1. Class Summary ­ Word 2010 ­ Part 3 Sep 29, 2015
Run By: Carrie Williams (cwilliamsaz15) MTM Tool: Class Summary
Date Run: Sep 29, 2015 From Saved Query: No
Date: Sep 29, 2015 Instructor(s): Williams Course: Word 2010 ­ Part
3
Learning Provider: New Horizons ­ Southern
California
Location: New Horizons ­ Tucson ­ (Learning
Partner)
Client: Public Class
Summary
Student Instructor Courseware
Business
Results
Additional
Questions
Learning
Effectiveness Environment
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 7.80 8.29 8.00 9.00 8.00 7.50
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
guerranorma@yahoo.com 7.80 7.86 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.50
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Average 8.52 8.63 8.60 8.80 8.60 8.60
Summary (cont)
Student Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 8.06
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 9.00
guerranorma@yahoo.com 7.94
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com 9.00
Average 8.60
Instructor
Student
The instructor was
knowledgeable
about the subject.
Participants were
encouraged to
take part in class
discussions. Instructor overall
The instructor''s
presentation skills
were adequate.
The instructor provided
real­world experiences
and examples. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 9.00 8.00 7.00 7.00 8.00 7.80
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
guerranorma@yahoo.com 8.00 8.00 7.00 8.00 8.00 7.80
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Average 8.80 8.60 8.20 8.40 8.60 8.52
Courseware
Student
Clarity of the
training content
Technical depth of
the training
content
The material was
organized
logically.
Effectiveness of
the labs in
reinforcing the
knowledge/skills
learned in the
modules
Relevance of
the labs to real
world job
situations
Time dedicated to
activities such as
discussions,
practices, and labs
(as opposed to
lecture)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 7.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
guerranorma@yahoo.com 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.00
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Average 8.40 8.60 8.60 8.80 8.80 8.60
Courseware (cont)
Student
Language quality
of the courseware
(grammar,
terminology, style) Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 8.00 8.29
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 9.00 9.00
guerranorma@yahoo.com 8.00 7.86
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com 9.00 9.00
Average 8.60 8.63
Business Results
- 1 / 5 -

2.
Student
This training will
improve my job
performance. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 8.00 8.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 9.00 9.00
guerranorma@yahoo.com 8.00 8.00
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com 9.00 9.00
Average 8.60 8.60
Additional Questions
Student
How well did this
training meet your
expectations? Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 9.00 9.00
guerranorma@yahoo.com 8.00 8.00
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com 9.00 9.00
Average 8.80 8.80
Learning Effectiveness
Student
I have learned new
knowledge/skills
from this training. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 8.00 8.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 9.00 9.00
guerranorma@yahoo.com 8.00 8.00
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com 9.00 9.00
Average 8.60 8.60
Environment
Student
The physical
environment was
conducive to
learning.
The hardware was
setup and
functioning
appropriately. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 7.00 8.00 7.50
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 9.00 9.00 9.00
guerranorma@yahoo.com 8.00 9.00 8.50
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com 9.00 9.00 9.00
Average 8.40 8.80 8.60
Comments
Instructor
Comments: (Instructor)
guerranorma@yahoo.com fast pace. not very patient like other instructors
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 She talked/went to fast.
User Information
First Name
guerranorma@yahoo.com Norma
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com Patrick
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 Lisa
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 Gina
Last Name
guerranorma@yahoo.com Guerra
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com Sikes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 McVetty
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 Rodriguez
Phone Number
guerranorma@yahoo.com 210­818­9114
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com 423­883­5068
- 2 / 5 -

3. A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 212­203­4685
What was your main objective for completing this training?
guerranorma@yahoo.com Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
Courseware
Comments (Courseware):
guerranorma@yahoo.com be more patient.
What suggestions do you have for enhancing the courseware?
guerranorma@yahoo.com more practice activities
Overall Satisfaction
Overall, how satisfied are you with this training course? (check only one) [Student Data]
guerranorma@yahoo.com Somewhat satisfied
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com Very satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 Very satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 Somewhat satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 Very satisfied
Business Results
Based on your response to the prior question, estimate how much of the improvement will be a
direct result of this training.
guerranorma@yahoo.com 80%
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com 100%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 80%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 50%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 100%
Estimate how much you expect your job performance related to the course subject matter to
improve in the next 12 months. Include in your estimate any performance improvements due to
this training, as well as all other factors like on­the job experience, incentives, and process
improvements. (For example, if you feel that you can improve your performance by 20% in the
next 12 months based on this training plus all other factors, enter 20% here.)
guerranorma@yahoo.com 80%
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com 100%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 50%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 70%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 30%
If you think this training will have a positive impact on your job performance, what areas will
be impacted most? Check all that apply.
guerranorma@yahoo.com increasing quality
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com increasing quality
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com increasing productivity
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com increasing customer satisfaction
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 increasing quality
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 decreasing time to complete task(s)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 increasing quality
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 increasing productivity
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 increasing quality
Additional Questions
Is this your first time at New Horizons?
guerranorma@yahoo.com No
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com No
- 3 / 5 -

4. A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 Yes
Would you recommend New Horizons to others?
guerranorma@yahoo.com Yes
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 Yes
Other classes you are interested in taking:
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com Photoshop and Illustrator
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 Pivot Tables
Comments/Suggestions to improve your experience:
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com Inform students that desks in the classroom can't be reserved for future use
Would you be willing to provide a public quote about your experience taking this course?
guerranorma@yahoo.com No
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 No
Return on Investment
Would you like to be notified about advanced or complementary courses?
guerranorma@yahoo.com Yes
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 Yes
Job Impact
What percent of your total work time requires the knowledge or skills presented in this
training? Please check only one.
Patrick.Sikes@millermartin.com 50%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 3 9 7 3 4 50%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 4 8 6 90%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 5 6 4 0 5 0 0 60%
Response Rate
Form Type Evaluations
Sent
Evaluations
Received
Response
Rate
Post Event 7 5 71.43%
Report Recommendations
Interpreting the Report
Below are tips to help you understand the information in the report. For additional information, please click the Help tab above the
report.
Summarizes scores from each student for selected question categories and questions; compare and analyze scores for all students
that completed evaluations.
Student comments provide additional insight into the scores displayed within the report.
Determine the students’ overall perceived value derived specifically from training to proactively manage future training events.
Recommended Actions
Below are recommended next steps to take after reviewing the information in this report. Additionally, you'll find links to
automatically run complementary reports for drilling­down further into the data or analyzing the information in another way.
If any learner rated the class much lower than others, and the learner provided an email address, follow up with that person to
gather additional feedback regarding the scores. Share that feedback with instructor and course managers as areas for
improvement.
If any learner rated the class much higher than others, especially in the areas of job impact or business results, follow up with
those learners to gether additional feedback on how they were able to maximize their use of what they learned on the job. Share
this feedback with course managers to ensure they share the knowledge with future learners to maximize job impact and business
results.
Schedule this report to be emailed automatically to the course and instructor managers on a daily basis so they are able to review
performance on a regular basis.
Recommended Links
- 4 / 5 -

5. ver. 001
Run the Learner Comments report to review all the qualitative feedback for specific approaches to make the learning more
effective and impactful.
Run the Quick Question report to summarize the scale­based and multiple­choice answers for all of the evaluations.
Run the Performance to Goals report to view how these results compared to your goals.
Report Criteria
Reporting Date: Sep 29, 2015 to Sep 29, 2015
Scale: 1 Low ­ 9 High
Class: Word 2010 ­ Part 3 Sep 29, 2015
- 5 / 5 -