1. The document discusses different perspectives on responding to crises, including a human-centered perspective focused on control versus a universe-centered perspective focused on surrender. 2. It presents an integrative ABCD model of inclusive positivity that involves affect, behavior, cognition, and direction. 3. The model suggests both positive and negative emotions, as well as both intentional efforts and surrendering, are important for well-being.

3. Human-centered
Perspective
Universe-centered
Perspective
Vs.
Control
Surrender

4.
Integra)ve
ABCD
of
Inclusive
posi)vity
Affect:
nega)ve
vs.
posi)ve
Behavior:
struggle
vs.
surrender
Cogni)on:
pleasure
vs.
meaning
Direc)on:
individual
vs.
world

5. Sensation
Emotion
Function
Meaning
Self Transcendent
Self Actualization
Spiritual WB
Psychological
WB
Social WB
Emotional WB
Flourish

6. SYMBIOSIS
Mutual Complements

8. Procedure
Individual Auto-descriptive Survey asking
personal experience and psychological issues
related to the disaster.
*Post traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI-J)
*Attribution-Style Questionnaire (ASQ)
(From September to November 2011)
321 students residing in the Tokyo
metropolitan area
(F=84; M=123; not identified=115)
(Average age: 27.67 ± 6.91)
Participants
311 PTG Study Method

9. Nega*vity
correlates
with
PTG

10. The American
Girls
The Japanese
Girls
Vs.
Go! Fight! Win! “OMOTENASHI”
Unexpressed Kindness

11. The
Japanese
doesn’t
show
emo)ons.

12. KANASHIMI
悲
SORROW
愛
LOVE

13. 1. universe-­‐centered,
not
human-­‐centered
perspec*ve.
2.
as
altruis*c/pro-­‐social
behaviors,
appears
ins*nc*vely
at
crisis,
3.
stops
figh*ng
with
others,
society,
nature
and
ourselves,
4.
has
both
posi*ve
and
nega*ve
emo*ons,
5.
requires
both
inten*onal
efforts
and
surrendering
6.
has
both
meaningful
and
pleasurable,
7.
promotes
individual
and
the
world
wellbeing.

14.
愛
LOVE
悲
SORROW