Faculty Peer To Peer Mentoring Presentation
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Faculty Peer To Peer Mentoring Presentation

on

  • 4,110 views

Faculty Peer-to-Peer Mentoring Pilot Program Presentation at Sloan-C International Symposium in May 2008

Faculty Peer-to-Peer Mentoring Pilot Program Presentation at Sloan-C International Symposium in May 2008

Statistics

Views

Total Views
4,110
Views on SlideShare
4,091
Embed Views
19

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
85
Comments
1

2 Embeds 19

http://www.slideshare.net 18
http://196.214.85.50 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
  • The list of critical success factors are important to take into consideration when you begin faculty peer mentoring. I believe that mutual learning should be one of the top priorities.

    Reed Markham
    Speech Department
    Daytona State College
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Faculty Peer To Peer Mentoring Presentation Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Infusing E merging T echnology into the Curriculum: Faculty Peer-to-Peer Mentoring
  • 2. Infusing E merging T echnology into the Curriculum: Faculty Peer-to-Peer Mentoring Dr. Jerold Miller , Director of Teacher Education and Professor, Graduate School of Education Dr. Andrew Shean , Learning Technology Consultant & Adjunct Professor Aung Zayar Lwin , Associate Director of Learning Technology, Teaching and Learning Institute
  • 3. Alliant International University San Diego Campus San Francisco Campus Los Angeles Campus Mexico City Campus
  • 4. A genda
    • Project Genesis - development of idea
    • Implementation Process - collaboration and design
    • Critical Success Factors - relationships
    • Survey Results - effect on learning and engagement
  • 5. P ilot V ision
    • Designed to support the integration of emerging technologies with online courses.
    • *Sponsored by the Teaching and Learning Institute
  • 6. B u dget
  • 7. T imeline 2007 - 2008 Pilot Project Final Report & Recommendations Program Evaluation survey Technology Implementation in Courses Matching Technologies with Courses & Content Technology Demonstrations (Mentor) Identify Volunteer Faculty Identify & Evaluate Emerging Technologies Mentor Team Appointed May April Mar Feb Jan Dec Nov Oct Sept Task
  • 8. Collaboratio n
    • Meetings
    • Teach, Model, Best Practices
    • Support and Consult
    • Survey
  • 9. Tools o ut there…
    • Wikis: A wiki is software that allows users to easily create, edit, and link web pages. Wikis are often used to create collaborative websites.
    • WebQuests are learning environments where students read, analyze, and synthesize information using the Internet. Although WebQuests are not new, they may include other current technologies such as Podcasts, YouTube video, and links to current websites.
    • Social Bookmarking is a way for Internet users to store, organize, share, and search bookmarks of web pages. Social bookmarking connects many contemporary and emerging technologies.
    • Content Area Software or Applications may be appropriate for use in some courses. Examples include simulation software, statistical packages, or database/spreadsheet software.
  • 10. F aculty M entoring
    • Mentee Selection
    • Intrinsic Motivation
    • Risk Takers
    • What Mentees Want!
    • Babs
  • 11. C ritical S uccess F actors
    • Cultivate relationships
    • Mutual learning
    • Leadership!
    • Open mindset, consistent communication
    • Not busy work, meaningful and efficient
  • 12. S urvey R esults
    • Technology resulted in students communicating with other students and faculty seamlessly and more often.
    • The wiki allowed them to integrate their ideas and, interestingly, facilitated their self perception as a real team working on a group project. I think the wiki is the tool that helps generate the team spirit that faculty yearn when assigning team projects. The students added, deleted and integrated as an authentic team should.... When used (the wiki) on individual projects, the quality of the output was consistently better than when they submit in-class assignment (do not understand the dynamics here)
    • Use of PowerPoint, video; team presentations in which they used clips from YouTube. Specifically, teams of 3 students worked on presentations and were able to be as creative as they chose to be-- incorporating video, film clips, PowerPoint. Students were more in touch with me.
    • I really enjoyed watching the integrating process in their group projects. I also like reviewing their process of improving their individual work by looking at the "recent changes" capability on the wiki. The review of the "discussions" was also interesting.
    • A couple of students used their computers to disengage in class discussion.
  • 13. Q u estions http://www.alliant.wikispaces.net