1. -"A NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR A NEW ERA"-
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/super-position-momentum-
space-wavefunction-carlo-m-rosa?trk=pulse_spock-articles
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/quantum-physics-carlo-m-
rosa?trk=mp-reader-card
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/my-familys-military-order-
carlo-m-rosa-?trk=pulse_spock-articles
http://www.slideshare.net/CARLOMROSA/aise-63855245
http://www.slideshare.net/CARLOMROSA/my-summary-
written-in-freedom-x-x-62961849
http://www.slideshare.net/CARLOMROSA/central-america-
61439572
2. Information gleaned from various sources.
-“A BRIEF DESCRIPTION” -
-Quantum physics is the physical theory that describes the behavior of
matter, radiation and all their interactions views as both wave
phenomena as either particle phenomena (wave-particle duality), unlike
the classical Newtonian physics based on Isaac Newton's theories
or, which sees for example the light just like wave and the electron just as
a particle.
3. ***In May 1926, Schrödinger proved that Heisenberg's matrix
mechanics and his ownwave mechanics made the same predictions about
the properties and behaviour of the electron; mathematically, the two
theories had an underlying common form. Yet the two men disagreed on
the interpretation of their mutual theory. For instance, Heisenberg
accepted the theoretical prediction of jumps of electrons between orbitals
in an atom, but Schrödinger hoped that a theory based on continuous
wave-like properties could avoid what he called (as paraphrased
by Wilhelm Wien) "this nonsense about quantum jumps."
The reconceived theory is formulated in various specially developed
mathematical formalisms. In one of them, a mathematical function,
the wave function, provides information about the probability amplitude
of position, momentum, and other physical properties of a particle.
Important applications of quantum mechanical theory
include uperconducting magnets, light-emitting diodes and the laser, the
transistor and semicoductors such as the microprocessor, medical and
research imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging magnetic
resonance and electron microscopy, and explanations for many biological
and physical phenomena.
Wave–particle duality is the fact that every elementary particle or
quantic entity exhibits the properties of not only particles, but also waves.
It addresses the inability of the classical concepts "particle" or "wave" to
fully describe the behavior of quantum-scale objects.
As Einstein wrote: "It seems as though we must use sometimes the one
theory and sometimes the other, while at times we may use either. We are
faced with a new kind of difficulty.
We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately neither of them
fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do".
The wave view did not immediately displace the ray and particle view,
but began to dominate scientific thinking about light in the mid 19th
4. century, since it could explain polarization phenomena that the
alternatives could not.
Visualization
There are two ways to visualize the wave-particle behaviour: by the
"standard model" and by the Broglie–Bohm model, where no duality is
perceived.
The more localized the position-space wavefunction, the more likely the
particle is to be found with the position coordinates in that region, and
correspondingly the momentum-space wavefunction is less localized so
the possible momentum components the particle could have are more
widespread.
Conversely the more localized the momentum-space wavefunction, the
more likely the particle is to be found with those values of momentum
components in that region, and correspondingly the less localized the
position-space wavefunction, so the position coordinates the particle
could occupy are more widespread.
When we do ,we form a the "superposition" of the individual matter
waves,these superpositions turn out to have a central role in the theory of
matter waves and in quantum theory as a whole.
The distances between adjacent peaks and troughs differ in different
parts of the wave.
Wave–particle duality is an ongoing conundrum in modern physics.
Most physicists accept wave-particle duality as the best explanation for a
broad range of observed phenomena; however, it is not without
controversy. Alternative views are not generally accepted by mainstream
physics, but serve as a basis for valuable discussion within the
community.
When first discovered, particle diffraction was a source of great puzzlement.
Are"particles" really "waves?" .
Today it is possible to detect the arrival of individual electrons, and to see the diffraction
pattern emerge as a statistical pattern made up of many small spots (Tonomura et al.,
1989). Evidently, quantum particles are indeed particles, but whose behaviour is very
different from classical physics would have us to expect.
5. It has been claimed that the Afshar experiment (2007) shows that it is
possible to simultaneously observe both wave and particle properties of
photons. This claim is, however, rejected by other scientists.
Wave–particle duality is exploited in electron microscopy, where the
small wavelengths associated with the electron can be used to view
objects much smaller than what is visible using visible light.
The nature of consciousness remains deeply mysterious and profoundly
important, with existential, medical and spiritual implication.
We know what it is like to be conscious – to have awareness, a conscious
‘mind’, but who, or what, are ‘we’ who know such things?.
How is the subjective nature of phenomenal experience – our ‘inner life’ -
to be explained in scientific terms? What consciousness actually is, and
how it comes about remain unknown. The general assumption in modern
science and philosophy - the ‘standard model’ - is that consciousness
emerges from complex computation among brain neurons, computation
whose currency is seen as neuronal firings (‘spikes’) and synaptic
transmissions, equated with binary ‘bits’ in digital computing.
Consciousness is presumed to ‘emerge’ from complex neuronal
computation, and to have arisen during biological evolution as an
adaptation of living systems, extrinsic to the makeup of the universe. On
the other hand, spiritual and contemplative traditions, and some
scientists and philosophers consider consciousness to be intrinsic, ‘woven
into the fabric of the universe’.
In these views, conscious precursors and Platonic forms preceded biology,
existing all along in the fine scale structure of reality.
6. -”A CONCISE EXPLANATION”-
*Postil.
As always in this brief digression I will use words and concepts (already)
been used “from others about my work”.
-” THE SUPER POSITION -MOMENTUM- SPACE
WAVEFUNCTION”-
°I am not obviously a scientist but ( almost “personally” unexpected) I was
told and explained by authoritative international characters, “Absolute
Enlightenment” in the art and photography “field” that, through an
“unique and innovative use” of The Analog Photocamera as
a“filter between me and the reality”, I managed to get into the
metaphysics.
***I was also told that not many people in the world are able to
perform this exercise with noticeable and undeniable results .
7. §“Photo manent ,verba volant”.
>Let me just say with great humility that the “feeling” (although at the
time quite unconscious) boosting “my own climax TO FIND THE SUPER
POSITION -MOMENTUM- SPACE WAVEFUNCTION” , It is a
wonderful feeling , both physically than mentally, also having
regard to the concrete results.
-“These are just words ... let the images communicate the
concept”-.
§In his manuscripts on painting, Leonardo wrote:
“The air is full of an infinite number of radiant pyramids caused by the
objects located in it. These pyramids intersect and interweave without
interfering with each other.…The semblance of a body is carried by them
as a whole into all parts of the air and each smallest part receives into itself
the image that has been caused.”
-Nowadays, scientists and engineers prefer to think in terms of light
rays rather than Leonardo’s more poetic “radiant pyramids.” But light-
field photography is based precisely on his idea that the light arriving at
any point—what he called the “smallest part” of the air—carries all the
information necessary to reproduce any view that can be had from that
position.
An ordinary digital camera do that?.
Not at all.
-In a conventional digital camera, the light rays hitting each point on the
image sensor combine. The sensor records the total intensity of the light
rays landing on each point, or photosite, but in the process loses directional
information about where the different rays came from.
8. >So the best like a typical analog camera can provide is the familiar
two-dimensional photograph, which has a fixed point of view and a focus
determined entirely by how the lens was set when the photo was snapped.
>Light-field photography is far more ambitious.
***Instead of merely recording the sum of all the light rays falling on each
photosite, a light-field camera aims to measure the intensity and direction
of every incoming ray.
§With that information, you can generate not just one but every possible
image of whatever is within the camera’s field of view at that moment:
For example, a portrait photographer oftenadjusts the lens of the camera
so that the subject’s face is in focus, leaving what’s behind purposefully
blurry.
-Others might want to blur the face and make a tree in the background
razor sharp.With light-field photography, you can attain either effectfrom
the very same snapshot.
***The information a light-field camera records is,
mathematically speaking, part of something that optics
specialists call the plenoptic function .
>This function describes the totality of light rays filling a given region of
space at any one moment. It’s a function of five dimensions, because you
need three
(x,y, andz) to specify the position of eachvantage point, plus two more
(often denotedθand(φ) for the angle of every incoming ray.
9. -When measuring light in a region that’s free of any obstructions, you have
to keeptrack of only four dimensions rather than five.
>Think about it:
If you know that a ray isn’t blocked, it’s simple to follow where it goes.
-Record where it hits one plane (x and y) and the angle at which it hits
(θ an φ) and you can work out where it came from and where it’s headed.
The same is true for any other ray hitting that plane at any angle. So with
just the knowledge of the light crossing a single plane, you can calculate the
position and direction of the rays filling the surrounding region, so long as
there are no obstructions present.
§This four-dimensional function is called the light field (hence
the term light-field).