Study UK is the leading association for independent higher education providers, with 125+ members across the UK. Our annual conference covers all the current major issues in the education industry, bringing you up to date with the latest research, policy changes and practical advice. This year’s conference had a political focus, as we forecast what the range of potential outcomes from the 2015 election might entail for the education sector, and what new regulations might be introduced.Our keynote speakers were Shadow Immigration Minister Rt Hon David Hanson MP, HEFCE Chief Executive Professor Madeleine Atkins CBE and President of Pearson UK Rod Bristow.
2. Education 2020 – the choices ahead
Rt Hon David Hanson MP,
Shadow Minister for Immigration
3. Education 2020 – the choices ahead
Dr Emran Mian,
Social Market Foundation
Jonathan Simons,
Policy Exchange
Andrew Harrop,
Fabian Society
CHAIR: Tony Millns,
Former Chief Executive, English
UK
Rt Hon David Hanson MP,
Shadow Minister for Immigration
Professor Stephen Lee,
CentreForum
4. UK Trends and Developments
25/11/2014 4
Margaret Farragher
Head of Policy and Qualifications
m.farragher@ucas.ac.uk
5. “This session will look at trends
emerging from UCAS’ analysis of
the UK applications cycle. It will
also explore the impact of UK wide
qualification reforms on the future
of admissions”
25/11/2014 5
Introduction
1. Trends in UK admissions –
analysis of the UCAS 2013/14
application cycle and early
insight into the 2014/15 cycle
2. Potential impact of
qualification reforms on the
higher education (HE) sector
8. Application rates
increase to new
highs; English 18
year olds 4%
more likely to
apply to HE than
25/11/2014 8
1.1. Application rates for 18 year olds in the UK
Application rates
increase to new
highs; English 18
year olds 4%
more likely to
apply to HE than
in 2013
in 2013
9. 1.2. Application rates for English 18 year olds from the most
disadvantaged areas (POLAR2 quintile 1) by sex
Young women
more likely to
apply than young
men, especially in
disadvantaged
Young women
more likely to
apply than young
men, especially in
disadvantaged
areas
areas
25/11/2014 9
10. 1.3. Number of English 18 year old applicants predicted and
attaining A level grades at ABB+
A continuing reduction of attainment
against predicted grades led to a fall of
4% in applicants achieving grades of
ABB or higher in 2014 compared to
2013
A continuing reduction of attainment
against predicted grades led to a fall of
4% in applicants achieving grades of
ABB or higher in 2014 compared to
2013
25/11/2014 10
11. 1.4. Acceptances according to domicile: difference between
cycle and 2013 cycle
Acceptances by
Acceptances by
domicile
domicile
reached record
levels for all
residencies
apart from
reached record
levels for all
residencies
apart from
Scotland
Scotland
25/11/2014 11
12. 1.5. Acceptances according to route: difference between cycle
and 2013 cycle
Highest percentage
increase in those
placed through their
insurance choice and
Clearing; firm accepts
reach record level
Highest percentage
increase in those
placed through their
insurance choice and
Clearing; firm accepts
reach record level
25/11/2014 12
13. Medium and
higher tariff
institutions
increased their
recruitment to
the highest ever
totals
25/11/2014 13
1.6. Acceptances according to Tariff group: difference
between cycle and 2013 cycle
Medium and
higher tariff
institutions
increased their
recruitment to
the highest ever
totals
14. 1.7. ABB+ acceptances according to qualification on entry
The number
The number
of
of
acceptances
who are ABB+
through BTECs
continues to
acceptances
who are ABB+
through BTECs
continues to
increase
increase
25/11/2014 14
15. 1.8. Application rates for courses with 15 October deadline:
difference between cycle and 2014 cycle
A small but
real decline
(-3%) in
demand for
A small but
real decline
(-3%) in
demand for
these
courses
these
courses
25/11/2014 15
17. 2. UK wide qualification reforms
New Nationals
- Scotland
VQ reform
- England
25/11/2014 17
New core maths -
England
New A levels
- England,
Wales, NI
New Highers
- Scotland
Decoupled AS
- England
New GCSEs -
England
Coupled AS -
Wales and NI
New Welsh
Bacc - Wales
Increased use of VQs
Science practical
grades - England
18. How is UCAS supporting learners, schools/ colleges and
HEPs?
• Building changes into the admissions
service
• Data and analysis
• Information and advice for students,
parents, teachers and advisers
• Conferences and events
• Qualification Information Profiles &
Guides
• New UCAS Tariff
• www.UCAS.com
25/11/2014 18
20. Data and Student Choice
Alison Berry, Head of Institutional Liaison
21. HESA Data Collections
Aggregate
Offshore
Count of students
studying wholly
overseas for UK HE
qualifications
Student
Information
about
students,
courses and
qualifications
at HEPs
Destinations
Survey of
graduate
activities six
months after
leaving HE
Destinations
Survey of
graduate
activities six
months after
leaving HE
Staff
Staff
Information
about staff
employed by
Information
about staff
employed by
HEIs
HEIs
Institution
Profile
Information about
HEI campuses and
departments
Estates
Estates
Management
Buildings, estates
and environmental
information about
Management
Buildings, estates
and environmental
information about
HEIs
HEIs
Finance
Income and
expenditure of
Finance
Income and
expenditure of
HEIs
HEIs
AP Student
Record
Information
about
students,
courses and
qualifications
at designated
HEPs
Key Information
Key Information
Set
Set
Data about
undergraduate
courses, published
Data about
undergraduate
courses, published
on Unistats
on Unistats
Institution
Profile
Information about
HEI campuses and
departments
AP Student
Record
Information
about
students,
courses and
qualifications
at designated
HEPs
HE Business and
Community
Interaction
Interactions
between HEIs and
business and the
wider community
HE Business and
Community
Interaction
Interactions
between HEIs and
business and the
wider community
Student
Information
about
students,
courses and
qualifications
at HEPs
Longitudina
l DLHE
Sample survey
of leavers 3.5
years after
graduation
Longitudina
l DLHE
Sample survey
of leavers 3.5
years after
graduation
Aggregate
Offshore
Count of students
studying wholly
overseas for UK HE
qualifications
22.
23. Why is it important: Public information
• Public information agenda:
• League tables
- Entry qualifications
- Degree classifications
- Student:Staff ratios
- Expenditure
• Unistats
- Comprised of student, KIS & DLHE
• Research
• Performance indicators
29. How does HESA provide access to data?
HESA bespoke data service
30.
31. Data collection and submission
The Institutional Liaison team are there to help with all
aspects of the return from local collection of data items
through to final submission.
Contact the team
liaison@hesa.ac.uk
01242 211144
34. Our Tale Begins...
Degree Awarding Powers, University Title, Highly Trusted
Status
Not for profit and cheaper
Best Higher Education Provider of the Year 201/143 & Best
Professional Education Provider of the Year 2013/14
7 UK locations, 3 starts a year, full-time, accelerated, part-time,
evening, weekends
We educate professionals in over 80% of the FTSE100
companies, 1/3 of entrants into the legal profession and 2/3 of
qualified accountants
Top Five Law School, 38 exclusive Law firms, 4 magic circle
firms, most Bar pupillages
Business School exclusive degree provision with employers
School of Health with Dentistry, Nursing, Chiropractic;
School of Foundation and English Language Studies;
Traditional, mainstream and conservative
34 TITLE HERE 00 MONTH 0000
35. The Unexpected...
Rate of Growth – 10 000 students,
largest full-time undergraduate Law
degree, 30% international students;
Flexibility;
Professionally focussed, no frills higher
education
The price of swimming in the
‘mainstream’
How we tailored our approach:
True to our core;
Not standing still;
Tougher
Fitting in
35 TITLE HERE 00 MONTH 0000
36. To Challenge the educational status quo to positively change lives
through our passion for education and the professions
IBM had some parts manufactured in Japan as a trial project.
IBM specified that they would only accept 3 defective parts per
10,000. A letter accompanied the delivery
"We, Japanese people, had a hard time understanding North
American business practices. But the three defective parts per
10,000 have been separately manufactured and have been
included in the consignment. Hope this pleases you."
36 TITLE HERE 00 MONTH 0000
37. Helen Obaje
Working with
agents:
encouraging
best practice
StudyUK
November
2014
38. Building Agent Capacity and Professionalism
• The aim of the British Council agent strategy is to increase the
number, effectiveness and quality of agents working on behalf of
UK providers in all relevant sectors.
• This is achieved primarily through British Council’s Agent Training
and Continuing Professional Development Programmes.
• These are backed up by information dissemination and other
activities aimed at developing the role of agents as marketing
partners. British Council maintains agent databases and makes
lists of trained agents available to institutions and students,
41. Levels of certification
2 years certification is gained for successful completion of each agent training
programme
Year 3, Advanced level
British Council Advanced Agents
Certificate
•agent practitioner led
•evidence of CPD activities
Year 1, Foundation level
Education UK Award for Agents,
Advisors and Education Counsellors
•8 weeks’ supported on-line learning
•Formal exam
42. Course Content
• Unit 1
• Studying and living in the UK
• Lifestyle
• Costs and finance
• Working while studying
• Visas, immigration and dependants
• Accommodation
• Agent Environment
• Unit 2
• Why choose a UK education
• How the UK education system works
• English language learning
• School and tutorial college education
• Further and work based education
• Higher education - undergraduate
study
• Higher education - postgraduate study
• Study for a UK qualification in your
own country
• Resources and support
43. Professionalism and the new BCAAC CPD programme
Drivers
A consistent, defined recertification model for all countries
Agent demand for context-specific, advanced training opportunities
Embedding professionalism and ethics in capacity-building activity
Recognising:
•maturation of the agent ‘industry’
•the diversity of agents’ roles, relationships and contexts
•the need for flexibility in recertification, acknowledging context, experience
and professionalism
•the role of all partners in agent capacity building – developing a
collaborative approach to agents’ training and professional development
through education partners
44. The CPD Cycle – working together to build capacity
Partners in capacity
building - providing
training opportunities
Providing evidence
for the portfolio
45. Compulsory Coverage of CPD areas
The CPD Portfolio evidence must show coverage all of the
following 5 compulsory areas of activity
E Education sector knowledge
L Life in the UK
V Visas and immigration
M Marketing and promotion
P Professionalism and ethics
46. Professionalism and ethical practice
We insist that any agent gaining certification through the Advanced
training programme demonstrates commitment to, and evidence of,
ethical practice
The London statement is provided in the training materials with
examples
Agents must provide evidence of how they incorporate the principles
in current practice
47. The London Statement
• Principle 1 Agents and consultants practice responsible business ethics.
• Principle 2 Agents and consultants provide current, accurate and honest information in an
ethical manner.
• Principle 3 Agents and consultants develop transparent business relationships with
students and providers through the use of written agreements.
• Principle 4 Agents and consultants protect the interests of minors.
• Principle 5 Agents and consultants provide current and up-to-date information that enables
international students to make informed choices when selecting which agent or consultant to
employ.
• Principle 6 Agents and consultants act professionally.
• Principle 7 Agents and consultants work with destination countries and providers to raise
ethical standards and best practice.
48. What agents say………
“The agent training programme is a very
useful resource for us to understand UK
education.
Its content is very rich; it includes history,
culture, geography, environment and
government of (the) United Kingdom.
Education structures, courses, subjects and
international student support are also main
parts of the certificate.
Other than that it includes agency services, ethics and responsibilities,
visa application and regulation, pre-departure duties etc…. I believe
that this course helps to control our quality in order to run our business”
51. Additional support for agents
• Code of conduct as part of sign up
• Feedback from Institutions about agents
• Newsletters offering advice and updates
• Training opportunities from local offices
• Help with information questions and advice
• Where there is a particularly difficult market with specific issues we
work with UK specialists to provide relevant information to those
agents.
52. Evaluating and developing relationships with agents
Institution-related (feedback received from agents)
•Lack of strategic planning
•Lack of systematic marketing planning
•Mismatch of products to market needs
•Inadequate resourcing/unrealistic expectations
•Inadequate agent selection criteria/process
•Failure to understand/acknowledge changing market conditions
•Inadequate internal processes for responding to enquiries and
applications
•Level of investment in:
• Promotional activities
• Developing agent relationships
54. Study UK AGM
Nov 2014
WWoorrkkiinngg WWiitthh AAggeennttss::
EEnnccoouurraaggiinngg BBeesstt
PPrraaccttiiccee
Practitioners’
Perspective
studygroup.com
55. International Study Centres
– Istituto Marangoni, Keele University, Kingston University London, Lancaster University, Leeds Beckett
University, Royal Holloway University of London, University of Huddersfield, University of Leeds,
University of Leicester, University of Lincoln, Liverpool John Moores University, The University of
Sheffield, University of Strathclyde, University of Surrey, University of Sussex
– Brighton, Cambridge, London, Oxford
– Brighton, Cambridge, Hastings, London Greenwich, London Central, Oxford
http://corporate.studygroup.com/higher-education/united-kingdom
57. Encouraging BBeesstt PPrraaccttiiccee
• New Agents
– Sign me up!
– Early monitoring (1 CAS + 1 Refusal = ?)
• Sub Agents
• The End is Nigh…
– Warnings
– The Terminator
58. Encouraging BBeesstt PPrraaccttiiccee
• Perception and stereotypes
– Data speaks louder than words
• What do others do?
– Really? Are you sure?
– Does it even matter?
• Best approach
– Stick to your guns
– Your flexible friend
59. Encouraging BBeesstt PPrraaccttiiccee
• Great expectations
• Big carrot… Even bigger stick?
• What’s in it for me?
• One Direction
Training, Advice, Support
60. AAnnyy QQuueessttiioonnss??
Ian Smith
Visa & Accreditation Compliance Manager
email: ismith@studygroup.com
Tel: 01273 339349
61. HEFCE’s role in specific course
designation, and future
engagement
Katherine Penry and Rob Stroud
Senior HE Policy Advisers
Study UK Annual Conference
25 November 2014
62. HEFCE’s role in specific course designation
• Managing the application system since June 2013 but not the decision
maker (all powers rest with BIS)
• Assessment of applications against BIS designation criteria
• Dealing with changes to existing courses
• Creation and maintenance of the Register of HE Providers:
• Undertaking annual monitoring of providers
• Working with BIS, SLC, QAA & HESA
63. Designation criteria
• Provider must satisfy the designation criteria before applying and is
responsible for ensuring application is complete
• Quality – Must have a successful and recent review with QAA, HEFCE
will confirm QAA status directly with QAA
• Course Eligibility – as set out in the Student Support Regulations
(2011), course template and validation/approval documentation
• Financial Sustainability, Governance and Management – solvency
and fitness to receive public funds
64. Future engagement with alternative providers
• There are boundaries to the role that HEFCE can play when engaging
with alternative providers.
• We are committed to a focus on successful, collegiate relationships
with providers to support our oversight of English HE provision, and
provide some mutual benefit for providers.
• Senior HE Policy Adviser in post from September 2014.
• Looking to build our knowledge of providers’ business models,
strategies, ambitions…
• Open to feedback on what providers want/need, and what that
model of engagement may look like.
65. Contacts for queries and additional information
• HEFCE course designation team: coursedesignation@hefce.ac.uk
• Information on the application process
http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/reg/desig/
Register of HE Providers
http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/reg/register/
• HEFCE Institutions Directorate contact: r.stroud@hefce.ac.uk
67. 25 November 2014
The new GCSEs and A Levels: a University
admissions perspective
Roseanna Cross, Head of Undergraduate Admissions,
University of Bristol
67
68. When are A Levels and GCSEs changing?
68
25 November 2014
Qualification Phase 1: Sept 2015 Phase 2: Sept 2016
GCSE English Language
English Literature
Maths
Art & Design
Citizenship
Computer Science
Dance
Design & Technology
Drama
Geography
History
Languages – Ancient and Modern
Music
Physical Education
Religious Studies
Sciences (Biology, Chemistry, Physics)
A Level Art and Design
Business
Computer Science
Economics
English (Language, Literature, Language
and Literature)
History
Psychology
Sciences (Biology, Chemistry, Physics)
Sociology
Dance
Design & Technology
Drama
Geography
Languages – Ancient and Modern
Maths (Maths and Further Maths)
Music
Physical Education
Religious Studies
69. What is changing?
69
25 November 2014
New GCSEs New A Levels New AS Levels
· Linear GCSEs with assessment at the end
of the two-year course in June.
· Tiering in certain subjects only, such as
Maths and Languages.
· Assessment predominantly by external
exam only.
· A new 1–9 grading system (9 = top level).
· Re-sit opportunities in November for
Maths and English Language only.
· Linear A Levels with assessment at the end
of the two-year course in June.
· Removal of January exams; June exams
(and re-sits) only.
· Coursework submitted for moderation in
June only (minimal coursework content).
· AS Level qualifications will not count
towards the final grade of an A Level.
· Stand-alone qualification
in own right.
· Remain at current
standard.
· One examination series
per year, with first
assessment in June 2016.
· Will not count towards
final grade of A Level.
· May still be co-taught with
first year of A Level for
some subjects.
70. What else is changing?
70
25 November 2014
• New Core Maths qualification
• Extended Project qualification (EPQ) expected to
remain
71. What are the implications for Universities?
71
25 November 2014
• No AS results to declare when applicants apply
• Change to practical assessment for Science: pass
or fail in addition to grade for rest of subject
• GCSE grades will be numerical
• Reliability of predicted grades?
• ‘Mixed’ economy of old and new style A Levels
72. What are the implications for Universities?
72
25 November 2014
• Change to entry requirements/ programme
content?
• Implications for contextual offers?
• Implications for modelling and projections?
• Schools need initial guidance from this year
73. Bristol’s current position
73
25 November 2014
• In general, no plans to make major changes to
entry requirements.
• Will continue to use predicted grades.
• Programmes will review the new content and
assessment specifications when available and any
adjustments to subject requirements will be made
in time for 2017 Prospectus.
74. Bristol’s current position
74
25 November 2014
• Continue to expect applicants to take three A-levels
and eight GCSEs (or equivalent
qualifications), and additional qualifications will
not confer any advantage.
• Do not expect to introduce a requirement for AS-levels
to be taken, and do not plan to use them as
part of the process to select applicants.
75. Bristol’s current position
75
25 November 2014
• Any programme requirements for GCSE
achievement will be adjusted to fit the new
grading format, using guidance from Ofqual.
• Will continue to score GCSEs as part of selection
process, as outlined in Admissions Statements.
76. Bristol’s current position
76
25 November 2014
• Do not generally expect to ask for the Core Maths
qualification.
• Requirement for pass of the practical Science
component is still being discussed.
77. Bristol’s current position
77
25 November 2014
• Do not expect to introduce further admissions
tests, other than LNAT for Law (as at present).
• Re-sit policy: only issue for Medicine and Law at
present (see Admissions Statements).
• EPQ: some programmes make two alternative
offers, one of which involves success in the
Extended Project.
78. Bristol’s current position
78
25 November 2014
• Skills, experience and qualifications needed are
outlined in our Admissions Statements.
79. Further information
79
25 November 2014
• Policy statement on new qualifications:
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/university/governance/p
olicies/admissions/14-19qualifications-changes.
html
• Admissions Statements:
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/study/undergraduate/ap
ply/admissions-statements/
80. The new GCSEs and A Levels:
a University admissions
perspective www.ed.ac.uk
applyedinburgh
81. Lessons from curriculum
reform in Scotland
Curriculum for Excellence
New qualifications
Flexible learner journeys
www.ed.ac.uk
applyedinburgh
85. How we select
Interest in, understanding
of, commitment to subject
Achievements
“The University of Edinburgh is committed to
admitting the very best students, who
demonstrate the potential to benefit from, and
contribute to, the academic experience we offer.”
The University of Edinburgh Admissions Principles
Qualifications
Relevant
experience
Grades
Context
Predictions
Personal
statement
Subjects
Reference
86. GCSEs at Edinburgh
GCSEs in entry requirements
•English
•Maths
for arts, humanities and social science
maths or a science
•No language requirement
except for language degrees
www.ed.ac.uk
applyedinburgh
87. GCSEs at Edinburgh
GCSEs in selection
•Credit may be given for good performance
•Routinely used in selection for Medicine &
Veterinary Medicine
www.ed.ac.uk
applyedinburgh
88. A Levels and AS Levels
www.ed.ac.uk
applyedinburgh
89. AS Levels
• May be used where A Level
predictions seem ambitious
E.g.
GCSE: ABBBBBBCC
AS Level: AAAA
A Level prediction: A*A*A
www.ed.ac.uk
applyedinburgh
90. A Levels
• 3+ A2s in one exam diet
• Module resits usually fine
• A Level retakes not usually
competitive
• EPQ not currently used in
selection/offer-making
www.ed.ac.uk
applyedinburgh
91. Impact of reforms?
• GCSEs:
– Minimum requirement (4?)
– Use of Grade 9
• AS Levels: no change
• Will not distinguish between old and
new A Levels
• Science practical: skills vital for
STEM
www.ed.ac.uk
applyedinburgh
92. Communication
• Formal statement published in
spring 2015
• Changes reflected in prospectus and
online from 2017 entry
• Events – teachers, students, parents
www.ed.ac.uk
applyedinburgh
94. GCSE & A-level reform
Paul Teulon
Director of Admissions
95. Curriculum reform
AND
Financial constraints
Universities waiting for schools
to decide ….
…. schools waiting for
universities to decide
96. King’s current use of GCSE
• GCSEs performance considered for the
most selective of programmes: Medicine,
Dentistry, Law, Economics, Business
Management
• Some programmes have GCSE thresholds:
Nursing 5 A*-C including English and
Mathematics
97. King’s current use of AS
• Asymmetry of information, all state
schools and colleges must provide this
currently, but not independent and
international schools.
• Fourth AS-level is required, but only for
Medicine and Dentistry. The Extended
Project Qualification (EPQ) can be
offered in its place.
• AS achievement is used in a light touch
way and is only interrogated if
predictions are two grades higher than
achievement at AS, where reference to
this disparity should be made in the
UCAS form.
98. Subject matters
King’s endorses the Russell
Group’s guide to Informed
Choices
However, it should not be over
emphasised – it does not mean
that the non-facilitating
subjects are not valuable
King’s does not operate a black list
of subjects, students should
take the subjects that provide
the very best transition on to
the programme at university
99. King’s current use of A2
• Predicted grades are very important
• The average applicant is over-predicted
by 1.5 grades across their
top three A-level subjects
• Predictions are becoming less reliable
as the top grades have become harder
to achieve in the last three years
• King’s has reacted by reducing its
entry requirements in some areas to
match the change in grade
distribution.
• Fourth A2 is not a distinct advantage
per se
100. A-level reform
•Decoupling of the AS and A2 has strong
benefits for transition to university.
Makes conditional offers truly conditional
on performance in the hardest elements
•The potential lack of ‘co-teachability’ is
of real concern to King’s, especially for
the non-traditional learner
•AS exam stepping stone
•Requires earlier selection of the final
three subjects to be taken at A-level
101. Financial Reform
•How many A-levels can schools and
colleges afford to offer?
•King’s will continue to require fourth
AS/EPQ for Medicine and Dentistry, but
if a school states in the UCAS reference
that the school is only able to offer 3 A-levels
the student will not be
disadvantaged on that measure
•King’s: students should not be
disadvantaged in any way by a curriculum
decision which is made by their school or
college
102. Financial Reform
•Might this lead to smaller fourth AS
subjects being curtailed?
•Art?
•Modern Languages?
•Philosophy?
•Further Maths?
•Curriculum Enrichment?
103. GCSE reform
• King’s will not utilise the
new Grade 9 (A**) until we
fully understand the
implications of the new
grade, especially with
respect to Widening
Participation
• King’s does not consider the
EBacc or Progress 8 as part
of its admissions process
• Concerns over new English
Language and Literature
113. Quality and opportunity – enacting
higher education reform
Nick Davy,
Association of Colleges
Will Naylor,
QAA
Chris Hale,
Universities UK
CHAIR: Paul Kirkham,
The Institute
Madeleine Atkins CBE,
HEFCE
Nick Hillman,
Higher Education Policy Institute
114. EDUCATION
SERVICES
MILLIONS OF
What do international students STUDENTS
really want?
10,000
SCHOOLS,
COLLEGES AND
UNIVERSITIES
Marie Clark
Head of Marketing and
Communications
Daniel Cunningham
Head of Client Services
115. The situation
The battle for international students
Competition for students is global
The cost of student acquisition is rising
Students have large amounts of choice
Relatively poor data on student behaviour and
prohibitively expensive data collection
115
116. Our experience
Number of unique prospects handled: 1,250,485
Number of nationalities engaged with: 230
Number of enrolments supported: 37,203
Longest pipeline (enquiry to enrolment): 87 months
Number of communications: Outbound 1,257,144,
inbound 10,562,481 (email, phone, letter, fax)
116
118. Asking international students
What is important at each stage of the journey?
How and what should you be communicating?
Segmentation components of choice
Are the segments still valid, are there new behaviours?
Social media
What should you be doing and do international students
use it?
118
119. International students
Meet average Joe
119
From China
Interested in business
Wants postgraduate
24 years old
Will use an agent
Cost sensitive
120. Joe is thinking of studying abroad
120
SSuubbjjeecctt mmaatttteerrss mmoosstt
121. Joe starts thinking of studying abroad
121
WWee aarree ccoommppeettiinngg gglloobbaallllyy
122. Joe is thinking about study abroad
122
Quality first,
expected
welcome also
important
Quality first,
expected
welcome also
important
123. How does Joe research?
123
Big screen
content still
important
Big screen
content still
important
124. HHooww does Joe research his institution?
124
Students think
they don’t need
agents. Is there
anything we can
do on this?
Students think
they don’t need
agents. Is there
anything we can
do on this?
125. Tweetable takeaways
@kiwimariec @hobsonsemea #StudyUK14
40% of #international #students say subject is their first
consideration
Country’s attitude and safety are very #important to
#international #students
Most #international #students still research on the big
screen
71% don’t think they will need an agent
125
127. Joe wants you to respond – how quickly?
127
Students expect a
quick response
Students expect a
quick response
128. JJooee uses ssoocciiaall mmeeddiiaa.. SShhoouulldd yyoouu??
128
Students want the option to
gain information from social
Students want the option to
gain information from social
media
media
129. Joe uses social media. Should you?
129
Instant
Instant
messaging online
is hugely valued
messaging online
is hugely valued
130. Joe has applied and now has offers
130
If they have
applied your
quality is good
enough, but are
you better than
If they have
applied your
quality is good
enough, but are
you better than
others?
others?
131. JJooee hhaass aapppplliieedd aanndd nnooww hhaass ooffffeerrss
131
If students apply to
If students apply to
multiple
multiple
universities, they
are enquiring to
universities, they
are enquiring to
even more
even more
132. JJooee has cchhoosseenn yyoouu…… bbuutt iitt’’ss nnoott oovveerr
132
Students expect you
Students expect you
to be the main
to be the main
support
support
133. Tweetable takeaways
@kiwimariec @hobsonsemea #StudyUK14
#international #students expect responses within 24 hours
#international #students expect instant chat and online
forum availability
45% of #international #students apply to 4 or more unis
133
134. What Joe expects
134
A quick, detailed response
That your website and online content is
engaging, easy to use, and accessible
At enquiry stage, you will inform of the
benefits of studying the subject and
having a UK education
145. Segmentation - find and recruit the right students
Understand choice components
Focus marketing spend
145
Summary
146. 146
QQ&&AA
If you want a copy of the
presentation or the
international student survey
please leave your card or
email me on
marie.clark@hobsons.com
147. Defining and Developing your approach to
employability: a framework for HEIs
Doug Cole Northumbria University and Maureen Tibby HEA
148. Employability
Reflect on what ‘employability’ means to you, your
team and stakeholders?
What is your working definition of ‘employability’?
148
151. Employability: the drivers
Government expectations
Relevance to global economy – Wilson Review (2012)
KIS, HEAR, employability strategies and statements
Institution expectations
Competition for students
Student expectations
Tuition fees, league tables, competitive labour market
Employer expectations
Need graduate skills, knowledge, attributes that support them to
be effective and competitive in a global labour market
Need graduates who are adaptable, flexible and resilient
Technology
151
152. What does the research tell us?
Employability: we have a
number of definitions & models
& we describe how we ‘do it’
There is very little in relation
to the praxis describing how
these two areas connect
What is the ‘rationale’ that
underpins all this work and what
holds it all together?
Why do we do what we do? What
are we not doing that we could
do? Have we got a joined up
approach?
How can we ‘wrap all of this up’ in
terms of defining an ‘approach’ to
employability?
152
153. A Framework for employability
The Context
HEA Teaching and Learning
Summit 2012
•HEIs under pressure to meet
expectations of students, employers
and the government
•Lack of clarity in how to adopt a
coherent approach to addressing
employability
Recommendation : develop a
framework for employability
•What is the ‘rationale’ that
underpins all this work and what
holds it all together?
•Why do we do what we do? What
are we not doing that we could do?
•How can we ‘wrap all of this up’ in
terms of defining an ‘approach’ to
employability?
153
154. Access the framework here:
https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/Employability_HEA 154
Framework for Employability
• Encourages reflection, discussion and action
• Engages by providing ownership of the process
• Supports by providing an underpinning structure
and process
156. 156
37 Higher Education Institutions supported to use the
employability framework and HEA support
–Enormous response to ‘call’
–Institutional and discipline led projects
–HEA Consultant support
–Visits
–Network events
–Resources and toolkits will be developed
–
6
HEA Employability Strategic Enhancement
Programme 2014-15
157. Questions?
Thank you for your time
Maureen Tibby Maureen.Tibby@heacademy.ac.uk
Doug Cole doug.cole@northumbria.ac.uk
157
158. Education: A Great British Export
Rod Bristow,
President, Pearson UK
Graham Able,
Chair, Exporting Education UK
In conversation with
Editor's Notes
Yes this is what we are truly like:
We see ourselves as an independent, private University for the professions. We centre our provision on educating the future professionals in Law, Banking and Finance, Accountancy, Dentistry, Nursing,;
- We have career-focussed students, Professionally focussed degrees. Expectations of professional dress, education that replicates the world of work – in dress, assessments and ethical expectations (tghe price our students pay),
- We have well-chosen city centre locations that are close to the professions they serve – Holborn, Gherking, all our regional sites are kin the commercial centres;
- We are committed to teaching and learning innovation in delivery, online facilities and physical spaces
- Our attitude to learning is fairly traditional – work hard, read widely and excel
- Professionals teaching professionals. Professionally qualified staff. BPP set up by accountants and the University built by lawyers. Must love teaching, appraised on teaching quality by students and monitored.
- With such parentage, it’s amazing we ever get to have fun.
674 (plus) private providers
160,000 students
54% of providers are for profit, with 39% not-for-profit and 6% ‘other’
217 fewer than 100
Most fewer than 500 students – Ave of 200
30 had more than 1000 students
5 had 5000 or more
1/3 non specialist, 1/3 Bus & Man, 10% religious, 10% arts, 5% Eng, 2% Alt Med
50% in London and as further 20+% in the South East
49% of students are from the UK, with 10% EU and 41% non-EU
12 years
Equivalent levels of student satisfaction (86%)
The unexpected for you.
Our tale of the unexpected began with dragon taming
What you may not have expected
Education Investor
Best post-16 education provider 2012
First proprietary company to gain DAP
Nobody has the summer off, or nay other time of the year for that matter
Leading law firms – exclusive relationships, BSB stats for the pupillages
Top Five Law School, 38 exclusive Law firms, 4 magic circle firms, most Bar pupillages
Innovative degree provision with employers in the Business School – Simmons and Simmons, KPMG, RBS
We would argue that in our core discipline areas, we are not without significance.
Our University governance structures are fairly traditional. Externality – 70 Ees, 6 Indep. Members of Council, 3 BoD, externals on validation panels, thematic reviews, appeals and mit circs boards. We have even gifted our voting powers. That’s how confident we are and how transparent and clean
Very little online. All blended, successful online provision
Scholarship – as linked to the professions. Must be relevant for someone in practice – students dissertations and faculty output.
We see ourselves as mainstream provision. Only when we encounter prejudice in how we are perceived, do we realize we are different. Very much in the narratives of the ‘Other’.
We are keen to play by the book and to the letter, satisfy all requirements
- Our DAP is on a lease, we are cautious and conservative with expansion
The Unexpected for us
All in 3 years since degree awarding powers. Int. Studnets risen from 4% to 30% in 1 year
We were used to Oxbridge/ Russell Group 2.1 and above PG students.
Catching up with growth and changing character of student body. Student support and advice provision has grown threefold
Flexibility is difficult – students want everything everyone else has. Regional sites are very resource intensive
Students want discipline and handholding, no choice in year 4
You cannot take 18 year olds, expect them to operate at the level of an Oxbridge graduate and kill them with multiple tough assessments in Term 1
Never stops
LLB, LLM, - students are attracted to the model of employment-focussed HE. Many of us are traditional liberal arts academics at heart.
No campus, rugby pitches, swimming pools, accommodation
I wouldn’t say with sharks. Data reporting expectations. Funded by student fees, no data teams or systems. Reporting systems are not entirely sophisticated to cope with the complexity of our provision.
Unequal among equals – to be capped and controlled. Uncertainty of political will, or dare I say whim
Focus on core subject areas, what we do well – professional education, accountancy, finance for BS.
Portfolio diversification – new degrees, new areas, first international partners. Nimble, programme validation
Raised tariff points, introduced even tougher checks on international agents and more stringent checks on international applicants
Keen to fit in, be accepted and respected full members of the HE club . With we accept full responsibilities, which must be about quality and standards and the best provision for the students. In University terms, this is deja vu history. The origins of many universities is in professional education, law and medicine specifically. New Universities were always feared and vilified, the civics in the UK, the ‘godless institution of Gower Street’. We are also conscious that established University models and values work. Since the middle ages, 50 institutions have survived. 47 of them are Universities.
As the director of quality, it is my duty to bore you with notions of the Kaizen philosophy of quality standards and continuous improvement, I’d like to share the standard after which we strive.
AS Levels now worth 40% AL in tariff points – but Bristol does not use the tariff.
Medicine will continue to ask for either 4th AS or AL – in line with other Medical Schools.
We are all here today because we are interested in international students.
We are interested in how to attract them to our institution.
There are more students than ever looking to study abroad, but equally there is an increasing crowd of institutions and providers looking to attract these students.
The organisations we work with, some 1500 globally and 60 in the UK, Europe and the Middle East, that we work with are a likeminded community, all wanting to know how they can stand out from that crowd.
Two months ago I was at the EAIE and its events like that and NAFSA that remind you that there is growing competition to attract international students.
Whether you recruit direct, through agents or by building partnerships.
Competition is global
The cost of recruiting these students is rising
The students have more choice
I’m interested in how people make their choices. When I started at Hobsons I was excited. For 10 years we have been directly communicating with students from around the world who were in the process of deciding if they wanted to leave their home country and study abroad.
Through our email exchanges, phone calls, our virtual events and our accepter or decliner surveys we have a very unique and robust data set and a very very large sample size. It’s something I realised that could tell us about why or why not students from around the wold chose particular universities and the factors that influenced their decision.
These are some of the figures from our UK sample set.
So two years abo we attempted our first survey of prospective international students looking to come and study in the UK.
Competing Globally our first survey of international students was sent to over 70,000 prospects and had over 5000 respondents
We wanted to understand components of choice – these are the major factors that influence student decision making either to study abroad, to study in the UK or to study at a particular institution. It allows us to better anticipate what the students want, increase efficiency and provide more tailored support.
We wanted to understand student decision making insight and the things that were important at each stage of the process…
One of the key things that we found, which was basically just confirmation of what we already knew was that teaching quality was the most important component of choice.
Another thing we found was that there are clear and distinct groups of students – 7 in fact.
CLICK
In summary – what I am going to be talking you through today is based on this year’s survey –Sent to over 100,000 and had over 18,000 responses
We also grew the survey taking in students enquiring to Australian universities.
This year we went out to 100,000 enquirers and had 18,000 responses.
What I am going to be talking you through today is based on this year’s survey and an overview of the student journey and whats important at each stage.
Take you on an average journey
The reason we do it this way is because, although we are talking about thousands of students, aggregated – we always want to keep in mind that each student is an individual and deserves a great experience.
We’ve used Jo Chan, mainly because there were in fact 4 Jo Chans in the responses.
So Jo is the average student – from China, wants to study PG business and around 24 years old
But the data that I am about to talk you through is not just about Chinese students, it is all students – the overall cohort.
This was a key question for us.
When they are thinking about studying abroad in what order do they think about first?
Is it the country they want to go to?
Is it the university that they want to go to?
Or is it the subject they want to study?
Now it won’t surprise you that when they sit down at their computer – they are thinking subject.
40% say subject is their first consideration.
Its what comes next that is interesting. For most students the next thing that they think about is the country – not the institution.
The bit of advice that we are giving clients based on this is that when you are marketing to students, even at enquiry stage make sure we are giving subject specific information up front. How that subject will benefit them.
More benefits of studying abroad.
Many UK unis doing exchange programmes and cheaper here.
So the next bit of advice we give to universities based in the UK is that they aren’t just competing with other UK universities – they are competing on a global stage for these students.
This graph shows just the students interested in studying in the UK and we asked them what the main other countries that those students were interested in studying in.
Its not surprising that the UK comes out on top and that some of our traditional competitors come out so strongly. We were surprised, despite what you might read that European countries came out so low – around the 5% mark.
The difference that we saw between this year and last was that Germany, although still with comparatively small numbers is rising.
What this means for you is to remember that students that are interested in studying in the UK or Australia are not exclusively interested in studying in the UK or Australia– they are considering other options. This presents an opportunity for all of you not from the UK.
At an institutional level you need to remember that you are competing globally and be prepared to talk about how not only your institution but the UK will provide the benefits that the student is looking for.
So when it comes to the country…of course the quality of the education is paramount.
Quality of education compared to home country and international recognition of qualifications are up there on top.
What is interesting really the third and fourth factors. These are the ones that I want to highlight.
The country’s attitude and safety, or at least perceptions of safety, come out very highly.
UK universities aren’t helped here with the rhetoric at a government level – visa changes and headlines don’t help them – the recent Universities Report only serves to highlight the impact this has and will continue to have.
In the absence of something centralised, anything that we can include in our marketing messages to reassure students about the welcome that they will receive or the safety of the country will be invaluable.
The same applies elsewhere too. In Australia when they had poor publicity around Indian students – their numbers dropped dramatically.
We recommend to universities that they are prepared to respond with emails or calls to their prospective students if there is an incident at a national level and a good example are the riots three years ago – across all our university partners – not just those based in London – started getting phone calls and emails from worried students.
So we know that high quality online content is important. But how do they consume it.
Mobile is increasingly important, but in general the big screen remains king. They are looking at their laptops their home computers or in internet cafes.
You need to be prepared for it all – but know that it will mostly be consumed on the big screen.
We know that agents are important.
What we were interested in is, at enquiry stage, how important did students think they would be?
The vast majority say that they won’t or don’t intends to use an agent.
There is a clear disconnect here – because we know that the vast majority do use an agent and in particular countries this very important.
But they don’t think they will need to – so when do things change….
What can you do to reduce agent spend (if that is what you want to do) and help students be self service. Can you give them more information?
Now that Joe knows where to go we wanted to know what he is looking for.
What should you be putting front and centre?
Not surprisingly teaching quality and academic rankings.
But I’ve highlighted three.
You might have seen a study portals report last month. In the study, student researchers “mystery shopped” 448 universities in 38 countries. Twenty-one percent of the universities did not respond to the students’ e-mails.
Joe and students like him is demanding.
The expects a quick response.
He expects a detailed reply within three days or a short reply within 24 hours.
I know that some of you will have hundreds of emails per day. That is a challenge for you. We are running other webinars on how to make this process easier and personalise responses but for now I wanted to focus on one thing and that is the phone calls down the bottom.
Students don’t expect a phone call – but what if they got one? If you are looking to stand out from the crowd…why not. We know that calling at enquiry stage exceeds expectations and in come markets can double conversion rates.
Next big question.
Joe uses social media – should you?
What do they expect.
They expect facebook, youtube and regional alternatives – what is interesting is what they’d like you to have…
This is media that they’d like to see you on.
Internet forums like College Confidential or the Student Room.
Instant messaging and chat forums.
What this tells us is they want instant and personalised responses.
Now on to the big question – Joe wanted teaching quality – but what does this actually mean?
Once they have applied to you, you have hopefully by in large answered any questions about if you are good enough.
Now it becomes about being better than others.
Responsiveness slips right down the list and things like facilities shoot up.
Know who your competition is and channel why you are better.
Why is it important to be better – because we know that the vast majority of students plan to apply to four or more universities.
However…just going back to enquiry stage – if they plan to apply to 4 just think how many they are enquiring to.
Which makes what I said about responsiveness earlier so important. Stand out from that huge crowd.
How can you make sure you go from a pool of say 10 to 20 to 4 to five to the chosen one?
So we talked about agent usage before.
Visas are often the main things that students use agents for.
We wanted to know about support. Who do they think will help them – well the good news is its you!
Again how can you support them to be more self service?
In summary
Most universities have about 20% at might convert. The preenrolment experience dictates what percentage of that 20% actually enrol.
This is for offered prospects
Employability is high on the agenda
HEIs are under pressure to meet the expectations of students, employers and the Government
There is pressure to ensure that graduates emerging from the HE system have the knowledge, skills, attributes and creativity to contribute to economic growth in new business environments and a competitive global labour market. Technology has changed the way we communicate and has (and will continue to) impact on roles and working practices. Graduates need to be able deal effectively with this, adaptability, flexibility and resilience are increasingly important.
The introduction of KIS, employability statements and the HEAR underline that employability is a core aspect of the undergraduate offer.
The Wilson Review (2012 of business-university collaboration made a number of key recommendations regarding university and business engagement and ensuring that all students have access to work experience.
Authors: Doug Cole Northumbria University and Maureen Tibby Higher Education Academy
HEA offers bespoke training for institutions on how to use this process to support their employability policy and practice
During 2014/15, 37 institutions will be supported to use the framework and HEA support to support employability policy and practice. Will also lead to development of new resources and toolkits to support the use of the framework and employability policy and practice.