An insight in the US strategy for global domination. The Project for the New American Century PNAC goals of the neocons Eliot Abrams John Bolton The Project for the New American Century Essential social, medical, educational and retirement services have to be gutted so that those funds can be directed towards a military buildup the WTO and the IMF will dictate financial terms to the entire planet. Trumps new Budget.

1. An insight in the US strategy for global domination.
The Project for the New American Century
The biggest danger for Europe is the US and Nato
doctrines.
Why?
Let’s start.
Do you know these objectives?
These are the PNAC goals of the neocons.
* Permanent militarypresence in Southern Europe,
SoutheastAsia and the Middle East;
* Modernize defense, improve fighters, submarines
and fleet capacities;
* Develop and implement a global missile system,
developinga strategic dominanceof space;
* Manage the cyberspace;
* Increase defense spending to a minimum of 3.8
percent of gross domestic product ".
The PNAC document described four "Core
Missions" for the American military. The two
central requirements are for American forces to
"fight and decisivelywin multiple, simultaneous
major theater wars," and to "perform the

2. 'constabulary' duties associated with shaping the
security environment in critical regions." Note well
that PNAC does not want America to be prepared to
fight simultaneous major wars. In order to bring this
plan to fruition, the military must fight these wars
one way or the other to establish American
dominancefor all to see.
In what way does PNAC stand above the other
groups that would set American foreign policy if
they could?
Two events brought PNAC into the mainstreamof
American government: the disputed election of
George W. Bush, and the attacks of September 11th.
When Bush assumed the Presidency, the men who
created and nurtured the imperial dreams of PNAC
became the men who run the Pentagon, the Defense
Department and the White House. When the Towers
came down, these men turn their White Papers into
substantive policy.
Who are behind PNAC?
Its members include:
* Vice President Dick Cheney, one of the PNAC
founders, who served as Secretary of Defense for
Bush Sr.;

3. * I. Lewis Libby, Cheney's top national
security assistant;
* Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, also a
founding member, along with four of his chief aides
including;
* Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz,
arguably the ideological father of the group;
* Eliot Abrams, prominent member of
Bush's NationalSecurity Council, who was pardoned
by Bush Sr. in the Iran/Contrascandal;
* John Bolton, who serves as
Undersecretaryfor Arms Controland International
Security in the Bush administration;
* Richard Perle, former Reagan administration
official and present chairman of the powerful
Defense PolicyBoard;
* Randy Scheunemann, President of the
Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, who was
Trent Lott's national securityaide and who served as
an advisorto Rumsfeld on Iraq in 2001;

4. * Bruce Jackson, Chairman of PNAC, a position
he took after serving for years as vice president of
weapons manufacturerLockheed-Martin, and who
also headed the Republican Party Platform
subcommittee for National Security and Foreign
Policyduring the 2000 campaign. His section of the
2000 GOP Platformexplicitlycalled for the removal
of Saddam Hussein;
* William Kristol, noted conservative writer
for the Weekly Standard, a magazine owned along
with the Fox News Network by conservativemedia
mogul Ruppert Murdoch.
The Project for the New American Century seeks to
establish what they call 'Pax Americana' across the
globe. Essentially, their goal is to transform
America, the sole remaining superpower, into a
planetaryempire by force of arms.The first step of
this Pax Americana is the removal of Saddam
Hussein and the establishment of an American
protectorate in Iraq. The purpose of this is
threefold:
1) To acquire control of the oil producers so as to
fund the entire enterprise;
2) To fire a warning shot across the bows of every
leader in the Middle East;

5. 3) To establish in Iraq a militarystaging area for the
eventual invasion and overthrowof several Middle
Eastern regimes.
Essentialsocial,medical, educationaland retirement
services have to be gutted so that those funds can be
directed towards a militarybuildup. Actions taken
abroadto establishthe preeminence of American
power, most specificallyin the Middle East, will
bring a torrent of terrorist attacks to the home front.
Such attacks will bring about the final suspension of
constitutional rights and the rule of habeas corpus,
as we will find ourselvesunder martial law. In the
end, however, this may be inevitable.An empire
cannot functionwith the slow, cumbersome machine
of a constitutional democracyon its back. Empires
must be ruled with speed and ruthlessness.
President Bush jr. released on September 20th 2001
the "National Security Strategy of the United States
of America." It was an ideological match to PNAC's
"RebuildingAmerica's Defenses" report issued a
year earlier. In many places, it used exactly the same
language to describe America's new place in the
world.
The bankrollersfrom the WTO and the IMF will
dictate financialterms to the entire planet. This last
aspect of the plan is pivotal.
WilliamRivers Pit
2002

6. A short comment especiallywith an Europeanlook.
If we don’t want give more fuel to this US goal of
world domination by a totalitarian state then no
civilian is save (Assange?), I think we have to get out
of this power-structure fast. I think we can do this by
a change of economics goals. Just look at the budget
of DonaldTrump….Doesit fit PNAC?
If Europe lookedbetter and more sincerelyat the
East and in particular at Russia, they would
probablyalso see the incredible opportunitiesthat
appear there. In Russia gas fields are now coming
"online" that contain enough gas to provide
themselves with energy for hundreds of years and
then they have enough left over to MASSELY export
this gas
Note Bene, peoplewould slowly see that Putin's
diplomatic policyin particular is like a gift from
heaven.
Let's hope that his successors followthe same rules.
He is not warlike, remains friendly and wants to
create prosperityfor his people, moreover Russia is
one of the most reliable suppliers in the world, even
during the USSR time they never cut off the gas to
the West.

7. Russia can also react differentlyto the lies, insults,
offenses and provocationsthat come HERE from the
West and in particular from totally corrupt and
immoral US and UK. What if Russiaannexes East
Ukraine? Whether NATO is destroying the Black
Sea fleet, includingNATO troops on its border
under the excuse that NATO has promised not to
expand? Whatthen?
Does anyone really think that the US, the UK or
France will use the nuclear option? That is one
Currently, an "old guard" puts an emerging giant in
the way of everything developing. They will fail!
And remember NATO is just a farce.