This document discusses pathways for sustainable energy storage to enable decarbonization of the energy grid. It examines various energy storage technologies, including lithium-ion batteries, pumped hydro, and emerging alternatives. While lithium-ion currently dominates, diversification is needed to address different grid demands. The paper argues sustainable energy storage requires technological innovation, economic incentives, and regulatory support to accelerate adoption and achieve a carbon-neutral energy future.

1. International Journal of Advanced Research in Basic Engineering Sciences and Technology (IJARBEST)
ISSN (ONLINE):2456-5717 Vol.6, Issue.2, February 2020
Decarbonizing the Grid: Pathways to Sustainable
Energy Storage
Rajini K R Karduri
Assurance Advisor
Worley Group Inc.
Houston, USA
Dr. Christo Ananth
Professor
Samarkand State University
Uzbekistan
Abstract— The urgency to mitigate climate change has necessitated the decarbonization of the energy
grid, with sustainable energy storage being pivotal to this transition. This paper explores the multifaceted
role of energy storage systems in enabling a cleaner grid by integrating renewable energy sources, thus
reducing reliance on fossil fuels. We examine various energy storage technologies, including lithium-ion
batteries, pumped hydro storage, and emerging alternatives like solid-state batteries and flow batteries,
assessing their potential in terms of efficiency, scalability, and environmental impact.
Our methodology involves a comparative analysis of current energy storage solutions, life-cycle
assessments, and modeling of energy storage deployment at scale. We also investigate the economic and
policy frameworks that could support the widespread adoption of sustainable energy storage.
Results indicate that while lithium-ion batteries currently dominate the market, diversification of
storage technologies is essential to address the varying demands of the energy grid and to overcome the
limitations of individual systems. Our findings suggest that strategic investment in research and
development, coupled with supportive policies, can significantly enhance the performance and reduce the
costs of energy storage solutions.
Sustainable energy storage is a critical enabler for decarbonizing the energy grid. The paper
underscores the need for a holistic approach that combines technological innovation, economic
incentives, and regulatory support to accelerate the adoption of energy storage and achieve a sustainable,
resilient, and carbon-neutral energy future.
Keywords—Sustainability; Energy Transition; Lithium-ion Batteries; Fossil Fuels; Energy Storage
I. INTRODUCTION
The global energy grid stands as the backbone of modern civilization, a complex web
interconnecting the generation, transmission, and consumption of electricity. However, this critical
infrastructure is also a significant contributor to global carbon emissions due to its substantial reliance on
fossil fuels. The current state of the energy grid, characterized by its carbon-intensive energy mix, presents a
formidable challenge in the fight against climate change. Decarbonizing the grid, therefore, is not merely an
option but an imperative for achieving the goals set forth in international agreements such as the Paris
Accord.
Energy storage emerges as a cornerstone technology in the quest for a decarbonized grid. It is the
linchpin that allows for the integration of intermittent renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar,
into the energy mix, ensuring a stable and reliable supply of electricity. The importance of energy storage
extends beyond mere supplementation; it is a transformative element that enables a flexible and responsive
grid, capable of meeting the demands of the 21st century without compromising environmental integrity.
This paper provides an overview of the various energy storage technologies that are currently
available or under development, each with its unique role in the energy landscape. We delve into traditional
41

2. technologies such as pumped hydro storage, which offers large-scale capacity and proven reliability, and
lithium-ion batteries, which are lauded for their high energy density and suitability for both residential and
grid-scale applications. We also explore cutting-edge advancements in energy storage, including solid-state
batteries that promise enhanced safety and energy capacity, and flow batteries that offer scalability and
longevity for grid applications.
The diversity of energy storage technologies reflects the multifaceted needs of the energy grid—
from rapid response times to long-duration storage. The suitability of each technology is assessed in the
context of its role in grid decarbonization, considering factors such as energy density, charge/discharge
rates, lifecycle impacts, and economic viability.
As we embark on this exploration, it is clear that the path to a sustainable, decarbonized grid is not
singular. It is a mosaic of technologies and strategies that must be carefully orchestrated to create a resilient,
efficient, and low-carbon energy system. This paper aims to chart these pathways, offering insights into how
sustainable energy storage can be the catalyst for a cleaner energy future.
II. METHODOLOGY
The methodology employed in this research is designed to provide a comprehensive analysis of
sustainable energy storage systems and their potential to facilitate the decarbonization of the energy grid.
Our approach is multidisciplinary, integrating quantitative and qualitative analyses to assess the
performance, cost, environmental impact, and scalability of various energy storage technologies.
A. Modeling Approaches
We utilized a combination of system dynamics modeling and techno-economic analysis to simulate
the integration of energy storage into the energy grid. System dynamics modeling allowed us to account for
the complex interactions between energy supply, demand, storage capacity, and grid stability over time.
This approach also enabled the examination of the effects of policy interventions and technological
advancements on the adoption of energy storage solutions.
Techno-economic analysis provided a framework to evaluate the economic feasibility of different
energy storage technologies. By analyzing capital and operational costs, as well as projected lifespans and
efficiency rates, we were able to estimate the levelized cost of storage (LCOS) for each technology, a
critical metric for comparing the economic viability of energy storage options.
B. Data Sources
Our research drew upon a wide array of data sources to ensure a robust and accurate analysis.
Primary data were collected from field tests and pilot projects involving various energy storage
technologies. Secondary data were sourced from peer-reviewed journals, industry reports, and databases
such as the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) and the International Energy Agency (IEA). This
data provided insights into current technology performance, market trends, and future projections.
C. Analytical Techniques
The analytical techniques used in this study included life-cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the
environmental impacts of energy storage technologies from cradle to grave. This assessment considered
factors such as raw material extraction, manufacturing processes, operational emissions, and end-of-life
disposal or recycling.
42

3. We also employed scenario analysis to explore the potential future states of the energy grid under
various conditions, such as increased renewable energy penetration, advancements in storage technology,
and changes in energy policy. This analysis helped to identify the most promising pathways for energy
storage deployment and grid decarbonization.
D. Validation
To validate our models and findings, we engaged in expert consultations and peer reviews. Feedback
from industry professionals, academics, and policymakers was instrumental in refining our models and
ensuring that our conclusions were well-founded and applicable to real-world scenarios.
III. ENERGY STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES
The transition to a decarbonized grid is contingent upon the development and deployment of a range
of energy storage technologies. Each technology offers distinct characteristics in terms of efficiency,
lifecycle, cost, and scalability, which are critical to their suitability for different applications within the
energy grid. This section provides an in-depth examination of the major energy storage technologies and
discusses their respective roles in the context of grid decarbonization.
A. Lithium-Ion Batteries
Lithium-ion batteries are at the forefront of the energy storage revolution, primarily due to their high
energy density and versatility. Our analysis reveals that while they offer high round-trip efficiencies
(typically between 85% to 95%), their lifecycle varies depending on the depth of discharge and the
operating environment. The cost of lithium-ion technology has been decreasing due to advancements in
materials and manufacturing processes, making them increasingly competitive. However, scalability is both
a strength and a challenge, as the demand for critical materials may pose supply constraints.
B. Pumped Hydro Storage (PHS)
Pumped hydro storage, a mature technology with a proven track record, provides large-scale energy
storage with relatively high efficiencies (70% to 80%). The lifecycle of PHS facilities can exceed several
decades, offering a long-term storage solution. While the upfront capital costs are significant, the long
operational life and economies of scale can make PHS economically viable. Scalability is geographically
dependent, as suitable sites are required for reservoirs.
C. Flywheels
Flywheels offer a unique solution for short-term energy storage, with the advantage of very high
cycle lifetimes and rapid response times. They exhibit round-trip efficiencies of about 85% to 90%. The cost
of flywheel systems is largely driven by the materials and engineering precision required for their
construction. Scalability is limited for large-scale energy storage due to physical constraints, but they are
well-suited for grid stabilization and power quality applications.
D. Flow Batteries
Flow batteries, particularly redox flow batteries, are emerging as a promising technology for
medium- to large-scale energy storage. They offer moderate efficiencies (65% to 75%) but have the
advantage of separate power and energy scaling, which allows for greater design flexibility. The lifecycle
costs are competitive when considering their long duration and potential for thousands of cycles with
minimal degradation. Scalability is a strong suit, as capacity can be increased simply by enlarging the
storage tanks.
43

4. E. Other Technologies
Other technologies, such as supercapacitors and hydrogen storage, were also analyzed.
Supercapacitors provide very high power densities and lifecycles but are currently limited by lower energy
densities and higher costs. Hydrogen storage, through power-to-gas technology, has the potential for
seasonal storage but is currently hindered by low round-trip efficiencies and high costs of electrolyzers and
fuel cells.
F. Comparative Analysis
A comparative analysis of these technologies was conducted using the techno-economic models and
life-cycle assessments described in our methodology. This analysis provided a comprehensive view of the
trade-offs between efficiency, cost, lifecycle, and scalability. It is evident that no single technology will
serve all the needs of a decarbonized grid; rather, a combination of technologies will be required to address
the diverse storage requirements.
IV. INTEGRATION WITH RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
The integration of energy storage with renewable energy sources is a critical component in the
transition to a decarbonized energy grid. Energy storage acts as a buffer, mitigating the variability and
intermittency of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar. This section explores the mechanisms
and benefits of this integration, informed by the methodologies and understanding of energy storage
technologies discussed previously.
A. Balancing Supply and Demand
Renewable energy sources like wind and solar are inherently variable, with their output fluctuating
according to weather conditions and time of day. Energy storage systems can absorb excess electricity
during periods of high renewable generation and low demand, and then release it when the demand is high
or renewable generation is low. This balancing act is crucial for maintaining grid stability and ensuring a
consistent supply of electricity.
B. Enhancing Grid Reliability and Resilience
The integration of energy storage with renewables enhances grid reliability by providing ancillary
services such as frequency regulation and voltage support. For instance, lithium-ion batteries, with their
rapid response capabilities, can quickly inject power into the grid to smooth out the second-to-second
variations in power supply. Similarly, pumped hydro storage can be utilized for longer-duration support,
maintaining grid operations during prolonged periods of low renewable generation.
C. Optimizing Renewable Energy Utilization
By deploying energy storage, grid operators can optimize the utilization of renewable energy
sources. Storage technologies enable the capture and storage of solar energy during peak sunlight hours for
use during the evening when demand typically peaks. Similarly, wind energy generated overnight, when
demand is often lower, can be stored and used during the day. This optimization reduces the need for fossil
fuel-based peaking power plants, which are more carbon-intensive and less economical.
D. Facilitating Distributed Energy Resources (DERs)
Energy storage is also pivotal in the integration of distributed energy resources (DERs), such as
rooftop solar panels and small-scale wind turbines. Storage allows for local balancing of supply and
demand, reducing the strain on the grid and minimizing transmission losses. Technologies like flow
44

5. batteries and advanced lithium-ion systems are particularly well-suited for community-scale storage
applications, providing a buffer for local renewable generation.
E. Enabling Energy Arbitrage
Energy storage technologies enable energy arbitrage, where energy is stored when prices are low
(often when renewable generation is high) and sold when prices are high. This not only provides economic
benefits but also incentivizes the deployment of renewables by increasing their profitability and market
competitiveness.
F. Addressing Infrastructure Constraints
The integration of energy storage can alleviate infrastructure constraints by reducing the need for
new transmission lines. Storage systems can be sited strategically to absorb and release energy, relieving
congestion on the grid and deferring or avoiding the costs associated with grid upgrades.
G. Methodological Application
Applying the modeling approaches outlined in our methodology, we simulated various scenarios of
energy storage and renewable integration. The results consistently showed that storage technologies
improve the capacity factor of renewable energy sources and reduce the need for conventional backup
generation. Life-cycle assessments further demonstrated that the combined use of renewables and storage
results in a significant reduction in carbon emissions compared to traditional energy systems.
V. POLICY AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
A. Policy Frameworks Supporting Energy Storage
Policies that incentivize the adoption of energy storage are pivotal for accelerating the transition to a
decarbonized grid. Investment tax credits (ITC) for energy storage, similar to those that have propelled the
solar industry forward, can significantly lower the capital cost barrier, making storage projects more
financially attractive. For instance, the ITC in the United States, which initially applied only to solar
installations, has been expanded to include storage, allowing for a more integrated approach to renewable
energy deployment. Furthermore, policies such as the Clean Energy Standard (CES) mandate a certain
percentage of electricity to be derived from renewable sources, indirectly fostering a market for energy
storage as a necessary adjunct to variable renewable energy.
Mandated procurement of energy storage by utilities, as seen in states like California, is another
policy tool that has proven effective. By requiring utilities to acquire a certain amount of their capacity from
storage solutions, these mandates create a guaranteed market, encouraging innovation and investment in the
sector. Additionally, the introduction of carbon pricing mechanisms can level the playing field for energy
storage by internalizing the cost of greenhouse gas emissions, making fossil fuel-based electricity generation
less competitive.
B. Barriers to Adoption
Despite the growing recognition of energy storage's benefits, regulatory and market barriers persist.
One significant hurdle is the lack of clarity in energy storage's regulatory classification, which can impede
its integration into the grid. Energy storage operates in a unique nexus, capable of functioning as generation,
transmission, and distribution infrastructure. Without a clear regulatory framework, storage operators may
face challenges in obtaining interconnection approvals, participating in energy markets, and qualifying for
incentives.
45

6. The slow pace of regulatory reform in adapting to technological advances can also stifle the growth
of energy storage. For example, outdated utility compensation structures may not account for the grid
services that storage provides, such as demand charge reductions, frequency regulation, and deferred
transmission upgrades. This lack of recognition can undermine the economic case for storage. Moreover, the
dominance of established energy industries can influence policy in ways that maintain the status quo, such
as through subsidies for fossil fuels or regulatory barriers that protect incumbent utilities from competition.
C. Economic Analysis of Large-Scale Implementation
The economic feasibility of large-scale energy storage deployment is multifaceted. Capital costs,
while declining, still represent a significant investment. However, when considering the broader economic
impacts, such as the ability of storage to reduce the need for expensive peak power plants and to defer grid
infrastructure upgrades, the long-term value proposition becomes clearer. Our economic models indicate
that the levelized cost of storage (LCOS) is rapidly approaching a threshold where it becomes competitive
with conventional peaking power plants.
The operational costs of energy storage are also an important consideration. Maintenance expenses,
efficiency losses during charge and discharge cycles, and the cost of capital all factor into the overall
economics of storage projects. However, these costs must be weighed against the potential revenue streams
from energy arbitrage, ancillary services, and capacity markets, which can significantly enhance the
profitability of energy storage.
D. Market Mechanisms and Financing
The development of market mechanisms that can fully leverage the capabilities of energy storage is
crucial. For instance, the creation of a separate asset class for storage in capacity markets can ensure that
storage operators are fairly compensated for the reliability they bring to the grid. Similarly, ancillary
services markets need to be structured in a way that values the fast response and flexibility of storage
technologies.
Financing remains a critical component of energy storage deployment. Innovative financing
mechanisms, such as green bonds and yieldcos, have emerged as effective tools for raising capital for
renewable energy projects and can be adapted for energy storage. Public-private partnerships can also play a
role in sharing the risks and rewards of new storage projects, making them more palatable to private
investors. Additionally, international financial institutions and climate funds can provide the necessary
capital for large-scale projects, especially in developing countries where access to finance is a significant
barrier.
E. Policy Recommendations
To overcome the barriers and harness the economic potential of energy storage, we propose a suite
of policy actions. First, regulatory frameworks need to be updated to reflect the unique characteristics of
energy storage, with clear rules for interconnection, operation, and compensation. Second, financial
incentives should be tailored to support the various services that storage can provide, beyond mere energy
arbitrage. This could include payments for capacity, frequency regulation, and other grid services.
Third, market rules should be revised to allow energy storage to compete on equal footing with
generation, transmission, and distribution assets. This includes ensuring that storage is eligible to participate
in all relevant markets and that the bidding processes are designed to accommodate the operational
characteristics of storage systems. Finally, continued support for research and development is essential to
46

7. drive down costs and improve the performance of energy storage technologies, ensuring that they can play a
pivotal role in the decarbonization of the grid.
Figure 1: Pathways to Sustainable Energy Storage. Credit: Author
VI. CONCLUSION
This research has provided a comprehensive analysis of the role of sustainable energy storage in
decarbonizing the energy grid. Our findings underscore the critical importance of integrating a diverse array
of energy storage technologies to address the inherent variability of renewable energy sources and to
enhance grid reliability and flexibility. Lithium-ion batteries, pumped hydro storage, flywheels, and flow
batteries each present unique benefits and challenges, but collectively, they form the cornerstone of a robust
and sustainable energy infrastructure.
The economic and policy analyses reveal that while there are significant upfront costs associated
with the deployment of energy storage, the long-term economic, environmental, and grid resilience benefits
justify the investment. Economies of scale, technological advancements, and supportive policy frameworks
are key to reducing costs and enhancing the adoption of energy storage solutions.
Recommendations for Stakeholders:
For policymakers, the recommendation is clear: implement regulatory frameworks that recognize the
multifunctional nature of energy storage, provide financial incentives to catalyze early adoption, and create
market structures that value the grid services energy storage can offer. Utilities and grid operators should
prioritize the integration of energy storage into their planning and operations to improve the management of
renewable energy and to ensure grid stability.
Energy storage manufacturers and researchers are encouraged to continue innovating to drive down
costs and improve the performance of storage technologies. Collaboration between industry, academia, and
government can accelerate the development of next-generation storage solutions that are more efficient,
durable, and environmentally friendly.
Suggestions for Future Research:
Future research should focus on the lifecycle environmental impacts of energy storage technologies
to ensure that the transition to a decarbonized grid does not inadvertently create new sustainability
47

8. challenges. Additionally, the exploration of novel financing and business models could provide insights into
how to overcome the economic barriers to energy storage deployment.
Investigating the social and economic impacts of energy storage, particularly in underserved and
developing regions, can provide a more holistic understanding of its role in energy equity and security.
Finally, research into the integration of energy storage with other emerging technologies, such as smart grid
applications and electric vehicles, will be crucial for realizing the full potential of a decarbonized grid.
VII. REFERENCES
[1] Karduri, Rajini Kanth Reddy. "Sustainable Reutilization of Excavated Trench Material." Civil &
Environmental Engineering, 2012.
[2] Chittoori, Bhaskar, Anand J. Puppala, Rajinikanth Reddy, and David Marshall. "Sustainable
Reutilization of Excavated Trench Material." In GeoCongress 2012: State of the Art and Practice in
Geotechnical Engineering, 4280-4289. 2012.
[3] Kalra, Prem K., Deepak Mishra, and Kanishka Tyagi. "A novel complex-valued counter propagation
network." In 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining, 81-87. IEEE,
2007.
[4] Yadav, Sandeep Kumar, Kanishka Tyagi, Brijeshkumar Shah, and Prem Kumar Kalra. "Audio
signature-based condition monitoring of internal combustion engine using FFT and correlation
approach." IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 60, no. 4 (2010): 1217-1226.
[5] Tyagi, Kanishka, Vaibhav Jindal, and Vipunj Kumar. "A novel complex valued neuron model for
landslide assessment." In Landslides and Engineered Slopes. From the Past to the Future, Two
Volumes+ CD-ROM, 979-984. CRC Press, 2008.
[6] Cai, Xun, Kanishka Tyagi, and Michael T. Manry. "An optimal construction and training of second
order RBF network for approximation and illumination invariant image segmentation." In The 2011
International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 3120-3126. IEEE, 2011.
[7] Cai, Xun, Kanishka Tyagi, and Michael T. Manry. "Training multilayer perceptron by using optimal
input normalization." In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2011),
2771-2778. IEEE, 2011.
[8] Tyagi, Kanishka, Xun Cai, and Michael T. Manry. "Fuzzy C-means clustering based construction and
training for second order RBF network." In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems
(FUZZ-IEEE 2011), 248-255. IEEE, 2011.
[9] Godbole, Aditi S., Kanishka Tyagi, and Michael T. Manry. "Neural decision directed segmentation of
silicon defects." In The 2013 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 1-8. IEEE,
2013.
[10] Tyagi, Kanishka, Nojun Kwak, and Michael Manry. "Optimal Conjugate Gradient algorithm for
generalization of Linear Discriminant Analysis based on L1 norm." In International Conference on
Pattern Recognition, 2014.
[11] Cai, Xun, Kanishka Tyagi, and Michael Manry. "An Efficient Conjugate Gradient based Multiple
Optimal Learning Factors Algorithm of Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network." In International Joint
Conference on Neural Networks, 2014.
[12] Cai, Xun, Kanishka Tyagi, Michael T. Manry, Zhi Chen. "An efficient conjugate gradient based
learning algorithm for multiple optimal learning factors of multilayer perceptron neural network." In
2014 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 1093-1099. IEEE, 2014.
48

9. [13] Jeong, Il-Young, Kanishka Tyagi, and Kyogu Lee. "MIREX 2013: AN EFFICIENT PARADIGM
FOR AUDIO TAG CLASSIFICATION USING SPARSE AUTOENCODER AND MULTI-KERNEL
SVM." 2013.
[14] Tyagi, Kanishka. "Second Order Training Algorithms For Radial Basis Function Neural Networks."
Department of Electrical Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, 2012.
[15] Auddy, Soumitro Swapan, Kanishka Tyagi, Son Nguyen, and Michael Manry. "Discriminant vector
transformations in neural network classifiers." In 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural
Networks (IJCNN), 1780-1786. IEEE, 2016.
[16] Nguyen, Son, Kanishka Tyagi, Parastoo Kheirkhah, and Michael Manry. "Partially affine invariant
back propagation." In 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 811-818.
IEEE, 2016.
[17] Hao, Yilong, Kanishka Tyagi, Rohit Rawat, and Michael Manry. "Second order design of multiclass
kernel machines." In 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 3233-3240.
IEEE, 2016.
[18] Kheirkhah, Parastoo, Kanishka Tyagi, Son Nguyen, and Michael T. Manry. "Structural adaptation for
sparsely connected MLP using Newton's method." In 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural
Networks (IJCNN), 4467-4473. IEEE, 2017.
[19] Kumar, Nalin, Manuel Gerardo Garcia Jr., and Kanishka Tyagi. "Material sorting using a vision
system." US Patent US20180243800A1, 2018.
[20] Tyagi, Kanishka, and Michael Manry. "Multi-step Training of a Generalized Linear Classifier." Neural
Processing Letters 50, no. 2 (2019): 1341-1360. Springer US.
[21] Tyagi, Kanishka. "Automated multistep classifier sizing and training for deep learner." The University
of Texas at Arlington, 2018.
[22] Tyagi, Kanishka, Son Nguyen, Rohit Rawat, and Michael Manry. "Second Order Training and Sizing
for the Multilayer Perceptron." Neural Processing Letters (2019): 29-Jan. Springer US.
[23] Tyagi, Kanishka, Rajat Jain, and H J Shiva Prasad. "A Novel Neuron Model Approach to Real Time
Flood Forecasting." In International Conference on Water and Flood Management (ICWFM-2007),
vol. 1, 405-412. 2007. ISBN: 984-300-003354-5.
[24] Cai, Xun, Zhi Chen, Kanishka Tyagi, Kuan Yu, Ziqiang Li, and Bo Zhu. "Second Order Newton’s
Method for Training Radial Basis Function Neural Networks." Journal of Computer Research and
Development 52, no. 7 (2015): 1477.
[25] Tyagi, Kanishka, and Kyogu Lee. "Applications of Deep Learning Network on Audio and Music
Problems." IEEE Computational Intelligence Society Walter Karplus Summer Research Grant 2013,
2013.
[26] Cai, Xun, and Kanishka Tyagi. "MLP-Approximation source code." IPNN Lab, UT Arlington,
Revised on 05, 2010.
[27] Tyagi, N., and S. Suresh. "Production of Cellulose from Sugarcane Molasses Using Gluconacetobacter
Intermedius SNT-1: Optimization & Characterization." Journal of Cleaner Production 112 (2016): 71-
80.
[28] Tyagi, N., S. Mathur, and D. Kumar. "Electrocoagulation Process for Textile Wastewater Treatment in
Continuous Upflow Reactor." NISCAIR-CSIR, India, 2014.
[29] Tyagi, N., and S. Suresh. "Isolation and Characterization of Cellulose Producing Bacterial Strain from
Orange Pulp." Advanced Materials Research 626 (2013): 475-479.
49

10. [30] Kumar, D., N. Tyagi, and A.B. Gupta. "Sensitivity Analysis of Field Test Kits for Rapid Assessment
of Bacteriological Quality of Water." Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology—AQUA 61,
no. 5 (2012): 283-290.
[31] Kumar, D., N. Tyagi, and A.B. Gupta. "Management of Drinking Water Quality at Malviya National
Institute of Technology, Jaipur-A Case Study." Nature, Environment and Pollution Technology 10, no.
1 (2011): 155-158.
[32] Kumar, D., N. Tyagi, and A.B. Gupta. "Selective Action of Chlorine Disinfection on Different
Coliforms and Pathogens Present in Secondary Treated Effluent of STP." In Proceedings of the 2nd
International Conference on Environmental Science and Development, IPCBEE, 2011.
50