This document discusses and comments on the paper "Can subjectivism and methodological individualism survive neuroeconomics, and vice-versa?". It notes that the paper addresses two main issues: whether subjectivism and methodological individualism can survive with neuroeconomics, and if neuroeconomics can survive criticism that it is not revolutionary. The commenter leaves some comments on aspects they liked and were puzzled by in the paper. They also provide two additional thoughts, noting that economic and neuropsychology disciplines may have different objectives, and that there seem to be two papers addressed - a theoretical one on demarcation of fields, and a historical one on Hayek's views relating to today's neuroeconomics.

1. Comments on: Can subjectivism and methodological individualism survive neuroeconomics, and vice-versa? By Jan Willem Lindemans Federica Russo Philosophy, Louvain & Kent