Di salvo investigative_slides_final


Published on

Published in: Education, News & Politics
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Di salvo investigative_slides_final

  1. 1. New Trends in Investigative Journalism Philip Di Salvo, PhD Candidate “Freedom and Pluralism of Traditional and New Media” European University Institute, Firenze June 5th 2014 phildisa@gmail.com @philipdisalvo
  2. 2. Me: •  PhD Candidate at Università della Svizzera italiana (Lugano, Switzerland) •  Italian Web Editor of the European Journalism Observatory http://it.ejo.ch/ •  Freelance Journalist for the Italian Wired •  Research field: digital whistlebowing, WikiLeaks, digital and investigative journalism, data journalism
  3. 3. You?
  4. 4. Lecture Outline: First Part (40 mins) •  Theoretical introduction, digital trends and issues •  Selected Case Studies: The BIJ, The Intercept, Brown Moses Second Part (40 mins) •  Digital whistleblowing, trends and issues •  Selected Case Studies: BalkanLeaks, PubLeaks, Die Zeit – Briefkasten, GlobaLeaks Q&A Interactive Session
  5. 5. Investigative Journalism, Towards A Definition: «An investigative journalist is a man or woman whose profession is to discover the truth and to identify lapes from it in whatever media may be availale» (de Burgh, 2000) «The investigative journalist’s intent usually embraces the need to (justifiably) defame some person or organization to expose a scandal and/or speed up institutional or legislative reform» (Franklin et. Al., 2005) Main focus: •  Discover / identify •  (Justifiably) Defame / Expose
  6. 6. Investigative Journalism, Characteristics and Peculiarities - I: News or «analytical» Journalism: •  Descriptive •  Accurate, explanatory •  Reconfiguration of data available •  Conventionally accepted sources, providers of the news agenda •  Newsworthiness as principle (de Burgh, 2000)
  7. 7. Investigative Journalism, Characteristics and Peculiarities - II: Investigative Journalism: •  To find truth where truth is obscure •  Raise awareness on something we’re not hearing about •  Significance > journalist’s own definition & moral sense •  Research is «dispassionately» evidential •  Public interest / Fourth Estate •  Methods > From “monitoring” to “identifying the truth” (de Burgh, 2000)
  8. 8. Investigative Journalism is Research: And as a research, it has its own methodology: •  Completing •  Verifying •  Reconstructing •  Step-by-step research •  _______ •  Investigative journalism (Haller, 2004)
  9. 9. Offline Investigative Journalism The Pentagon Papers: •  Major whistleblowing case •  «High-power media and high-power sources» case (Reese, 1991) •  The triumph of the First Amendment and of the media as «watchdogs»
  10. 10. Offline Investigative Journalism The Watergate Scoop: •  Archetype of investigative/adversarial journalism •  «High-power media and high-power sources» case (Reese, 1991) •  The «Watergate myth»
  11. 11. The «Watergate Myth» and the Rise of «Contextual Journalism»: •  Research on the New York Times, the Washington Post and the The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel •  1955-2003 period •  Journalists have presented themselves in a more and more «agressive» way •  Investigative reporting stays «rare» •  «Contextual reporting» grows > from 8% (1955) to 40% (2003) •  Articles «just the facts» decrease from 80% (1955) to 2003 (2003) •  Cultural change happened already during the 60’s (Fink and Schudson, 2013, as quoted in Nazhmidinova, 2013)
  12. 12. The only constant: «The only constant in journalism is change» George Brock, 2013
  13. 13. A Changing Context for Investigative Journalism - I: Some issues are effecting Investigative journalism and journalism at large: •  Crisis in the journalism sector and «market drive» journalism •  Media Ownership and control / new gatekeepers, also digital •  More information circulating from PR departments and governments •  Attacks against journalists and their sources, «war on journalism»
  14. 14. A Changing Context for Investigative Journalism - II:
  15. 15. A Changing Context for Investigative Journalism - II: Here comes the Internet: •  Access to a wider range and number of sources •  Potential of digital technologies and formats •  Citizen and networked journalism •  New storytelling languages and formats •  Global forum of discussion •  Journalism is more a «process» than a «product» (Beckett, 2008)
  16. 16. A Changing Context for Investigative Journalism - III: (Bowman and Willis, 2005) A new «networked» environment for journalism
  17. 17. Doing Investigative Journalism on the Internet : Three raising concepts in Investigative Journalism: •  Data: •  Crowd •  Leak
  18. 18. Doing Investigative Journalism on the Internet : Three raising concepts in Investigative Journalism: •  Data: Data Journalism, Data Visualization, Computer-Assisted Reporting Case Study: The Bureau of Investigative Journalism •  Crowd •  Leak
  19. 19. Doing Investigative Journalism on the Internet : Three raising concepts in Investigative Journalism: •  Data: Data Journalism, Data Visualization, Computer-Assisted Reporting Case Study: The Bureau of Investigative Journalism •  Crowd Crowdsourcing, Crowdfunding, Social Media Case Study: ProPublica, Brown Moses •  Leak
  20. 20. Doing Investigative Journalism on the Internet : Three raising concepts in Investigative Journalism: •  Data: Data Journalism, Data Visualization, Computer-Assisted Reporting Case Study: The Bureau of Investigative Journalism •  Crowd Crowdsourcing, Crowdfunding, Social Media Case Study: ProPublica, Brown Moses •  Leak Digital whistleblowing, cryptology, source protection Case Studies: The Intercept
  21. 21. Data: The Bureau of Investigative Journalism: •  Uk, 2010, City University London •  http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/ •  Start-Up fund by The david & Elaine Potter Foundation •  Partnerships with major media •  Creative Commons publications •  Big areas of investigation •  Major investigations: - Lobbying’s Hidden Influence - Covert Drone War - Deaths in Police Custody - UK’s housing crisis (2013)
  22. 22. Data: The Bureau of Investigative Journalism – Drone Strikes in Pakistan: •  Dataset of ten years of drone strikes in Pakistan > Evidence of 383 strikes •  Sources: leaked documents (incl. WikiLeaks), media sources, existing research, evidence from legal trials •  Partnership with Forensic Architecture and Situ Research •  Online interactive map: http://wherethedronesstrike.com
  23. 23. Crowd: ProPublica: •  USA, 2008 •  Independent and non-profit newsroom •  Initial funding by the Sandler Foundation (10 million dollar) •  Business model: donation and crowdfunding, Data Store •  Two Pulitzer Prizes, 2010 (Investigative Reporting) and 2011 (National Reporting) Major Investigations: - Guns Control in the USA - NSA/Snowden Files - The Deadly Choices at Memorial
  24. 24. Crowd: ProPublica – Engagement Editor: •  Engagement Editor: Amanda Zamora •  «To find new strategies of contact with our public to expand our journalism» •  To engage readers into ProPublica stories •  Crowdsourcing: surveys to get data or direct engagement of readers for fact- checking etc. •  Use of comments: stimulating conversations with questions What’s Your Worker Safety Story? http://voicesofworkersafety.tumblr.com/
  25. 25. Crowd: Brown Moses blog: •  Eliot Higgins, 2012 •  http://brown-moses.blogspot.ch/ •  Non-professional journalism, no training •  Accurate fact-checking of weapons used in Syria and elsewhere •  Use of the crowd to attrack information about videos and pictures •  Source for: AP, NYTimes, CNN, BBC •  Crowdfunding on IndieGogo (2013) •  Networked and open journalism
  26. 26. Leak: The Intercept: •  First publication of First Look Meda, February 2014 •  https://firstlook.org/theintercept/ •  Pierre Omidyar (eBay) > funding •  Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras and Jeremy Scahill as editors •  Focus on investigations over Snowden’s files •  Adversarial journalism > impose transparency and accountability •  Publication of documents on which articles are based on
  27. 27. Leak: The Intercept - SOMALGET: •  Publication of a NSA program •  « Virtually every cell phone conversation on the island nation of Bahamas » •  Files provided by Snowden •  5 countries involved •  Nation « X » > clash with WikiLeaks •  Redactions
  28. 28. Break
  29. 29. The Raise of Digital Whistleblowing:
  30. 30. Whistleblowing, Characteristics:! •  An individual act with the intention of making information public
 •  The information is conveyed to parties outside the organization who make it public and a part of the public record
 •  The information has to do with possible or actual nontrivial wrongdoing in an organization
 •  The person exposing the agency is not a journalist or ordinary citizen, but a member or former member of the organization
 (Johnson, 2003)# “As of today, I wouldn’t have waited that long. I would have gotten a scanner and put them on the Internet” ! (Daniel Ellsberg, as quoted in Cohen, 2010)#
  31. 31. Whistleblowing! Pre-Conditions:! •  Value: News Content! •  Compatibility: Format! •  Comprehension: Simplification of information vs. unreadable dataset! (Fung, Graham, Weil, 2007)# The need of a «bridge »:! “WikiLeaks can be defined as "bridge ONG". WikiLeaks orders and makes more accessible documents submitted by individuals. […] The organization aims to facilitate circulation of information by guarantying protection to those who offer it and control over truthfulness of documents: the result is a meeting place where two different interests WikiLeaks can't necessarily comprehend. For this reason, more than a journalistic organization or "the future of journalism", it is correct to consider WL as a bridge over the Web”# (Valeriani, 2011)#
  32. 32. WikiLeaks Phases and Wb Models:! •  WiKiLeaks as a journalistic source:
 (Camp Delta Standard Operating Procedures)
 •  WikiLeaks as a content producer:
 («Collateral Murder» video)# •  WikiLeaks as a Bridge/Partner :
 (The Afghan War Logs, Iraq War Logs, Cablegate, The GI Files, The Syria Files)#
  33. 33. Whistleblowing Mediators in the Digital Age - I:! •  Journalistic Source: Document are posted on whistleblowing platforms/websites in their original shape. They are disclosed to public attention on the Internet and media can pick them up BalkanLeaks •  Content Producer: A whistleblowing/investigating group (no proper media organization) receives documents and starts working on them for publication. Journalistic stories or other content is published Offshore Leaks We Fight Censorship
  34. 34. Whistleblowing Mediators in the Digital Age - II:! •  Partnership:
 Documents are uploaded to a “bridge” organization which collaborate with journalistic media to work on content
 •  The Associated Whistleblowing Press 
 Iceland, International, Spain (2004)# •  OpenLeaks# •  Source to Media/The Ellsberg Model:
 Source gets in touch with the media or journalists without any “bridge”
 NSA/Snowden Scandal #
  35. 35. Existing Whistleblowing Ecosystem:! LeakDirectory.org:# • Around 50 operational platforms 0 5 10 15 20 25 WL Like New Concept Established Mainstream Environment
  36. 36. Case Study: 
 BalkanLeaks.eu! •  Reception and publication of Balkans-related documents# •  SecureDrop # •  Bivol.bg, Atanas Tchobanov and Assen Yordanov# •  Focus on editing and verification # •  Successful case: Major Scoops:
 List of people involved in the secret police in the
 Communist Era
 Funding and Accountability:# •  «Public money and foundations»# •  Private donation# •  Financial Transparency#
  37. 37. Case Study: 
 PubLeaks! • First Dutch Wb Platform • “Multi-stakeholder Wb model” • 42 partners involved • PubLeaks foundation > Accountability • Training for journalists • Regulation • GlobaLeaks open source technology • Stress on source’s decision
  38. 38. Case Study: 
 Briefkasten – Die Zeit! • Launched in 2012 • Open source platfrom: http://github.com/ZeitOnline/briefkasten • Interesting case of “in house” wb platform • Strong accountability • Team of professional journalists
  39. 39. Globaleaks.org:! IrpiLeaks MafiaLeaks Nawaat WildLeaks
  40. 40. Q&A! Thanks for listening! Philip Di Salvo phildisa@gmail.com Twitter: @philipdisalvo http://it.ejo.ch/ Twitter: @ejo_it
  41. 41. Interactive session:! Group 1: Propose and outline a possible whistleblowing platfrom using GlobaLeaks technology Group 2: The Country “X” Case and the Greenwald vs. WikiLeaks case Group 3: Funding investigative journalism – Crowd or big donors? Group 4: The power of the crowd > how to engage readers into investigation? Discussion
  42. 42. References: • Beckett, C. (2008). SuperMedia. Save Journalism so It Can Save the World. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.# • Beckett, C. (2012). WikiLeaks. News in the Networked Era. Cambridge (MA): Polity.# • Bowman, S. and C. Willis (2005). The Future Is Here, But Do News Media Companies See It? Nieman Reports, Winter 2005. http:// www.nieman.harvard.edu/reports/article/100558/The-Future-Is-Here-But-Do-News-Media-Companies-See-It.aspx.# • Brock, G. (2013). Out of Print. Newspapers, Journalism and the Business of News in the Digital Age. London: Kogan Page# • de Burgh, H. et. al. (2000). Investigative Journalism: Context and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.# • Di Salvo, P. (2014). ProPublica venderà dati. The European Journalism Observatory, March 5th. http://it.ejo.ch/11814/media_digitali/ propublica-dati-data-journalism.# • Di Salvo, P. (2014). Come ProPublica lavora con i suoi lettori. Wired.it, May 2nd. http://www.wired.it/attualita/media/2014/05/02/ intervista-propublica-zamora-ijf14/.# • Di Salvo, P. (2014). New data shows drones killed hundreds of Pakistani civilians. The Conversation, May 30th. https:// theconversation.com/new-data-shows-drones-killed-hundreds-of-pakistani-civilians-27345.# • Fink, K. and M. Schudson. (2013). The rise of contextual journalism, 1950s – 2000s. In Journalism, 15(1), 3-20.# • Fung, A.; Graham, M.; Weil, D. (2007). Full Disclosure. The Perils and Promise of Transparency. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.# • Haller, M. (2004). Recherchieren (Praktischer Journalismus). Konstanz: UVK.# • Hill, S. and P. Lashmar (2014). Online Journalism. The Essential Guide. London: Sage.# • Franklin, B. et. al. (2005). Key Concepts in Journalism Studies. London: Sage.# • Ingram, M. (2013). The rise of Brown Moses: How an unemployed British man has become a poster boy for citizen journalism. GigaOm, November 19th. https://gigaom.com/2013/11/19/the-rise-of-brown-moses-how-an-unemployed-british-man-became-a- poster-boy-for-citizen-journalism/.# • Johnson, R.A. (2007). Whistleblowing. When It Works and Why. London: Lynne Rienne Publishing.# • Nazakat, S. (2011). Social Media and Investigative Journalism. ICIJ, August 15th. http://www.icij.org/resources/social-media-and- investigative-journalism.# • Nazhmidinova, R. (2013). Demystifying Watergate. The European Journalism Observatory, December 17th. http://en.ejo.ch/8397/ ethics_quality/demystifying-watergate.# • Pratellesi, M. (2013). New Journalism. Dalla crisi della stampa al giornalismo di tutti. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.# • Reese, S. D. (1991). Setting the Media’s Agenda: A Power Balance Persepective. In Communication Yearbook 14, ed. J.A. Anderson. Newbury Park: Sage, 309-340.# • Ross, K. A. and J. Serle. (2014). Most US drone strikes in Pakistan attack houses. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, May 23th. http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2014/05/23/most-us-drone-strikes-in-pakistan-attack-houses/.#