B08 B4pc 141 Diapo Amiotte En


Published on

Sixth annual International Conference of Territorial Intelligence "Tools and methods of Territorial Intelligence"

Published in: Technology, Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

B08 B4pc 141 Diapo Amiotte En

  1. 1. Possibilities of ICT and tool limits relative to sustainable development, participation and partnership Besançon 17 th October 2008 Laurent Amiotte-Suchet UFC
  2. 2. Quality Letter of Research Action : principles <ul><li>Principle 1: Mobilization of the territorial actors and resources </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Investigation of the target territory’s actors and resources </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Organization of actors/researchers partnerships </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Principle 2: Mutualisation of the whole of competences and knowledge </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Multidimensionality of the action-research </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Co-learning </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Principle 3: Responsibility of participants and involved institutions </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Organization of a collaborative management of the project </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Deontology and autonomy of participants </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Principle 4: Common property of the results of the Action-Research </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Regular evaluation of the impact on the territory </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Durability of the implemented actions </li></ul></ul>
  3. 3. Delivrable 49 <ul><li>Title : Possibilities of ICT and tool limits relative to sustainable development, participation and partnership </li></ul><ul><li>Objective : ITC potentialities panorama and tools’ limits with regard to the installation of a lasting cooperation partnership between researchers and terrain actors. </li></ul>
  4. 4. Difficulties in the use of ITC <ul><li>Intellectual baggage and technical knowledge (technology difficult to access requiring expert competences ) </li></ul><ul><li>Problems of a tools transfer resulting from the applied sciences and economy towards the social phenomena analysis. </li></ul>
  5. 5. Collaborative use of tools <ul><li>“ data” could not be built, analyzed and effectively used without in parallel the development of partnership steps, aiming to reinforce the collaboration between those having the competence to produce these data and those having a precise and close enough knowledge of the “terrain” to direct these same data structuring </li></ul>
  6. 6. FOUR TOOLS OF FAMILIES PROMOTING THE LASTING COOPERATIVE PARTICIPATION <ul><li>Communication tools </li></ul><ul><li>Information and database tools </li></ul><ul><li>Observation and analyzing tools </li></ul><ul><li>Management and projects’ evaluation tools </li></ul>
  7. 7. Communication tools <ul><li>E-mail, forums, collaborative workspaces, software of presentation (PowerPoint…) </li></ul><ul><li>Potentialities : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Network researchers and field actors </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Transformations on the decision-making processes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Traceability of the exchange activity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Encourages the individual participants’ responsibility </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Limits : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Several network (redundancy and contradiction between the ideas and documents exchange within the project) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Involuntary exclusion processes appears towards those using only too few the cooperative workspace </li></ul></ul>
  8. 8. Information and database tools <ul><li>Sites, internet portals, Data base (on ligne or not) </li></ul><ul><li>Potentialities : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Dynamic and evolutive consultation (according to various data accessibility levels) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Density of information and structured data </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Capacity to generate network (new partnerships) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Limits : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Readability and regular actualization </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Confidentiality of personal data </li></ul></ul>
  9. 9. Observation and analyzing tools <ul><li>Statistical and space analyzing software (Pragma, Anaconda,…) </li></ul><ul><li>Potentialities : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Field actors bring an intimate knowledge of the population-target </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Realization of a common territory diagnosis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Better familiarization with the operation of data processing tools </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Field actors can then find their place at the researchers sides in working groups </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Limits : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Accessibility of tools </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Researchers/terrain actors’ border redraw them during the analyzing phase </li></ul></ul>
  10. 10. Management and projects’ evaluation tools <ul><li>Tools permitting projects carriers to evaluate the real actions’ impact implemented on the concerned territory </li></ul><ul><li>Potentialities : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Common control of results </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Collectively shared identification of evaluation criteria </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Limits : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Evaluation takes the external expertise form which conclusions do not always satisfy the projects’ leaders </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Q uantitative tools can quickly be perceived like inapt to really take into account human impacts considered to be non quantifiable. </li></ul></ul>
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.