Sympathy In Grapes Of Wrath And The Elephant Man

Sympathy In Grapes Of Wrath And The Elephant Man
Many stories have happy times and many stories are more depressing than sad. When I thought of this, two stories made me think about the times in
the story when we feel more empathetic than sympathetic. Those two stories were Grapes of Wrath and The Elephant Man. Both stories show the
main characters as people who don't have much and can live a healthy and comfortable life. In The Elephant Man, John Merrick is used as an
attraction for people to look in awe at. In Grapes of Wrath, the homeless man can't pay the full price to get a loaf of bread. These two stories show
both characters in bad situations and don't have enough money However, out of these two, I believe Elephant Man would evoke more empathy to the
reader. The first reason why...show more content...
He is treated like a circus animal and was even taken to a hospital to be evaluated more properly . This is evident when the says, "I must examine
him further at the hospital. Here is my card. I'm Treves. I will have a cab pick him up and return him. My card will gain him admittance. Five bob
he's yours for the day. I wish to examine him in the interests of science, you see. Sir, I'm Ross. I look out for him, get him his living. Found him in
Leicester workhouse. His own ma put him there age of three. Couldn't bear the sight, well you can see why. We–he and I–are in business. He is our
capital, see. Go to a bank. Go anywhere. Want to borrow capital, you pay interest. Scientists even. He's good value though. You won't find another
like him. Fair enough. [He pays.] Right. Out here, Merrick. Ya bloody donkey, out!" This textual evidence shows that Ross has no regard for his
well being and just sends out Merrick so that Treves can observe his condition. This textual evidence also shows that Ross doesn't seem to care about
or respect Merrick as a person or as an
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Themes: Joseph Merrick and Elephant Man Essay
Breaking through the Blindness: A Fight for Freedom The three short stories we read, The Elephant in the Village of Blind, 20/20, and The Cathedral,
all have many common themes with the movie The Elephant man. What intrigues me the most is the hidden underlining meaning each and every story
carries. There are three prominent themes I would like to discuss, the figurative and the literal blindness of the characters in the works, enlightenment,
and the freedom the characters experience throughout each individual piece. The themes also go hand in hand because one cannot learn a lesson
without achieving enlightenment, and cannot free themselves if there is no blinding barrier. The one prominent similarity in all the works is the
blindness...show more content...
Even though sometimes people are deceived by other aspects and judge hashly by first impression, eventually they will surely change their
perspective to understand things more clearly. There are times when one's vision is blinded due to the lack of experience, but once they cross that
barrier they surely reach enlightenment. The four young mothers sitting on the bench, in the story The Elephant in the Village of the Blind, came to
a realization that the elephant in fact is not a scary creature but an enormous, gentle ox with a stretched nose. If the villagers would have never given
the elephant a chance, they would have been blinded from the idea of a dangerous elephant and probably would not have been delightfully
enlightened to find out how gentle the elephant is. Bill, in 20/20, gets enlightened towards the end of the story. Even though at first he found Ruthie's
imagination and her vision naive, he decided to drive and try t see the world from Ruthie's perspective. At the end of the story The Cathedral, Robert
says " It's really something" to the experience he received by drawing the cathedral blindfolded. He judged the blind man from the beginning and did
not like the fact that the man was in his house, but eventually he realizes how much he was missing out on and was enlightened by the experience of
drawing blindfolded. We also see the same occurrence in the movie The Elephant man, the whole town

Theme Of Colonialism In Shooting An Elephant
Introduction: George Orwell's Shooting an Elephant is undoubtedly a vivid demonstration of the impact of colonialism and imperialism on both the
coloniser and the colonised. The narrator of the story initially poses as a common man who is torn between his dual characteristics of a sensible
human being and a typical saviour, posing dummy for the native people. Simultaneously, he felt an intense dislike for the native people for their surly
attitude and direct exhibition of abhorrence towards the colonisers and a strong sense of aversion for the tyranny and oppressive ways of the British
raj. The narrator describes his experiences during his stay in Burma from his own perspective. He also tries to rationalise his actions, killing an elephant,
...show more content...
The narrator unwittingly made derogatory remarks about the local people like–'No one had the guts to raise a riot. 'It is also true that the anti
–European feeling was very harsh as the native people humiliated them in different ways like spitting betel juice over a white lady's dress, or jeering
and making embarrassing remarks at them. Though he faced perplexing and upsetting encounters with local people, the deprecatory and
underestimating tone of the narrator is inescapably noticed in his words like–'The wretched prisoners huddling in the stinking cages,' 'the grey, 'cowed
faces of the long term convicts', 'it would be the greatest joy to drive a bayonet through the Buddhist priest's guts.' Considering his remarks it is easy
to realise that repressed ethnocentrism regulated his mind .From a postcolonial perspective it can be surmised that the narrator's tone obviously evokes
a sense of superiority which also justifies the fact that western values ,tradition thoughts and literature are often guilty of repressive ethnocentrism. The
quintessence of the fact is Rudyard Kipling's poem 'The White Man's Burden :The United States and Philippine Island, published in McClure's in
1889.It is a propaganda for white people who are solely to be entrusted with the responsibility to uplift

Elephant Man Trial
A person has died and 5 others have been hospitalized in France, after taking part in a clinical study for a new painkiller formulated by BIAL, a
Portuguese pharmaceutical company . The men were admitted to the Rennes University Hospital in western France on 11th Feb. One man was said to
be brain–dead as a consequence of the investigational drug, and on 17th of Feb, the hospital released a statement stating his passing. The other 5 men
are believed to be in a stable situation, though French health authorities have cautioned that 3 of them may be left with permanent brain damage.
French prosecutors say they have now extended their investigations into the clinical study to include possible manslaughter charges. The phase 1
clinical study...show more content...
A additional five trial individuals will undergo medical examination. Incident may increase questions about clinical trial processes This is not the initial
time an early–stage clinical study has lead to adverse outcomes. In 2006, a phase 1 clinical study performed in London, UK – dubbed the "Elephant
Man trial" – lead to six young men being treated for multiple organ failure inside hours of getting a drug known as TGN1412, developed to fight
autoimmune disease and leukemia. Manufactured by pharmaceutical organization TeGenero Immuno Therapeutics, the drug lead to one man losing his
fingers and toes, while all men were informed they would probably develop cancers or autoimmune diseases in the long run because of their exposure
to the drug. It should be observed, however, that such severities in early–stage drug studies are rare, though this latest event is probably to increase
questions about the safety of such studies and whether there should be more stringent procedural strategies in

The white man's burden is an idea that the white men have a job to take care of the uncivilized beings and develop them to be a more socially
endowed race. Their belief that they are superior to the natives is where this is rooted. This idea excused racism and portrayed it as more of a positive
element in our society, rather than the destructive mechanism that it actually is. It also caused white men to truly believe that they are better than any
other race out there. In "Shooting an Elephant," by George Orwell, the narrator's brain is subconsciously imbedded with this notion. He claims to be
opposed to imperialism and everything about it while also hating his job and the people associated with it. These two things cannot go hand in hand.
The narrator claims that he hates imperialism in the beginning of the text. He secretly rooted for the Burmese, which were the natives in this area, and
hoped they would break free of the oppressor. This could cause the reader to instantly sympathize or start to like the narrator because it makes them
believe that he's not a bad guy.
On the contrary, he also expresses his disdain for the natives that he is always surrounded by. He claims that due to his profession, he is often a target
for ridicule and harassment. Once while he was playing football, a Burmese man intentionally tripped him and the referee looked the other way. The
narrator also talks about how there are young Buddhist priests who stand on street corners and make fun of

The Elephant Man Essay
Consequences from Craving The consequences of the desire to be accepted is a critical theme in "The Elephant Man" by Bernard Pomerance. The
desire to be accepted leads to the loss of hope and the establishment of a negative environment. The need also provokes depression which negatively
affects the host. Failing to satisfy this desire is the root cause of the multiple consequences. Merrick is a victim of these obstacles; consequence after
consequence arise for Merrick, as he craves to fulfill his desire. An unpleasant transformation of Merrick occurs as his desire to be accepted, promote
the diminishing of hope and amplify the amount of depression. Failing to fulfill the desire to be accepted results in a character losing hope; a character
...show more content...
The unfulfilled desire to be accepted fosters the development of negative thoughts and consequently, harms the host. Hopeless Merrick, starts to
view only the negatives of his surroundings. When Treves brings Mrs. Kendal to make Merrick feel more accepted, no positives are recognized
by Merrick. Merrick is aware that Mrs. Kendal is an actress and views that Treves had to make someone pretend for Merrick to feel more accepted.
Inorganic encounters with the people Treves summons are recognized by Merrick. Realizing that his need to be accepted cannot be fulfilled,
Merrick becomes depressed as the stage directions state on page 35 that, "[a]s the lights fade Merrick sobs soundlessly, uncontrollably.". During
this part of the play, Merrick is crying because he knows that Mrs. Kendal is acting to try to make him feel better. Treves actions are ironic as he
attempts to make Merrick feel more accepted but instead produces the opposite. Immense depression resulting from the unfulfilled desire to be
accepted eventually destroys a character. Although it is not clear how Merrick died, it is most probable that Merrick died due to his mass depression.
Merrick's unfulfilled desire to be accepted ate away at him and he eventually perished. Depression is a direct consequence of failed attempts at trying
to be accepted and is linked with

The Elephant Man By David Lynch
Movies and novels deal with many serious real life issues these days, people with disabilities are no exception, and this is all fine but it all matters if
the issue is accurate and non–offensive. Well despite what many people think, most media representations of disabled people these days are accurate.
There are numerous amount of films and novels that feature disabled people and here are some reasons why they are accurate.
First and foremost, media representations don't just go from film to novels, they can also be depicted in forms such as radio dramas and videogames, it
can also not just a mental disability, but also physical.Physical disabilities are shown in such films as "The Elephant man" and even video games
such as "Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain" "The Elephant Man" is a 1980 film directed by David Lynch that depicts the story of Joseph
Merrick (It was based on a true story,) a man who was born with an extremely rare physical disability that completely deformed his face, making him
look almost like an elephant, one of the quotes in the film is "I am not an elephant! I am not an animal! I am a human being! I am a man!" This
shows that not matter how different you look or what society thinks of you, at the end of the day, you are just the same as every other human, doesn 't
matter how different you look, so the Elephant Man is an extremely accurate film depiction of the life and death of Joseph Merrick. But that's not
saying that there are just physical

Comparing The Elephant Man And Justin
The author compares the Elephant man and Justin because when they were at the bus stop, Jack went to go get a piece of gum from the store across
the street were the bus stop is at. Julian and his friends saw Jack in the store and waited for him to come out. When Jack came out of the store, they
followed him for a short period of time and then ran away laughing and high fiving eachother. Just like in the elephant man were the people were
following him around until he got to the train station, is when they stopped following him and then they stood around him. Justin also used to take the
train station when he was little. In the beginning of part 5, when Justin was introduced to Auggie, Justin was a little surprised because he didn't think

Elephant the movie Essay
Gus Van Sant's Elephant was at once critically praised and denounced by both film reviewers and filmgoers alike. The cinematography takes you on a
waltz throughout a seemingly typical day at an unnamed high school, stopping through the journey to focus on the stereotypes of school. The jock, the
quirky artist, the cliqued girls, the skateboarder, they are all represented and representative of his film. Van Sant created a film, seemingly without a
staunch opinion on the horrors of the Columbine shootings. The movie seems distanced from the actors and their actions: an unaware participant from
the tranquil introduction to the gruesome climax. His seeming lack of a purpose, lack of a reason for the creation of this film, is exactly the...show more
content...
Van Sant's film aestheticizes the reality of high school, focusing on its beauty and character, and ignoring the underlying grime inherent on most
campuses. The halls and yard of the school are kept in immaculate condition, staying unnaturally clean, almost sterile for a school. Despite this
seeming glorification of the building, the hallways are kept as a constant secondary to the sharply focused characters the camera constantly follows. It
takes the focus away from the bare walls and empty hallways and places it solely on the students. The film isn't about the location that it occurred, but
the people that it happened to. The focus is on the students of the film, both literally and figuratively. The camera seems to never stop moving, save
for brief pauses that seem to rest the viewer. There is little extraneous distraction from the characters as they walk down the hall; the only time
something distracts from the center of attention is when it is repeated again as the film goes through its several cycles that repeat scenes from different
points of view.
The film intertwines the lives of its multiple points of view. They all seem to be unrelated, but they ultimately tie together in a cohesive storyline that
unravels into its unavoidable conclusion. Each person follows his or her own timeline until it reaches the point

Elephant Man Essay
Ashley Montagu tells John Merrick&#8217;s unusual story in the book that studies human dignity, The Elephant Man. The Elephant Man, an
intriguing book that captures the heart of the spirit, is the story of a simple, yet unfortunate, man. It causes one to think about life&#8217;s
precious gifts and how often they are taken for granted. As the sad and unique story of John Merrick, &#8220;the elephant man,'; unfolds, all are
taught a lesson about strength and courage.
When Sir Frederick Treeves first discovered John Merrick in 1884, he could only be described as, &#8220;a huddled mass of loneliness';(14).
Merrick had a horrible disease called elephantiasis. This extreme misfortune caused...show more content...
With the help of his new friend Frederick Treeves, he even attended plays and went for walks. He lived happily at the hospital for almost seven more
years where compassionate people frequently visited him. Even people of royalty paid him visits. No matter how ill treated he may have been, no one
ever heard John Merrick complain about his hideous looks or his horrible life. With outstanding endurance, he proves to the world what a truly heroic
person can do.
The Elephant Man, an intriguing and well–written book, also captures the true essence of John Merrick&#8217;s life. The context of the book
asserts descriptiveness and easily captures the interest of the reader. When Treeves first viewed the &#8220;elephant man,'; he states:
The showman pulled back the curtain and revealed a bent figure crouching on a stool and covered by a brown blanket. In front of it, on a tripod, was
a large brick heated by a Bunsen burner. Over this the creature was huddled to warm itself . . . this hunched–up figure was the embodiment of
loneliness (47).
Descriptions such as these paint the sad but vivid picture of the life John Merrick led. While writing his story, Montagu made a point of using
photographic words to set up the scene he wanted to describe. His detailed writings helped the story move along. In addition to the viewpoint of
Frederick Treeves, Montagu included many other

Bernard Pomerance and the Elephant Man
Bernard Pomerance was born in 1940 in Brooklyn, New York. He attended college at the University of Chicago, where he received a degree in
English. In the 1970's Pomerance moved to London, England to become a novelist. He was unsuccessful and then decided to try his hand as a
dramatist. He quickly got involved with several left–wing fringe groups, which where at the time thriving in England. Then, along with director Ronald
Rees, he founded the Foco Nove Theater group. Throughout Pomeranc's career nearly all of his plays were at one time preformed at his Foco Novo
theater..
Pomerance became fairly successful as a play write. His first play, High in Vietnam Hot Damn, was first produced by the...show more content...
The movie was also popular and received high praise. John Hurt, Anthony Hopkins, Wendy Hiller, and Anne Bancraft all stared in the movie and did
an excellent job. Although the movie was as popular as the play, it was extemely different. One of the major problems with the movie is the
makeup of John Merrick, the main character. Because it is a movie they can not rely on the theatricalness of the play. Merrick's character is forced
to where a horrible costume which makes him almost to difficult to look at. This makes it very different from the play because in the play it is
extremely important that the actor does nothing to make himself look the way the real John Merrick looked. In 1980, in one of the most famous
productions of The Elephant Man, the main character of John Merrick was played by David Bowie. Merrick's character is extremely difficult to
play. The entire play, including the tittle is based on the deformities of John Merrick, yet the actor who preforms his roll is forced to do so using no
padding or makeup to make himself look deformed. They must rely solely on their talent to persuade the audience to believe how terrible he looks. It
is imperative to the play that they do not ware any kind of costume to make themselves look deformed. The only thing they are allowed to do is bend
their bodies. Anything else is believed to take away form the play tremendously.
The Elephant Man is a true story inspired by a man named John Merrick.

An Elephant Crackup Summary
If you're not paying attention, the mind can be a tricky labyrinth. The less you know about it, the more inexplicable and frightening it becomes. For
example, why do seemingly benign elephants wreak havoc upon villages? In "An Elephant Crackup," Charles Siebert explores the aberrant nature of
these elephants and correlates them to their traumatizing upbringing, deprived of community and kinship. The biochemistry of the human mind,
analyzed in "Love2.0" by Barbara Frederickson, serves as a worthy addendum to Siebert's conjecture. "Love2.0" explains that the brain, hormones, and
nerves work in unison to build emotional fortitude, stimulate oneself, and express positivity resonance. Siebert's ideas of elephant culture and
trans–species psyche can put Frederickson's theory of emotions into practice. The absence of certain hormones within elephants, provided their
fragmented community, can explain their volatile outbreaks. Alternatively, the reinstitution of human parental roles into elephant culture can help
reconstruct their broken emotional states of elephants and rebuild their resilience; this healing process can also extend to humans. "Love2.0" opens
with an interesting analogy comparing love to a vital nutrient, "The more you experience it, the more you open up and grow, becoming wiser and more
attuned, more resilient and effective, happier and healthier" (Frederickson 107). Oxytocin, "the great facilitator of life," is one of Frederickson's three
critical components of

Blind Men And The Elephant Essay
It was six men of Indostan
To learning much inclined,
Who went to see the Elephant
(Though all of them were blind),
That each by observation
Might satisfy his mind.
The poem "The Blind Men and the Elephant" by John Godfrey Saxe (1816–1887). The parable implies that one's subjective experience can be true, but
that such experience is inherently limited by its failure to account for a totality of truth. This parable occurs to my mind when I try to explain the
Image of God in my life. God reveals parts of himself to me in each experiences. I am fully assured that God's self–communication have penetrated
deeply into my life but I have never been able to understand Him totally.
As clear as I remembered, I was a dearest and favored great grandchild...show more content...
My only ambition was to become a nun unlike other classmate (mostly Buddhism). Then after grade 9, I myself decided to enter Convent. To
follow my aim, I had to be formed in formation program around 6 years and other 2 years in novitiate house which I undoubtedly passed through
with many crossroads. In 2000 I professed as religious sister. My first two years as a junior sister was amazing adventures. I was eager to work
effectively. I worked in a parish and school half day and continued studying in college for bachelor degree in evening. Unfortunately, in my third
year I was burned out by tiring working and studying. It made me be confused about my vacation. I became a religious sister already. I completed
my goal. What was the next? I lost my ambition. This idea poisonously infiltrated into my mind and depressed me. During monthly meeting with
my spiritual director who is Redemptorist priest, I told him what I worried about. I was afraid that I had no genuine vocation. He answered with
his experience as young priest. He told me that I asked wrong question to myself all along. It was not what my goal was, but it is about who my
initial Goal is. I should step forward to be intimately to my Goal who I long to meet Him in my very last day as a faithful

For every activity one does, time is very important for the activity. In stories, chronology is especially important for it helps the reader understand
what is happening but also gains a message from it. Chronological order is part of the plot diagram in any story where the story begins which takes
the reader to rising action. The author of Elephant, Slawomir Mrozek and the author of The Secret Lost in the Water, Roch Carrier showed how
chronology is very important to the story. These authors used different themes to portray chronology. This can be demonstrated through the loss of
faith, psychology of believing and through appearance vs reality. Therefore, variations of chronology have been shown. Moreover, chronology is
very important to the story and this is shown through the loss of faith in characters. In the story, The Elephant, there are zoo keepers who know
there are kids coming to their zoo who want to see an elephant. However they did not have one so they blew a balloon elephant instead. This tricked
the kids until it popped and caused disappointment to arise in the children. "The school children who had witnesses the scene in the zoo soon
started neglecting their studies and turned into hooligans" (Mrozek 106). This demonstrates how the past events made the kids into terrible people.
They believe whatever they learned as a child was all untrue and they feel as if their whole life is a lie. They begin to lose faith in what they
learned and give up on their lives. On the other hand, Roch Carrier demonstrated loss of faith through the protagonist. The protagonist learned
something from his father on how to find fresh water. However the main character forgets his father's tactics and is unable to find fresh water
underground. "Somewhere along the roads I'd taken since the village of my childhood I had forgotten my father's knowledge" (Carrier 96). This
quote shows how this character is losing faith. He cannot believe how he forgot his dad's secret technique and now believes that he has learned
nothing from his dad. He feels worthless. These two books show how both characters in both stories have lost faith and have struggled since a certain
time in their lives. The loss of faith can also

Why George Orwell Chose to Shoot the Elephant
Why did he shoot the elephant?
There are many different reasons as to why George Orwell chose to shoot the Elephant in the short story, "Shooting an Elephant". In the following
essay, there will be a wide and deep response of why George Orwell chose to shoot the elephant in the end.
The first and primary reason for George Orwell shooting the elephant is simply Orwell being afraid. He was originally not intending to shoot the
elephant; he merely brought the rifle for his own protection. "I had no intention of shooting the elephant – I had merely sent for the rifle to defend
myself if necessary – and it is always unnerving to have a crowd following you. I marched down the hill, looking and feeling a fool, with the rifle over
my shoulder...show more content...
Orwell claims that a white man must not be frightened in front of "natives", so he wasn't, but who knows, he might have been just as afraid for his
own life as the natives.
To sum up the reasoning behind George Orwell shooting the elephant, one must conclude, that there had been put great pressure on his shoulders. He
had two ways to go, both with major problems. Some might say he chose the right thing, while others will be opposed, but one thing is right. He did it
for the better of

The Blind Men And The Elephant
The Blind Men and the Elephant explain the story of six blind men who each have a different viewpoint on an elephant's physical appearance. At first,
each of the six blind men explain their reasoning in a self–assured way without concurring towards one another's theory. Although their perspectives are
distinct, their ideas are not entirely wrong. I believe this story tells us that within our society, our world is surrounded by cultural differences and
languages we may not either understand or agree upon. However, it doesn't mean that we shouldn't listen to their ideas. Furthermore, this story
exemplifies how we act throughout our daily lives. People are the most boastful when ignorance is present; when we don't have all of the information.
The six men lacked the sense of sight and yet they each had somewhat knowledge about an elephant. Sociological imagination is the process of gaining
information through the perspective of others and incorporating those thoughts. Moreover, this concept allowed them to imagine their own theory
about what an elephant looks like. The villager's tales granted them the opportunity to see more out than what they thought they could with their own
eyes. "Information often dominates their attention and overwhelms their capacities to assimilate it. It is not only the skills of reason that they need
although their struggles to acquire these often exhaust their limited moral energy."(Mills, 1959). In this part of Mills excerpt, he identifies with the

The Elephant Man Analysis
The Elephant Man can, at times, be a tough play to talk about. The production instills a sort of guilt in the audience, seemingly as though they are the
culprits of the Elephant Man's emotional isolation from society. This guilt is very likely due to society's tendency to see the disabilities of the disabled
person, as opposed to the person him or herself, as The Elephant Man presents this societal problem, among others, with all of the subtleties befitting a
train colliding with a merry–go–round. For example, one scene in which The Elephant Man tackles this subject in such a veritably unsubtle demeanor
would be the play's twelfth scene: "Who Does He Remind You Of?" Within the scene, a slew of characters, both major and minor, ostensibly strut out
onto the stage and proudly proclaim that Merrick, the titular character, is very much like them. From Mrs. Kendall, to Treves, to the Bishop, each
character accordingly lists features that describe them and attributes those features to Merrick. Meanwhile, the Elephant Man lies in the background, a
societal mirror that none can gaze upon without witnessing a reflection of their own self. They casually dismiss his existence, relegating him to the
position of being seen and not heard as they toot the horns of their own virtues, supposedly shared by their collective pet. However, this dismissive
mistreatment of Merrick occasionally descends to a far more crudely callous level. In scene thirteen, titled "Anxieties of the Swamp," Merrick brings
up his worries that Treves and Mrs. Kendall might abandon him were they to find themselves in trouble. This point is punctuated and further made
clear by the small photograph he picks up, which just so happens to be of his mother, who herself had abandoned him at three years of age. Yet, despite
the clear insinuations, this line of questioning goes over Mrs. Kendall's head. Instead, she delightfully informs Merrick that his mother is quite pretty,
before descending into confusion at his following questions. Astonishingly, she seems to have distracted herself from the conversation proceeding
between her and the Elephant Man, preferring instead to consider the beauty of his mother. Perplexingly, however, in the class discussions,

Analysis Of George Orwell 's ' The Elephant '
George Orwell began the essay with his perspective on British domination. He stated that it is evil and alongside of that it is oppressive. He felt
hatred and guilt toward himself and the Burmese people. The people of Burma did not feel threatened because the narrator of the story had killed the
elephant. The Burmese people have lost their dignity and integrity while trying to fight off the British imperialism. Orwell uses allegories to describe
his experience of the British imperialism and he had his own view of the matter of slaying the elephant. He successfully used ethos, pathos, and logos
by attracting the audience to read his story. He had to make a scene in the story to make the people of Burma feel the same emotion. The elephant was
the one reason why it makes this story emotional. He used logos to show that he can kill the elephant even if he does not want to so that it does not
make him look fool.
Logos is used to show logic and persuade an audience by reason. When the author talks about the irony and the reality of imperialism, he compares
himself to the figure of a sahib. The comparison to the sahib is a term that was used to name aristocratic rulers. It is an important symbol of their
cultural image. British imperialism is a hostile environment and does not justify exploitation by controlling the Burmese people. The story sets the tone
of the author's story to be un–comforting. This story shows his flaws and how he taunts others, even his own people of Burma.

The Elephant Man Analysis
The Importance of Change in The Elephant Man Joseph Campbell once said that when, "we quit thinking primarily about ourselves and our own
self–preservation, we undergo a truly heroic transformation of consciousness" (Campbell). This quote perfectly describes the positive transformation
one can undergo, if only one is willing to try. There are ultimately only two outcomes that a character can have: either he changes, and changes his
surroundings as well, or he does not and his life continues on as is, static. Due to the possibility of a continued static existence or dynamic change,
filmmakers and writers incorporate static and dynamic characters in their works. In the film, The Elephant Man, David Lynch uses static and dynamic
characters...show more content...
A drunken Mr. Bytes locks Merrick in the monkey cage, showing that he is an animal and is to be treated as one. If Mr. Bytes had been a more
educated character, he would have also been open to new ideas. As a positive result of this, he would have helped play a part in stopping the
senseless abuse towards Merrick. Similar to Mr. Bytes, the janitor at the hospital, an uneducated, static character, also abuses Merrick during his stay
at the hospital. Throughout Merricks' stay, the janitor takes advantage of the Elephant man many times. From bringing one singular girl up to his
room to leading large groups from the bar to his window, the janitors behavior and attitude about the Elephant Man do not change. The janitor is
stuck in his ways and there is, "nothing that can change [his] belief" (Petrovic). Due to his lack of education, the janitor cannot form any new
opinions on Merrick. Going forward, he will always view Merrick as the hideous creature that can get him a few laughs, as well as a few bucks.
Because he is so incredibly closed–minded towards Merrick, the viewer can deduce that the janitor has a very small view of the world and will
continue to in his future endeavors. Unlike Mr. Bytes and the janitor, Doctor Frederick Treves is an educated individual, and therefore, he is open to
new ways of thinking. He is considered to be a dynamic character because he, "does undergo an important change in the course of the story" (Baker). In
the beginning of the film, the

Sympathy In Grapes Of Wrath And The Elephant Man

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Sympathy In Grapes Of Wrath And The Elephant Man