Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
How to Knock Down a Silo With a Hammer: An Easy-to-Follow Roadmap to Execute FLAWLESS Cross-Channel, Integrated Fundraising
1. How to Knock Down a Silo with a Hammer
an easy-to-follow roadmap to execute
FLAWLESS cross-channel,
integrated fundraising
2. Today’s Journey
1) Integration: Some quick definitions and perspective
2) Futurology: What’s your integrated donor going to be like?
3) The Need: The Integrated (multi-channel) Benchmarking and
Analysis
4) The Value: What’s the value of being integrated?
5) The Structure: How are you set up internally for integrated success?
6) Facilitation and the Balanced Scorecard: How do you get to an
integrated plan?
7) Evidence – Put It All Together: What does integration look like in
the real world?
4. Integration
A planned
marketing mix is
“ The whole is
more effective
greater than the The “Halo”
than a random
sum of the effect
selection of
parts”
distribution
channels
6. Integration needs to take place in more than one direction
A
n
o
u
q
s
c
t
i
i
i
A
n
o
u
q
s
c
t
i
i
i
In a
m
D
n
p
o
e
e
v
e
t
l
m
D
n
p
o
e
e
v
e
t
l
D
o
n
o
r
D
o
n
o
r
chronological
customer
w
R
n
a
e
e
l
w
R
n
a
e
e
l
Vertically
Vertically contact flow
Theme Messaging Style
Horizontally
7. The three tactical levers in integrated
fundraising
Acquisition
Donor
Renewal
Development
8. Integration to Grow Your Pyramid
Wills
Major
Monthly
Wills
Major
Monthly One-off
One-off
Prospect
Prospects
9. Integration for the Whole Pyramid
he cultivation survey:
• Sent to 57,400 donors
• 3 key segments: Monthly, Active &
Lapsed
• 5,530 responses (response rate of 11%)
• Raised $17,574 – a bonus!
• Reactivated 30 donors
• Found 85 expectances and 292 legacy
leads
• 143 middle and major donor leads!
• Key: shared budgeting!
10. Online – planned gifts and major
gifts…
A recent online
survey found
15. Task #1: How will you
build an integrated
fundraising pipeline?
16. Futurology as a way to
plan for your integrated
fundraising success
17. The Future Integrated Donor
Hyper- Customized
Ego- Tribute Hyper-
adventure Workplace
philanthropy Mania choice
giving giving
The need to
Feeling the
tell the world Feeling The last
need to be The death of
about your young and opportunity
their own unrestricted
parents and having fun in the 21st
fundraising giving
friends and while giving century?
brand
family
08/13/12 Proprietary & Confidential Slide 17
26. 78 million boomers in the US are
beginning to retire… one survey
found ½ want to have a positive
social impact*…why not give
them something to do…
* NYTimes, Nicolas Kristof
27. As one boomer says on helping
charities: “It wasn’t a matter of
being a Mother Teresa. It was a
matter of, ‘Boy, that sounds like
fun!”…
* NYTimes, Nicolas Kristof
32. Kiva – LOAN/GIVE
Oxfam Canada populates the back
end
people can choose country, theme,
project and then give money, make
a loan, make a team or personal
page…
33.
34. The last physical place of common
purpose?
And it may be one of the last
places where you won’t need to
get permission to ask them to get
involved financially…
Executive Question: What is the
average cost to raise a dollar
for workplace giving?
7 cents to raise a Dollar
35. Automated
counter –
demonstrates
impact
Matching
gift
component
37. Depts &
Individuals
can create
their own
fundraising
webpages
Nothing like
some
friendly
competition!
38. Task #2: on a scale of 1 to 5 (with 5
being completely prepared), score your
organization on:
• Ego-philanthropy
• Tribute Mania
• Hyper-adventure giving
• Hyper-choice
• Customized Workplace giving
40. The Integrated Need
1) Nonprofit offline donors are aging
2) Donor files and acquisition list sources are shrinking
3) Revenues are flat and–in many cases–are falling
4) Direct mail costs are increasing/ fundraising margins
are shrinking
Nonprofits need (younger) more valuable donors
41. Generational
Matures
Giving 65+ year
old
79% Give
30.8M donors
$1066 yr/avg
67% Give
Total annual giving ($)
6.3 charities
52.2M donors $32.7 B/yr
$901 yr/avg
5.2 charities
$47.1 B/yr
58% Give
35.9M donors
$796 yr/avg
4.2 charities
$35.9 B/yr
56% Give
28.5M donors
$341 yr/avg
3.6 charities
$9.7B/yr
Giving (%)
42.
43. Canadian Generational Giving
$1,000 66% Give 65+ year old
5.7M donors
$900 $725 yr/avg 73% Give
4.9 charities
Civics 3.2M donors
$800 $4.1 B/yr $833 yr/avg
Boomers 5.3 charities
$700 47-65 year old $2.6 B/yr
$600
Gen X
$500
20-30 year old 61% Give
$400 4.2M donors
55% Give $549 yr/avg
Gen Y
$300 2.7M donors 4.1 charities
$325 yr/avg $2.3 B/yr
G
A
u
n
e
a
g
v
r
i
l
$200 3.5 charities
$.8 B/yr 31-46 year old
$100
$-
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent Giving
44. And then there is Gen Z…
of the top 10
fundraisers for an
organization that
raises over $90 million
a year are under 15
xecutive Question: Do
you have an integrated
plan for supporters
under 15?
45. Task #3: draw your
generational giving circles
for your organization
46. Giving Channels and generations…
% donated this way in last 2 years (total) GEN Y GEN X BOOMERS MATURES
48% 57% 52% 48%
26% 43% 54% 77%
28% 35% 32% 30%
29% 35% 31% 25%
22% 28% 28% 31%
22% 22% 27% 35%
25% 27% 17% 12%
8% 10% 16% 25%
11% 17% 14% 11%
Emerging
Channel
14% 13% 4% 2%
9% 6% 4% 2%
49. Value of Multi-Channel: Loyalty – and
this is missing larger gifts…
Annual Donor Value1 Retention Rate2
$255.74
82.3%
$191.35
70.1%
62.3%
$102.64
Sources:
1. Convio / Strategic One White Paper: Integrating Online Marketing (eCRM) with Direct Mail Fundraising: Adding a New Communication
and Donation Channel Increases Donations; total contributions over 12 month period, excluding $10k+ gifts for SPCA of Texas
2. Ibid. Comparison of retention rates for multi-year donors, SPCA of Texas
51. Organizational Structure
Traditional
Separate Metrics &
Communications IT
Team for Online
Marketing
Disparate (Sometimes Development
Conflicting) Goals
Inconsistent Voices Government
Representing Others (?)
Affairs
Organization
52. Organizational Structure
Coordinated
Communications IT
Shared Metrics
Thematically Coordinating
Integrated Teams
Coordinated Government
Appeals Development
Affairs
53. Organizational Structure
Optimized Coordinating
Teams
Unified Strategy &
Full Integration
Across Channel
Managers
Online Communications Marketing
Development
54. Task #4: on a scale of 1 to 10…
with 1 being traditional; 5 being
coordinated; and 10 being
Optimized…
Where do you fall on the integrated
structure spectrum?
55. The Balanced Scorecard
The Dramatic Oversimplifcation of Integrated
Fundraising, Marketing, Communications and
Campaigning or
Putting Your Organization on One Sheet of Paper
56. Your Mission
Alumni Relations
Measurements: % of contact Marketing
information for different Measurements:
alumni cohorts (per channel); Branding
% who attend events; % of perception
recent grads who give statistics,
(mobile, monthly, etc)
Internal Perspective Measurements: internal cooperation
(culture, structure, reporting);
Learning and Growth Measurements: Courses, Qualifications,
Proven Application of New Knowledge
62. Greenpeace – love em or hate em…
Brand is perceived as authentic
They have created a culture, and
structure, of integrated fundraising
innovation...
63. “Set up to nurture real innovations or
completely new projects and ideas
“Keep the fund small, keep the money
moving fast”
67. Knock Down a Wall!
50% converted
to monthly
7.6 million
170,658 called 9.65% Average gift giving LTV
dollars
on their mobile conversion to 3.28 (over 5
phones monthly dollars/month years)
giving: 15,388
72. Why did it make sense for MADD?
Gen Y Boomers
Mainstream media 27% Mainstream media 28%
Word of mouth 22% Mail 19%
School 18% Word of mouth 16%
Peer to peer event 14% Work/job 11%
Gen X Civics
Mainstream media 24% Mail 35%
Word of mouth 18% Mainstream media 24%
Mail 16% Word of mouth 18%
Peer to peer event 11%
Work/job 11%
Product purchase 11%
74. Customer Service
They NEVER looked for past experience for
non-executive positions. They looked for:
1.attitude;
2.manners;
3.ability to problem solve;
4.to engage with the customer
IS THIS YOUR CRITERIA FOR YOUR
INTEGRATED FUNDRAISERS?
75. So…
To create an excellent, integrated marketing
organization, you need:
1 2 3 4
Innovation
structures
Culture that is not internally that Culture that can Culture that is
resistant to spur change, ‘train’ service open to external
change testing and excellence innovation
integrated
cooperation
77. A Public Broadcaster
rand is perceived as
authentic
o integrated fundraising
execution
78. Things needed to be improved
nd gift conversion dropped from 83% to 30%
et loss of donors since 2005.
TV of donors decreasing significantly since 2001
agazine, which was the primary stewardship vehicle,
stopped in 2007.
hare of voice, i.e.number of times donors hear from TVO
in a year, has decreased.
79. It would take an integrated solution…
enior management support
ross departmental cooperation
reate an integrated plan and stick to it
83. Integrated Improvements
ade the Integrated Schedule
rought Back More Targeted, and Aggressive, Direct Mail
dded the Telephone
mproved stewardship multi-channel
mproved Monthly Giving online and offline
0% increase in revenue in Q4 of 2010 – first integrated
year
84. Results – 2010 and 2011
15% increase in
number of gifts
per donor over 2
years
80% increase in
average gift over 2
years
Companies are often most successful when the campaign to runs for a specific timeframe (e.g. six weeks); also has a campaign goal se; can be structured as a inter-office competition; and has a matching gift - through a corporate contribution 12-08-13
12-08-13
12-08-13
Organizations can maximize the value of donor relationships with the use of multi-channel strategies.
(64% of US adults qualified About 148 million donors) Pie Chart size represents size of ADULT population for that Generation (Animated- Matures First) Matures have the highest percentage of donors. Highest yearly average donation, and, the highest aggregate projected donation. But, they are our smallest population and have one of the smallest actual number of donors by Generation . Plus, by virtue of their age, their lifetime potential is dwindling. Boomers average yearly donation is smaller than matures, but have a high percentage of donors, and given their population size, actually generate more in dollars than any other generation. Our Gen Xers, the next largest population actually generate more than Matures, due to donor population size. Their average annual contribution is lower vs. older groups, but still impressive. Plus, their lifetime potential is much greater. Gen Y is more about future potential, with over half currently donating, posting annual contributions averaging about $340, generating over $28 B a year. Another trend we see is that younger generations give give to fewer charities, but when they give, they give similar amounts as older donors Spend a lot of time focused and soliciting these groups (point to Matures), But the vast majority of the donor universe are Boomers, Gen Y and X – represent huge opportunity in terms of sheer numbers, and will only get more valuable (from a dollar perspective) over time Hence as a fundraiser, if you have the ability to attract them, they can be economic in current terms, and of course constitute higher potential life time value, plus contribute to outreach due to their social networks/ peer influence. Hence as a fundraiser, if you have the ability to attract them, they can be economic in current terms, and of course constitute higher potential life time value, plus contribute to outreach due to their social networks/ peer influence. Question wording: Q4. Approximately how many nonprofit organizations and charitable causes have you donated to in the past 12 months? Q6. Approximately how much do you give in total each year to all charitable or cause-oriented organizations, excluding your school and place of worship? Blue numbering in the table on the right indicates significance at the 95% confidence level
Mike To be donor centric – you have to understand who your donors are, how they come to you and how the want to interact with you
Mike
Lot of information on this chart. Two most common ways to “give back” are what I know some of you refer to as “tipping” – leaving a buck for charity here or there at the supermarket, etc; and of course check by mail. But what I really want to focus on is some of the generational differences. Gen Y most likely to give in small ways -- $1 at checkout type of gift. No one prevalent channel beyond that -- as likely to give via website as check, same numbers at gift shop, event, etc. More than 1-in-10 say they have participated in mobile philanthropy. Giving thru SM more prevalent than other generations, but still small. Gen X true multi-channel givers -- more likely to give through many of these channels than other generations. Most likely to make online donations (though still a little less than good old check). Both X and Y more likely to participate in something like Gap Red campaign where part of the proceeds fr third party vendor purchase goes to charity. In focus groups we heard that this is a way that they can easily and affordably be charitable. Win-win (i.e. Gap – “I shop there anyway, and it’s a way to feel good”). X using monthly debit more than other cohorts. –NOT REALLY -- THE DIFFERENCE IS WITHIN THE MOE Matures (and Boomers) most likely to mail in a check. A third of Matures have made tribute gifts. More have given via phone solicitation than other generations (though still just a quarter). Q7: Which of the following giving methods have you used in the past 2 years (select all that apply). Bold numbering in the table on the right indicates significance at the 95% confidence level
Lot of information on this chart. Two most common ways to “give back” are what I know some of you refer to as “tipping” – leaving a buck for charity here or there at the supermarket, etc; and of course check by mail. But what I really want to focus on is some of the generational differences. Gen Y most likely to give in small ways -- $1 at checkout type of gift. No one prevalent channel beyond that -- as likely to give via website as check, same numbers at gift shop, event, etc. More than 1-in-10 say they have participated in mobile philanthropy. Giving thru SM more prevalent than other generations, but still small. Gen X true multi-channel givers -- more likely to give through many of these channels than other generations. Most likely to make online donations (though still a little less than good old check). Both X and Y more likely to participate in something like Gap Red campaign where part of the proceeds fr third party vendor purchase goes to charity. In focus groups we heard that this is a way that they can easily and affordably be charitable. Win-win (i.e. Gap – “I shop there anyway, and it’s a way to feel good”). X using monthly debit more than other cohorts. –NOT REALLY -- THE DIFFERENCE IS WITHIN THE MOE Matures (and Boomers) most likely to mail in a check. A third of Matures have made tribute gifts. More have given via phone solicitation than other generations (though still just a quarter). Q7: Which of the following giving methods have you used in the past 2 years (select all that apply). Bold numbering in the table on the right indicates significance at the 95% confidence level
12-08-13
12-08-13
12-08-13
12-08-13
12-08-13
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike Given that the vast majority of donor acquisition is through direct mail, it is important for us to understand how different generations of donors first learned about their top charities, and the relative importance of mail Mail the dominant channel for Matures, but … Mainstream media and WOM top prospecting channels across age cohorts WOM, school , and P2P fundraising more prevalent for Gen Y (not direct) What we also see on this chart is the importance of a cradle-to-grave strategy for building relationships. Even a quarter of Boomers say that they first learned about a top charity during childhood What is also interesting is what IS NOT a top prospect channel – and that is websites (5%) and social networking site (4%). Emerges as a research tool Q10: How did you first learn about (top charity)? Select all that apply. [Top channels cited above] Q11: How old were you when you first learned about (top charity)? (Best guess is fine) Q9: For how long have you been supporting (top charity)? [Average # of years cited]