1. The document summarizes work done to improve Afrigap's tools, content, and community from November 2012 to June 2013.
2. For tools, a domain and subdomains were added, translations enabled, and social media accounts created. However, the website is now outdated technically.
3. For content, over 90 new items were added in 6 months by expanding content sources. Access is now by country but inequality remains between topics, languages, and countries.
4. For community, visits from Africa increased from 14% to 35% but more work is needed to engage the target African audience qualitatively and quantitatively.
4. 1. Tools
Situation in November 2012
1. One global portal
2. In English only
3. No space for interaction with visitors
4. No social media tools
Afrigap was the sum of the content about Africa
No statistics were possible
5. 1. Tools
What was done
1. Afrigap domain and sub-domain
2. Translation possible in French
3. Facebook, Scoop It, Twitter accounts
4. Forum and comments available
New opportunities to reach the target audiences
Statistics enable monitoring and evolution
6. 1. Tools
Technical limits
1. The website is old now (2009), technically
and graphically
2. Several layers of development co-exist
3. Everything is shared, i.e what is technically
done somewhere on the site is replicated
everywhere
7. 2. Content
• 340 « African » pages since the beginning
• News, resources, events
• Global scan for content
Situation in November 2012
Around 100 items/year
All the countries are not covered
Access by item and date, not by country
8. 2. Content
What was done
• 90 new items in 6 months
• Content research is not only in English but also in French
and Portuguese
• Extended daily scan: 150 specific RSS feeds, 106 twitter
accounts, 60 FB pages, 6 scoop.it, newsletters…
• New access: by country
• New items: initiatives, organizations
Time consuming
Increasing need of tools and strategy
Inequality between countries, languages & topics
is lower but still remains
9. 3. Community
Situation in November 2012 (1/2)
• GAP statistics : 100 visits/day
• 14% of the visits came from Africa
(= 6500 visits from Africa in 2012)
• 5 countries = 50% of the visits ; 10 countries = 75%
10. 3. Community
Situation in November 2012 (2/2)
• Mostly English-speaking countries
(3.6% from French-speaking
countries)
• 9 countries came less than 10
times/year
• Referents websites are out of the
continent
• No African trafic from Facebook
No qualitative knowledge about the users
Plenty of space for community development
11. 3. Community
What was done
• 500 visits/months
• 35% from Africa
• Qualified contacts list (work in progress)
• Outreach strategy initiated
• Interaction tools animated and monitored
• Promotion: flyers, meetings…
Not enough visitors from Africa
Balance to be done between quantity & quality