2. Investigate if six of the Character Strengths from
Peterson and Seligman’s classification (2004)
predicted any of the three leadership styles of
Transformational, Transactional or Laissez-Faire
(Bass & Avolio, 2004).
2
9. H1: The six Character Strengths of Hope,
Spirituality, Humility, Gratitude, Humor and
Prudence predict Transformational leadership
style.
F= (6,149)= 2.98, p< .01
Hope was found to be a significant individual
contributor (β = .25, p< .05)
9
10. H2; The six Character Strengths of Hope,
Spirituality, Humility, Gratitude, Humor and
Prudence predict Transactional Leadership style.
F= (6,141) = 3.31, p< .005.
Spirituality made a unique significant negative
contribution (β = .21, p < .02)
10
11. H3; The six Character Strengths of Hope,
Spirituality, Humility, Gratitude, Humor and
Prudence predict Laissez-Faire leadership style.
H3 not confirmed
None of the 6 Character Strengths made any
significant contributions
11
12. Peterson, Walumbwa, Byron & Myrowitz (2009)
found that the positive psychological traits of
Hope, Optimism and Resiliency was related to
Transformational Leadership in CEO’s in High-
Technology Firms
Chaturvedi, Arvey, Zhang & Cristoforou (2011)
found that the genetic influence on
Transformational leadership was mediated by
dispositional hope.
12
13. Jamaludin, Rahman, Makhbul & Idris (2011)
found that Spiritual leadership can be
distinguished from Transactional and
Transformational leadership.
McKee, Driscoll, Kelloway & Kelley (2011)
found a relationship between the effects of
Transformational Leadership and employees
spiritual well-being in health care workers
13
14. In a study done by Riggio, Zhu, Maroosis &
Reina (2010) Laissez-Faire leadership was found
to negatively correlate to Prudence (-.64).
Avolio, Howell & Sosik (1999) found that
inactive, laissez-faire leadership was negatively
related to the use of humor.
14
15. The higher Hope, the higher Transformational
leadership
The more spiritual a leader is, the less
Transactional leader he is.
Both TL and CS/Virtues can be developed
can be used in leadership development programs
15
16. Character Strengths and Virtues can be seen as
universally and religiously applicable across
many of the countries and world religions
(Seligman et al, 2004; 2006)
Heightens CS/V’s value and importance for
universally accepted leadership
Can contribute to an international
conceptualization of global leadership theory
16
17. Using self-reporting;
› Consistency motif
› Implicit theories
› Social acceptability
Length of questionnaire
English versions
Low response rate hinders generalization
Sample limitation; 71.7% males, 28.3 % women
17
18. Replicate among other Norwegian leaders
Replicate among leaders in other nations and
continents
Study other precursors to Transformational
leadership that can be developed
Longitudinal experimental design research
18
19. This research contributed to the overall
knowledge base of
› leadership and to the evolving research about
› Character Strengths/Virtues and positive psychology
This research filled a gap in the literature
studying antencedents to TL that are not stable
inherent traits
19