5. Current Context
Temporary ceasefires
No political dialogue yet
Security – attacks and fighting
continue in some areas
Community in conflict area have
seen increased military presence
Increased economic activity and
international investment
Investment leading to land
confiscation and displacement
• Lessening of travel restrictions
and some improvement in
transport links
• Limited health services by Gov
in ethnic conflict affected areas
• Gov allows INGOs to provide
some direct humanitarian
assistance
• Gov does not formally recognize
existing ethnic social structures
5
10. Comparison of key indicators of reproductive health
Eastern Burma
2008
Eastern Burma
2013
Burma
(National)
Thailand
Maternal Mortality
per 100,000 live births
721 n/a 200 26
Unmet need for family
planning
n/a 54.1% 19% 3.1%
Contraceptive prevalence 21.8% 26.7% 46% 79.6%
Antenatal care
at least one visit
n/a 60.4%
83.1% 98.6%
HISWG. 2015. Long road to Recovery – Ethnic and community based health organisations lead the way to better health in Eastern Burma.
www.hiswg.org
Parmar PK et al. Health and human rights in eastern Myanmar prior to political transition. BMC
Ministry of Health. 2013. Health in Myanmar
World Health Observatory. Data Repository. http://apps.who.int/gho/data
Some indicators were not comparable.
The Millennium Development Goal of 130
deaths per 100,000 live births by 2015
10
11. Barriers for accessing healthcare
Eastern Burma Thailand
Financial Ability to pay – informal fees,
transportation
Out of pocket payments 82%
Lack of health insurance
Lack of health insurance,
entitlement to public services
Ability to pay – fees, transportation
Rights/
Knowledge of rights
No birth certificate, health record
Militarization and restrictions on
movement
Fear of arrest/abuse of absent from
work
Work card retained by employer
Geography Remoteness
Lack of health and other
infrastructure
Remoteness – seafarers, remote,
highly mobile
Communication,
cultural factors
Language barriers
traditional beliefs
Language barriers
traditional beliefs
Time Time to travel to care Unable to take time from work
Adapted from Chalermpol Chamchan, Kanya Apipornchaisakul. 2012. A situation Analysis on HSS for Migrants in Thailand. Institute
for Population and social research, Mahidol University
11
17. Access to family planning
Legal barriers: abortion is
restricted
Technical barriers: Human
resources: providers knowledge;
some methods (eg IUD) are
restricted to specialist
Supply chain: availability is
limited in remote and conflict
affected communities
Social & Culture barriers:
Stigmatization: particularly for
young people, traditional
misbelief, Fear of side effects
17
Safe abortion is not provided by
the Burmese health system
Permanent family planning
methods are limited
Safe abortion is available in
Thailand, with some restrictions
under Thai law
Barriers for Burmese women:
Cost, language, fear, lack of
knowledge and beliefs, legal status
Resulting in 500‐600 women
treated at MTC for complications
from unsafe abortions
25. 3. Increase Access to Safe Abortion
Developed referral system with Mae Sot Hospital for patients
meeting 5 criteria
Maternal factors
Physical health concern
Maternal age > 35years due to increase risk of abnormality
Fetal factors
Fetal abnormally or chromosomal abnormalities
Psychosocial factors
Mental health evaluate by psychologist and psychiatrists
Rape (documented by police report)
women under 15years who has consensual sex with her boyfriend
Contraceptive failure ( Tubal ligation and IUD is eligible, must be evaluated by
hospital committee )
25
33. Further reading
Apple, B., & Martin, V: No Safe place: Burma’s Army and the Rape of Ethnic Women. Washington, D.C.: Refugees
International; 2013. http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs09/No_safe_place_Burmas_army.pdf
Batley R, Mcloughlin C. Engagement with non‐state service providers in fragile states: reconciling state building and
service delivery. Dev Pol Rev 2010; 28: 131
Chalermpol Chamchan, Kanya Apipornchaisakul. 2012. A situation Analysis on HSS for Migrants in Thailand. Institute for
Population and social research, Mahidol University
IHRC at Harvard Law School: War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity in Eastern Myanmar. Cambridge, MA; 2014.
http://hrp.law.harvard.edu/wp‐content/uploads/2014/11/2014.11.05‐IHRC‐Legal‐Memorandum.pdf
Karen Rivers Watch. 2014. Afraid to go home: Recent violent conflict and human rights abuses in Karen State
Low, S et al. Human resources for health: task shifting to promote basic health service delivery amongst IDPs in ethnic
health program service areas in eastern Burma/Myanmar. Global Health Action, North America, 7, sep. 2014. Available at:
http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/24937
MoH. 2012. Health in Myanmar. Government of Myanmar.
Risso‐Gill, Isabelle et al. Health system strengthening in Myanmar during political reforms: perspectives from international
agencies. Health Policy Planning. doi:10.1093/heapol/czt0
Sollom R, Richards AK, Parmar P, Mullany LC, Lian SB: Health and Human Rights in Chin State, Western Burma. PLoS
Med 2011, 8(2):e1001007.
TBC: Protection & Security Concerns in South East Burma/Myanmar (p. 17). Yangon, Myanmar 2014.
http://www.theborderconsortium.org/media/54376/report‐2014‐idp‐en.pdf
Ward J, If Not Now, When? Addressing Gender‐based Violence in Refugee, Internally Displaced, and Post‐Conflict Settings.
A Global Overview, RHRC Consortium, 2002.
WHO (2008). Task shifting: rational redistribution of tasks among health workforce teams: global recommendations and
guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
33