Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

DSD-INT 2019 Using Hypothetical Snowball Earth Conditions as a Sanity Check on Sea Ice Models-Rasmus

20 views

Published on

Presentation by Kai Rasmus, Luode Consulting Oy, Finland, at the Delft3D - User Days (Day 2: Hydrodynamics), during Delft Software Days - Edition 2019. Tuesday, 12 November 2019, Delft.

Published in: Software
  • Be the first to comment

DSD-INT 2019 Using Hypothetical Snowball Earth Conditions as a Sanity Check on Sea Ice Models-Rasmus

  1. 1. Using Hypothetical Snowball Earth Conditions as a Sanity Check on Sea Ice Models Kai Rasmus, Luode Consulting Oy, Finland Credits also go to: Joose Mykkänen, Luode Consulting Oy, Finland Reimer de Graaff, Deltares Erik de Goede, Deltares
  2. 2. Introductory slide • First we will talk about Snowball Earth • Then an anecdote needs to be given • The Delft3D ice-model will be presented • Some validation results • Finally the results of Delft3D ice-model simulation in Snowball Earth conditions will be given • Then the presentation will end
  3. 3. Snowball Earth A hypothesis
  4. 4. Snowball Earth, what? • 3-4 periods in Earth’s history when it has been totally ice-covered • The last one was in the Proterozoic era 650 million years ago • The hypothesis argue that it best explains sedimentary deposits generally regarded as of glacial origin at tropical palaeolatitudes • Formation related to the global carbon cycle on geological timescales • Due to the distribution of continents, the tropical ocean was relatively shallow • i.e. perfect for a Delft3D application
  5. 5. A nut shell description • Carbon dioxide fixing -> sedimentation of organic matter -> sedimentary rock formation -> plate tectonic movement -> uplift into volcanic regions -> ejection of carbon from volcanoes
  6. 6. An Anecdote Let this be a lesson to you all
  7. 7. Way back in the beginning of this century… • I was working as a PhD student at the University of Helsinki on the optical properties of ice and snow • A Snowball Earth guru from America came to give us a presentation on it • He made a point that at tropical latitudes the ice would still be thin enough for photosynthesis to still be possible (a prerequisite for life as we know it today to exist) • I thought: ”Hey, this is easy to test with our models”
  8. 8. And so • I setup the University of Helsinki ice model for Snowball Earth conditions by mainly setting the global air temperature to negative values and setting the ocean depth to something small similar to Proterozoic conditions • The result was that ice didn’t really grow at the equator • My conclusion then was that the model was not working 
  9. 9. However • Then papers with similar results to mine started to come out
  10. 10. Even one in Nature
  11. 11. And a corresponding letter
  12. 12. Some observations from the literature • McKay (GRL, 2000) found that when applying models developed for the Antarctic dry lakes to Snowball Earth conditions, the ice thickness would be 10m or less and photsynthesis would still be possible. • Hyde et al (Nature, 2000) find that when a general circulation model is included then a belt of open water is formed at the equator even though ice sheets could extend that far. • Lewis et al (JGR, 2007) find that when dynamics are included then a hard snowball Earth (total ice cover) is more probable. When only thermodynamics are considered then a soft snowball (some open water) is possible.
  13. 13. So I was on the right track after all • The moral of this story is that always publish your results ☺ • Also even though you do not subscribe to the Snowball Earth hypothesis (as many don’t) then it does give one a platform for testing ice-models This is me still not subscribing to the Snowball Earth hypothesis
  14. 14. Delft3D ice-model Serious science Also I have Reimer de Graaff and Erik de Goede to thank for this part
  15. 15. Delft3D Sea Ice Model Atmosphere (wind, air temp/press., solar rad.,..) Hydrodynamics 2DH/3D currents temperature/salinity properties weathering advection spreading wave forces frequency Morphology bed changes Water quality Ice / snow accumulation melting advection internal stress transport processes Waves Oil
  16. 16. Delft3D Sea Ice Model Combination of 2DH/3D hydrodynamic model (Delft3D) with: 1. Thermodynamic model (vertical) based On a single ice layer concept with or without snow on top An extension of the Delft3D thermodynamic module 2. Dynamic model (horizontal) based on The elastic-viscous-plastic (EVP) sea-ice rheology Based on open-source Lim3 code from Belgium (advanced Louvain-la-Neuve Sea Ice Model)
  17. 17. Numerical implementation in Delft3D-FLOW • ice ≈ floating structure (rigid lid approach) • including drying and flooding • same time step as hydrodynamic model (dynamic modelling) • same computational grid and depth as hydrodynamic model • wind/currents act on ice (where present)
  18. 18. Validation – Sea ice thickness
  19. 19. Validation – Sea ice extent Satellite image reference USGS/NASA Landsat Program, SYKE
  20. 20. Validation – Lake ice thickness
  21. 21. Ice model – some observations • The ice model seems to be working in present day conditions • Thickness data still not generally available, especially for freeze and thaw periods • A problem for validation • Ice extent can be obtained from satellite images • Snow has a large impact on the ice growth • Snow-ice formation component not implemented • Snow-ice can be more than 50% of the overall thickness • The ice model does not have boundary conditions implemented yet
  22. 22. What We Use it For and Why • Study of ice effects of thermal discharges • Development of factories • Development of powerplants • The ice model is usually included if an overwinter simulation is made • Ice has a recreational usage component that needs to be conserved if possible
  23. 23. Delft3D Ice Model in Snowball Earth conditions The actual purpose of this presentation
  24. 24. Setup for Hypothetical Snowball Earth Conditions • Rectilinear grid setup from latitude 25°S to 25°N and longitude 50°E to 100°E • Air temperature set to -25°C globally • Northern winter (from December onwards) • 2 senarios: • No wind – equal to a purely thermodynamic model • Wind varying with latitude in direction • Dynamic ice • The models were run for 4 months to achieve a steady state
  25. 25. Results
  26. 26. Results • With no wind the Southern hemisphere is ice free • The southern summer sun is able to melt the ice that is formed during the night. • Delft3D does not produce thermohaline circulation (nor is it built to do so) • If the model is run over the Northern summer then the Southern hemisphere should freeze as well • The dynamic (with wind) model produces as at all latitudes except for a thin band at the equator • The wind increases coolling at the surface • The wind causes currents which redistribute heat • The latitudinal distribution of ice is a result of the fictional wind distribution • Different winds would produce a different distribution
  27. 27. Comparison With Measurements • Deltares has not released its ice observations from 650 million years BC • We are still waiting
  28. 28. Conclusions • The Delft3D ice model is able to simulate present day conditions • In its current form it does not produce euqatorial ice in Snowball Earth conditions • This result is in line with other research • The Delft3D ice model is sane • Always publish your results

×