This paper deals with national data standardization efforts in Denmark and discusses the role Topic Maps – and topic maps – may play in a new standardization strategy currently being considered by the Danish National IT and Telecom Agency. The strategy entails a paradigm shift from syntactic data standards based on XML schema to a more semantically based approach involving, among other things, the development, publishing and sharing of so-called definitions. The paper accounts for the historical, political and technical context of the strategy pointing out some of the opportunities and constraints this context poses for the introduction and application of Topic Maps as a recognized “data standardization standard” in Denmark.
2. ”There is something rotten in the state of Denmark”- Shakespeare (1601) 2009: Challenges => modernization of the public sector => digitalization => interoperability
3. To beor not to be – standardizing * 2001: It standardizationeffortstakingoff 2006: B103 – Parliament voting for open standards in Danish e-goverment 2008: Seven sets of open standards made compulsoryincluding web standards, document standards and data standards Where is TopicMaps …? * … that’sone of the questions
4. Data standardization in Denmark Background and status New strategybeingimplemented by ITST (the national agency for It and Telecom) Technologicalinfrastructure Paradigmshift from syntax to semanticsorevensubject-centricthinking … Why not TM? Agenda
5. Data standards - OIOXML OIOXML schemas Domain schemas Corecomponents
6. Problems with OIOXML schemas Content Little documentation Whatlegislation? Whatcontexts? Whatprojects, web services, etc. Findability and usability Uploading Organizing Viewing Concepts No real semantics: <MaritalStatusCode> married divorced widow registeredpartnership abolition of partnership longestliving partner deceased unmarried </MaritalStatusCode> What do youread, my lord? Words, words, words
7. A new strategy in the pipeline Taxonomies Concept systems Semantic definitions Message definitions Data definitions OIOXML schemas WDSL files
9. From concept systems to taxonomies and thesauri FORM – a reference model of public services in Denmark Social services Benefits Individualbenefits Action Allocation of housingbenefit Object
11. Semantic definition From semantics to syntax Semantic definition client has client status is a Data definition Client Client_status: custody, … Semantic definition custody “Though this be madness, yet there is method in it” OIOXML <ClientStatusCode> <enumerationvalue =”custody” /> … </ClientStatusCode>
12. Conceptuallayer Concept systems and taxonomies = TAO topics/subjects, properties, associations, roles Semantic definition = PSI names, descriptions, explanations, etc. of subjects (in oneor more languages) Contentorresourcelayer OIOXML schemas, data definitions, wsdl files = occurrences/addressablesubjects Embedded OIO schemas = part-whole associations betweenaddressablesubjects, etc. TM model, really
13. So, why not simplyadopt TM as a unifying model or standardfor representing and organizing ”data standards data” in Denmark …? Instead an entirely new OIOXML language is beingdeveloped … Thisquestionbecomeseven more relevant …
14. Web 2.0 platform (Digitaliser.dk) Information architecturecenteredongroups Functionality for news, debates, usernetworks, etc. Tagging as primaryorganizationvehicle REST API Resources, representations and structured URL’s Finding, publishing and sharing .. Prediction: a direneed for an organizational/navigationaloverlayintegratingdistributedconceptual information, resources and metadata onDigitaliser.dk
15. Why not adopt TM as a unifyingtechnology for organizing and integrating data standards contentonDigitaliser.dk (and elsewhere)?
16.
17. TopicMaps as a technologyworking ”covertly” behind the scenes ortopicmaps as accessible information products in theirown right?
19. The vision of OIO TopicMaps … Public institutions and authorities Public services (e.g. FORM) Integration Public web services Coreconcepts Laws and guidelines Workflows
21. General lack of knowledge ”TopicMaps is a metadata standard like Dublin Core” ”Conceptslikesubject, topic, identity and mergingaresimplytoohard to explain” ”Weare not havingthat RDF and OWL stuff, thereforewecannotadopt TM either” The TM vocabularydoes not translateveryeasilyinto Danish Why is TM not a national standard? And of coursewe do not have a Lars Marius or Steve P …
23. Play the standard card (”TM is an international ISO standard, youknow”)? Create solutions! (chicken and egg problem) RDF: friendorfoe? The ”versatility problem”: promoting TM as Semantic Web technology, metadata format, orwhat? So, whatshouldwe do? PerhapsDigitaliser.dkwillsolve the problem for us … ”The rest is silence!”