Publication strategy for LEI
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Publication strategy for LEI

on

  • 1,462 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,462
Views on SlideShare
1,459
Embed Views
3

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
14
Comments
0

1 Embed 3

http://wowter.wordpress.com 3

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10
  • 12/10/10

Publication strategy for LEI Publication strategy for LEI Presentation Transcript

  • Publishing for impact Wouter Gerritsma Wageningen UR Library
  • Contents
    • Introduction
    • Citation analysis
    • Journal Impact
    • Publication strategy
  • My article has been cited 22 times! But was does it mean? Image: www.rcac.net.au
  • How do we compare numbers?
    • Scientist Z. Math has a publication from 1999 with 17 citations
    • Scientist M. Biology has a publication from 2006 with 24 citations
  • Baselines for Mathematics
  • Baseline Molecular Biology
  • Bibliometric indicators: An example
    • Frewer, L.J.; Hunt, S.; Brennan, M.; Kuznesof, S.; Ness, M.; Ritson, C. (2003) The views of scientific experts on how the public conceptualize uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research 6 (1):75 - 85.
      • Times cited: 57 times
    • Journal of Risk Research (from journals menu ESI)
      • Social Science, General
    • Baseline data (from ESI)
      • Article from 2003 in Social Science, general: Average: 7.04 citations, 10%: 18 citations, 1%: 56 citations
    • RI= 57 / 7.04 = 8.1
  • Advanced bibliometric indicators
    • Follow van Raan (1996) as closely as possible; but.....
    • Web of Science is used for citation data
      • We can’t make corrections for self citations
    • Essential Science Indicators for baseline data (World average, Top 10% and Top 1%)
      • Limited number of research fields (22)
      • Same baseline data used for selected document types
        • (articles, reviews, notes and letters (and selected proceedings))
    • We can determine the representativeness of the citation analysis
  • Data aggregation in Wageningen Yield “ Crown Indicator” like “ MNCS” like
  • LEI SEP table
  • LEI SEP table 2002-2008 Pub year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Peer rev. Articles 19 30 15 17 31 40 55 207 Covered by WoS 13 16 8 13 16 24 32 125 % 68% 53% 53% 76% 52% 60% 58% 60%
  • LEI impact by category Category Pubs Cits Wavg CPP CI RI # Top 10% # Top 1% Agricultural Sciences 27 170 148 6.30 1.15 1.81 4 2 Biology & Biochemistry 2 9 32 4.50 0.29 0.82 0 0 Computer Science 3 4 10 1.33 0.41 0.64 0 0 Economics & Business 35 185 166 5.29 1.12 1.34 4 0 Engineering 1 7 4 7.00 1.77 1.77 0 0 Environment/Ecology 16 159 198 9.94 0.80 0.87 2 0 Geosciences 1 3 3 3.00 0.99 0.99 0 0 Immunology 1 11 29 11.00 0.38 0.38 0 0 Neuroscience & Behavior 1 10 19 10.00 0.52 0.52 0 0 Plant & Animal Science 13 99 88 7.62 1.12 1.19 1 0 Psychiatry/Psychology 1 8 6 8.00 1.34 1.34 0 0 Social Sciences, general 22 185 90 8.41 2.05 2.82 7 2 Aggregate 123 850 792 6.91 1.07 1.59 18 4
  • LEI impact by year Year Pubs Citations Wavg CPP CI RI # Top 10% # Top 1% 2002 13 144 179 11.08 0.81 0.83 0 0 2003 16 138 172 8.63 0.80 0.92 1 0 2004 8 57 79 7.13 0.72 0.76 0 0 2005 12 108 102 9.00 1.06 1.24 1 0 2006 15 72 102 4.80 0.71 0.69 1 0 2007 24 146 89 6.08 1.63 1.74 5 0 2008 35 185 69 5.29 2.68 2.77 10 4 Aggregate 123 850 792 6.91 1.07 1.59 18 4
  • Journal selection and article impact
  • JIF and article impact   # Articles RI st.dev. Quartile 1 45 2.33 3.16 Quartile 2 27 1.56 1.61 Quartile 3 34 0.79 0.63 Quartile 4 10 1.95 4.61 Average 116 1.67 2.61
  • Quartile 1 journals Journal Category JIF TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Agricultural Sciences 2.534 JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE Agricultural Sciences 2.486 CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION Agricultural Sciences 1.947 AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS Agricultural Sciences 1.708 ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS Economics & Business 1.912 JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS Economics & Business 1.403 FOOD POLICY Economics & Business 1.351 EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS Economics & Business 1.271 JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS Economics & Business 1.271 ECONOMIC POLICY Economics & Business 1.231 AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT Environment/Ecology 1.832 ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT Geosciences 2.890 VACCINE Immunology 3.007 PHYTOPATHOLOGY Plant & Animal Science 2.377 THERIOGENOLOGY Plant & Animal Science 2.161 JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH Plant & Animal Science 2.065 VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY Plant & Animal Science 2.010 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES Plant & Animal Science 1.965 ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE Plant & Animal Science 1.661 JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR Psychiatry/Psychology 1.981 LAND USE POLICY Social Sciences, general 1.821 RISK ANALYSIS Social Sciences, general 1.784 JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS Social Sciences, general 0.833
  • Journal selection and impact of Dutch Univ. NOWT (2008). Wetenschaps- en Technologie- Indicatoren 2008 . Maastricht, Nederlands Observatorium van Wetenschap en Technologie (NOWT).
  • Other journal quality information
    • Essential Science Indicators (WoK platform)
    • ScimagoJR (based on Scopus)
    • Journalmetrics.com (based on Scopus)
  • Final word on Journal quality It is better to publish one paper in a quality journal than multiple papers in lesser journals. [...]. Try to publish in journals that have high impact factors; chances are your paper will have high impact, too, if accepted. Bourne, P. E. (2005). Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published. PLoS Comput Biol 1(5): e57 .
  • Networks
  • Internal cooperation NOWT (2008). Wetenschaps- en Technologie- Indicatoren 2008 . Maastricht, Nederlands Observatorium van Wetenschap en Technologie (NOWT).
  • Cooperation is rewarding NOWT (2010). Wetenschaps- en Technologie- Indicatoren 2010 . Maastricht, Nederlands Observatorium van Wetenschap en Technologie (NOWT).
  • Cooperation... Wuchty, S., B. F. Jones , et al. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827): 1036-1039. Teams increasingly dominate solo authors in the production of knowledge. Research is increasingly done in teams across nearly all fields. Teams typically produce more frequently cited research than individuals do, and this advantage has been increasing over time. Teams now also produce the exceptionally high-impact research, even where that distinction was once the domain of solo authors.
  • Self citations
  • Self citations The model [...] implies that external citations are enhanced by self-citations, so that we have the “chain reaction:” Larger size leads to more self-citations, which lead to more external citations. 11/28 van Raan, A. F. J. (2008). Self-citation as an impact-reinforcing mechanism in the science system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(10): 1631-1643.
  • More on references Articles that cite more references are in turn cited more themselves Webster, G. D., P. K. Jonason , et al. (2009). Hot Topics and Popular Papers in Evolutionary Psychology: Analyses of Title Words and Citation Counts in Evolution and Human Behavior, 1979 – 2008. Evolutionary Psychology 7(3): 348-362 . Citing across disciplines, risky but rewarding Shi, X., J. Leskovec , et al. (2010). Citing for high impact. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries . p.49-58
  • Increased impact? Advertise yourself
    • Self-citations
    • Write review articles
    • Generalize your research findings
    • Submit prepints/postprints to digital Open Archives (Metis)
    • Use professional social networking tools
    • Include publications on personal webpages
    • Make use of ResearchID and ScopusID to highlight your publication list
    • Write or expand articles in the Wikipedia and refer to your publications
    • Blog/tweet about your research
  • Downloads from wikipedia
  • Is LEI a strong brand?
  • Affiliations in publications 2002-2010 LEI 52 82 56 Agr. Ec. Res. Inst. In total 198 publications (6 as Agr. Ec. Inst. and 2 as Landbouw Ec. Inst.)
  • Most common address used for LEI
  • Without Wageningen University & Research
  • WUR-LEI
  • In Dutch?
  • Wageningen UR
  • LEI in Leystad another LEI?
  • Thank you! http://wowter.net http://www.slideshare.net/wowter