Principal Component Analysis

1. JUNE 25, 2012
TOPIC:
BAND
COMBINATIONAN
Submitted To:
D BAND RATIOS
Sir Amir Mehmood
AND PRINCIPLE
Subject:
COMPONENT
Remote Sensing II
ANALYSIS (PCA)
Group: Girls_lll
Members:
Roll No’s
Atiqa Ijaz Khan
03
Rafia Naheed
09
Syeda Rbiya Mahmood
Rabia Zahoor
14
28
1

2. JUNE 25, 2012
Table of contents
Band Ratios ........................................................................................................................................... 03
Definitions ......................................................................................................................................... 03
Formula ............................................................................................................................................. 03
Advantage………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 03
Band Combination................................................................................................................................ 07
Principal Component Analysis ............................................................................................................. 09
History ........................................................................................................................................... 09
Objective…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………09
Definitions……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 09
Mathematical Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 10
Important Terms in PCA………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 10
Outline of PCA………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 12
Advantages……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..13
Disadvantages…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………13
Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………13
Expert Opinion………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..14
References............................................................................................................................................15
2

3. JUNE 25, 2012
Band ratios
Definitions:
“Band rationing means dividing the pixels in one band by the corresponding pixels in a
second band.”
“Ratio images are enhancements resulting from the division of DN values in one spectral
band by the corresponding values in another band.”
“To generate a band ratio image, the high digital reflectance values of a specific material is
divided by the corresponding digital reflectance value with lowest reflectance.”
The reason for this is twofold:
1. One is that differences between the spectral reflectance curves of surface types can be
brought out.
2. The second is that illumination, and consequently radiance, may vary, the ratio
between an illuminated and a not illuminated area of the same surface type will be the
same.
Formula for Number of Possible Ratios:
The number of possible ratios that can be developed from n bands of data is:
“n (n-1)”
Example:
For the 6 non-thermal bands of the Landsat Tm or ETM+ data there are 6(6-1), or 30
possible combinations (15 original and 15 reciprocal).
Example on Vegetation:
The near-infrared-to-red for healthy vegetation is normally very high. That for stressed
vegetation is typically lowers (a near-infrared reflectance decrease and the red reflectance
increases). The near-infrared-to-red (red-to-near-infrared) rationed image might be useful
for differentiating between areas of the stressed and non-stressed vegetation. This type of
ratio has been employed extensively in vegetation indices aimed at qualifying greenness
and biomass.
Advantage:
1. The major advantage of ratio images is that they convey the spectral or color
characteristics of the image features, regardless of variations in the scene illumination
conditions.
3

4. JUNE 25, 2012
2. Rationed images are often useful for discriminating refined spectral variation in a
scene that are masked by the brightness variations in images from the spectral bands
or in standard color composite.
Which bands to ratio?
The answer depends on the purpose for creating the ratio. There is a physical basis why each
of the different band combinations works, but it is partially a trial and error process. These
sorts of band ratios come in a couple of different “flavors”.
ETM+ For an Example:
Landsat images are composed of seven different bands, each representing a different portion
of the electromagnetic spectrum. In order to work with Landsat band combinations (RGB
composites of three bands) first we must understand the specifications of each band.
Band 1: (0.45-0.52 µm, blue-green)
This short wavelength of light penetrates better than the other bands, and it is often the band
of choice for monitoring aquatic ecosystems (mapping sediment in water, coral reef habitats,
etc.). Unfortunately this is the “noisiest” of the Landsat bands since it is most susceptible to
atmospheric scatter.
Band 2: (0.52-0.60 µm, green)
This has similar qualities to band 1 but not as extreme. The band was selected because it
matches the wavelength for the green we see when looking at vegetation.
4

5. JUNE 25, 2012
Band 3: (0.63-0.69 µm, red)
Since vegetation absorbs nearly all red light (it is sometimes called the chlorophyll absorption
band) this band can be useful for distinguishing between vegetation and soil and in
monitoring vegetation health.
Band 4: (0.76-0.90 µm, near infrared)
Since water absorbs nearly all light at this wavelength water bodies appear very dark. This
contrasts with bright reflectance for soil and vegetation so it is a good band for defining the
water/land interface.
Band 5: (1.55-1.75 µm, mid-infrared)
5

6. JUNE 25, 2012
This band is very sensitive to moisture and is therefore used to monitor vegetation and soil
moisture. It is also good at differentiating between clouds and snow.
Band 6: (10.40-12.50 µm, thermal infrared)
This is a thermal band, which means it can be used to measure surface temperature. Band 6 is
primarily used for geological applications but it is sometime used to measure plant heat
stress. This is also used to differentiate clouds from bright soils as clouds tend to be very
cold. The resolution of band 6 (60m) is half of the other bands.
Band 7: (2.08-2.35 µm mid-infrared)
This band is also used for vegetation moisture although generally band 5 is preferred for that
application, as well as for soil and geology mapping.
6

7. JUNE 25, 2012
Band combination
Introduction:
Effective display of an image is critical for effective practice of remote sensing. Band
combination is the term that remote sensing use to refer to the assignment of the colors to
represent brightness in different regions of spectrum. A key constraint for the display of any
multispectral image is that human vision portrays differences in the color of surfaces through
our eyes ability to detect differences in brightness in three additives primary-blue, green, red.
Need of Band Combinations:
Single band remote sensing image may not be sufficient top extract desire information,
handling of multiple bands is also inconvenient. Multiple bands may be combined to generate
one or more transformed combined bands following different mathematical operations.
Multiple bands combination has the capability to enhance the features of the interest of the
analyst. Band combination includes addition, subtraction, and rationing, principal component
analysis and so on.
Mathematical treatment:
Band combination is general a combination of multi band (e.g. multispectral) images. It is
defined as an output of multiband functions or operations. In a normal band combination, the
same operation is carried out on each pixel in the image. The output of the operation is an
image of new pixel generated due to some mathematical combination of pixel values of
various bands of an input image.
ETM+ For an Example:
Common Landsat Band Combinations Individual bands can be composited in a Red, Green,
and Blue (RGB) combination in order to visualize the data in color. There are many different
combinations that can be made, and each has their own advantages and disadvantages. Here
are some commonly used Landsat RGB band combinations (color composites):
7

8. JUNE 25, 2012
3, 2, 1 RGB: This color composite is as close to true color that we can get with a Landsat
ETM image. It is also useful for studying aquatic habitats. The downside of this set of bands
is that they tend to produce a hazy image.
4, 3, 2, RGB: This has similar qualities to the image with bands 3, 2, 1 however, since this
includes the near infrared channel (band 4) land water boundaries are clearer and different
types of vegetation are more apparent. This was a popular band combination for Landsat
MSS data since that did not have a mid-infrared band.
4, 5, 3 RGB: This is crisper than the previous two images because the two shortest
wavelength bands (bands 1 and 2) are not included. Different vegetation types can be more
clearly defined and the land/water interface is very clear. Variations in moisture content are
evident with this set of bands. This is probably the most common band combination for
Landsat imagery.
8

9. JUNE 25, 2012
7, 4, 2 RGB: This has similar properties to the 4, 5, and 3 band combination with the biggest
difference being that vegetation is green. This is the band combination that was selected for
the global Landsat mosaic created for NASA.
5, 4, 1 RGB: This band combination has similar properties to the 7, 4, and 2 combination,
however it is better suited in visualizing agricultural vegetation.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
History:
Principal component analysis was first proposed in 1933 by Hotelling in order to solve the
problem of decor relating the statistical dependency between variables in multi-variety
statistical data derived from exam scores, Hotelling (1933). Since then, PCA has become a
widely used tool in statistical analysis for the measurement of correlated data relationships
between variables, but it has also found applications in signal processing and pattern
recognition for which it is often referred to as the Karhunen-Loeve transform, Therein
(1989).
9

10. JUNE 25, 2012
Objectives of Principal Component Analysis:
1. To discover or to reduce the dimensionality of the data set.
2. To identify new meaningful underlying variables.
Definition of Principal Components Analysis (PCA):
“Is a method in which original data is transformed into a new coordinate system, which acts
to condense the information, which is found in the original inter-correlated variables into a
few uncorrelated variables, called principal components”
“In any principal components rotation, the first component or dimension accounts for the
maximum proportion of the variance of the original image, and subsequent components
account for maximum proportion of the remaining variance.”
Mathematical background on principal component analysis:
Eigen Analysis:
The mathematical technique used in PCA is called Eigen analysis:
Solve for the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a square symmetric matrix with sums of
squares and cross products. The eigenvector associated with the largest eigenvalue has the
same direction as the first principal component. The eigenvector associated with the second
largest eigenvalue determines the direction of the second principal component. The sum of
the eigenvalues equals the trace of the square matrix and the maximum number of
eigenvectors equals the number of rows (or columns) of this matrix.
Important Terms in Principle Component Analysis (PCA):
1. Factor analysis: The search for the “factors” (i.e. band combinations) that contain the
most information.
2. Original Data: The set of brightness values for n bands and m pixels.
10

11. JUNE 25, 2012
3. PCA: A linear method of factor analysis that uses the mathematical concepts of
eigenvalues and eigenvectors. It amounts to a “rotation” of the coordinate axes to identify the
Principle Components.
4. Principle Component: An optimum linear combination of band values comprising a new
data layer (or image).
5. Co-variance: A measure of the redundancy of two bands (i and j), created by summing the
product of the two band values over all the pixels (M).
6. Correlation: Co-variance normalized by the variances of the two bands.
7. Redundant bands: Bands with a CC=1 contain the same information.
8. Correlation Matrix: A square symmetric matrix containing the correlation coefficients
between every pair of bands. It contains statistical information about the data.
9. Eigenvector: The set of weights applied to band values to obtain the PC. Eigenvectors
represent the orientation of the principal axes of each component (as an angle). Eigenvectors
are standardized so that the squares of the elements sum to one. Therefore, an eigenvector
loading reflects the relative importance of a variable within a principal component but does
11

12. JUNE 25, 2012
not reflect the value of the component itself. Eigen Vectors show the direction of axes of a
fitted ellipsoid
10. Eigenvalue: A measure of the variance in a PC. Eigenvalues represent the lengths of each
successive component axis, therefore the greater the eigenvalues the more "important" the
component is for explaining the variation in the dataset. The percentage of the total variance
explained by each eigenvalue is often more useful as it gives the relative contribution of each
eigenvalue to explaining the variance in the dataset. Eigen Values show the significance of
the corresponding axis. The larger the Eigen value, the more separation between mapped
data. For high dimensional data, only few of Eigen values are significant.
11. Axes Rotation: Multiplying the original data matrix by a matrix of eigenvectors is
equivalent to rotating the data to a new coordinate system.
12. Standraised PC: The principal components calculated using correlation matrix.
13. Unstandardized PC: The principal components calculated using covariance matrix.
Outline of Principle Component Analysis:
1. Start with an image data set including the reflectance values from n bands with m pixels.
This non-square nxm matrix will be called D.
2. This data set may contain “redundancies” i.e. bands whose reflectance’s correlate
perfectly with another band. It may also contain noise.
Noise: Our definition of noise is signal that does not correlate at all between bands
3. Subtract the means from each band and compute the variances and co-variances between
each pair of bands. Place these values into an nxn square matrix (say A). It is symmetric.
Normalize the co-variances by the square-root of the variances to form the correlation matrix.
This is a useful matrix to study, and it forms the basis of PCA.
Note: At this point, one could just delete bands that correlate well with other bands. This
action would reduce the size of the data set. The PCA method below is more objective and
systematic.
12

13. JUNE 25, 2012
4.
Find
formula:
the
eigenvalues
and
eigenvectors
of
the
dataset
by
solving
this
________________________ (1)
Where λ is an eigenvalue and V is an eigenvector.
Eigen: The word “Eigen” means that these quantities are characteristics of the correlation
matrix (say A).They reveal the hidden properties it.
Typically there will be n different solutions to (1), so there will be n paired eigenvalues and
eigenvectors (i.e. iλ .and IV). The eigenvalues will be real and positive (because A is
symmetric). We usually list these eigenvalues and eigenvectors in order of decreasing
eigenvalue. That is, the first eigenvector corresponds to the largest eigenvalue.
5. The eigenvectors have a dimension equal to n, i.e. the number of original bands. The first
eigenvector represents a synthetic spectrum containing the largest variance across the scene.
6. The eigenvectors are orthogonal to each other, for example 021 =VV.
They are normally scaled so that their length is unity, that is 1|| =iV.
With these two properties, the multiplying the original dataset by an eigenvector rotates the
reflectance vector for a pixel where PC1 is the first Principle Component. It is a vector with
m components representing a brightness value for each pixel, i.e. it is a new single band
image. Its pixel values are linear combinations of the original band values for that pixel. The
weights are given by the components of the first eigenvector. Because of our ordering of
eigenvalues, this image contains the most “information” of any single image.
The first eigenvalue is proportional to the brightness variance in the first PC.
To obtain the other Principle Components, we repeat (2) with the other eigenvectors so that
___________________ (2)
And the PC data layers can be stacked to form a new “data cube”. If desired, only the first
few PCs can be kept, reducing the size of the dataset. For example, if the original dataset had
200 bands (i.e. n = 200), you could keep only the ten PCs with the largest eigenvalues. This
dataset is only 1/20 of the original size. The number of pixels is unchanged.
13

14. JUNE 25, 2012
7. A remarkable property of the new data cube is that the band values are completely
uncorrelated. There is no more redundancy! (Actually, the uncorrelated data in the original
scene is pushed off into the high PC components.) Another property is that the bands are
ordered by their “information content” (i.e. variance).
Advantage:
The primary advantage of PCA is Principal Component’s analysis generates orthogonal
(uncorrelated) components that represent 100% of the variance present in the original dataset.
Disadvantage:
A disadvantage of the PC representation is that one can no longer identify spectral signatures
of objects. A “pixel profile” in the new data cube is not a spectral signature (i.e. reflectance
plotted against wavelength).
Summary of Principal Components Analysis (PCA):
 PCA is a technique that transforms the original vector image data into smaller set of
uncorrelated variables.
 The variables represent most of the image information and easier to interpret.
 Principal components are derived such that the first PC accounts for much of the
variation of the original data. The second (vertical) accounts for most of the remaining
variation.
 PCA is useful in reducing the dimensionality (number of bands) that used for analysis.
Minimum noise fraction (MNF) method can be used with hyper spectral data for noise
reduction.
Expert Opinion about PCA:
1. Mather, (2003) states that PCA is a standard method for deriving reduced data
or minimizing information redundancy in the original image.
2. Zumsprekel and Prinz, (2000) states that PCA reduces the dimensionality
Of the dataset while retaining as much information as possible.
3. A more detailed reading of PCA can be taken from Jensen (1996), Mather
(2003), and Gibson and Power (2000). Principal Component Analysis was run on bands
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, &7. The results were six PCA bands and were visually assessed using
RGB band combinations.
4. Zumsprekel and Prinz, (2000) and Rajesh (2008) state that the first PC (PC
-1) combines the total albedo difference of all original TM bands, the second PC (PC-2)
emphasize the spectral differences between the visible spectrum (VIS) and the infrared
spectrum (IR) and the third PC (PC-3) illustrates albedo variations within the IR
spectrum. They further state that the higher principal components (PC-4 to -6) may
contain important lithological information but are often increasingly loaded with noise
effect. The first 3 PC bands have been selected in this study, because they best highlight the
lithological features.
14

15. JUNE 25, 2012
References
PDF-FORMATS :
1. A HYBRID IMAGE CLASSIFICATION APPROACH FOR THE SYSTEMATIC
ANALYSIS OF LAND COVER (LC) CHANGES IN THE NIGER DELTA
REGION.
2. A TUTORIAL ON PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS.
3. EVALUATING PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS FOR IDENTIFYING
OPTIMAL BANDS USING WETLAND HYPERSPECTRAL MEASUREMENTS
FROM THE GREAT LAKES, USA ,
4. IDENTIFYING HYDROCARBON LEAKAGE INDUCED ANOMALIES USING
LANDSAT-7 /ETM+ DATA PROCESSING TECHNIQUES IN THE WEST SLOPE
OF SONGLIAO BASIN, CHINA
5. LAND-COVER
CLASSIFICATION
USING
ASTER
MULTI-BAND
COMBINATIONS BASED ON WAVELET FUSION AND SOM NEURAL
NETWORK
BOOKS:
1. DIGITAL REMOTE SENSING BY PRITHVISH NAG, M. KUDRAT
2. INTRODUCTION TO
RANDOLPH WYNNE
3.
REMOTE
SENSING, BY
JAMES
CAMPBELL,
JENSEN, J.R. (1996). INTRODUCTORY DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING: A
REMOTE SENSING PERSPECTIVE. SECOND EDITION. PRENTICE HALL.
4. LILLESAND, T. M. AND R. W. KIEFER (2002). REMOTE SENSING AND
IMAGE INTERPRETATION. NEW YORK, JOHN WILEY & SONS, FIFTH
EDITION.
5. TEXTBOOK
OF
REMOTE
SENSING
AND
INFORMATION SYSTEM BY KALI CHARAN SAHU
GEOGRAPHICAL
15