Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Bibliometric analysis for the  peer review 2009 Wouter Gerritsma & Marianne Renkema Information specialists, Wageningen UR...
Contents <ul><li>Peer review 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>Role of the library </li></ul><ul><li>Bibliometric indicators </li></u...
Peer review of graduate schools in 2009 <ul><li>PE&RC, WIAS, EPS, VLAG, Ceres, Mansholt will be externally peer reviewed i...
What role does the library play? <ul><li>Productivity of a group is extracted from METIS/WaY </li></ul><ul><li>Quality of ...
Bibliometric indicators
I have been cited 33 times! But what does it mean? <ul><li>Citation data from  Web of Science </li></ul><ul><li>Research F...
How do we compare numbers? <ul><li>Scientist  Z. Math  has a publication from 1996 with 17 citations </li></ul><ul><li>Sci...
Baseline mathematics
Baseline Molecular Biology
Example <ul><li>Claassen PAM, van Lier JB, Contreras AML, van Niel EWJ, Sijtsma L, Stams AJM, de Vries SS, Weusthuis RA(19...
Other bibliometric indicators <ul><li>Number or percentage of highly cited articles </li></ul><ul><li>Number or percentage...
h-index
Some results from candidates for professorship 9 4 1.34 11.23 348 31 Candidate F 8 11 4.92 8.70 235 27 Candidate E 8 1 0.8...
Some results for SENSE 68 9 215 60 19 474 1.69 1.56 22405.23 35002 2457 SENSE                         60 8 105 35 18 254 1...
Strengths Weaknesses 1.51(384) 0.98(338) Total 0.75(11) 1.66(1) Plant & Animal Science 0.88(12)   Molecular Biology & Gene...
Planning
Planning  <ul><li>Sep. ’08 Searching WoS on basis of address fields, matching with Metis </li></ul><ul><li>Oct. ’08 Checki...
Thank you ! More info:  http://wowter.net This presentation  http:// www.slideshare.net/Wowter/citation+analysis   vlag /
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

citation analysis vlag

2,488 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business

citation analysis vlag

  1. 1. Bibliometric analysis for the peer review 2009 Wouter Gerritsma & Marianne Renkema Information specialists, Wageningen UR Library
  2. 2. Contents <ul><li>Peer review 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>Role of the library </li></ul><ul><li>Bibliometric indicators </li></ul><ul><li>Planning </li></ul>
  3. 3. Peer review of graduate schools in 2009 <ul><li>PE&RC, WIAS, EPS, VLAG, Ceres, Mansholt will be externally peer reviewed in 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>3000 researchers published 9000 peer reviewed articles in the period 2002-2007 </li></ul><ul><li>Criteria by QANU http:// www.qanu.nl / comasy / uploadedfiles /sep2003-2009.pdf </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Quality </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Productivity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Relevance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Vitality </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. What role does the library play? <ul><li>Productivity of a group is extracted from METIS/WaY </li></ul><ul><li>Quality of a group based can be based on bibliometric indicators </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Bibliometric analysis is not stipulated in the SEP ! </li></ul></ul>
  5. 5. Bibliometric indicators
  6. 6. I have been cited 33 times! But what does it mean? <ul><li>Citation data from Web of Science </li></ul><ul><li>Research Fields from Essential Science Indicators </li></ul><ul><li>Baseline data from Essential Science Indicators </li></ul>
  7. 7. How do we compare numbers? <ul><li>Scientist Z. Math has a publication from 1996 with 17 citations </li></ul><ul><li>Scientist M. Biology has a publication from 2003 with 24 citations </li></ul>
  8. 8. Baseline mathematics
  9. 9. Baseline Molecular Biology
  10. 10. Example <ul><li>Claassen PAM, van Lier JB, Contreras AML, van Niel EWJ, Sijtsma L, Stams AJM, de Vries SS, Weusthuis RA(1999) Utilisation of biomass for the supply of energy carriers . APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY , 52 (6): 741-755. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Time cited: 56 times </li></ul></ul><ul><li>APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY (look up in journals menu ESI) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>microbiology , ranked 13 th, 8.9 citations per article over past 10 years </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Baseline data (from ESI) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Article from 1999 in microbiology: Average: 24.38 citations, 10%: 56 citations, 1%: 162 citations </li></ul></ul><ul><li>RI= 56 / 24.38 = 2.3 </li></ul>
  11. 11. Other bibliometric indicators <ul><li>Number or percentage of highly cited articles </li></ul><ul><li>Number or percentage of uncited articles </li></ul><ul><li>H-index (g-index etc …) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Balancing productivity and citedness </li></ul></ul>
  12. 12. h-index
  13. 13. Some results from candidates for professorship 9 4 1.34 11.23 348 31 Candidate F 8 11 4.92 8.70 235 27 Candidate E 8 1 0.83 7.21 137 19 Candidate D 4 0 0.65 7.69 123 16 Candidate C 9 8 2.61 10.61 191 18 Candidate B 8 3 1.23 8.19 172 21 Candidate A h-index Pubs top 10% RI Cits/Pub S cits Pubs Researcher
  14. 14. Some results for SENSE 68 9 215 60 19 474 1.69 1.56 22405.23 35002 2457 SENSE                         60 8 105 35 18 254 1.67 1.59 14418.67 22872 1400 WIMEK 31 14 39 10 25 72 1.95 2.01 1763.53 3537 284 IVM 22 14 41 6 20 57 1.55 1.30 1906.09 2470 292 Copernicus 29 5 14 8 19 55 1.81 1.57 2525.22 3965 292 IES h-index As % of total pubs Uncited Pubs Pubs top 1% As % of total Pubs Pubs top 10% RI S Cits/ S Wavg S Wavg S cits Pubs Institute
  15. 15. Strengths Weaknesses 1.51(384) 0.98(338) Total 0.75(11) 1.66(1) Plant & Animal Science 0.88(12)   Molecular Biology & Genetics 1.54(203) 1.05(29) Microbiology 2.30(45) 1.13(181) Environment/Ecology 3.35(1) 5.70(2) Engineering 0.36(8) 0.98(17) Chemistry 1.05(92) 0.59(100) Biology & Biochemistry 3.54(12) 0.94(6) Agricultural Sciences Group 2 Group 1  
  16. 16. Planning
  17. 17. Planning <ul><li>Sep. ’08 Searching WoS on basis of address fields, matching with Metis </li></ul><ul><li>Oct. ’08 Checking unmatched articles from Metis in WoS </li></ul><ul><li>Nov. ’08 Publication of personal reference lists with citation data in Way </li></ul><ul><li>Nov.-Dec. ’08 Checking publication lists by authors, feedback to contacts at chair groups </li></ul><ul><li>Feb. ’09 Update of citation data </li></ul><ul><li>Mar. ’09 Drafting reports in preparation for peer review </li></ul>
  18. 18. Thank you ! More info: http://wowter.net This presentation http:// www.slideshare.net/Wowter/citation+analysis vlag /

×