Assignment Rubric-Review of the Literature Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary Score Introduction to the Problem (20%) Introduces clinical issue or concern with reference to data to support the need for change Lacking a problem statement or significant background information to support the problem. No data present to support the issue. 0-11 points Problem statement present, but unclear. Some background information present, but does not full elaborate on the clinical issue. Minimal data, or data not from a scholarly source. 12-15 points Provides a problem statement of the clinical issue to be research and provides some background to the topic. There is some data provided to support the need to examine possible interventions. 16-17 points Provides a clear statement of the clinical issue to be researched and provides thorough background to the topic . Data provided to support need to examine possible interventions. 18-20 points PICOT Question and Search Strategy (15 %) Asks a relevant clinical inquiry in proper PICOT format PICOT question only includes 1 or 2 components required. Minimal or no discussion of search strategy, only discusses 1 of the required components. 0-9 points PICOT question correctly worded with 2 or 3 components included (T is optional). Search strategy is discussed, but missing 2 of the required components. 10-11 points PICOT question correctly worded with 3 or 4 components included( T is optional). Search strategy is clear, but missing 1 of the following: key words, limiters, or total number of articles used. 12-13 points PICOT question correctly worded with all 4 or 5 components present (T is optional). Clearly stated search technique stated. 14- 15 points EBP Summary (25%) Summarized the body of literature surrounding chosen issue Minimal information regarding the findings of the literature review regarding problem is presented. Information unclear regarding recommendations, levels of evidence not provided. 0-16 points Summary of findings is unclear or summary of effectiveness of recommendationsare unclear or did not include levels of evidence. 17-19 points Major summary findings related to the problem statement and recommendations are presented. Included levels of evidence for each articles. 20-21 points Summmary of findings related to the problem statement and recommendations are clearly articulated. Included levels of evidence for articles. 23-25 points Recommendations for Practice (20%) Applies information gained from literature review to current practices Makes incorrect assumptions on applicability of findings into clinical practice or there is no discussion of clinical applicability 0-11 points Very limited discussion of findings as related to clinical practice, does not consider clinical/patient factors. 12-15 points Some discussion of findings and their applicability to clinical practice. 16-17 points Analyzes findings from the l ...