A seminar presented in June 2012 for clients of Rave Mobile Safety. Provides research-based insights into how to effectively reach college students with campus emergency information.
Communicating with College Students in Emergencies 062012
1. Alert! Best Practices in
Emergency Notification
Webinar sponsored by
Rave Mobile Safety
June 20, 2012
2. Growing Public Concerns about
Awareness of Campus Safety
1986 – Jeanne Clery murdered at Lehigh University
1990 – Clery Act becomes law
2007 – Virginia Tech shootings
2008 – Eastern Michigan Univ. fined - Laura Dickinson
murder
3. “It Can’t Happen Here” – or could it?
Feb. 16, 2010
Photo: Harry Scull Jr./The Buffalo News
4. What did we learn?
1. Emergency alerting system worked
well.
2. Social media moved faster than
we could.
3. No one was harmed – but it was
national news anyway.
4. It didn’t end when the police cars
rolled away - there was a second-
day story.
5. How can we do a better job of
notifying people during
emergencies?
6. Research Questions
1. What motivates students to enroll in an
alert system?
2. Do students prefer text messaging or
social media? Why?
3. Are there any meaningful
differences based on demographics?
4. What influences students to
obey the instructions we send?
7. University at Buffalo survey
Surveyed 572 students (Fall
2010)
• 53% female, 47% male
• 65% U.S., 35%
international
• 66% undergraduate, 34%
graduate/ professional
• Wide variety of majors
and class years
Focus groups (Fall 11)
8. Knowing about alert system isn’t
enough to drive sign-ups
8%
Not
subscribed
37%
Aware of system Subscribed
92% 63%
9. Reasons to enroll
Students say they enroll in order to
• Feel safer
• Be better prepared for emergencies
• Get a good value for the cost
Not because they’re afraid or believe
themselves to be at risk!
15. What channels do students prefer?
We presented five scenarios and asked for each, would
you want the alert to be delivered by text message
or by social media (or both).
• Snowstorm
• Shooting
• Building problem (fire, gas leak)
• Health issue (swine flu, water contamination)
• Crime on campus (robbery, purse snatching)
16. 85% Students want both channels,
but tend to prefer text
messaging
60%
Text message Social media
17. Why do students choose social media?
Social media is preferred for:
• Richer content (videos, photos, etc.)
• Interactive (ask questions, confirm
information, check on welfare of
friends)
18. Why do students prefer text
messaging?
Text messaging is preferred for:
• Trustworthy information
• Accurate
• Relevant
• Timely
19. Does incident type affect channel choice?
Type of incident – and perceived risk - doesn’t affect
choice.
• Natural vs. man-made
• Scope and impact (more or less critical)
• Intentional or accidental
Implication: choose channels for what they can do –
not what kind of incident you have
20. Who influences student behavior?
“Regarding campus emergencies, I would care what
___________ think I should do.”
1. University officials
2. My parents
3. Other people who are important to me
4. My professors
5. My friends
21. International students
More likely to prefer social media for
• Rich content
• Ability to interact with a
community online
Perceive higher levels of risk from
campus emergencies, for
themselves and their friends
Are more concerned about what
influential others expect
22. Women vs. Men
Female students were more likely to:
• Trust the information they receive
during a campus emergency.
• Perceive higher levels of risk to
themselves or their friends.
• Believe that signing up for the
emergency alert system will be
beneficial.
• Are more concerned about what
influential others expect them to do.
23. What influences students to comply?
Subjective
Norm
Safety
Threat Intention to
comply with
alerts
Financial
Threat
Information
Trust
Predicts Does Not
Compliance Predict
24. What does it mean for practitioners?
Image source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FEMA_-_32414_-
_FEMA_press_conference_at_the_opening_of_a_disaster_recovery_center_in_Queens.jpg
25. Improve your subscription rates
1. Sell the benefits
2. Use influential others
3. Take advantage of seasonal demand
26. Offer multiple channels
1. Students want both kinds of channels
• One to many
• Many to many
2. They want different things from each
• Authoritative information
• Ability to verify – and check on each other
3. Improve students’ ability to receive messages
• Inform them of the available channels.
• Ask faculty to allow texts to be received in class
27. Demographics matter.
• Cultural and gender norms matter in emergency
communications.
• Tailoring by group is difficult – instead, use multiple
channels.
28. Use the power of leaders
to guide behavior
Students rate “university officials” as the most
influential figures during emergencies.
AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast
29. Driving Compliance
1. Establish compliance as the norm on your campus.
• Help students see that others are complying.
• Ask faculty and staff to model the behavior.
2. Zealously guard the quality of your information.
• People are more likely to comply if they believe
the message is credible, relevant and timely.
30. Limitations
Additional research is needed
- to confirm these insights
- to explore them in greater detail
- to learn more about compliance
Data was taken from only one university -
- things might be different where you
are
31. Sources
Han, W., Ada, S., Sharman, R., Rao, H. R., and Brennan, J., “Critical
Factors Affecting Compliance to Campus Alerts”, International
Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2011), Shanghai, China,
December 4-7, 2011.
Han, W., Ada, S., Sharman, R., Rao, H. R., and Brennan, J., “Critical
Success Factors to Improve Compliance with Campus Emergency
Notifications”, 17th Americas Conference on Information Systems
(AMCIS), Detroit, Michigan, August, 2011
Ada, S., Rao, H., R., Sharman, R., “Online Social Networking Site (Sns)
Use at the Campus Emergencies, International Conference on
Inforamation Systems (ICIS), St. Louis, Dec. 2010.
What motivates students to enroll in an alert system?How can we better persuade students to enroll?What influences students to obey the instructions we send?How can we increase compliance with emergency instructions?Do students prefer one-to-many channels (text messaging) or many-to-many channels (social media)? Why?How and when should we use social networking as part of our array of emergency communications?Are there any meaningful differences based on demographics?Should we communicate differently with men vs. women? Domestic vs. international? Research Questions
572 students surveyed in Fall 201053% female, 47% male65% U.S., 35% international66% undergraduate, 34% graduate/professionalWide variety of majors and class yearsWe believe this to be the first large-scale empirical study of its kind.
Reasons why “awares” say they don’t enroll - from focus groups:ForgotEmail is enoughDon’t use text messagingDon’t need it
We found that perception of risk didn’t drive channel choice, and we theorize it also doesn’t drive enrollment. This is consistent with Risk Communication Theory (Covallo).
How we formerly marketed the alert program – trying to stimulate perception of risk. It didn’t work well.
After the research, we changed our messaging to emphasize “benefits” like staying save
Here is some more data from announcements incl. promos and alerts we ran in MyUB… Aug. 28-Sep. 11, 2009 messages about H1N1 outbreak Sep. 10-27, 2009 MyUB promotional announcements Nov. 16-Dec. 6, 2009 MyUB promotional announcements Dec. 21, 2009 - Jan. 17, 2010 MyUB promotional announcements Feb. 19 - Mar. 18, 2010 we ran several MyUB promotional announcements Aug 2010 we had a long-running MyUB promo -- 50-100 clicks a day, peaked Aug 23-29 with 150-230 clicks a day late nov 2010 we had two high profile Alertsan attempted purse snatching -- high traffic Nov 17-20 (900+3000+600+230 clicks)robbery on South Campus -- high traffic Nov 29-30 (1000+1700 clicks) Feb. 14-20, 2011 MyUB promotional announcementsMay 2, 2011 Downed Power Line May 17, 2011 UB Alert about sporadic power outages Sep 11, 2011 Campus SuspectSep. 12-18, 2011 MyUB promotional announcements (during the 911 time period… these attracted 1300 clicks) Oct. 1, 2011 UB Alerts about "UB Police Investigating an Assault" Oct. 9, 2011 UB Alerts about "Strong-Arm Robbery Reported Sunday on North Campus" Oct. 13-19, 2011 we ran a test of alert system (these attracted 86 clicks… ) Dec 13, 2011 Power OutageJan. 10-15, 2012 MyUB promotional announcements Feb. 23, 2012 UB Alerts about "Armed Robbery on North Campus" Mar 1, 2012 Red Jacket Evacuation
Here is some more data from announcements incl. promos and alerts we ran in MyUB… Aug. 28-Sep. 11, 2009 messages about H1N1 outbreak Sep. 10-27, 2009 MyUB promotional announcements Nov. 16-Dec. 6, 2009 MyUB promotional announcements Dec. 21, 2009 - Jan. 17, 2010 MyUB promotional announcements Feb. 19 - Mar. 18, 2010 we ran several MyUB promotional announcements Aug 2010 we had a long-running MyUB promo -- 50-100 clicks a day, peaked Aug 23-29 with 150-230 clicks a day late nov 2010 we had two high profile Alertsan attempted purse snatching -- high traffic Nov 17-20 (900+3000+600+230 clicks)robbery on South Campus -- high traffic Nov 29-30 (1000+1700 clicks) Feb. 14-20, 2011 MyUB promotional announcementsMay 2, 2011 Downed Power Line May 17, 2011 UB Alert about sporadic power outages Sep 11, 2011 Campus SuspectSep. 12-18, 2011 MyUB promotional announcements (during the 911 time period… these attracted 1300 clicks) Oct. 1, 2011 UB Alerts about "UB Police Investigating an Assault" Oct. 9, 2011 UB Alerts about "Strong-Arm Robbery Reported Sunday on North Campus" Oct. 13-19, 2011 we ran a test of alert system (these attracted 86 clicks… ) Dec 13, 2011 Power OutageJan. 10-15, 2012 MyUB promotional announcements Feb. 23, 2012 UB Alerts about "Armed Robbery on North Campus" Mar 1, 2012 Red Jacket Evacuation
Animate this… number the choices?Raj and Wen are working on a paper to explain why these influencers…
Subjective norm promotes compliance for all types except robbery. Information trust is associated with compliance for all types except snowstorm.Students listen to their friends and families because they trust the people care about them. Many male students think that when someone they know tell them about the information, it feels more relevant than text message. For female students, in severe incidents such as active shooter, they feel extreme fear and panic. They are likely to listen to the people around them or people they know. Informational trust is another important factor. The message send to students need to be relevant, accurate, timely, with clear instructions that students can act upon. Students should aware of the channel, such as a fixed telephone number or email address.
In classrooms, faculty are telling students to turn off the laptop/cell phones. We need to make use of technology in the class rooms.