Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Viewers also liked(20)

Similar to Social forestry for resilience? Lessons from Indonesia (Laos and Vietnam)(20)

Advertisement

More from CIFOR-ICRAF(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

Social forestry for resilience? Lessons from Indonesia (Laos and Vietnam)

  1. Social Forestry for resilience? Lessons from Indonesia, (Laos and Vietnam) Moira Moeliono, Cynthia Maharani, Indah Waty, Grace Wong and Maria Brockhaus RESILIENCE2017 Conference-Stockholm 21-23 August 2017
  2. Background • SE Asia, forest dependent people; traditional forest management practices • ASFCC project argue that swidden is part of the traditional systems CAS/SES • Governments argue that swidden is a direct cause of deforestation and often bans the practice • Swidden and traditional forest mgt practices are changing as they become more integrated in national and global systems (land use plans), intro of large scale industrial crops, commodification of land; infrastructure and other development projects •  deforestation and forest degradation • Governments are introducing CF/SF defined as any situation which intimately involves local people in a forestry activity” from subsistence collecting of NTFPs to commercial growing of trees (Arnold, 1992) RQ: Government programs replace traditional systems: will it be effective? Sustainable?
  3. Framework (Biggs et al, 2012) • to alleviate poverty of forest dependent people, • to secure access to, and ownership of the resources and their benefits • to improve the condition of the forests • SF/CF for adaptation and mitigation of climate change
  4. Traditional systems (Indonesia case) Role of Agency and adaptive systems But already changing shortened fallows, loss of biodiversity, loss of interest
  5. CF/SF as government program • CF/SF as permit system, more sectoral and isolated from other policies • Uniform models • Participative? Structure over agency loss of flexibility
  6. Conclusion Government SF/CF programs be more effective and sustainable if: • Government would allow more flexible arrangements, i.e. allow more local autonomy; • Integrates the key principles in design of SF policies especially allow learning and experimentation (eg Vietnam and pilots) • SF alone is not enough to achieve the objectives of poverty reduction, improved forest management and adaptation and mitigation of climate change
  7. cifor.org blog.cifor.org ForestsTreesAgroforestry.org For more information: www.cifor.org/asfcc
Advertisement