1. Leading Across University Units
DEVELOP ING A CAMPUS-WIDE
WE L COME WEEK
PRESENTED BY:
BETH LINGREN CLARK
JENNY PORTER
ORIENTATION & FIRST-YEAR PROGRAMS
2. Presentation Overview
Building a Case for Collaboration
Benefits of Collaboration
Understanding the University Community
Welcome Week Stakeholders, Structure, Strategies
Developing Intentional Content
Impact of Process
Steps to Partnerships
3. Welcome Week Objectives
Welcome Week is designed to engage the campus community in creating a
meaningful University experience for first-year students that will:
Begin to build a sense of community
Assist students in their adjustment to the campus environment and
campus life
Provide students an opportunity to have and maintain meaningful
relationships with students, faculty, staff and surrounding community
Allow students to navigate the campus while discovering and accessing the
multitude of resources and opportunities available at the University
Provide leadership opportunities for current students to enhance their
leadership development and commitment to the University
4. Building a Case for Collaboration
Good practice “initiates educational partnerships and
develops structures that support collaboration….
Collaboration involves all aspects of the community in the
development and implementation of institutional goals and
reminds participants of their common commitment to
students and their learning” (p. 5).
Joint statement on Principles of Good Practice for Student Affairs,
ACPA and NASPA (1997)
5. Building a Case for Collaboration
Effectiveness is heavily dependent upon the degree to which
mutually beneficial relationships within the campus and
community are cultivated.
Those most effective are active with campus/community and
involve others in policies, programs, staffing, and evaluation.
Best way to fail is when leaders isolate themselves, thinking that
they can do their jobs without involving others.
Sandeen (2000)
6. Benefits of Collaboration
Improved understanding and support of initiatives by
stakeholders
A greater sense of community on campus
Better problem solving
Higher quality programs
Ultimately, enhanced education for students
Sandeen (2000)
7. Understanding the University Community
Organizational culture Guide the behavior of
involves understanding individuals and groups
collective, mutually
shaping patterns of: Provide frames of reference
Institutional history for interpreting the
Mission
meanings of events and
Physical settings actions on and off campus.
Norms (p. 2)
Traditions Kuh (1993)
Values
Practices
Beliefs
Assumptions
8. Understanding Campus Culture
What basic assumptions exist among the campus
constituents?
What do campus constituents value in the welcome week
process?
What organizational cultural values and beliefs are
perpetuated through the institutional traditions?
How are problems solved within the process?
How is change or adversity in programming managed?
9. Background-The 5 Year Process
2003: Idea: “Let’s have a Welcome Week!”
2004: Identification of Stakeholder Concerns
• Welcome Week plans suspended
2005: Realization of University Culture
2006: Connection to Stakeholder Values
• Welcome Week plans resume in alignment w Strategic Positioning
2007: Action in Planning
2008: Implementation (finally!)
10. Campus Stakeholders
Colleges
Housing & Residential Life
Student Unions & Activities
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Office for Student Affairs
Recreational Sports
Intercollegiate Athletics
Many others…
11. Welcome Week Committee Structure
Welcome Week Advisory Committee
College Programming
Program Logistics
Transitioning Students to College
Commuter Student Programs
Entertainment/Side Trips/Community Service
Communications
Finance/Budget/Sponsorships
Evaluation & Assessment
Student Leader Training
New Student Convocation
Student Advisory Committee
12. Welcome Week Committee Members
35+ Different Campus Units Represented
Academic Affairs & Provost’s Office
9 Undergraduate Education
8 Office for Student Affairs
3 Office of Equity & Diversity
University Services
3 Auxiliary Services
2 Facilities Management
2 Public Safety
7 Freshman Admitting Colleges
Intercollegiate Athletics
13. Welcome Week Strategies
60+ Individual Unit Meetings
Kept notes spreadsheet to track meetings, concerns and how
they’ve been addressed; demonstrated intentionality
Timeline Awareness
Communication was developed in stages to bring awareness to
students (Admissions & Housing start early!)
“Dog & Pony Show”
10+ Campus Information Sessions spread word of Welcome
Week to different populations (faculty, staff, advisors, etc)
14. Welcome Week Strategies
Shared Progress at Welcome Week Advisory Meeting
Continual updates demonstrated progress and investment in
program; meetings were rarely cancelled!
Internal Regroup Meetings
Beth, Jenny & James met consistently in 2007/2008 to review
notes, determine unresolved issues and next steps
Mapped Content of Program Events
Kept assessment at forefront of programming by mapping
content of program events to Student Development & Learning
Outcomes
15. Developing Intentional Content
Guiding documents:
Program objectives
Student Learning & Development Outcomes
Overarching purpose for each day
Program unit descriptions
Mapping documents
Assessment plan
16. Welcome Week Major Themes
Academic & Career Expectations
Health, Safety and Wellness
Diversity & Community
Sustainability
Student Engagement
Money Management
17. Impact of Process
Builds trust
Fosters inclusiveness
Contributes to sense of community and common goal
Creates sense of ownership in process – “buy-in”
Allows for innovation and transformational change
Sets the foundation with new students regarding
expectations and resources
Increase in student retention and student satisfaction
18. Simple Steps to Partnerships
Understand your organization/University
Spend time cultivating, managing and supporting
relationships
Learn both parties role in the institution
Value multiple perspectives
Negotiate mutual wins- concede when necessary
Communicate throughout process
Evaluate and involve others in proposed changes
Be a good partner – could lead to additional
partners
20. References
American College Personnel Association (ACPA), & National Association of Student Personnel
Administrators (NASPA). (1997). Principles of good practice for student affairs. Washington,
DC: Authors.
Farmer, D.W. (1990). Strategies for change. In D.W. Steeples (Ed.), Managing change in
higher education (New Directions for Higher Education No. 71, pp. 7-18). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Kuh, G.D. (Ed.). (1993). Using cultural perspectives in student affairs work. Washington,
D.C.: American College Personnel Association.
Lingren Clark, B.M. & Weigand, M.J. (2010). Building the case for collaboration in orientation
programs: Campus culture, politics, and power. In T. Skipper & J. Ward-Roof (Eds.),
Designing Successful transitions: A guide to orienting students to college (3rd ed.) anticipated
published date spring 2010. Columbia, SC: The National Resource Center on the First Year
Experience and Students in Transition and National Orientation Directors Association.
Moore, P. L. (2000). The political dimensions of decision making. In M. J. Barr & M. K. Desler
(Eds.), The handbook of student affairs administration (2nd ed., pp. 178-196). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Sandeen, C. A. (2000). Developing effective campus and community relationships. In M. J.
Barr & M. K. Desler (Eds.), The handbook of student affairs administration (2nd ed.,pp.
377-392). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.