Tma02 part 2 extended

B8729250 H818 – TMA02 – Part 2 Extended Abstract Angela Phillips
The use of student generated webpages to improve
revision and ongoing mathematical development
Extended Abstract
Angela Maxine Phillips
Seaford Meadows, South Australia, 5169, Australia
INTRODUCTION
Revision is an area that is often not taught well in schools or in some cases taught at
all, (Slater, 2012) suggests. (Cohen, 2013) indicates that in study of revision
techniques used, 80% were ineffective and could even hinder learning. (Dunlosky, 2013)
states, “Moreover, students are responsible for regulating an increasing amount of
their learning as they progress from elementary grades through middle school and high
school to college. Lifelong learners also need to continue regulating their own learning.”
Therefore, it is vital that students are taught different effective techniques for
revision (Pinantoan, 2012). This project has been designed to give students the
opportunity to revise in different ways and produce a continually developing web based
revision resource.
The conference theme for the project will be focussing on implementation. The
implementation of a project has the most impact on the outcome of the project
(Durlak, 2011). The different stages of implementation of this project will be shared
on an open forum (Minnesota Department of Education, n.d.), to ensure that the
process will benefit not only the students involved in the project, but others who wish
to develop similar projects in the future. The project will be showcased in full using a
webpage, (Phillips-5, 2014).
The project has been run as a case study, (UNSW Australia, 2013) states, ”A good case
has the following features:
1. It is taken from real life (true identities may be concealed).
2. It consists of many parts and each part usually ends with problems and points
for discussion. There may not be a clear cut off point to the situation.
3. It includes sufficient information for the reader to treat problems and issues.
4. It is believable for the reader (the case contains the setting, personalities,
sequence of events, problems and conflicts).”
This form of presentation represents the most relevant method for the project. The
choice of presentation has been redefined, due to feedback from my peers undertaking

H818. A report of the case study will be produced and presented at the H818
Conference.
A limitation of this project is no research relating to the use of student generated web
pages to support revision has been located. Research into the use of student
generated blogs is available (Orlando, 2010), however this research is not related to
Mathematics.
The project will be run with one class, from one year group. The results of the project
will be analysed and the effectiveness of the project will be determined. The project
can then be refined to meet the initial aims.
PROJECT APPROACH
Following attendance at the ACEC 2014 conference in Adelaide and an inspiring
presentation from Henrietta Miller relating to revolutionising homework with students
blogs (Miller, 2014). The use of student generated webpages was selected to aid
revision.
After the project brief was selected a group of students needed to be chosen to trial
the project. A year 8 Mathematics class were chosen, because:
 Year 8 is the first year of Senior School in South Australia.
 The class had already been set periodic extended homework tasks, which
encourage creativity and problem solving.
 External examinations are not held for students in year 8.
 The students completed the Semester 2 Common Test at the end of November.
 The students had previously completed the Semester 1 Common Test and
therefore the students had experience of the revision completed in preparation
for the previous test.
“Expert teachers now are those who can bring together knowledge of subject matter, what
is good for learning, and technology (ICT)” (Australian Government Department of
Education, n.d.). The project has been designed to try and engage the areas of good
teaching and learning pedagogy, integrated with the use of technology. “Technological
Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) is a framework that identifies the knowledge
teachers need to teach effectively with technology” (TPACK, n.d.). The TPACK model
has been considered during the design of this project, figure 1.

Figure 1 - Reproduced by permission of the publisher, © 2012 by tpack.org
(Dunlosky, 2013) indicates that the following are high utility rating:
 Distributed practice, where a schedule of practice spreads out study activities
over time; and,
 Practice testing, which can include self-testing.
While the following were moderate utility rating:
 Elaborative interrogation, where the student generates and explanation for why
a concept is correct,
 Self-explanation, where the student describes each step of problem solving
questions; and,
 Interleaved practice, where different materials or topics are studied in a single
revision session.
Although evidence from (Dunlosky, 2013) is well researched, the study does not take
into account different ages groups, subjects or social economic statuses. Therefore,
other methods of learning that received low utility ratings were not excluded, if the
student wished to include them in their revision planning.
The learning activity was designed and put on the schools Learning Management System
(LMS). However, the activity was initially shared with teaching staff using LMS.
Feedback was received from two teachers, Michelle Payne (IT Integrator) and Sharon
Kennare (Senior Mathematics Teacher) from Westminster school. Michelle Payne
enhanced the activity, by suggesting several web based programs that could be used

for the activity. Sharon Kennare decided to use the activity with a class she teaches in
year 10. Figure 2, 3 and 4 show the activity from the LMS.
Figure 2
Figure 3

Figure 4
Once the activity had been reviewed by teaching staff, the activity was made available
to the students (Phillips-1, 2014). The activity was introduced in class and set for
homework. Standard revision activities were run during class time, to correspond with
similar activities in during Semester 1.
The students peer assessed each other’s webpages using Google Form Questionnaire
(Phillips-4, 2014). The feedback was then collated and distributed back to the
students, who were then asked to review the feedback of their pages and reviewed
their work.
The student generated webpages are available at
http://linoit.com/users/angphil/canvases/Year%208%20Revision%20Web%20Pages%2
02014 (Phillips-2, 2014).
The students completed the Semester 2 Common Test and then were given the
personal questionnaire, to complete to give their views of the activity and the impact on
the revision completed. Students were also asked to give their views on how likely they
were to continue to use the webpage for revision (Phillips-3, 2014).
A multimedia poster was produced to display the project and the outcomes. The poster
was designed to advertise the artefact for the H818 conference in February 2015.
(Purrington, 2014) indicates that the poster needed to be concise and clear, without
cluttering words and sentences. The accessibility of the poster also needs to be

considered, please see TMA02 – Part 1 for more information on the accessibility
features of the poster (Phillips, 2015).
The original draft of the poster was constructed using www.linoit.com, (Phillips-6,
2014), this draft was shared with the H818 cohort and the following feedback was
received:
 “…I have clicked to view your poster but when I try and click into any of the
icons I get re-directed to a lino web page which tells me I must sign up to view.”
(Greenwood, 2014).
 “I had the same. It wants me to log in in order to view. Sam” (Marks, 2014)
Due to the peer feedback it was decided that www.linoit.com did not meet the
requirements of this task. The page needs to be easily accessed by all (JISC, n.d.), to
ensure accessibility and ease of use.
Other H818 students produced posters, which in turn were reviewed. The review of
the H818 student’s posters helped to give a clear understanding of what was required
for the poster, for example, (Seaward, 2014) produced a very clear and visually
attractive poster, (Marks, 2014) produced a clear video with pictorial representations
of the points raised and (Walker, 2014) who produced a colourful Prezi.
Using PowToon, an animation website, a clip was produced (Phillips-7, 2014). The
following feedback was received from a H818 student:
 “…Obviously, creating your own content helps with understanding and revision,
but do you think that the fun of creating webpages could overtake the learning
aspect? So, they might spend all their time making a cool-looking resource, and
not enough time on the actual content” (Kidger, 2014)
After this feedback was received, it was decided that there was not enough
information on the animated clip to answer this point, therefore the clip needed to be
embedded into a more detailed description of the artefact.
(Potter, 2013) describes how Prezi can be used for academic purposes, which has led to
the second version of the TMA02 poster. The techniques described by Potter (2013)
have influenced the Prezi poster produced for the artefact. An example of the
techniques include:
 Prezi is non-linear and enables you to move around the screen to relevant
elements.
 Prezi enables you to embed different types of media, such as video clips and
audio files.
A Prezi poster was produced and shared on with the H818 students (Phillips-8, 2014).
The following feedback was received:

 “…You've given a clear title, remember also to include your name and affiliation,
and conference theme… Tell us what kind of artefact you will be presenting at
conference… The first slide starts with some assumptions about revision not
being taught well. Do you mean in your school? in maths? Do you have any
evidence to support this rather sweeping statement? I'm sure technology is
never the solution! Isn't learning activity the solution? Technology just enables
us to be able to design different types of learning activities? If you are going to
name sources, you need to cite them fully. Can you explain where the data
behind the pie charts comes from? I hope that's helpful feedback. Rhona”
(Sharpe, 2014)
 “…As Rhona says, could technology based solutions help might be better than
technology as the solution. Technology can afford a different approach to the
revision. For me the headlines about the research worked. They told me what
had been carried out clearly. I also really like that you are linking to a website
externally, which looks great.” (Marks-2, 2015)
 “… I do think your could remove some of the findings and share those with us at
the conference. Only because it might help unclutter some of the stages to allow
us to marvel at the beauty of it! It is definitely CLEAR but I would stick in
somewhere the words 'THEME: Implementation' if nothing more than to tick
the box!” (Mulligan, 2014)
Using the feedback from the H818 students, the poster was amended and version 2
(Phillips-9, 2014), was shared using Open Studios. Feedback included:
 “… the music did not bother me. Would it be possible to cut some slides? I found
that the slide with "project brief" would maybe not have to be repeated as
often...or maybe it was because of the audio recording? Would it be possible to
have an extra click for those who wish to view/hear the accessible version?”
(MasseDuBois, 2014)
 “…I actually did find the music a little problematic because at times it was
easier to hear the music than you (especially during the YouTube clip). Maybe
you could adjust the volume a bit” (Anderson, 2014)
This feedback led to the background music being deleted from the Prezi and also slides
being removed. The final Prezi Version 3 (Phillips-10, 2014) was produced taking into
account all the feedback received.
All versions of the poster, including the accessible PDF, the video and accessibility
statement have been shared as open content using a variety of methods, including
Twitter, SlideShare, the artefact website (Phillips-5, 2014) and Angela Phillips’s Blog
(Phillips-11, 2014).

SUMMARY
In summary the project will now be reviewed and analysed including looking at the
impact of the learning activity. The results will be presented at the H818 conference
in February 2015.
The project has enabled development as a networked practitioner and the feedback of
the students and tutors involved in H818 has been extremely constructive and
insightful.
The case study will be published as an open resource (Phillips-5, 2014), where the
resources and outcomes will be available for all. This project will continue to be
monitored to see if the long term outcomes are achieved.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The following would be acknowledged for the support and feedback given; Michelle
Payne, Sharon Kennare, Seaward, Marks, Walker, Kidger, Sharpe, Mulligan,
MasseDuBois, Anderson, Alice DE Rooy and Oliver Sterland.
Word Count:2056
REFERENCES
Anderson, J., 2014. Open Studios. [Online]
Available at: http://students.open.ac.uk/iet/h81x/h818-
14j/showphoto.php?photoid=167496&action=mydesignwork&week=2&currentuser=ap994
8
[Accessed 6 January 2015].
Australian Government Department of Education, n.d. Teaching Teachers for the
Future. [Online]
Available at: http://www.ttf.edu.au/what-is-tpack/what-is-tpack.html
Cohen, D., 2013. BBC News. [Online]
Available at: http://www.bbc.com/news/health-22565912
Dunlosky, J. K. A. B. E. J. M. M. J. N. D. T. W., 2013. Improving Students' Learning
With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Direction From Cognitive and
Educational Psychology. [Online]
Available at:
http://psi.sagepub.com/content/14/1/4.full.pdf+html?ijkey=Z10jaVH/60XQM&keytype
=ref&siteid=sppsi

Durlak, J. A., 2011. The importance of implementation for research, practice, and
policy. [Online]
Available at: http://www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/2011-
34DurlakImportanceofImplementation.pdf
Greenwood, S., 2014. Open Studio - TMA02 Poster. [Online]
948
JISC, n.d. Users who have difficulty with vision. [Online]
Available at: http://www.jisctechdis.ac.uk/techdis/userneeds/vision
Kidger, L., 2014. Open Studios - a fun introduction to my project. [Online]
948
Marks-2, S., 2015. Open Studios - Poster version 2. [Online]
14j/showphoto.php?photoid=167217&action=none&week=999&currentuser=ap9948
Marks, S., 2014. Open Studio. [Online]
14j/showphoto.php?photoid=167070&action=mydesignwork&week=1&currentuser=sm29
642
Marks, S., 2014. Open Studio - TMA02 Poster. [Online]
948
MasseDuBois, V., 2014. Open Studio. [Online]
8

Miller, H., 2014. Revolutionise your homework with student blogs. [Online]
Available at: http://acec2014.acce.edu.au/session/revolutionise-your-homework-
student-blogs
Minnesota Department of Education, n.d. Stages of Implementation. [Online]
Available at:
https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact
=8&sqi=2&ved=0CCkQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.effectiveservices.org%2Fimages
%2Fuploads%2FNIRN-Education-
StagesOfImplementationAnalysisWhereAreWe.pdf&ei=_txhVMKCNcTvmAWGz4LIDw
&usg
Mulligan, M., 2014. Open Studios - Poster number 2. [Online]
Orlando, J., 2010. Blogging to Improve Student Learning: Tips and Tools for Getting
Started. [Online]
Available at: http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/effective-teaching-
strategies/blogging-to-improve-student-learning-tips-and-tools-for-getting-started/
Phillips-10, A., 2014. H818 TMA02 Multimedia Poster Version 3. [Online]
Available at: https://prezi.com/eaziolllsbdg/h818-tma02-multimedia-poster-version-3/
Phillips-11, A., 2014. Angela Phillips. [Online]
Available at: http://angphil.blogspot.com.au/2012/09/finishing-h800-and-starting-
h810.html
Phillips-1, A., 2014. Creating a revision webpage for Mathematics. [Online]
Available at: http://www.slideshare.net/angphil/task-for-students
Phillips-2, A., 2014. I <3 Maths. [Online]
Available at:
http://linoit.com/users/angphil/canvases/Year%208%20Revision%20Web%20Pages%2
02014
Phillips-3, A., 2014. Year 8 Revision Website - My feedback. [Online]
Available at:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1pghdAqH6ZKEFNTFVp_KuTRPozWNjvJ_aI12gzZ7l
waA/viewform?usp=send_form
Phillips-4, A., 2014. Google Form Questionnaire - Peer review. [Online]
Available at:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1DlgnlEr4YfHcHBjjAYDdJGE1RZeC5ndEiZWmF1euu
vg/viewform?usp=send_form
Phillips-5, A., 2014. The Project: The use of student generated webpages to improve
revision and ongoing Mathematical development. [Online]
Available at: http://h818.weebly.com/
Phillips-6, A., 2014. Welcome to my H818 Poster for TMA02 - Please feel free to
comment ;). [Online]
Available at: http://linoit.com/users/angphil/canvases/Angela%20Phillips%20-
%20H818%20Poster%20
Phillips-7, A., 2014. YouTube H818 - Angela Phillips - 2014 - TMA02. [Online]
Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuSCcC0esY4
Phillips-8, A., 2014. H818 TMA02 Multimedia Poster. [Online]
Available at: https://prezi.com/vwnfzlxl3xev/httpyoutubemusccc0esy4/
Phillips-9, A., 2014. H818 TMA02 Multimedia Poster - VERSION 2. [Online]
Available at: https://prezi.com/qhf5cpwg3wkf/h818-tma02-multimedia-poster-version-
2/
Phillips, A., 2015. H818 TMA 02 Part 1. [Online]
Available at: http://www.slideshare.net/angphil/h818-tma-02-part-1
Pinantoan, A., 2012. informED. [Online]
Available at: http://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/features/educational-
psychology-20-things-educators-need-to-know-about-how-students-learn/
Potter, N., 2013. The Impact Blog. [Online]
Available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/06/07/prezi-in-the-
academic-environment/

Purrington, C., 2014. Designing confrence posters. [Online]
Available at: http://colinpurrington.com/tips/academic/posterdesign
Seaward, P., 2014. Open Studio - Draft Poster v2. What do Distance MA Education
Students Learn in Social Media?. [Online]
14j/showphoto.php?photoid=167104&action=mydesignwork&week=1&currentuser=ps752
2
Sharpe, R., 2014. Open Studio - Draft Poster number 2. [Online]
Slater, S., 2012. Five Best Ways To Revise for Exams, by an Oxbridge Applications
Consultant. [Online]
Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sarah-slater/exams-best-ways-to-revise-
oxbridge_b_1518247.html?ref=uk-universities-education
TPACK, M. K. &., n.d. TPACK Org. [Online]
Available at: http://tpack.org/
UNSW Australia, 2013. What is a Case Study. [Online]
Available at: https://student.unsw.edu.au/what-case-study
Walker, A., 2014. Open Studio - Firt (very) draft poster. [Online]
14j/showphoto.php?photoid=167227&action=mydesignwork&week=1&currentuser=aw357

Tma02 part 2 extended

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (18)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (6)

Similar to Tma02 part 2 extended

Similar to Tma02 part 2 extended (20)

More from Angela Phillips

More from Angela Phillips (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Tma02 part 2 extended