Euthanasia Position Paper: The Right to Choose Death with Dignity

Euthanasia Position Paper
Assisted Suicide, mercy killing, euthanasia; whatever you call it or however we justified it is killing by all means. Euthanasia is a practice of ending a
life to release an individual from an incurable disease or intolerable suffering. It is an action which brings intentional death to a patient. In the case of
the elderly cancer patient, the family and the patient does not know whether or not to commit euthanasia. The author response in this case, is that the
elderly cancer patient should not go for euthanasia, since she has a biographical life. He came to the right conclusion, even though he did not have a
valid argument. The author should have advised the patient not to commit euthanasia by using the three main arguments against...show more content...
This means if one lost his or her biographical life, they have the right to commit euthanasia. I disagree with the author on that people might have the
right to euthanasia. The three most common arguments against euthanasia are the Bible from a Christian prospective, the effective pain management,
and the fear of abuse if euthanasia were legalized.
One of the biggest arguments against euthanasia is the religious argument, which was not mentioned by the author. Most religious groups especially
Christianity goes against euthanasia. The practice of euthanasia is wrong because it violates the principle that life is given by God. God doesn't
approve of "hands that shed innocent blood". Life comes from God. It is God's decision to give life and to take it away. In the Bible, "shedding
innocent blood" is called murder. Thedeath of King Sol is an example of euthanasia. Saul did not want the philistines to find him alive. He knew they
would torture him. He asked his solider to kill him. When the solider refused, Sol fell on his own sword and died. Sol committed suicide, but he did it
to avoid suffering. He murdered himself and therefore was guilty of sin. Not all suffering is bad. Even though one may not always understand why he
/she suffers, some good can come from it.
The apostle Paul understood this. He had a "thorn in the flesh" he asked God to remove, but he realized afterward that it was for his good.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia – Response to Anti Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia is a topic that provokes as much controversy as capital punishment, primarily because it is irreversible. The question of euthanasia being
right or wrong is one that most would prefer left alone. However, recent publicity on changes to existing laws has ignited considerable discussion and
has forced open the door to a much wider audience. The issues related to direct euthanasia have raised many questions in my mind, to which I am still
searching for answers. I believe it is necessary to consider arguments, both, for and against, in order to come to any conclusion. In this paper I will
address Brian Clowes' article in the "Pro–Life Activist's Encyclopedia", located on the...show more content...
Yet, his persistent use of medical cases where patients were classified as irreversibly comatose and where all decisions regarding their continual
treatment were made by others, neglects to recognize the numerous cases of terminally ill patients, who simply ask for the right to control their
own destiny and to die with dignity. His use of extreme cases, all of which were found in 'National Right to Life News', gives the reader a distorted
picture and neglects the many types of cases where the prolonging of life would be cruel, inhumane and immoral. (Johnstone, 1994:353)
EUTHANASIA SETS A BAD EXAMPLE? I would ask what kind of example are we giving our young by prolonging life at whatever cost to the
person? Is quantity of life always the best option? Is the taking of human life always wrong? In the 18th century William Mitford, an English historian
stated "Men fear death, as if unquestionably the greatess evil, and yet no man knows that it may not be the greatest good." (Bradley,
Daniels & Jones, 1969:194) Here the author compares the act of suicide among the young with the act of euthanasia with the terminally ill. He
believes, in making euthanasia an acceptable social practice, it will inevitably have negative repercussions on the rest of society. The writer argues that
by condoning euthanasia, we condone

Research Paper on Euthanasia
Research Paper on Euthanasia
Paper Presented to
Professor
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction....................................................................1
Eight Arguments to Consider................................................2
The Right to Die...............................................................2
Patient Suffering................................................................3
Slippery Slope to Legalized Murder.........................................4
Hippocratic Oath and Prohibition of Killing...............................5
Government Involvement.....................................................5
Palliative Care..................................................................6
Healthcare Spending Implications...........................................7

Value of Life....................................................................7
Conclusion......................................................................8
Works Cited....................................................................9
EUTHANASIA – The Right to Choose or a Slippery Slope...show more content...
A state's categorical ban on physician assistance to suicide –– as applied to competent, terminally ill patients who wish to avoid unendurable pain and
hasten inevitable death –– substantially interferes with this protected liberty interest and cannot be sustained." – ACLU [3] On the other hand is
someone who is in the situation of confronting a terminal illness or who has been in unbearable pain for a protracted period of time able to make
such a decision. Everyone has been in pain in their life and thought about what it would be like to face a life threatening illness, but they are thinking
about it when they are not in that situation. With this calm state of mind one could more rationally make a life and death decision, but once in those
circumstances would anyone be clear enough to decide to end their life?
Patient Suffering Pro Euthanasia advocates believe that nobody should have to suffer long, painful, and hopeless circumstances if they don't want
to. Why should the state be allowed to keep someone alive who is in pain and has no hope of recovery? People in a persistent vegetative state, and
people who have a terminal illness all deal with a life of intense pain, decreased quality of life, a sense of hopelessness. If they can choose to die and
there is no hope of a meaningful recovery why should they not be allowed to end that suffering, why does a government have the right to stop them and

In doctor helped suicide, the choice to end a tolerant's life is given to a patient learning of the persistent's aim. Dissimilar to killing, in doctor helped
suicide, somebody makes passing accessible, yet does not specifically regulate the demise (Broeckaert 1). Willful extermination is executing somebody
who is experiencing a torment, sickness or damage. Willful extermination implies that somebody other than the patient confers an activity with the
expectation to end the tolerant's life, for instance infusing a patient with a deadly dosage of pharmaceutical. Patients may agree to Euthanasia which is
intentional Euthanasia, deny Euthanasia which is automatic Euthanasia, or be not able to agree to Euthanasia which is non deliberate Euthanasia
(Walsh 1)....show more content...
Laws oblige that a doctor should just analyze an evil patient that has a future of six months or less and a second specialist then must concur with the
conclusion (Worsnop, 1). Patients must demand the remedy twice verbally and once in composed structure with a holding up time of no less than two
weeks between the first and last demand (Worsnop, 1). In conclusion the specialist who composes themedicine must accept the patient is rationally
equipped to settle on the choice. The law additionally obliges that patients have the capacity to take the pills all alone (Worsnop, 1). I accept that it is
vital to listen to and recognize the patient when they express enduring, misery, and gloom. I accept that doctor helped and additionally deliberate
Euthanasia ought to be

Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia is the practice of ending a life to release an individual from suffering an incurable disease or intolerable pain. Having to lay in bed
twenty–four hours a day is no way to live a life. People that suffer from a serious illness should have the right to die by euthanasia. In
1991, a national telephone survey was conducted which posed the question, "If you were terminally ill, what would you want for yourself?"
Fifty–two percent of one thousand four in the US said that they'd consider assisted suicide or euthanasia. Among the reasons cited were that the people
wouldn't want to burden others, live in pain, or be dependent on machines. All Americans have the right to die because the
Constitution grants us the...show more content...
As Americans, people have the right to pursue happiness. A person's only way to be happy may be death, so why shouldn't they be able to be happy.
Having the right to be happy is an American right, even if it means death.
There are those who argue that if euthanasia becomes legal it will become abused and overused. This is a good point, however, if we determine the
use on a case by case basis this wont be a problem.
People also argue that it is against religion. People believe, "Only God can give life and only God should take it away." But I ask, "Why would
God prolong such pain and suffering?" Jesus Christ suffered and died on a cross, would he want to see his people go through suffering like he had to?
So should one have the right to die? I feel a person is entitled to that choice. The word 'euthanasia' come from the Greek––eu, meaning good, and
thanatos, meaning death. So the word euthanasia means
"good death" by it's origins. Euthanasia is a way of putting an end to a person's life in which they are suffering or totally dependent on others or
machines. Having the right to die, should become legal so many suffering people can end their pain legally. Sometimes euthanasia serves the interest
of everyone concerned and is the best choice for the terminally ill person. It relieves the person of unbearable pain and provides a merciful and
dignified end to their life. It also relieves the terrible emotional strain on

The Morality Of Euthanasia By James Rachels
Student: Gretel Herrera–Martinez
Panther ID: 3339147
Active Euthanasia
Does James Rachels in "The Morality of Euthanasia" successfully argue that in at least some cases active euthanasia is morally acceptable? Explain
his view and respond to it.
In this essay, we are going to analyze the main ideas included in "The Morality of Euthanasia" by James Rachels to provide a response to the following
question: Does James Rachels in "The Morality of Euthanasia" successfully argue that in at least some cases active euthanasia is morally acceptable?
Having read and analyzed this article in my opinion Mr. James Rachels successfully argues that in at least some cases active euthanasia is morally
acceptable. First of all and to better understand the position of the author we need to understand the principal concepts involved in this article. We need
to define euthanasia and classify the different types of euthanasia. Euthanasia is considered as a good death, it is the act or omission that accelerates the
death of a patient sick with no cure, with or without their approval (as in the case of people in a coma), with the intention of stopping suffering and
pain. Euthanasia is associated with the end of life to stop or avoid suffering.
Today, the fact that euthanasia is morality or immorality permissible is a very controversial issue debated and discussed by doctors and philosophers.
This point generated a controversial debate. The discussion takes into account the ethics of medical

Essay on The Pros and Cons of Euthanasia
Euthanasia, good or bad? In this following article I will be exploring euthanasia in more detail, the different Christian points of view, the strengths and
weaknesses of the euthanasia argument and finally my point of view on euthanasia and why I believe this.
First of all, what is euthanasia? It is something that not many people think about until they or a friend or family member is put in a position where they
might actually have to consider it. Euthanasia, in the dictionary, simply is: the action of ending someone's life in a painless way. It seems pretty
simple but in reality it is a lot more complicated, not only for the people involved but for the society in general as well.
Overall there are four different types of...show more content...
One of the most important pieces of scripture a Christian follows is the 10 commandments and one, and in my opinion the most important,
commandment is "Do not commit murder." (Exodus 20:13)
This raises the question, is euthanasia murder? and in many Christian's view is that if a life is taken away earlier than God planed then it is murder
and therefore many Christian's point of view on euthanasia is that it is wrong.
Another quotation that supports what I believe is the general view of many Christians around the world is the idea that God has already planned out
our life and knows when the right time to die is. This is shown in the bible saying "He set the time for birth, and the time for death." (Ecclesiastes 3:2)
and again here: "your days allotted to me, had all been recorded in your book, before any of them began." (Psalm 139:16)
Both these quotations show, according to the bible, that God has already planned out our life–from the time that we are born to the time of our death.
The last Christian point of view is also shown through the bible saying "You created every part of me, you put me together in my mother's womb."
(Psalms 139:13)
This quotation is saying that God created everything about us and not only is linked with the point of view above saying that God has already
planned out our lives but is also linked with the idea that God created us and chose when we were born so he should

Ethics of Euthanasia Essay
As patients come closer to the end of their lives, certain organs stop performing as well as they use to. People are unable to do simple tasks like
putting on clothes, going to the restroom without assistance, eat on our own, and sometimes even breathe without the help of a machine. Needing to
depend on someone for everything suddenly brings feelings of helplessness much like an infant feels. It is easy to see why some patients with
terminal illnesses would seek any type of relief from this hardship, even if that relief is suicide. Euthanasia or assisted suicide is where a physician
would give a patient an aid in dying. "Assisted suicide is a controversial medical and ethical issue based on the question of whether, in certain situations,
...show more content...
Whether murder is done in a peaceful, non painful way or in a very gruesome, unimaginable way, it is still considered murder. Physicians have no
way of knowing 'what is best for the patient' especially if that patient's terminal illness prevents them from speaking. Not only is assisted suicide
considered murder, it also goes against Physicians' Hippocratic Oath. "Hippocratic Oath: An oath (or promise) all physicians must swear to uphold,
regarding the ethical practices of the medical profession" (Lee). By allowing doctors to stray from this oath, it will be easier for them to aid in or
carry out assisted suicides when it will never be entirely necessary for them to consider the option. "In 2005, Texas doctors removed two patients from
life support without advanced directions and against the wishes of the patient's family" (Pawlick). By not legalizing assisted suicides, families will be
able to decide when their family member is physically unable to continue with the provided treatments, but only when the patient themselves can no
longer communicate their wishes and no document stating how they should go about the situation has been left in their families possession.
Ethical issues are not the only problem. Some argue that euthanasia also creates issues from a legal perspective. "One legal question is whether assisted
suicide violates the Controlled Substances Act, a federal law governing the distribution of drugs" (Lee). Such

Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia
Final Draft
Euthanasia is a controversial contemporary issue discussed in philosophy and bioethics. The debate has encapsulated regions of the United States and
Europe. An array of research has established evidence of euthanasia, in light of 'treatment' for terminally ill patients and any individual who wishes to
have the right to die. Generally, euthanasia is regarded as, a criminal homicide at the request of a suffering patient. Individuals who are in favor of
euthanasia have expressed reasons for their passionate support of euthanasia. Researchers have conducted research mainly in the state of Oregon in
which euthanasia has been legalized since 1997, for the past 20–years. Reference is also made of Washington, Montana, Vermont and Mexico. On the
international scale regions in Europe such as the Netherlands, Belgium and the UK has legalized Physician–assisted suicide. These countries have
become models for others who have shown interest in Euthanasia and want to legalize Physician–assisted suicide. Research has shed light on the nature
of medicine from the perspective the family members and physicians.
Euthanasia and physician–assisted suicide is a reality for many sick and dying patients. The researchers aim to inform general population and influence
others to join in the argument of the topic. There are different types of euthanasia, which include non–voluntary euthanasia and voluntary euthanasia.
This paper is a literature review focused on voluntary euthanasia,

Euthanisa Outline
SAMPLE PERSUASIVE OUTLINE – AVERAGE Student Y February 17, 2005 Section AY Topic: Euthanasia Goal: To persuade the audience that
physician–assisted suicide, which is a subset category of euthanasia, should be a legal option. Thesis: All terminally ill patients or individuals in
chronic severe pain should have the option of a peaceful and quick death to minimize suffering. Introduction A.Attention Gaining Device: On
November 23, 2000 my mother passed away. She had terminal ovarian cancer, but that was not the cause of her death. B.Significance for this
audience: There are so many terminal illnesses in the world, that there is a significant chance that you will at some point know someone, if you do not
already, who is...show more content...
B. I disagree with this assertion and argue that there is no evidence for a decrease in care. C. While opponents reason that the option of euthanasia
will lead to hospitals to restrict care to terminally ill patients, the evidence indicates otherwise. 1. In actuality, hospice utilization will not decrease as
patients choose assisted dying. 2. In Oregon, where assisted suicide is legal, hospice referrals have doubled. D. Rather than supporting the claim that
euthanasia will decrease care, there is evidence for an increase in care when we finally begin talking about death as a natural part of life that can be
ended consciously. Transition: Since hospice care is so widely used and hospice assistants can accelerate the patient's death through terminal sedation
and dehydration, you might argue that there is no need for a law permitting doctor–assisted suicide. Conclusion A.Review of main points: I have gone
over some of the major moral and societal concerns you may have regarding the legalization of euthanasia. B.Restate thesis: I have shown that those
concerns are not necessary. C.Restate significance: Something needs to be done. Is prolonged suffering the most compassionate way to end a life?
D.Concluding device: I know

Euthanasia: Dying with Dignity Essay
Euthanasia: Dying with Dignity Someday, a loved one may be faced with tough times or a terrible tragedy that leaves them in pain and agony for the
rest of their life. It may not happen today, tomorrow, or even next month, but it is always a good idea to have a well thought out plan. A terminal
illness could strike at any minute such as Lou Gehrig's disease, or a car accident could leave someone paralyzed and miserable for the rest of their life.
Permitting euthanasia would give the people the right to die with dignity and give them the option to not have to go through the pain, suffering, and
stressful effects of a terminal illness. The Hippocratic Oath has been a major road block in legalizing the euthanasia process. Even though the...show
more content...
There is also non–voluntary euthanasia which is illegal worldwide because it is the termination of life in children. The third type of euthanasia is
involuntary euthanasia, which World War Two brought about when the Nazi's built the death camps, also known as concentration camps. Auschwitz
was one of the most common Concentration Camps known for the involuntary euthanasia usage. It is the voluntary euthanasia that has been around for
centuries and has more support. Euthanasia was dated back to the fifth century BC to the first century AD when the Ancient Greeks and Romans
supported the process. They only used it in cases where the person had prolonged pain and in complete agony. Even though there was a Hippocratic
Oath, stating a doctor can do no harm, they still went through with the procedure at the request of the patient. As time went on through the Middle
Ages, Christians showed more opposition in the area, so voluntary death became a very rare practice.
Euthanasia was dropped after the fall of Rome. Thomas Aquinas' arguments on suicide began to change opinions as well because it was his belief
that life was God's gift and suicide violates God's authority over life. Centuries passed and decades have gone, the topic of euthanasia was still a
tender topic. Ohio enters the years 1995 and 1996; the people tried to push a bill to legalize euthanasia in the state, but were turned down quickly. It
was not until 1915 when Doctor Haiselden

Thesis Statement Against Euthanasia
Title: Argue Against Euthanasia
Thesis Statement: The Philippine should not allow Euthanasia because it is form of murder
Problem: Should we allow Euthanasia in the Philippines?
Answer: No
1.Introduction
1.1 Argue against Euthanasia without Resorting to "Because God doesn't like it."
2.Against Euthanasia
2.1 killing of an innocent man or child.
2.2 it morally questionable to our society
3.Resorting to Religious Belief
3.1 god has the rights
3.2 only god may decide when we will die.
4. Problems
4.1 does not solve the problem
4.2 suffering
5. Conclusion
5.1 I conclude that we should not legalized the Euthanasia here in the Philippines.
Introduction:
People all knows that Euthanasia is the act of killing someone who is very sick...show more content...
All faith's offer meaning and explanations for death and dying; faiths try to find a place for death and dying within human experience. God gives
people life, so only god has the right to talk it away. Human lives are important because God created them, Therefore human should be protected and
preserved whatever happens and therefore we shouldn't interfere with God's plans by shortening human lives and the catholics are disapprove of
Euthanasia. Religions are opposed to euthanasia for a number of

Euthanasia Essay : Euthanasia And Euthanasia
This is why Euthanasia is important and summarizing the research that I found on Euthanasia. Euthanasia is important because there is a lot of
arguments about Euthanasia. Some people support it and some people do not support Euthanasia (Euthanasia and assisted suicide– Arguments).
Euthanasia allows people to be free from physical pain. It is the hastening of death of a patient to prevent further sufferings (Euthanasia Revisited). The
religious argument states God chooses when human life ends. Euthanasia also causes mental suffering because they are in physical pain or they are
experiencing with terminal illness. It is a debatable issue. There are many different opinions on Euthanasia. The topic that I am researching is
Euthanasia. There are many different arguments for and against Euthanasia. The four main types of arguments used by people who are against
Euthanasia are the religious argument, the 'slippery slope' argument, the medical ethics argument, and the alternative argument (Euthanasia and assisted
suicide–Argument. The pragmatic argument and the ethical argument are the two main types of arguments used to support the practice of Euthanasia
and assisted suicide (Euthanasia and assisted suicide– Argument. The ethical argument is that people should have the freedom of choice to say if they
want euthanasia or not. The pragmatic argument is for euthanasia. . In addition, that is the definition of the topic. This is what makes the topic
interesting. What makes this topic

Euthanasia Ends Suffering Essay examples
Euthanasia Ends Suffering
Death is deeply personal, generally feared, and wholly inescapable, but medical technology now can prolong our biological existence virtually
indefinitely, and, with these advances, comes the question of whether we should pursue the extension of life in all cases. Most people would agree
that, under certain circumstances, it would be preferable to cease our hold on life. Nearly everyone can agree that there are situations when terminally
ill patients have the right to call for a halt to life–extending treatments, and that their physicians will have the moral obligation to comply. What appears
to be quite difficult for us as a society to come to terms with is the thought that someone would...show more content...
Perry was kept alive long enough for his critical injuries to heal, allowing him to recover the ability to breath unassisted once weaned off a respirator.
This means that he will continue to live, if one can call his existence living, for years to come. Perry's mother, who refused the suggestion of "letting
him die" while her son was comatose, acknowledges that he would not have wanted to live in his present condition. She refused the suggestion of
letting him die while he was comatose, by her own admission, because she could not accept the guilt she felt at the thought of his slow death from
starvation (which is the commonly accepted, and legally permissible, form of passive euthanasia). Had the more humane option of active euthanasia
been available, she would have chosen that path for her son. When one sees Perry, one has to ask in whose best interest was it that he was saved?
What possible good can be said to have been achieved in prolonging the existence of someone who can no longer even realize what the word "life"
means? Our society needs to examine the reason why one type of euthanasia is condoned where another form, often less brutal, is refused. Certain
clarifications are necessary before discussion can begin on whether there truly is a moral difference

Essay Pro Euthanasia
When someone is inevitably dying and in inexplicable pain is it really a crime to grant their wishes and end their suffering? As of right now
euthanasia is illegal in many countries and is a very controversial topic. Is it compassion for the patient helping them in ending their life or murder?
The doctor is not giving death as an option, it is the patients choice and even where it is legal there are many rules. Euthanasia should not be considered
a crime because the patient is not being murdered; they are having their suffering end in a painless, humane way out of compassion for the patient and
their family.
Euthanasia is defined by the World Book Millennium 2000 encyclopaedia as, "the practise of painlessly ending the lives of people...show more content...
The reason to legalize euthanasia is clear, these people need to have the choice to die with dignity.
Dr. Jack Kevorkian more commonly known as Dr. Death is greatly known for his opinion that euthanasia should be legalized and his work with
patients seeking help. He was very important in showing euthanasia and voicing his opinion on the subject so the public could not ignore the
importance of the matter. Dr. Kevorkian was said to have been involved with 130 suicides by patients who wanted to end their own lives (Nicol and
Wylie 17). He had two machines he used to help the patients, one an injection and the other a mask, however both machines were operated by the
patient and although Dr. Kevorkian was taken to court many times for these he was not convicted because the patient was in control. He was very
careful as to not actually commit the act himself until he was contacted by Thomas Youk, a young with Lou Gheric's disease; Lou Gheric's disease is
when the muscle stop working and eventually the patient chokes to death. Tom's condition prevented him from actually operating the machines and
therefore Dr. Kevorkian decided that he would operate the machine himself because he cared greatly about all his patients and could not let Tom live in
his constant fear (Nicol and Wylie 11). Dr. Kevorkian taped Tom's wishes and then himself hooking up the machine and pushing the button to inject the
drugs. He then proceed to

Thesis Statement On Euthanasia
ROOTS MILLENIUM SCHOOLS
Euthanasia: Interfering with life and death?
Amal Sikandar Ranjha
Table of Contents
1.Introduction.................................................................... 3
2.Thesis............................................................................... 4
3.Types of euthanasia....................................................... 4
4.Literature........................................................................ 5
5.Conclusion....................................................................... 7
6.Acknowledgements........................................................ 7 Introduction
From cloning to genetically modified food to designer babies, humans have long been known to interfere with the way nature does things; humans have
been modifying genes and improving the outlook in the pretext that it improves the quality of our lives. Humans also have a long history of interfering
with and trying to control the more divine...show more content...
The prevalent human ethics have made this topic enormous and highly controversial to its core. People around the globe have opposing views as to
what Euthanasia is, and whether it should be allowed or should the practitioners of euthanasia be punished. The National Health Service in the UK has
declared it illegal to help someone take their life whatever the circumstances may be.
The one name that comes up most frequently when talking about Euthanasia is Dr. Jack Kevorkian, also sometimes referred to as Dr. Death. He made
it his mission to travel across the United States of America, at his own expense, to help the people who considered that their lives were not worth
living anymore and assist them in committing suicide. Most of the times, due to extensive suffering, most patients simply give up; with no hope left,
they start to believe that the only way out of interminable pain and discomfort is to give up on their lives. Utter hopelessness makes them highly
vulnerable and at the same time impulsive too. So, they easily fall victim to the temptation of ending up their own lives with just little assistance from
people like Dr.

Essay on Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia
Assisted suicide brings a debate that involves professional, legal and ethical issues about the value of the liberty versus the value of life. However,
before conceive an opinion about this topic is necessary know deeply its concept. Assisted suicide is known as the act of ending with the life of a
terminal illness patients for end with their insupportable pain. Unlike euthanasia, the decision is not made by the doctor and their families, but by the
patient. Therefore, doctors should be able to assist the suicide of their patients without being accused of committing a criminal offense. This conception
is supported by three points of view. The first point defenses the autonomy of people, which covers the right of people to make decision...show more
content...
In conclusion, assisted suicide is supported by the right of people to make decision about their life provided the patient is in the right mental state to do
it.
Another reason to legalize assisted suicide is the empathy for our fellow. For some people who suffer chronic pain or terminal illnesses, suicide is a
more ethical and respectable solution than suffer great pain until the day of their death, whereby people should have the obligation to relieve their
suffering and respect their dignity. Even if take a life should be considered immoral, let patients suffer during the remaining time of life, with no hope
of a better future or alleviating the pain will end is inhumane. People judge assisted suicide according to how much pain and suffering patient are
suffering. However, there are differences between pain and suffering. While pain is an objective concept that can be measured, suffering is a
subjective idea that cannot be measured (Ezekiel, 1999). The impossibility to measure the level of suffering open another question of how to know if
assisted suicide is justified when only the patient know his grade of suffering. In this instance, the weight relapses in the patient decision again.
Allowing assisted suicide society is preventing future terrible experiences that will convert the last days of patient life in torture. Studies of

Euthanasia Essay examples
Euthanasia is often called "mercy killing". It is intentionally making someone die, rather than allowing that person to die naturally. It is sometimes the
act of ending someone's life, who is terminally ill, or is suffering in severe pain. Euthanasia is mostly illegal in the world today. Euthanasia can be
considered a form of suicide, if the person afflicted with the problem actively does it. The person volunteering to commit the act to that person can also
consider it a form of murder.
The positive side of Euthanasia is that it ends a person's suffering in this world. Many physicians and psychiatrists believe that it may a humane act.
From a virtue ethics point of view, it may be appropriate. What we seek inhuman existence is to be...show more content...
The benefits are numerous in that the person euthanized would cease suffering, and the families would begin the healing process from grief and/or
depression from the situation.
From Mill's perspective, the person volunteering for euthanasia has a liberty to do what he/she wants. Mill has written that if the person does not
cause harm to others, it is the person's right, or liberty, to do what they please. If a person wants euthanasia, then that person has the sole liberties to
choose such an act, and depart society and life. Nobody is being other than the person wishing it, and it is a volunteered act.
Brandt argues for approval of euthanasia, but killing human beings is wrong, because it injures that person and goes against the preferences of
self–preservation. However, Brandt says that the above is not present in the issue of euthanasia, so it may be permissible. Brandt says that not all
killing is injury, so not all killing is wrong. One should pay attention to one's expressed wishes he says. Euthanasia could be considered doing a person
a favor, because you cannot injure something if you are relieving it of pain.
The negative side of euthanasia is that it goes against natural law ethics, because we do not let nature take its course. We are disturbing what is
occurring or happening naturally to the person. Every person has a natural inclination to continue living. It is also said

Euthanasia Essay
Here is another essay for you to use! It's alittle screwed up, but perhaps you can do something with it. It was a lot worse than this, it had strange
marks all over it and the paragraphs were everywhere. I fixed it a bit, but I would go crazy if I stared at a computer screen any more!!!! Euthanasia, is
one of the most controversial issues of our time.
This diver issue raises many questions such as: how should decisions be made, and by whom? What should be determined as a matter of law and what
left a matter of discretion and judgment? Should those who want to die, or who are in a "persistent vegetative state" be allowed to die
voluntarily? Who should decide: the patient, the physician, the courts, or the families? The...show more content...
"Wickett, The Right To Die (Harper & Row, Publishers,1986) p. 109. Paul D. Simmons declares bluntly that "it is harder morally to
justify letting somebody die a slow and ugly death, dehumanized, than it is to justify helping him to escape from such misery.
Samuel Gorovitz, Drawing The Line: Life, Death, and Ethical Choices in an American Hospital (Oxford University Press, 1991) p.113.В® Some
very prominent people are making packs with friends or relatives that specify that either will help the other die when life becomes desperate from
pain or tragic accident. Families and physicians feel a variety of powerful emotions when dealing with a patient dying a slow and agonizing death.
Certainly they wish that the pain were relieved and that health restored; that the patient not die but go on living and sharing concerns and joys
together. "When the illness is terminal and there is no hope of relief or recovery, however, death is often desired for the patient as God's
appointed way to relieve suffering." Paul D.
Simmons, Birth and Death: Bioethical Decision Making (The Westminster Press, 1986) p.116. Mr. Sorestad, my junior high teacher, shared his
experience at the death of his beloved wife after her prolonged battle with breast cancer. She had deteriorated physically and mentally practically beyond

Euthanasia Position Paper: The Right to Choose Death with Dignity

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Buy Cheap Papers Online The University of Texas at Austin

More from Buy Cheap Papers Online The University of Texas at Austin (6)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Euthanasia Position Paper: The Right to Choose Death with Dignity