SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 39
Week 3
SOSE TUTORIAL
Show and Tell
Who has something to share?
Learnings
What have you learnt from the lecture
and readings?
What is inquiry-based learning?
• Combines with a problem-based approach
to discovering the past, present and future
• Starts with students’ prior knowledge
• Not a new concept (as early as 1700s!!)
but met with great resistance.
• Vygotsky’s (1896-1934) work was seen as
an alternative to teacher-dominated
practices
• Furthered by Dewey, Piaget and more
recently Bruner and Bloom.Katherine Main, 2011
Beware of false dichotomies...
Inquiry based learning (all good) –v- teacher
directed learning (all bad)
Katherine Main, 2011
Caution..
Inquiry based learning is not just about
sending a group of students off to the library
to ‘research’, nor is it just about asking them
to ‘do a Google’, or to cut and paste a
Wikipedia entry
YOU need to GUIDE students through the
process.
Katherine Main, 2011
Research has shown
• ‘Minimally guided instruction is less effective
and less efficient than instructional
approaches that place a strong emphasis on
guidance of the student learning processes’.
• Students should not merely be left to their
own devices, nor should they be so carefully
guided by a teacher’s directions that the
inquiry process is little more than a
mechanical filling in of gaps in either a real or
a figurative worksheet.
Katherine Main, 2011
Good practice
....uses restrained and knowledgeable teacher
guidance while simultaneously encouraging
individual student initiatives.
Also,
Knowledge is not divided into subjects and you
cannot properly learning any one thing by
separating it from all other things…
Katherine Main, 2011
Teaching late primary and
adolescent students..
• Assume a fixed past but frequently
question authoritative narratives on topics
such as UFOs and conspiracy theories.
• This natural scepticism should be
successfully developed by the teacher
who guides students away from the
authoritative view and idle speculation
based on suspect evidence and turn them
more towards a forensic, historical
approach.
Katherine Main, 2011
How do you..
• Overcome the unquestioning student?
• Disbelieving student?
• Focus the events/topic under investigation
as a major question and as a problem to
be resolved rather than just outlining the
task as a straightforward assignment –
through an INQUIRY APPROACH
Katherine Main, 2011
Inquiry Approaches
• A number of different approaches that
follow a general sequence of phases that
includes
– framing and focusing questions;
– locating, organising and analysing evidence;
– evaluating, synthesising and reporting
conclusions;
– possibly taking action of some sort;
– reconsidering consequences and outcomes of
each of the above phases.Katherine Main, 2011
Inquiry models
SOSE Syllabus
broad phases of
inquiry
Marsh TELSTAR* Action Research* Integrating
Socially*
Framing and focusing
questions
Tuning In Tune in Identify the
problem/issue
Tuning in
Deciding
directions
Explore Preparing to
find out
Locating, organising and
analysing evidence
Organising
ourselves
Look Investigate the
problem/issue
Finding out
Finding out Sort Evaluate data Sorting out
Evaluating, synthesising
and reporting
conclusions
Sorting out Test List possible actions Going further
Drawing
conclusions
Predict outcomes Making
connections
Select the best
action
Possibly taking action of
some sort
Considering
social actions
Act Implement the
action
Taking action
Reconsidering
consequences and
outcomes of each of the
above phases
Reflection
and
evaluation
Reflect Evaluate the action
Katherine Main, 2011
Marsh’s Model
Phase 1 - Tuning in
– Identifying and defining the issue
• Generate interest
• Establish current knowledge
• Draw on past experiences
• Identify possible aspects for investigating
Katherine Main, 2011
Phase 2: Deciding directions
Deciding directions
Formulation of hypotheses
– Choosing a focus
– Extending the scope
– Identifying and refining questions
Katherine Main, 2011
Phase 3: Organising ourselves
Closely linked to the to the Deciding
Directions phase – it is about organising
and refining the direction the inquiry is to
take.
Katherine Main, 2011
Phase 4: Finding out
• Collecting information – researching using
a range of strategies including
• Excursions
• Guest speakers
• Surveys and interviews
• Film, literature and music
• Magazines, newspapers, books, articles
• Conducting experiments
• Collecting and analysing statistics, maps and
charts
• Evaluating primary sources, case studies etc
Katherine Main, 2011
Phase 5: Sorting out
• This involves analysing the data and
refining the issues
– Organising and presenting data
– Forming or modifying concepts through
classification strategies
– Comparing and contrasting findings
– Discussing the issue and hypotheses
– evaluating
Katherine Main, 2011
Phase 6: Drawing conclusions
• Students should express their
understandings and communicate them to
others, though
– Interpreting information
– Developing and modifying generalisations
– Explaining similarities and differences
– Establishing connections
– Confirming, rejecting or modifying hypotheses
and predictions
– Reformulating propositions
Katherine Main, 2011
Phase 7: Considering social action
• Social action requires students to be
active in decision making during their
inquiry and at its conclusion. This involves:
– Identifying action that could be an outcome of
the inquiry
– Implementing, if appropriate
Katherine Main, 2011
Phase 8: Reflection and Evaluation
• What should be done about this?
• Where to from here?
• Do we need to start the cycle of inquiry
over from this point?
Katherine Main, 2011
Marsh’s Model
Phase 1 - Tuning in
– Identifying and defining the issue
Choose a topic...
Australia and the world
Environmental sustainability
(teacher led)
Katherine Main, 2011
Phase 2: Deciding directions
Deciding directions
Formulation of hypotheses
– Choosing a focus
• What does the “environment” mean?
• What does “sustainability” mean?
• Whose responsibility is it?
• What can we do?
(teacher led – student led)
Katherine Main, 2011
Phase 3: Organising ourselves
Taking on environmental sustainability
(TOES): Is there a better alternative to
carbon trading to protect the planet?
Katherine Main, 2011
Phase 4: Finding out
• Collecting information – researching using
a range of strategies including
• Excursions
• Guest speakers
• Surveys and interviews
• Film, literature and music
• Magazines, newspapers, books, articles
• Conducting experiments
• Collecting and analysing statistics, maps and
charts
• Evaluating primary sources, case studies etc
Katherine Main, 2011
Phase 5: Sorting out
• This involves analysing the data and
refining the issues
– Organising and presenting data
– Forming or modifying concepts through
classification strategies
– Comparing and contrasting findings
– Discussing the issue and hypotheses
– evaluating
Katherine Main, 2011
Phase 6: Drawing conclusions
• Students should express their
understandings and communicate them to
others, though
– Interpreting information
– Developing and modifying generalisations
– Explaining similarities and differences
– Establishing connections
– Confirming, rejecting or modifying hypotheses
and predictions
– Reformulating propositions
Katherine Main, 2011
Phase 7: Considering social action
• Social action requires students to be
active in decision making during their
inquiry and at its conclusion. This involves:
– What social action could be taken?
Katherine Main, 2011
Phase 8: Reflection and Evaluation
• What should be done about this?
• Where to from here?
• Do we need to start the cycle of inquiry
over from this point?
Katherine Main, 2011
• Characteristics of Marsh’s inquiry model
The main purposes involved in developing and implementing Marsh’s inquiry model, are as
follows:
• It aims to promote higher order thinking;
• It moves through stages from simple to more complex thinking processes;
The characteristics of each stage of Marsh’s model are shown below:
• in the Tuning, Deciding Directions, Organising Ourselves, and Finding Out stages:
• activities initiate inquiry and consider the nature and scope of the study
• basic factual information is gathered
• teacher questions are lower order, often closed, numerous
• less complex thinking processes are required e.g. recall, comprehension.
In the Sorting Out and Drawing Conclusions stages:
• activities bring facts together into relationships that are illustrated in practical, visual and/or
concrete ways
• teacher questions are of increasing difficulty, but fewer. They enable students to explain
understanding (Lower order and higher order concepts and generalisations)
• more complex thinking processes are called for, e.g. comparing, contrasting, categorising,
inferring, synthesising, generalising.
In the Considering Social Action stage:
• activities ask students to use their understandings in changed or new settings
• teacher questions are fewer, but they call for very complex thinking processes and
explanations, e.g. hypothesising, predicting, evaluating.
In the Evaluation and Reflect stage:
• activities ask students to review their understanding and the process through which it has
developed and been applied.
• teacher questions are more procedural in style and purpose, stimulating and prompting
students to reflect effectively on their understanding and how it was developed.
The Three Levels of Knowledge
• Facts
• Concepts
• Generalisations
(See handout)
Importance of Questioning
(See handout)
Selecting Essential Learnings &
ACARA K&Us
• Don’t try and find “content specific” ELs –
they are not there for many of the topics;
• Select the parts that you are going to
explicitly teach and assess
• Go for depth rather than breadth –
remember more is not always better.
Katherine Main, 2011
YOUR ASSESSMENT
• Task One: Research Project 30%
• Task Two: Group Presentation 30%
• Task Three: Exam 40%
• Look at the Marsh Model document/
exemplar to help you.
Task One: Research Project
• 1. Choose a topic from the provided list.
• 2. Design a lesson using Marsh's Model of Inquiry
Learning to show how you would teach that topic to an
Upper Primary Class. It may be used in your
presentation and so plan it using a higher order thinking
strategy.
• 3. Write an 1800 word rationale. Your research will
clearly and concisely be structured on Marsh's 8 steps.
You should address only one or two questions (or dot
points) in each of Marsh's columns for his 8 steps.
Prepare your written research project using Marsh's
headings of his 8 steps. You must also reflect on the
value of using an inquiry model in the teaching of social
science.
Extra Elaboration
• The phases of the inquiry are not aligned to individual lessons. For example,
in the finding out stage, you may do three or four lessons and so students
need to respond to a couple of the questions in each phase of the inquiry as
well as give a couple of examples of learning/teaching activities that they
would expect to cover in that phase. We want you to be able to clearly see
the way that an inquiry model drives a unit and how each phase has a
distinct purpose that can be directed through lessons.
• Essay should at some point respond to the 2 questions from that phase of
the inquiry model using the context/content of your chosen topic and then a
couple of dot points explaining learning/teaching activities that you would
do. We need to see you engage in the content - we actually want you to
learn about at least one of the areas in-depth. Phase 8 of the inquiry has
been turned into a reflection on the value of teaching SOSE through
inquiry/HOT/constructivist models - it should be about 600 words and so
needs to draw on literature and relate to their topic as well. Linking it all
together is important.
Task Two: Presentation
• 1. Choose a topic and design a 30 minute lesson
• In groups, prepare and deliver a 30 minute SOSE
lesson. In this Presentation, you will deliver ONE
learning activity that you would implement in SOSE in
the Primary School. Select and model teaching
strategies that are appropriate to the development of the
key concepts or values.
2. Annotated bibliography: You will also select and evaluate
a range of teaching resources (books, videos, teaching
kit, web sites, CD-Rom programs, etc) to support
facilitation of the Workshop.
Let’s Plan!
• WOWs
• • collect and analyse information and evidence from
primary and secondary sources
• • evaluate sources of information and evidence for
relevance, reliability, origins and perspective
• • draw conclusions and make decisions based on
information and evidence by identifying patterns
• and connections
• • communicate descriptions, decisions and conclusions,
using different text types for specific
• purposes and the conventions of research-based texts
• • respond to investigation findings and conclusions by
planning and implementing actions
K&U- Time, Continuity & Change
Australia’s relationship with its Asian and
Pacific neighbours is linked to events over
a range of time periods, including events
associated with the “White Australia”
policy, refugees and immigration, free-
trade agreements and military alliances.
What to do!
• 1. Select outcomes
• 2. Choose a context for learning (TOPIC)
• ( RESEARCH RESOURCES & TALK)
• 3. Make explicit what Ss. need to know and do
• 4. Select strategies to ensure consistency of teacher
judgement.
• 5. Design Assessment (what/how)
• 6. Identify how, when and where judgements will be
made and when progress will be reported on.
• 7.Select and sequence learning activities for individual
students.
• 8. Teach
• 9. Gather and record data via Assessment.

More Related Content

What's hot

Inquiry based teaching
Inquiry based teaching Inquiry based teaching
Inquiry based teaching
Silas Spence
 
Classroom action research
Classroom action researchClassroom action research
Classroom action research
sukong
 
Action research final copy
Action research   final copyAction research   final copy
Action research final copy
Trudy Keil
 
Action research a brief introduction
Action research   a brief introductionAction research   a brief introduction
Action research a brief introduction
upnismedmultimedia
 

What's hot (20)

Collaborative Action Research
Collaborative Action ResearchCollaborative Action Research
Collaborative Action Research
 
Inquiry based teaching
Inquiry based teaching Inquiry based teaching
Inquiry based teaching
 
Action research
Action researchAction research
Action research
 
Action Research for the Reflective Teacher
Action Research for the Reflective TeacherAction Research for the Reflective Teacher
Action Research for the Reflective Teacher
 
Teacher action research
Teacher action researchTeacher action research
Teacher action research
 
Classroom research
Classroom researchClassroom research
Classroom research
 
Classroom action research
Classroom action researchClassroom action research
Classroom action research
 
Action research final copy
Action research   final copyAction research   final copy
Action research final copy
 
Classroom Action Research (about ACT)
Classroom Action Research (about ACT)Classroom Action Research (about ACT)
Classroom Action Research (about ACT)
 
Action research
Action researchAction research
Action research
 
Classroom Action Research
Classroom Action ResearchClassroom Action Research
Classroom Action Research
 
Action research 2013 (2)
Action research 2013 (2)Action research 2013 (2)
Action research 2013 (2)
 
Parts of the action research
Parts of the action researchParts of the action research
Parts of the action research
 
Action research in education 2011
Action research in education 2011Action research in education 2011
Action research in education 2011
 
Action research
Action researchAction research
Action research
 
Action research a brief introduction
Action research   a brief introductionAction research   a brief introduction
Action research a brief introduction
 
Inquiry 2
Inquiry 2Inquiry 2
Inquiry 2
 
Action research
Action researchAction research
Action research
 
Action research
Action researchAction research
Action research
 
Action research-for-teachers
Action research-for-teachersAction research-for-teachers
Action research-for-teachers
 

Similar to Tute 3

Critical thinking: a crisis in the Social Sciences - Angus Nurse (Middlesex U...
Critical thinking: a crisis in the Social Sciences - Angus Nurse (Middlesex U...Critical thinking: a crisis in the Social Sciences - Angus Nurse (Middlesex U...
Critical thinking: a crisis in the Social Sciences - Angus Nurse (Middlesex U...
The Higher Education Academy
 
Sensemaking LS and DL
Sensemaking LS and DLSensemaking LS and DL
Sensemaking LS and DL
Philwood
 

Similar to Tute 3 (20)

Action Research
Action Research Action Research
Action Research
 
Inquiry method of teaching
Inquiry method of teachingInquiry method of teaching
Inquiry method of teaching
 
Developing critical thinking - Angus Nurse
Developing critical thinking - Angus NurseDeveloping critical thinking - Angus Nurse
Developing critical thinking - Angus Nurse
 
Teaching Strategies 1.pptx
Teaching Strategies 1.pptxTeaching Strategies 1.pptx
Teaching Strategies 1.pptx
 
Critical thinking: a crisis in the Social Sciences - Angus Nurse (Middlesex U...
Critical thinking: a crisis in the Social Sciences - Angus Nurse (Middlesex U...Critical thinking: a crisis in the Social Sciences - Angus Nurse (Middlesex U...
Critical thinking: a crisis in the Social Sciences - Angus Nurse (Middlesex U...
 
Sensemaking LS and DL
Sensemaking LS and DLSensemaking LS and DL
Sensemaking LS and DL
 
Jameel 6461 day 1.pdf
Jameel 6461 day 1.pdfJameel 6461 day 1.pdf
Jameel 6461 day 1.pdf
 
Inquiry approach in pedagogy of science
Inquiry approach in pedagogy of scienceInquiry approach in pedagogy of science
Inquiry approach in pedagogy of science
 
Action research
Action researchAction research
Action research
 
Educational research basic Steps
Educational research basic Steps Educational research basic Steps
Educational research basic Steps
 
Inquiry based learning
Inquiry based learningInquiry based learning
Inquiry based learning
 
The inquiry process
The inquiry processThe inquiry process
The inquiry process
 
INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH
INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCHINTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH
INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH
 
2016 Conference - Teachers as researchers
2016 Conference - Teachers as researchers2016 Conference - Teachers as researchers
2016 Conference - Teachers as researchers
 
Qualicum engagement.novpptx
Qualicum   engagement.novpptxQualicum   engagement.novpptx
Qualicum engagement.novpptx
 
New librarian orientation 2015
New librarian orientation 2015New librarian orientation 2015
New librarian orientation 2015
 
Mt research training jr
Mt research training jrMt research training jr
Mt research training jr
 
inquirybased-learning-200926032449.pptx
inquirybased-learning-200926032449.pptxinquirybased-learning-200926032449.pptx
inquirybased-learning-200926032449.pptx
 
2016 leading seagulls 17 rainbow
2016 leading seagulls 17  rainbow 2016 leading seagulls 17  rainbow
2016 leading seagulls 17 rainbow
 
Action Research In Montessori Classrooms
Action Research In Montessori ClassroomsAction Research In Montessori Classrooms
Action Research In Montessori Classrooms
 

Tute 3

  • 2. Show and Tell Who has something to share?
  • 3. Learnings What have you learnt from the lecture and readings?
  • 4. What is inquiry-based learning? • Combines with a problem-based approach to discovering the past, present and future • Starts with students’ prior knowledge • Not a new concept (as early as 1700s!!) but met with great resistance. • Vygotsky’s (1896-1934) work was seen as an alternative to teacher-dominated practices • Furthered by Dewey, Piaget and more recently Bruner and Bloom.Katherine Main, 2011
  • 5. Beware of false dichotomies... Inquiry based learning (all good) –v- teacher directed learning (all bad) Katherine Main, 2011
  • 6. Caution.. Inquiry based learning is not just about sending a group of students off to the library to ‘research’, nor is it just about asking them to ‘do a Google’, or to cut and paste a Wikipedia entry YOU need to GUIDE students through the process. Katherine Main, 2011
  • 7. Research has shown • ‘Minimally guided instruction is less effective and less efficient than instructional approaches that place a strong emphasis on guidance of the student learning processes’. • Students should not merely be left to their own devices, nor should they be so carefully guided by a teacher’s directions that the inquiry process is little more than a mechanical filling in of gaps in either a real or a figurative worksheet. Katherine Main, 2011
  • 8. Good practice ....uses restrained and knowledgeable teacher guidance while simultaneously encouraging individual student initiatives. Also, Knowledge is not divided into subjects and you cannot properly learning any one thing by separating it from all other things… Katherine Main, 2011
  • 9. Teaching late primary and adolescent students.. • Assume a fixed past but frequently question authoritative narratives on topics such as UFOs and conspiracy theories. • This natural scepticism should be successfully developed by the teacher who guides students away from the authoritative view and idle speculation based on suspect evidence and turn them more towards a forensic, historical approach. Katherine Main, 2011
  • 10. How do you.. • Overcome the unquestioning student? • Disbelieving student? • Focus the events/topic under investigation as a major question and as a problem to be resolved rather than just outlining the task as a straightforward assignment – through an INQUIRY APPROACH Katherine Main, 2011
  • 11. Inquiry Approaches • A number of different approaches that follow a general sequence of phases that includes – framing and focusing questions; – locating, organising and analysing evidence; – evaluating, synthesising and reporting conclusions; – possibly taking action of some sort; – reconsidering consequences and outcomes of each of the above phases.Katherine Main, 2011
  • 12. Inquiry models SOSE Syllabus broad phases of inquiry Marsh TELSTAR* Action Research* Integrating Socially* Framing and focusing questions Tuning In Tune in Identify the problem/issue Tuning in Deciding directions Explore Preparing to find out Locating, organising and analysing evidence Organising ourselves Look Investigate the problem/issue Finding out Finding out Sort Evaluate data Sorting out Evaluating, synthesising and reporting conclusions Sorting out Test List possible actions Going further Drawing conclusions Predict outcomes Making connections Select the best action Possibly taking action of some sort Considering social actions Act Implement the action Taking action Reconsidering consequences and outcomes of each of the above phases Reflection and evaluation Reflect Evaluate the action Katherine Main, 2011
  • 13. Marsh’s Model Phase 1 - Tuning in – Identifying and defining the issue • Generate interest • Establish current knowledge • Draw on past experiences • Identify possible aspects for investigating Katherine Main, 2011
  • 14. Phase 2: Deciding directions Deciding directions Formulation of hypotheses – Choosing a focus – Extending the scope – Identifying and refining questions Katherine Main, 2011
  • 15. Phase 3: Organising ourselves Closely linked to the to the Deciding Directions phase – it is about organising and refining the direction the inquiry is to take. Katherine Main, 2011
  • 16. Phase 4: Finding out • Collecting information – researching using a range of strategies including • Excursions • Guest speakers • Surveys and interviews • Film, literature and music • Magazines, newspapers, books, articles • Conducting experiments • Collecting and analysing statistics, maps and charts • Evaluating primary sources, case studies etc Katherine Main, 2011
  • 17. Phase 5: Sorting out • This involves analysing the data and refining the issues – Organising and presenting data – Forming or modifying concepts through classification strategies – Comparing and contrasting findings – Discussing the issue and hypotheses – evaluating Katherine Main, 2011
  • 18. Phase 6: Drawing conclusions • Students should express their understandings and communicate them to others, though – Interpreting information – Developing and modifying generalisations – Explaining similarities and differences – Establishing connections – Confirming, rejecting or modifying hypotheses and predictions – Reformulating propositions Katherine Main, 2011
  • 19. Phase 7: Considering social action • Social action requires students to be active in decision making during their inquiry and at its conclusion. This involves: – Identifying action that could be an outcome of the inquiry – Implementing, if appropriate Katherine Main, 2011
  • 20. Phase 8: Reflection and Evaluation • What should be done about this? • Where to from here? • Do we need to start the cycle of inquiry over from this point? Katherine Main, 2011
  • 21. Marsh’s Model Phase 1 - Tuning in – Identifying and defining the issue Choose a topic... Australia and the world Environmental sustainability (teacher led) Katherine Main, 2011
  • 22. Phase 2: Deciding directions Deciding directions Formulation of hypotheses – Choosing a focus • What does the “environment” mean? • What does “sustainability” mean? • Whose responsibility is it? • What can we do? (teacher led – student led) Katherine Main, 2011
  • 23. Phase 3: Organising ourselves Taking on environmental sustainability (TOES): Is there a better alternative to carbon trading to protect the planet? Katherine Main, 2011
  • 24. Phase 4: Finding out • Collecting information – researching using a range of strategies including • Excursions • Guest speakers • Surveys and interviews • Film, literature and music • Magazines, newspapers, books, articles • Conducting experiments • Collecting and analysing statistics, maps and charts • Evaluating primary sources, case studies etc Katherine Main, 2011
  • 25. Phase 5: Sorting out • This involves analysing the data and refining the issues – Organising and presenting data – Forming or modifying concepts through classification strategies – Comparing and contrasting findings – Discussing the issue and hypotheses – evaluating Katherine Main, 2011
  • 26. Phase 6: Drawing conclusions • Students should express their understandings and communicate them to others, though – Interpreting information – Developing and modifying generalisations – Explaining similarities and differences – Establishing connections – Confirming, rejecting or modifying hypotheses and predictions – Reformulating propositions Katherine Main, 2011
  • 27. Phase 7: Considering social action • Social action requires students to be active in decision making during their inquiry and at its conclusion. This involves: – What social action could be taken? Katherine Main, 2011
  • 28. Phase 8: Reflection and Evaluation • What should be done about this? • Where to from here? • Do we need to start the cycle of inquiry over from this point? Katherine Main, 2011
  • 29. • Characteristics of Marsh’s inquiry model The main purposes involved in developing and implementing Marsh’s inquiry model, are as follows: • It aims to promote higher order thinking; • It moves through stages from simple to more complex thinking processes; The characteristics of each stage of Marsh’s model are shown below: • in the Tuning, Deciding Directions, Organising Ourselves, and Finding Out stages: • activities initiate inquiry and consider the nature and scope of the study • basic factual information is gathered • teacher questions are lower order, often closed, numerous • less complex thinking processes are required e.g. recall, comprehension. In the Sorting Out and Drawing Conclusions stages: • activities bring facts together into relationships that are illustrated in practical, visual and/or concrete ways • teacher questions are of increasing difficulty, but fewer. They enable students to explain understanding (Lower order and higher order concepts and generalisations) • more complex thinking processes are called for, e.g. comparing, contrasting, categorising, inferring, synthesising, generalising. In the Considering Social Action stage: • activities ask students to use their understandings in changed or new settings • teacher questions are fewer, but they call for very complex thinking processes and explanations, e.g. hypothesising, predicting, evaluating. In the Evaluation and Reflect stage: • activities ask students to review their understanding and the process through which it has developed and been applied. • teacher questions are more procedural in style and purpose, stimulating and prompting students to reflect effectively on their understanding and how it was developed.
  • 30. The Three Levels of Knowledge • Facts • Concepts • Generalisations (See handout) Importance of Questioning (See handout)
  • 31. Selecting Essential Learnings & ACARA K&Us • Don’t try and find “content specific” ELs – they are not there for many of the topics; • Select the parts that you are going to explicitly teach and assess • Go for depth rather than breadth – remember more is not always better. Katherine Main, 2011
  • 32. YOUR ASSESSMENT • Task One: Research Project 30% • Task Two: Group Presentation 30% • Task Three: Exam 40% • Look at the Marsh Model document/ exemplar to help you.
  • 33. Task One: Research Project • 1. Choose a topic from the provided list. • 2. Design a lesson using Marsh's Model of Inquiry Learning to show how you would teach that topic to an Upper Primary Class. It may be used in your presentation and so plan it using a higher order thinking strategy. • 3. Write an 1800 word rationale. Your research will clearly and concisely be structured on Marsh's 8 steps. You should address only one or two questions (or dot points) in each of Marsh's columns for his 8 steps. Prepare your written research project using Marsh's headings of his 8 steps. You must also reflect on the value of using an inquiry model in the teaching of social science.
  • 34. Extra Elaboration • The phases of the inquiry are not aligned to individual lessons. For example, in the finding out stage, you may do three or four lessons and so students need to respond to a couple of the questions in each phase of the inquiry as well as give a couple of examples of learning/teaching activities that they would expect to cover in that phase. We want you to be able to clearly see the way that an inquiry model drives a unit and how each phase has a distinct purpose that can be directed through lessons. • Essay should at some point respond to the 2 questions from that phase of the inquiry model using the context/content of your chosen topic and then a couple of dot points explaining learning/teaching activities that you would do. We need to see you engage in the content - we actually want you to learn about at least one of the areas in-depth. Phase 8 of the inquiry has been turned into a reflection on the value of teaching SOSE through inquiry/HOT/constructivist models - it should be about 600 words and so needs to draw on literature and relate to their topic as well. Linking it all together is important.
  • 35.
  • 36. Task Two: Presentation • 1. Choose a topic and design a 30 minute lesson • In groups, prepare and deliver a 30 minute SOSE lesson. In this Presentation, you will deliver ONE learning activity that you would implement in SOSE in the Primary School. Select and model teaching strategies that are appropriate to the development of the key concepts or values. 2. Annotated bibliography: You will also select and evaluate a range of teaching resources (books, videos, teaching kit, web sites, CD-Rom programs, etc) to support facilitation of the Workshop.
  • 37. Let’s Plan! • WOWs • • collect and analyse information and evidence from primary and secondary sources • • evaluate sources of information and evidence for relevance, reliability, origins and perspective • • draw conclusions and make decisions based on information and evidence by identifying patterns • and connections • • communicate descriptions, decisions and conclusions, using different text types for specific • purposes and the conventions of research-based texts • • respond to investigation findings and conclusions by planning and implementing actions
  • 38. K&U- Time, Continuity & Change Australia’s relationship with its Asian and Pacific neighbours is linked to events over a range of time periods, including events associated with the “White Australia” policy, refugees and immigration, free- trade agreements and military alliances.
  • 39. What to do! • 1. Select outcomes • 2. Choose a context for learning (TOPIC) • ( RESEARCH RESOURCES & TALK) • 3. Make explicit what Ss. need to know and do • 4. Select strategies to ensure consistency of teacher judgement. • 5. Design Assessment (what/how) • 6. Identify how, when and where judgements will be made and when progress will be reported on. • 7.Select and sequence learning activities for individual students. • 8. Teach • 9. Gather and record data via Assessment.

Editor's Notes

  1. Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778), the French philosopher, advocated a version of student-centred and experience-based learning for the fictional student Emile in his 1762 book of the same name. Rousseau’s work was later taken up by disciple Johann Pestalozzi (1746-1827), by Maria Montessori (1870-1952) and, most significantly of all, by US philosopher John Dewey (1859-1952).