![Photo: Puspitaloka (2017)
Photo: Puspitaloka (2017)
Fishermans in the border of restoration site
Local community shown post-2015 fire.
“[restoration] is restoring [peat] its functions, but,
accompanied by understanding in the level
of community support [who live] nearby.
When there are no supports from the
community, [restoration] is non-sense,
regardless of costs incurred, supports, [and]
policies, [if the community] nearby the
restoration area do not fully understand the
concept and goals, [then] the restoration
efforts will be meaningless…how the
[community] engage, the knowledge transfer,
[those are] all that matters on restoration.”]()
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (6)
Similar to SCIENCE@10 CIFOR - Restoring Degraded Tropical Peatlands: Case Studies from Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
Similar to SCIENCE@10 CIFOR - Restoring Degraded Tropical Peatlands: Case Studies from Central Kalimantan, Indonesia (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
SCIENCE@10 CIFOR - Restoring Degraded Tropical Peatlands: Case Studies from Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
- 1. RESTORING DEGRADED TROPICAL PEATLANDS: CASE STUDIES FROM CENTRAL KALIMANTAN, INDONESIA Dyah Puspitaloka (dp735@nau.edu) Dr. Yeon-Su Kim (advisor) • Dr. Peter Z. Fulé & Dr. Herry Purnomo (committee member) bit.ly/CentralKalimantanPeatlands
- 2. Photo: Puspitaloka (2017) Photo: Puspitaloka (2017) Fishermans in the border of restoration site Local community shown post-2015 fire. “[restoration] is restoring [peat] its functions, but, accompanied by understanding in the level of community support [who live] nearby. When there are no supports from the community, [restoration] is non-sense, regardless of costs incurred, supports, [and] policies, [if the community] nearby the restoration area do not fully understand the concept and goals, [then] the restoration efforts will be meaningless…how the [community] engage, the knowledge transfer, [those are] all that matters on restoration.”
- 3. “The illegal logging still occur. They are not only taking ramin [Gonystylus bancanus, valuable hardwood species], but also not valuable species as well. In April [2017], we found thousand logs transported outside the area illegally.” Photo: Puspitaloka (2017) Photo: Puspitaloka (2017) Fishermans in the border of restoration site Local community shown post-2015 fire.
- 4. Socio-Economic and Ecological Challenges of Peatland Restoration in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia Challenges Project A (NGO and national park) Project B (Government and NGO) Project C (Private sector and NGO) Project D (Private sector and university) Anthropogenic pressures 92% 89% 100% 100% Ecological conditions 92% 47% 70% 100% Recurring fires 92% 74% 70% 60% Funding 62% 32% 30% 100% Law enforcement - - 20% 60% Supporting regulation 8% 16% 30% 20% Technical difficulties 38% 26% - 40% Spatial regional planning 46% 26% 30% 40% Human resources 23% 26% 20% 60% Institutional issues 69% 42% 60% 40% Research - 11% - 20% Maintaining the facilities 38% 5% - - Did not know - - 10% - No challenge 8% - - -
- 5. A conceptual framework for accounting costs !5 Pre-Restoration & Restoration Activities Socio-Economic & Ecological Challenges Variable CostsFixed Costs Total Costs of Peatlands Restoration Costs to Address Challenges DIRECT COSTS INDIRECT COSTS
- 6. Dyah Puspitaloka (dp735@nau.edu) • bit.ly/CentralKalimantanPeatlands Photo: Puspitaloka (2017) Photo: Waring (2017) Transboundary benefits of peatland restoration substantiate the needs for international, national, and regional commitments and supports.