More Related Content Similar to Extension Forestry in the U.S.: A national review of state-level programs (20) Extension Forestry in the U.S.: A national review of state-level programs1. Extension Forestry
in the United States:
A NATIONAL REVIEW OF STATE-LEVEL
PROGRAMS
Eli Sagor, Amanda Kueper, Charles Blinn, and Dennis Becker
1
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
4. Two-stage data collection
Online survey
Telephone focus groups
Census of 50 state-level
Extension Forestry program
leaders
One for leaders of large state-level
programs: ≥9 FTE
November 2011 – February
2012
One for leaders of small programs:
≤1.7 FTE
Administered by phone, 90 minutes
100% response rate
4
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
9. Left side:
% states teaching
topic LESS now
than 5 years ago
Topics
Right side:
% states teaching
topic MORE now
than 5 years ago
9
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
10. Topics taught MORE now:
10
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
11. Topics taught LESS now:
11
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
14. Formats used MORE now:
14
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
15. Formats used LESS now:
15
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
17. Funding
Many report reductions in funds and FTE
capacity:
“…we’ve lost people significantly. We’ve lost three key
Extension specialists, and three field agents with no money
to replace any of those people. So, you know, the work has
just been spread around among the people that remain.”
17
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
18. Shift to competitive funding
Increasing volatility from year to year
Challenge for long-range planning
Programs end when funding expires
Benefit: Increased coordination, partnerships
Challenges meeting needs of tradition-bound audiences
18
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
19. Shift to competitive funding
Transition more challenging for small programs
Morale: “We’re one funding cycle away from real
problems.”
19
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
20. Shift to digital communications
and peer learning
“We feel like this is just… the wave of the
future, this technology is how more and more
people are communicating and getting
information, and if we’re not a part of this
game…, we’re just going to be left behind.”
Opportunity and necessity
20
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
23. Changing content
More instruction on forest
health, climate, digital mapping.
Few topics dropped: Expanding portfolio.
23
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
24. Changing relationships between
Extension and learners
More efficient, more accessible, but less
direct?
More coordination across
agencies, organizations.
24
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
25. Opportunity: More targeting
Focus on narrower audience segments most
likely to produce positive impact.
But… Tradition-bound audiences, public
support?
25
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
26. Conclusions
Extension is a bridge between profession and public
Expanding content portfolio and delivery toolkit
Funding changes affect small and large state programs
differently
26
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
27. Eli Sagor
esagor@umn.edu
(612) 624-6948
Amanda Kueper
Charlie Blinn
Dennis Becker
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities
Act, this PowerPoint is available in alternative formats upon request. Direct requests to the Extension Store at 800-876-8636.
27
Editor's Notes 52% of faculty capacity is specialists, 48% educators / agents Increasing expectations and declining resources leave us with our hands full at times. We need to help learners squeeze every ounce of value out of the work we put in.