SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 115
Feasibility Study
Woodridge Athletic
Recreation Center
Woodridge (IL) Park District
This document details the vision, the business model, current
status,
expected needs, defined markets, and projected results of the
Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center project, as well as the
projected feasibility for the success and financial viability of
the
project. This study represents a formal statement of the business
goals and the reasons why they are believed attainable, in
addition to
background information about the Park District and its
assembled
advisory board.
April 2012
Prepared For: Woodridge Park District
Prepared by: The Sports Facilities Advisory
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
....................................................................3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
...............................................................................................
............................................ 5
PROJECT INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLGY
...............................................................................................
....... 7
Project Background
...............................................................................................
................ 7
Planning and Strategy
...............................................................................................
........... 8
Final Facility Design - Option 7
....................................................................................... 11
Site Options
...............................................................................................
........................... 11
Financial Forecasting
...............................................................................................
........... 14
PROGRAMMING AND PRODUCTS/SERVICES
...............................................................................................
........ 15
Projected Revenue of Products and Services
.................................................................. 16
MARKET ANALYSIS
...............................................................................................
..........19
FACILITY LOCATION & SITE ACCESSIBILITY
...............................................................................................
........ 20
MARKET DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
...............................................................................................
....... 21
EXISTING PROVIDER ANALYSIS
...............................................................................................
............................ 24
Existing Turf
Providers.................................................................................
...................... 30
Existing Court Providers
...............................................................................................
..... 32
Existing Baseball and Softball Training Providers
...................................................... 33
Existing YMCA and Rec Centers
....................................................................................... 34
Existing Fitness Providers
...............................................................................................
.. 35
Summary of Existing Service Providers
.......................................................................... 37
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
...............................................................................................
.....39
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS
...............................................................................................
.............. 40
Programming Revenues & Expenses
................................................................................ 40
Payroll
...............................................................................................
.................................... 43
Facility and Operating Expenses
...................................................................................... 46
CONCLUSION
...............................................................................................
......................48
CONCLUSION & PROFESSIONAL RECOMMENDATION
........................................................................................ 49
Contributors to Project Success
........................................................................................ 49
Challenges to Project Success
...........................................................................................
50
Conclusion, Recommendations & Next Steps
................................................................ 50
APPENDIX
...............................................................................................
.............................52
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 3
Project Planning & Development
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 4
THE SPORTS FACILITIES ADVISORY PROFILE
The Sports Facilities Advisory
The Park District engaged The Sports Facilities Advisory (SFA)
to contribute third-party
financial and feasibility analysis and expertise for this indoor
sports and recreation facility.
Operated by a team of accomplished sports facility operators,
business advisors, league sports
experts, corporate team development professionals, and facility
design professionals; SFA is a
full-service consultancy firm specializing in the planning,
opening, and managing of sports and
recreation facilities of all sizes and scope. SFA assists clients in
evaluating opportunities,
developing new sport and recreation facilities – from
community centers to professional-level
training and competition facilities – and managing or
optimizing existing operations. SFA’s
work encompasses multisport and multipurpose centers,
performance training facilities,
health/fitness centers, aquatic facilities, and outdoor complexes.
Having served a portfolio of
projects totaling more than $2 billion in planned and operational
facilities, SFA is called upon to
assist sports tourism destinations, private developers, parks and
recreation departments and
other national/state/local government entities, and architect and
engineering firms. SFA also
offers design-build and general contractor services,
architectural consultations, and bid
procurement. Through our network of vendors, SFA has also
secured serious discounts for
purchases of turf, hardwood, lighting, dasher boards, and other
sports-specific elements. SFA
facilities provide programming for various sports and activities,
such as soccer, lacrosse,
football, basketball, volleyball, baseball, softball, hockey,
performance training, health/fitness,
golf, aquatics, and many more.
Since its inception in 2003, the SFA team has consulted on more
than 60 operational sport,
recreation, and youth leadership centers across the country. SFA
has also completed more than
100 financial forecasts and feasibility analyses for projects
across the U.S. and internationally.
SFA is conservative in its market research and feasibility
projections. More than 70% of the
projects analyzed by SFA result in a “Feasibility: No” or
require significant changes to the
original business model, financing structure, or facility design.
Additional information can be found at www.sportadvisory.com.
http://www.sportadvisory.com/
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Sports Facilities Advisory (SFA) – with expertise in
developing program plans, business
plans, financial forecasts and feasibility analyses, as well as
consulting, operational
management, and design – has developed a third-party
feasibility study and financial analysis
for the development of an indoor, multi-sport community and
recreation facility in Woodridge,
Illinois surrounding area. Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center
will be situated in the community
of Woodridge in the Chicago land market. The Woodridge Park
District contracted SFA to
analyze the feasibility and financial viability for the project.
SFA developed and analyzed seven unique facility models for
Woodridge Athletic Recreation
Center. The seventh (and recommended) model is a 76,529
square foot facility that features a turf
field, a hardwood basketball court, three volleyball courts, six
batting cages, a child watch area,
a café, and multi-purpose rooms, as well as fitness areas that
include weight training, cardio
equipment, aerobics, and an elevated track. The center w ill be
equipped to host fitness, youth
and adult recreational sports, competitive sports, tournaments,
events, parties, performance
training, and more. The projected cost of construction is
$15MM, not including land and site
work.
Land and site work costs depend on which of two locations the
facility is built. SFA evaluated
both sites to determine whether they have the capacity to house
the facility. Site 1, called the
“TIF Site,” is a 4-acre parcel of land located directly south of
outdoor fields already in use for
park programs. The TIF Site may be eligible for up to $5
million in TIF subsidies. If it is chosen
and the subsidies are granted in full, SFA estimates the total
cost of the project to be $13.3MM.
Site 2, called the “Orchard Site,” is a 4.5-acre plot already
owned by the park system and
adjacent to a community aquatics center. Woodridge Park
District already owns the land,
drastically reducing initial costs, but the site is not in a TIF
district, eliminating the possibility of
the $5 million in aforementioned subsidies. If the Orchard Site
is selected, SFA estimates the
total cost of the project would be $15.8MM.
The market surrounding Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center
has over 1,500,000 people within a
30-minute drive time and features a median household income
of $75,552, which is nearly
$26,000 or 52% higher than the national average. Sports
participation rates in the area are high
relative to national averages, and – as should be expected –
there are a significant number of
existing providers in the market. Each of those factors was
weighed as the recommended
facility model above was developed. The data was also
incorporated into SFA’s proprietary
formulas as the financial forecast (pro forma) was developed,
which is detailed in the body of
this study.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 6
Based on SFA’s proven system of planning, managing, and
projecting facility utilization,
Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center is slated to generate
$1.6MM in total revenue its first year
and expand to $2.33MM in total revenue in year five. The total
cost of goods sold and operating
expenses in those respective years is $1.5MM and $1.77MM,
meaning that total net is projected
to be just under $100,000 in Woodridge Athletic Recreation
Center’s first year and over $550,000 in
its fifth year. It should be noted that those figures reflect
earnings before interest, tax,
depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). Because the site has
not been selected, it is impossible
to project year-end cash flow, but EBITDA as a percent of
revenue (6% in Year 1 and 24% in
Year 5) is within the range that signifies a viable model.
After careful consideration and comprehensive analysis of the
business model, program plan,
financials, and the Park District’s vision for the Woodridge
Athletic Recreation Center, the project
has been deemed by SFA to be a “Feasibility: Yes.” Please note
that this finding is based on
EBITDA projections. Furthermore, the finding is predicated on
minimal and an appropriate
level of debt service so that the cash flow is not hamstrung by
excessive principal and interest
payments.
SFA is conservative in its market analyses, financial forecasts,
and feasibility projections, with
more than 70% of the projects analyzed by SFA resulting in
either a “Feasibility: No” or
requiring significant changes to the original business model,
financing structure, or facility
design. Because of the comprehensive and collaborative
approach during the planning,
strategy, and feasibility analysis stages – including the
exhaustive analysis of numerous
potential models – the Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center
project stands out as an example of a
“Feasibility: Yes.”
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Total Revenue 1,599,191.61$ 1,782,660.83$ 2,062,563.87$
2,159,254.42$ 2,333,548.86$
Total Cost of Goods Sold 623,783.00$ 652,021.54$
732,267.70$ 765,982.95$ 821,738.84$
Total Operating Expenses 879,252.17$ 896,853.92$
915,880.49$ 934,790.17$ 954,396.87$
Total Expenses 1,503,035.17$ 1,548,875.45$ 1,648,148.19$
1,700,773.12$ 1,776,135.71$
EBITDA 96,156.43$ 233,785.37$ 414,415.68$
458,481.31$ 557,413.15$
% of Revenue 6% 13% 20% 21% 24%
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 7
PROJECT INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY
This document represents the analysis and findings
related to the development of Woodridge Athletic
Recreation Center. The Park District secured the
services of SFA to assist in the production of a
comprehensive financial forecast and associated
feasibility study. Through continual collaboration
and information sharing between the Park District
and consultant team, this document provides the
narrative behind the financial analysis and
underlying assumptions.
Project Background
On December 12, 2011, Mike Adams (Executive
Director) and Don Ritter (Superintendent of
Recreation/Deputy Director) of the Woodridge (IL)
Park District met by phone with The Sports
Facilities Advisory (SFA). This call was a follow -up
to a presentation that SFA had completed during the 2011
Athletic Business Conference & Expo
on Dec. 1. Mr. Adams attended this session and was interested
in learning more about SFA’s
capabilities to assist the Woodridge Park District with its
recreation center planning process.
Through that discussion, the following facts were identified:
The Woodridge Park District (WPD) had completed a
preliminary community needs
assessment and determined that there is interest in a community
recreation center.
The WPD was interested in evaluating the financial realities for
the construction and
operation of a community recreation center.
The WPD was interested in pursuing a model that can be
financially self-sustaining.
There was interest in evaluating the potential for the site to
serve as a community
destination; therefore, the site and final plan may include
additional spaces for other
local entities and/or retail space that could provide economic
impact while working
synergistically with the community recreation center.
It was critical to the decision-making process that SFA’s study
includes detailed
financial forecasts.
Vision Statement
Woodridge ARC will establish itself in
the community as the place to go for
family recreation, indoor sports, and
fun in Woodridge and the
neighboring communities. The
facility – which will function as a
high-quality indoor sports complex
but maintain the atmosphere of a
local community center – will focus
on providing a best-in-class playing
environment as well as an
unmatched experience for families,
athletes and spectators.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 8
Planning and Strategy
To begin the analytical process, the two sides worked through
several critical strategy issues in
the development of the business model and the financial
projections for Woodridge Athletic
Recreation Center; more specifically:
Preliminary demographic review and
other market characteristics
Product lines & services
The business model
Facility components & amenities
Facility design considerations
Site planning and land acquisition
Projected start-up costs
Community needs and desired impact
Vision
Major marketing strategies
Developing Ideal Customer
Relationships© (ICR)
Local providers
Staffing approaches
Facility differentiators
Funding strategy
Construction & pre-opening timeline
Potential strategic alliances
Facility utilization
This initial phase of work included discussions related to:
Transforming existing ideas into a
realistic plan
Top reasons why facilities fail to meet
forecasted revenues
Top reasons why most developers fail to
raise capital
Estimating timelines for funding,
construction/build-out, profitability,
etc.
Keys to successful facility ownership
What’s involved in raising capital for a
new facility
Identifying and strengthening resources
in preparation for financing
presentations
Maximizing revenue per square foot
Current trends in facility financing
(common loan terms, rates, equity) and
involvement in the daily operations
Typical management and organizational
structures
And much more
SFA then completed more in-depth market research to arrive at
detailed pricing, team
projections and seasonality for the various sports, market
demand, and market reach.
From there, SFA created and analyzed a total of seven different
business and operating models
to find the best fit for the market. Based on this extensive
research, SFA arrived at its
recommended model, which provided for highest and best use
and highest returns. The chart
on the next page and the narrative that follows outlines models
1-6. Each of these models
provided discussion points and insights that contributed to the
creation of model 7, designated
as the “final facility design.”
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 9
Models 1-6 Comparison
Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6
Fitness, 2 Court
Gym, Turf
Fitness, 1 Court
Gym, Turf
Fitness, 2 Court
Gym, No Turf
Fitness, 2 Court
Gym, Synthetic
Fitness, 1 Court
Gym, Synthetic
Fitness, 1 Court
Gym, No Turf
88,188 sf 75,969 sf 61,188 sf 73,406 sf 61,188 sf 48,969 sf
C
o
n
s
tr
u
ct
io
n
&
S
ta
rt
-U
p
C
o
st
Land + Site work $2,900,000 $2,900,000 $2,900,000
$2,900,000 $2,900,000 $2,900,000
Hard Cost (bldg. only) $12,988,563 $11,192,406 $9,019,563
$10,815,719 $9,019,563 $7,223,406
Field/Sport Equipment $1,013,555 $877,000 $915,577
$998,969 $862,414 $779,023
FF&E $277,830 $277,830 $277,830 $277,830 $277,830
$277,830
Soft Cost $1,802,281 $1,639,205 $1,441,929 $1,600,150
$1,437,074 $1,278,853
Total $18,982,228 $16,886,441 $14,554,898 $16,592,667
$14,496,880 $12,459,111
Total (minus land &
site work)
$16,082,228 $13,986,441 $11,654,898 $13,692,667
$11,596,880 $9,559,111
Year One
Revenue $1,808,580 $1,796,850 $1,507,410 $1,582,041
$1,570,311 $1,469,985
Expense $1,615,079 $1,577,665 $1,435,895 $1,495,447
$1,458,033 $1,422,296
EBITDA $193,500 $219,184 $71,514 $86,594 $112,278
$47,689
Year Two
Revenue $2,027,112 $2,014,283 $1,685,285 $1,768,786
$1,755,957 $1,635,762
Expense $1,714,834 $1,676,280 $1,527,674 $1,586,978
$1,548,425 $1,510,126
EBITDA $312,279 $338,002 $157,611 $181,808 $207,532
$125,636
Year Three
Revenue $2,341,198 $2,327,727 $1,956,433 $2,047,412
$2,033,941 $1,893,510
Expense $1,847,483 $1,807,919 $1,642,813 $1,705,275
$1,665,710 $1,619,764
EBITDA $493,715 $519,809 $313,620 $342,137 $368,231
$273,746
Year Four
Revenue $2,453,914 $2,439,769 $2,053,444 $2,146,751
$2,132,606 $1,985,842
Expense $1,917,096 $1,876,488 $1,704,522 $1,768,568
$1,727,959 $1,679,447
EBITDA $536,817 $563,281 $348,922 $378,183 $404,647
$306,395
Year Five
Revenue $2,645,390 $2,630,538 $2,209,225 $2,310,334
$2,295,482 $2,130,667
Expense $2,015,103 $1,973,417 $1,787,835 $1,855,284
$1,813,598 $1,758,332
EBITDA $630,287 $657,122 $421,389 $455,049 $481,884
$372,335
Cumulative
(5 Year)
Revenue $11,276,194 $11,209,167 $9,411,796 $9,855,324
$9,788,296 $9,115,765
Expense $9,109,595 $8,911,769 $8,098,740 $8,411,552
$8,213,726 $7,989,964
EBITDA $2,166,599 $2,297,398 $1,313,056 $1,443,771
$1,574,570 $1,125,801
11.4% 13.6% 9.0% 8.7% 10.9% 9.0%
The chart above shows the five-year operations summary for
each of the first six models developed. The following
descriptions
highlight the differences in the models, the thought process
behind the adaptations, the effect on usage, and the resulting
profitability. Note that for each of the models the land and site
work fee was been subtracted, thus eliminating variables caused
by
location and allowing for the most meaningful contrast of the
facilities themselves.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 10
Option 1 was the first model developed. It features two
basketball courts (each lined for cross-
court play on two smaller courts, which is how the majority of
youth programming would be
run), an unboarded turf field (which allows for maximum
flexibility to segment the field into
multiple areas, thus accommodating several activities at once
and allowing for multiple sports
to run simultaneously), and a fitness center. This model is the
largest and grandest of the
options, but SFA’s in-depth analysis predicted that the court
space would be underutilized for
the entirety of years 1-5 based on participation rates. Overbuilt
courts add cost to both
construction and ongoing utilities without significantly
increasing revenue, affecting the
profitability and yielding a 5-year EBITDA ROI of 11.4%.
Option 2 mirrors Option 1 but eliminates one basketball court
(and thus two smaller cross-
courts). This shift significantly decreases square footage,
construction costs, and operating costs,
increases the utilization percentages, and only marginally
decreases revenue from
tournaments/events. The result is a 5-year EBITDA ROI of
13.6%.
Option 3 keeps the two-court model developed in Option 1 and
the fitness center while
eliminating the turf component. The advantage of this model is
that it results in the smallest
footprint of any of the options, thus decreasing start-up and
construction costs, operating costs,
and management costs. That said, the courts would still be
underutilized, the revenue streams
would decrease significantly over Option 1 and Option 2
(because the turf component would be
highly utilized), and the overall service to the community would
suffer. The 5-year EBITDA
ROI is 9.0%, which signifies a low return on a relatively small
investment.
Option 4 adds a court-sized synthetic floor to Option 3.
Synthetic court is more suitable for field
sports than hardwood courts, but sacrifices a significant amount
of playability offered by turf.
The result is a footprint close to that of Option 2 and a mix of
activities similar to Option 1, but
the savings on building size, operating costs, and field/sport
equipment are offset by the
decreased draw of synthetic flooring as opposed to turf. The
hardwood courts would remain
underutilized and revenue on synthetic court is relatively low,
resulting in a 5-year EBITDA
ROI of 8.7%, the lowest of all of the models.
Option 5 presents the next logical iteration: a facility with a
single court, a single synthetic
court, and a fitness center. The footprint is the same as Option 3
(again requiring low start-up
and construction costs, operating costs, and management costs),
but the underutilized court is
replaced with the more versatile synthetic flooring. This option
provides flexibility and
adaptability at a low price, but the return remains at a relatively
modest 10.9%
Option 6 scales down as much as possible, eliminating the
multi-sport component all together
and paring down to one hardwood court and a fitness center.
This option has by far the smallest
footprint and construction costs, but also limits the ability to
serve a broad spectrum of the
community and returns only 9.0% of the investment over 5
years.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 11
Final Facility Design - Option 7
After an in-depth analysis and multiple discussions revolving
around models 1-6, a seventh and
final model was designed. It is a derivative of “Option 2”,
which was the most efficient model
analyzed in providing a diverse program offering while
responding to the market needs of the
surrounding Woodridge market place. For this model,
Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center’s
indoor facility is recommended to include one unboarded turf
field flanked by a basketball court
overlaid with three volleyball courts. The turf area is designed
to accommodate not only
traditional field sports such as soccer, football, and lacrosse,
but also field hockey and
baseball/softball training. More details on the facility design are
as follows:
Basketball court space (115’ x 85’)
o 2 cross-court functionality
Volleyball courts (three at 60’ x 30’ over
the above court space)
Unboarded turf field (180’ x 120’)
o 3 cross-field functionality
Batting cages/pitching tunnels (six at
75’ x 15’ over the turf field)
Fitness/Strength Room (100’ x 75’)
Aerobic Rooms (two at 40’ x 30’)
Fitness Locker Rooms (two at 30’ x 30’)
Elevated Jogging Track (860’ x 10’)
Child Watch Room (30’ x 30’)
Lobby/Welcome Area (30’ x 30’)
Café and Seating Area (40’ x 40’)
Multipurpose Rooms (two at 32’ x 32’,
divisible)
Staff Offices (four at 15’ x 15’)
General Office (30’ x 30’)
Outsource Space/CRC Classroom &
Computer Lab (two at 30’ x 30’)
Restrooms (three at 20’ x 20’)
Parking (estimated 230 spaces)
o 3 per 1000sf of building
Site Options
Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will sit on one of two
sites.
Site 1, called “TIF Site” for
identification purposes, is a 4-acre
parcel of land located on the
northeast corner of North Janes Ave
and 83rd St directly south of outdoor
fields already in use for park
programs. There is efficient street
access and if necessary, future
expansion is possible on the north
side of the building. The site’s
proximity to the fields allows for
shared parking and enhanced
services for residents, but the land is
privately owned and will need to
negotiate a reasonable purchase
price. The city has expressed an
initial willingness to provide a TIF
subsidy of $5 million. While formal
design has not yet begun and with it,
a site plan not yet designed, SFA has
analyzed the feasibility of a 4-acre
site for the 7 models described.
Figure 1 is a conceptual site diagram
Figure 1: Conceptual site lay-out for the “TIF Site” located at
North
Janes Ave and 83
rd
St. Building is denoted in red and parking in grey.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 12
demonstrating how the building footprint and parking could
work. While the site is “tight,” it
can accommodate the building footprint and necessary parking.
Site 2, called “Orchard Site” for
identification purposes, is located on
the east side of North Jane Ave. just
south of the 83rd St intersection. It is a
4.5-acre plot already owned by the park
system with southern adjacency to a
community aquatics center, also
allowing for some shared parking and a
maximization of space due to each
facility’s seasonality. Expansion would
be possible to the west. The fact that the
land is already owned by the Park
District eliminates the acquisition cost,
but the site is not located in a TIF
district, making none of the $5 million
TIF subsidies available. As an
additional note, the facility and
additional parking would be developed
over existing fields that are currently in
use by the park district for outdoor
programming, so that space would
likely need to be relocated. The cost for replacement of those
existing fields is not factored into
the financial analysis; however, those costs are real and should
be considered in site selection.
The table on the following page demonstrates a comparison of
the two sites utilizing the Model
7 (Final Facility Program Design) financial forecast.
Figure 2: Conceptual site lay-out for the “Orchard Site” located
on
the east side of North Janes Ave south of the 83
rd
St intersection.
Building is denoted in red and parking in grey.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 13
Based on the financial analysis, SFA recommends pursuing the
TIF site given the following
factors:
- The seller of the site is reasonable and is willing to sell the
site at market rate.
- The TIF subsidies are provided to aid in the development of
the facility.
- The site is “tight” and the design of the building and parking
can be accommodated on
the site as analyzed by SFA. This is predicated on a functional
plan for storm water
retention and the development authorities providing any
necessary variances and
adjustments to ordinances that will permit the development at
this location.
TIF Site Orchard Site
Fitness, 1 Court Gym, Turf Fitness, 1 Court Gym, Turf
76528.75 76528.75
Land + Sitework $3,200,000 $800,000
Hard Cost (building only) $12,093,278 $12,093,278
Field/Sport Equipment $1,087,137 $1,087,137
FF&E $351,750 $351,750
Soft Cost $1,497,754 $1,497,754
Sub Total $18,229,920 $15,829,920
TIF Land/Site Subsidy (TBD) ($3,200,000) $0
TIF Bldg. Subsidy (TBD) ($1,800,000) $0
PARC Grant ($2,500,000) $0 $0
Total $13,229,920 $15,829,920
Revenue $1,599,192 $1,599,192
Expense $1,503,035 $1,503,035
EBITDA $96,156 $96,156
Revenue $1,782,661 $1,782,661
Expense $1,548,875 $1,548,875
EBITDA $233,785 $233,785
Revenue $2,062,564 $2,062,564
Expense $1,648,148 $1,648,148
EBITDA $414,416 $414,416
Revenue $2,159,254 $2,159,254
Expense $1,700,773 $1,700,773
EBITDA $458,481 $458,481
Revenue $2,333,549 $2,333,549
Expense $1,776,136 $1,776,136
EBITDA $557,413 $557,413
Revenue $9,937,220 $9,937,220
Expense $8,176,968 $8,176,968
EBITDA $1,760,252 $1,760,252
Total Development ROI 9.7% 11.1%
Cash on Cash ROI 13.3% 11.1%
Year Four
Year Five
Cumulative
(5 Year)
C
o
n
s
tr
u
c
ti
o
n
&
S
ta
rt
-U
p
C
o
s
t
Model 7 Comparison
Year One
Year Two
Year Three
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 14
Financial Forecasting
Upon being retained, SFA reviewed the Park District’s existing
model, structure, and study for
the Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center project. SFA then
proceeded to complete its own
comprehensive analysis of the market, existing providers, and
opportunities. The forecasts for
each model and the subsequent recommendations were reached
through an application of
SFA’s standard methodology for financial analysis and
projections, which have been
successfully implemented and proven accurate in the
development of sports complexes across
the nation. The Park District reviewed SFA’s final analysis and
confirmed that it is realistic and
attainable; the result of the effort is a mutually approved,
thorough financial forecast with
supporting documentation to assess the feasibility of the
project.
The Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center business model will
feature a product/service mix
focused on leagues, tournaments, camps, clinics, and
instruction/training in sports such as
soccer, football, lacrosse, baseball, softball, basketball, and
volleyball. Complementing the
sports and training programs, Woodridge Athletic Recreation
Center will also offer plenty of
school-age programming and birthday parties. By combining
these elements at one site, it is the
desire of the Park District to create a hub of activity for the
local area and region and to provide
a full family experience that promotes player development,
competition, involvement,
entertainment, and participation. Also, Woodridge Athletic
Recreation Center will provide an
atmosphere of fun, healthy living, excitement, and a desire to
return season after season and
year after year.
The keys to success for Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center
include the Park District’s ability to
drive traffic into the facility, create an unmatched atmosphere
and facility that serves as a
popular destination and gathering spot, and effectively deliver
the variety of unique services
being considered. The Park District also has established and is
further building relationships
within the local and regional sports community; this will attract
current programs and leagues
and aid in the creation of new and exciting programs that will
benefit athletes and participants
of all ages and abilities. It should be noted that the Park
District is not a new operator in the
area, and it currently serves the residents with programming.
For that reason, it already has a
head start in communication, pubic relations, marketing, and a
track record with its customer
base.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 15
PROGRAMMING AND PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will be designed as a
“hub” for sports programming, player
development, training, and community recreation. As such, the
Park District acknowledges the
necessity for a diverse mix of products/services and the
implementation of various programs and
other offerings throughout the indoor facility. By providing
these various program spaces and
amenities, Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will offer
multiple athletic and recreational
activities to serve a wide range of user and community pursuits.
The facility will be designed as a
cross-marketing engine to increase revenue and develop Ideal
Customer Relationships©. Below is
a list of the various programs/revenue streams and product and
service offerings to be included
in the first year of operation and beyond:
Soccer
o Instructional Clinics & Camps
o Drop-in Play
o Tournaments
o Leagues
o Traveling Soccer
Basketball
o Instructional Clinics & Camps
o Drop-in Play
o Tournaments
o Leagues
Lacrosse
o Instructional Clinics & Camps
o Drop-in Play
o Tournaments
o Leagues
Football
o Instructional Clinics & Camps
o Drop-in Play
o Tournaments
o Leagues
Baseball/Softball
o Instructional Clinics & Camps
o Private Lessons
o Team Rentals
o Cage Rentals
o Drop-in Play
Volleyball
o Instructional Clinics & Camps
o Drop-in Play
o Leagues
Fitness & Training
o Personal Training
o Group Training Classes
o Group Exercise Classes
Membership
o Program Memberships
o Day Guest Passes
Court and Field Rentals
o Full-Court/Field Rentals
o Half-Field Rentals
Birthday Parties
o Turf Sport Parties
o Baseball Parties
o General/Non-Sport Parties
Corporate & Group Events
o Corporate Events and Parties
o Large Events and Parties
o Facility Rentals
Youth Programming
o Full-Day and Half-day Camps
o Single-day Camps
o Teen Programs
o Camp Daycare
o Lock-ins
o Before and After School Programs
o Field Trips
Food & Beverage
o Concessions
o Vending
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 16
Projected Revenue of Products and Services
The following table illustrates the revenue (and percentage of
revenue) that each product/service lends to the overall bottom
line. The
specific revenue and expense projections can be found in the
financial analysis section of this study and in the accompanying
detailed
pro-forma. The “Projected Revenue of Products and Services”
table demonstrates the diversified revenue base for Woodridge
Athletic
Recreation Center and how the various contributions increase
and are distributed over the first five years of operations. It is
important to
note that some secondary revenue-generating opportunities (i.e.
seasonal offerings per market demand) have not been included.
$ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ %
Fitness Memberships $510,972 32% $540,026 30% $623,730
30% $654,916 30% $687,662 29% $176,690 35%
Basketball $61,055 4% $70,213 4% $81,096 4% $85,151 4%
$93,879 4% $32,824 54%
Volleyball $34,550 2% $39,733 2% $45,891 2% $48,186 2%
$53,125 2% $18,575 54%
Court Events (Tournaments) $21,888 1% $25,171 1% $29,073
1% $30,526 1% $33,655 1% $11,767 54%
Court Rentals $45,000 3% $49,500 3% $54,574 3% $54,574 3%
$57,302 2% $12,302 27%
Competitive and Travel Soccer $135,975 9% $156,371 9%
$180,609 9% $189,639 9% $209,077 9% $73,102 54%
Recreational/Child Development Soccer$64,416 4% $74,629 4%
$85,900 4% $90,904 4% $99,512 4% $35,096 54%
Lacrosse $17,100 1% $23,665 1% $27,333 1% $28,700 1%
$31,641 1% $14,541 85%
Football $31,425 2% $36,139 2% $41,740 2% $43,827 2%
$48,320 2% $16,895 54%
Baseball/Softball $44,830 3% $51,555 3% $59,545 3% $62,523
3% $68,931 3% $24,101 54%
Field Rental $76,500 5% $84,150 5% $88,358 4% $88,358 4%
$92,775 4% $16,275 21%
Birthday Parties $32,400 2% $37,260 2% $43,035 2% $45,187
2% $49,819 2% $17,419 54%
Performance Fitness & Training $80,800 5% $92,920 5%
$107,323 5% $112,689 5% $124,239 5% $43,439 54%
Corporate & Group Events $23,000 1% $26,450 1% $32,005 2%
$33,605 2% $37,049 2% $14,049 61%
Youth Programming $346,351 22% $398,304 22% $481,947
23% $506,045 23% $557,914 24% $211,563 61%
Food & Beverage $72,930 5% $76,577 4% $80,405 4% $84,426
4% $88,647 4% $15,717 22%
Total Revenue $1,599,192 100% $1,782,661 100% $2,062,564
100% $2,159,254 100% $2,333,549 100% $734,357 46%
∆ Growth Yr. 1 to Yr. 5Projected Revenue of Products
and Services
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 17
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 18
THE MANAGEMENT TEAM
The Management Team consists of the Board of Park
Commissioners, whose primary
responsibility is to set policy and oversee all financial
obligations of the proposed facility. The
Board is supported by the existing Administrative Staff
consisting of the Executive Director,
Deputy Director/Superintendent of Recreation, Superintendent
of Finance and Personnel,
Superintendent of Park Operations and the Assistant
Superintendent of Recreation; whose
primary responsibilities are to develop and administer financial,
administrative, personnel and
operations procedures in compliance with the policies
established by the Park Board. Facility
Management staff responsible for the day to day operations will
consist of a Facility Supervisor,
Recreation Supervisor, Athletic Supervisor, Fitness Manager,
and Maintenance Supervisor. The
Management Team will report to the Park Board, as currently
reported for other District
facilities, on all aspects relative to the overall operational and
financial performance of the
facility.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 19
Market Analysis
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 20
FACILITY LOCATION & SITE ACCESSIBILITY
A suburb of Chicago, located primarily in DuPage County,
Woodridge is located in northeastern Illinois about 30 miles
southwest of downtown Chicago (see shaded area to the right).
Market Accessibility
Both the TIF Site and Orchard Site are located near 83rd Street
between
North Janes Avenue and the Veteran’s Memorial Tollway (TIF
Site is
north of 83rd, Orchard Site is south). Both locations are on/next
to
already-in-use Parks and Rec pieces of land, making the facility
a
natural fit in a known and established area.
Either site will allow the facility and the Park District to draw
players and patrons from the
local area and region for training, leagues, tournaments, and
other instructional programs such
as camps and clinics. Such market penetration is critical to
facility utilization and sustainability.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6a/Illinois_-
_outline_map.svg
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 21
MARKET DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
Depending on the business model, different parameters are
applied when analyzing a market (demographics, participation,
existing
providers, etc.). For a sports and recreation facility located in a
densely populated region such as the Chicago market, industry
metrics
dictate that a 30-minute drive time area would serve as the
“target market” from which to capture facility participants and
patrons for
regular league, tournament, and training programs. It is this 30-
minute demarcation that is employed when analyzing the test
facility
(Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center) against existing service
providers in the area and market reach for specific programming
such as
soccer, lacrosse, baseball, softball, basketball, volleyball, etc.
The map above depicts Woodridge ARC surrounded by 10-, 15-,
and 30-minute drivetimes. The map illustrates population
by zip code, with the darker colors representing the denser
areas.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 22
The map above depicts Woodridge ARC surrounded by 10-, 15-,
and 30-minute drivetimes. The map illustrates median
household
income by zip code, with the darker colors representing the
higher income areas. Demographic data provided by
Demographics Now.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 23
Key Demographics
As the table to the right demonstrates,
Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center is
located in a heavily populated area.
What stands out about the
demographic factors is that the target
market surrounding Woodridge
Athletic Recreation Center is stable,
young, and affluent. The surrounding
area is expected to remain highly
populated without having to
accommodate for the influx of people
seen in many markets; the median
age in each of the drive time
circumferences analyzed is in line
with the U.S. average; and the
median household income is
significantly higher than the national
average.
Potential Sports Participation
To project the number of teams
Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center
can expect to capture from the
current market, SFA utilized local
participation rates reported by
American Sports Data, Inc. (ASD), the
National Sporting Goods Association
(NSGA), and the Sporting Goods
Manufacturers Association (SGMA).
These reports take into account only
active sports participants who play
their respective sport in an organized
format a set amount of times per
year.
Sports Participation - 30-minute Drivetime
Sport
Registered
Participant %
Potential
Participants
Baseball 5.1% 79,024
Basketball 12.7% 199,126
Football 5.1% 79,416
Soccer 5.3% 82,937
Softball 7.9% 123,622
Volleyball 4.3% 66,506
Futsal 2.4% 37,165
Lacrosse 1.1% 17,213
* Note: existing providers are not factored into this “pool” of
participants. The “potential participants” are the number of
individuals that the facility and the management team could
target for the respective activities. The actual participants
would result from a closing percentage of these “potential
participants.”
Key Demographic Factors
Category
10
minutes
15
minutes
30
minutes
Total Population
(2011 Estimate)
89,902 222,932 1,564,840
Total Population
(2016 Projection)
89,345 221,730 1,564,448
Expected Pop. Change
(2011-2016)
-0.6% -0.5% 0.0%
Median Age
(U.S. = 36.95)
37.7 37.2 36
Median HH Income
(U.S. = $49,726)
$75,667 $76,529 $75,552
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 24
• EXISTING PROVIDER ANALYSIS
As can be expected in a market of this size with such favorable
key demographic factors, there
are a significant number of existing providers in the area. In
order to determine the share of the
market that Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center can expect to
capture, SFA performed an in-
depth analysis of the local providers. That analysis is based on
the following factors:
• Proximity to existing providers
• Sports and Programs offered relative to existing providers
• Other services offered
• Pricing advantages
• Facility quality, aesthetics, and amenities
• Existing providers within the desired demographic
Based on an indoor turf, court, and fitness model, Woodridge
Athletic Recreation Center must
consider five primary categories of similar providers: 1)
Existing Turf Providers; 2) Existing
Court Providers; 3) Existing BB/SB Training Providers; 4)
Existing Fitness Providers; and 5)
Existing YMCA/Rec Centers. A provider map for each of those
categories can be found on the
pages that follow.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 25
Woodridge ARC
Drive time (30 mins)
Turf
1. Ditka’s Sports Dome
2. Seven Bridges Ice Arena
3. Darien Sportsplex
4. Westmont Yard Indoor Sports
5. Bo Jackson Elite Sports
6. Ackerman SFC (Glen Ellyn)
7. Players Indoor Sports Center
8. The Max
9. Bridgeview Sports Dome
10. Sport Zone Family Fun Center
11. Just for Kicks
12. Elite Sports Performance
13. PlayUSA Indoor
14. ChiTown Futbol
15. Finish Strong Indoor Sportsplex
16. Chicago Sports Zone
17. Sportsplex St Charles
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 26
Woodridge ARC
Drive time (30 mins)
Court
1. Bulls/Sox Training Academy
2. Sunsetters Volleyball
3. Walker Athletics
4. Ackerman Sports & Fitness
Center
5. Players Indoor Sports Center
6. The Max
7. Wheaton Park CAC
8. Illinois Basketball Academy
9. Great Lakes Volleyball Center
10. Sugar Grove Sports Center
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 27
Woodridge ARC
Drive time (30 mins)
Baseball/Softball Training
1. Perfect Swing
2. Bulls/Sox Training Academy
3. Quarry Fieldhouse
4. Bo Jackson Elite Sports
5. Ackerman Sports & Fitness
6. The Max
7. Bridgeview Sports Dome
8. Naperville Baseball Academy
9. Centerfield Sports Academy
10. Elite Sports Performance
11. Finish Strong Indoor Sportsplex
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 28
Woodridge ARC
Drive time (15 mins)
Fitness
1. Curves
2. LA Fitness
3. Blast Fitness
4. Women’s Workout World
5. X Sport Fitness
6. Edward Health & Fitness
7. Curves
8. Cardinal Fitness
9. Walker Athletics
10. Midtown Athletic Club
11. Good Samaritan Hospital HWC
12. ATI Fitness Center
13. Lifetime Fitness
14. Five Seasons Family Sports Club
15. Edward Health & Fitness-
Naperville
16. Anytime Fitness
17. Lifetime Fitness
18. LifeStart Central Park Athletic
Club
19. Curves
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 29
Woodridge ARC
Drive time (30 mins)
YMCA
1. Indian Boundary YMCA (Downers
Grove)
2. Kroeler Family YMCA (Naperville)
3. YMCA Sports Complex
Recreation Centers
1. Darien Park District Fitness Center
2. Bolingbrook Annerino Comm.
Center
3. Lemont Park District CORE
4. Lisle Community Park Fitness
Center
5. Downers Grove Park District Rec
Center
6. Bolingbrook Park District RAC
7. Ackerman SPC (Glen Ellyn)
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 30
EXISTING TURF PROVIDERS
Ditka's Sports Dome (www.ditkasportsdome.com)
Located approximately 4 minutes away in Bolingbrook, Ditka’s
Sports Dome features a 70,000
square foot dome with an unboarded turf field and a 44 station,
2-deck driving range.
Seven Bridges Ice Arena (www.sevenbridgesicearena.com )
Located approximately 6 minutes away in Woodridge, Seven
Bridges Ice Arena features two ice
sheets and one small unboarded turf field used for programs
including Lil’ Kickers.
Darien Sportsplex (www.dariensportsplex.com)
Located approximately 10 minutes away in Darien, Darien
Sportsplex features three ice sheets
and a 185’ x 85’' turf field. The facility is owned by the park
district.
Westmont Yard Indoor Sports (www.westmontyard.com)
Located approximately 12 minutes away in Westmont,
Westmont Yard Indoor Sports features a
270’ x 180’ field that divides into three 180’ x 90’ fields and is
used for a variety of indoor sports.
Bo Jackson’s Elite Sports (www.bojacksonselitesports.com)
Located approximately 19 minutes away in Lockport, Bo
Jackson’s Elite Sports features two
major league-size infields with adjustable base paths, a
multipurpose field measuring 110’ x
195’, a three-lane 80-yard track, state of the art agility and
speed training area, and 12 batting
cages with professional clay mounds. The facility also has a
team store, concessions, and rehab
clinic.
Ackerman Sports & Fitness Center
(www.ackermansportsandfitnesscenter.com)
Located approximately 22 minutes away in Glen Ellyn,
Ackerman Sports & Fitness Center is an
88,000 square foot multi-purpose facility, including a 180’ x
120’ multi-purpose turf field, three
high school-size wood basketball courts, two 30-foot climbing
rocks, batting cages, an elevated,
multi-lane walking/running/jogging track, a 7,000 SF fitness
center, multipurpose rooms for
fitness classes, locker rooms, and meeting rooms. The facility is
owned by the park district.
Players Indoor Sports Center (www.playersindoor.com)
Located approximately 22 minutes away in Naperville, Players
Indoor Sports Center is a 95,000
SF facility featuring three 200’ x 100’' boarded fields, one
unboarded 80’ x 50’ training field, and
two volleyball courts.
McCook Athletic & Expo (MAX) (www.max-mccook.com)
Located approximately 22 minutes away in McCook, MAX is a
125,000 SF facility that features
two full-sized basketball courts, volleyball courts, and a
baseball/softball academy, and is
headlined by a 408’ x 159’ full unboarded field that can be
divided into four 159’ x 102’ pods.
MAX is Chicago's first full-sized outdoor field under roof; it is
positioned under a 40’ clear-span
roof.
Bridgeview Sports Dome (www.bridgeview-il.gov/dome/)
Located approximately 24 minutes away in Bridgeview,
Bridgeview Sports Dome is a 90,000 SF
facility featuring a variety of sporting activities, plus free
chipping and putting areas. The Dome
can be reserved for indoor soccer, softball, baseball, whiffle
ball, football practice or leagues,
seminars, meetings and parties.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 31
Sport Zone Family Fun Center (www.sportzonepark.com)
Located approximately 26 minutes away in Aurora, Sport Zone
Family Fun Center is a dome
structure featuring an unboarded field used for a variety of
sports.
Just for Kicks (www.justforkicks.org)
Located approximately 27 minutes away in Plainfield, Just for
Kicks is a 50,000 SF facility that
features two 100’ x 200’ fields and two full-size outdoor fields
behind the building.
Elite Sports Performance (www.espcomplex.com)
Located approximately 27 minutes away in Oswego, Elite
Sports Performance features two
unboarded 110’ x 65’' turf fields, seven baseball tunnels, and a
sports performance training area.
PlayUSA Indoor (www.playusasoccer.org)
Located approximately 28 minutes away in Aurora, PlayUSA
Indoor features a 90’' x 40’' field
and a 188’' x 90’' field. Both are unboarded.
ChiTown Futbol (www.chitownfutbol.com)
Located approximately 30 minutes away in Chicago, ChiTown
Futbol features two 171’ x 65’'
and one 80’ x 50’' boarded turf field.
Finish Strong Indoor Sportsplex
(www.finishstrongsportsplex.com)
Located approximately 31 minutes away in West Chicago,
Finish Strong Indoor Sportsplex is a
baseball training-focused facility with one 160’ x 75’ boarded
turf field, one 95’ x 84’' open turf
field used for baseball, drop down tunnels, and training areas.
Soccer and lacrosse programs are
also featured.
Chicago Sports Zone (www.chicagosportszone.com)
Located approximately 35 minutes away in Melrose Park,
Chicago Sports Zone features two
185’ x 85’ boarded fields, a small fitness center, and a bar.
SportsPlex St. Charles (www.sportsplexstc.net)
Located approximately 46 minutes away in St. Charles,
SportsPlex St. Charles is a 62,500 SF
facility featuring two indoor soccer fields, locker rooms,
showers, a soccer store, a concession
stand, a sports performance center, and a dance studio.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 32
EXISTING COURT PROVIDERS
Bulls Sox Training Academy (www.bullssoxacademy.com)
Located approximately 9 minutes away in Lisle, Bulls Sox
Training Academy is a 57,000 SF
facility owned by the Chicago Bulls and Chicago White Sox and
features three courts, baseball
training with 13 tunnels, and a sports fitness center.
Sunsetters Volleyball Facility (www.sunsettersvbc.org)
Located approximately 11 minutes away in Woodridge,
Sunsetters Volleyball Facility features
four volleyball sport courts.
Walker Athletics and Sports Performance Complex
(www.walkerathletic.com)
Located approximately 14 minutes away in Lisle, Walker
Athletics and Sports Performance
Complex is a 100,000 SF facility featuring four hardwood
basketball courts and a 12,000 SF
fitness center.
Ackerman Sports & Fitness Center
(www.ackermansportsandfitnesscenter.com)
See above.
Players Indoor Sports Center (www.playersindoor.com)
See above.
McCook Athletic & Expo (MAX) (www.max-mccook.com)
See above.
Wheaton Park Central Athletic Center
(www.wheatonparkdistrict.com)
Located approximately 23 minutes away in Wheaton, Wheaton
Park Central Athletic Center
features four hardwood basketball courts, three volleyball
courts, two batting cages, and party
rooms.
Illinois Basketball Academy (www.ibahoops.com)
Located approximately 24 minutes away in Naperville, Illinois
Basketball Academy features
four synthetic courts and competitive basketball programs.
Great Lakes Volleyball Center (www.greatlakescenter.com)
Located approximately 27 minutes away in Aurora, Great Lakes
Volleyball Center is a 60,000
SF facility featuring eight volleyball courts, a training room, a
weight training facility, a 10,000
SF mezzanine, and a team store.
Sugar Grove Sports Center (www.sg-sports.com)
Located approximately 41 minutes away in Sugar Grove, this
facility features two-basketball
courts and baseball training.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 33
EXISTING BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL TRAINING
PROVIDERS
Perfect Swing (www.perfectswingil.com)
Located approximately 6 minutes away in Darien, Perfect Swing
features a 38,000 SF training
facility.
Bulls Sox Training Academy (www.bullssoxacademy.com)
See above.
The Quarry Fieldhouse (www.quarryfieldhouse.com)
Located approximately 15 minutes away in Romeoville, The
Quarry Fieldhouse features a large
open turf area for training and multiple baseball tunnels.
Bo Jackson’s Elite Sports (www.bojacksonselitesports.com)
See above.
Ackerman Sports & Fitness Center
(www.ackermansportsandfitnesscenter.com)
See above.
McCook Athletic & Expo (MAX) (www.max-mccook.com)
See above.
Bridgeview Sports Dome (www.bridgeview-il.gov)
See above.
Naperville Baseball Academy (www.5toolschool.com)
Located approximately 24 minutes away in Naperville,
Naperville Baseball Academy is a 7,200
SF facility featuring seven tunnels.
Centerfield Sports Academy
(www.centerfieldsportsacademy.com)
Located approximately 24 minutes away in Naperville,
Centerfield Sports Academy features
three auto cages, four tunnels, four mound areas, and a 120’ x
50' infield space.
Elite Sports Performance (www.espcomplex.com)
See above.
Finish Strong Indoor Sportsplex
(www.finishstrongsportsplex.com)
See above.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 34
EXISTING YMCA AND REC CENTERS
Indian Boundary YMCA
(www.ymcachicago.org/indianboundary)
Located approximately 13 minutes away in Downers Grove,
Indian Boundary YMCA features a
fitness center, three courts, a walking track, a six-lane pool, a
rock wall, and a skate park.
Kroeler Family YMCA (www.ymcachicago.org/kroehler)
Located approximately 17 minutes away in Naperville, Kroeler
Family YMCA features a fitness
center with classes, an indoor track, a gym, and aquatics.
YMCA Sports Complex
(www.ymcachicago.org/ysportscomplex)
Located approximately 25 minutes away in Naperville, YMCA
Sports Complex features five
synthetic basketball courts, a walking track, and cardio and
weight equipment.
Darien Park District Fitness Center
(www.darienparks.com/FitnessCenter.aspx)
Located approximately 9 minutes away in Darien, Darien Park
District Fitness Center features a
3,900 SF fitness center.
Bolingbrook Annerino Community Center
(www.bolingbrookparks.org)
Located approximately 10 minutes away in Bolingbrook,
Bolingbrook Annerino Community
Center features a Lifestyles fitness center, a gymnastics a,
dance, rock wall, and a preschool.
Lemont Park District CORE Fitness & Aquatic Complex
(www.lemontparks.org)
Located approximately 10 minutes away in Lemont, Lemont
Park District CORE Fitness &
Aquatic Complex features a fitness center, indoor/outdoor pool,
21,000 SF three-court gym, an
elevated track, and massage therapy.
Lisle Community Park Fitness Center
(www.lisleparkdistrict.org)
Located approximately 12 minutes away in Lisle, Lisle
Community Park Fitness Center features
a fitness center, with cardio and classes.
Downers Grove Park District Rec Center
(www.dgparks.org/facilities/recreation-center.htm)
Located approximately 13 minutes away in Downers Grove,
Downers Grove Park District Rec
Center is a 69,000 SF facility featuring a fitness center, 20,000
SF three-court gym, an elevated
track, and a multi-purpose center.
Bolingbrook Park District Recreation & Aquatic Complex
(www.bolingbrookparks.org)
Located approximately 14 minutes away in Bolingbrook, this
complex features a fitness center
with aerobic studios, indoor/outdoor aquatics, a 16,000 SF gym,
and multipurpose rooms.
Ackerman Sports & Fitness Center
(www.ackermansportsandfitnesscenter.com)
See above.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 35
EXISTING FITNESS PROVIDERS
Curves (www.curves.com)
Located approximately 4 minutes away in Darien, Curves
features fitness for women only.
LA Fitness (www.lafitness.com)
Located approximately 4 minutes away in Bolingbrook, LA
Fitness features fitness, a basketball
court, classes, and an indoor pool.
Blast Fitness (www.signup.myiclubonline.com)
Located approximately 6 minutes away in Downers Grove, Blast
Fitness features fitness for
$10/month and fitness with classes and tanning for $20/month.
Women's Workout World (www.w3body.com)
Located approximately 7 minutes away in Downers Grove,
Women's Workout World features
fitness for women only.
X Sport Fitness (www.xsportfitness.com)
Located approximately 7 minutes away in Darien, X Sport
Fitness features fitness, classes, a pro
shop, and tanning for $20/month.
Edward Health & Fitness (www.edward.org/fitness)
Located approximately 8 minutes away in Woodridge, Edward
Health & Fitness features
fitness, an indoor track, courts, classes, a spa, aquatics, and
retail.
Curves (www.curves.com)
Located approximately 12 minutes away in Westmont, Curves
features fitness for women only.
Cardinal Fitness (www.charterfitness.com)
Located approximately 13 minutes away in Westmont, Cardinal
Fitness features fitness for
$10/month at a single location or $20/month at all locations.
Walker Athletics and Sports Performance Complex
(www.walkerathletic.com)
See above.
Midtown Athletic Club (www.midtown.com)
Located approximately 15 minutes away in Willowbrook,
Midtown Athletic Club features
fitness, indoor tennis, an indoor track, one court, an indoor
pool, a spa, and a pro shop.
Good Samaritan Hospital Health and Wellness Center
(www.advocatehealth.com)
Located approximately 15 minutes away in Downers Grove,
Good Samaritan Hospital Health
and Wellness Center is a 90,000 SF fitness club with three
indoor pools, an indoor track, a fitness
and weight room, three group fitness rooms, and a basketball
court.
ATI Fitness Center (www.atipt.com)
Located approximately 15 minutes away in Downers Grove, ATI
Fitness Center features fitness
and classes for $25/month.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 36
Lifetime Fitness (www.clubs.lifetimefitness.com)
Located approximately 15 minutes away in Romeoville,
Lifetime Fitness features fitness,
classes, an indoor pool, an outdoor pool, a court, a rock wall,
racquetball, and a spa.
Five Seasons Family Sports Club
(www.fiveseasonssportsclu.reachlocal.com)
Located approximately 15 minutes away in Burr Ridge, Five
Seasons Family Sports Club
features fitness, indoor tennis, a spa, and a pool.
Edward Health & Fitness (www.edward.org/fitness)
Located approximately 16 minutes away in Naperville, Edward
Health & Fitness features
fitness, an indoor track, courts, classes, a spa, aquatics, and
retail.
Anytime Fitness (www.anytimefitness.com)
Located approximately 16 minutes away in Naperville, Anytime
Fitness features 24 hour
fitness.
Lifetime Fitness (www.clubs.lifetimefitness.com)
Located approximately 16 minutes away in Burr Ridge, Lifetime
Fitness features fitness, classes,
an indoor pool, an outdoor pool, a court, a rock wall,
racquetball, and a spa.
LifeStart Central Park Athletic Club (www.lifestart.net)
Located approximately 16 minutes away in Lisle, LifeStart
Central Park Athletic Club features
fitness, an indoor pool, classes, and a court.
Curves (www.curves.com)
Located approximately 17 minutes away in Naperville, Curves
features fitness for women only.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 37
SUMMARY OF EXISTING SERVICE PROVIDERS
Due to the broad scope of activities Woodridge Athletic
Recreation Center will offer its users, the
facility encounters a significant number of existing providers in
both the “immediate trade
area,” defined as a 15-minute drive time, and the “local trade
area,” defined as a 30-minute
drive time.
The 15-minute drive time is used to determine which existing
providers will have the greatest impact on the operations of
Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center due to the fact that they
are, for all intents and purposes, neighbors. A 30-minute drive
time is the industry standard “local trade area” for a sports
facility, as patrons will typically drive approximately 1/3 of
the time that they will actually spend at the facility. Given that
the typical stay for a patron at a
sports facility is 1 ½ hours (60 minutes for competition or
training plus 15 minutes warm-up
and 15 minutes post event or workout); this means that patrons
will typically drive 30 minutes
each way.
The existing provider drive time circumference for fitness
facilities is smaller. The industry
standard for identifying existing providers is an 8-minute drive
time, but SFA uses a 10- and a
15-minute range to achieve conservative, realistic estimates of
market share.
It is critical to understand that there is a significant difference
between the quantity of existing
providers and the quality of existing providers. Chicago land is
a large, densely populated area,
and it should come as no surprise that there are a wide range of
existing providers in the realms
of sports, recreation, and fitness. SFA’s practice is to identify
every existing facility and to weigh
each one based on quality. The result is an accurate
determination of participation and market
retention.
In the court market, four of the existing providers are top-tier
facilities: BullSox, Walker, IBA,
and YMCA Sports Complex. These existing providers headline a
list of 14 facilities with court
programming (fitness providers with courts are not included),
leaving a significant opening to
draw basketball players from the local trade area. Based on
participation rates and opportunity,
Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center can expect to host 120
basketball teams and 36 volleyball
teams in its first year, bringing in a majority of the $162,500 in
forecasted court revenue.
In the turf market, another four existing providers are top-tier
facilities: Ackerman, Players
Indoor, The Max, and ChiTown. These existing providers lead a
group of 14 facilities, again
leaving a large opportunity for Woodridge Athletic Recreation
Center. Year one should see 167
soccer teams, 81 football teams, and 22 lacrosse teams enter the
facility, contributing to $325,400
in forecasted turf revenue.
Baseball and Softball training facilities exhibit the highest
quality for traditional sports
opportunities in the market, with four out of nine facilities
qualifying as top-tier existing
providers. Although Perfect Swing, BullSox, Bo Jackson’s Elite
Sports, and Quarry Fieldhouse
will all draw a significant amount of the market, the
participation, interest, and spending rates
in baseball/softball are high enough to forecast that teams,
leagues, memberships, lessons,
camps, and rentals will yield $44,800 in revenue.
● ● ●
‘Immediate’ Trade Area =
15 minutes
‘Local’ Trade Area =
30 minutes
● ● ●
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 38
Fitness facilities in the 15-minute local trade area are both
dense and high in quality. LA Fitness,
Edward Health and Fitness, Walker, Midtown, Good Samaritan,
Lifetime, and Five Seasons are
all head-of-class, but Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center
will be able to capitalize on its key
differentiators and unique positioning to generate over $590,000
worth of membership and
fitness/training revenue in its first year.
In summary, Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will benefit
from the strong size of the market,
density of the population, sizeable participation rates, and high
income levels in the area. While
there are a significant number of existing providers, there is
room for a thoughtfully planned,
well-managed facility to run a profitable operation with court,
turf, and fitness components at
the core of the business.
In order to ensure that profitability, Woodridge Athletic
Recreation Center will need to focus on
how it differentiates itself from existing providers. This can be
accomplished through
programming and amenities as well as the quality, cleanliness,
and level of customer service. In
order to protect and improve upon Woodridge Athletic
Recreation Center’s initial market position,
the experience at this facility must be superior to that of any
existing providers in the area, as
well as any future facilities. As Woodridge Athletic Recreation
Center becomes successful, other
entrepreneurs could begin to consider creating a similar facility,
which would further increase
the number providers in the market. The physical structure and
products of the facility could be
created with the appropriate resources. However, the experience
within the walls will be the
greatest barriers of entry for potential new providers.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 39
Financial Analysis
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 40
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS
Operational revenues were accounted for based on SFA’s
proven metrics for calculating the
number of individuals and teams within the facility’s radius of
influence and the percentage of
that market that Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will
capture.
Programming Revenues & Expenses
The overall operating budget is generally a component of the
overall service philosophy of the
facility’s primary purpose. The following revenues and
expenses are based on observations of
comparable facilities, stakeholder interviews, market research,
and industry leading practices
utilizing proprietary forecasting formulas. To meet the
following projections, SFA and the Park
District recognize that the facility must:
1. Implement a mix of program elements that generate revenue,
while attracting a wide
range of age groups to accommodate the needs of families,
children, teens, and adults, as
well as varying levels of competition. The programming will be
targeted to maximize
youth sports and training activities during peak times and
secondary markets (adults,
seniors, corporations, etc.) during non-peak times.
2. Implement a marketing plan while leveraging the existing
park district customer base
that includes proper pricing points, operating hours, and an
aggressive rollout and
community outreach campaign, as well as continual brand
development and industry
leading tactics to attract users post opening.
3. Employ a strong leadership team, which can plan and meet
the goals of the facility and
take the right actions to attract users to the facility, sustain
current members post-
opening, increase members and revenue-generating events, and
effectively manage the
day-to-day operation.
With success in each of those three areas, Woodridge Athletic
Recreation Center can expect to
achieve the revenue and expense projections outlined in the
table below.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 41
Total Facility Revenue & Expenses
Revenue Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Fitness Memberships $510,972 $540,026 $623,730 $654,916
$687,662
Basketball $61,055 $70,213 $81,096 $85,151 $93,879
Volleyball $34,550 $39,733 $45,891 $48,186 $53,125
Court Events (Tournaments) $21,888 $25,171 $29,073 $30,526
$33,655
Court Rentals $45,000 $49,500 $54,574 $54,574 $57,302
Competitive and Travel Soccer $135,975 $156,371 $180,609
$189,639 $209,077
Recreational/Child Development Soccer $64,416 $74,629
$85,900 $90,904 $99,512
Lacrosse $17,100 $23,665 $27,333 $28,700 $31,641
Football $31,425 $36,139 $41,740 $43,827 $48,320
Baseball/Softball $44,830 $51,555 $59,545 $62,523 $68,931
Field Rental $76,500 $84,150 $88,358 $88,358 $92,775
Birthday Parties $32,400 $37,260 $43,035 $45,187 $49,819
Performance Fitness & Training $80,800 $92,920 $107,323
$112,689 $124,239
Rockwall $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Corporate & Group Events $23,000 $26,450 $32,005 $33,605
$37,049
Youth Programming $346,351 $398,304 $481,947 $506,045
$557,914
Secondary Areas $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Food & Beverage $72,930 $76,577 $80,405 $84,426 $88,647
Total Revenue $1,599,192 $1,782,661 $2,062,564 $2,159,254
$2,333,549
Expenses Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Fitness Memberships $134,804 $125,109 $140,878 $147,344
$154,053
Basketball $38,465 $43,533 $50,165 $52,673 $57,945
Volleyball $14,299 $16,047 $18,481 $19,405 $21,335
Court Events (Tournaments) $8,425 $8,880 $10,065 $10,530
$11,450
Court Rentals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Competitive and Travel Soccer $45,129 $50,335 $58,131
$61,037 $67,286
Recreational/Child Development Soccer $28,527 $36,314
$41,636 $44,203 $48,095
Lacrosse $8,198 $10,751 $12,313 $12,928 $14,138
Football $13,181 $14,796 $17,020 $17,871 $19,625
Baseball/Softball $13,053 $14,495 $16,742 $17,579 $19,381
Field Rental $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Birthday Parties $13,716 $13,013 $14,909 $15,654 $17,125
Performance Fitness & Training $50,096 $39,210 $45,288
$47,552 $52,427
Rockwall $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Corporate & Group Events $3,450 $3,692 $4,040 $4,194 $4,441
Youth Programming $209,290 $230,538 $255,028 $265,060
$281,987
Secondary Areas $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Food & Beverage $43,150 $45,308 $47,573 $49,952 $52,449
Total Cost of Goods Sold $623,783 $652,022 $732,268
$765,983 $821,739
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 42
Gross Margin $975,409 $1,130,639 $1,330,296 $1,393,271
$1,511,810
% of Revenue 61% 63% 64% 65% 65%
Facility Expenses $339,956 $346,819 $353,830 $360,939
$368,215
Management Payroll $422,600 $431,052 $439,673 $448,467
$457,436
Payroll Taxes/Benefits/Bonus $116,696 $118,983 $122,377
$125,385 $128,746
Total Operating Expenses $879,252 $896,854 $915,880
$934,790 $954,397
EBITDA $96,156 $233,785 $414,416 $458,481 $557,413
% of Revenue 6% 13% 20% 21% 24%
Total Net Income $96,156 $233,785 $414,416 $458,481
$557,413
As demonstrated, success in programming, marketing, and
leadership will result in a sizeable
return on investment for the operating company. Earnings
before interest, tax, debt, and
amortization are expected at 6% in year 1 and projected to
balloon to 24% in year 5.
The Park District will assume debt service for the capital
improvement from existing funds. The
debt service is excluded from the operational pro forma
EBITDA (NOI) projections.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 43
Payroll
The following table represents the estimated payroll structure
required for the programming at
Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center:
Facility Management Payroll Summary Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Year 4 Year 5
Facility Supervisor (Director of Operations)(FT) $55,000
$56,100 $57,222 $58,366 $59,534
Asst. Facility Supervisors (2 - PT) $48,000 $48,960 $49,939
$50,938 $51,957
Athletic Supervisor (Program Director)(FT) $43,000 $43,860
$44,737 $45,632 $46,545
Recreation Supervisor @ 50% (Kids Squad/Camps)(FT) $21,840
$22,277 $22,722 $23,177 $23,640
Fitness Manager (FT) $40,000 $40,800 $41,616 $42,448
$43,297
Marketing & PR Assistant $18,720 $19,094 $19,476 $19,866
$20,263
Facility Maintenance Supervisor (FT) $37,000 $37,740 $38,495
$39,265 $40,050
Maintenance (Grounds) @ 50% of Payroll (FT) $18,720 $19,094
$19,476 $19,866 $20,263
Maintenance Custodial l (2-PT) $33,280 $33,946 $34,625
$35,317 $36,023
Registration/Customer Service Representative (FT) $37,440
$38,189 $38,953 $39,732 $40,526
Registration/Customer Service Representative (PT) $38,400
$39,168 $39,951 $40,750 $41,565
Subtotal Facility Management $391,400 $399,228 $407,213
$415,357 $423,664
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 44
Total Payroll Summary Pre-Open Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Year 5
Facility Supervisor (Director of Operations)(FT) $27,500
$55,000 $56,100 $57,222 $58,366 $59,534
Asst. Facility Supervisors (2 - PT) $24,000 $48,000 $48,960
$49,939 $50,938 $51,957
Athletic Supervisor (Program Director)(FT) $21,500 $43,000
$43,860 $44,737 $45,632 $46,545
Recreation Supervisor @ 50% (Kids Squad/Camps)(FT) $10,920
$21,840 $22,277 $22,722 $23,177 $23,640
Fitness Manager (FT) $20,000 $40,000 $40,800 $41,616
$42,448 $43,297
Marketing & PR Assistant $9,360 $18,720 $19,094 $19,476
$19,866 $20,263
Facility Maintenance Supervisor (FT) $9,250 $37,000 $37,740
$38,495 $39,265 $40,050
Maintenance (Grounds) @ 50% of Payroll (FT) $4,680 $18,720
$19,094 $19,476 $19,866 $20,263
Maintenance Custodial l (2-PT) $8,320 $33,280 $33,946
$34,625 $35,317 $36,023
Registration/Customer Service Representative (FT) $3,120
$37,440 $38,189 $38,953 $39,732 $40,526
Registration/Customer Service Representative (PT) $3,200
$38,400 $39,168 $39,951 $40,750 $41,565
Subtotal Facility Management $141,850 $391,400 $399,228
$407,213 $415,357 $423,664
Human Resources Generalist - PT (Additional Hours) $2,600
$10,400 $10,608 $10,820 $11,037 $11,257
Finance Assistant (A/P) - PT (Added Position) $5,200 $20,800
$21,216 $21,640 $22,073 $22,515
IT (TBD) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal Finance/HR/IT Payroll $7,800 $31,200 $31,824
$32,460 $33,110 $33,772
Fitness Membership Coordinator (Performed by Fitness
Mgr.) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Court Coordinator (Basketball) $1,526 $6,106 $7,021 $8,110
$8,515 $9,388
Court Coordinator (Volleyball) $864 $3,455 $3,973 $4,589
$4,819 $5,312
Court Coordinator (Tournaments) $274 $1,094 $1,259 $1,454
$1,526 $1,683
Turf Coordinator (Traveling Soccer) $3,399 $13,598 $15,637
$18,061 $18,964 $20,908
Turf Coordinator (Recreation Soccer) $1,610 $6,442 $7,463
$8,590 $9,090 $9,951
Turf Coordinator (Lacrosse) $428 $1,710 $2,367 $2,733 $2,870
$3,164
Turf Coordinator (Football) $786 $3,143 $3,614 $4,174 $4,383
$4,832
Turf Coordinator (Baseball/Softball) $1,121 $4,483 $5,155
$5,955 $6,252 $6,893
Adventure Area Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Birthday Party Management $810 $3,240 $3,726 $4,304 $4,519
$4,982
Corporate Events Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Concessions Manager $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal Program Management Payroll $10,817 $43,270
$50,215 $57,969 $60,938 $67,113
Fitness Membership Attendant and Sales Staff $3,415 $40,977
$32,149 $33,630 $34,735 $35,877
Traveling Soccer Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Recreational Soccer Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Basketball Staff $407 $4,884 $5,617 $6,488 $6,812 $7,510
Volleyball Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Court Events Staff $91 $1,094 $1,259 $1,454 $1,526 $1,683
Lacrosse Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Football Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Baseball/Softball Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Rock Wall Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Birthday Party Staff $360 $4,320 $2,208 $2,429 $2,550 $2,678
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 45
Indoor Concession Staff $1,266 $15,194 $15,953 $16,751
$17,589 $18,468
Summer Camp & Kidz Squad Staff $10,682 $128,185 $132,031
$135,991 $140,071 $144,273
Child Watch Room Staff $438 $5,250 $5,408 $5,570 $5,737
$5,909
Maintenance Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal Program Staff Payroll $16,659 $199,904 $194,624
$202,313 $209,020 $216,398
Fitness Membership Class Fitness Instructors (Free)
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Performance Fitness Trainers/Class Instructors
$40,400 $28,060 $32,409 $34,030 $37,518
Traveling Soccer Camp/Clinic Instructor
$1,969 $2,264 $2,615 $2,746 $3,027
Recreation Soccer Camp/Clinic Instructor
$4,904 $5,777 $6,599 $7,106 $7,657
Lacrosse Camp/Clinic Instructor
$1,500 $1,725 $1,992 $2,092 $2,306
Football Camp/Clinic Instructor
$656 $755 $872 $915 $1,009
Baseball Soccer Camp/Clinic Instructor
$7,225 $8,309 $9,597 $10,076 $11,109
Basketball Instructors
$2,569 $2,954 $3,412 $3,583 $3,950
Basketball Academy Instructors
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Volleyball Instructors
$3,000 $3,450 $3,985 $4,184 $4,613
Volleyball Academy Instructors
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Climbing Instructors
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Group Events Instructors
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal Instructors (COGS) $0 $21,823 $25,234 $29,071
$30,702 $33,671
Traveling Soccer Referees
$18,585 $21,373 $24,686 $25,920 $28,577
Recreation Soccer Referees
$6,720 $14,026 $16,203 $17,174 $18,828
Lacrosse Referees
$2,000 $3,100 $3,581 $3,760 $4,145
Football Referees
$5,760 $6,624 $7,651 $8,033 $8,857
Basketball Officials
$18,202 $20,932 $24,177 $25,386 $27,988
Volleyball Officials
$4,240 $4,876 $5,632 $5,913 $6,519
Court Tournament Officials
$2,400 $2,760 $3,188 $3,347 $3,690
Subtotal Referee/Officials (COGS) $0 $57,907 $73,691 $85,116
$89,533 $98,604
Payroll Subtotal $177,126 $745,504 $774,816 $814,142
$838,659 $873,222
% of Revenue 47% 43% 39% 39% 37%
Health Insurance/Benefits $7,150 $6,600 $6,930 $7,277 $7,640
$8,022
IMRF $19,455 $59,164 $60,347 $61,554 $62,785 $64,041
Bonus Pool $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Payroll Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Payroll Taxes (FICA) $13,550 $50,932 $51,706 $53,547
$54,959 $56,682
Payroll Taxes/Benefits/Bonus Totals $40,155 $116,696
$118,983 $122,377 $125,385 $128,746
Total Payroll $217,281 $862,199 $893,799 $936,519 $964,044
$1,001,968
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 46
Facility and Operating Expenses
The following tables represent the expenses for the facility and
the operations:
Expense Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
General Expenses
204-Dues & Subscriptions $1,000 $1,020 $1,040 $1,061 $1,082
205-Education & Training (Management) $5,000 $5,100 $5,202
$5,306 $5,412
206-Education & Training (Staff) $1,000 $1,020 $1,040 $1,061
$1,082
209-Printing $6,000 $6,120 $6,242 $6,367 $6,495
210-Advertising $8,000 $8,160 $8,323 $8,490 $8,659
211-Postage $500 $510 $520 $531 $541
212-Transportation $500 $510 $520 $531 $541
218-Contractual Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
221-Utilities - Gas $30,612 $31,224 $31,848 $32,485 $33,135
222-Utilities - Electric $76,529 $78,059 $79,621 $81,213
$82,837
223-Utilities - Phone $10,000 $10,200 $10,404 $10,612 $10,824
224-Utilities - Water & Sewer $6,888 $7,025 $7,166 $7,309
$7,455
225-Utilities - Disposal $3,000 $3,060 $3,121 $3,184 $3,247
230- Internet Expense $2,000 $2,040 $2,081 $2,122 $2,165
231-Marketing Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
232-Uniforms (Staff) $500 $510 $520 $531 $541
233-Legal $1,000 $1,020 $1,040 $1,061 $1,082
243-Fire Protection $1,035 $1,056 $1,077 $1,098 $1,120
248-Maintenance Agreements $9,000 $9,180 $9,364 $9,551
$9,742
252-Software Maintenance $7,000 $7,140 $7,283 $7,428 $7,577
253-Computer Services $5,000 $5,100 $5,202 $5,306 $5,412
254-Security Services $2,000 $2,040 $2,081 $2,122 $2,165
257-Credit Card Expenses $23,988 $24,468 $24,957 $25,456
$25,965
258-Internet Registration Fees $6,000 $6,120 $6,242 $6,367
$6,495
272-Prof/Community Relations $500 $510 $520 $531 $541
Commodities
303-First Aid $1,000 $1,020 $1,040 $1,061 $1,082
311-Office Supplies $10,000 $10,200 $10,404 $10,612 $10,824
314-Photo ID Supplies $2,000 $2,040 $2,081 $2,122 $2,165
321-Equipment & Supplies $8,000 $8,160 $8,323 $8,490 $8,659
331-Janitorial Supplies $3,000 $3,060 $3,121 $3,184 $3,247
Repairs & Maintenance
424-Maintenance Repairs $15,306 $15,612 $15,924 $16,243
$16,567
434-Equipment & Supplies $10,000 $10,200 $10,404 $10,612
$10,824
436-Grounds Maintenance $5,000 $5,100 $5,202 $5,306 $5,412
Capital Outlay
801-New Equipment $5,000 $5,100 $5,202 $5,306 $5,412
811-Technology $5,000 $5,100 $5,202 $5,306 $5,412
Capital Replacement Program
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 47
CRP Sinking Fund Transfer $50,000 $51,000 $52,020 $53,060
$54,122
Audit Services
Audit Services $2,500 $2,550 $2,601 $2,653 $2,706
Insurance
Property $3,400 $3,468 $3,537 $3,608 $3,680
Liability & Pollution $3,600 $3,672 $3,745 $3,820 $3,897
EPLI Rate $1,200 $1,224 $1,248 $1,273 $1,299
Workers Compensation (Other Payroll) $4,000 $4,154 $4,312
$4,430 $4,577
Workers Compensation (Maint. Payroll) $3,900 $3,967 $4,046
$4,127 $4,210
Total Facility Expense $339,956 $346,819 $353,830 $360,939
$368,215
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 48
Conclusion
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 49
CONCLUSION & PROFESSIONAL RECOMMENDATION
To assess the likelihood of success for a multisport and
multipurpose sports and recreation
facility in Woodridge, the Park District for the Woodridge
Athletic Recreation Center project
contracted The Sports Facilities Advisory (SFA) to analyze the
feasibility and financial viability
for the project. The basis for the project is to serve the
Woodridge community by developing a
first-class sports, recreation, and training facility with an
emphasis on court sports, turf sports,
fitness, and events. Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will
provide sports and recreation
opportunities for all ages with an emphasis on families
including youth programming and
development, adult programs, as well as family participation
and community involvement.
This feasibility analysis and the associated financial projections
encompasses market research
(demographics, sports participation, existing providers, etc.)
specific to this project and this
region. Additionally, this analysis details financial projections
and recommendations for
operational success.
What follows are the professional conclusions, findings, and
recommendations for the
Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center project:
Contributors to Project Success
For the Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center project, several
positive factors can be found, and
these “Contributors to Project Success” are listed below:
Site and Location: Both sites are in an established recreational
area and supported by
the city. In the case of the TIF Site, the facility could benefit
from a $5 million TIF to
decrease land acquisition, site work, and building expenses and
would be able to share
parking and resources with an existing Parks and Rec field
space to the north. In the case
of the Orchard Site, the land would be granted to the project –
decreasing land and site
work costs by roughly $2.4 million – and the facility would be
erected next to an
aquatics center that has existing parking and creates a naturally
beneficial adjacency and
a synergetic use of space based on seasonality.
Market and Demographics: Situated in a community with an
ideal demographic
makeup, the local market can support a facility of this type and
size. Despite the heavy
volume of existing providers, Woodridge Athletic Recreation
Center will be able to capture
a large enough percentage of the market to sustain itself and
grow into the future. The
income and spending trends in this local area are outstanding,
and such demographics
bode well for a sports facility when it comes to programming
mix and pricing. Chicago
has a very strong sports market and it is expected that this
facility can capitalize on
interest and participation as soon as the doors open.
Construction Costs: With a projected $12-$14 million in
available funding and an
additional $5 million TIF, the outlined construction cost of
$16,886,441 is in line with
budget.
Park District track record: The management of the Woodridge
Park District currently
operates successful programming and has a foundation of an
active customer base. The
track record for delivering quality service to an already
established customer base gives
any new facility or operation a head start in marketing new
services.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 50
Challenges to Project Success
As is the case with many start-up endeavors, there are many
obstacles to overcome along the
path to creating and maintaining a sports facility that is
economically viable and financially
sustainable. SFA has outlined these “Challenges to Project
Success” below:
Financing: After discussing the financing of this project in more
detail and based on our
expertise in planning and developing facilities – along with our
vast experience in Chicago – we
feel comfortable that the $17,000,000 in secured funding will be
sufficient to build the facility
regardless of the site. However, receiving the $5 million TIF
from the city would change the
entire scope of operations and the speed at which the facility
can expect to become sustainable
assuming an appropriately minimal level of debt service is
owed.
Land and Layout: In total, the facility footprint is 4.74 acres.
The TIF site is 4 acres and
the Orchard Site is 4.5 acres; given the fact that both locations
offer shared parking, any
adjustments to the plan should be minor but may still be
necessary.
Existing Providers: Although the market and the opportunity
make this a viable facility,
there is a high density of existing providers. Both immediate
and long-term success is
dependent on a strong opening, which will require a significant
amount of work on the
part of the founding group and management. A detailed pre-
opening plan with
measurable goals and targets must be developed to ensure that
Woodridge Athletic
Recreation Center opens with the momentum it needs to be
sustainable.
Conclusion, Recommendations & Next Steps
In identifying the positive contributors to success as well as
acknowledging the existing
challenges listed above, SFA believes this is a very viable
project and, under the correct
financing and development terms, SFA, as previously stated,
formally endorses the project and
deems it to be a “Feasibility: Yes.” The financials, cash flow,
and operational metrics all meet
SFA qualifications and are typical for a start-up indoor sports
facility. For next steps, SFA
recommends the following:
1. Floor Plan: SFA recommends creating a detailed floor plan
that can be helpful in better
analyzing the spaces of the facility and can be used by general
contractors for budgetary
construction pricing. The floor plan will also be used for
investor and financing
marketing material.
2. Obtain Building Cost Estimates: To further hone in on budget
numbers – and possibly
lower construction costs – SFA recommends reaching out to one
or more general
contractors to get more specific quotes on true building and site
costs. We have seen
contractors recently get aggressive, especially in Chicago, so
any reduction of
construction budgets will improve the financial numbers and
lower the amount of
outside equity needed.
3. TIF Acquisition Strategy: Because the TIF is not guaranteed,
SFA recommends
additional marketing material such as investment information
sheets, community
information packets, funding presentations, etc.
4. Facility Development Timeline: A comprehensive
development timeline including the
short term steps mentioned above as part of a more detailed,
longterm, and strategic
perspective is important to the developmental success of the
facility. The timeline
should include critical design, entitlement, construction,
development, marketing,
branding, staffing, and operational milestones. The milestones
should be accompanied
by anticipated completion dates so that it serves as a roadmap
going forward. SFA
suggests utilizing this as a “living document” so that it is
adjusted and modified as the
development process moves forward.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 51
If steps are taken to address the issues listed above, SFA
suggests that this could be a successful
facility and viable business model in Woodridge. If the Park
District should determine that any
such subsequent work is needed beyond this financial forecast
and feasibility study, SFA can
provide any such materials and support.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 52
APPENDIX
See Supporting Documents under separate cover.
Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
Woodridge, IL
April 2012
The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
Page 53
You will watch the video and then answer the questions that
follows. Make sure you provide will written and well thought
out responses. This assignment is worth 2 field observation
hour.
Please watch the videos that goes allow with this assignment
and give well thought out answers.
For this assignment, you will complete the Module by reviewing
content under the Challenge, Initial Thoughts, Perspectives and
Resources, and Wrap it up. You will complete the provide
questions afterwards. Be sure to answer incomplete sentences,
references information from the module and not use your
personal opinion.
https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/at/#content (Links to
an external site.) Click or copy and paste the module link .
Assistive Technology: An Overview
Assessment
Take some time now to answer the following questions. Please
note that the IRIS Center does not collect your Assessment
responses. If this is a course assignment, you should turn them
in to your professor using whatever method he or she requires.
If you have trouble answering any of the questions, go back and
review the Perspectives & Resources pages in this module.
1. Name at least three items that could be considered AT and
describe how those devices could support a student with a
disability in the classroom.
2. Explain two reasons why it is necessary to consider AT for
students with disabilities.
3. Why is it important to consider both AT devices and
services?
4. Describe three responsibilities of the Implementation Team.
5. List three outcomes the Implementation Team can determine
by evaluating a student’s assistive technology.
6. Imagine you are a seventh-grade general education language
arts teacher and a student in your class has an upcoming IEP
meeting. What types of information should you gather ahead of
time to contribute to the discussion of the student’s AT needs?
Name at least four.
7. During the meeting suggested in the example above, the IEP
team recommends AT for the student. As a general education
teacher, describe your role in the AT implementation and
evaluation processes.
Early Childhood Behavior Management: Teaching and
Reinforcing Rules
Est. Time: 30 Minutes (including watching videos)
The contents of this resource were developed under a grant from
the U.S. Department of Education, #H325E120002. However,
those contents do not necessarily represent
the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should
not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project
Officers, Sarah Allen and Tracie Dickson.
Early Childhood Behavior Management: Teaching and
Reinforcing Rules
Est. Time: 30 Minutes (including watching videos)
Objective
Understand the importance of teaching and reinforcing rules
with young children, including
those with disabilities, in early childhood environments.
DEC Recommended Practices
This Activity addresses the DEC Recommended Practices (DEC
RP) topic areas outlined
below:
Environment
E1. Practitioners provide services and supports in natural and
inclusive environments during
daily routines and activities to promote the child’s access to and
participation in learning
experiences.
Instruction
INS4. Practitioners plan for and provide the level of support,
accommodations, and adaptations
needed for the child to access, participate, and learn within and
across activities and routines.
INS5. Practitioners embed instruction within and across
routines, activities, and environments
to provide contextually relevant learning opportunities.
Overview
Just as early childhood educators or providers use systema tic
instruction when they teach
letters, numbers, shapes, and colors, so too should they teach
classroom rules in a systematic
way. Doing so means not only teaching the rules but also
providing opportunities to practice
them and reinforcing children for following them throughout the
day. Early childhood educators
or providers should also be prepared to support children in
learning, maintaining, and
generalizing the behaviors expected of them. In addition, some
children who have disabilities
might need individualized supports—known as
accommodations—in order to learn, practice,
and follow the rules. For example, a two-year-old who is deaf
and just learning American
Sign Language (ASL) might not yet have the ASL skills
necessary to understand a teacher’s
directions. Visual cues, such as a picture of a child sitting on a
carpet square at circle time, can
be paired with the sign language directions to help this young
child learn the rules.
Activity
Watch the three YouTube videos from the Pyramid Model
Consortium below and be prepared
to discuss the questions that follow. In the videos, the children
review the STAR Classroom
rules:
n1http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu 052915
THE
IRIS
CENTER
Early Childhood Behavior Management: Teaching and
Reinforcing Rules
Est. Time: 30 Minutes (including watching videos)
◦ Stay safe
◦ Take turns
◦ Always clean up our mess
◦ Respectful of our friends
Video 1: The STAR Classroom Rules (:33 sec)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWLpG3EaHX0
Video 2: Teaching Rules in Context video (1:02 min)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YUXZQ9FlB8
n2http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu 052915
THE
IRIS
CENTER
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWLpG3EaHX0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YUXZQ9FlB8
Early Childhood Behavior Management: Teaching and
Reinforcing Rules
Est. Time: 30 Minutes (including watching videos)
Video 3: STAR Family Song (1:13 min)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvxW9gtQ_ww
Questions/Discussion Topics
Video 1
1. In the first video, the teacher is teaching/reviewing the STAR
classroom rules. When
following DEC Recommended Practices (DEC RP) teachers
provide support during
naturally occurring daily routines and activities to promote the
child’s learning. Teachers
embed instruction within these routines. Following are some
opportune times when
teachers might review rules with young children:
• When children arrive in the morning
• During a large-group circle time
• When a teacher expects a child to have difficulty following
expectations or rules
• When a child isn’t following the rules
a. Which of these was the teacher taking advantage of in the
video?
b. Why do you think it is beneficial to review rules during these
times?
c. During what other times might teachers review the rules?
d. Imagine that this teacher has a child in her class who has a
language delay. With a
partner, brainstorm some possible accommodations the teacher
might make to help
this child learn, practice, and follow the rules.
n3http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu 052915
THE
IRIS
CENTER
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvxW9gtQ_ww
Early Childhood Behavior Management: Teaching and
Reinforcing Rules
Est. Time: 30 Minutes (including watching videos)
Video 2
2. The second video highlights a teacher teaching rules in
context. The DEC RP states that
teachers embed instruction within the naturally occurring
Feasibility Study Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center
Feasibility Study Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center
Feasibility Study Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center
Feasibility Study Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center
Feasibility Study Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center
Feasibility Study Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center
Feasibility Study Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center
Feasibility Study Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center

More Related Content

Similar to Feasibility Study Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center

Assess the health care needs of a selected community by completi.docx
Assess the health care needs of a selected community by completi.docxAssess the health care needs of a selected community by completi.docx
Assess the health care needs of a selected community by completi.docx
galerussel59292
 
Profile.Services
Profile.ServicesProfile.Services
Profile.Services
varma84
 
AthelticScholarshipsDirectExecutiveSummary
AthelticScholarshipsDirectExecutiveSummaryAthelticScholarshipsDirectExecutiveSummary
AthelticScholarshipsDirectExecutiveSummary
mapirolo59
 
Visitor Center Analysis - JAN 2015 - GD
Visitor Center Analysis - JAN 2015 - GDVisitor Center Analysis - JAN 2015 - GD
Visitor Center Analysis - JAN 2015 - GD
George Dusenbury
 
ACEC-Shift Your Paradigm Webinar - 21-MAY-2015m-rev1
ACEC-Shift Your Paradigm Webinar - 21-MAY-2015m-rev1ACEC-Shift Your Paradigm Webinar - 21-MAY-2015m-rev1
ACEC-Shift Your Paradigm Webinar - 21-MAY-2015m-rev1
Gregory Beckstrom
 
Ameriholdings LakePoint Brochure FINAL 3.2.15 hi-res READER
Ameriholdings LakePoint Brochure FINAL 3.2.15 hi-res READERAmeriholdings LakePoint Brochure FINAL 3.2.15 hi-res READER
Ameriholdings LakePoint Brochure FINAL 3.2.15 hi-res READER
Michael Woyan
 

Similar to Feasibility Study Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center (20)

Corporate Naming Rights and Sponsorship - Conference 2009 (B1)
Corporate Naming Rights and Sponsorship - Conference 2009 (B1)Corporate Naming Rights and Sponsorship - Conference 2009 (B1)
Corporate Naming Rights and Sponsorship - Conference 2009 (B1)
 
Assess the health care needs of a selected community by completi.docx
Assess the health care needs of a selected community by completi.docxAssess the health care needs of a selected community by completi.docx
Assess the health care needs of a selected community by completi.docx
 
B&C Master Land Use Plan JAN 2003
B&C Master Land Use Plan JAN 2003B&C Master Land Use Plan JAN 2003
B&C Master Land Use Plan JAN 2003
 
Profile.Services
Profile.ServicesProfile.Services
Profile.Services
 
PM 101 Team 6
PM 101 Team 6PM 101 Team 6
PM 101 Team 6
 
B&C Land Development Plans JAN 2003
B&C Land Development Plans JAN 2003B&C Land Development Plans JAN 2003
B&C Land Development Plans JAN 2003
 
AthelticScholarshipsDirectExecutiveSummary
AthelticScholarshipsDirectExecutiveSummaryAthelticScholarshipsDirectExecutiveSummary
AthelticScholarshipsDirectExecutiveSummary
 
SpreadOffense.com - Business Plan 2009
SpreadOffense.com - Business Plan 2009SpreadOffense.com - Business Plan 2009
SpreadOffense.com - Business Plan 2009
 
Visitor Center Analysis - JAN 2015 - GD
Visitor Center Analysis - JAN 2015 - GDVisitor Center Analysis - JAN 2015 - GD
Visitor Center Analysis - JAN 2015 - GD
 
Responsible Conduct of International Research
Responsible Conduct of International ResearchResponsible Conduct of International Research
Responsible Conduct of International Research
 
2012-2016 Town of Dyer Indiana Parks and Recreation master plan
2012-2016 Town of Dyer Indiana Parks and Recreation master plan2012-2016 Town of Dyer Indiana Parks and Recreation master plan
2012-2016 Town of Dyer Indiana Parks and Recreation master plan
 
Chula Vista Bayfront Development Opportunity Marketing Brochure
Chula Vista Bayfront Development Opportunity Marketing BrochureChula Vista Bayfront Development Opportunity Marketing Brochure
Chula Vista Bayfront Development Opportunity Marketing Brochure
 
Usaid guide to grantand contract process
Usaid guide to grantand contract processUsaid guide to grantand contract process
Usaid guide to grantand contract process
 
USP Sport Matters - Keynote (Sherry)
USP Sport Matters - Keynote (Sherry)USP Sport Matters - Keynote (Sherry)
USP Sport Matters - Keynote (Sherry)
 
Niosh extramural research and training program
Niosh extramural research and training programNiosh extramural research and training program
Niosh extramural research and training program
 
Public policy really matters doss
Public policy really matters   dossPublic policy really matters   doss
Public policy really matters doss
 
ACEC-Shift Your Paradigm Webinar - 21-MAY-2015m-rev1
ACEC-Shift Your Paradigm Webinar - 21-MAY-2015m-rev1ACEC-Shift Your Paradigm Webinar - 21-MAY-2015m-rev1
ACEC-Shift Your Paradigm Webinar - 21-MAY-2015m-rev1
 
Ameriholdings LakePoint Brochure FINAL 3.2.15 hi-res READER
Ameriholdings LakePoint Brochure FINAL 3.2.15 hi-res READERAmeriholdings LakePoint Brochure FINAL 3.2.15 hi-res READER
Ameriholdings LakePoint Brochure FINAL 3.2.15 hi-res READER
 
Mastery journey timeline
Mastery journey timelineMastery journey timeline
Mastery journey timeline
 
Mastery journey timeline
Mastery journey timelineMastery journey timeline
Mastery journey timeline
 

More from ChereCheek752

Please read first because this Assignment is for correction.Plea.docx
Please read first because this Assignment is for correction.Plea.docxPlease read first because this Assignment is for correction.Plea.docx
Please read first because this Assignment is for correction.Plea.docx
ChereCheek752
 
Please read below, and write esaay.I need 3 pages.Overvi.docx
Please read below, and write esaay.I need 3 pages.Overvi.docxPlease read below, and write esaay.I need 3 pages.Overvi.docx
Please read below, and write esaay.I need 3 pages.Overvi.docx
ChereCheek752
 
Please note that the following vignettes represent samples of the ty.docx
Please note that the following vignettes represent samples of the ty.docxPlease note that the following vignettes represent samples of the ty.docx
Please note that the following vignettes represent samples of the ty.docx
ChereCheek752
 
Please no plagiarism. I have attached an example to go by. The popul.docx
Please no plagiarism. I have attached an example to go by. The popul.docxPlease no plagiarism. I have attached an example to go by. The popul.docx
Please no plagiarism. I have attached an example to go by. The popul.docx
ChereCheek752
 
Please Paraphrase the following into a more scholarly toneI f.docx
Please Paraphrase the following into a more scholarly toneI f.docxPlease Paraphrase the following into a more scholarly toneI f.docx
Please Paraphrase the following into a more scholarly toneI f.docx
ChereCheek752
 
Please no plagiarism and make sure you are able to access all resour.docx
Please no plagiarism and make sure you are able to access all resour.docxPlease no plagiarism and make sure you are able to access all resour.docx
Please no plagiarism and make sure you are able to access all resour.docx
ChereCheek752
 

More from ChereCheek752 (20)

please read the attached file cearfully before telling me you can do.docx
please read the attached file cearfully before telling me you can do.docxplease read the attached file cearfully before telling me you can do.docx
please read the attached file cearfully before telling me you can do.docx
 
please read my post carefully.then place handshakei have the wor.docx
please read my post carefully.then place handshakei have the wor.docxplease read my post carefully.then place handshakei have the wor.docx
please read my post carefully.then place handshakei have the wor.docx
 
Please read the attachment.Please write a pure Essay Paper. Plea.docx
Please read the attachment.Please write a pure Essay Paper. Plea.docxPlease read the attachment.Please write a pure Essay Paper. Plea.docx
Please read the attachment.Please write a pure Essay Paper. Plea.docx
 
Please read first because this Assignment is for correction.Plea.docx
Please read first because this Assignment is for correction.Plea.docxPlease read first because this Assignment is for correction.Plea.docx
Please read first because this Assignment is for correction.Plea.docx
 
Please read below, and write esaay.I need 3 pages.Overvi.docx
Please read below, and write esaay.I need 3 pages.Overvi.docxPlease read below, and write esaay.I need 3 pages.Overvi.docx
Please read below, and write esaay.I need 3 pages.Overvi.docx
 
Please Read Before RespondingI need assistance with a .docx
Please Read Before RespondingI need assistance with a .docxPlease Read Before RespondingI need assistance with a .docx
Please Read Before RespondingI need assistance with a .docx
 
Please provide response to the below post. Topic #1) You are an .docx
Please provide response to the below post. Topic #1) You are an .docxPlease provide response to the below post. Topic #1) You are an .docx
Please provide response to the below post. Topic #1) You are an .docx
 
Please provide an annotation for the two articles attached AND ide.docx
Please provide an annotation for the two articles attached AND ide.docxPlease provide an annotation for the two articles attached AND ide.docx
Please provide an annotation for the two articles attached AND ide.docx
 
Please provide a statement that addresses your reasons for transferr.docx
Please provide a statement that addresses your reasons for transferr.docxPlease provide a statement that addresses your reasons for transferr.docx
Please provide a statement that addresses your reasons for transferr.docx
 
Please provide a brief response to the following questions1) How .docx
Please provide a brief response to the following questions1) How .docxPlease provide a brief response to the following questions1) How .docx
Please provide a brief response to the following questions1) How .docx
 
PLEASE NOTE OF SOURCESMATERIALS ALSO INCLUDED---USE THEMT.docx
PLEASE NOTE OF SOURCESMATERIALS ALSO INCLUDED---USE THEMT.docxPLEASE NOTE OF SOURCESMATERIALS ALSO INCLUDED---USE THEMT.docx
PLEASE NOTE OF SOURCESMATERIALS ALSO INCLUDED---USE THEMT.docx
 
Please note that the following vignettes represent samples of the ty.docx
Please note that the following vignettes represent samples of the ty.docxPlease note that the following vignettes represent samples of the ty.docx
Please note that the following vignettes represent samples of the ty.docx
 
Please no plagiarism. I have attached an example to go by. The popul.docx
Please no plagiarism. I have attached an example to go by. The popul.docxPlease no plagiarism. I have attached an example to go by. The popul.docx
Please no plagiarism. I have attached an example to go by. The popul.docx
 
PLEASE NO PLAGIARIZE!! Have 10 hours to fullfil this work. 1page or .docx
PLEASE NO PLAGIARIZE!! Have 10 hours to fullfil this work. 1page or .docxPLEASE NO PLAGIARIZE!! Have 10 hours to fullfil this work. 1page or .docx
PLEASE NO PLAGIARIZE!! Have 10 hours to fullfil this work. 1page or .docx
 
Please Paraphrase the following into a more scholarly toneI f.docx
Please Paraphrase the following into a more scholarly toneI f.docxPlease Paraphrase the following into a more scholarly toneI f.docx
Please Paraphrase the following into a more scholarly toneI f.docx
 
Please only respond if you are familiar with raspberry piIam loo.docx
Please only respond if you are familiar with raspberry piIam loo.docxPlease only respond if you are familiar with raspberry piIam loo.docx
Please only respond if you are familiar with raspberry piIam loo.docx
 
Please note this is 2 ASSIGNMENTS ......Please only orginial work on.docx
Please note this is 2 ASSIGNMENTS ......Please only orginial work on.docxPlease note this is 2 ASSIGNMENTS ......Please only orginial work on.docx
Please note this is 2 ASSIGNMENTS ......Please only orginial work on.docx
 
PLEASE NEED TWO RESPONSES TWO HUNDRED WORDS EACHDistinguish b.docx
PLEASE NEED TWO RESPONSES TWO HUNDRED WORDS EACHDistinguish b.docxPLEASE NEED TWO RESPONSES TWO HUNDRED WORDS EACHDistinguish b.docx
PLEASE NEED TWO RESPONSES TWO HUNDRED WORDS EACHDistinguish b.docx
 
Please no plagiarism and make sure you are able to access all resour.docx
Please no plagiarism and make sure you are able to access all resour.docxPlease no plagiarism and make sure you are able to access all resour.docx
Please no plagiarism and make sure you are able to access all resour.docx
 
Please need two posts of 200 words each. Discuss the ways in whi.docx
Please need two posts of 200 words each. Discuss the ways in whi.docxPlease need two posts of 200 words each. Discuss the ways in whi.docx
Please need two posts of 200 words each. Discuss the ways in whi.docx
 

Recently uploaded

Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
negromaestrong
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Chris Hunter
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
 
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptxRole Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
 
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
psychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docxpsychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docx
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 

Feasibility Study Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center

  • 1. Feasibility Study Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center Woodridge (IL) Park District This document details the vision, the business model, current status, expected needs, defined markets, and projected results of the Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center project, as well as the projected feasibility for the success and financial viability of the project. This study represents a formal statement of the business goals and the reasons why they are believed attainable, in addition to background information about the Park District and its assembled advisory board. April 2012 Prepared For: Woodridge Park District Prepared by: The Sports Facilities Advisory
  • 2. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... ............................................ 5 PROJECT INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLGY ............................................................................................... ....... 7 Project Background ............................................................................................... ................ 7 Planning and Strategy ............................................................................................... ........... 8 Final Facility Design - Option 7 ....................................................................................... 11
  • 3. Site Options ............................................................................................... ........................... 11 Financial Forecasting ............................................................................................... ........... 14 PROGRAMMING AND PRODUCTS/SERVICES ............................................................................................... ........ 15 Projected Revenue of Products and Services .................................................................. 16 MARKET ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... ..........19 FACILITY LOCATION & SITE ACCESSIBILITY ............................................................................................... ........ 20 MARKET DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................................................... ....... 21 EXISTING PROVIDER ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... ............................ 24 Existing Turf Providers................................................................................. ...................... 30 Existing Court Providers ............................................................................................... ..... 32
  • 4. Existing Baseball and Softball Training Providers ...................................................... 33 Existing YMCA and Rec Centers ....................................................................................... 34 Existing Fitness Providers ............................................................................................... .. 35 Summary of Existing Service Providers .......................................................................... 37 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... .....39 SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS ............................................................................................... .............. 40 Programming Revenues & Expenses ................................................................................ 40 Payroll ............................................................................................... .................................... 43 Facility and Operating Expenses ...................................................................................... 46 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................... ......................48
  • 5. CONCLUSION & PROFESSIONAL RECOMMENDATION ........................................................................................ 49 Contributors to Project Success ........................................................................................ 49 Challenges to Project Success ........................................................................................... 50 Conclusion, Recommendations & Next Steps ................................................................ 50 APPENDIX ............................................................................................... .............................52 Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 3 Project Planning & Development Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL
  • 6. April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 4 THE SPORTS FACILITIES ADVISORY PROFILE The Sports Facilities Advisory The Park District engaged The Sports Facilities Advisory (SFA) to contribute third-party financial and feasibility analysis and expertise for this indoor sports and recreation facility. Operated by a team of accomplished sports facility operators, business advisors, league sports experts, corporate team development professionals, and facility design professionals; SFA is a full-service consultancy firm specializing in the planning, opening, and managing of sports and recreation facilities of all sizes and scope. SFA assists clients in evaluating opportunities, developing new sport and recreation facilities – from community centers to professional-level training and competition facilities – and managing or optimizing existing operations. SFA’s work encompasses multisport and multipurpose centers, performance training facilities, health/fitness centers, aquatic facilities, and outdoor complexes. Having served a portfolio of projects totaling more than $2 billion in planned and operational facilities, SFA is called upon to
  • 7. assist sports tourism destinations, private developers, parks and recreation departments and other national/state/local government entities, and architect and engineering firms. SFA also offers design-build and general contractor services, architectural consultations, and bid procurement. Through our network of vendors, SFA has also secured serious discounts for purchases of turf, hardwood, lighting, dasher boards, and other sports-specific elements. SFA facilities provide programming for various sports and activities, such as soccer, lacrosse, football, basketball, volleyball, baseball, softball, hockey, performance training, health/fitness, golf, aquatics, and many more. Since its inception in 2003, the SFA team has consulted on more than 60 operational sport, recreation, and youth leadership centers across the country. SFA has also completed more than 100 financial forecasts and feasibility analyses for projects across the U.S. and internationally. SFA is conservative in its market research and feasibility projections. More than 70% of the projects analyzed by SFA result in a “Feasibility: No” or require significant changes to the original business model, financing structure, or facility design. Additional information can be found at www.sportadvisory.com. http://www.sportadvisory.com/ Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
  • 8. Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Sports Facilities Advisory (SFA) – with expertise in developing program plans, business plans, financial forecasts and feasibility analyses, as well as consulting, operational management, and design – has developed a third-party feasibility study and financial analysis for the development of an indoor, multi-sport community and recreation facility in Woodridge, Illinois surrounding area. Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will be situated in the community of Woodridge in the Chicago land market. The Woodridge Park District contracted SFA to analyze the feasibility and financial viability for the project. SFA developed and analyzed seven unique facility models for Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center. The seventh (and recommended) model is a 76,529 square foot facility that features a turf field, a hardwood basketball court, three volleyball courts, six batting cages, a child watch area, a café, and multi-purpose rooms, as well as fitness areas that include weight training, cardio equipment, aerobics, and an elevated track. The center w ill be
  • 9. equipped to host fitness, youth and adult recreational sports, competitive sports, tournaments, events, parties, performance training, and more. The projected cost of construction is $15MM, not including land and site work. Land and site work costs depend on which of two locations the facility is built. SFA evaluated both sites to determine whether they have the capacity to house the facility. Site 1, called the “TIF Site,” is a 4-acre parcel of land located directly south of outdoor fields already in use for park programs. The TIF Site may be eligible for up to $5 million in TIF subsidies. If it is chosen and the subsidies are granted in full, SFA estimates the total cost of the project to be $13.3MM. Site 2, called the “Orchard Site,” is a 4.5-acre plot already owned by the park system and adjacent to a community aquatics center. Woodridge Park District already owns the land, drastically reducing initial costs, but the site is not in a TIF district, eliminating the possibility of the $5 million in aforementioned subsidies. If the Orchard Site is selected, SFA estimates the total cost of the project would be $15.8MM. The market surrounding Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center has over 1,500,000 people within a 30-minute drive time and features a median household income of $75,552, which is nearly $26,000 or 52% higher than the national average. Sports participation rates in the area are high relative to national averages, and – as should be expected – there are a significant number of existing providers in the market. Each of those factors was
  • 10. weighed as the recommended facility model above was developed. The data was also incorporated into SFA’s proprietary formulas as the financial forecast (pro forma) was developed, which is detailed in the body of this study. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 6 Based on SFA’s proven system of planning, managing, and projecting facility utilization, Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center is slated to generate $1.6MM in total revenue its first year and expand to $2.33MM in total revenue in year five. The total cost of goods sold and operating expenses in those respective years is $1.5MM and $1.77MM, meaning that total net is projected to be just under $100,000 in Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center’s first year and over $550,000 in its fifth year. It should be noted that those figures reflect earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). Because the site has
  • 11. not been selected, it is impossible to project year-end cash flow, but EBITDA as a percent of revenue (6% in Year 1 and 24% in Year 5) is within the range that signifies a viable model. After careful consideration and comprehensive analysis of the business model, program plan, financials, and the Park District’s vision for the Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center, the project has been deemed by SFA to be a “Feasibility: Yes.” Please note that this finding is based on EBITDA projections. Furthermore, the finding is predicated on minimal and an appropriate level of debt service so that the cash flow is not hamstrung by excessive principal and interest payments. SFA is conservative in its market analyses, financial forecasts, and feasibility projections, with more than 70% of the projects analyzed by SFA resulting in either a “Feasibility: No” or requiring significant changes to the original business model, financing structure, or facility design. Because of the comprehensive and collaborative approach during the planning, strategy, and feasibility analysis stages – including the exhaustive analysis of numerous potential models – the Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center project stands out as an example of a “Feasibility: Yes.” Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total Revenue 1,599,191.61$ 1,782,660.83$ 2,062,563.87$
  • 12. 2,159,254.42$ 2,333,548.86$ Total Cost of Goods Sold 623,783.00$ 652,021.54$ 732,267.70$ 765,982.95$ 821,738.84$ Total Operating Expenses 879,252.17$ 896,853.92$ 915,880.49$ 934,790.17$ 954,396.87$ Total Expenses 1,503,035.17$ 1,548,875.45$ 1,648,148.19$ 1,700,773.12$ 1,776,135.71$ EBITDA 96,156.43$ 233,785.37$ 414,415.68$ 458,481.31$ 557,413.15$ % of Revenue 6% 13% 20% 21% 24% Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 7 PROJECT INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY This document represents the analysis and findings related to the development of Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center. The Park District secured the services of SFA to assist in the production of a comprehensive financial forecast and associated
  • 13. feasibility study. Through continual collaboration and information sharing between the Park District and consultant team, this document provides the narrative behind the financial analysis and underlying assumptions. Project Background On December 12, 2011, Mike Adams (Executive Director) and Don Ritter (Superintendent of Recreation/Deputy Director) of the Woodridge (IL) Park District met by phone with The Sports Facilities Advisory (SFA). This call was a follow -up to a presentation that SFA had completed during the 2011 Athletic Business Conference & Expo on Dec. 1. Mr. Adams attended this session and was interested in learning more about SFA’s capabilities to assist the Woodridge Park District with its recreation center planning process. Through that discussion, the following facts were identified: The Woodridge Park District (WPD) had completed a preliminary community needs assessment and determined that there is interest in a community recreation center. The WPD was interested in evaluating the financial realities for the construction and operation of a community recreation center. The WPD was interested in pursuing a model that can be financially self-sustaining. There was interest in evaluating the potential for the site to
  • 14. serve as a community destination; therefore, the site and final plan may include additional spaces for other local entities and/or retail space that could provide economic impact while working synergistically with the community recreation center. It was critical to the decision-making process that SFA’s study includes detailed financial forecasts. Vision Statement Woodridge ARC will establish itself in the community as the place to go for family recreation, indoor sports, and fun in Woodridge and the neighboring communities. The facility – which will function as a high-quality indoor sports complex but maintain the atmosphere of a local community center – will focus on providing a best-in-class playing environment as well as an unmatched experience for families, athletes and spectators. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012
  • 15. The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 8 Planning and Strategy To begin the analytical process, the two sides worked through several critical strategy issues in the development of the business model and the financial projections for Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center; more specifically: Preliminary demographic review and other market characteristics Product lines & services The business model Facility components & amenities Facility design considerations Site planning and land acquisition Projected start-up costs Community needs and desired impact Vision Major marketing strategies Developing Ideal Customer Relationships© (ICR)
  • 16. Local providers Staffing approaches Facility differentiators Funding strategy Construction & pre-opening timeline Potential strategic alliances Facility utilization This initial phase of work included discussions related to: Transforming existing ideas into a realistic plan Top reasons why facilities fail to meet forecasted revenues Top reasons why most developers fail to raise capital Estimating timelines for funding, construction/build-out, profitability, etc. Keys to successful facility ownership What’s involved in raising capital for a new facility Identifying and strengthening resources
  • 17. in preparation for financing presentations Maximizing revenue per square foot Current trends in facility financing (common loan terms, rates, equity) and involvement in the daily operations Typical management and organizational structures And much more SFA then completed more in-depth market research to arrive at detailed pricing, team projections and seasonality for the various sports, market demand, and market reach. From there, SFA created and analyzed a total of seven different business and operating models to find the best fit for the market. Based on this extensive research, SFA arrived at its recommended model, which provided for highest and best use and highest returns. The chart on the next page and the narrative that follows outlines models 1-6. Each of these models provided discussion points and insights that contributed to the creation of model 7, designated as the “final facility design.” Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦
  • 18. Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 9 Models 1-6 Comparison Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6 Fitness, 2 Court Gym, Turf Fitness, 1 Court Gym, Turf Fitness, 2 Court Gym, No Turf Fitness, 2 Court Gym, Synthetic Fitness, 1 Court Gym, Synthetic Fitness, 1 Court Gym, No Turf 88,188 sf 75,969 sf 61,188 sf 73,406 sf 61,188 sf 48,969 sf C o n
  • 19. s tr u ct io n & S ta rt -U p C o st Land + Site work $2,900,000 $2,900,000 $2,900,000 $2,900,000 $2,900,000 $2,900,000 Hard Cost (bldg. only) $12,988,563 $11,192,406 $9,019,563 $10,815,719 $9,019,563 $7,223,406 Field/Sport Equipment $1,013,555 $877,000 $915,577 $998,969 $862,414 $779,023 FF&E $277,830 $277,830 $277,830 $277,830 $277,830
  • 20. $277,830 Soft Cost $1,802,281 $1,639,205 $1,441,929 $1,600,150 $1,437,074 $1,278,853 Total $18,982,228 $16,886,441 $14,554,898 $16,592,667 $14,496,880 $12,459,111 Total (minus land & site work) $16,082,228 $13,986,441 $11,654,898 $13,692,667 $11,596,880 $9,559,111 Year One Revenue $1,808,580 $1,796,850 $1,507,410 $1,582,041 $1,570,311 $1,469,985 Expense $1,615,079 $1,577,665 $1,435,895 $1,495,447 $1,458,033 $1,422,296 EBITDA $193,500 $219,184 $71,514 $86,594 $112,278 $47,689 Year Two Revenue $2,027,112 $2,014,283 $1,685,285 $1,768,786 $1,755,957 $1,635,762 Expense $1,714,834 $1,676,280 $1,527,674 $1,586,978 $1,548,425 $1,510,126 EBITDA $312,279 $338,002 $157,611 $181,808 $207,532 $125,636
  • 21. Year Three Revenue $2,341,198 $2,327,727 $1,956,433 $2,047,412 $2,033,941 $1,893,510 Expense $1,847,483 $1,807,919 $1,642,813 $1,705,275 $1,665,710 $1,619,764 EBITDA $493,715 $519,809 $313,620 $342,137 $368,231 $273,746 Year Four Revenue $2,453,914 $2,439,769 $2,053,444 $2,146,751 $2,132,606 $1,985,842 Expense $1,917,096 $1,876,488 $1,704,522 $1,768,568 $1,727,959 $1,679,447 EBITDA $536,817 $563,281 $348,922 $378,183 $404,647 $306,395 Year Five Revenue $2,645,390 $2,630,538 $2,209,225 $2,310,334 $2,295,482 $2,130,667 Expense $2,015,103 $1,973,417 $1,787,835 $1,855,284 $1,813,598 $1,758,332 EBITDA $630,287 $657,122 $421,389 $455,049 $481,884 $372,335 Cumulative (5 Year)
  • 22. Revenue $11,276,194 $11,209,167 $9,411,796 $9,855,324 $9,788,296 $9,115,765 Expense $9,109,595 $8,911,769 $8,098,740 $8,411,552 $8,213,726 $7,989,964 EBITDA $2,166,599 $2,297,398 $1,313,056 $1,443,771 $1,574,570 $1,125,801 11.4% 13.6% 9.0% 8.7% 10.9% 9.0% The chart above shows the five-year operations summary for each of the first six models developed. The following descriptions highlight the differences in the models, the thought process behind the adaptations, the effect on usage, and the resulting profitability. Note that for each of the models the land and site work fee was been subtracted, thus eliminating variables caused by location and allowing for the most meaningful contrast of the facilities themselves. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 10
  • 23. Option 1 was the first model developed. It features two basketball courts (each lined for cross- court play on two smaller courts, which is how the majority of youth programming would be run), an unboarded turf field (which allows for maximum flexibility to segment the field into multiple areas, thus accommodating several activities at once and allowing for multiple sports to run simultaneously), and a fitness center. This model is the largest and grandest of the options, but SFA’s in-depth analysis predicted that the court space would be underutilized for the entirety of years 1-5 based on participation rates. Overbuilt courts add cost to both construction and ongoing utilities without significantly increasing revenue, affecting the profitability and yielding a 5-year EBITDA ROI of 11.4%. Option 2 mirrors Option 1 but eliminates one basketball court (and thus two smaller cross- courts). This shift significantly decreases square footage, construction costs, and operating costs, increases the utilization percentages, and only marginally decreases revenue from tournaments/events. The result is a 5-year EBITDA ROI of 13.6%. Option 3 keeps the two-court model developed in Option 1 and the fitness center while eliminating the turf component. The advantage of this model is that it results in the smallest footprint of any of the options, thus decreasing start-up and construction costs, operating costs, and management costs. That said, the courts would still be underutilized, the revenue streams would decrease significantly over Option 1 and Option 2
  • 24. (because the turf component would be highly utilized), and the overall service to the community would suffer. The 5-year EBITDA ROI is 9.0%, which signifies a low return on a relatively small investment. Option 4 adds a court-sized synthetic floor to Option 3. Synthetic court is more suitable for field sports than hardwood courts, but sacrifices a significant amount of playability offered by turf. The result is a footprint close to that of Option 2 and a mix of activities similar to Option 1, but the savings on building size, operating costs, and field/sport equipment are offset by the decreased draw of synthetic flooring as opposed to turf. The hardwood courts would remain underutilized and revenue on synthetic court is relatively low, resulting in a 5-year EBITDA ROI of 8.7%, the lowest of all of the models. Option 5 presents the next logical iteration: a facility with a single court, a single synthetic court, and a fitness center. The footprint is the same as Option 3 (again requiring low start-up and construction costs, operating costs, and management costs), but the underutilized court is replaced with the more versatile synthetic flooring. This option provides flexibility and adaptability at a low price, but the return remains at a relatively modest 10.9% Option 6 scales down as much as possible, eliminating the multi-sport component all together and paring down to one hardwood court and a fitness center. This option has by far the smallest footprint and construction costs, but also limits the ability to
  • 25. serve a broad spectrum of the community and returns only 9.0% of the investment over 5 years. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 11 Final Facility Design - Option 7 After an in-depth analysis and multiple discussions revolving around models 1-6, a seventh and final model was designed. It is a derivative of “Option 2”, which was the most efficient model analyzed in providing a diverse program offering while responding to the market needs of the surrounding Woodridge market place. For this model, Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center’s indoor facility is recommended to include one unboarded turf field flanked by a basketball court overlaid with three volleyball courts. The turf area is designed to accommodate not only traditional field sports such as soccer, football, and lacrosse, but also field hockey and baseball/softball training. More details on the facility design are as follows: Basketball court space (115’ x 85’)
  • 26. o 2 cross-court functionality Volleyball courts (three at 60’ x 30’ over the above court space) Unboarded turf field (180’ x 120’) o 3 cross-field functionality Batting cages/pitching tunnels (six at 75’ x 15’ over the turf field) Fitness/Strength Room (100’ x 75’) Aerobic Rooms (two at 40’ x 30’) Fitness Locker Rooms (two at 30’ x 30’) Elevated Jogging Track (860’ x 10’) Child Watch Room (30’ x 30’) Lobby/Welcome Area (30’ x 30’) Café and Seating Area (40’ x 40’) Multipurpose Rooms (two at 32’ x 32’, divisible) Staff Offices (four at 15’ x 15’) General Office (30’ x 30’) Outsource Space/CRC Classroom & Computer Lab (two at 30’ x 30’)
  • 27. Restrooms (three at 20’ x 20’) Parking (estimated 230 spaces) o 3 per 1000sf of building Site Options Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will sit on one of two sites. Site 1, called “TIF Site” for identification purposes, is a 4-acre parcel of land located on the northeast corner of North Janes Ave and 83rd St directly south of outdoor fields already in use for park programs. There is efficient street access and if necessary, future expansion is possible on the north side of the building. The site’s proximity to the fields allows for shared parking and enhanced services for residents, but the land is privately owned and will need to negotiate a reasonable purchase price. The city has expressed an initial willingness to provide a TIF subsidy of $5 million. While formal design has not yet begun and with it, a site plan not yet designed, SFA has analyzed the feasibility of a 4-acre site for the 7 models described. Figure 1 is a conceptual site diagram Figure 1: Conceptual site lay-out for the “TIF Site” located at North
  • 28. Janes Ave and 83 rd St. Building is denoted in red and parking in grey. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 12 demonstrating how the building footprint and parking could work. While the site is “tight,” it can accommodate the building footprint and necessary parking. Site 2, called “Orchard Site” for identification purposes, is located on the east side of North Jane Ave. just south of the 83rd St intersection. It is a 4.5-acre plot already owned by the park system with southern adjacency to a community aquatics center, also allowing for some shared parking and a maximization of space due to each facility’s seasonality. Expansion would be possible to the west. The fact that the land is already owned by the Park District eliminates the acquisition cost, but the site is not located in a TIF district, making none of the $5 million
  • 29. TIF subsidies available. As an additional note, the facility and additional parking would be developed over existing fields that are currently in use by the park district for outdoor programming, so that space would likely need to be relocated. The cost for replacement of those existing fields is not factored into the financial analysis; however, those costs are real and should be considered in site selection. The table on the following page demonstrates a comparison of the two sites utilizing the Model 7 (Final Facility Program Design) financial forecast. Figure 2: Conceptual site lay-out for the “Orchard Site” located on the east side of North Janes Ave south of the 83 rd St intersection. Building is denoted in red and parking in grey. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 13
  • 30. Based on the financial analysis, SFA recommends pursuing the TIF site given the following factors: - The seller of the site is reasonable and is willing to sell the site at market rate. - The TIF subsidies are provided to aid in the development of the facility. - The site is “tight” and the design of the building and parking can be accommodated on the site as analyzed by SFA. This is predicated on a functional plan for storm water retention and the development authorities providing any necessary variances and adjustments to ordinances that will permit the development at this location. TIF Site Orchard Site Fitness, 1 Court Gym, Turf Fitness, 1 Court Gym, Turf 76528.75 76528.75 Land + Sitework $3,200,000 $800,000 Hard Cost (building only) $12,093,278 $12,093,278 Field/Sport Equipment $1,087,137 $1,087,137 FF&E $351,750 $351,750
  • 31. Soft Cost $1,497,754 $1,497,754 Sub Total $18,229,920 $15,829,920 TIF Land/Site Subsidy (TBD) ($3,200,000) $0 TIF Bldg. Subsidy (TBD) ($1,800,000) $0 PARC Grant ($2,500,000) $0 $0 Total $13,229,920 $15,829,920 Revenue $1,599,192 $1,599,192 Expense $1,503,035 $1,503,035 EBITDA $96,156 $96,156 Revenue $1,782,661 $1,782,661 Expense $1,548,875 $1,548,875 EBITDA $233,785 $233,785 Revenue $2,062,564 $2,062,564 Expense $1,648,148 $1,648,148 EBITDA $414,416 $414,416 Revenue $2,159,254 $2,159,254 Expense $1,700,773 $1,700,773 EBITDA $458,481 $458,481
  • 32. Revenue $2,333,549 $2,333,549 Expense $1,776,136 $1,776,136 EBITDA $557,413 $557,413 Revenue $9,937,220 $9,937,220 Expense $8,176,968 $8,176,968 EBITDA $1,760,252 $1,760,252 Total Development ROI 9.7% 11.1% Cash on Cash ROI 13.3% 11.1% Year Four Year Five Cumulative (5 Year) C o n s tr u c ti o
  • 33. n & S ta rt -U p C o s t Model 7 Comparison Year One Year Two Year Three Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 14
  • 34. Financial Forecasting Upon being retained, SFA reviewed the Park District’s existing model, structure, and study for the Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center project. SFA then proceeded to complete its own comprehensive analysis of the market, existing providers, and opportunities. The forecasts for each model and the subsequent recommendations were reached through an application of SFA’s standard methodology for financial analysis and projections, which have been successfully implemented and proven accurate in the development of sports complexes across the nation. The Park District reviewed SFA’s final analysis and confirmed that it is realistic and attainable; the result of the effort is a mutually approved, thorough financial forecast with supporting documentation to assess the feasibility of the project. The Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center business model will feature a product/service mix focused on leagues, tournaments, camps, clinics, and instruction/training in sports such as soccer, football, lacrosse, baseball, softball, basketball, and volleyball. Complementing the sports and training programs, Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will also offer plenty of school-age programming and birthday parties. By combining these elements at one site, it is the desire of the Park District to create a hub of activity for the local area and region and to provide a full family experience that promotes player development, competition, involvement, entertainment, and participation. Also, Woodridge Athletic
  • 35. Recreation Center will provide an atmosphere of fun, healthy living, excitement, and a desire to return season after season and year after year. The keys to success for Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center include the Park District’s ability to drive traffic into the facility, create an unmatched atmosphere and facility that serves as a popular destination and gathering spot, and effectively deliver the variety of unique services being considered. The Park District also has established and is further building relationships within the local and regional sports community; this will attract current programs and leagues and aid in the creation of new and exciting programs that will benefit athletes and participants of all ages and abilities. It should be noted that the Park District is not a new operator in the area, and it currently serves the residents with programming. For that reason, it already has a head start in communication, pubic relations, marketing, and a track record with its customer base. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 15
  • 36. PROGRAMMING AND PRODUCTS/SERVICES Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will be designed as a “hub” for sports programming, player development, training, and community recreation. As such, the Park District acknowledges the necessity for a diverse mix of products/services and the implementation of various programs and other offerings throughout the indoor facility. By providing these various program spaces and amenities, Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will offer multiple athletic and recreational activities to serve a wide range of user and community pursuits. The facility will be designed as a cross-marketing engine to increase revenue and develop Ideal Customer Relationships©. Below is a list of the various programs/revenue streams and product and service offerings to be included in the first year of operation and beyond: Soccer o Instructional Clinics & Camps o Drop-in Play o Tournaments o Leagues o Traveling Soccer Basketball o Instructional Clinics & Camps o Drop-in Play o Tournaments
  • 37. o Leagues Lacrosse o Instructional Clinics & Camps o Drop-in Play o Tournaments o Leagues Football o Instructional Clinics & Camps o Drop-in Play o Tournaments o Leagues Baseball/Softball o Instructional Clinics & Camps o Private Lessons o Team Rentals o Cage Rentals o Drop-in Play Volleyball o Instructional Clinics & Camps o Drop-in Play o Leagues Fitness & Training o Personal Training o Group Training Classes o Group Exercise Classes Membership o Program Memberships o Day Guest Passes Court and Field Rentals
  • 38. o Full-Court/Field Rentals o Half-Field Rentals Birthday Parties o Turf Sport Parties o Baseball Parties o General/Non-Sport Parties Corporate & Group Events o Corporate Events and Parties o Large Events and Parties o Facility Rentals Youth Programming o Full-Day and Half-day Camps o Single-day Camps o Teen Programs o Camp Daycare o Lock-ins o Before and After School Programs o Field Trips Food & Beverage o Concessions o Vending Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
  • 39. Page 16 Projected Revenue of Products and Services The following table illustrates the revenue (and percentage of revenue) that each product/service lends to the overall bottom line. The specific revenue and expense projections can be found in the financial analysis section of this study and in the accompanying detailed pro-forma. The “Projected Revenue of Products and Services” table demonstrates the diversified revenue base for Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center and how the various contributions increase and are distributed over the first five years of operations. It is important to note that some secondary revenue-generating opportunities (i.e. seasonal offerings per market demand) have not been included. $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % Fitness Memberships $510,972 32% $540,026 30% $623,730 30% $654,916 30% $687,662 29% $176,690 35% Basketball $61,055 4% $70,213 4% $81,096 4% $85,151 4% $93,879 4% $32,824 54% Volleyball $34,550 2% $39,733 2% $45,891 2% $48,186 2% $53,125 2% $18,575 54% Court Events (Tournaments) $21,888 1% $25,171 1% $29,073 1% $30,526 1% $33,655 1% $11,767 54%
  • 40. Court Rentals $45,000 3% $49,500 3% $54,574 3% $54,574 3% $57,302 2% $12,302 27% Competitive and Travel Soccer $135,975 9% $156,371 9% $180,609 9% $189,639 9% $209,077 9% $73,102 54% Recreational/Child Development Soccer$64,416 4% $74,629 4% $85,900 4% $90,904 4% $99,512 4% $35,096 54% Lacrosse $17,100 1% $23,665 1% $27,333 1% $28,700 1% $31,641 1% $14,541 85% Football $31,425 2% $36,139 2% $41,740 2% $43,827 2% $48,320 2% $16,895 54% Baseball/Softball $44,830 3% $51,555 3% $59,545 3% $62,523 3% $68,931 3% $24,101 54% Field Rental $76,500 5% $84,150 5% $88,358 4% $88,358 4% $92,775 4% $16,275 21% Birthday Parties $32,400 2% $37,260 2% $43,035 2% $45,187 2% $49,819 2% $17,419 54% Performance Fitness & Training $80,800 5% $92,920 5% $107,323 5% $112,689 5% $124,239 5% $43,439 54% Corporate & Group Events $23,000 1% $26,450 1% $32,005 2% $33,605 2% $37,049 2% $14,049 61% Youth Programming $346,351 22% $398,304 22% $481,947 23% $506,045 23% $557,914 24% $211,563 61% Food & Beverage $72,930 5% $76,577 4% $80,405 4% $84,426 4% $88,647 4% $15,717 22%
  • 41. Total Revenue $1,599,192 100% $1,782,661 100% $2,062,564 100% $2,159,254 100% $2,333,549 100% $734,357 46% ∆ Growth Yr. 1 to Yr. 5Projected Revenue of Products and Services Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 17 Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 18
  • 42. THE MANAGEMENT TEAM The Management Team consists of the Board of Park Commissioners, whose primary responsibility is to set policy and oversee all financial obligations of the proposed facility. The Board is supported by the existing Administrative Staff consisting of the Executive Director, Deputy Director/Superintendent of Recreation, Superintendent of Finance and Personnel, Superintendent of Park Operations and the Assistant Superintendent of Recreation; whose primary responsibilities are to develop and administer financial, administrative, personnel and operations procedures in compliance with the policies established by the Park Board. Facility Management staff responsible for the day to day operations will consist of a Facility Supervisor, Recreation Supervisor, Athletic Supervisor, Fitness Manager, and Maintenance Supervisor. The Management Team will report to the Park Board, as currently reported for other District facilities, on all aspects relative to the overall operational and financial performance of the facility. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL
  • 43. April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 19 Market Analysis Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 20 FACILITY LOCATION & SITE ACCESSIBILITY A suburb of Chicago, located primarily in DuPage County, Woodridge is located in northeastern Illinois about 30 miles southwest of downtown Chicago (see shaded area to the right). Market Accessibility Both the TIF Site and Orchard Site are located near 83rd Street between North Janes Avenue and the Veteran’s Memorial Tollway (TIF Site is north of 83rd, Orchard Site is south). Both locations are on/next to already-in-use Parks and Rec pieces of land, making the facility
  • 44. a natural fit in a known and established area. Either site will allow the facility and the Park District to draw players and patrons from the local area and region for training, leagues, tournaments, and other instructional programs such as camps and clinics. Such market penetration is critical to facility utilization and sustainability. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6a/Illinois_- _outline_map.svg Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 21 MARKET DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS Depending on the business model, different parameters are applied when analyzing a market (demographics, participation, existing providers, etc.). For a sports and recreation facility located in a densely populated region such as the Chicago market, industry metrics
  • 45. dictate that a 30-minute drive time area would serve as the “target market” from which to capture facility participants and patrons for regular league, tournament, and training programs. It is this 30- minute demarcation that is employed when analyzing the test facility (Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center) against existing service providers in the area and market reach for specific programming such as soccer, lacrosse, baseball, softball, basketball, volleyball, etc. The map above depicts Woodridge ARC surrounded by 10-, 15-, and 30-minute drivetimes. The map illustrates population by zip code, with the darker colors representing the denser areas. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 22 The map above depicts Woodridge ARC surrounded by 10-, 15-, and 30-minute drivetimes. The map illustrates median household income by zip code, with the darker colors representing the
  • 46. higher income areas. Demographic data provided by Demographics Now. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 23 Key Demographics As the table to the right demonstrates, Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center is located in a heavily populated area. What stands out about the demographic factors is that the target market surrounding Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center is stable, young, and affluent. The surrounding area is expected to remain highly populated without having to accommodate for the influx of people seen in many markets; the median age in each of the drive time circumferences analyzed is in line with the U.S. average; and the median household income is significantly higher than the national average. Potential Sports Participation
  • 47. To project the number of teams Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center can expect to capture from the current market, SFA utilized local participation rates reported by American Sports Data, Inc. (ASD), the National Sporting Goods Association (NSGA), and the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association (SGMA). These reports take into account only active sports participants who play their respective sport in an organized format a set amount of times per year. Sports Participation - 30-minute Drivetime Sport Registered Participant % Potential Participants Baseball 5.1% 79,024 Basketball 12.7% 199,126 Football 5.1% 79,416 Soccer 5.3% 82,937 Softball 7.9% 123,622
  • 48. Volleyball 4.3% 66,506 Futsal 2.4% 37,165 Lacrosse 1.1% 17,213 * Note: existing providers are not factored into this “pool” of participants. The “potential participants” are the number of individuals that the facility and the management team could target for the respective activities. The actual participants would result from a closing percentage of these “potential participants.” Key Demographic Factors Category 10 minutes 15 minutes 30 minutes Total Population (2011 Estimate) 89,902 222,932 1,564,840 Total Population (2016 Projection)
  • 49. 89,345 221,730 1,564,448 Expected Pop. Change (2011-2016) -0.6% -0.5% 0.0% Median Age (U.S. = 36.95) 37.7 37.2 36 Median HH Income (U.S. = $49,726) $75,667 $76,529 $75,552 Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 24 • EXISTING PROVIDER ANALYSIS As can be expected in a market of this size with such favorable key demographic factors, there
  • 50. are a significant number of existing providers in the area. In order to determine the share of the market that Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center can expect to capture, SFA performed an in- depth analysis of the local providers. That analysis is based on the following factors: • Proximity to existing providers • Sports and Programs offered relative to existing providers • Other services offered • Pricing advantages • Facility quality, aesthetics, and amenities • Existing providers within the desired demographic Based on an indoor turf, court, and fitness model, Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center must consider five primary categories of similar providers: 1) Existing Turf Providers; 2) Existing Court Providers; 3) Existing BB/SB Training Providers; 4) Existing Fitness Providers; and 5) Existing YMCA/Rec Centers. A provider map for each of those categories can be found on the pages that follow. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 25
  • 51. Woodridge ARC Drive time (30 mins) Turf 1. Ditka’s Sports Dome 2. Seven Bridges Ice Arena 3. Darien Sportsplex 4. Westmont Yard Indoor Sports 5. Bo Jackson Elite Sports 6. Ackerman SFC (Glen Ellyn) 7. Players Indoor Sports Center 8. The Max 9. Bridgeview Sports Dome 10. Sport Zone Family Fun Center 11. Just for Kicks 12. Elite Sports Performance 13. PlayUSA Indoor 14. ChiTown Futbol 15. Finish Strong Indoor Sportsplex 16. Chicago Sports Zone 17. Sportsplex St Charles Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 26
  • 52. Woodridge ARC Drive time (30 mins) Court 1. Bulls/Sox Training Academy 2. Sunsetters Volleyball 3. Walker Athletics 4. Ackerman Sports & Fitness Center 5. Players Indoor Sports Center 6. The Max 7. Wheaton Park CAC 8. Illinois Basketball Academy 9. Great Lakes Volleyball Center 10. Sugar Grove Sports Center Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 27 Woodridge ARC Drive time (30 mins) Baseball/Softball Training 1. Perfect Swing 2. Bulls/Sox Training Academy 3. Quarry Fieldhouse
  • 53. 4. Bo Jackson Elite Sports 5. Ackerman Sports & Fitness 6. The Max 7. Bridgeview Sports Dome 8. Naperville Baseball Academy 9. Centerfield Sports Academy 10. Elite Sports Performance 11. Finish Strong Indoor Sportsplex Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 28 Woodridge ARC Drive time (15 mins) Fitness 1. Curves 2. LA Fitness 3. Blast Fitness 4. Women’s Workout World 5. X Sport Fitness 6. Edward Health & Fitness 7. Curves 8. Cardinal Fitness 9. Walker Athletics 10. Midtown Athletic Club
  • 54. 11. Good Samaritan Hospital HWC 12. ATI Fitness Center 13. Lifetime Fitness 14. Five Seasons Family Sports Club 15. Edward Health & Fitness- Naperville 16. Anytime Fitness 17. Lifetime Fitness 18. LifeStart Central Park Athletic Club 19. Curves Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 29 Woodridge ARC Drive time (30 mins) YMCA 1. Indian Boundary YMCA (Downers Grove) 2. Kroeler Family YMCA (Naperville) 3. YMCA Sports Complex Recreation Centers 1. Darien Park District Fitness Center
  • 55. 2. Bolingbrook Annerino Comm. Center 3. Lemont Park District CORE 4. Lisle Community Park Fitness Center 5. Downers Grove Park District Rec Center 6. Bolingbrook Park District RAC 7. Ackerman SPC (Glen Ellyn) Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 30 EXISTING TURF PROVIDERS Ditka's Sports Dome (www.ditkasportsdome.com) Located approximately 4 minutes away in Bolingbrook, Ditka’s Sports Dome features a 70,000 square foot dome with an unboarded turf field and a 44 station, 2-deck driving range. Seven Bridges Ice Arena (www.sevenbridgesicearena.com ) Located approximately 6 minutes away in Woodridge, Seven Bridges Ice Arena features two ice sheets and one small unboarded turf field used for programs including Lil’ Kickers.
  • 56. Darien Sportsplex (www.dariensportsplex.com) Located approximately 10 minutes away in Darien, Darien Sportsplex features three ice sheets and a 185’ x 85’' turf field. The facility is owned by the park district. Westmont Yard Indoor Sports (www.westmontyard.com) Located approximately 12 minutes away in Westmont, Westmont Yard Indoor Sports features a 270’ x 180’ field that divides into three 180’ x 90’ fields and is used for a variety of indoor sports. Bo Jackson’s Elite Sports (www.bojacksonselitesports.com) Located approximately 19 minutes away in Lockport, Bo Jackson’s Elite Sports features two major league-size infields with adjustable base paths, a multipurpose field measuring 110’ x 195’, a three-lane 80-yard track, state of the art agility and speed training area, and 12 batting cages with professional clay mounds. The facility also has a team store, concessions, and rehab clinic. Ackerman Sports & Fitness Center (www.ackermansportsandfitnesscenter.com) Located approximately 22 minutes away in Glen Ellyn, Ackerman Sports & Fitness Center is an 88,000 square foot multi-purpose facility, including a 180’ x 120’ multi-purpose turf field, three high school-size wood basketball courts, two 30-foot climbing rocks, batting cages, an elevated, multi-lane walking/running/jogging track, a 7,000 SF fitness center, multipurpose rooms for fitness classes, locker rooms, and meeting rooms. The facility is owned by the park district.
  • 57. Players Indoor Sports Center (www.playersindoor.com) Located approximately 22 minutes away in Naperville, Players Indoor Sports Center is a 95,000 SF facility featuring three 200’ x 100’' boarded fields, one unboarded 80’ x 50’ training field, and two volleyball courts. McCook Athletic & Expo (MAX) (www.max-mccook.com) Located approximately 22 minutes away in McCook, MAX is a 125,000 SF facility that features two full-sized basketball courts, volleyball courts, and a baseball/softball academy, and is headlined by a 408’ x 159’ full unboarded field that can be divided into four 159’ x 102’ pods. MAX is Chicago's first full-sized outdoor field under roof; it is positioned under a 40’ clear-span roof. Bridgeview Sports Dome (www.bridgeview-il.gov/dome/) Located approximately 24 minutes away in Bridgeview, Bridgeview Sports Dome is a 90,000 SF facility featuring a variety of sporting activities, plus free chipping and putting areas. The Dome can be reserved for indoor soccer, softball, baseball, whiffle ball, football practice or leagues, seminars, meetings and parties. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
  • 58. Page 31 Sport Zone Family Fun Center (www.sportzonepark.com) Located approximately 26 minutes away in Aurora, Sport Zone Family Fun Center is a dome structure featuring an unboarded field used for a variety of sports. Just for Kicks (www.justforkicks.org) Located approximately 27 minutes away in Plainfield, Just for Kicks is a 50,000 SF facility that features two 100’ x 200’ fields and two full-size outdoor fields behind the building. Elite Sports Performance (www.espcomplex.com) Located approximately 27 minutes away in Oswego, Elite Sports Performance features two unboarded 110’ x 65’' turf fields, seven baseball tunnels, and a sports performance training area. PlayUSA Indoor (www.playusasoccer.org) Located approximately 28 minutes away in Aurora, PlayUSA Indoor features a 90’' x 40’' field and a 188’' x 90’' field. Both are unboarded. ChiTown Futbol (www.chitownfutbol.com) Located approximately 30 minutes away in Chicago, ChiTown Futbol features two 171’ x 65’' and one 80’ x 50’' boarded turf field. Finish Strong Indoor Sportsplex (www.finishstrongsportsplex.com) Located approximately 31 minutes away in West Chicago, Finish Strong Indoor Sportsplex is a
  • 59. baseball training-focused facility with one 160’ x 75’ boarded turf field, one 95’ x 84’' open turf field used for baseball, drop down tunnels, and training areas. Soccer and lacrosse programs are also featured. Chicago Sports Zone (www.chicagosportszone.com) Located approximately 35 minutes away in Melrose Park, Chicago Sports Zone features two 185’ x 85’ boarded fields, a small fitness center, and a bar. SportsPlex St. Charles (www.sportsplexstc.net) Located approximately 46 minutes away in St. Charles, SportsPlex St. Charles is a 62,500 SF facility featuring two indoor soccer fields, locker rooms, showers, a soccer store, a concession stand, a sports performance center, and a dance studio. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 32 EXISTING COURT PROVIDERS Bulls Sox Training Academy (www.bullssoxacademy.com) Located approximately 9 minutes away in Lisle, Bulls Sox Training Academy is a 57,000 SF
  • 60. facility owned by the Chicago Bulls and Chicago White Sox and features three courts, baseball training with 13 tunnels, and a sports fitness center. Sunsetters Volleyball Facility (www.sunsettersvbc.org) Located approximately 11 minutes away in Woodridge, Sunsetters Volleyball Facility features four volleyball sport courts. Walker Athletics and Sports Performance Complex (www.walkerathletic.com) Located approximately 14 minutes away in Lisle, Walker Athletics and Sports Performance Complex is a 100,000 SF facility featuring four hardwood basketball courts and a 12,000 SF fitness center. Ackerman Sports & Fitness Center (www.ackermansportsandfitnesscenter.com) See above. Players Indoor Sports Center (www.playersindoor.com) See above. McCook Athletic & Expo (MAX) (www.max-mccook.com) See above. Wheaton Park Central Athletic Center (www.wheatonparkdistrict.com) Located approximately 23 minutes away in Wheaton, Wheaton Park Central Athletic Center features four hardwood basketball courts, three volleyball courts, two batting cages, and party rooms. Illinois Basketball Academy (www.ibahoops.com)
  • 61. Located approximately 24 minutes away in Naperville, Illinois Basketball Academy features four synthetic courts and competitive basketball programs. Great Lakes Volleyball Center (www.greatlakescenter.com) Located approximately 27 minutes away in Aurora, Great Lakes Volleyball Center is a 60,000 SF facility featuring eight volleyball courts, a training room, a weight training facility, a 10,000 SF mezzanine, and a team store. Sugar Grove Sports Center (www.sg-sports.com) Located approximately 41 minutes away in Sugar Grove, this facility features two-basketball courts and baseball training. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 33 EXISTING BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL TRAINING PROVIDERS Perfect Swing (www.perfectswingil.com) Located approximately 6 minutes away in Darien, Perfect Swing features a 38,000 SF training facility.
  • 62. Bulls Sox Training Academy (www.bullssoxacademy.com) See above. The Quarry Fieldhouse (www.quarryfieldhouse.com) Located approximately 15 minutes away in Romeoville, The Quarry Fieldhouse features a large open turf area for training and multiple baseball tunnels. Bo Jackson’s Elite Sports (www.bojacksonselitesports.com) See above. Ackerman Sports & Fitness Center (www.ackermansportsandfitnesscenter.com) See above. McCook Athletic & Expo (MAX) (www.max-mccook.com) See above. Bridgeview Sports Dome (www.bridgeview-il.gov) See above. Naperville Baseball Academy (www.5toolschool.com) Located approximately 24 minutes away in Naperville, Naperville Baseball Academy is a 7,200 SF facility featuring seven tunnels. Centerfield Sports Academy (www.centerfieldsportsacademy.com) Located approximately 24 minutes away in Naperville, Centerfield Sports Academy features three auto cages, four tunnels, four mound areas, and a 120’ x 50' infield space. Elite Sports Performance (www.espcomplex.com) See above.
  • 63. Finish Strong Indoor Sportsplex (www.finishstrongsportsplex.com) See above. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 34 EXISTING YMCA AND REC CENTERS Indian Boundary YMCA (www.ymcachicago.org/indianboundary) Located approximately 13 minutes away in Downers Grove, Indian Boundary YMCA features a fitness center, three courts, a walking track, a six-lane pool, a rock wall, and a skate park. Kroeler Family YMCA (www.ymcachicago.org/kroehler) Located approximately 17 minutes away in Naperville, Kroeler Family YMCA features a fitness center with classes, an indoor track, a gym, and aquatics. YMCA Sports Complex (www.ymcachicago.org/ysportscomplex) Located approximately 25 minutes away in Naperville, YMCA Sports Complex features five synthetic basketball courts, a walking track, and cardio and
  • 64. weight equipment. Darien Park District Fitness Center (www.darienparks.com/FitnessCenter.aspx) Located approximately 9 minutes away in Darien, Darien Park District Fitness Center features a 3,900 SF fitness center. Bolingbrook Annerino Community Center (www.bolingbrookparks.org) Located approximately 10 minutes away in Bolingbrook, Bolingbrook Annerino Community Center features a Lifestyles fitness center, a gymnastics a, dance, rock wall, and a preschool. Lemont Park District CORE Fitness & Aquatic Complex (www.lemontparks.org) Located approximately 10 minutes away in Lemont, Lemont Park District CORE Fitness & Aquatic Complex features a fitness center, indoor/outdoor pool, 21,000 SF three-court gym, an elevated track, and massage therapy. Lisle Community Park Fitness Center (www.lisleparkdistrict.org) Located approximately 12 minutes away in Lisle, Lisle Community Park Fitness Center features a fitness center, with cardio and classes. Downers Grove Park District Rec Center (www.dgparks.org/facilities/recreation-center.htm) Located approximately 13 minutes away in Downers Grove, Downers Grove Park District Rec Center is a 69,000 SF facility featuring a fitness center, 20,000 SF three-court gym, an elevated track, and a multi-purpose center.
  • 65. Bolingbrook Park District Recreation & Aquatic Complex (www.bolingbrookparks.org) Located approximately 14 minutes away in Bolingbrook, this complex features a fitness center with aerobic studios, indoor/outdoor aquatics, a 16,000 SF gym, and multipurpose rooms. Ackerman Sports & Fitness Center (www.ackermansportsandfitnesscenter.com) See above. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 35 EXISTING FITNESS PROVIDERS Curves (www.curves.com) Located approximately 4 minutes away in Darien, Curves features fitness for women only. LA Fitness (www.lafitness.com) Located approximately 4 minutes away in Bolingbrook, LA Fitness features fitness, a basketball court, classes, and an indoor pool.
  • 66. Blast Fitness (www.signup.myiclubonline.com) Located approximately 6 minutes away in Downers Grove, Blast Fitness features fitness for $10/month and fitness with classes and tanning for $20/month. Women's Workout World (www.w3body.com) Located approximately 7 minutes away in Downers Grove, Women's Workout World features fitness for women only. X Sport Fitness (www.xsportfitness.com) Located approximately 7 minutes away in Darien, X Sport Fitness features fitness, classes, a pro shop, and tanning for $20/month. Edward Health & Fitness (www.edward.org/fitness) Located approximately 8 minutes away in Woodridge, Edward Health & Fitness features fitness, an indoor track, courts, classes, a spa, aquatics, and retail. Curves (www.curves.com) Located approximately 12 minutes away in Westmont, Curves features fitness for women only. Cardinal Fitness (www.charterfitness.com) Located approximately 13 minutes away in Westmont, Cardinal Fitness features fitness for $10/month at a single location or $20/month at all locations. Walker Athletics and Sports Performance Complex (www.walkerathletic.com) See above. Midtown Athletic Club (www.midtown.com) Located approximately 15 minutes away in Willowbrook,
  • 67. Midtown Athletic Club features fitness, indoor tennis, an indoor track, one court, an indoor pool, a spa, and a pro shop. Good Samaritan Hospital Health and Wellness Center (www.advocatehealth.com) Located approximately 15 minutes away in Downers Grove, Good Samaritan Hospital Health and Wellness Center is a 90,000 SF fitness club with three indoor pools, an indoor track, a fitness and weight room, three group fitness rooms, and a basketball court. ATI Fitness Center (www.atipt.com) Located approximately 15 minutes away in Downers Grove, ATI Fitness Center features fitness and classes for $25/month. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 36 Lifetime Fitness (www.clubs.lifetimefitness.com) Located approximately 15 minutes away in Romeoville, Lifetime Fitness features fitness, classes, an indoor pool, an outdoor pool, a court, a rock wall,
  • 68. racquetball, and a spa. Five Seasons Family Sports Club (www.fiveseasonssportsclu.reachlocal.com) Located approximately 15 minutes away in Burr Ridge, Five Seasons Family Sports Club features fitness, indoor tennis, a spa, and a pool. Edward Health & Fitness (www.edward.org/fitness) Located approximately 16 minutes away in Naperville, Edward Health & Fitness features fitness, an indoor track, courts, classes, a spa, aquatics, and retail. Anytime Fitness (www.anytimefitness.com) Located approximately 16 minutes away in Naperville, Anytime Fitness features 24 hour fitness. Lifetime Fitness (www.clubs.lifetimefitness.com) Located approximately 16 minutes away in Burr Ridge, Lifetime Fitness features fitness, classes, an indoor pool, an outdoor pool, a court, a rock wall, racquetball, and a spa. LifeStart Central Park Athletic Club (www.lifestart.net) Located approximately 16 minutes away in Lisle, LifeStart Central Park Athletic Club features fitness, an indoor pool, classes, and a court. Curves (www.curves.com) Located approximately 17 minutes away in Naperville, Curves features fitness for women only.
  • 69. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 37 SUMMARY OF EXISTING SERVICE PROVIDERS Due to the broad scope of activities Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will offer its users, the facility encounters a significant number of existing providers in both the “immediate trade area,” defined as a 15-minute drive time, and the “local trade area,” defined as a 30-minute drive time. The 15-minute drive time is used to determine which existing providers will have the greatest impact on the operations of Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center due to the fact that they are, for all intents and purposes, neighbors. A 30-minute drive time is the industry standard “local trade area” for a sports facility, as patrons will typically drive approximately 1/3 of the time that they will actually spend at the facility. Given that the typical stay for a patron at a sports facility is 1 ½ hours (60 minutes for competition or training plus 15 minutes warm-up and 15 minutes post event or workout); this means that patrons will typically drive 30 minutes each way. The existing provider drive time circumference for fitness
  • 70. facilities is smaller. The industry standard for identifying existing providers is an 8-minute drive time, but SFA uses a 10- and a 15-minute range to achieve conservative, realistic estimates of market share. It is critical to understand that there is a significant difference between the quantity of existing providers and the quality of existing providers. Chicago land is a large, densely populated area, and it should come as no surprise that there are a wide range of existing providers in the realms of sports, recreation, and fitness. SFA’s practice is to identify every existing facility and to weigh each one based on quality. The result is an accurate determination of participation and market retention. In the court market, four of the existing providers are top-tier facilities: BullSox, Walker, IBA, and YMCA Sports Complex. These existing providers headline a list of 14 facilities with court programming (fitness providers with courts are not included), leaving a significant opening to draw basketball players from the local trade area. Based on participation rates and opportunity, Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center can expect to host 120 basketball teams and 36 volleyball teams in its first year, bringing in a majority of the $162,500 in forecasted court revenue. In the turf market, another four existing providers are top-tier facilities: Ackerman, Players Indoor, The Max, and ChiTown. These existing providers lead a group of 14 facilities, again leaving a large opportunity for Woodridge Athletic Recreation
  • 71. Center. Year one should see 167 soccer teams, 81 football teams, and 22 lacrosse teams enter the facility, contributing to $325,400 in forecasted turf revenue. Baseball and Softball training facilities exhibit the highest quality for traditional sports opportunities in the market, with four out of nine facilities qualifying as top-tier existing providers. Although Perfect Swing, BullSox, Bo Jackson’s Elite Sports, and Quarry Fieldhouse will all draw a significant amount of the market, the participation, interest, and spending rates in baseball/softball are high enough to forecast that teams, leagues, memberships, lessons, camps, and rentals will yield $44,800 in revenue. ● ● ● ‘Immediate’ Trade Area = 15 minutes ‘Local’ Trade Area = 30 minutes ● ● ● Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012
  • 72. The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 38 Fitness facilities in the 15-minute local trade area are both dense and high in quality. LA Fitness, Edward Health and Fitness, Walker, Midtown, Good Samaritan, Lifetime, and Five Seasons are all head-of-class, but Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will be able to capitalize on its key differentiators and unique positioning to generate over $590,000 worth of membership and fitness/training revenue in its first year. In summary, Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will benefit from the strong size of the market, density of the population, sizeable participation rates, and high income levels in the area. While there are a significant number of existing providers, there is room for a thoughtfully planned, well-managed facility to run a profitable operation with court, turf, and fitness components at the core of the business. In order to ensure that profitability, Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will need to focus on how it differentiates itself from existing providers. This can be accomplished through programming and amenities as well as the quality, cleanliness, and level of customer service. In order to protect and improve upon Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center’s initial market position, the experience at this facility must be superior to that of any existing providers in the area, as well as any future facilities. As Woodridge Athletic Recreation
  • 73. Center becomes successful, other entrepreneurs could begin to consider creating a similar facility, which would further increase the number providers in the market. The physical structure and products of the facility could be created with the appropriate resources. However, the experience within the walls will be the greatest barriers of entry for potential new providers. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 39 Financial Analysis Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 40 SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS
  • 74. Operational revenues were accounted for based on SFA’s proven metrics for calculating the number of individuals and teams within the facility’s radius of influence and the percentage of that market that Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will capture. Programming Revenues & Expenses The overall operating budget is generally a component of the overall service philosophy of the facility’s primary purpose. The following revenues and expenses are based on observations of comparable facilities, stakeholder interviews, market research, and industry leading practices utilizing proprietary forecasting formulas. To meet the following projections, SFA and the Park District recognize that the facility must: 1. Implement a mix of program elements that generate revenue, while attracting a wide range of age groups to accommodate the needs of families, children, teens, and adults, as well as varying levels of competition. The programming will be targeted to maximize youth sports and training activities during peak times and secondary markets (adults, seniors, corporations, etc.) during non-peak times. 2. Implement a marketing plan while leveraging the existing park district customer base that includes proper pricing points, operating hours, and an aggressive rollout and community outreach campaign, as well as continual brand development and industry
  • 75. leading tactics to attract users post opening. 3. Employ a strong leadership team, which can plan and meet the goals of the facility and take the right actions to attract users to the facility, sustain current members post- opening, increase members and revenue-generating events, and effectively manage the day-to-day operation. With success in each of those three areas, Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center can expect to achieve the revenue and expense projections outlined in the table below. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 41 Total Facility Revenue & Expenses Revenue Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Fitness Memberships $510,972 $540,026 $623,730 $654,916
  • 76. $687,662 Basketball $61,055 $70,213 $81,096 $85,151 $93,879 Volleyball $34,550 $39,733 $45,891 $48,186 $53,125 Court Events (Tournaments) $21,888 $25,171 $29,073 $30,526 $33,655 Court Rentals $45,000 $49,500 $54,574 $54,574 $57,302 Competitive and Travel Soccer $135,975 $156,371 $180,609 $189,639 $209,077 Recreational/Child Development Soccer $64,416 $74,629 $85,900 $90,904 $99,512 Lacrosse $17,100 $23,665 $27,333 $28,700 $31,641 Football $31,425 $36,139 $41,740 $43,827 $48,320 Baseball/Softball $44,830 $51,555 $59,545 $62,523 $68,931 Field Rental $76,500 $84,150 $88,358 $88,358 $92,775 Birthday Parties $32,400 $37,260 $43,035 $45,187 $49,819 Performance Fitness & Training $80,800 $92,920 $107,323 $112,689 $124,239 Rockwall $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Corporate & Group Events $23,000 $26,450 $32,005 $33,605 $37,049 Youth Programming $346,351 $398,304 $481,947 $506,045
  • 77. $557,914 Secondary Areas $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Food & Beverage $72,930 $76,577 $80,405 $84,426 $88,647 Total Revenue $1,599,192 $1,782,661 $2,062,564 $2,159,254 $2,333,549 Expenses Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Fitness Memberships $134,804 $125,109 $140,878 $147,344 $154,053 Basketball $38,465 $43,533 $50,165 $52,673 $57,945 Volleyball $14,299 $16,047 $18,481 $19,405 $21,335 Court Events (Tournaments) $8,425 $8,880 $10,065 $10,530 $11,450 Court Rentals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Competitive and Travel Soccer $45,129 $50,335 $58,131 $61,037 $67,286 Recreational/Child Development Soccer $28,527 $36,314 $41,636 $44,203 $48,095 Lacrosse $8,198 $10,751 $12,313 $12,928 $14,138 Football $13,181 $14,796 $17,020 $17,871 $19,625 Baseball/Softball $13,053 $14,495 $16,742 $17,579 $19,381
  • 78. Field Rental $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Birthday Parties $13,716 $13,013 $14,909 $15,654 $17,125 Performance Fitness & Training $50,096 $39,210 $45,288 $47,552 $52,427 Rockwall $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Corporate & Group Events $3,450 $3,692 $4,040 $4,194 $4,441 Youth Programming $209,290 $230,538 $255,028 $265,060 $281,987 Secondary Areas $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Food & Beverage $43,150 $45,308 $47,573 $49,952 $52,449 Total Cost of Goods Sold $623,783 $652,022 $732,268 $765,983 $821,739 Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 42 Gross Margin $975,409 $1,130,639 $1,330,296 $1,393,271 $1,511,810
  • 79. % of Revenue 61% 63% 64% 65% 65% Facility Expenses $339,956 $346,819 $353,830 $360,939 $368,215 Management Payroll $422,600 $431,052 $439,673 $448,467 $457,436 Payroll Taxes/Benefits/Bonus $116,696 $118,983 $122,377 $125,385 $128,746 Total Operating Expenses $879,252 $896,854 $915,880 $934,790 $954,397 EBITDA $96,156 $233,785 $414,416 $458,481 $557,413 % of Revenue 6% 13% 20% 21% 24% Total Net Income $96,156 $233,785 $414,416 $458,481 $557,413 As demonstrated, success in programming, marketing, and leadership will result in a sizeable return on investment for the operating company. Earnings before interest, tax, debt, and amortization are expected at 6% in year 1 and projected to balloon to 24% in year 5. The Park District will assume debt service for the capital improvement from existing funds. The debt service is excluded from the operational pro forma
  • 80. EBITDA (NOI) projections. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 43 Payroll The following table represents the estimated payroll structure required for the programming at Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center: Facility Management Payroll Summary Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Facility Supervisor (Director of Operations)(FT) $55,000 $56,100 $57,222 $58,366 $59,534 Asst. Facility Supervisors (2 - PT) $48,000 $48,960 $49,939 $50,938 $51,957 Athletic Supervisor (Program Director)(FT) $43,000 $43,860 $44,737 $45,632 $46,545 Recreation Supervisor @ 50% (Kids Squad/Camps)(FT) $21,840 $22,277 $22,722 $23,177 $23,640 Fitness Manager (FT) $40,000 $40,800 $41,616 $42,448
  • 81. $43,297 Marketing & PR Assistant $18,720 $19,094 $19,476 $19,866 $20,263 Facility Maintenance Supervisor (FT) $37,000 $37,740 $38,495 $39,265 $40,050 Maintenance (Grounds) @ 50% of Payroll (FT) $18,720 $19,094 $19,476 $19,866 $20,263 Maintenance Custodial l (2-PT) $33,280 $33,946 $34,625 $35,317 $36,023 Registration/Customer Service Representative (FT) $37,440 $38,189 $38,953 $39,732 $40,526 Registration/Customer Service Representative (PT) $38,400 $39,168 $39,951 $40,750 $41,565 Subtotal Facility Management $391,400 $399,228 $407,213 $415,357 $423,664 Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 44
  • 82. Total Payroll Summary Pre-Open Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Facility Supervisor (Director of Operations)(FT) $27,500 $55,000 $56,100 $57,222 $58,366 $59,534 Asst. Facility Supervisors (2 - PT) $24,000 $48,000 $48,960 $49,939 $50,938 $51,957 Athletic Supervisor (Program Director)(FT) $21,500 $43,000 $43,860 $44,737 $45,632 $46,545 Recreation Supervisor @ 50% (Kids Squad/Camps)(FT) $10,920 $21,840 $22,277 $22,722 $23,177 $23,640 Fitness Manager (FT) $20,000 $40,000 $40,800 $41,616 $42,448 $43,297 Marketing & PR Assistant $9,360 $18,720 $19,094 $19,476 $19,866 $20,263 Facility Maintenance Supervisor (FT) $9,250 $37,000 $37,740 $38,495 $39,265 $40,050 Maintenance (Grounds) @ 50% of Payroll (FT) $4,680 $18,720 $19,094 $19,476 $19,866 $20,263 Maintenance Custodial l (2-PT) $8,320 $33,280 $33,946 $34,625 $35,317 $36,023 Registration/Customer Service Representative (FT) $3,120 $37,440 $38,189 $38,953 $39,732 $40,526 Registration/Customer Service Representative (PT) $3,200 $38,400 $39,168 $39,951 $40,750 $41,565
  • 83. Subtotal Facility Management $141,850 $391,400 $399,228 $407,213 $415,357 $423,664 Human Resources Generalist - PT (Additional Hours) $2,600 $10,400 $10,608 $10,820 $11,037 $11,257 Finance Assistant (A/P) - PT (Added Position) $5,200 $20,800 $21,216 $21,640 $22,073 $22,515 IT (TBD) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Finance/HR/IT Payroll $7,800 $31,200 $31,824 $32,460 $33,110 $33,772 Fitness Membership Coordinator (Performed by Fitness Mgr.) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Court Coordinator (Basketball) $1,526 $6,106 $7,021 $8,110 $8,515 $9,388 Court Coordinator (Volleyball) $864 $3,455 $3,973 $4,589 $4,819 $5,312 Court Coordinator (Tournaments) $274 $1,094 $1,259 $1,454 $1,526 $1,683 Turf Coordinator (Traveling Soccer) $3,399 $13,598 $15,637 $18,061 $18,964 $20,908 Turf Coordinator (Recreation Soccer) $1,610 $6,442 $7,463 $8,590 $9,090 $9,951 Turf Coordinator (Lacrosse) $428 $1,710 $2,367 $2,733 $2,870 $3,164
  • 84. Turf Coordinator (Football) $786 $3,143 $3,614 $4,174 $4,383 $4,832 Turf Coordinator (Baseball/Softball) $1,121 $4,483 $5,155 $5,955 $6,252 $6,893 Adventure Area Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Birthday Party Management $810 $3,240 $3,726 $4,304 $4,519 $4,982 Corporate Events Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Concessions Manager $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Program Management Payroll $10,817 $43,270 $50,215 $57,969 $60,938 $67,113 Fitness Membership Attendant and Sales Staff $3,415 $40,977 $32,149 $33,630 $34,735 $35,877 Traveling Soccer Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Recreational Soccer Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Basketball Staff $407 $4,884 $5,617 $6,488 $6,812 $7,510 Volleyball Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Court Events Staff $91 $1,094 $1,259 $1,454 $1,526 $1,683 Lacrosse Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Football Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Baseball/Softball Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
  • 85. Rock Wall Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Birthday Party Staff $360 $4,320 $2,208 $2,429 $2,550 $2,678 Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 45 Indoor Concession Staff $1,266 $15,194 $15,953 $16,751 $17,589 $18,468 Summer Camp & Kidz Squad Staff $10,682 $128,185 $132,031 $135,991 $140,071 $144,273 Child Watch Room Staff $438 $5,250 $5,408 $5,570 $5,737 $5,909 Maintenance Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Program Staff Payroll $16,659 $199,904 $194,624 $202,313 $209,020 $216,398 Fitness Membership Class Fitness Instructors (Free) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
  • 86. Performance Fitness Trainers/Class Instructors $40,400 $28,060 $32,409 $34,030 $37,518 Traveling Soccer Camp/Clinic Instructor $1,969 $2,264 $2,615 $2,746 $3,027 Recreation Soccer Camp/Clinic Instructor $4,904 $5,777 $6,599 $7,106 $7,657 Lacrosse Camp/Clinic Instructor $1,500 $1,725 $1,992 $2,092 $2,306 Football Camp/Clinic Instructor $656 $755 $872 $915 $1,009 Baseball Soccer Camp/Clinic Instructor $7,225 $8,309 $9,597 $10,076 $11,109 Basketball Instructors $2,569 $2,954 $3,412 $3,583 $3,950 Basketball Academy Instructors
  • 87. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Volleyball Instructors $3,000 $3,450 $3,985 $4,184 $4,613 Volleyball Academy Instructors $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Climbing Instructors $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Group Events Instructors $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Instructors (COGS) $0 $21,823 $25,234 $29,071 $30,702 $33,671 Traveling Soccer Referees $18,585 $21,373 $24,686 $25,920 $28,577 Recreation Soccer Referees $6,720 $14,026 $16,203 $17,174 $18,828
  • 88. Lacrosse Referees $2,000 $3,100 $3,581 $3,760 $4,145 Football Referees $5,760 $6,624 $7,651 $8,033 $8,857 Basketball Officials $18,202 $20,932 $24,177 $25,386 $27,988 Volleyball Officials $4,240 $4,876 $5,632 $5,913 $6,519 Court Tournament Officials $2,400 $2,760 $3,188 $3,347 $3,690 Subtotal Referee/Officials (COGS) $0 $57,907 $73,691 $85,116 $89,533 $98,604 Payroll Subtotal $177,126 $745,504 $774,816 $814,142 $838,659 $873,222 % of Revenue 47% 43% 39% 39% 37% Health Insurance/Benefits $7,150 $6,600 $6,930 $7,277 $7,640 $8,022
  • 89. IMRF $19,455 $59,164 $60,347 $61,554 $62,785 $64,041 Bonus Pool $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Payroll Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Payroll Taxes (FICA) $13,550 $50,932 $51,706 $53,547 $54,959 $56,682 Payroll Taxes/Benefits/Bonus Totals $40,155 $116,696 $118,983 $122,377 $125,385 $128,746 Total Payroll $217,281 $862,199 $893,799 $936,519 $964,044 $1,001,968 Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 46 Facility and Operating Expenses The following tables represent the expenses for the facility and the operations: Expense Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
  • 90. General Expenses 204-Dues & Subscriptions $1,000 $1,020 $1,040 $1,061 $1,082 205-Education & Training (Management) $5,000 $5,100 $5,202 $5,306 $5,412 206-Education & Training (Staff) $1,000 $1,020 $1,040 $1,061 $1,082 209-Printing $6,000 $6,120 $6,242 $6,367 $6,495 210-Advertising $8,000 $8,160 $8,323 $8,490 $8,659 211-Postage $500 $510 $520 $531 $541 212-Transportation $500 $510 $520 $531 $541 218-Contractual Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 221-Utilities - Gas $30,612 $31,224 $31,848 $32,485 $33,135 222-Utilities - Electric $76,529 $78,059 $79,621 $81,213 $82,837 223-Utilities - Phone $10,000 $10,200 $10,404 $10,612 $10,824 224-Utilities - Water & Sewer $6,888 $7,025 $7,166 $7,309 $7,455 225-Utilities - Disposal $3,000 $3,060 $3,121 $3,184 $3,247 230- Internet Expense $2,000 $2,040 $2,081 $2,122 $2,165
  • 91. 231-Marketing Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 232-Uniforms (Staff) $500 $510 $520 $531 $541 233-Legal $1,000 $1,020 $1,040 $1,061 $1,082 243-Fire Protection $1,035 $1,056 $1,077 $1,098 $1,120 248-Maintenance Agreements $9,000 $9,180 $9,364 $9,551 $9,742 252-Software Maintenance $7,000 $7,140 $7,283 $7,428 $7,577 253-Computer Services $5,000 $5,100 $5,202 $5,306 $5,412 254-Security Services $2,000 $2,040 $2,081 $2,122 $2,165 257-Credit Card Expenses $23,988 $24,468 $24,957 $25,456 $25,965 258-Internet Registration Fees $6,000 $6,120 $6,242 $6,367 $6,495 272-Prof/Community Relations $500 $510 $520 $531 $541 Commodities 303-First Aid $1,000 $1,020 $1,040 $1,061 $1,082 311-Office Supplies $10,000 $10,200 $10,404 $10,612 $10,824 314-Photo ID Supplies $2,000 $2,040 $2,081 $2,122 $2,165 321-Equipment & Supplies $8,000 $8,160 $8,323 $8,490 $8,659
  • 92. 331-Janitorial Supplies $3,000 $3,060 $3,121 $3,184 $3,247 Repairs & Maintenance 424-Maintenance Repairs $15,306 $15,612 $15,924 $16,243 $16,567 434-Equipment & Supplies $10,000 $10,200 $10,404 $10,612 $10,824 436-Grounds Maintenance $5,000 $5,100 $5,202 $5,306 $5,412 Capital Outlay 801-New Equipment $5,000 $5,100 $5,202 $5,306 $5,412 811-Technology $5,000 $5,100 $5,202 $5,306 $5,412 Capital Replacement Program Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC
  • 93. Page 47 CRP Sinking Fund Transfer $50,000 $51,000 $52,020 $53,060 $54,122 Audit Services Audit Services $2,500 $2,550 $2,601 $2,653 $2,706 Insurance Property $3,400 $3,468 $3,537 $3,608 $3,680 Liability & Pollution $3,600 $3,672 $3,745 $3,820 $3,897 EPLI Rate $1,200 $1,224 $1,248 $1,273 $1,299 Workers Compensation (Other Payroll) $4,000 $4,154 $4,312 $4,430 $4,577 Workers Compensation (Maint. Payroll) $3,900 $3,967 $4,046 $4,127 $4,210 Total Facility Expense $339,956 $346,819 $353,830 $360,939 $368,215
  • 94. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 48 Conclusion Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 49 CONCLUSION & PROFESSIONAL RECOMMENDATION To assess the likelihood of success for a multisport and multipurpose sports and recreation facility in Woodridge, the Park District for the Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center project contracted The Sports Facilities Advisory (SFA) to analyze the
  • 95. feasibility and financial viability for the project. The basis for the project is to serve the Woodridge community by developing a first-class sports, recreation, and training facility with an emphasis on court sports, turf sports, fitness, and events. Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will provide sports and recreation opportunities for all ages with an emphasis on families including youth programming and development, adult programs, as well as family participation and community involvement. This feasibility analysis and the associated financial projections encompasses market research (demographics, sports participation, existing providers, etc.) specific to this project and this region. Additionally, this analysis details financial projections and recommendations for operational success. What follows are the professional conclusions, findings, and recommendations for the Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center project: Contributors to Project Success For the Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center project, several positive factors can be found, and these “Contributors to Project Success” are listed below: Site and Location: Both sites are in an established recreational area and supported by the city. In the case of the TIF Site, the facility could benefit from a $5 million TIF to decrease land acquisition, site work, and building expenses and would be able to share
  • 96. parking and resources with an existing Parks and Rec field space to the north. In the case of the Orchard Site, the land would be granted to the project – decreasing land and site work costs by roughly $2.4 million – and the facility would be erected next to an aquatics center that has existing parking and creates a naturally beneficial adjacency and a synergetic use of space based on seasonality. Market and Demographics: Situated in a community with an ideal demographic makeup, the local market can support a facility of this type and size. Despite the heavy volume of existing providers, Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center will be able to capture a large enough percentage of the market to sustain itself and grow into the future. The income and spending trends in this local area are outstanding, and such demographics bode well for a sports facility when it comes to programming mix and pricing. Chicago has a very strong sports market and it is expected that this facility can capitalize on interest and participation as soon as the doors open. Construction Costs: With a projected $12-$14 million in available funding and an additional $5 million TIF, the outlined construction cost of $16,886,441 is in line with budget. Park District track record: The management of the Woodridge Park District currently operates successful programming and has a foundation of an active customer base. The
  • 97. track record for delivering quality service to an already established customer base gives any new facility or operation a head start in marketing new services. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 50 Challenges to Project Success As is the case with many start-up endeavors, there are many obstacles to overcome along the path to creating and maintaining a sports facility that is economically viable and financially sustainable. SFA has outlined these “Challenges to Project Success” below: Financing: After discussing the financing of this project in more detail and based on our expertise in planning and developing facilities – along with our vast experience in Chicago – we feel comfortable that the $17,000,000 in secured funding will be sufficient to build the facility regardless of the site. However, receiving the $5 million TIF from the city would change the
  • 98. entire scope of operations and the speed at which the facility can expect to become sustainable assuming an appropriately minimal level of debt service is owed. Land and Layout: In total, the facility footprint is 4.74 acres. The TIF site is 4 acres and the Orchard Site is 4.5 acres; given the fact that both locations offer shared parking, any adjustments to the plan should be minor but may still be necessary. Existing Providers: Although the market and the opportunity make this a viable facility, there is a high density of existing providers. Both immediate and long-term success is dependent on a strong opening, which will require a significant amount of work on the part of the founding group and management. A detailed pre- opening plan with measurable goals and targets must be developed to ensure that Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center opens with the momentum it needs to be sustainable. Conclusion, Recommendations & Next Steps In identifying the positive contributors to success as well as acknowledging the existing challenges listed above, SFA believes this is a very viable project and, under the correct financing and development terms, SFA, as previously stated, formally endorses the project and deems it to be a “Feasibility: Yes.” The financials, cash flow, and operational metrics all meet SFA qualifications and are typical for a start-up indoor sports
  • 99. facility. For next steps, SFA recommends the following: 1. Floor Plan: SFA recommends creating a detailed floor plan that can be helpful in better analyzing the spaces of the facility and can be used by general contractors for budgetary construction pricing. The floor plan will also be used for investor and financing marketing material. 2. Obtain Building Cost Estimates: To further hone in on budget numbers – and possibly lower construction costs – SFA recommends reaching out to one or more general contractors to get more specific quotes on true building and site costs. We have seen contractors recently get aggressive, especially in Chicago, so any reduction of construction budgets will improve the financial numbers and lower the amount of outside equity needed. 3. TIF Acquisition Strategy: Because the TIF is not guaranteed, SFA recommends additional marketing material such as investment information sheets, community information packets, funding presentations, etc. 4. Facility Development Timeline: A comprehensive development timeline including the short term steps mentioned above as part of a more detailed, longterm, and strategic perspective is important to the developmental success of the facility. The timeline should include critical design, entitlement, construction,
  • 100. development, marketing, branding, staffing, and operational milestones. The milestones should be accompanied by anticipated completion dates so that it serves as a roadmap going forward. SFA suggests utilizing this as a “living document” so that it is adjusted and modified as the development process moves forward. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 51 If steps are taken to address the issues listed above, SFA suggests that this could be a successful facility and viable business model in Woodridge. If the Park District should determine that any such subsequent work is needed beyond this financial forecast and feasibility study, SFA can provide any such materials and support. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL
  • 101. April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 52 APPENDIX See Supporting Documents under separate cover. Feasibility Study ♦ Woodridge Athletic Recreation Center ♦ Woodridge, IL April 2012 The Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC Page 53 You will watch the video and then answer the questions that follows. Make sure you provide will written and well thought out responses. This assignment is worth 2 field observation hour. Please watch the videos that goes allow with this assignment and give well thought out answers.
  • 102. For this assignment, you will complete the Module by reviewing content under the Challenge, Initial Thoughts, Perspectives and Resources, and Wrap it up. You will complete the provide questions afterwards. Be sure to answer incomplete sentences, references information from the module and not use your personal opinion. https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/at/#content (Links to an external site.) Click or copy and paste the module link . Assistive Technology: An Overview Assessment Take some time now to answer the following questions. Please note that the IRIS Center does not collect your Assessment responses. If this is a course assignment, you should turn them in to your professor using whatever method he or she requires. If you have trouble answering any of the questions, go back and review the Perspectives & Resources pages in this module. 1. Name at least three items that could be considered AT and describe how those devices could support a student with a disability in the classroom. 2. Explain two reasons why it is necessary to consider AT for students with disabilities. 3. Why is it important to consider both AT devices and services? 4. Describe three responsibilities of the Implementation Team. 5. List three outcomes the Implementation Team can determine by evaluating a student’s assistive technology. 6. Imagine you are a seventh-grade general education language arts teacher and a student in your class has an upcoming IEP meeting. What types of information should you gather ahead of time to contribute to the discussion of the student’s AT needs? Name at least four. 7. During the meeting suggested in the example above, the IEP team recommends AT for the student. As a general education teacher, describe your role in the AT implementation and evaluation processes.
  • 103. Early Childhood Behavior Management: Teaching and Reinforcing Rules Est. Time: 30 Minutes (including watching videos) The contents of this resource were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, #H325E120002. However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officers, Sarah Allen and Tracie Dickson. Early Childhood Behavior Management: Teaching and Reinforcing Rules Est. Time: 30 Minutes (including watching videos) Objective Understand the importance of teaching and reinforcing rules with young children, including those with disabilities, in early childhood environments. DEC Recommended Practices This Activity addresses the DEC Recommended Practices (DEC RP) topic areas outlined below: Environment E1. Practitioners provide services and supports in natural and inclusive environments during daily routines and activities to promote the child’s access to and participation in learning experiences.
  • 104. Instruction INS4. Practitioners plan for and provide the level of support, accommodations, and adaptations needed for the child to access, participate, and learn within and across activities and routines. INS5. Practitioners embed instruction within and across routines, activities, and environments to provide contextually relevant learning opportunities. Overview Just as early childhood educators or providers use systema tic instruction when they teach letters, numbers, shapes, and colors, so too should they teach classroom rules in a systematic way. Doing so means not only teaching the rules but also providing opportunities to practice them and reinforcing children for following them throughout the day. Early childhood educators or providers should also be prepared to support children in learning, maintaining, and generalizing the behaviors expected of them. In addition, some children who have disabilities might need individualized supports—known as accommodations—in order to learn, practice, and follow the rules. For example, a two-year-old who is deaf and just learning American Sign Language (ASL) might not yet have the ASL skills necessary to understand a teacher’s directions. Visual cues, such as a picture of a child sitting on a carpet square at circle time, can be paired with the sign language directions to help this young child learn the rules.
  • 105. Activity Watch the three YouTube videos from the Pyramid Model Consortium below and be prepared to discuss the questions that follow. In the videos, the children review the STAR Classroom rules: n1http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu 052915 THE IRIS CENTER Early Childhood Behavior Management: Teaching and Reinforcing Rules Est. Time: 30 Minutes (including watching videos) ◦ Stay safe ◦ Take turns ◦ Always clean up our mess ◦ Respectful of our friends Video 1: The STAR Classroom Rules (:33 sec) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWLpG3EaHX0 Video 2: Teaching Rules in Context video (1:02 min) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YUXZQ9FlB8 n2http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu 052915
  • 106. THE IRIS CENTER https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWLpG3EaHX0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YUXZQ9FlB8 Early Childhood Behavior Management: Teaching and Reinforcing Rules Est. Time: 30 Minutes (including watching videos) Video 3: STAR Family Song (1:13 min) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvxW9gtQ_ww Questions/Discussion Topics Video 1 1. In the first video, the teacher is teaching/reviewing the STAR classroom rules. When following DEC Recommended Practices (DEC RP) teachers provide support during naturally occurring daily routines and activities to promote the child’s learning. Teachers embed instruction within these routines. Following are some opportune times when teachers might review rules with young children: • When children arrive in the morning • During a large-group circle time • When a teacher expects a child to have difficulty following
  • 107. expectations or rules • When a child isn’t following the rules a. Which of these was the teacher taking advantage of in the video? b. Why do you think it is beneficial to review rules during these times? c. During what other times might teachers review the rules? d. Imagine that this teacher has a child in her class who has a language delay. With a partner, brainstorm some possible accommodations the teacher might make to help this child learn, practice, and follow the rules. n3http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu 052915 THE IRIS CENTER https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvxW9gtQ_ww Early Childhood Behavior Management: Teaching and Reinforcing Rules Est. Time: 30 Minutes (including watching videos) Video 2 2. The second video highlights a teacher teaching rules in context. The DEC RP states that teachers embed instruction within the naturally occurring