SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 70
Jeff Ayscue
Alex Esche
Jurmeyne Espina
Overview
 Design Requirements
 Flight Performance
 Design Evolution
 Aircraft Configuration
 Detailed Design
 Maintenance Improvements
 Requirements Verification
Design Requirements
• Passenger transport
• 250 – 400 passengers depending on configuration
• Operating altitude = 50,000 ft
• Reduced fuel consumption, 20% less than 777
• Range min 4500nm
• High speed subsonic M=.95
• Major maintenance span increased 25% over B777
Challenges
 Cruising altitude at 50,000 ft
 Air has lesser density; Reduced max velocity
 High speed subsonic M=0.95
 Drag coefficient dramatically increases at Mach number
M = 0.9 to 1
 Major maintenance span increased 25%
 Maintenance frequency is subject to Operator
discrepancy
Drag coefficient vs. Mach number
Variation of cL with M∞
Boeing 777-200LR Standard Configuration
Cruise Altitude 35,000ft
Cruise Speed 0.84 Mach 290 Knots CAS at 35,000ft
Max Capacity 301 pax
MTOW 766,000lbs
Empty Weight, Operating 320,000lbs
Fuel Capacity 327,567lbs 47,890 Gallons
Fuselage Length 209ft
Fuselage Diameter 20ft 244 Inches
Wingspan 212ft
Wing Area 4,605ft^2
Lift Coefficient
35,000ft .084 Mach .660379
50,000ft .095 Mach 1.12763
Max Cruise Thrust 110,000lbs 2 Engines = 220,000lbs total
Boeing 777-200LR Maximum Performance
Boeing 777-200LR Standard Configuration
Test 1 Parameters
Relevant Changes From Original:
• Decreased Fuel Capacity
• Decreased MTOW
Test 1 Original Difference Requirement
Altitude 50,000ft 49,200ft + 800ft Met
Max Speed 0.948 Mach 0.835
Mach
+ 0.113 Mach -0.002 Mach
Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - -
MTOW 569,459 766,000lbs -196,541 -
Empty Weight,
Operating
240,000lbs 320,000lbs -80,000 -
Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 327,567lbs -196,541 -
Fuselage Length 209ft 209ft - -
Test 1 Performance
Test 1.2 Parameters
Relevant Changes From Previous Test:
• Extended Fuselage Length by 86ft
• MTOW Increased to account for longer fuselage
Test 1.2 Previous
Test
Difference Requirement
Altitude 50,000ft 50,000ft None Met
Max Speed 0.942
Mach
0.948 Mach - 0.006
Mach
-0.008 Mach
Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - -
MTOW 574,459 569,459 + 5,000 -
Empty Weight,
Operating
245,000lbs 240,000lbs + 5,000 -
Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 131,026lbs - -
Fuselage Length 295ft 209ft + 86 -
Test 1.2 Performance
Test 1.2 Design
Test 2.1 Parameters
Relevant Changes From Original:
• 4 New Engines = GEnx-1B54
• Increased Thrust
• Decreased Fuel Capacity
• Decreased MTOW
Test 2.1 Original Difference Requirement
Altitude 50,000ft 49,200ft + 800ft Met
Max Speed 0.932 Mach 0.835 Mach + 0.097 Mach -0.018 Mach
Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - -
Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 327,567lbs - 196,541 -
MTOW 585,037lbs 766,000lbs - 180422 -
Empty Weight, Operating 255,578lbs 320,000lbs - 64,422 -
Max Cruise Thrust 229,576lbs 220,000lbs + 9,576 -
Fuselage Length 209ft 209ft - -
Test 2.1 Performance
Test 2.1 Design
Test 2.2 Parameters
Relevant Changes From Previous Test:
• Extended Fuselage Length by 86ft
• MTOW Increased to account for longer fuselage
Test 2.2 Previous
Test
Difference Requirement
Altitude 50,000ft 50,000ft None Met
Max Speed 0.949 Mach 0.932 Mach + 0.017 Mach -0.001 Mach
Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - -
Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 131,026lbs - -
MTOW 590,037lbs 585,037lbs + 5000 -
Empty Weight, Operating 260,578lbs 255,578lbs + 5,000 -
Max Thrust 229,576lbs 229,576lbs None -
Fuselage Length 295ft 209ft + 86 -
Test 2.2 Performance
Test 2.2 Design
Test 3.1 Parameters
Relevant Changes From Original:
• 1 Additional Engine = GEnx-1B78/P2
• Increased Thrust
• Decreased Fuel Capacity
• Decreased MTOW
Test 3.1 Original Difference Requirement
Altitude 50,000ft 49,200ft + 800 Met
Max Speed 0.966 Mach 0.835 Mach + 0.131Mach + 0.016 Mach (Met)
Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - -
Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 327,567lbs - 196,541 -
MTOW 583,011lbs 766,000lbs - 182,989 -
Empty Weight, Operating 253,552lbs 320,000lbs - 66,448 -
Max Thrust 288,789lbs 220,000lbs + 57,594 -
Fuselage Length 209ft 209ft - -
Test 3.1 Performance
Test 3.1 Design
Test 3.2 Parameters
Relevant Changes From Previous Test:
• Extended Fuselage Length by 86ft
• MTOW Increased to account for longer fuselage
Test 3.2 Previous
Test
Difference Requirement
Altitude 50,000ft 50,000ft None Met
Max Speed 0.977 Mach 0.966 Mach + 0.011 Mach + 0.027 Mach (Met)
Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - -
Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 131,026lbs - -
MTOW 588,011lbs 583,011lbs - -
Empty Weight, Operating 258,552lbs 253,552lbs - -
Max Thrust 288,789lbs 288,789lbs - -
Fuselage Length 295ft 209ft + 86 -
Test 3.2 Performance
Test 3.2 Design
Test 3.3 Parameters
Relevant Changes From Previous Test:
• Delta Main Wing
• Removed Horizontal Stabilizer
Test 3.3 Previous Test Difference Requirement
Altitude 50,000ft 50,000ft None Met
Max Speed 1.110 Mach 0.977 Mach + .133 Mach + 0.160 Mach (Met)
Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - -
Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 131,026lbs - -
MTOW 588,011lbs 588,011lbs - -
Empty Weight, Operating 258,552lbs 258,552lbs - -
Max Thrust 288,789lbs 288,789lbs - -
Fuselage Length 295ft 295ft - -
Fuselage Diameter 20ft 20ft - -
Wingspan 216ft 212ft + 8ft -
Wing Area 12,960ft^2 4,605ft^2 + 8,355ft^2 -
Test 3.3 Performance
Test 3.3 Design
Test 3.3 Design
Test 3.3 Design
Test 3.3 Design
Test 3.4 Parameters
Relevant Changes From Previous Test:
• Extended Fuselage Length
• Decreased Fuselage Diameter
Test 3.4 Previous Test Difference Requirement
Altitude 50,000ft 50,000ft None Met
Max Speed at 100% Power 1.223 Mach 1.110 Mach + 0.113 Mach + 0.273 Mach (Met)
Max Cruise at 90% Power 1.131 Mach - - + 0.181 Mach (Met)
Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - -
Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 131,026lbs - -
MTOW 588,011lbs 588,011lbs - -
Empty Weight, Operating 258,552lbs 258,552lbs - -
Max Thrust 288,789lbs 288,789lbs - -
Fuselage Length 315ft 295ft + 20ft -
Fuselage Diameter 15ft 20ft - 5ft -
Test 3.4 Performance
Max Speed
At 100% Power
Cruise Speed
At 90% Power
Test 3.4 Design
Inboard Profile
 Cabin Length – 173’-11’’
 8 Exits – 6 Door and 2 Over the wing
 8 Lavatories
Cabin Layout
 305 Maximum passenger capacity
 3-class Configuration
 First class cabin at 60in pitch
 24 seats
 Business class cabin at 38in pitch
 54 seats
 Economy class cabin at 31-32in pitch
 227 seats
Cabin Cross Section
 Cabin Max Width
 14’-4.9”
 Maximum Height
 6’-9”
 Economy class seating
 7 abreast configuration
 Seat width 18.2”
Cabin Cross Section
 Business class seating
 6 abreast configuration
 Seat width 22”
 First class seating
 4 abreast configuration
 Seat width 29”
Inputs
- Atmospheric Conditions
- Chosen Sweep Angle, Thickness
ratio, Taper Ratio, CLmax
- Wing Loadings and Aspect Ratios
- Initial Gross Weight estimate
Computed Values
- Surface Areas
- Wing and Tail Spans and Areas
- Chord Lengths
- Mean Aerodynamic Chords
1) Required Thrust
for Takeoff
Calculated required thrust for
takeoff (T1) using selected CLmax
and predicted GW
2) Engine Sizing
Calculate size of engines from
required power
Initial Flat Plate
Drag Estimate
Calculate equivalent flat-plate
area and drag from aircraft
parameters
3) Thrust
Calculate Thrust for Vmax (T2)
during takeoff, and thrust at
ceiling altitude (T3)
Is T1 greater than
or equal to T2,
T3?
NO
Re-iterate with a thrust
greater than previously
calculated thrust
IF YES, Engine
size is correct!
Estimate
Empty Weight
Calculate using Raymer
weight equations
Calculate fuel
required for
design mission
Calculate the
Gross Weight
- Add payload, crew, fuel and
empty weight
Is the Calculated
Gross Weight =
Guessed Gross
Weight?
YES. Feasible
Design!
NO
Re-iterate using
newly calculated
Gross weight
Iterative Sizing
Weight Breakdown
Component Weight (lb) Component Weight (lb)
Wing 68,368 APU 930
Vertical Tail 1041 Instruments 3,212
Winglets 1,079 Hydraulics 6,139
Fuselage 124,394 Basic Electrical 4,419
Surface Controls 5,310 Avionics 4,989
Engine Install 16,997 Furnishings 12,200
Engines (QTY 3) 42,630 A/C 7,930
Fuel System 1,178 Oil 372
Batteries 300 Miscellaneous 600
Max Takeoff GW Empty Weight Fuel Weight PAX Crew
521,703 lb 231,740 lb 212,487 lb 60,200 lb 1,600 lb
Aircraft Systems
 Aircraft Systems have been upgraded to the new
technology of the Boeing 777x
 Integrated Systems – Critical Systems are integrated into
one cabinet
 Central Maintenance Computer
 Thrust Management System
 Flight Data Recorder System
 Primary Display System
 Data Communication Management
 Flight Management Systems
Fly-By-Wire (FBW)
 Mechanically signaled flight controls are replaced by
digital controls
 Flight Control Systems
 Actuation Systems
Propulsion System
 Engines - Rolls Royce Trent UltraFan
 Offers at least 20 per cent better fuel burn and CO2
emissions than the first generation of Trent engine
 Increased bypass ratio to 15:1
Alternative Jet Fuel
 Bio-SPK – 50/50 Blend of Jet A fuel and Jatropha Oil
 Jatropha Oil
 From Jatropha Curcas plant – resistant to drought and
can be planted in desert climates; can grow anywhere
 Compatible with current aircraft systems
 Engine ground tests showed reduction in fuel flow due
to higher heat of combustion
 Could possibly reduce carbon emissions by up to 80%
Approach
 Identified and addressed holes in systems and
processes that currently are in use.
 Incorporated existing materials, technology and data
analysis technique to improve airplane designs and
maintenance processes/programs
 Expected results is a overall improvement to not only
maintenance but operational efficiency as well.
 Listed improvements could extend major maintenance
by 25%
 Use of Composite Material in airplane design
 Redesign of Turbine Engine Blades
 Improve capabilities of Boeing’s Airplane Health Management
System (AHMS)
 Improvements in Maintenance Programs
 Condition Based Maintenance: based on data collected and
analyzed from (AHMS)
 use of “Machine Learning”.
 Key is some improvement require time to see results
Improvements
Composites
 Composites materials consist of a fibrous
reinforcements bonded together with a matrix
material
 Allows the stiffness and strength of the material to
change with direction of loading
Composites
 Beneficial characteristics
 Heat Resistance
 Weighs less than traditional materials
 Corrosion resistance
 Strength and durability
 Part consolidation
 A single piece made of composite materials can replace an entire
assembly of metal parts.
Composites
Composites
 Most efficient use of advanced composites in aircraft
structure is in applications with:
 Highly loaded parts with thick gages.
 High fatigue loads
 Areas susceptible to corrosion
 Critical weight reduction
 Major part of heavy maintenance is structural
inspections.
 Expanding the use of composites can contribute to
improvement and expanding on inspections intervals
Turbine Engine Blades
 Build hollow turbine blades
 Being developed at Iowa State University
 Benefits
 Coolant is blow through an arrangement of holes
 Creates a cooling film between the blades
 Reduces heat, allowing blades to retain there shape and strength.
 Better cooling equals fuel savings, longer lasting parts, cuts cost
• Improvements could reduce maintenance and inspections
Airplane Health Management
System
 What is it?
 Airplane Health Management System uses real-time airplane data to
provide enhanced fault forwarding, troubleshooting, and historical
maintenance information.
• Valuable decision making support tool
 Fix or fly mentality
Enhancements
 Current capabilities
 Engine monitor/flight parametric data such as fuel flow, fuel mileage,
thrust deviation.
• Enhancements
 Pinpoint vibrations
 Expand system to include flight controls and structural vibration monitoring.
• Why flight controls and structural?
 Detection depends entirely on crew
 Response to vibration is a exercise in airmanship
 Monitoring and reducing vibrations can reduce structural fatigue. This
could lead to reduction in schedule and unscheduled maintenance repair
time and cost
 Extend structural intspections
 Identifying and correcting the cause of in-flight airplane vibration often is accomplished
through trial and error, which can consume many maintenance hours (Hence pinpoint
vibrations)
Results
• AHMS = reduction in schedule interruption, increase
in maintenance and operational efficiency.
 Valuable data can be obtain for use in optimizing
maintenance.
• Key
 The system and its architecture must be developed with
clear requirements and metrics.
Challenges
 Requires a strong commitment
 Looking passed upfront cost and seeing future savings
 System development is an intensive and time
consuming process
 Results may take years
Improve Maintenance Programs
• Boeing currently conducts a review of maintenance
processes
 Improve the process
• How?
 Incorporate AHMS data
 Develop and system which
incorporates machine learning
Improve Maintenance Programs
 Optimization of maintenance programs will be based
on:
 Results from analysis
 Fleet Trends
 Real world outcome
 Evaluation of 400 task on Boeings 777
 Resulted in the extension of the maintenance inspection
intervals.
DATA!
• Power of Data
 Statistical approach
 More methods of analyzing data than one can imagine
• System requirement?
 Data and than more data
 Must be good data (garbage in garbage out).
 Current Boeing method relies on the
 Collection of Service data
 Analysis of Service data
 Both Positive and Negative
 Results
 Provides necessary information to make decisions and
recommendation
Enhanced Maintenance Programs
 Take it one step further
 Use AHMS data
 Machine Learning “Big Data”
 Use machine learning to optimize a predictive maintenance
schedule
MACHINE LEARNING
 Machine learning
 Part of artificial intelligence, concerns the construction and study of
systems that can learn from data.
 Some machine learning systems attempt to eliminate the need for
human data analysis, while others adopt a collaborative approach
between human and machine.
 Uses algorithms to learn from data.
 Aids in identification of key trends that otherwise may be missed
 Can contribute to the modification of maintenance programs to
improve efficiency
Conclusion
 Everything discussed builds on one another
 Impact is not just limited to Maintenance
Requirements Verification
• Passenger transport
• This aircraft can operate as a commercial passenger carrying flight and an
extended range of passenger carrying operations.
• 250 – 400 passengers depending on configuration
• Aircraft can carry a maximum of 305 Passengers
• Operating altitude = 50,000 ft
• Cruise altitude is at 50,ooo ft
• Reduced fuel consumption, 20% less than 777
• Fuel consumption is 20% less per engine
• Range min 4500nm
• Aircraft range is 4500nm
• High speed subsonic M=.95
• Aircraft cruise speed is in High subsonic region at M=0.9
• Major maintenance span increased 25% over B777
• Major maintenance span increased
Thank you!
References
Bertin, John J., and Cummings, Russell M., Aerodynamics for Engineers, 5th Ed., Pearson,
New Jersey
Component Weights." n.d. Document. 15 September 2011.
<http://adg.stanford.edu/aa241/structures/componentweight.html>.
Allen, Mike. "Alternative Fuels to Gasoline - Cost of Alternative Fuels - Popular Mechanics."
Automotive Care, Home Improvement, Tools, DIY Tips - Popular Mechanics. Popular
Mechanics, 1 May 2006. Web. 19 Oct. 2011.
<http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/alternative-fuel/news/2690341>.
"Jatropha Advantages - Benefits." PlantOils.in - The Home of Plant Oils Online. Oil from
Jatropha. Web. 19 Oct. 2011.
<http://www.plantoils.in/portal/jatropha/add/adv/adv.html>.
Kinder, Dr. James D., and Timothy Rahmes. "Evaluation of Bio-Derived Synthetic."
Evaluation of Bio-Derived Synthetic. The Boeing Company, June 2009. Web. Oct. 2011.
<http://www.ascension-publishing.com/BIZ/Bio-SPK.pdf>.
Raymer, Daniel P. Aircraft Design: a Conceptual Approach. Washington, D.C.: American
Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1989. Print.
Rolls Royce UltraFan. Rolls Royce. Web. 12 Mar. 2014. < http://www.rolls-
royce.com/news/press_releases/2014/260214_next-generation.jsp>.

More Related Content

What's hot

Diesel Adaptation for the Toyota Prius Hybrid System
Diesel Adaptation for the Toyota Prius Hybrid SystemDiesel Adaptation for the Toyota Prius Hybrid System
Diesel Adaptation for the Toyota Prius Hybrid SystemV-Motech
 
Griess Thesis Defense PP
Griess Thesis Defense PPGriess Thesis Defense PP
Griess Thesis Defense PPEric Griess
 
Aircraft Design for Boeing Phantom Works
Aircraft Design for Boeing Phantom WorksAircraft Design for Boeing Phantom Works
Aircraft Design for Boeing Phantom Workssimoalb88
 
Tutorial VSP Conference 2013, San Luis Obispo, CA
Tutorial VSP Conference 2013, San Luis Obispo, CATutorial VSP Conference 2013, San Luis Obispo, CA
Tutorial VSP Conference 2013, San Luis Obispo, CAHersh Amin
 
Optimum weight design of ship’s structures
Optimum weight design of ship’s structuresOptimum weight design of ship’s structures
Optimum weight design of ship’s structuresMuhammed Moanes
 
TAG WOOHOOPRESENTAION
TAG WOOHOOPRESENTAIONTAG WOOHOOPRESENTAION
TAG WOOHOOPRESENTAIONDwight Nava
 
ALTERNATE FUEL SOURCE TRAINER; AVIRIDIS H2
ALTERNATE FUEL SOURCE TRAINER; AVIRIDIS H2ALTERNATE FUEL SOURCE TRAINER; AVIRIDIS H2
ALTERNATE FUEL SOURCE TRAINER; AVIRIDIS H2jandamd
 
A Review Paper on Effects of Different Intake Manifold Designs on Diesel Engi...
A Review Paper on Effects of Different Intake Manifold Designs on Diesel Engi...A Review Paper on Effects of Different Intake Manifold Designs on Diesel Engi...
A Review Paper on Effects of Different Intake Manifold Designs on Diesel Engi...ijsrd.com
 
Load test on a perkins diesel engine
Load test on a perkins diesel engineLoad test on a perkins diesel engine
Load test on a perkins diesel engineLahiru Dilshan
 
IRJET- Design, Analysis & Weight Reduction of Piston of Refrigerator Compressor
IRJET- Design, Analysis & Weight Reduction of Piston of Refrigerator CompressorIRJET- Design, Analysis & Weight Reduction of Piston of Refrigerator Compressor
IRJET- Design, Analysis & Weight Reduction of Piston of Refrigerator CompressorIRJET Journal
 
An Innovative IC Engine Concept for UAV Application
An Innovative IC Engine Concept for UAV ApplicationAn Innovative IC Engine Concept for UAV Application
An Innovative IC Engine Concept for UAV ApplicationJayesh Mehta
 

What's hot (20)

D830.pdf
D830.pdfD830.pdf
D830.pdf
 
KD1000-E.pdf
KD1000-E.pdfKD1000-E.pdf
KD1000-E.pdf
 
Diesel Adaptation for the Toyota Prius Hybrid System
Diesel Adaptation for the Toyota Prius Hybrid SystemDiesel Adaptation for the Toyota Prius Hybrid System
Diesel Adaptation for the Toyota Prius Hybrid System
 
KD1000-F.pdf
KD1000-F.pdfKD1000-F.pdf
KD1000-F.pdf
 
Griess Thesis Defense PP
Griess Thesis Defense PPGriess Thesis Defense PP
Griess Thesis Defense PP
 
Aircraft Design for Boeing Phantom Works
Aircraft Design for Boeing Phantom WorksAircraft Design for Boeing Phantom Works
Aircraft Design for Boeing Phantom Works
 
Tutorial VSP Conference 2013, San Luis Obispo, CA
Tutorial VSP Conference 2013, San Luis Obispo, CATutorial VSP Conference 2013, San Luis Obispo, CA
Tutorial VSP Conference 2013, San Luis Obispo, CA
 
Optimum weight design of ship’s structures
Optimum weight design of ship’s structuresOptimum weight design of ship’s structures
Optimum weight design of ship’s structures
 
Ei34813820
Ei34813820Ei34813820
Ei34813820
 
TAG WOOHOOPRESENTAION
TAG WOOHOOPRESENTAIONTAG WOOHOOPRESENTAION
TAG WOOHOOPRESENTAION
 
ALTERNATE FUEL SOURCE TRAINER; AVIRIDIS H2
ALTERNATE FUEL SOURCE TRAINER; AVIRIDIS H2ALTERNATE FUEL SOURCE TRAINER; AVIRIDIS H2
ALTERNATE FUEL SOURCE TRAINER; AVIRIDIS H2
 
A Review Paper on Effects of Different Intake Manifold Designs on Diesel Engi...
A Review Paper on Effects of Different Intake Manifold Designs on Diesel Engi...A Review Paper on Effects of Different Intake Manifold Designs on Diesel Engi...
A Review Paper on Effects of Different Intake Manifold Designs on Diesel Engi...
 
Kn3419111915
Kn3419111915Kn3419111915
Kn3419111915
 
New 130290711003
New 130290711003New 130290711003
New 130290711003
 
G04925359
G04925359G04925359
G04925359
 
Load test on a perkins diesel engine
Load test on a perkins diesel engineLoad test on a perkins diesel engine
Load test on a perkins diesel engine
 
IRJET- Design, Analysis & Weight Reduction of Piston of Refrigerator Compressor
IRJET- Design, Analysis & Weight Reduction of Piston of Refrigerator CompressorIRJET- Design, Analysis & Weight Reduction of Piston of Refrigerator Compressor
IRJET- Design, Analysis & Weight Reduction of Piston of Refrigerator Compressor
 
30120130405024
3012013040502430120130405024
30120130405024
 
Porject final review
Porject final reviewPorject final review
Porject final review
 
An Innovative IC Engine Concept for UAV Application
An Innovative IC Engine Concept for UAV ApplicationAn Innovative IC Engine Concept for UAV Application
An Innovative IC Engine Concept for UAV Application
 

Viewers also liked

JOHNSON_BENJAMIN_11379847_Appendix Collection
JOHNSON_BENJAMIN_11379847_Appendix CollectionJOHNSON_BENJAMIN_11379847_Appendix Collection
JOHNSON_BENJAMIN_11379847_Appendix CollectionBen Johnson
 
priliminary design of aircraft
priliminary design of aircraftpriliminary design of aircraft
priliminary design of aircraftbob
 
Final Report -Aircraft Design
Final Report -Aircraft DesignFinal Report -Aircraft Design
Final Report -Aircraft DesignThomas Spisak
 

Viewers also liked (7)

JOHNSON_BENJAMIN_11379847_Appendix Collection
JOHNSON_BENJAMIN_11379847_Appendix CollectionJOHNSON_BENJAMIN_11379847_Appendix Collection
JOHNSON_BENJAMIN_11379847_Appendix Collection
 
Index adp 2
Index adp 2Index adp 2
Index adp 2
 
ME5539-ME5309 AAA
ME5539-ME5309 AAAME5539-ME5309 AAA
ME5539-ME5309 AAA
 
Final Report
Final ReportFinal Report
Final Report
 
priliminary design of aircraft
priliminary design of aircraftpriliminary design of aircraft
priliminary design of aircraft
 
Aero474 Design Example
Aero474 Design ExampleAero474 Design Example
Aero474 Design Example
 
Final Report -Aircraft Design
Final Report -Aircraft DesignFinal Report -Aircraft Design
Final Report -Aircraft Design
 

Similar to Passenger Transport Aircraft Concept Design-Final

Conceptual design of a WIG Aircraft
Conceptual design of a WIG AircraftConceptual design of a WIG Aircraft
Conceptual design of a WIG AircraftSri Raghavan
 
Dep final presentation
Dep final presentationDep final presentation
Dep final presentationJohn Macnamara
 
Alex Esche Concept Aircraft Project
Alex Esche Concept Aircraft ProjectAlex Esche Concept Aircraft Project
Alex Esche Concept Aircraft ProjectAlex Esche
 
Prelim final presentation
Prelim final presentationPrelim final presentation
Prelim final presentationZack White
 
Senior Design Progress Report
Senior Design Progress ReportSenior Design Progress Report
Senior Design Progress ReportConnor McGuire
 
The End of Oil Lubricated Bearings? Extreme Hi-Temp Foil Bearings by James Wa...
The End of Oil Lubricated Bearings? Extreme Hi-Temp Foil Bearings by James Wa...The End of Oil Lubricated Bearings? Extreme Hi-Temp Foil Bearings by James Wa...
The End of Oil Lubricated Bearings? Extreme Hi-Temp Foil Bearings by James Wa...Mohawk Innovative Technology
 
HSA_FINALPRESENTATION
HSA_FINALPRESENTATIONHSA_FINALPRESENTATION
HSA_FINALPRESENTATIONZenghui Liu
 
Innovative IC Engine Concept
Innovative IC Engine ConceptInnovative IC Engine Concept
Innovative IC Engine ConceptJayesh Mehta
 
Aiaa paper final 2015 (2)
Aiaa  paper final 2015 (2)Aiaa  paper final 2015 (2)
Aiaa paper final 2015 (2)Jayesh Mehta
 
Active Charge Air Cooling for Combustion Improvement
Active Charge Air Cooling for Combustion ImprovementActive Charge Air Cooling for Combustion Improvement
Active Charge Air Cooling for Combustion ImprovementSteve Hinton
 
Furnace Improvements Sales Presentation
Furnace Improvements Sales PresentationFurnace Improvements Sales Presentation
Furnace Improvements Sales PresentationJonathan Morales
 
presentation3-final.pptx
presentation3-final.pptxpresentation3-final.pptx
presentation3-final.pptxAaradhyaYadav6
 
Aiaa Student Design Build Fly Electric Airplane
Aiaa Student Design Build Fly Electric AirplaneAiaa Student Design Build Fly Electric Airplane
Aiaa Student Design Build Fly Electric Airplaneahmad bassiouny
 

Similar to Passenger Transport Aircraft Concept Design-Final (20)

Conceptual design of a WIG Aircraft
Conceptual design of a WIG AircraftConceptual design of a WIG Aircraft
Conceptual design of a WIG Aircraft
 
Dep final presentation
Dep final presentationDep final presentation
Dep final presentation
 
Trent
TrentTrent
Trent
 
Alex Esche Concept Aircraft Project
Alex Esche Concept Aircraft ProjectAlex Esche Concept Aircraft Project
Alex Esche Concept Aircraft Project
 
Trent 1000 presentation
Trent 1000 presentationTrent 1000 presentation
Trent 1000 presentation
 
CFM56
CFM56CFM56
CFM56
 
Prelim final presentation
Prelim final presentationPrelim final presentation
Prelim final presentation
 
Senior Design Progress Report
Senior Design Progress ReportSenior Design Progress Report
Senior Design Progress Report
 
The End of Oil Lubricated Bearings? Extreme Hi-Temp Foil Bearings by James Wa...
The End of Oil Lubricated Bearings? Extreme Hi-Temp Foil Bearings by James Wa...The End of Oil Lubricated Bearings? Extreme Hi-Temp Foil Bearings by James Wa...
The End of Oil Lubricated Bearings? Extreme Hi-Temp Foil Bearings by James Wa...
 
Turbo
TurboTurbo
Turbo
 
Bombardier Q400 NextGen
Bombardier Q400 NextGenBombardier Q400 NextGen
Bombardier Q400 NextGen
 
HSA_FINALPRESENTATION
HSA_FINALPRESENTATIONHSA_FINALPRESENTATION
HSA_FINALPRESENTATION
 
Presentation
PresentationPresentation
Presentation
 
Innovative IC Engine Concept
Innovative IC Engine ConceptInnovative IC Engine Concept
Innovative IC Engine Concept
 
Aiaa paper final 2015 (2)
Aiaa  paper final 2015 (2)Aiaa  paper final 2015 (2)
Aiaa paper final 2015 (2)
 
Active Charge Air Cooling for Combustion Improvement
Active Charge Air Cooling for Combustion ImprovementActive Charge Air Cooling for Combustion Improvement
Active Charge Air Cooling for Combustion Improvement
 
CAT_Brochure
CAT_BrochureCAT_Brochure
CAT_Brochure
 
Furnace Improvements Sales Presentation
Furnace Improvements Sales PresentationFurnace Improvements Sales Presentation
Furnace Improvements Sales Presentation
 
presentation3-final.pptx
presentation3-final.pptxpresentation3-final.pptx
presentation3-final.pptx
 
Aiaa Student Design Build Fly Electric Airplane
Aiaa Student Design Build Fly Electric AirplaneAiaa Student Design Build Fly Electric Airplane
Aiaa Student Design Build Fly Electric Airplane
 

Passenger Transport Aircraft Concept Design-Final

  • 2. Overview  Design Requirements  Flight Performance  Design Evolution  Aircraft Configuration  Detailed Design  Maintenance Improvements  Requirements Verification
  • 3. Design Requirements • Passenger transport • 250 – 400 passengers depending on configuration • Operating altitude = 50,000 ft • Reduced fuel consumption, 20% less than 777 • Range min 4500nm • High speed subsonic M=.95 • Major maintenance span increased 25% over B777
  • 4. Challenges  Cruising altitude at 50,000 ft  Air has lesser density; Reduced max velocity  High speed subsonic M=0.95  Drag coefficient dramatically increases at Mach number M = 0.9 to 1  Major maintenance span increased 25%  Maintenance frequency is subject to Operator discrepancy
  • 5. Drag coefficient vs. Mach number
  • 6. Variation of cL with M∞
  • 7.
  • 8. Boeing 777-200LR Standard Configuration Cruise Altitude 35,000ft Cruise Speed 0.84 Mach 290 Knots CAS at 35,000ft Max Capacity 301 pax MTOW 766,000lbs Empty Weight, Operating 320,000lbs Fuel Capacity 327,567lbs 47,890 Gallons Fuselage Length 209ft Fuselage Diameter 20ft 244 Inches Wingspan 212ft Wing Area 4,605ft^2 Lift Coefficient 35,000ft .084 Mach .660379 50,000ft .095 Mach 1.12763 Max Cruise Thrust 110,000lbs 2 Engines = 220,000lbs total
  • 10. Boeing 777-200LR Standard Configuration
  • 11. Test 1 Parameters Relevant Changes From Original: • Decreased Fuel Capacity • Decreased MTOW Test 1 Original Difference Requirement Altitude 50,000ft 49,200ft + 800ft Met Max Speed 0.948 Mach 0.835 Mach + 0.113 Mach -0.002 Mach Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - - MTOW 569,459 766,000lbs -196,541 - Empty Weight, Operating 240,000lbs 320,000lbs -80,000 - Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 327,567lbs -196,541 - Fuselage Length 209ft 209ft - -
  • 13. Test 1.2 Parameters Relevant Changes From Previous Test: • Extended Fuselage Length by 86ft • MTOW Increased to account for longer fuselage Test 1.2 Previous Test Difference Requirement Altitude 50,000ft 50,000ft None Met Max Speed 0.942 Mach 0.948 Mach - 0.006 Mach -0.008 Mach Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - - MTOW 574,459 569,459 + 5,000 - Empty Weight, Operating 245,000lbs 240,000lbs + 5,000 - Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 131,026lbs - - Fuselage Length 295ft 209ft + 86 -
  • 16. Test 2.1 Parameters Relevant Changes From Original: • 4 New Engines = GEnx-1B54 • Increased Thrust • Decreased Fuel Capacity • Decreased MTOW Test 2.1 Original Difference Requirement Altitude 50,000ft 49,200ft + 800ft Met Max Speed 0.932 Mach 0.835 Mach + 0.097 Mach -0.018 Mach Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - - Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 327,567lbs - 196,541 - MTOW 585,037lbs 766,000lbs - 180422 - Empty Weight, Operating 255,578lbs 320,000lbs - 64,422 - Max Cruise Thrust 229,576lbs 220,000lbs + 9,576 - Fuselage Length 209ft 209ft - -
  • 19. Test 2.2 Parameters Relevant Changes From Previous Test: • Extended Fuselage Length by 86ft • MTOW Increased to account for longer fuselage Test 2.2 Previous Test Difference Requirement Altitude 50,000ft 50,000ft None Met Max Speed 0.949 Mach 0.932 Mach + 0.017 Mach -0.001 Mach Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - - Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 131,026lbs - - MTOW 590,037lbs 585,037lbs + 5000 - Empty Weight, Operating 260,578lbs 255,578lbs + 5,000 - Max Thrust 229,576lbs 229,576lbs None - Fuselage Length 295ft 209ft + 86 -
  • 22. Test 3.1 Parameters Relevant Changes From Original: • 1 Additional Engine = GEnx-1B78/P2 • Increased Thrust • Decreased Fuel Capacity • Decreased MTOW Test 3.1 Original Difference Requirement Altitude 50,000ft 49,200ft + 800 Met Max Speed 0.966 Mach 0.835 Mach + 0.131Mach + 0.016 Mach (Met) Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - - Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 327,567lbs - 196,541 - MTOW 583,011lbs 766,000lbs - 182,989 - Empty Weight, Operating 253,552lbs 320,000lbs - 66,448 - Max Thrust 288,789lbs 220,000lbs + 57,594 - Fuselage Length 209ft 209ft - -
  • 25. Test 3.2 Parameters Relevant Changes From Previous Test: • Extended Fuselage Length by 86ft • MTOW Increased to account for longer fuselage Test 3.2 Previous Test Difference Requirement Altitude 50,000ft 50,000ft None Met Max Speed 0.977 Mach 0.966 Mach + 0.011 Mach + 0.027 Mach (Met) Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - - Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 131,026lbs - - MTOW 588,011lbs 583,011lbs - - Empty Weight, Operating 258,552lbs 253,552lbs - - Max Thrust 288,789lbs 288,789lbs - - Fuselage Length 295ft 209ft + 86 -
  • 28. Test 3.3 Parameters Relevant Changes From Previous Test: • Delta Main Wing • Removed Horizontal Stabilizer Test 3.3 Previous Test Difference Requirement Altitude 50,000ft 50,000ft None Met Max Speed 1.110 Mach 0.977 Mach + .133 Mach + 0.160 Mach (Met) Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - - Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 131,026lbs - - MTOW 588,011lbs 588,011lbs - - Empty Weight, Operating 258,552lbs 258,552lbs - - Max Thrust 288,789lbs 288,789lbs - - Fuselage Length 295ft 295ft - - Fuselage Diameter 20ft 20ft - - Wingspan 216ft 212ft + 8ft - Wing Area 12,960ft^2 4,605ft^2 + 8,355ft^2 -
  • 34. Test 3.4 Parameters Relevant Changes From Previous Test: • Extended Fuselage Length • Decreased Fuselage Diameter Test 3.4 Previous Test Difference Requirement Altitude 50,000ft 50,000ft None Met Max Speed at 100% Power 1.223 Mach 1.110 Mach + 0.113 Mach + 0.273 Mach (Met) Max Cruise at 90% Power 1.131 Mach - - + 0.181 Mach (Met) Max Capacity 301 pax 301 pax - - Fuel Capacity 131,026lbs 131,026lbs - - MTOW 588,011lbs 588,011lbs - - Empty Weight, Operating 258,552lbs 258,552lbs - - Max Thrust 288,789lbs 288,789lbs - - Fuselage Length 315ft 295ft + 20ft - Fuselage Diameter 15ft 20ft - 5ft -
  • 35. Test 3.4 Performance Max Speed At 100% Power Cruise Speed At 90% Power
  • 37.
  • 38. Inboard Profile  Cabin Length – 173’-11’’  8 Exits – 6 Door and 2 Over the wing  8 Lavatories
  • 39. Cabin Layout  305 Maximum passenger capacity  3-class Configuration  First class cabin at 60in pitch  24 seats  Business class cabin at 38in pitch  54 seats  Economy class cabin at 31-32in pitch  227 seats
  • 40. Cabin Cross Section  Cabin Max Width  14’-4.9”  Maximum Height  6’-9”  Economy class seating  7 abreast configuration  Seat width 18.2”
  • 41. Cabin Cross Section  Business class seating  6 abreast configuration  Seat width 22”  First class seating  4 abreast configuration  Seat width 29”
  • 42. Inputs - Atmospheric Conditions - Chosen Sweep Angle, Thickness ratio, Taper Ratio, CLmax - Wing Loadings and Aspect Ratios - Initial Gross Weight estimate Computed Values - Surface Areas - Wing and Tail Spans and Areas - Chord Lengths - Mean Aerodynamic Chords 1) Required Thrust for Takeoff Calculated required thrust for takeoff (T1) using selected CLmax and predicted GW 2) Engine Sizing Calculate size of engines from required power Initial Flat Plate Drag Estimate Calculate equivalent flat-plate area and drag from aircraft parameters 3) Thrust Calculate Thrust for Vmax (T2) during takeoff, and thrust at ceiling altitude (T3) Is T1 greater than or equal to T2, T3? NO Re-iterate with a thrust greater than previously calculated thrust IF YES, Engine size is correct! Estimate Empty Weight Calculate using Raymer weight equations Calculate fuel required for design mission Calculate the Gross Weight - Add payload, crew, fuel and empty weight Is the Calculated Gross Weight = Guessed Gross Weight? YES. Feasible Design! NO Re-iterate using newly calculated Gross weight Iterative Sizing
  • 43. Weight Breakdown Component Weight (lb) Component Weight (lb) Wing 68,368 APU 930 Vertical Tail 1041 Instruments 3,212 Winglets 1,079 Hydraulics 6,139 Fuselage 124,394 Basic Electrical 4,419 Surface Controls 5,310 Avionics 4,989 Engine Install 16,997 Furnishings 12,200 Engines (QTY 3) 42,630 A/C 7,930 Fuel System 1,178 Oil 372 Batteries 300 Miscellaneous 600 Max Takeoff GW Empty Weight Fuel Weight PAX Crew 521,703 lb 231,740 lb 212,487 lb 60,200 lb 1,600 lb
  • 44.
  • 45. Aircraft Systems  Aircraft Systems have been upgraded to the new technology of the Boeing 777x  Integrated Systems – Critical Systems are integrated into one cabinet  Central Maintenance Computer  Thrust Management System  Flight Data Recorder System  Primary Display System  Data Communication Management  Flight Management Systems
  • 46. Fly-By-Wire (FBW)  Mechanically signaled flight controls are replaced by digital controls  Flight Control Systems  Actuation Systems
  • 47. Propulsion System  Engines - Rolls Royce Trent UltraFan  Offers at least 20 per cent better fuel burn and CO2 emissions than the first generation of Trent engine  Increased bypass ratio to 15:1
  • 48. Alternative Jet Fuel  Bio-SPK – 50/50 Blend of Jet A fuel and Jatropha Oil  Jatropha Oil  From Jatropha Curcas plant – resistant to drought and can be planted in desert climates; can grow anywhere  Compatible with current aircraft systems  Engine ground tests showed reduction in fuel flow due to higher heat of combustion  Could possibly reduce carbon emissions by up to 80%
  • 49.
  • 50. Approach  Identified and addressed holes in systems and processes that currently are in use.  Incorporated existing materials, technology and data analysis technique to improve airplane designs and maintenance processes/programs  Expected results is a overall improvement to not only maintenance but operational efficiency as well.
  • 51.  Listed improvements could extend major maintenance by 25%  Use of Composite Material in airplane design  Redesign of Turbine Engine Blades  Improve capabilities of Boeing’s Airplane Health Management System (AHMS)  Improvements in Maintenance Programs  Condition Based Maintenance: based on data collected and analyzed from (AHMS)  use of “Machine Learning”.  Key is some improvement require time to see results Improvements
  • 52. Composites  Composites materials consist of a fibrous reinforcements bonded together with a matrix material  Allows the stiffness and strength of the material to change with direction of loading
  • 53. Composites  Beneficial characteristics  Heat Resistance  Weighs less than traditional materials  Corrosion resistance  Strength and durability  Part consolidation  A single piece made of composite materials can replace an entire assembly of metal parts.
  • 55. Composites  Most efficient use of advanced composites in aircraft structure is in applications with:  Highly loaded parts with thick gages.  High fatigue loads  Areas susceptible to corrosion  Critical weight reduction  Major part of heavy maintenance is structural inspections.  Expanding the use of composites can contribute to improvement and expanding on inspections intervals
  • 56. Turbine Engine Blades  Build hollow turbine blades  Being developed at Iowa State University  Benefits  Coolant is blow through an arrangement of holes  Creates a cooling film between the blades  Reduces heat, allowing blades to retain there shape and strength.  Better cooling equals fuel savings, longer lasting parts, cuts cost • Improvements could reduce maintenance and inspections
  • 57. Airplane Health Management System  What is it?  Airplane Health Management System uses real-time airplane data to provide enhanced fault forwarding, troubleshooting, and historical maintenance information. • Valuable decision making support tool  Fix or fly mentality
  • 58. Enhancements  Current capabilities  Engine monitor/flight parametric data such as fuel flow, fuel mileage, thrust deviation. • Enhancements  Pinpoint vibrations  Expand system to include flight controls and structural vibration monitoring. • Why flight controls and structural?  Detection depends entirely on crew  Response to vibration is a exercise in airmanship  Monitoring and reducing vibrations can reduce structural fatigue. This could lead to reduction in schedule and unscheduled maintenance repair time and cost  Extend structural intspections  Identifying and correcting the cause of in-flight airplane vibration often is accomplished through trial and error, which can consume many maintenance hours (Hence pinpoint vibrations)
  • 59. Results • AHMS = reduction in schedule interruption, increase in maintenance and operational efficiency.  Valuable data can be obtain for use in optimizing maintenance. • Key  The system and its architecture must be developed with clear requirements and metrics.
  • 60. Challenges  Requires a strong commitment  Looking passed upfront cost and seeing future savings  System development is an intensive and time consuming process  Results may take years
  • 61. Improve Maintenance Programs • Boeing currently conducts a review of maintenance processes  Improve the process • How?  Incorporate AHMS data  Develop and system which incorporates machine learning
  • 62. Improve Maintenance Programs  Optimization of maintenance programs will be based on:  Results from analysis  Fleet Trends  Real world outcome  Evaluation of 400 task on Boeings 777  Resulted in the extension of the maintenance inspection intervals.
  • 63. DATA! • Power of Data  Statistical approach  More methods of analyzing data than one can imagine • System requirement?  Data and than more data  Must be good data (garbage in garbage out).  Current Boeing method relies on the  Collection of Service data  Analysis of Service data  Both Positive and Negative  Results  Provides necessary information to make decisions and recommendation
  • 64. Enhanced Maintenance Programs  Take it one step further  Use AHMS data  Machine Learning “Big Data”  Use machine learning to optimize a predictive maintenance schedule
  • 65. MACHINE LEARNING  Machine learning  Part of artificial intelligence, concerns the construction and study of systems that can learn from data.  Some machine learning systems attempt to eliminate the need for human data analysis, while others adopt a collaborative approach between human and machine.  Uses algorithms to learn from data.  Aids in identification of key trends that otherwise may be missed  Can contribute to the modification of maintenance programs to improve efficiency
  • 66. Conclusion  Everything discussed builds on one another  Impact is not just limited to Maintenance
  • 67.
  • 68. Requirements Verification • Passenger transport • This aircraft can operate as a commercial passenger carrying flight and an extended range of passenger carrying operations. • 250 – 400 passengers depending on configuration • Aircraft can carry a maximum of 305 Passengers • Operating altitude = 50,000 ft • Cruise altitude is at 50,ooo ft • Reduced fuel consumption, 20% less than 777 • Fuel consumption is 20% less per engine • Range min 4500nm • Aircraft range is 4500nm • High speed subsonic M=.95 • Aircraft cruise speed is in High subsonic region at M=0.9 • Major maintenance span increased 25% over B777 • Major maintenance span increased
  • 70. References Bertin, John J., and Cummings, Russell M., Aerodynamics for Engineers, 5th Ed., Pearson, New Jersey Component Weights." n.d. Document. 15 September 2011. <http://adg.stanford.edu/aa241/structures/componentweight.html>. Allen, Mike. "Alternative Fuels to Gasoline - Cost of Alternative Fuels - Popular Mechanics." Automotive Care, Home Improvement, Tools, DIY Tips - Popular Mechanics. Popular Mechanics, 1 May 2006. Web. 19 Oct. 2011. <http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/alternative-fuel/news/2690341>. "Jatropha Advantages - Benefits." PlantOils.in - The Home of Plant Oils Online. Oil from Jatropha. Web. 19 Oct. 2011. <http://www.plantoils.in/portal/jatropha/add/adv/adv.html>. Kinder, Dr. James D., and Timothy Rahmes. "Evaluation of Bio-Derived Synthetic." Evaluation of Bio-Derived Synthetic. The Boeing Company, June 2009. Web. Oct. 2011. <http://www.ascension-publishing.com/BIZ/Bio-SPK.pdf>. Raymer, Daniel P. Aircraft Design: a Conceptual Approach. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1989. Print. Rolls Royce UltraFan. Rolls Royce. Web. 12 Mar. 2014. < http://www.rolls- royce.com/news/press_releases/2014/260214_next-generation.jsp>.