]	Not	a	priority	
3[		]	No	space	for	
construction	
4[		]	A	lot	of	space	to	
defecate	here	
5[		]	Defecation	is	not	an	
issue	
6[		]	Other:	
	
Section	5:		DISEASE	MORBIDITY/MORTALITY	AND	MANAGEMENT	
45.	 In	the	last	2	weeks,	has	anyone	in	your	family	
had	diarrhea?	(Note	that	diarrhea	is	defined	as	
the	passing	of	stool	3	times	or	more	in	24	hours	
whether	it	is	watery,	bloody,	mucoid,	or	water-
1[		]	Yes	 2	[		]	No	(If	no,	go	straight	
to	Q47)
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 24
	 SuSurvey	 	
	
		
	
Post	Office	Box	540318	|	Orlando,	FL	32854	|	407.716.4214	|	www.waterIslifeinternational.org	
	
wash	like)	
46.	 If	YES,	how	old	is	the	family	member	who	had	
diarrhea?	___________	
1[		]	0-5	years	old	 2[		]	6-17	years	old	
3[		]	18-59	years	old	 4[		]	60	and	above	
47.	 Has	anyone	in	your	household	died	due	to	
diarrhea	for	the	last	6	months?	
1[		]	Yes	 2[		]	No	(If	no,	proceed	to	
Q49)	
48.	 If	YES,	how	old	was	that	member	of	the	
household?	__________	
1[		]	0-5	years	old	 2[		]	6-17	years	old	
3[		]	18-59	years	old	 4[		]	60	and	above	
49.	 What	do	you	think	can	be	the	cause	of	
diarrhea?	(Tick	all	that	the	respondent	
mentions	but	do	not	influence	his/her	response)	
1[		]	Rain	 2[		]	Dirty	hands	 3[		]	Witchcraft	
4[		]	Flies	 5[		]	Dirty	food	 6[		]	Dirty	water	
7[		]	Germs	 8[		]	Part	of	
child’s	growth	
9[		]	Poor	
hygiene	
10[		]	Open	
defecation	
11[		]	Do	not	
know	
12[		]	Other:	
50.	 How	do	you	think	diarrhea	can	be	prevented?	
(Tick	all	that	the	respondent	mentions	but	
never	influence	his/her	responses)	
1[		]	Prayer	 2[		]	Latrine	use	 3[		]	Treat	water	
4[		]	Do	not	
know	
5[		]	Covering	
food	
6[		]	Drink	clean	
water	
7[		]	No	open	
defecation	
8[		]	Store	water	
safely	
9[		]	Wash	hands	
with	soap	
10[		]	Prepare	
food	properly	
(cooking,	
washing)	
11[		]	Go	to	
traditional	
healer	
12:		Other:	
51.	 In	the	last	2	weeks,	has	anyone	in	your	family	
had	malaria?	
1[		]	Yes	 2	[		]	No	(If	no,	go	straight	
to	Q53)	
52.	 If	YES,	how	old	is	the	family	member	who	had	
malaria?	___________	
1[		]	0-5	years	old	 2[		]	6-17	years	old	
3[		]	18-59	years	old	 4[		]	60	and	above	
53.	 Has	anyone	in	your	household	died	due	to	
malaria	for	the	last	6	months?	
1[		]	Yes	 2[		]	No	(If	no,	proceed	to	
Q55)	
54.	 If	YES,	how	old	was	that	member	of	the	
household?	__________	
1[		]	0-5	years	old	 2[		]	6-17	years	old	
3[		]	18-59	years	old	 4[		]	60	and	above	
55.	 What	do	you	think	is	the	cause	of	malaria?	
(Tick	all	that	the	respondent	mentions	but	do	
not	influence)	
1[		]	Rain/water	 2[		]	Sunshine	 3[		]	Witchcraft	
4[		]	Flies	 5[		]	Dirty	food	 6[		]	Dirty	water	
7[		]	Mosquito	
bites	
8[		]	Bush/	
grasses	
9[		]	Other:	
56.	 What	do	you	think	is	the	best	way	to	protect	
yourself	from	malaria?	(Tick	all	that	the	
respondent	mentions	but	never	influence	
his/her	responses)	
1[		]	Proper	
hygiene	
2[		]	Use	of	
smoke	
3[		]	Stop	
witchcraft	
4[		]	Use	oil/	
lotion/herbs	on	
skin	
5[		]	Not	taking	
dirty	
water/food	
6[		]	Eliminate	
mosquito	
breeding	site	
7[		]	Use	of	bed	
nets	
8[		]	Other:	
	
	
Section	6:		HANDWASHING	PRACTICES	
57.	 Please	tell	me	the	times	you	usually	wash	your	
hands?	(ONLY	tick	what	the	respondent	says.)	
1[		]	Before	
eating	
2[		]	After	
latrine	use	
3[		]	Before	
feeding	child	
4[		]	After	eating	 5[		]	After	
defecation	
6[		]	After	
handling	trash	
7[		]	Before	food	 8[		]	After	 9[		]	After
iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 25
	 SuSurvey	 	
	
		
	
Post	Office	Box	540318	|	Orlando,	FL	32854	|	407.716.4214	|	www.waterIslifeinternational.org	
	
preparation	 handling	baby’s	
diaper/feces	
handling	
animals	
10[		]	Other:	
58.	 What	do	you	usually	use	in	washing	hands?	
(Tick	the	most	commonly	practiced)	
1[		]	Water	only	 2[		]	Water	
and	soap	
3[		]	Water	and	
sand/leaves	
4[		]	Water	and	ash	 5[		]	Other:	
59.	 If	the	answer	is	1	(water	only),	What	is	the	
MAIN	factor	that	prevents	your	family	from	
using	soap?	
1[		]	Washing	with	soap	
takes	time	
2[		]	Soap	is	not	a	
common	practice	here	
3[		]	Negligence/laziness	 4[		]	Too	expensive	
5[		]	Water	alone	cleanses	
the	hand	
6[		]	Other:	
60.	 OBSERVATION	ONLY:		Is	there	any	hand	
washing	facility	available	around	the	home?	
1[		]	There	are	water	and	
soap	near	or	within	the	
latrine	
2[		]	There	is	ONLY	water	
near	or	within	the	latrine	
3[		]	There	are	water	and	
soap	at	a	designated	hand	
washing	area	
4[		]	There	is	ONLY	water	
at	a	designated	hand	
washing	area	
5[		]	There	is	no	available	washing	station	
	
NOTES:	
ü Review	the	questionnaire	
ü Ensure	that	you	did	not	skip/forget	any	of	the	required	fields	
ü Thank	the	respondent	for	this/her	participation

More Related Content

What's hot

Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2
Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2
Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2Meshack Lomoywara
 
Lfa Logical Framework Analysis
Lfa   Logical Framework AnalysisLfa   Logical Framework Analysis
Lfa Logical Framework AnalysisJFM Lohith Shetty
 
An introduction to the sustainable livelihoods framework
An introduction to the sustainable livelihoods frameworkAn introduction to the sustainable livelihoods framework
An introduction to the sustainable livelihoods frameworkafrica-rising
 
Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
Monitoring and Evaluation FrameworkMonitoring and Evaluation Framework
Monitoring and Evaluation FrameworkMichelle Joja
 
Training workshop on project cycle management
Training workshop on project cycle management Training workshop on project cycle management
Training workshop on project cycle management mohamed osama hussein
 
How to Write a Concept Note
How to Write a Concept NoteHow to Write a Concept Note
How to Write a Concept NoteFUNDSFORNGOS.ORG
 
Project management cycle
Project management  cycleProject management  cycle
Project management cycleMegha BHardwaj
 
Monitoring and evaluation (2)
Monitoring and evaluation (2)Monitoring and evaluation (2)
Monitoring and evaluation (2)Dr.RAJEEV KASHYAP
 
Sanitation and hygiene sector trends
Sanitation and hygiene sector trendsSanitation and hygiene sector trends
Sanitation and hygiene sector trendsIRC
 
Corporate Water Stewardship 101
Corporate Water Stewardship 101Corporate Water Stewardship 101
Corporate Water Stewardship 101Antea Group
 
7 M&E: Indicators
7 M&E: Indicators7 M&E: Indicators
7 M&E: IndicatorsTony
 
Project Planning and Management Notes
Project Planning and Management NotesProject Planning and Management Notes
Project Planning and Management NotesHaris Hassan
 
Monitoring and evaluation presentatios
Monitoring and evaluation presentatios Monitoring and evaluation presentatios
Monitoring and evaluation presentatios athanzeer
 
Sustainable livelihood framework and asset pentagon
Sustainable livelihood  framework and asset pentagonSustainable livelihood  framework and asset pentagon
Sustainable livelihood framework and asset pentagonShawkat Ara Begum
 

What's hot (20)

Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2
Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2
Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2
 
Monitoring & Evaluation Framework - Fiinovation
Monitoring & Evaluation Framework - FiinovationMonitoring & Evaluation Framework - Fiinovation
Monitoring & Evaluation Framework - Fiinovation
 
Lfa Logical Framework Analysis
Lfa   Logical Framework AnalysisLfa   Logical Framework Analysis
Lfa Logical Framework Analysis
 
An introduction to the sustainable livelihoods framework
An introduction to the sustainable livelihoods frameworkAn introduction to the sustainable livelihoods framework
An introduction to the sustainable livelihoods framework
 
Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
Monitoring and Evaluation FrameworkMonitoring and Evaluation Framework
Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
 
Training workshop on project cycle management
Training workshop on project cycle management Training workshop on project cycle management
Training workshop on project cycle management
 
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and EvaluationMonitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation
 
Program planning
Program planningProgram planning
Program planning
 
How to Write a Concept Note
How to Write a Concept NoteHow to Write a Concept Note
How to Write a Concept Note
 
Project evaluation
Project evaluationProject evaluation
Project evaluation
 
Project management cycle
Project management  cycleProject management  cycle
Project management cycle
 
Monitoring and evaluation (2)
Monitoring and evaluation (2)Monitoring and evaluation (2)
Monitoring and evaluation (2)
 
Sanitation and hygiene sector trends
Sanitation and hygiene sector trendsSanitation and hygiene sector trends
Sanitation and hygiene sector trends
 
Corporate Water Stewardship 101
Corporate Water Stewardship 101Corporate Water Stewardship 101
Corporate Water Stewardship 101
 
Logical framework
Logical  frameworkLogical  framework
Logical framework
 
7 M&E: Indicators
7 M&E: Indicators7 M&E: Indicators
7 M&E: Indicators
 
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation
 
Project Planning and Management Notes
Project Planning and Management NotesProject Planning and Management Notes
Project Planning and Management Notes
 
Monitoring and evaluation presentatios
Monitoring and evaluation presentatios Monitoring and evaluation presentatios
Monitoring and evaluation presentatios
 
Sustainable livelihood framework and asset pentagon
Sustainable livelihood  framework and asset pentagonSustainable livelihood  framework and asset pentagon
Sustainable livelihood framework and asset pentagon
 

Similar to Endline Report

Access and Behavioral Outcome Indicators for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
Access and Behavioral Outcome Indicators for Water, Sanitation, and HygieneAccess and Behavioral Outcome Indicators for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
Access and Behavioral Outcome Indicators for Water, Sanitation, and HygieneAED
 
How can we reduce open defecation in rural India?
How can we reduce open defecation in rural India?How can we reduce open defecation in rural India?
How can we reduce open defecation in rural India?Yogesh Upadhyaya
 
Sanitation Attitudes of Urban Dwellers and their Influence on Sanitation Prac...
Sanitation Attitudes of Urban Dwellers and their Influence on Sanitation Prac...Sanitation Attitudes of Urban Dwellers and their Influence on Sanitation Prac...
Sanitation Attitudes of Urban Dwellers and their Influence on Sanitation Prac...Premier Publishers
 
Swachch bharat
Swachch bharatSwachch bharat
Swachch bharatOpenSpace
 
Emerging experiences with sanitation financing models & approaches, in lao pdr
Emerging experiences with sanitation financing models & approaches, in lao pdrEmerging experiences with sanitation financing models & approaches, in lao pdr
Emerging experiences with sanitation financing models & approaches, in lao pdrDeclan O'Leary
 
Wsp gender-water-sanitation(3)
Wsp gender-water-sanitation(3)Wsp gender-water-sanitation(3)
Wsp gender-water-sanitation(3)Dr Lendy Spires
 
WATER AND SANITATION PROGRAM
WATER AND SANITATION PROGRAMWATER AND SANITATION PROGRAM
WATER AND SANITATION PROGRAMDr Lendy Spires
 
Kap report endline september 2012
Kap report endline september 2012 Kap report endline september 2012
Kap report endline september 2012 Openo TVET College
 
Klickitat County Community Health Needs Assessment Data and Findings Septem...
Klickitat County Community Health Needs Assessment Data and Findings Septem...Klickitat County Community Health Needs Assessment Data and Findings Septem...
Klickitat County Community Health Needs Assessment Data and Findings Septem...healthypeoplealliance
 
Prof. Vibhuti Patel How inclusive is the eleventh five year plan a sectoral r...
Prof. Vibhuti Patel How inclusive is the eleventh five year plan a sectoral r...Prof. Vibhuti Patel How inclusive is the eleventh five year plan a sectoral r...
Prof. Vibhuti Patel How inclusive is the eleventh five year plan a sectoral r...VIBHUTI PATEL
 
Smile latrine project baseline survey report rationale for sanitation interv...
Smile latrine project baseline survey report  rationale for sanitation interv...Smile latrine project baseline survey report  rationale for sanitation interv...
Smile latrine project baseline survey report rationale for sanitation interv...Javan Okello
 
Ministerial Presentations SWA 2016 Ministerial Meeting , Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Ministerial Presentations SWA 2016 Ministerial Meeting , Addis Ababa, EthiopiaMinisterial Presentations SWA 2016 Ministerial Meeting , Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Ministerial Presentations SWA 2016 Ministerial Meeting , Addis Ababa, EthiopiaFiorella Polo
 
Status of Sanitation and Hygienic Conditions in Urban Communities in Gomoa Ea...
Status of Sanitation and Hygienic Conditions in Urban Communities in Gomoa Ea...Status of Sanitation and Hygienic Conditions in Urban Communities in Gomoa Ea...
Status of Sanitation and Hygienic Conditions in Urban Communities in Gomoa Ea...Premier Publishers
 
RMPA conference poster
RMPA conference poster RMPA conference poster
RMPA conference poster Zac Peterson
 
Scope of Rapid Action Learning to combat Public health hazards in India
Scope of Rapid Action Learning to combat Public health hazards in IndiaScope of Rapid Action Learning to combat Public health hazards in India
Scope of Rapid Action Learning to combat Public health hazards in IndiaMd Ehtesham
 
High Five program: final report (2011-2014)
High Five program: final report (2011-2014)High Five program: final report (2011-2014)
High Five program: final report (2011-2014)abby ati
 
Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 update
Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 updateProgress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 update
Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 updateUNICEF Publications
 
6. Existing Local Health Data Systems: a summary of the pre-event survey of p...
6. Existing Local Health Data Systems: a summary of the pre-event survey of p...6. Existing Local Health Data Systems: a summary of the pre-event survey of p...
6. Existing Local Health Data Systems: a summary of the pre-event survey of p...Institute of Public Health in Ireland
 

Similar to Endline Report (20)

Access and Behavioral Outcome Indicators for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
Access and Behavioral Outcome Indicators for Water, Sanitation, and HygieneAccess and Behavioral Outcome Indicators for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
Access and Behavioral Outcome Indicators for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
 
How can we reduce open defecation in rural India?
How can we reduce open defecation in rural India?How can we reduce open defecation in rural India?
How can we reduce open defecation in rural India?
 
Sanitation Attitudes of Urban Dwellers and their Influence on Sanitation Prac...
Sanitation Attitudes of Urban Dwellers and their Influence on Sanitation Prac...Sanitation Attitudes of Urban Dwellers and their Influence on Sanitation Prac...
Sanitation Attitudes of Urban Dwellers and their Influence on Sanitation Prac...
 
Swachch bharat
Swachch bharatSwachch bharat
Swachch bharat
 
Emerging experiences with sanitation financing models & approaches, in lao pdr
Emerging experiences with sanitation financing models & approaches, in lao pdrEmerging experiences with sanitation financing models & approaches, in lao pdr
Emerging experiences with sanitation financing models & approaches, in lao pdr
 
Wsp gender-water-sanitation(3)
Wsp gender-water-sanitation(3)Wsp gender-water-sanitation(3)
Wsp gender-water-sanitation(3)
 
WATER AND SANITATION PROGRAM
WATER AND SANITATION PROGRAMWATER AND SANITATION PROGRAM
WATER AND SANITATION PROGRAM
 
Kap report endline september 2012
Kap report endline september 2012 Kap report endline september 2012
Kap report endline september 2012
 
Klickitat County Community Health Needs Assessment Data and Findings Septem...
Klickitat County Community Health Needs Assessment Data and Findings Septem...Klickitat County Community Health Needs Assessment Data and Findings Septem...
Klickitat County Community Health Needs Assessment Data and Findings Septem...
 
Prof. Vibhuti Patel How inclusive is the eleventh five year plan a sectoral r...
Prof. Vibhuti Patel How inclusive is the eleventh five year plan a sectoral r...Prof. Vibhuti Patel How inclusive is the eleventh five year plan a sectoral r...
Prof. Vibhuti Patel How inclusive is the eleventh five year plan a sectoral r...
 
Smile latrine project baseline survey report rationale for sanitation interv...
Smile latrine project baseline survey report  rationale for sanitation interv...Smile latrine project baseline survey report  rationale for sanitation interv...
Smile latrine project baseline survey report rationale for sanitation interv...
 
Ministerial Presentations SWA 2016 Ministerial Meeting , Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Ministerial Presentations SWA 2016 Ministerial Meeting , Addis Ababa, EthiopiaMinisterial Presentations SWA 2016 Ministerial Meeting , Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Ministerial Presentations SWA 2016 Ministerial Meeting , Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
 
Diarrhea prevention and management
Diarrhea prevention and management Diarrhea prevention and management
Diarrhea prevention and management
 
Social and Therapeutic Horticulture: The State of Practice in the United Kingdom
Social and Therapeutic Horticulture: The State of Practice in the United KingdomSocial and Therapeutic Horticulture: The State of Practice in the United Kingdom
Social and Therapeutic Horticulture: The State of Practice in the United Kingdom
 
Status of Sanitation and Hygienic Conditions in Urban Communities in Gomoa Ea...
Status of Sanitation and Hygienic Conditions in Urban Communities in Gomoa Ea...Status of Sanitation and Hygienic Conditions in Urban Communities in Gomoa Ea...
Status of Sanitation and Hygienic Conditions in Urban Communities in Gomoa Ea...
 
RMPA conference poster
RMPA conference poster RMPA conference poster
RMPA conference poster
 
Scope of Rapid Action Learning to combat Public health hazards in India
Scope of Rapid Action Learning to combat Public health hazards in IndiaScope of Rapid Action Learning to combat Public health hazards in India
Scope of Rapid Action Learning to combat Public health hazards in India
 
High Five program: final report (2011-2014)
High Five program: final report (2011-2014)High Five program: final report (2011-2014)
High Five program: final report (2011-2014)
 
Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 update
Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 updateProgress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 update
Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 update
 
6. Existing Local Health Data Systems: a summary of the pre-event survey of p...
6. Existing Local Health Data Systems: a summary of the pre-event survey of p...6. Existing Local Health Data Systems: a summary of the pre-event survey of p...
6. Existing Local Health Data Systems: a summary of the pre-event survey of p...
 

Endline Report

  • 1. Water is Life International Wa(SHG) Pilot Program Endline Survey Report March 2016 Report prepared by Elizabeth Poulsen | elizabeth.ann.poulsen@gmail.com Wa(SHG) Project Manager: Stephenie Chatfield | stephenie.chatfield@waterislifeinternational.com WiLi Executive Director: David Harding | david.harding@waterislifeinternational.com Water is Life, International (WiLi) | P.O. Box 540318 | Orlando, FL 32854 | (407) 716-4214
  • 2. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | ii Table of Contents Introduction.......................................................................................................................................1 Methodology......................................................................................................................................1 Limitations.................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary of Results ......................................................................................................................... 2 Demographic Information about Survey Respondents ............................................................... 2 Personal Sanitation....................................................................................................................... 2 Water Treatment Knowledge and Practices............................................................................. 3 Hand-Washing Knowledge and Practices ................................................................................ 3 Incidence of Diarrheal Disease..................................................................................................... 4 Latrine Ownership........................................................................................................................ 5 Recommendations............................................................................................................................ 5 Conclusions....................................................................................................................................... 5 Appendix A: Program Logical Framework ...................................................................................... 6 Appendix B: Complete Baseline and Endline Survey Data ............................................................. 9 Appendix C: Survey Instrument (Questionnaire)...........................................................................21 Acronyms CLA Cluster-Level Association KAP Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices SHG Self-Help Group WaSH Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Wa(SHG) Wili’s Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Self-Help Group Program WiLi Water is Life, International
  • 3. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 1 Introduction More than 70 percent of Ethiopia’s population lives without improved sanitation coverage. This, coupled with poor sanitation behaviors, contributes to a high prevalence of water-borne disease which disproportionately affects rural populations. Water is Life, International (Wili) aims to address this health burden through their Wa(SHG) program, which focuses primarily on changing personal sanitation and hygiene behaviors, with a secondary focus on providing bio-sand water filters. Wili’s interventions will primarily be implemented to and through an existing network of Self-Help Groups (SHGs), organized by Cluster-Level Associations (CLAs). Partner organizations for the Wa(SHG) program include Tearfund, Ethiopian Kale Heywet Church, Ethiopian Guenet Church, Desert Rose Consultancy, and the Ethiopian Kale Heywet Church WET Center. Wili conducted a pilot phase of the Wa(SHG) program from March 2015-February 2016 in the Dale and Shebedino Districts of the Awasa township in southern Ethiopia (see Figure 1). The overall goal of this pilot phase was to test the effectiveness of the Wa(SHG) program, with a focus on improving personal hygiene behaviors, alleviating the burden of water-borne diseases, and improving the basic sanitation of program participants. A number of tools will assess whether this pilot phase was successful; this report details the data uncovered through baseline and endline KAP (knowledge, attitudes, and practices) surveys. Figure 1: The Wa(SHG) project took place in the Dale and Shebedino districts of the Awasa township in southern Ethiopia. (Image sources: commons.wikimedia.org, forecedmigration.org) Methodology The KAP surveys were designed to measure the overall project goal, as well as one of the project’s four objectives; the full list of objectives are detailed in the program’s logical framework, in Appendix A. This goal and objective (and their corresponding indicators) that this report will discuss are as follows: Program Goal/Impact: To test the implementation of a participatory WaSH training program through the SHG network in order to improve personal hygiene behaviors, alleviate the burden of water-borne diseases, and to improve the basic sanitation of individuals in Ethiopia. Indicator 1: Personal sanitation behaviors
  • 4. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 2 Indicator 2: Incidence of diarrheal disease Indicator 3: SHG members that have latrines Program Objective 2: SHG members have an increased level of awareness and knowledge of personal WaSH issues Indicator 2.1: Knowledge of critical hand-washing times Indicator 2.2: Awareness of disease-transmission and basic hygiene practices A total of 219 baseline and 210 endline KAP surveys were conducted, representing about 20 percent of the total number of intended direct beneficiaries (1,000 people), and 5 percent of total intended direct and indirect beneficiaries (4,500 people). The survey was conducted using pen-and-paper questionnaires, by a team of enumerators who visited randomly selected households in the program districts. All respondents indicated their consent to participate in the survey after being informed about the survey purpose and their right to decline to participate. Limitations Much of the information gathered through the survey was self-reported: in many cases, there was no way for the enumerator to verify whether the respondent was telling the truth (e.g., disease incidence, water treatment practices, personal hygiene practices, etc.). In these cases, it is possible that the respondent may have wished to present the “right” answer, rather than the truthful one, due to an (understandable) fear of judgment by the enumerator. Additionally, English translations for open answers to survey questions (e.g., explanations for selecting “other”) were not available for the endline data. Fortunately, this did not significantly limit analysis. Summary of Results This section will detail key results of the baseline and endline surveys, with a focus on the program indicators previously outlined. For a detailed depiction of the answers to all of the questions asked in the survey, including disaggregation by gender and rural/urban location (when applicable), see Appendix B. Demographic Information about Survey Respondents In both the baseline and endline surveys, the majority of respondents were female (85% and 68% in each respective survey). Most were married (77% and 81%), and between the ages of 18-40 (70% and 68%). About half of the households had between 4-6 people, while a third had 7-9 people, and around 15 percent had 1-3 people; 3 percent of households had over 10 people. Between 77-86 percent of the households said that the male head of household could read, while 55-64 percent said that the female head of household could read. Personal Sanitation As outlined in the previous section of this report, the first indicator that will help to measure the overall goal of the Wa(SHG) program is “personal sanitation behaviors.” The KAP survey included a number of questions realting to this indicator, regarding water treatment and hand-washing knowledge and practices.
  • 5. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 3 Water Treatment Knowledge and Practices As seen in Figure 2, there was a clear increase in the number of respondents who could identify at least one way to treat water. Interestingly, the most-commonly cited method for treating water changed from baseline to endline, with solar disinfection mentioned most commonly in the baseline, and settling mentioned most frequently in the endline (see Appendix B for more details). There was a slight increase in the number of respondents who said that they did something to make their water safer to drink (58% to 64%), though this number is still relatively low. There was a dramatic decrease in the number of respondents who said that household members always drink untreated water (see Figure 3), indicating that water treatments practices are, in fact, probably increasing. There were no major age or gender differences in the reported frequency of drinking untreated water, but it is still much more common in rural areas (70%) than urban areas (2%). Of respondents who sometimes do not treat their water, this lack of treatment is most likely to occur during the rainy season, or when there is a lack of money (this was more commonly mentioned in the endline survey than the baseline). There was a drastic decrease in the number of respondents who said they did not know how to treat their water (42% to 2%), that they did not have a method to (41% to 3%), or that they forgot (26% to 3%). However, nearly a third of respondents in the endline survey said that they sometimes did not treat their water because of a bad taste or a bad smell. Hand-Washing Knowledge and Practices In both the baseline and endline surveys, most respondents named several instances in which they usually wash their hands, including before and after eating, before preparing food, and after handling trash. There was a noticeable increase in those who said they washed their hands after latrine use (as seen in Figure 4); reporting hand-washing after defecation also increased noticeably. Encouragingly, there was also a dramatic increase in the number of respondents who reported washing their hands with soap (36% to 76%), though 31 percent of respondents in rural areas still do not wash their hands with soap. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Female Male Rural Urban Baseline Endline Figure 2: Percent of respondents who can identify at least one way to treat water. (Overall: Baseline, 83%; Endline, 95%) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Baseline Endline Always Sometimes Never Figure 3: Reported frequency with which household members drink untreated water 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Female Male Rural Urban Baseline Endline Figure 4: Percent of respondents who say they wash their hands after latrine use. (Overall: Baseline, 59%; Endline, 88%)
  • 6. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 4 As seen in Figure 5, there was also a dramatic increase in the number of households that had soap present in a hand-washing area or near their latrine. This data was based on first-hand observation by the survey enumerators, and thus is likely to be even more reliable than the self-reported hygiene behaviors. For those who said that they don’t wash their hands with soap, the most commonly cited reasons for this were that it’s “not a common practice here,” or “negligence/laziness.” Incidence of Diarrheal Disease The second goal-level indicator for the Wa(SHG) program is incidence of diarrheal disease; incidence of malaria will also be discussed briefly, even though it is not a major focus of the program. There was a decrease in the percent of respondents who reported that a family member had experienced diarrhea in the two weeks proceeding the baseline survey (23%) versus the endline survey (10%), indicating that the Wa(SHG) program activities were indeed successful in achieving their goal. However, there is a possibility that this change is attributable to something other than Wili’s programming, for instance if there were other related interventions occurring in the program region, or if there are normally seasonal fluctuations in diarrheal disease incidence, etc. There was also an increase in the percentage of respondents who correctly identified causes of diarrhea; interestingly though, there was not much increase in those who mentioned “dirty water” as a cause of diarrhea, and the percentage of those who mentioned dirty water in rural areas actually went down. In the endline survey, knowledge for all causes of diarrhea was higher in urban areas, and was higher among women as compared to male respondents. Similarly, knowledge regarding prevention of diarrhea increased from baseline to endline, with especially noticeable increases among those who mentioned “wash hands with soap” (45% to 64%) and “treat water” (38% to 55%). However, as with many other indicators, disaggregating these figures by rural versus urban area provides a more nuanced view: while nearly all respondents in urban areas connected hand- washing and water treatment with diarrheal disease, less than half of those in rural areas did so (see Figure 6). Covering food and preparing food properly were also mentioned frequently in the endline survey. The reported incidence of malaria decreased slightly from baseline to endline (9% to 3%). Knowledge regarding malaria causes and prevention did not change dramatically, although respondents were less likely to name incorrect causes of malaria in the endline survey, and they were slightly more likely to mention eliminating breeding sites and using oil/lotion/herbs on 0% 50% 100% Baseline Endline Rural Urban Figure 5: Soap is present in household. (Overall: Baseline, 23%; Endline, 81%) 57% Decrease in diarrheal disease incidence 0% 50% 100% "Wash hands with soap" "Treat water" Rural Urban Figure 6: Two named ways of preventing diarrheal disease (from endline survey)
  • 7. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 5 skin as prevention measures in the endline survey. Interestingly, as with knowledge regarding diarrhea prevention, female endline survey respondents were more likely to name correct causes and prevention measures for malaria than were male respondents. Latrine Ownership Unfortunately, both in the baseline and endline surveys, there are inconsistencies in the data relating to latrine ownership. For example, even though 99 percent of endline survey respondents stated that their family owns a latrine, half of the respondents stated that they share a latrine with at least one other family, with many respondents sharing latrines with over seven families. It is possible that respondents still considered a latrine to be under their ownership even if it is shared, but this is not clear. Additionally, there is variation in the recorded type of latrine owned by respondents: in the baseline survey, 97 percent of respondents in urban areas stated that they had a pit latrine with a slab, while 90 percent of urban respondents in the endline survey reported having a flush or pour flush latrine. This could be due to an error in data entry, or (less likely) due to a very different sampling strategy used in the baseline versus endline survey. Of course, it is also possible (though also not likely) that nearly all households in the urban areas constructed a flush latrine within the last year. Recommendations While the endline survey shows a similar magnitude of improvement in rural and urban areas, it clearly indicates that the biggest gap in knowledge, practices, and health outcomes remains in the rural areas. Therefore, future programming may wish to focus primarily or exclusively on rural regions. Additionally, since levels of knowledge relating to hygienic practices and water-borne diseases are consistently higher among women than men, future programming could aim to target men and women equally, rather than placing a heavier focus on women (as is a common practice in many development programs). However, if it is determined that focusing on women would help the program benefits to reach a higher number of people (e.g., children), then focusing on women may in fact be appropriate. Conclusions Without further information regarding other programming taking place in the region and other contextual details, it is difficult to definitively state that the positive trends outlined in this report are due to Wili’s Wa(SHG) program. However, this assessment does provide strong evidence that this is probably the case. Not only are Wili’s (probable) program effects diverse— spanning knowledge, practices, and health outcomes—but the magnitude of change is also remarkable, especially given the limited timeframe of the pilot phase. The project team and Wili leadership should be congratulated for a job well done, and should regard their plans for future programming with increased confidence.
  • 8. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 6 Appendix A: Program Logical Framework Objectives Indicators Evidence Risks or Assumptions Goal/Impact To test the implementation of a participatory WaSH training program through the SHG network in order to improve personal hygiene behaviors, alleviate the burden of water- borne diseases, and to improve the basic sanitation of individuals in Ethiopia • Personal sanitation behaviors • Incidence of diarrheal disease • SHG members that have latrines KAP Survey Purpose(s)/Outcome(s) 1.Improved facilitation skills and capacity of 12 FLFs and members of 12 CLA members 1.1 Individual performance during program implementation Program Records • Discovery/participatory learning model will be more effective than didactic learning model • FLFs and CLA members will be effective facilitators 2.SHG members have an increased level of awareness and knowledge of personal WaSH issues 2.1 Knowledge of critical handwashing times 2.2 Awareness of disease transmission and basic hygiene practices KAP Survey, Participant Surveys, Facilitator Reflections • SHG members want to learn about WaSH • SHG members consistently attend group meetings and receive trainings 3.SHG members take meaningful action to improve the WaSH condition of their families, homes, and communities 3.1 Presence of tippy- taps in homes 3.2 Presence of soap 3.3 Presence of latrines in homes 3.4 Change in personal sanitation and hygiene behaviors Individual Actions Plans, Participant Surveys • SHG members are empowered within their household to take action • SHG members have access to financial resources to make changes 4.Bio-sand filters are locally available and purchased by SHG members 4.1 Presence of BSFs in homes 4.2 Intention to purchase BSF BSF M&E, Individual Action Plans • SHG members are interested in buying a bio-sand filter • SHG members have the financial resources to buy bio- sand filters
  • 9. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 7 Outputs 1. Twelve FLFs and twelve CLA members are trained in participatory facilitation skills Certificate in Foundational Facilitation Skills Program Records Participants will be interested and complete the entire course 2. One thousand SHG members are supported and trained in WaSH Awareness and implementing actions plans Attendance at weekly trainings Desire to learn WaSH Awareness Completed and implemented Action Plans Weekly Attendance Sheets, Participant Surveys, Facilitator Reflections, Individual Action Plans Water-borne diseases are a health burden Sanitation and hygiene resources (eg. Soap, bottles, chlorines tabs, etc.) locally available and affordable Individuals and SHGs have the capacity to take community action (eg. Building latrines) 3. Two locally established bio-sand filter manufacturers serving the communities and SHGs Presence of bio-sand filter manufacturing shop Sales record BSF M&E, Individual Action Plans SHG members have the financial resources to buy bio-sand filters Materials necessary for manufacturing locally available and affordable 4. Program successfully monitored and evaluated in a manner that promotes excellence and learning Baseline and terminal KAP survey report Weekly monitoring booklets kept and completed KAP Survey, Monitoring materials
  • 10. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 8 Activities Output 1 1. Develop and produce a Foundational Facilitation Skills module 2. Provide the training module to 12 identified FLFs and 12 CLA representatives Output 2 1. Adapt WaSH Awareness training curriculum to the SHG context and produce materials 2. Identify 12 FLFs and 12 CLA representatives to be trained 3. Train 12 FLFs in ToT of WaSH curriculum, building on the foundational facilitation skills training 4. Support the training of CLA members in WaSH curriculum 5. Support the training of SHG members in WaSH curriculum 6. Track the establishment and implementation of Action Plans Output 3 1. Identify and capacitate two local manufacturers to produce bio-sand filters 2. Include household water treatment options, including bio-sand filters, in WaSH curriculum Output 4 1. Design monitoring and evaluation tools and formats 2. Translate materials to Amharic 3. Train program staff on monitoring plan 4. Conduct baseline and terminal KAP surveys 5. Analyze monitoring and evaluation data Necessary resources available in Ethiopia FLFs and CLA members schedules accommodate a multiple day training Necessary resources available in Ethiopia Proper permissions allow for editing of WaSH Awareness materials Strongly established CLAs exist in target area FLFs have time to receive this training FLFs have time to give training to CLA members CLA members have time to give training to SHGs over a period of 12 weeks Effective monitoring system established Local manufacturer will want to learn a new skill and commit to developing a new business Necessary resources available in Ethiopia Monitoring formats are practical for intended purposes Staff makes time to do regular monitoring
  • 11. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 9 Appendix B: Complete Baseline and Endline Survey Data Household Demographics Baseline Endline Total (n=219) Female (n=186) Male (n=33) Rural (n=129) Urban (n=90) Total (n=210) Female (n=158) Male (n=44) Rural (n=140) Urban (n=70) Gender of the respondent Female 85% 78% Male 15% 22% What is your marital status? Single 9% 7% Married 77% 81% Separated/Divorced 4% 2% Widow/er 10% 9% How old are you now? (average) 37 36 Age bracket of the respondent 12-17 3% 2% 18-40 70% 68% 41-59 20% 25% 60+ 7% 5% Who is the respondent? (relationship within the household) Wife 80% 72% Husband 13% 20% Daughter 3% 4% Son 2% 4% Grandparent 1% 0% Other 1% 0% How many people are living in the household? (average) 1-3 15% 16% 4-6 51% 49% 7-9 31% 32% 10-12 3% 2% Male head of household can read 77% 70% 94% 86% 84% 91% Female head of household can read 55% 36% 82% 64% 56% 82%
  • 12. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 10 Household Water Supply and Practices Baseline Endline Total (n=219) Female (n=186) Male (n=33) Rural (n=129) Urban (n=90) Total (n=210) Female (n=158) Male (n=44) Rural (n=140) Urban (n=70) Who usually collects water for the family? Adult women 41% 55% 21% 56% 69% 30% Girls 33% 34% 32% 34% 27% 48% Boys 13% 5% 23% 7% 2% 16% Adult men 7% 3% 12% 3% 2% 6% Delivered 4% 1% 8% 0% 0% 0% Other 2% 2% 3% 0% 0% 0% Distance between dwelling and source of drinking water Within 500m 58% 27% 95% 77% 66% 98% 500m-1km 22% 36% 5% 18% 26% 1% 1km-3km 11% 21% 0% 5% 8% 0% More than 3km 9% 17% 0% 0% 0% 0% Minutes spent collecting water (round- trip) Under 30 53% 24% 94% 71% 57% 99% 30 mins - 1 hour 13% 18% 5% 17% 25% 1% 1-2 hours 21% 36% 0% 7% 10% 0% 2+ hours 13% 22% 1% 5% 8% 0% Household Water Treatment and Storage Baseline Endline Total (n=219) Female (n=186) Male (n=33) Rural (n=129) Urban (n=90) Total (n=210) Female (n=158) Male (n=44) Rural (n=140) Urban (n=70) Number of large jerry cans collected each day for entire household 1 1% 1% 2 39% 42% 3-4 29% 35% 4+ 31% 22%
  • 13. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 11 Named ways of making water safer Solar disinfection 36% 16% Boiling 35% 51% Settling 23% 61% Liquid chlorine 20% 46% Other 19% 14% Cloth filter 16% 34% None 16% 1% Chlorine tablets 13% 38% Ceramic filter 8% 9% Membrane filter 7% 22% Bio-sand filter 1% 12% Coagulant/flocculent 0% 7% Can identify at least one way to treat water 83% 82% 84% 71% 99% 95% 96% 91% 92% 100% Respondent gave permission for enumerator to observe them getting a cup of drinking water normally served to children Yes 96% 97% No 3% 2% Didn't have 1% 1% (Observed) Sample was collected safely 63% 62% 65% 57% 70% 83% 81% 86% 74% 100% Source of water sample Public standpipe 61% 72% 44% 69% 91% 27% Piped connection to hh 19% 6% 38% 28% 3% 73% Protected dug well 8% 13% 0% 0% 0% 0% Borehole 2% 4% 0% 1% 2% 0% Bottled water 2% 3% 1% 1% 1% 0% Rainwater 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% Protected spring 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% Tanker 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% Unprotected dug well 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Unprotected spring 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
  • 14. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 12 Other 16% 0% 16% 2% 3% 0% (Observed) Water container was covered/closed 81% 95% (Observed) Water container was clean 67% 87% (Observed) Water container was out of reach of animals 68% 87% Water was collected safely (no hands) and was stored in a container that was clean, covered, and out of reach of animals 44% 31% 62% 75% 65% 96% (Observed) Type of container used Jerry can with lid 74% 90% Jerry can 18% 4% Bucket 3% 1% Gallon jug 2% 1% Ceramic pot 1% 1% Bucket with tap 1% 4% Large drum 0% Other 0% Respondent said they did something to make water safer to drink Yes 58% 64% No 35% 35% Do not know 7% 1% How respondent says they made water safer to drink (only respondents who responded "yes" to previous question) Solar disinfection 33% 8% Boiling 22% 13% Settling 19% 26% Chlorine tablets 11% 11% Liquid chlorine 6% 22% Other 3% 1% Ceramic filter 3% 1% Membrane filter 2% 3%
  • 15. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 13 Cloth filter 1% 5% Biosand filter 0% 5% Coagulent/flocculant 0% 4% (Observed, if there is a filter) Filter is assembled correctly 83% 100% (Observed, if there is a filter) Filter is wet 5% 71% (Observed, if there is a filter) Filter is clean 83% 88% Frequency that adult men drink untreated water Always 52% 50% 55% 10% 14% 3% Sometimes 32% 36% 26% 37% 55% 1% Never 16% 14% 19% 53% 32% 96% Frequency that adult women drink untreated water Always 52% 49% 56% 9% 13% 0% Sometimes 32% 38% 25% 37% 56% 0% Never 16% 13% 19% 54% 31% 100% Frequency that children drink untreated water Always 52% 49% 57% 9% 13% 0% Sometimes 29% 41% 9% 40% 60% 0% Never 19% 9% 35% 51% 27% 100% Frequency that sick/elderly drink untreated water Always 47% 50% 41% 9% 13% 0% Sometimes 37% 41% 29% 38% 56% 1% Never 17% 9% 30% 53% 31% 99% Average frequency of drinking untreated water Always 51% 50% 52% 9% 13% 1% Sometimes 34% 39% 22% 38% 57% 1% Never 15% 11% 26% 53% 30% 98%
  • 16. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 14 When respondent says they do not treat water (multiple answers allowed) Rainy season 28% 43% 7% 24% 32% 9% Never 22% 5% 48% Other 19% 15% 21% 12% 14% 9% Dry season 16% 16% 17% 15% 19% 7% Respondent always treats water 16% 13% 28% 23% 4% 42% 45% 30% 28% 71% When no time 9% 4% 17% 1% 0% 3% When no money 2% 2% 2% 18% 16% 20% Reasons respondent gives for not treating water (multiple answers allowed) Does not know how 42% 44% 34% 7% 50% 2% 1% 5% 3% 0% Do not have a method to 41% 3% Forgot 26% 6% Bad taste 16% 34% Other 12% 28% Bad smell 12% 31% Thinks water is clean 8% * Requires too much money 8% 1% Requires too much time 5% 1% Broken 1% 0% Reasons respondent gives for treating water (multiple answers allowed) Prevents disease 75% 87% Makes water safe 69% 81% Other 17% 3% Free 2% 0% Someone told me to 1% 2%
  • 17. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 15 Sanitation Practices Baseline Endline Total (n=219) Female (n=186) Male (n=33) Rural (n=129) Urban (n=90) Total (n=210) Female (n=158) Male (n=44) Rural (n=140) Urban (n=70) Family owns latrine 98% 99% Who helped construct latrine Self 68% 65% Local authority/Gov't 27% 25% NGO 3% 16% SHG 1% 2% Other 1% 1% Type of latrine Pit latrine with slab 70% 51% 97% 48% 67% 9% Pit latrine without slab 28% 48% 1% 20% 29% 0% Flush/pour flush 1% 2% 0% 30% 1% 90% Composting 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% Latrine draining to canal/creek/river 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% Other 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% Distance between latrine and house Less than 50m 88% 82% 97% 92% 87% 100% More than 50m 12% 18% 3% 8% 13% 0% Number of families sharing latrine (if no latrine in household) 2-4 32% 31% 33% 36% 21% 45% 5-7 28% 52% 19% 27% 36% 22% 7+ 40% 17% 49% 37% 46% 33% Where family members go for defecation (if no latrine) Public latrine 37% 41% Creek/canal/river 32% 0% Neighbor's latrine 11% 0% Other 11% 45% Plastic bag 5% 0% Dig a hole, bush/backyard/field 5% 14%
  • 18. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 16 Main reason why family cannot construct a latrine (if no latrine) Not a priority 56% 0% Defecation is not an issue 17% 6% Other 17% 83% Too expensive 6% 6% A lot of space to defecate here 6% 0% No space for construction 0% 6% Disease Morbidity/Mortality and Management Baseline Endline Total (n=219) Female (n=186) Male (n=33) Rural (n=129) Urban (n=90) Total (n=210) Female (n=158) Male (n=44) Rural (n=140) Urban (n=70) Someone in family has had diarrhea in last two weeks 23% 35% 7% 10% 13% 2% Age of family member who had diarrhea 0-5 years old 17% 25% 6-17 years old 31% 25% 18-59 years old 42% 50% 60+ years old 10% 0% Someone in hh died within last 6 months due to diarrhea 2% 3% 0% 1% 1% 0% Age of member of hh who died 0-5 years old 0% 0% 6-17 years old 25% 100% 18-59 years old 75% 0% 60+ years old 0% 0% Causes of diarrhea named by respondents (multiple answers allowed) Dirty food 60% 63% 47% 41% 38% 76% 76% 73% 67% 94% Dirty water 59% 60% 53% 57% 63% 64% 66% 59% 50% 92% Poor hygiene 48% 49% 41% 44% 54% 64% 68% 48% 57% 77% Flies 47% 45% 56% 40% 57% 70% 68% 70% 62% 84%
  • 19. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 17 Germs 43% 42% 47% 43% 43% 50% 54% 30% 31% 89% Dirty hands 39% 38% 47% 34% 47% 56% 58% 41% 41% 87% Open defecation 21% 22% 16% 18% 26% 45% 49% 32% 26% 81% Other 6% 6% 6% 9% 2% 3% 4% 0% 5% 0% Rain 5% 3% 16% 9% 0% 7% 8% 2% 4% 14% Part of child's growth 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 5% 4% 5% 2% 11% Witchcraft 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% Do not know 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Respondent correctly identifies at least one cause of diarrhea (dirty food, dirty water, flies, germs, dirty hands, or open defecation) 92% 92% 91% 89% 96% 98% 98% 98% 97% 100% Ways of preventing diarrhea named by respondents (multiple answers allowed) Cover food 58% 54% 75% 60% 54% 71% 75% 52% 57% 99% Drink clean water 55% 54% 59% 53% 57% 74% 78% 57% 65% 93% Wash hands with soap 45% 47% 34% 28% 69% 64% 66% 52% 46% 99% Latrine use 44% 40% 66% 47% 40% 73% 71% 80% 68% 84% Prepare food properly (cooking, washing) 42% 42% 44% 36% 50% 51% 54% 34% 30% 94% Treat water 38% 35% 56% 42% 33% 55% 55% 48% 36% 94% Store water safely 38% 40% 28% 21% 63% 60% 66% 36% 41% 99% No open defecation 30% 31% 25% 22% 41% 54% 58% 34% 34% 94% Prayer 12% 12% 16% 14% 10% 3% 4% 0% 2% 4% Go to traditional healer 8% 8% 13% 12% 2% 2% 2% 0% 1% 3% Other 7% 8% 3% 10% 2% 1% 2% 0% 2% 0% Do not know 1% 1% 3% 2% 0% 1% 1% 3% 2% 0% Respondent correctly identifies at least one way of preventing diarrhea (cover food, drink clean water, wash hands with soap, latrine use, prepare food properly, treat water, store water safely, no open defecation) 98% 97% 100% 96% 100% 99% 98% 100% 98% 100% Someone in family has had malaria in last two weeks 9% 2% 19% 3% 2% 3%
  • 20. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 18 Age of family member who had malaria 0-5 years old 16% 25% 6-17 years old 37% 50% 18-59 years old 42% 25% 60+ years old 5% 0% Someone in family died within last 6 months due to malaria 0% 1% 1% 0% Age of hh member who died due to malaria 0-5 years old 0% 0% 6-17 years old 100% 0% 18-59 years old 0% 100% 60+ years old 0% 0% Causes of malaria named by respondents (multiple answers allowed) Mosquito bites 78% 78% 78% 87% 64% 87% 92% 77% 88% 86% Dirty water 44% 48% 25% 22% 74% 27% 31% 11% 9% 63% Rain/water 21% 18% 41% 35% 1% 9% 9% 5% 4% 19% Sunshine 17% 18% 13% 10% 27% 15% 18% 5% 1% 43% Dirty food 17% 20% 3% 7% 32% 15% 18% 5% 2% 41% Flies 14% 16% 6% 8% 23% 23% 21% 30% 19% 31% Bush/grasses 12% 13% 6% 6% 21% 26% 32% 7% 9% 60% Other 12% 12% 9% 14% 9% 2% 3% 0% 4% 0% Witchcraft 1% 2% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Ways of preventing malaria named by respondents (multiple answers allowed) Use of bednets 89% 88% 97% 88% 91% 90% 92% 80% 89% 91% Eliminate mosquito breeding site 72% 72% 75% 77% 64% 85% 91% 66% 88% 86% Use of smoke 39% 38% 44% 35% 44% 26% 27% 25% 27% 24% Proper hygiene 37% 38% 28% 26% 52% 39% 40% 25% 22% 71% Not taking dirty water/food 27% 31% 6% 16% 44% 19% 22% 2% 3% 51% Other 6% 7% 3% 10% 1% 4% 4% 2% 6% 0% Use oil/lotion/herbs on skin 1% 1% 0% 0% 3% 10% 11% 5% 0% 30%
  • 21. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 19 Stop witchcraft 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 3% Respondent correctly identifies at least way of preventing malaria (using bednet, eliminating breeding sites, use of smoke, using oil/lotion/herbs on skin) 95% 95% 97% 93% 98% 95% 97% 84% 94% 97% Hand-washing Practices Baseline Endline Total (n=219) Female (n=186) Male (n=33) Rural (n=129) Urban (n=90) Total (n=210) Female (n=158) Male (n=44) Rural (n=140) Urban (n=70) Times that respondents say they usually wash hands Before eating 97% 97% 94% 95% 100% 90% 91% 84% 86% 99% After eating 88% 89% 84% 80% 100% 68% 72% 50% 54% 97% Before food preparation 79% 82% 59% 80% 82% 78% 83% 55% 69% 93% After handling trash 63% 63% 63% 64% 62% 65% 70% 41% 55% 84% After latrine use 59% 56% 75% 61% 57% 88% 88% 84% 82% 99% After defecation 39% 35% 59% 46% 29% 60% 63% 43% 43% 94% Before feeding child 31% 30% 34% 31% 30% 47% 49% 34% 31% 0% After handling animals 19% 19% 13% 28% 6% 31% 31% 25% 20% 54% After handling baby's diaper/feces 13% 12% 19% 12% 14% 37% 39% 20% 19% 74% Other 5% 5% 3% 7% 1% 6% 7% 5% 9% 0% What respondents say they usually use when washing hands Water only 61% 66% 32% 58% 66% 10% 12% 7% 15% 1% Water and soap 36% 32% 58% 37% 34% 76% 75% 80% 69% 91% Water and ash 3% 2% 10% 6% 0% 13% 13% 12% 16% 7% Water and sand/leaves 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Other 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Main factor that prevents family from using soap (only respondents who said they don't use soap) Not a common practice here 44% 45% 30% 41% 48% 27% 30% 18% 32% 0% Negligence/laziness 30% 30% 30% 25% 36% 40% 38% 55% 45% 13%
  • 22. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 20 Too expensive 8% 6% 30% 14% 0% 13% 15% 9% 14% 13% Water alone cleanses the hands 8% 9% 0% 3% 16% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Other 5% 5% 0% 8% 0% 17% 15% 18% 9% 63% Takes time 5% 4% 10% 8% 0% 2% 3% 0% 0% 13% (Observed) House has a hand-washing facility No 61% 65% 57% 16% 22% 2% Water and soap at hand-washing area 16% 13% 20% 40% 36% 48% Only water (no soap) at hand-washing area 12% 14% 9% 2% 1% 3% Water and soap in or near latrine 7% 4% 11% 41% 38% 47% Only water (no soap) in or near latrine 4% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% Soap is present in household (water and soap at hand-washing area or near latrine) 23% 17% 31% 81% 74% 95%
  • 23. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 21 Appendix C: Survey Instrument (Questionnaire) SuSurvey Post Office Box 540318 | Orlando, FL 32854 | 407.716.4214 | www.waterIslifeinternational.org KAP Survey on WaSH and Household Water Treatment Methods INFORMED CONSENT Good morning/good afternoon. My name is __________________. I am part of a team of people who are assessing water practices in your community. Our team will be interviewing different households in your area. Your local leaders have granted us permission to conduct this study, and your house has been randomly selected to participate. You have been asked to participate in this study because your personal views and experiences as a community member are important to us. If you participate, I will ask you questions about your drinking water and water use habits. The interview will take approximately 30 minutes. No one except me will know that it was you who answered these questions. Would you like to participate? A Interviewer B Survey Number C Date D Time E Location (Woreda, Kebele, Sub City, Village) Section 1: HOUSEHOLD DEMOGRAPHICS 1. Gender of the respondent 1[ ] Female 2[ ] Male 2. What is your marital status? 1[ ] Single 2[ ] Married 3[ ] Separated/Divorced 4[ ] Widow/er 3. How old are you now? ________ years 4. Age bracket of the respondent 1[ ] 12-17 yo 2[ ] 18-40 yo 3[ ] 41-59 yo 4[ ] 60 yo and above 5. Who is the respondent? (relationship within the household) 1[ ] Wife 2[ ] Husband 3[ ] Daughter 4[ ] Son 5[ ] Grandparent 6[ ] Other: 6. How many people are living in the household? ________ people Age Bracket Male Female Total 7. 0 – 5 years old 8. 6 – 17 years old 9. 18 – 59 years old 10. 60+ years old 11. Can the male head of household read? 1[ ] Yes 2[ ] No 12. Can the female head of household read? 1[ ] Yes 2[ ] No 13. What is your educational background? 1[ ] Can’t read/write 2[ ] 1 – 6 years 3[ ] 7 – 9 years 4[ ] 10 – 12 years 5[ ] College and above Section 2: HOUSEHOLD WATER SUPPLY AND PRACTICES 14. Who usually collects water for the family? 1[ ] Adult men 2[ ] Boys 3[ ] Delivered 4[ ] Adult women 5[ ] Girls 6[ ] Other: 15. How far from your dwelling is the source of 1[ ] within 500 m 2[ ] 500m – 1km
  • 24. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 22 SuSurvey Post Office Box 540318 | Orlando, FL 32854 | 407.716.4214 | www.waterIslifeinternational.org your drinking water? 3[ ] 1km – 3 km 4[ ] More than 3 km 16. How many minutes do you spend collecting water from the source (round-trip)? 1[ ] within 30 mins 2[ ] 30 mins – 1 hour 3[ ] 1 hour – 2 hours 4[ ] More than 2 hours 17. How many large jerry cans of water are collected each day for the entire household? (Jerry can=20 L) 1[ ] 1 jerry can 2[ ] 2 jerry cans 2[ ] 3 – 4 jerry cans 4[ ] more than 4 jerry cans Section 3: HOUSEHOLD WATER TREATMENT AND STORAGE 18. Can you tell me all the ways you know to make water safe to drink in your home? (Multiple answer, ask “Any others?”) 1[ ] Boiling 2[ ] Settling 3[ ] Solar disinfection 4[ ]Chlorine tablets 5[ ] Membrane filter 6[ ] Ceramic filter 7[ ] Liquid Chlorine 8[ ] Biosand filter 9[ ]Coagulant/ flocculent 10[ ] Cloth filter 11[ ] None 12[ ] Other: 19. May I observe you giving me a cup of your current drinking water for children from this household? 1[ ] Yes 2[ ] No 3[ ] Do not have 20. OBSERVE: Was sample collected safely (not touching water with hands)? 1[ ] Yes 2[ ] No 21. What source did this water come from? 1[ ] Piped connection in hh 2[ ] Public standpipe 3[ ] Protected dug well 4[ ] Borehole 5[ ] Rainwater 6[ ] Tanker 7[ ] Protected spring 8[ ] Unprotected dug well 9[ ] Bottled water 10[ ] Unprotected spring 11[ ] Other: 22. OBSERVE: Is the container covered/closed? 1[ ] Yes 2[ ] No 23. OBSERVE: Is the container clean? 1[ ] Yes 2[ ] No 24. OBSERVE: Is the container out of reach of animals? 1[ ] Yes 2[ ] No 25. OBSERVE: What container is used for drinking water? 1[ ] Bucket 2[ ] Jerry can 3[ ] Jerry can with lid 4[ ] Gallon jug 5[ ] Bucket with tap 6[ ] Ceramic pot 7[ ] Large drum 8[ ] Other: 26. Did you do anything to make the water safer to drink? 1[ ] Yes 2[ ] No (if NO, proceed to Q31) 3[ ] Do not know 27. How did you make this water safer to drink? 1[ ] Boiling 2[ ] Settling 3[ ] Solar disinfection 4[ ]Chlorine tablets 5[ ] Membrane filter 6[ ] Ceramic filter 7[ ] Liquid Chlorine 8[ ] Biosand filter 9[ ]Coagulant/ flocculent 10[ ] Cloth filter 11[ ] Other: 28. If filter, OBSERVE: is the filter assembled correctly? 1[ ] Yes 2[ ] No 29. If filter, OBSERVE: is the filter wet? 1[ ] Yes 2[ ] No
  • 25. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 23 SuSurvey Post Office Box 540318 | Orlando, FL 32854 | 407.716.4214 | www.waterIslifeinternational.org 30. If filter, OBSERVE: is the filter clean? 1[ ] Yes 2[ ] No How often do: 31. -adult men drink untreated water? 1[ ] Always 2[ ] Sometimes 3[ ] Never 32. -adult women drink untreated water? 1[ ] Always 2[ ] Sometimes 3[ ] Never 33. -children drink untreated water? 1[ ] Always 2[ ] Sometimes 3[ ] Never 34. -sick/elderly drink untreated water? 1[ ] Always 2[ ] Sometimes 3[ ] Never 35. When do you NOT treat your water? (multiple answers allowed) 1[ ] Dry season 2[ ] Rainy season 3[ ] When no money 4[ ] When no time 5[ ] I always treat water 6[ ] Other: 36. Why do you NOT treat your water? (multiple answers allowed) 1[ ] Bad taste 2[ ] Bad smell 3[ ] Forgot 4[ ] Requires too much money 5[ ] Do not know how 6[ ] Takes too much time 7[ ] Broken 8[ ] Do not have a method to 9[ ] Other: 37. Why do you treat your water? (multiple answers allowed) 1[ ] Makes water safe 2[ ] Prevents disease 3[ ] Someone told me to 4[ ] Free 5[ ] Other: Section 4: SANITATION PRACTICES 38. Does your family own a latrine? 1[ ] Yes 2[ ] No (if NO, proceed to Q42) 39. If YES, who helped you construct the latrine? 1[ ] Self 2[ ] Local authority/Govt 3[ ] NGO 4[ ] SHG 5[ ] Other: 40. If YES, which type of latrine do you have? 1[ ] Flush/pour flush 2[ ] Composting latrine 3[ ] Pit latrine with slab 4[ ] Pit latrine without slab 5[ ] Latrine draining to canal/creek/river 6[ ] Other: 41. If YES, how far is the latrine from your house? (Then, proceed to Q45) 1[ ] Within 50 meters 2[ ] More than 50 meters 42. If sharing latrine with others, how many families are sharing? 1[ ] 2-4 families 2[ ] 5-7 families 3[ ] More than 7 families 43. If NO latrine, where do your family members go for defecation? (Tick the one that the family usually practices) 1[ ] Neighbor’s latrine 2[ ] Public latrine 3[ ] Plastic bag 4[ ] Dig a hole 4[ ] Bush/backyard/field 5[ ] Creek/canal/river 6[ ] Other: 44. If NO latrine, what could be the MAIN reason why your family cannot construct a latrine? (Tick the one main reason) 1[ ] Too expensive 2[ ] Not a priority 3[ ] No space for construction 4[ ] A lot of space to defecate here 5[ ] Defecation is not an issue 6[ ] Other: Section 5: DISEASE MORBIDITY/MORTALITY AND MANAGEMENT 45. In the last 2 weeks, has anyone in your family had diarrhea? (Note that diarrhea is defined as the passing of stool 3 times or more in 24 hours whether it is watery, bloody, mucoid, or water- 1[ ] Yes 2 [ ] No (If no, go straight to Q47)
  • 26. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 24 SuSurvey Post Office Box 540318 | Orlando, FL 32854 | 407.716.4214 | www.waterIslifeinternational.org wash like) 46. If YES, how old is the family member who had diarrhea? ___________ 1[ ] 0-5 years old 2[ ] 6-17 years old 3[ ] 18-59 years old 4[ ] 60 and above 47. Has anyone in your household died due to diarrhea for the last 6 months? 1[ ] Yes 2[ ] No (If no, proceed to Q49) 48. If YES, how old was that member of the household? __________ 1[ ] 0-5 years old 2[ ] 6-17 years old 3[ ] 18-59 years old 4[ ] 60 and above 49. What do you think can be the cause of diarrhea? (Tick all that the respondent mentions but do not influence his/her response) 1[ ] Rain 2[ ] Dirty hands 3[ ] Witchcraft 4[ ] Flies 5[ ] Dirty food 6[ ] Dirty water 7[ ] Germs 8[ ] Part of child’s growth 9[ ] Poor hygiene 10[ ] Open defecation 11[ ] Do not know 12[ ] Other: 50. How do you think diarrhea can be prevented? (Tick all that the respondent mentions but never influence his/her responses) 1[ ] Prayer 2[ ] Latrine use 3[ ] Treat water 4[ ] Do not know 5[ ] Covering food 6[ ] Drink clean water 7[ ] No open defecation 8[ ] Store water safely 9[ ] Wash hands with soap 10[ ] Prepare food properly (cooking, washing) 11[ ] Go to traditional healer 12: Other: 51. In the last 2 weeks, has anyone in your family had malaria? 1[ ] Yes 2 [ ] No (If no, go straight to Q53) 52. If YES, how old is the family member who had malaria? ___________ 1[ ] 0-5 years old 2[ ] 6-17 years old 3[ ] 18-59 years old 4[ ] 60 and above 53. Has anyone in your household died due to malaria for the last 6 months? 1[ ] Yes 2[ ] No (If no, proceed to Q55) 54. If YES, how old was that member of the household? __________ 1[ ] 0-5 years old 2[ ] 6-17 years old 3[ ] 18-59 years old 4[ ] 60 and above 55. What do you think is the cause of malaria? (Tick all that the respondent mentions but do not influence) 1[ ] Rain/water 2[ ] Sunshine 3[ ] Witchcraft 4[ ] Flies 5[ ] Dirty food 6[ ] Dirty water 7[ ] Mosquito bites 8[ ] Bush/ grasses 9[ ] Other: 56. What do you think is the best way to protect yourself from malaria? (Tick all that the respondent mentions but never influence his/her responses) 1[ ] Proper hygiene 2[ ] Use of smoke 3[ ] Stop witchcraft 4[ ] Use oil/ lotion/herbs on skin 5[ ] Not taking dirty water/food 6[ ] Eliminate mosquito breeding site 7[ ] Use of bed nets 8[ ] Other: Section 6: HANDWASHING PRACTICES 57. Please tell me the times you usually wash your hands? (ONLY tick what the respondent says.) 1[ ] Before eating 2[ ] After latrine use 3[ ] Before feeding child 4[ ] After eating 5[ ] After defecation 6[ ] After handling trash 7[ ] Before food 8[ ] After 9[ ] After
  • 27. iWa(SHG) Endline Survey Report – March 2016 | 25 SuSurvey Post Office Box 540318 | Orlando, FL 32854 | 407.716.4214 | www.waterIslifeinternational.org preparation handling baby’s diaper/feces handling animals 10[ ] Other: 58. What do you usually use in washing hands? (Tick the most commonly practiced) 1[ ] Water only 2[ ] Water and soap 3[ ] Water and sand/leaves 4[ ] Water and ash 5[ ] Other: 59. If the answer is 1 (water only), What is the MAIN factor that prevents your family from using soap? 1[ ] Washing with soap takes time 2[ ] Soap is not a common practice here 3[ ] Negligence/laziness 4[ ] Too expensive 5[ ] Water alone cleanses the hand 6[ ] Other: 60. OBSERVATION ONLY: Is there any hand washing facility available around the home? 1[ ] There are water and soap near or within the latrine 2[ ] There is ONLY water near or within the latrine 3[ ] There are water and soap at a designated hand washing area 4[ ] There is ONLY water at a designated hand washing area 5[ ] There is no available washing station NOTES: ü Review the questionnaire ü Ensure that you did not skip/forget any of the required fields ü Thank the respondent for this/her participation