Persuasive Essay On The Iraq War

Persuasive Essay On The Iraq War
The U.S. military is the largest and most powerful military in the history of the world. When the U.S. must use this military might to invade another
country, the President and senior elected officials have a responsibility to ensure the reasoning behind the invasion is ironclad and as transparent as
possible. War should be a last resort, and those in the position of power need exhaust all diplomatic channels first. Unfortunately this powerful sense of
duty was not abided by during the lead up to the Iraq invasion. Senior officials in the Bush administration deliberately deceived the public by using
manipulative and inaccurate intelligence information in order to gain public approval for the invasion of Iraq. Trusted elected officials betrayed the
oath to their office. Callously and recklessly caused the loss of life to members of our military, and innocent civilians in Iraq. Officials in the Bush
administration need to be held legally accountable for the grave harm their deception caused. Former President George Bush and senior officials in the
Bush administration should stand trial for violating the law under US code title 18 section 2441: war crimes, because of the craven duplicity,
unparalleled corruption, and horrific crimes they committed against humanity. As early as 2001, senior officials in the Bush
administration began to plan the invasion of Iraq
and how to mislead the public into supporting the war. However, the horror of September 11th, 2001
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Iraq War Essay
The 9/11 terroist attacks prompted the Iraq War, an invassion led by the United States in 2003 in attempts to maintain international hegemony. The 9
/11 attacks was viewed as a way to justly invade Iraq and overthrow Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein who threatned one of the U.S' vital economic
component, oil. The main goal of the invasion in Iraq was to outs the radical leader Saddam Hussein and institutionalize democracy, law and order in
the country. The U.S failed to plan properly for the aftermath of the regime change. This led to the outbreak of insurgents in Iraq and an attempt for the
United States to promote stability in the nation by their counter–insurgency efforts. The Iraq War sparked by the 9/11 attacks led to the outbreak of Iraqi
...show more content...
Prior to the Iraqi invasion, the country under the radical leader Saddam Hussein, despite the Kuwait Invasion by Iraq led to the downfal of the Iraqi
economy. The Gulf War of 1991 was damaging for both Kuwait and Iraq, however Hussein remained in power despite his harsh treatment of the Kurds.
During the Gulf War, the state of Iraq suffered economic sanctions from the United States which devasted the nation and left many people unhappy
with the regime. Furthermore, the sanctions imposed on Iraq also negatively impacted its people as there was an increase in malnuitrition. " Therefore,
the imposition of sanctions post–1990 had a particularly severe effect on Iraq's economy and food security levels of the population. The State of the
World's Children Report, 1997 (UNICEF) states that the per capita income in Iraq dropped from $3510 in 1989 to $450 in 1996. The average salary
dropped to 3 to 6 US dollars per month by 1999, largely due to a rapid depreciation of the Iraqi dinar" (Sen, B, 2003). The country was to experience
more instability after the U.S invasion in 2003. The invasion conducted by the United States, led the state into a state of instability. As the regime
change made Iraqis unhappy, they destroyed infrastruture and began

Essay on The Iraq War
What triggered the Iraq War that we are currently still having? During this time in history we were still in the cold war as well Cold War (1945–1991),
a lot of events has happened during this time period. I am going to start with the Iran–Iraq war which started in 1980 and ended in 1988. The war began
when Iraq invaded Iran, launching a simultaneous invasion by air and land into Iranian territory on 22 September 1980 following a long history of
border disputes, and fears of Shia insurgency among Iraq's long–suppressed Shia majority influenced by the Iranian Revolution. (Wikipedia, Iran–Iraq
War, 2011). This war had at least a million and half casualties and it severely damaged both their economies, the Iran–Iraq war conflict is often...show
more content...
Thus, the US government had the time to cultivate a plan to remove him from power that was agreeable to all involved. One must examine the fine
points of each argument that the administration had proposed for the immediacy of war in order to best refute them. The first and often most repeated
argument that Saddam Hussein posed a direct threat to the United States is that he possessed weapons of mass destruction. I am willing to concede that
the Iraqi military possessed both chemical and biological agents. Saddam Hussein had stockpiles of them that were never accounted for after the first
Gulf War. He has even used them on several occasions on Kurdish minorities in Northern Iraq. However, no proof was ever offered that he possessed
nuclear weapons or the means to develop them in the near future.
Chemical and biological agents can certainly inflict devastating damage on a country's population. However, what is the likelihood the Saddam
Hussein would have used them on the United States or even our allies in the region? Recent history demonstrates that it was not very likely. Up until
the first Gulf War, Iraq was an ally, in some sense of the word, of the United States. The US government supported Saddam Hussein in his battle with
Iran because we opposed the Shi'a fundamentalists in Tehran. We gave Hussein, through American contractors, many of the chemical agents we

Argumentative Essay On Iraq War
The Iraqi war
The Iraqi war was highly unjustified, the imposition of the American forces in the Iraqi soil was uncalled for, and it bred a lot of hostility between the
Middle East and the United states that resulted in acts of terrorism against the United States. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi people were killed
including civilians
The reason for the invasion of Iraq was that they were suspected of harboring weapons of mass destruction and they were a potential threat to world
peace. However no evidence has ever been found of the existence of such weapons in Iraq and this brought a lot of criticism on the US. This was
however not the first altercation the US has been involved in in the Gulf war they fought with Iraq in order to protect their oil interests in the gulf
region. The united states in the past has been known for going to war to protect is economic interests from the second world war, to the Vietnam War
to the Korean War. All was aimed to protect the economic superiority of the United States. The resolution that brought the gulf war to an end put
Sadam Hussein in power and thereafter he failed to follow some compliances the United Nations had imposed and in 2003 the Us led a coalition of
forces aimed to remove Sadam Hussein from power and it was successful as he was executed 3 years later. This however started war in the country
with the people bring opposed to the occupying forces and the new government that was in place. They also had additional reasons for

The Iraqi War Essay
The Iraqi War
In March of 2003 George W. Bush declared war on Iraq. The war against this country was expected to be a quick victory for the United States. Sure
enough, in May of 2003 Bush declared an end to major operations in Iraq. The United States had taken the country from Saddam Hussein with little
resistance. Americans were mixed in the approval of the use of force, and their doubts of Bush's faults were boosted when no weapons of mass
destruction were discovered. However, during the war, the United States suffered a very small number of human casualties. Since Bush declared the
end of major military operations, more than 150 U.S. soldiers have lost their lives in occupied Iraq. This number is much higher than the total of...show
more content...
On November 3rd the U.S. suffered the biggest military loss of life since the end of major operations. On that day a U.S. Chinook helicopter was
gunned down, killing sixteen soldiers who were on their way back to the United States for a short leave (Tran). That number has certainly grown since
then, and will continue to grow until the U.S. occupation is over.
The U.S. involvement in Iraq has cost the U.S. over 150 casualties since the end of major operations. The war began with the Bush administration's
decision that Saddam Hussein needed to be taken out of power, and power in Iraq should be handed to its people. When war began Americans
expected Saddam's forces to fall will little resistance, and to some effect they did. Within a few months the war ended, and Hussein fled the
country. Many Iraqi citizens rejoiced in the fall of tyranny and rise of a future democracy. Not every Iraqi felt joy when learning about the fall of
Hussein. These people soon became the terrorists that are now causing more and more American troops to lose their lives. These attackers will never
stop until Iraq is free from the United States' control. Despite the attacks, and the massive loss of American life, Bush keeps telling the world that
America will never back down (Stevenson). The fact is that America cannot back down. If the occupation of Iraq were to end today Iraq would fall
under the reign of Hussein once again. Bush has no

Essay On Iraq War
The post 9/11 conflict in Iraq and the undeclared war in Vietnam both had a profound impact on the United States. These two military conflicts have
been a source of contention among the American public for decades. These wars became tedious as a result of their longevity, both the Vietnam War
and the war in Iraq lasted for almost a decade, and according to the US Department of Defense and Time magazine, those wars cost upwards of 100
billion dollars each. Another similarity between the Vietnam War and the war in Iraq is the high number of causalities. The Vietnam War has an
estimated 1,353,000 casualty count that includes allied military deaths, NVA/VC military deaths, and civilians that died from both North andSouth
Vietnam, from years 1965...show more content...
According to the Hoover Institution, a research institution supported by Stanford University, in the beginning of the Vietnam War, the objective was to
prevent the Viet Cong guerrillas from overthrowing the South Vietnamese government. However, the article points out that by 1968, president
Johnson had lost sight of any objective he had previously. While in office President Bush sought total victory in Iraq, which he defined as building the
Iraqi society into a stable democracy. In contrast, President Obama's objective was to remove US troops from Iraq. These wars also had different
military strategies. In Vietnam from 1965 to mid–1968, American troops focused on killing as many of North Vietnamese soldiers and Viet Cong
guerrillas as the could, with the hopeful end result of them quitting. In Iraq the primary commission of American soldiers was not to kill, but to instead
provide security to the population, assist local officials to persuade the people to support the government, fund tens of thousands of development
projects and to institute the Western rule of

The Iraq War Essay examples
Although severe consequences come with the decision of war with Iraq, most blinded United States of America citizens are still yet persuaded to
support such a war. The Bush Administration has covered their schemes of war with lies to gain support. While weapons of mass destruction is
supposedly the reason why the United States launched military action to begin with, all the clearly ignored consequences will haunt their final decision
of war, and will remind them how the war is not and never was justified. Whither the war is for the protection of the United States and their alliances, or
for oil production and the spread of democracy, the United States is only intensifying the aggression of the situation. The Bush Administration's plan
...show more content...
Bush, unaware of the extending consequences and the simple reason of war. Bush blinds the United Sates of reality, while pointing his finger towards
Iraq in blame. "Previously the United States has always been sociable with brutal dictators such as Saddam Hussein, as long as it was a financial
advantage to America" (Zinn). Now that Saddam seems to be the only dictator afoot, the United States ironically takes action (Zinn). However
Saddam was blamed for Sept. 11th, despite of all the evidence that clearly revealed that Saddam had nothing to do with the terrorists attack of that day.
Nevertheless, if Saddam would have been connected to the assault of 9/11, still yet, the United States has no justification for war with Iraq, for the
fault of one dictator. Hopefully the Bush Administration would not consider using the fear of the remembered day of 2001 to gain the necessary
support of war (Walton). On the other hand, the Bush Administration claims the whole aim of the operation in Iraq was not to only disarm Iraq, but to
stop the dangerous spread of weapons of mass destruction through the military force (Schell). Although the support of many U.S.A. citizens is weak,
President Bush insists "We muchs prevent the terrorists and regimes who seek chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons from threatening the United
States and the world (Schell). President Bush also mentions how we will "not permit" (Schell) Iraq to
possess such weapons. However, for the United States to

The Iraqi War Essay
The Iraqi War
This is a discursive essay for the argument against America going to war with Iraq. In this essay, I will briefly include a summary about Iraq and go
on to give evidence about previous incidents and other significant points that finally led to the war.
Iraq is a dictatorship that was under the rule of the tyrant Saddam Hussein until the coalition forces invaded and toppled the Iraqi regime. Saddam
Hussein officially became a dictator in the year 1979. Since then, he has caused many disruptions and has terribly ruled Iraq. Saddam was supported by
the military of Iraq and he was a really brutal man. The people of Iraq were tortured and murdered under this dictator.
There...show more content...
The cease–fire was announced on February 28 1991. This was two days after the allied troops had taken control of Kuwait. On March 2 1991, the
UN Security Council laid down a condition that Iraq had to destroy all weapons of mass destruction and paying back damages to Kuwait. The war
aims of the US were achieved as Kuwait was liberated from Iraq and peace settled into the Kuwaiti region.
America started getting more curious on the disposal of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. In 1993, Iraq attempted to assassinate the former President
George Bush in Kuwait. America then responded a month later by attacking Iraqi military headquarters in Baghdad. There was always a sign that Iraq
were either having or developing these harmful weapons and that Saddam was always capable of using these weapons.
Although Iraq withdrew from Kuwait in 1991, the war between Iraq and America was always there. They call it the "war on terrorism". America
wanted to get rid of Saddam Hussein's regime and restore Iraq to the people of Iraq. There were people who hated Saddam but were forced to
respect him. Any one who goes against him would be slaughtered, buried alive or tortured in the meanest way. America was then worried about the
safety of its people and world peace. "Would the world be safe with a regime like that in existence?"
Over the years, America

The War in Iraq Essay
The War in Iraq
The war in Iraq is a controversy clouded with misinformation and confusion. To get a proper view of the war we need to step back and examine both
sides, pro–war and anti–war, of the facts leading to the war, execution of the war, and the effects of the war.
President Bush's premise for going to war was to prevent potential weapons of mass destruction, specifically nuclear weapons, and not only to destroy
current weapons, as the opposition to the war states. The Gulf War in 1991 ended when Saddam Hussein agreed to destroy chemical and biological
weapons that the United States had seen and which Saddam admitted ownership of. In multiple resolutions with the United...show more content...
He supported and funded many terrorists camps and suicide bombers connected to Al–Quida, whom were responsible for attack on the World Trade
Centers. One other reason that the opponents claim we went to war was "Oil for War". There is truth to this argument. The United States was
protecting its own interest and economy by protecting Kuwait, our ally, in 1991 when Iraq invaded Kuwait to take over their oil fields. There's nothing
wrong with that.
The opposition to the war said that the United States would lose face and credibility in the eyes of the world by going in alone. The United States
didn't go in alone. There was a coalition of 39 countries who participated in the war, including Italy, Spain, Australia, and Japan.
Once the war was underway, the opponents of the war stated that the United States was unjustly invading and occupying Iraq and killing innocent
people. The troops who served in Iraq at the time say that the vast majority of the Iraqi people cheered and welcomed their presence and still continue
to do so. The main reason for this was that Saddam had been terrorizing his own people through murder, rape, and torture, often without provocation.
While Saddam's regime reigned, the people lived in fear.
A small majority of Americans state that they support our troops in Iraq but don't

War in Iraq Essay
War in Iraq
Picture this, you, in a 3rd world country, no friends no family for thousands of miles, hungry, not feeling so well, tired, exhausted and being forced to
fight thousands of people who want you out of there country? Fun? I wouldn't think so... This is a reality for thousands of American Soldiers stationed in
Iraq and maybe your reality if the draft is reinstated. Now, picture this. You're watching the news, they are calling out birthdays, oh they choose yours,
but uh oh this is for a draft. You are now being shipped over to Iraq to fight with out choice. Easy as that. But what are you fighting for? Freedom,
safety, your country? Maybe... But the war is costing your home country 140 billion dollars so...show more content...
Too much money on something so pointless.
Pointless? Yes pointless. Do you remember why we originally went to war with Iraq? Bush told us they had weapons of mass destruction. Do
they? No. Why are we still there? I don't know... do you? After searching Iraq for weapons and coming up empty handed George Bush decided he
did not like Sadam Hussein and the world would be much safer with out him so he attacks. He did not even have the support of the European Union.
Opposing countries included France, Germany, Russia, Greece, Belgium and Belarus. He is now trying to make Iraq a democracy, like the American
government, which is not a bad idea at all. There is just way too much opposition from Iraq, they obviously do not want it, let them have there
dictatorship, it is not our problem. This is a useless war now. We do have to give credit to the many countries that helped us by sending in there own
troops to Iraq. Mainly England, Italy and Poland who sent a combined total of almost 15,000 troops to the 130,000 America sent. Unfortunately there
are casualties.
Casualties include over 1000 American deaths and 7722 wounded American's in Iraq. What about the Iraqi people? Are they cooperating? Nope, so
far around 15,000 have been killed 30% of the deaths were civilians. This is not right for Bush to do. He should not be in Iraq killing that many people

Iran–Iraq War, An Iraqi soldier carrying an AK
–47 assault rifle during the Iran–Iraq War.
[Credit: © Jacques Pavlovsky/Corbis](1980–88), prolonged military conflict between Iran and Iraq during the 1980s. Open warfare began on Sept. 22,
1980, when Iraqi armed forces invaded western Iran along the countries' joint border, though Iraq claimed that the war had begun earlier that month, on
September 4, when Iran shelled a number of border posts. Fighting was ended by a 1988 cease–fire, though the resumption of normal diplomatic
relations and the withdrawal of troops did not take place until the signing of a formal peace agreement on Aug. 16, 1990.
The roots of the war lay in a number of territorial and political disputes between Iraq and...show more content...
Iran's counterattacks using the revolutionary militia (Revolutionary Guards) to bolster its regular armed forces began to compel the Iraqis to give
ground in 1981. The Iranians first pushed the Iraqis back across Iran's KДЃrЕ«n River and then recaptured Khorramshahr in 1982. Later that year Iraq
voluntarily withdrew its forces from all captured Iranian territory and began seeking a peace agreement with Iran. But under the leadership of Ruhollah
Khomeini, who bore a strong personal animosity toward б№ўaddДЃm, Iran remained intransigent and continued the war in an effort to overthrow the
Iraqi leader. Iraq's defenses solidified once its troops were defending their own soil, and the war settled down into a stalemate with a static, entrenched
front running just inside and along Iraq's border. Iran repeatedly launched fruitless infantry attacks, using human assault waves composed partly of
untrained and unarmed conscripts (often young boys snatched from the streets), which were repelled by the superior firepower and air power of the
Iraqis. Both nations engaged in sporadic air and missile attacks against each other's cities and military and oil installations. They also attacked each
other's oil–tanker shipping in the Persian Gulf, and Iran's attacks on Kuwait's and other Gulf states' tankers prompted the United States and several
western European nations to station warships in the Persian Gulf to ensure the flow of oil to the rest of the world.
The oil–exporting capacity of both

Iraqi Civil War Essay
The self–proclaimed Islamic State of Iraq and Syria has emerged in the aftermath of the U.S invasion of Iraq in 2003. The U.S military occupation
of Iraq, the removal of Saddam Hussein and their aftermaths are at the heart of the rise of extremism in the regions of Iraq, Syria and Libya. After the
removal of Saddam Hussein from power in 2003 and the creation of the U.S–backed Malaki government, the Iraqis Sunnis felt that they were
politically marginalized and started rebelling against the structural changes happening in their country. In 2004, Al Zarqawi a Jordanian–born and
leader of the jihadist group Jama'at al Tawhid w'al Jihad formed Al Qaeda inIraq (AQI) in collaboration with Al Qaeda and its leader, Bin Laden. The
"shiafication" of the Iraqi government and the presence of U.S military are the two main reasons for Iraqi–Sunni...show more content...
While rebranding the group as the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), Abu Ayyub al
–Masri used his detention network to recruit and radicalize Iraqi–Sunni
during his governance. Following his death in 2010, Abu Bakr al Baghdadi assumes the leadership of the group and will shortly benefit from political
and military events shattering the region. The political instability in Syria soon led to the beginning of its civil war, when simultaneously the U.S
military exit from Iraq. By unifying Sunni Muslims in Iraq and Syria, the self–proclaimed caliph Abu Bakr al–Baghdadi has benefited from the
political, economic and social exclusion of Sunni in Iraq after the U.S invasion and from the civil war that exploded in Syria in 2013. Under these
circumstances, Abu Bakr al Baghdadi consolidates and mobilizes Sunni Muslim in the region to officially establish the caliphate and rebrand ISI the
Islamic State of Iraq and Syria/ the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS/ISIL) in

Iran-Iraq War Essay
Iran–Iraq War
The eight year Iran–Iraq War was, by the standards of international conflicts, a very long one. It lasted longer than both World War I and World War II.
In this conflict, the two most powerful states in the Persian Gulf, Iran and Iraq, who were the world's largest producers of petroleum, were locked in
mortal combat and appeared intent on destroying each other. The war began whenIraq invaded Iran, simultaneously launching an invasion by air and
land into Iranian territory on September 1980 and ended with a United Nations brokered ceasefire in 1988. The causes of the war are deeply rooted in
the ideology and ambitions of the leaders of the countries to gain and maintain control over internal and regional politics, as well...show more content...
Moreover, what had formerly been the Imperial Iranian military was greatly despoiled, with much of the officer corps fleeing the Islamic Revolution.
Also radical Marxists were still battling the religious fundamentalists in part of the country. Because of all of the above factors, Iraq had a uniquely
promising chance to strike a devastating blow at its eastern neighbor, establishing Saddam as the pre–eminent leader in the Persian Gulf region and
perhaps so discrediting the new Iranian government as to bring about its ultimate downfall.Saddam also wanted to put an end to religious propaganda
directed against Iraq's secular regime by the Islamic government of Iran, which had come to power in 1979 under Khomeini. Khomeini, and during the
Iranian Revolution, and most Iranian Muslims belonged to the Shiite sect of Islam. Hussein feared that the propaganda would undermine the loyalty of
Iraqi Shiites, who comprised about 60 percent of his country's population. On March 1980, Saddam received a pretext to engage in war when an
assassination attempt was made on Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz, by Iranian–backed rebel group Al Dawaa, followed by the bombing on the
funeral procession. Saddam blamed the Iranians and attacked in September. Before declaring war Saddam, in a statement addressed to the Iraqi
parliament, on 17 September, stated that "The

The War Of Iraq War Essay
Baghdad in 2006 was a place of bias, controversy, and terror. The capital of Iraq was shaking not only by their new government that reflected
dealmaking not meritocracy but, also with an internal religious struggle that was peaking with seventy or more deaths a day. Death was far too easy in
Iraq, the United States was in the search for the for the best approach in a hostile environment where the identity of the enemy is masked by the
surrounding civilians. The pending question that comes from the war in Iraq war, What is the right approach to for the U.S. military to take in Baghdad.
When the Bush Administration took a look at their current state they were in and they found three approaches that were all very different. To get out,
to hand over Iraq back to the people after stabilizing it, and the surge were the options that the President and his advisors had to choose from. Three
options were brought up to the Bush Administration. The first approach was brought up and supported by the Iraq Study Group as well as Bush's
new Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates. It can be stated quite simply, Get out of Iraq. This approach may not have been the most ideal but, in
Baghdad 2006 was a deadly time for all people involved since enemy attacks had risen a third higher than the year before. Major controversy was also
going down within the US military regarding the question of who the enemies were. The unknown frightened many because it was a clear flashback to
Vietnam, as well it

Consequences of the Iraq War Essay
War in Iraq, which was launched by the United States and the United Kingdom on March 20, 2003 and continues to the present, was intended to be a
preventative war against terrorism and Weapons of Mass Destruction, as president Bush repeatedly claimed that "these weapons posed a significant and
timely threat to the United States and its allies." As a matter of fact, the things that considered Iraq as a threat to global welfare had not been discovered,
and in spite of the common thought that this war will produce many advantageous consequences, it certainly caused a greater number of unfortunate
ones.
First, the war on Iraq has cost the lives of almost two thousand of "Coalition of the willing" soldiers in addition to...show more content...
Also, it will definitely drain the economy of every member of the Coalition, and the US' most of all. It is known, that the largest oilfields are located
on the Iraq territory, and as a result of the invasion, the oil supply from Iraq to the global market was shot, which raised oil prices making it not
beneficial for the world's economy as well.
Third, due to the constant growth of opposition and terrorist attack, the American Democracy itself most likely will go through serious changes. Our
freedom will be limited as our government continues to ensure the nation's security. Additionally, it is obvious that terror of Islamic extremists, which
is really a major threat not only to our country, but to the entire world, will rise sharply, causing more deaths and distraction. It is just impossible to
fight terrorism the way we do it.
Liberal nations will continue to abjure such attacks; aggressive and inhumane regimes have never observed such self–imposed moral limitations and
never will. (Clark, 34)
Last, but not least, this war also caused a reputational consequence for the US around the world, which will make our relationships with other countries
more complicated and problematic. As they didn't support this war, its outcome only proved that starting it wasn't the right thing to do and its mission
has failed:
If America comes to be viewed by its key democratic

Intervention Of The Iraq War Essay
In the years leading up to and during the Iraq War, the United States pursued a neo–conservative agenda that aimed to dismantle Saddam Hussein's
regime, eliminate the threat of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), and install a democratic government in Iraq. To do so, U.S. policymakers
deployed military forces and diplomatic ambassadors to intervene. This strategy, clearly seen during the early invasion in 2003 and the surge of 2007,
produced mixed reactions. Indeed, more than a decade after the U.S. decision to mediate, the question remains: Can intervention actually work? To
answer this question, it is important to first define what intervention means in the context of Iraq. Intervention involved a combination of military
might, cultural sensitivity, and tactful diplomacy. U.S. military forces engaged in more aggressive offensive maneuvers to subdue Saddam Hussein and
insurgents, while ambassadors advised, often navigating the tenuous relationships between different ethnic groups. With this definition in mind,
intervention was particularly effective in three specific instances throughout the U.S. occupation of Iraq: during the 2003 neutralization of Saddam
Hussein and the successful establishment of the Kirkuk Provincial Council, during the 2007 "Surge", and during the drawdown of U.S. troops from
Iraq. The first of the aforementioned successes, can be best understood by analyzing the early impacts of invasion. During that time, as the main body
of coalition forces

Iraq War Essay examples
The war waged on Iraq by the United States has been the cause of heated debate all over the world. Many people have opposed the United States
attack on Iraq for many viable reasons. Some of these reasons include that it is not in the best interests for the reputation of the United States with the
other nations of the global community, it poses an increased threat to United States homeland security, and it will result in many unjust crimes
committed by the United States.
Going to war with Iraq will negatively affect the reputation of the United States with other countries opposing the war. These countries include
Germany, France, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, and Pakistan, to name...show more content...
Angry nations are more apt to spawn groups of people who feel unsafe, violated, and angry at the actions of the United States. Such people are more
likely to commit terrorist acts in desperation for the injustice they are witnessing. We have already seen the effects of September 11th, 2001, as the
World Trade Center was attacked. Waging this war will only fuel the fire already aimed at the United States from previous generations, and may
encourage more attacks like September 11th.
The final and most important reason for the United States not to wage war against Iraq is that it will cause many war crimes. Wars always involve
taking the lives of innocent people, and many other injustices that can be illustrated if we look to wars fought in the past. First of all, innocent
civilians will be killed. The loss of every innocent life is an injustice and a tragedy. Secondly, after the Persian Gulf War fought from 1990
–1991, the
troops who fought in the war and the people of Iraq developed increased incidences of cancer and birth defects to their newborn children. This was
later found to be due to the radioactivity of the depleted uranium used in the weaponry to fight the war. The current war against Iraq employs the same
weaponry made of the depleted uranium, and will only cause more generations of people with cancer and birth

Iraq War Research Paper
The number half a million is the same number of how many people died from the war in Iraq. The U.S. invaded and occupied Iraq in 2003. This war
started on March 20th and ended on May 1st. The stated reason for the war was that Saddam Hussein,the fifth president of Iraq, had developed
weapons of mass destruction that posed a long–term threat to America. Recognizing the weapons of mass destruction, the U.S. stated that they were a
threat to our security and our international peace was at risk. So former President, George W. Bush, declared war onIraq on March 20th, 2003. As I
stated earlier half a million people died from the war. If the U.S. have not taken action, then imagine how many people could have died if Iraq used
the weapons of mass destruction. So invading Iraq was the best option for the U.S. To start, the weapons and Saddam Hussein were a threat to our
security, our international peace was at risk, and thousands of more...show more content...
This weapon could have killed thousands of lives and destroyed thousands of buildings, and homes. Not to mention Saddam had weapons and used
it that killed innocent lives before. For example, On March 16, 1988, planes pounded the town of Halabja with mustard gas. Mustard gas is a type
of gas that is used in chemical weapons that can cause large blisters on the skin and in the lungs. 5,000 exemplary people died that day and
thousands more died of diseases years after the attack. On top of it, this attack was in Iraq and it was also under Saddam Hussein's order. So that
means, he used weapons against his own people. Saddam used weapons that killed thousands of inculpable lives, so what makes you think he has a
problem with using weapons against the U.S.? This is why the weapons and Saddam Hussein were a threat to our security. Saddam Hussein had
weapons that could of done major damage and he used weapons that killed lives

The Iran-Iraq War Essay
The Iran–Iraq War
While the Iran–Iraq War during the 1980's may have permanently altered the course of progress in Iran and Iraq, the war also altered the resulting
permanent involvement of the rest of the world in the middle–east. The rich and complicated history in Iraq has established numerous cultural and
ethnic traditions that all play a part in where the country is today. The Iran–Iraq War brought into focus some of those traditions and how they
conflicted, while also bringing Iraq and its economic situation into the spotlight. Being on top of some of the most mineral rich soil in the world makes
Iraq a major contributor to the world's economy through petroleum and crude oil exports. This, among other reasons, ties nations...show more content...
The Safavids were the first the first to declare Shia Islam the official religion of Iran, and their interest in Iraq lay in the Shia holy places in central
Iraq, and also the fact that Baghdad held significant symbolic value as the seat of the ancient Abbasid Empire. The Ottoman Empire on the other hand
was afraid that Shia Islam would spread to Asia Minor, and thus looked to control Iraq as a Sunni–dominated buffer state. During the Ottoman period,
the Sunnis were placed in political positions, while the Shias were then shut out of the political process. This divide between the Sunnis and the Shias
continued to be more and more of an important element in the Iraqi social structure, and remains an issue even today. It was also during this time
period that the Kurdish Baban Dynasty emerged and began to organize resistance to the Ottoman rule in Northern Iraq.
Then came the First World War and with it the defeat of the German army and their allies, including Turkey. As a result in 1919, Iraq, as well as
Palestine, came under the control of Great Britain who proceeded to draw out the borders and establish a government that would best suit them. The
years which followed were filled with revolutions, jihad, and unrest, as the British sought to maintain control of a nation with which they knew very
little about.

Persuasive Essay On The Iraq War

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Persuasive Essay On The Iraq War