pumpkin fruit fly, water melon fruit fly, cucumber fruit fly
GnRH Agonist vs GnRH Antagonist what to choose?
1. ISO 9001 :2008 CERTIFIED CENTER
New hope to
Infertile couples!
1
2. Dr. Ritu S Santwani M.B.B.S, MD, FICOG
IVF -Infertility (Test Tube Baby) Specialist
Director -Pune TestTube Baby Center
Center Address:
Liberty , Phase -2, C-6 , Opp Lane -5
North Main Road, Koregoan Park
Pune – 411001
http://www.punetesttubebabycenter.com
2
PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
6. THESE ARE TWO DRUGS USED
FOR THE SAME PURPOSE:
LH SUPPRESSION FROM
PITUTARY FOR PREVENTING
ENDOGENOUS LH PEAK SO WE
CAN TIME THE OOCYTE RETRIVAL
6PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
7. • The first report on use of GnRH agonist (buserelin) +
Gn for ovarian stimulation for IVF was in --- 1984
• Incidence of premature LH surge & subsequent
luteinization with Gn stim without GnRH agonist was
20 – 50 % ,leading to increased cancellation rates &
deleterious effects on fertilization/pregn rates.
7PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
8. • The receptors (R) after
intracellular synthesis are
randomly inserted into the cell
membrane.
• The R has 3 important
regions :
→ External -- to bind to the
hormone
→ Transmembrane region
→ Internal 8PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
9. 1. Activated Calmodulin
+
2. Activated PKC
↓
Cause release of
Gonadotophins (FSH & LH)
FLARE UP 4 times FSH and 10
times LH release
9PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
10. • Over the time b/o over abundance
of agonists with longer half life,
the dimer form of receptors is
favored and the receptors go into
the cell and cannot come back
so
• Cannot respond to subsequent
pulses of GnRH
• Thus the gonadotrops become
desensitised and this is called
down regulation of GnRH
receptors
11. • DESENSITIZATION
• When the GnRH receptors
exposed to GnRH agonists for
a prolonged period, the cells
lose their ability to respond to
the stimulus with their original
sensitivity.
• Process is rapid & reversible.
• Process operates at both the
receptor level & by post
receptor modification
12. Agonist is the ---- Conventional
---- Time tested & trusted
---- More efficacious
---- Many modifications
“ OLD IS GOLD “
12PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
13. Many treatment schedules with the use of
GnRH agonists in ART have been designed.
It has to be tailored as per the patient profile.
The 2 most widely used GnRH agonist protocol
in COS for ART are :
→ Long Luteal Protocol
→ Short Protocol
13
PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
16. -- The GnRH agonist is started on Day-21 of
the cycle preceeding tt.
-- GnRH agonist is continued in parallel along
with Gn.
-- Gn started after pituitary downregulation
Some modifications :
→ Long Follicular
→ Early cessation/Stop
→ Long Luteal Mini-dose
16PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
17. -- They utilize the initial temporary
flare effect of the agonist to
promote follicular recruitment
during menstruation before the
supressive action takes over.
-- More suitable for older patients
or poor responders.
Some modifications :
→ Ultrashort
→ Micro-dose Flare
17PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
18. The long mid-luteal protocol
has consistently been reported
to be more effective than
short or ultra-short protocols as
far as pregnancy rates are
concerned & the most recent
Cochrane review has confirmed
these.
Disadvantages : Higher cost as
more Gn used
18
PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
19. Agonists offers many advantages over
Antag..
Agonist long protocol : (Advantages)
1) Stable & low LH & P4 levels
throughout the stimulation phase.
2) Suppression of endogenous FSH
levels leading to a follicular cohort of
all small follicles at the initiation of
FSH stimulation
→in a synchronized follicular
development
19PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
20. 3) Agonist use is associated with ↑ HOXA 10 expression, so ↑ endometrial receptivity.
(Orvieto et al., 2008a )
4) Significantly higher number of oocytes and higher proportion of mature MII oocytes was
retrieved per patient randomized, in the GnRH agonist group Depalo et al. Reproductive
Biology and Endocrinology 2012
5) So increased chance of pregnancy in current as well as subsequent cycles with cryo-
preserved embryos.
6) Better programming of treatment schedule. Reduces the cycle cancellation rates (2%)
7) Can be used to induce final maturation & ovulation instead of hCG in antagonist protocol
8) Very good protocol for normal responders
20PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
21. 21
1) Longer pretreatment period required
2) Initial “flare up” of FSH & LH may lead to ovarian cyst formation.
3) Excessive follicle selection leading to higher incidence of OHSS, especially
in PCOS patients.
4) Over suppression in poor responders requiring a higher dose of
Gonadotropins or a poor response.
5) Higher incidence of multiple pregnancy.
6) Luteal phase support is required.
7) Increased total gonadotropins dose per
treatment cycle.
8) Higher cost
9) Daily administration
PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
22. 1) LH levels remain unsuppressed during the early follicular
phase, so ↑ LH, E2 & P4 as well.This adversely affects
endometrial receptivity, so pregnancy rates too.
2) High intercycle endogenous FSH concentration induces
secondary follicular recruitment, leading to asynchronous
follicular development.
22
PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
26. • Patients with an unfavorable prognosis (patients with repeated
IVF failure )
GnRH agonist protocol was superior, showing a significantly
higher clinical pregnancy rate, when compared with the
antagonist protocol
(20.8% versus 14.5%; P < 0.02).
Orvieto et al., 2009)
PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
33. 33
GnRH antagonists versus
agonist protocols in non
obese women with polycystic
ovarian syndrome showed
similar embryological &
clinical efficacy of both
protocol.
Kurzawa et al, J Assist Reprod Genet 2008
PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
34. 34PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
No difference between the two
protocols
In terms of quality of oocyte
morphology or oocyte dysmorphism.
Conclusion –
Oocyte dysmorphism was not
influenced by the type of pituitary
suppression.
Cota et al, Reprod Bio Endocrinol 2012
35. 35
Marci et al compared ovarian stimulation in women with high & normal body
mass index (BMI) in both agonist & antagonist protocols.
Patients with BMI >25kg /m2 were found to require a higher amount of
goandotropins in the agonist protocol compared to those with normal BMI.
Conclusion
Obesity could impair the ovarian response to gonadotropins
In patients with normal BMI clinical pregnancy rates were similar with both
protocols
Marci et al, Gynecol Endocrinol 2012
PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
36. Clear advantage was gained in duration of stimulation with
GnRH-anta in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF,
although there was no statistical difference in the number of
oocytes retrieved, the number of mature oocytes retrieved,
the CCR and CPR between GnRH-ant and GnRH-a protocols.
Comparisons of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol in
poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF Danhua Pu1,2,jie Wu1,2,*
and Jiayin Liu1,2 Human reproduction 2011
36PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
37. • A randomized prospective study compared an antagonist protocol with
a long agonist protocol in poor responders and concluded that there
were no significant difference in the cycle cancellation rates, duration of
stimulation, dosage of gonadotropins (a fixed dose was used), and mean
numbers of mature follicles, oocytes, and embryos obtained .
Cheung L-P, P-M, Lok I, Chiu T, Yeung S-Y, Tjer C-C, Haines C.GnRH
antagonist versus long GnRH agonist protocol in poor
respondersundergoing IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod
2005;20:616 –21
• The implantation rates were similar but the pregnancy rate was higher,
though not statistically significant, in the antagonist group.
37PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
38. 38
Not the preferred protocol
Why???
Down regulation of the hypothalamic pituitary ovarian axis prior
to gonadotrophins leads to over suppression of ovaries & hence
prolongation of follicular phase & increase in the number of
gonadotropins ampoules required for stimulation or poor
response.
PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
40. 40
No difference between both protocols regards pregnancy
losses.
No difference in major congenital malformations.
Neonatal outcome was also similar
Boerrigter et al, Human Reprod 2002
PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
44. 44
Various meta analysis have found no significant difference in the
live birth rates between the two protocols.
They concluded that the probability of live birth was not
dependent on the type of protocol used for stimulation
Kolibianakis et al Human Reprod Update 2006,
Tur Kaspe I & Ezcurra 2009
PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER
45. 45
Recent Cochrane review no significant difference between the
two protocols in terms of clinical pregnancy rates (CPR).
(odds ratio 0.86, AI – 95% confidence interval 0.69-1.08)
Al Inany et al, Cochrane data base Syst Rev 2011
PUNE TESTTUBE BABY CENTER