1. Class Summary
Run By: Carrie Williams (cwilliams@nhsocal.com) MTM Tool: Class Summary
Date Run: Dec 19 2015 From Saved Query: No
Date: Dec 16 2015 Instructor(s): Williams Course: PowerPoint 2013 Part 2
Learning Provider: New Horizons Southern California Location: New Horizons Tucson (Learning Partner) Client: Public Class
Summary
Student Instructor Courseware Business Results Additional Questions
Learning
Effectiveness Environment
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 9.00 8.71 8.00 9.00 8.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 9.00 8.57 NaN 5.00 5.00 8.50
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 8.43 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 9.00 9.00 8.00 8.00 7.00 8.00
Average 9.00 8.74 8.50 8.00 7.60 8.70
Summary (cont)
Student Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 8.76
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 8.25
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 8.76
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 8.65
Average 8.69
Instructor
Student
The instructor was
knowledgeable about the
subject.
Participants were
encouraged to take part
in class discussions. Instructor overall
The instructor''s
presentation skills were
adequate.
The instructor provided realworld
experiences and examples. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Average 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Courseware
Student
Clarity of the training
content
Technical depth of the
training content
The material was
organized logically.
Effectiveness of the labs
in reinforcing the
knowledge/skills learned
in the modules
Relevance of the
labs to real world
job situations
Time dedicated to activities
such as discussions,
practices, and labs (as
opposed to lecture)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.00 8.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 8.00 7.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 6.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.00
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Average 8.80 8.00 9.00 9.00 8.80 8.60
Courseware (cont)
- 1 / 6 -
2.
Student
Language quality of the
courseware (grammar,
terminology, style) Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 9.00 8.71
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 9.00 8.57
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 8.43
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 9.00 9.00
Average 9.00 8.74
Business Results
Student
This training will
improve my job
performance. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 8.00 8.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 NaN
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 9.00
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 8.00 8.00
Average 8.50 8.50
Additional Questions
Student
How well did this
training meet your
expectations? Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 5.00 5.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 9.00
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 8.00 8.00
Average 8.00 8.00
Learning Effectiveness
Student
I have learned new
knowledge/skills from
this training. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 8.00 8.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 5.00 5.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 9.00
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 7.00 7.00
Average 7.60 7.60
Environment
Student
The physical
environment was
conducive to learning.
The hardware was setup
and functioning
appropriately. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 9.00 8.00 8.50
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 9.00 9.00 9.00
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 8.00 8.00 8.00
- 2 / 6 -
3.
Average 8.80 8.60 8.70
Comments
Instructor
Comments: (Instructor)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 She was very well spoken, calm and very patient. Very knowledgeable
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 Carrie is very welcoming, understanding, and happy to assist anyone in need. She made the experience great.
User Information
First Name
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM Michelle
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 Lindsey
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 Angela
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 JESSICA
Last Name
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM Schulz
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 Belz
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 Beard
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 YEATES
Phone Number
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 3102556846
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 (520)3028317
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 3372813309
What was your main objective for completing this training?
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM Other
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 Prepare for a certification exam
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 Prepare for a career change
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
Courseware
What suggestions do you have for enhancing the courseware?
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 Make it easier for the instructor to show video inserts. Due to embedding wouldn't let you do it.
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 More in depth analysis of why one would want to perform a certain function
Overall Satisfaction
Overall, how satisfied are you with this training course? (check only one) [Student Data]
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM Very satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 Very satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 Somewhat satisfied
- 3 / 6 -
4. A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 Somewhat satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 Somewhat satisfied
Business Results
Based on your response to the prior question, estimate how much of the improvement will be a direct result of this training.
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 20%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 100%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 50%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 0%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 10%
Estimate how much you expect your job performance related to the course subject matter to improve in the next 12 months.
Include in your estimate any performance improvements due to this training, as well as all other factors like onthe job
experience, incentives, and process improvements. (For example, if you feel that you can improve your performance by
20% in the next 12 months based on this training plus all other factors, enter 20% here.)
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 40%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 100%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 50%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 0%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 0%
If you think this training will have a positive impact on your job performance, what areas will be impacted most? Check all
that apply.
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM increasing quality
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM decreasing time to complete task(s)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 increasing quality
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 increasing productivity
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 increasing ability to innovate
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 decreasing time to complete task(s)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 increasing customer satisfaction
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 increasing employee satisfaction
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 increasing quality
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 increasing productivity
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 increasing ability to innovate
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 increasing ability to innovate
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 increasing quality
Additional Questions
Is this your first time at New Horizons?
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 No
- 4 / 6 -
5. Would you recommend New Horizons to others?
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 Yes
Comments/Suggestions to improve your experience:
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 I'm not feeling very well today, which is not the fault of New Horizons!
Would you be willing to provide a public quote about your experience taking this course?
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 No
Return on Investment
Would you like to be notified about advanced or complementary courses?
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 No
Job Impact
What percent of your total work time requires the knowledge or skills presented in this training? Please check only one.
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM 20%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 100%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 3 7 4 50%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 4 6 3 0%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 4 5 8 4 10%
Environment
Comments (Environment):
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 5 3 4 8 8 Very well done
General Questions
Other (please specify) [What was your main objective for completing this training?]:
MICHELLE.SCHULZ@SCE.COM Build on current skills
Response Rate
Form Type Evaluations Evaluations Response
- 5 / 6 -
6. ver. 001
Sent Received Rate
Post Event 5 5 100.00%
Report Recommendations
Interpreting the Report
Below are tips to help you understand the information in the report. For additional information, please click the Help tab above the report.
Summarizes scores from each student for selected question categories and questions; compare and analyze scores for all students that completed evaluations.
Student comments provide additional insight into the scores displayed within the report.
Determine the students’ overall perceived value derived specifically from training to proactively manage future training events.
Recommended Actions
Below are recommended next steps to take after reviewing the information in this report. Additionally, you'll find links to automatically run complementary reports for
drillingdown further into the data or analyzing the information in another way.
If any learner rated the class much lower than others, and the learner provided an email address, follow up with that person to gather additional feedback regarding the
scores. Share that feedback with instructor and course managers as areas for improvement.
If any learner rated the class much higher than others, especially in the areas of job impact or business results, follow up with those learners to gether additional feedback
on how they were able to maximize their use of what they learned on the job. Share this feedback with course managers to ensure they share the knowledge with future
learners to maximize job impact and business results.
Schedule this report to be emailed automatically to the course and instructor managers on a daily basis so they are able to review performance on a regular basis.
Recommended Links
Run the Learner Comments report to review all the qualitative feedback for specific approaches to make the learning more effective and impactful.
Run the Quick Question report to summarize the scalebased and multiplechoice answers for all of the evaluations.
Run the Performance to Goals report to view how these results compared to your goals.
Report Criteria
Reporting Date: Dec 1 2015 to Dec 31 2015
Form Type: Follow Up;
Instructor Survey;
Post Event
Category: Additional Questions;
Business Results;
Courseware;
Environment;
General Questions;
Instructor;
Job Impact;
Learning Effectiveness;
Overall Satisfaction;
Return on Investment;
User Information
Scale: 1 Low 9 High
Class: PowerPoint 2013 Part 2 Dec 16, 2015
- 6 / 6 -
