SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 60
Download to read offline
LA-950 Laser Diffraction
Analyzer
mark.bumiller@horiba.com

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Laser Diffraction
Particle size 0.01 – 3000 µm

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Low End Sensitivity

30, 40, 50, 70 nm
latex standards

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Low End Sensitivity
Sensitivity: small particle detection
30 nm silica

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

40 nm latex
30 nm Colloidal Silica: DLS Data

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Low End Sensitivity: Pigments
100

40

90

35

80
30

q(%)

25

60
50

20

40

15

30
10
20
5

0
0.010

10

0.100

1.000
Diameter(µm)

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

0
10.00

UnderSize(%)

70
Low End Sensitivity: Cosmetics
Some (unfounded?) concerns
with particles <100nm
LA-950 good at determining sub
100nm particles
Software set to display % under
any given size
Data shown left is for skin cream
and TiO2 suspension
See Cosmetics Application Note:

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Monitoring Size Reduction

* See http://www.microfluidicscorp.com/

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Ceria: Before, After Processing

Laser diffraction required for before sample
© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Liposome: Before, After Processing

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
PLA Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery

9 fold increase

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
PLA Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery
Pure

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Spiked with 1 µm PSL
Dynamic Range: High end
14

100

90
12
80
10

70

60
q(%)

8
50
6
40

30

4

20
2
10

0
10.00

100.0

1000
Diameter(µm)

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

0
3000

Coffee Results
Dynamic Range: High end: Soils

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Soils Accessory: Slurry Sampler
15, 30, or 60 position auto sampling
Optional magnetic stirrer base plate
Sample mixed, removed from cup,
delivered to LA-950 for analysis

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Other Liquid Accessories
Miniflow
35-55 mL liquid
W or w/o ultrasound

Fraction Cell
10 or 15 mL liquid
Magnetic stirrer

Paste Cell
Sample pressed between
two windows
© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Small Sample Volume (MiniFlow)

Colloidal Silica (weak scatterer)
Median (D50): 35 nm
Sample Amount: 132 mg

Magnesium Stearate
Median (D50): 9.33 μm
Sample Amount: 0.165 mg

Bio-degradable Polymer
Median (D50): 114 μm
Sample Amount: 1.29 mg

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Built in Ultrasonic Probe
Specifications

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reproducibility: Dry Powder Feeder
Direct flow of
powder down to
cell rather than
turn 90o, then
around plastic
tube

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reproducibility: Dry Powder Feeder
Automatic control of sample feed rate
LA-950 monitors amount of sample
supplied by the vibratory feeder. Automatic
feed back control keeps constant mass
flow rate of powder during measurement
This is CRITICAL
– More reproducible, robust
– No ghost peaks
– No cutting off results

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reproducibility – Mg Stearate Dry

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Unique Software features
“Multifunctions”
To compute
individual distribution
size from multimodal
sample distribution

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Unique Software features
 Method expert function
 To study and develop method conditions
 Search of best analytical conditions (pump speed, acquisition time,
us time power….)
 Search of best calculation conditions (Refractive Indexes)
 Set a Navigation program including all improved parameters

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Unique Software features
 Analytical conditions

 Calculation conditions

View Method Expert webinar
on website (Download Center)

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Automated RI computation
 Real part study
 Need to fix imaginary part
 Set up to 5 real parts
 Software will compute all RI and display R parameter
variation with RI selection

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Automated RI computation
 Imaginary part study
 Need to fix real part
 Set up to 5 imaginary parts
 Software will compute all RI and display R parameter
variation with RI selection

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Automated RI computation
“Method Expert”- Final RI study

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Accuracy: Error Calculations
Emulsion Sample

Figure
3

yi
y (xi)
i
N

The measured scattered light at each channel (i) of the detector.
The calculated scattered light at each channel (i) of the detector based on the chosen refractive index kernel and
reported particle size distribution.
The standard deviation of the scattered light intensity at each channel (i) of the detector. A larger i indicates lower
reliability of the signal on a given detector.
The number of detectors used for the calculation

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Specifications:Accuracy and Precision

LOW ACCURACY
LOW PRECISION

LOW ACCURACY
HIGH PRECISION

HIGH ACCURACY
LOW PRECISION

HIGH ACCURACY
HIGH PRECISION

(A) Low accuracy, low precision measurements form a diffuse, off-center cluster;
(B) Low accuracy, high precision measurements form a tight off-center cluster; (C)
High accuracy, low precision measurements form a cluster that is evenly distributed
but distant from the center of the target; (D) High Accuracy, high precision
measurements are clustered in the center of the target.

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Accuracy
Comparison to referee technique
Microscope (image analysis) is referee
technique for particle characterization

Challenged with particle size standards
Monodisperse latex spheres
– Verifies optics
– May pass even if problems with sampler

Polydisperse glass spheres
– Verifies complete system
– Should find problems with samplers

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Accuracy
Verification following accepted practices
using polydisperse standards:
ISO13320 and USP <429>
– D50 deviates < 3% from certified range
– D10 & D90 deviate < 5%
AND
– COV D50 < 3%
– COV D10 & D90 < 5%
Note: Coefficient of Variation = (standard deviation/mean)*100
also called RSD
© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Accuracy Test: PS202
PS202 (3-30µm)

D10

D50

D90

Standard Value (µm)

9.14

13.43

20.34

Uncertainty (µm)

0.86

0.86

1.44

5%

3%

5%

Lower limit (µm)

7.866

12.193

17.955

Measured Result (µm)

9.721

13.916

18.959

10.500

14.719

22.869

ISO standard error

Upper Limit (µm)

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Accuracy Test: PS 225
PS225 (50-350µm)

D50

D90

Standard Value (µm)

93.7

150.5

238.8

Uncertainty (µm)

3.54

2.52

6.02

ISO standard error

5%

3%

5%

Lower limit (µm)

85.652

143.541

221.141

Measured Result (µm)

94.217

153.815

252.542

Upper Limit (µm)

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

D10

102.102

157.611

257.061
Accuracy Test: PS 181
PS181 (0.1-1µm)

D50

D90

Standard Value (µm)

0.36

0.65

1.11

Uncertainty (µm)

0.06

0.06

0.13

ISO standard error

5%

3%

5%

Lower limit (µm)

0.285

0.5723

0.931

Measured Result (µm)

0.434

0.709

1.296

Upper Limit (µm)

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

D10

0.441

0.7313

1.302
Mix of 50/50 PS202 & 225

Excellent baseline resolution: 48/52 calculated proportions

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Mixed Standards
5 parts PS225 to
1 part PS202

5 parts PS225 to
1 part PS181

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Resolution
 Ability to measure small differences in
particle size
 Small differences between successive
samples (different production lots) are most
important
 Detection limit of small amount of material
outside of main size distribution
 Best defined by user’s real-world
requirements

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Resolution
 Resolve size difference
between two materials of
similar size.
 552nm and 600nm PSL
 Can separate peaks
when measured
separately
 Would merge into one
peak if measured
together

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Resolution: Small Particles
83nm,
204nm,
503nm
PSL

Resolution of multiple modes in a single
sample.
© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Resolution: Large Particles
100µm,
200µm,
400µm
glass
beads

Resolution of multiple modes in a
single sample.
© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Resolution: Small Amount of Second Peak
 0.1 micron
silica material
 2% by weight
of ~1 micron
quartz
standard
added

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Precision (Repeatability)
Repeatability: Measuring the same sample multiple
times as it recirculates within the system
24 Samplings of Polystyrene Latex
30

25

Frequency %

20

15

10

5

-5

0.
19
7
0.
25
8
0.
33
9
0.
44
5
0.
58
3
0.
76
5
1.
00
4
1.
31
8
1.
72
9
2.
26
8
2.
97
6
3.
90
4
5.
12
2
6.
71
9
8.
81
5

0.
15

0.
11
4

0

Size (microns)

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
LA-950 Accuracy & Precision Data
Accuracy and Precision for PSL Standards
Standard value

102nm

491nm

1.02um

12.01um

102um

1004um

Tolerance

3nm

4nm

0.022um

0.07um

1.4um

14um

1

104.41

489.41

1.021

11.97

102.64

1001.14

2

104.39

489.28

1.019

11.97

102.66

1000.20

3

104.39

490.24

1.019

11.97

102.73

1001.49

4

104.33

489.52

1.021

11.96

102.70

1001.28

5

104.38

489.55

1.019

11.97

102.73

1000.14

6

104.36

489.52

1.021

11.97

102.74

1000.27

7

104.36

489.50

1.019

11.97

102.76

1001.67

8

104.35

489.91

1.021

11.96

102.74

1001.22

9

104.37

488.99

1.021

11.97

102.74

1000.76

10

104.34

489.68

1.021

11.97

102.76

1000.45

Average

104.37

489.56

1.020

11.97

102.72

1000.86

Std. Dev.

0.024

0.321

0.001

0.004

0.039

0.540

CV

0.02%

0.07%

0.10%

0.03%

0.04%

0.05%

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA): BCR-66*
Summary of Fit
Rsquare
Adj Rsquare
Root Mean Square Error
Mean of Response
Observations

BCR-66 10%

0.46
0.45
0.44
0.43
0.42
0.41
0.4
EVD70000

H000DU07

Serial Number

Each Pair
Student's t
0.05

1.23

BCR-66 50%

1.2
1.17
1.14
1.11
1.08
1.05
1.02
EVD70000

H000DU07

Serial Number

Each Pair
Student's t
0.05

2.45
BCR-66 90%

2.4
2.35
2.3
2.25
2.2
2.15
2.1

10%
0.02698
-0.03384
0.02654
0.4356
18

50%
0.03032
-0.03029
0.01566
1.1276
18

90%
0.02330
-0.03775
0.07936
2.2553
18

t Test
Difference
Std Err Dif
Upper CL Dif
Lower CL Dif
Confidence
t Ratio
DF
Prob > |t|

10%
0.00833
0.01251
0.03486
-0.01819
0.95
0.6660
16
0.5149

50%
0.00522
0.00738
0.02088
-0.01043
0.95
0.7072
16
0.4896

90%
0.02311
0.03741
0.1024
-0.05619
0.95
0.6178
16
0.5454

Tool Difference
EVD70000
H000DU07
Grand Mean
Difference of Tools
% Difference
Tolerance Level

0.47

10%
0.4314
0.4398
0.4356
-0.00833
-1.91%

50%
1.1250
1.1302
1.1276
-0.00522
-0.46%
±10%

90%
2.2438
2.2669
2.2553
-0.02311
-1.02%

2.05
EVD70000

H000DU07

Serial Number

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Each Pair
Student's t
0.05

*see AN146 LA-950 Repeatability Study on www.horiba.com
Reproducibility
Prepare sample, measure, drain, repeat
What would be good reproducibility?
Test COV according to ISO13320
CV < 3% at D50
CV < 5% at D10 & D 90
Double values if D50 <10 m

Test COV according to USP<429>
CV < 10% at D50
CV < 15% at D10 & D 90
Double values if D50 <10 m
© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Automatic Reproducibility Calculations
 ISO13320-1-1999 “Particle size analysis — Laser
diffraction methods — Part 1: General principles
 EP 2.9.31 “Laser Diffraction Measurement of
Particle Size”; Lead for this monograph
 Appearance in Pharmacopeial Forum 28, Number
3 2002
 Now in USP 28, NF25
– in Stage 4 of the harmonization process with
the EP and the JP

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Software Automation

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Qualification: Accuracy and Repeatability
 Use polydisperse standard
 Three independent measurements, calculate
mean
 X50 <3% “certified range of values”
 X10 & X90 < 5% “certified range of values”
 Also check repeatability
 COV X50 < 3%
 COV X10 & X90 < 5%
See Verification webinar on website

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Software Automation

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Qualification in Practice

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Accuracy & Precision Specifications
Accuracy – Guaranteed!
•+/- 0.6% on NIST-traceable polystyrene latex calibration standards
•3% on d50 (median) for broad-distribution glass bead standards
•5% on d10 and d90 for broad-distribution glass bead standards
Meets or exceeds all requirements of ISO 13320 and USP 429

Precision – 0.1%

The combination of a rigid optical bench, stable, high-intensity light sources, optimized detectors,
and highly-refined electronics virtually eliminates variability in the background noise and
fluctuations in the response of the instrument. The Partica LA-950 has a guaranteed precision of
0.1% on polystyrene latex calibration standards

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Instrument to Instrument Variation
Minimized Instrument to Instrument Variation

As a result of each instrument being extremely accurate and precise, the variation in results from
instrument to instrument is decreased. This is particularly important when multiple units are
installed at different production facilities or when comparing data from supplier to customer.

Sample

CV D10

CV D50

CV D90

PS202 (3-30µm)

2%

1%

2%

PS213 (10-100µm)

2%

2%

2%

PS225 (50-350µm)

1%

1%

1%

PS235 (150-650µm)

1%

1%

2%

PS240 (500-2000µm)

3%

2%

2%

All samples measured on 20 different instruments

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Customer Data: Intermediate Precision

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Design of Intermediate Precision Experiments
N = 6 Assays
Day-1 Analyst-1 Instrument-1
N = 6 Assays
Day-1 Analyst-2 Instrument-1
N = 6 Assays
Day-1 Analyst-1 Instrument-2
N = 6 Assays
Day-1 Analyst-2 Instrument-2
N = 6 Assays
Day-2 Analyst-1 Instrument-1
N = 6 Assays
Day-2 Analyst-2 Instrument-1
N = 6 Assays
Day-2 Analyst-1 Instrument-2
N = 6 Assays
Day-2 Analyst-2 Instrument-2
Customer Data: LA-910 Intermediate Precision
Analyst
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

Day
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

Instr.#
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2

Grand RSD
Replicate Dmean (nm) D5(nm)
1
107
45
2
107
45
3
106
45
4
107
45
5
106
45
6
103
45
1
102
44
2
101
44
3
101
44
4
100
44
5
101
44
6
98
44
1
108
45
2
108
45
3
106
45
4
107
45
5
107
45
6
106
45
1
103
44
2
103
44
3
102
44
4
102
44
5
102
44
6
101
44
1
107
45
2
107
45
3
105
45
4
106
45
5
106
45
6
106
45
1
102
44
2
100
44
3
100
44
4
100
44
5
100
44
6
99
44
1
109
45
2
108
45
3
107
45
4
106
45
5
106
45
6
106
45
1
103
44
2
104
44
3
103
44
4
102
44
5
101
44
6
101
44

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

D10(nm)
56
56
56
56
55
55
53
53
53
53
53
53
56
56
56
56
56
56
53
53
53
53
53
53
55
55
55
55
55
55
53
53
53
53
53
53
56
56
56
55
55
56
54
53
53
53
54
54

D50(nm)
95
95
94
95
94
93
88
87
87
87
87
87
96
96
95
95
95
95
89
88
89
88
88
88
94
94
93
93
93
93
88
87
87
86
87
87
97
96
95
94
94
94
89
89
88
88
88
89

D90(nm)
171
171
168
170
169
163
165
163
162
161
161
152
172
171
168
169
169
168
166
167
165
164
164
163
172
173
168
170
171
169
164
161
158
158
159
157
176
174
170
169
170
169
165
169
167
165
162
161

D95(nm)
211
210
206
209
208
195
200
206
202
201
202
188
212
210
205
208
208
206
211
210
207
206
206
205
214
216
207
212
213
208
209
202
198
199
200
197
216
214
208
208
209
207
209
217
212
210
203
200

Dmean (nm) D5(nm)
Average
104
45
STDEV
3.0
0.5
% RSD
2.8
1.1
RSD limit
6%
10%

Grand RSD
D10(nm) D50(nm)
54
91
1.3
3.5
2.4
3.9
10%
6%

D90(nm)
166
5.0
3.0
10%

D95(nm)
207
5.8
2.8
10%
Instrument to instrument variability: LA-910

6-8 Instruments:
Formulation Dmean
sd (nm)
A
2.8
B
4.5
C
9.5
D
10.6
E
8.7
F
9.2

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

D10
sd (nm)
2.1
7.1
6.5
7.9
5.4
10.0

D50
sd (nm)
3.5
4.7
9.5
10.1
8.7
9.5

D90
sd (nm)
2.1
6.9
12.2
18.2
19.4
14.6

Dmean
rsd (%)
2.8
2.6
6.1
5.9
5.4
6.0

D10
rsd (%)
3.4
6.0
6.5
7.0
5.5
10.7

D50
rsd (%)
3.6
2.8
6.5
5.9
5.7
6.6

D90
rsd (%)
1.5
2.9
5.4
7.0
8.1
6.4
Customer Data: LA-950 Precision
LA-950 # 1:
Formulation 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
Std Dev
RSD

Dmean
156
155
155
156
154
155
155
0.8
0.5

D5
113
112
112
113
111
112
112
0.8
0.7

D10
120
119
119
119
119
119
119
0.5
0.4

D50
154
153
153
154
152
152
153
1.0
0.6

D90
195
194
194
195
193
194
194
0.8
0.4

D95
209
208
208
209
207
208
208
0.7
0.4

Dmean
154
154
155
155
154
155
155
0.5
0.3

D5
112
112
113
113
112
112
112
0.5
0.5

D10
119
119
119
119
119
119
119
0.0
0.0

D50
152
152
152
152
152
153
152
0.6
0.4

D90
192
192
192
193
193
193
192
0.3
0.1

D95
208
208
208
208
207
208
208
0.5
0.3

LA-950 #2:
Formulation 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
Std Dev
RSD

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Instrument to instrument variability: LA-950

4 Instruments:
Formulation 1
Average (nm)
Std Dev (nm)
RSD (%)

Dmean
155
0.8
0.5

D5
112
0.8
0.7

D10
119
0.7
0.6

D50
152
1.0
0.6

D90
193
1.1
0.6

D95
208
0.7
0.3

Formulation 2
Average (nm)
Std Dev (nm)
RSD (%)

Dmean
193
1.5
0.8

D5
136
0.5
0.4

D10
147
0.4
0.3

D50
187
0.6
0.3

D90
247
0.4
0.2

D95
264
1.1
0.4

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reliability and Support
 LA-950 (V1) launched in 2004, hundreds of
installations, not a single light source or detector
failure yet
 Full applications support worldwide
 Application labs in US (x2), France, Germany, Japan
(x2), Singapore, China (x2), Korea

 Two day hands-on training course in NJ and CA
 Web based training – all lectures from 2 day
diffraction training course
 HORIBA: a brand you can trust

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conclusions
Most advanced laser diffraction
analyzer available
LA-950 publishes most detailed
performance specifications
Best small particle sensitivity
High performance across entire
dynamic range: wet and dry
Most automated software to test both
accuracy and reproducibility
© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Q&A
Ask a question at labinfo@horiba.com
Keep reading the monthly HORIBA Particle
e-mail newsletter!
Visit the Download Center to find the video
and slides from this webinar.

© 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

More Related Content

What's hot

Reliance industries Ltd.- Overview & Swot Analysis
Reliance industries Ltd.- Overview & Swot AnalysisReliance industries Ltd.- Overview & Swot Analysis
Reliance industries Ltd.- Overview & Swot AnalysisAbhishek Singh
 
Pycnomatic presentation
Pycnomatic presentationPycnomatic presentation
Pycnomatic presentationRandy Israel
 
Financial analysis of Ril & competitors
Financial analysis of Ril & competitorsFinancial analysis of Ril & competitors
Financial analysis of Ril & competitorsVikram Dahiya
 
Technical Best Practices for Veritas and Microsoft Azure Using a Detailed Ref...
Technical Best Practices for Veritas and Microsoft Azure Using a Detailed Ref...Technical Best Practices for Veritas and Microsoft Azure Using a Detailed Ref...
Technical Best Practices for Veritas and Microsoft Azure Using a Detailed Ref...Veritas Technologies LLC
 
OST Christ University Lavasa
OST Christ University LavasaOST Christ University Lavasa
OST Christ University LavasaSumanth Pulaganti
 
Real-time Data Pipelines with SAP and Apache Kafka
Real-time Data Pipelines with SAP and Apache KafkaReal-time Data Pipelines with SAP and Apache Kafka
Real-time Data Pipelines with SAP and Apache KafkaCarole Gunst
 
Kuching | Jan-15 | Hydro Power Development in Sarawak: Opportunities & Challe...
Kuching | Jan-15 | Hydro Power Development in Sarawak: Opportunities & Challe...Kuching | Jan-15 | Hydro Power Development in Sarawak: Opportunities & Challe...
Kuching | Jan-15 | Hydro Power Development in Sarawak: Opportunities & Challe...Smart Villages
 
VRIO Analysis Tata.pptx
VRIO Analysis Tata.pptxVRIO Analysis Tata.pptx
VRIO Analysis Tata.pptxPalakSinha14
 
MDO Concept - An answer to Indian captive coal mining
MDO Concept - An answer to Indian captive coal miningMDO Concept - An answer to Indian captive coal mining
MDO Concept - An answer to Indian captive coal miningTapas Das
 
BCG Matrix of TATA Group
BCG Matrix of TATA GroupBCG Matrix of TATA Group
BCG Matrix of TATA GroupSimran Sharma
 
Tata corus mergers -----final
Tata corus mergers -----finalTata corus mergers -----final
Tata corus mergers -----finalJonty Mohta
 
Webnesday - Introduction to LoRaWAN
Webnesday - Introduction to LoRaWANWebnesday - Introduction to LoRaWAN
Webnesday - Introduction to LoRaWANMartin Haas
 
Security in the blockchain
Security in the blockchainSecurity in the blockchain
Security in the blockchainBellaj Badr
 

What's hot (17)

Reliance industries Ltd.- Overview & Swot Analysis
Reliance industries Ltd.- Overview & Swot AnalysisReliance industries Ltd.- Overview & Swot Analysis
Reliance industries Ltd.- Overview & Swot Analysis
 
Pycnomatic presentation
Pycnomatic presentationPycnomatic presentation
Pycnomatic presentation
 
Financial analysis of Ril & competitors
Financial analysis of Ril & competitorsFinancial analysis of Ril & competitors
Financial analysis of Ril & competitors
 
Technical Best Practices for Veritas and Microsoft Azure Using a Detailed Ref...
Technical Best Practices for Veritas and Microsoft Azure Using a Detailed Ref...Technical Best Practices for Veritas and Microsoft Azure Using a Detailed Ref...
Technical Best Practices for Veritas and Microsoft Azure Using a Detailed Ref...
 
OST Christ University Lavasa
OST Christ University LavasaOST Christ University Lavasa
OST Christ University Lavasa
 
Real-time Data Pipelines with SAP and Apache Kafka
Real-time Data Pipelines with SAP and Apache KafkaReal-time Data Pipelines with SAP and Apache Kafka
Real-time Data Pipelines with SAP and Apache Kafka
 
Kuching | Jan-15 | Hydro Power Development in Sarawak: Opportunities & Challe...
Kuching | Jan-15 | Hydro Power Development in Sarawak: Opportunities & Challe...Kuching | Jan-15 | Hydro Power Development in Sarawak: Opportunities & Challe...
Kuching | Jan-15 | Hydro Power Development in Sarawak: Opportunities & Challe...
 
Cipla ltd
Cipla ltdCipla ltd
Cipla ltd
 
VRIO Analysis Tata.pptx
VRIO Analysis Tata.pptxVRIO Analysis Tata.pptx
VRIO Analysis Tata.pptx
 
MDO Concept - An answer to Indian captive coal mining
MDO Concept - An answer to Indian captive coal miningMDO Concept - An answer to Indian captive coal mining
MDO Concept - An answer to Indian captive coal mining
 
Titan
TitanTitan
Titan
 
TATA Global Beverages
TATA Global BeveragesTATA Global Beverages
TATA Global Beverages
 
BCG Matrix of TATA Group
BCG Matrix of TATA GroupBCG Matrix of TATA Group
BCG Matrix of TATA Group
 
Tata corus mergers -----final
Tata corus mergers -----finalTata corus mergers -----final
Tata corus mergers -----final
 
Webnesday - Introduction to LoRaWAN
Webnesday - Introduction to LoRaWANWebnesday - Introduction to LoRaWAN
Webnesday - Introduction to LoRaWAN
 
Security in the blockchain
Security in the blockchainSecurity in the blockchain
Security in the blockchain
 
Tata motors
Tata motorsTata motors
Tata motors
 

Similar to Advantages of the LA-950 Laser Diffraction PSA

Introducing the LA-960 Laser Particle Size Analyzer
Introducing the LA-960 Laser Particle Size AnalyzerIntroducing the LA-960 Laser Particle Size Analyzer
Introducing the LA-960 Laser Particle Size AnalyzerHORIBA Particle
 
Particle Classroom Series IV: System Verification
Particle Classroom Series IV: System VerificationParticle Classroom Series IV: System Verification
Particle Classroom Series IV: System VerificationHORIBA Particle
 
Hygienic Turbidity Meter for Food and Beverage Industry
Hygienic Turbidity Meter for Food and Beverage IndustryHygienic Turbidity Meter for Food and Beverage Industry
Hygienic Turbidity Meter for Food and Beverage IndustryInstrument Specialties, Inc.
 
Modern Particle Characterization Techniques Series: Laser Diffraction
Modern Particle Characterization Techniques Series: Laser DiffractionModern Particle Characterization Techniques Series: Laser Diffraction
Modern Particle Characterization Techniques Series: Laser DiffractionHORIBA Particle
 
Model SB 5500 Wheel Balancing Unit by Schmitt Industries
Model SB 5500 Wheel Balancing Unit by Schmitt IndustriesModel SB 5500 Wheel Balancing Unit by Schmitt Industries
Model SB 5500 Wheel Balancing Unit by Schmitt IndustriesMachine Tool Systems Inc.
 
Micro e systems_ops_ds_datasheet
Micro e systems_ops_ds_datasheetMicro e systems_ops_ds_datasheet
Micro e systems_ops_ds_datasheetElectromate
 
Tackling nanobubble characterization challenges
Tackling nanobubble characterization challengesTackling nanobubble characterization challenges
Tackling nanobubble characterization challengesMalvern Instruments
 
Portable-Turbidity-Meter.pdf
Portable-Turbidity-Meter.pdfPortable-Turbidity-Meter.pdf
Portable-Turbidity-Meter.pdflabmate
 
Process Sensors Corp Presentation
Process Sensors Corp PresentationProcess Sensors Corp Presentation
Process Sensors Corp PresentationPatssfan
 
Portable-ELISA-Reader.pdf
Portable-ELISA-Reader.pdfPortable-ELISA-Reader.pdf
Portable-ELISA-Reader.pdflabotronicsmary
 
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (5" 3D)
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (5" 3D)NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (5" 3D)
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (5" 3D)Kvikoo
 
NTEK Dodecahedral Sound Source
NTEK Dodecahedral Sound SourceNTEK Dodecahedral Sound Source
NTEK Dodecahedral Sound SourceKvikoo
 
LS13320. 17 nm - 2000 microns
LS13320. 17 nm -  2000 micronsLS13320. 17 nm -  2000 microns
LS13320. 17 nm - 2000 micronsadityahpatel
 
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" HP)
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" HP)NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" HP)
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" HP)Kvikoo
 
Characterizing Nanoparticles used in Bio Applications
Characterizing Nanoparticles used in Bio ApplicationsCharacterizing Nanoparticles used in Bio Applications
Characterizing Nanoparticles used in Bio ApplicationsHORIBA Particle
 
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" LT)
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" LT)NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" LT)
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" LT)Kvikoo
 

Similar to Advantages of the LA-950 Laser Diffraction PSA (20)

Introducing the LA-960 Laser Particle Size Analyzer
Introducing the LA-960 Laser Particle Size AnalyzerIntroducing the LA-960 Laser Particle Size Analyzer
Introducing the LA-960 Laser Particle Size Analyzer
 
Particle Classroom Series IV: System Verification
Particle Classroom Series IV: System VerificationParticle Classroom Series IV: System Verification
Particle Classroom Series IV: System Verification
 
Clean air experts
Clean air expertsClean air experts
Clean air experts
 
Measuring instruments
Measuring instrumentsMeasuring instruments
Measuring instruments
 
Hygienic Turbidity Meter for Food and Beverage Industry
Hygienic Turbidity Meter for Food and Beverage IndustryHygienic Turbidity Meter for Food and Beverage Industry
Hygienic Turbidity Meter for Food and Beverage Industry
 
Modern Particle Characterization Techniques Series: Laser Diffraction
Modern Particle Characterization Techniques Series: Laser DiffractionModern Particle Characterization Techniques Series: Laser Diffraction
Modern Particle Characterization Techniques Series: Laser Diffraction
 
Model SB 5500 Wheel Balancing Unit by Schmitt Industries
Model SB 5500 Wheel Balancing Unit by Schmitt IndustriesModel SB 5500 Wheel Balancing Unit by Schmitt Industries
Model SB 5500 Wheel Balancing Unit by Schmitt Industries
 
Micro e systems_ops_ds_datasheet
Micro e systems_ops_ds_datasheetMicro e systems_ops_ds_datasheet
Micro e systems_ops_ds_datasheet
 
Tackling nanobubble characterization challenges
Tackling nanobubble characterization challengesTackling nanobubble characterization challenges
Tackling nanobubble characterization challenges
 
Portable-Turbidity-Meter.pdf
Portable-Turbidity-Meter.pdfPortable-Turbidity-Meter.pdf
Portable-Turbidity-Meter.pdf
 
Pon OtdRs Sun Ot7000
Pon OtdRs Sun Ot7000Pon OtdRs Sun Ot7000
Pon OtdRs Sun Ot7000
 
Process Sensors Corp Presentation
Process Sensors Corp PresentationProcess Sensors Corp Presentation
Process Sensors Corp Presentation
 
Portable-ELISA-Reader.pdf
Portable-ELISA-Reader.pdfPortable-ELISA-Reader.pdf
Portable-ELISA-Reader.pdf
 
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (5" 3D)
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (5" 3D)NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (5" 3D)
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (5" 3D)
 
แค๊ตตาล็อก หัวโพรบ Renishaw omp400
แค๊ตตาล็อก หัวโพรบ Renishaw omp400แค๊ตตาล็อก หัวโพรบ Renishaw omp400
แค๊ตตาล็อก หัวโพรบ Renishaw omp400
 
NTEK Dodecahedral Sound Source
NTEK Dodecahedral Sound SourceNTEK Dodecahedral Sound Source
NTEK Dodecahedral Sound Source
 
LS13320. 17 nm - 2000 microns
LS13320. 17 nm -  2000 micronsLS13320. 17 nm -  2000 microns
LS13320. 17 nm - 2000 microns
 
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" HP)
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" HP)NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" HP)
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" HP)
 
Characterizing Nanoparticles used in Bio Applications
Characterizing Nanoparticles used in Bio ApplicationsCharacterizing Nanoparticles used in Bio Applications
Characterizing Nanoparticles used in Bio Applications
 
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" LT)
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" LT)NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" LT)
NTEK Omni-directional Sound Source (4" LT)
 

More from HORIBA Particle

Exosomes: Exploiting the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of Nature’s Bio...
Exosomes: Exploiting the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of Nature’s Bio...Exosomes: Exploiting the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of Nature’s Bio...
Exosomes: Exploiting the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of Nature’s Bio...HORIBA Particle
 
Mastering the Processing Methods of Engineered Particles
Mastering the Processing Methods of Engineered ParticlesMastering the Processing Methods of Engineered Particles
Mastering the Processing Methods of Engineered ParticlesHORIBA Particle
 
Modern Particle Characterization Techniques Series I: Introduction
Modern Particle Characterization Techniques Series I: IntroductionModern Particle Characterization Techniques Series I: Introduction
Modern Particle Characterization Techniques Series I: IntroductionHORIBA Particle
 
Concentration and Size of Viruses and Virus-like Particles
Concentration and Size of Viruses and Virus-like ParticlesConcentration and Size of Viruses and Virus-like Particles
Concentration and Size of Viruses and Virus-like ParticlesHORIBA Particle
 
The Value of Real-time Imaging: Integrating Particle Size Analysis onto Fluid...
The Value of Real-time Imaging: Integrating Particle Size Analysis onto Fluid...The Value of Real-time Imaging: Integrating Particle Size Analysis onto Fluid...
The Value of Real-time Imaging: Integrating Particle Size Analysis onto Fluid...HORIBA Particle
 
How and Why to Analyze Ceramic Powder Particles
How and Why to Analyze Ceramic Powder ParticlesHow and Why to Analyze Ceramic Powder Particles
How and Why to Analyze Ceramic Powder ParticlesHORIBA Particle
 
Interpreting Laser Diffraction Results for Non-Spherical Particles
Interpreting Laser Diffraction Results for Non-Spherical ParticlesInterpreting Laser Diffraction Results for Non-Spherical Particles
Interpreting Laser Diffraction Results for Non-Spherical ParticlesHORIBA Particle
 
Particle Classroom Series VI: Method Development
Particle Classroom Series VI: Method DevelopmentParticle Classroom Series VI: Method Development
Particle Classroom Series VI: Method DevelopmentHORIBA Particle
 
Particle Classroom Series V: Sampling and Dispersion
Particle Classroom Series V: Sampling and DispersionParticle Classroom Series V: Sampling and Dispersion
Particle Classroom Series V: Sampling and DispersionHORIBA Particle
 
Particle Size Analyses of Polydisperse Liposome Formulations with Multispectr...
Particle Size Analyses of Polydisperse Liposome Formulations with Multispectr...Particle Size Analyses of Polydisperse Liposome Formulations with Multispectr...
Particle Size Analyses of Polydisperse Liposome Formulations with Multispectr...HORIBA Particle
 
Principio, Optimización y Aplicaciones del Análisis de seguimiento de Nanopar...
Principio, Optimización y Aplicaciones del Análisis de seguimiento de Nanopar...Principio, Optimización y Aplicaciones del Análisis de seguimiento de Nanopar...
Principio, Optimización y Aplicaciones del Análisis de seguimiento de Nanopar...HORIBA Particle
 
Particle Classroom Series III: Refractive Index and Laser Diffraction
Particle Classroom Series III: Refractive Index and Laser DiffractionParticle Classroom Series III: Refractive Index and Laser Diffraction
Particle Classroom Series III: Refractive Index and Laser DiffractionHORIBA Particle
 
How to Present and Compare Data Obtained by Particle Tracking Analysis and Ot...
How to Present and Compare Data Obtained by Particle Tracking Analysis and Ot...How to Present and Compare Data Obtained by Particle Tracking Analysis and Ot...
How to Present and Compare Data Obtained by Particle Tracking Analysis and Ot...HORIBA Particle
 
Why the University of Washington chose the HORIBA Laser Scattering Particle S...
Why the University of Washington chose the HORIBA Laser Scattering Particle S...Why the University of Washington chose the HORIBA Laser Scattering Particle S...
Why the University of Washington chose the HORIBA Laser Scattering Particle S...HORIBA Particle
 
Particle Classroom Series II: The Basics of Laser Diffraction
Particle Classroom Series II: The Basics of Laser DiffractionParticle Classroom Series II: The Basics of Laser Diffraction
Particle Classroom Series II: The Basics of Laser DiffractionHORIBA Particle
 
Particle Classroom Series I: Introduction to Particle Analysis
Particle Classroom Series I: Introduction to Particle AnalysisParticle Classroom Series I: Introduction to Particle Analysis
Particle Classroom Series I: Introduction to Particle AnalysisHORIBA Particle
 
Improved Visualization, Counting and Sizing of Polydisperse Nanoparticle Coll...
Improved Visualization, Counting and Sizing of Polydisperse Nanoparticle Coll...Improved Visualization, Counting and Sizing of Polydisperse Nanoparticle Coll...
Improved Visualization, Counting and Sizing of Polydisperse Nanoparticle Coll...HORIBA Particle
 
Key Points to Achieving Successful Laser Diffraction Method Development
Key Points to Achieving Successful Laser Diffraction Method DevelopmentKey Points to Achieving Successful Laser Diffraction Method Development
Key Points to Achieving Successful Laser Diffraction Method DevelopmentHORIBA Particle
 
Particle Size Analysis for Homogenization Process Development
Particle Size Analysis for Homogenization Process Development Particle Size Analysis for Homogenization Process Development
Particle Size Analysis for Homogenization Process Development HORIBA Particle
 

More from HORIBA Particle (20)

Exosomes: Exploiting the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of Nature’s Bio...
Exosomes: Exploiting the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of Nature’s Bio...Exosomes: Exploiting the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of Nature’s Bio...
Exosomes: Exploiting the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of Nature’s Bio...
 
Mastering the Processing Methods of Engineered Particles
Mastering the Processing Methods of Engineered ParticlesMastering the Processing Methods of Engineered Particles
Mastering the Processing Methods of Engineered Particles
 
Modern Particle Characterization Techniques Series I: Introduction
Modern Particle Characterization Techniques Series I: IntroductionModern Particle Characterization Techniques Series I: Introduction
Modern Particle Characterization Techniques Series I: Introduction
 
Concentration and Size of Viruses and Virus-like Particles
Concentration and Size of Viruses and Virus-like ParticlesConcentration and Size of Viruses and Virus-like Particles
Concentration and Size of Viruses and Virus-like Particles
 
The Value of Real-time Imaging: Integrating Particle Size Analysis onto Fluid...
The Value of Real-time Imaging: Integrating Particle Size Analysis onto Fluid...The Value of Real-time Imaging: Integrating Particle Size Analysis onto Fluid...
The Value of Real-time Imaging: Integrating Particle Size Analysis onto Fluid...
 
How and Why to Analyze Ceramic Powder Particles
How and Why to Analyze Ceramic Powder ParticlesHow and Why to Analyze Ceramic Powder Particles
How and Why to Analyze Ceramic Powder Particles
 
Interpreting Laser Diffraction Results for Non-Spherical Particles
Interpreting Laser Diffraction Results for Non-Spherical ParticlesInterpreting Laser Diffraction Results for Non-Spherical Particles
Interpreting Laser Diffraction Results for Non-Spherical Particles
 
Particle Classroom Series VI: Method Development
Particle Classroom Series VI: Method DevelopmentParticle Classroom Series VI: Method Development
Particle Classroom Series VI: Method Development
 
Particle Classroom Series V: Sampling and Dispersion
Particle Classroom Series V: Sampling and DispersionParticle Classroom Series V: Sampling and Dispersion
Particle Classroom Series V: Sampling and Dispersion
 
Particle Size Analyses of Polydisperse Liposome Formulations with Multispectr...
Particle Size Analyses of Polydisperse Liposome Formulations with Multispectr...Particle Size Analyses of Polydisperse Liposome Formulations with Multispectr...
Particle Size Analyses of Polydisperse Liposome Formulations with Multispectr...
 
Principio, Optimización y Aplicaciones del Análisis de seguimiento de Nanopar...
Principio, Optimización y Aplicaciones del Análisis de seguimiento de Nanopar...Principio, Optimización y Aplicaciones del Análisis de seguimiento de Nanopar...
Principio, Optimización y Aplicaciones del Análisis de seguimiento de Nanopar...
 
BET Theory Explained
BET Theory ExplainedBET Theory Explained
BET Theory Explained
 
Particle Classroom Series III: Refractive Index and Laser Diffraction
Particle Classroom Series III: Refractive Index and Laser DiffractionParticle Classroom Series III: Refractive Index and Laser Diffraction
Particle Classroom Series III: Refractive Index and Laser Diffraction
 
How to Present and Compare Data Obtained by Particle Tracking Analysis and Ot...
How to Present and Compare Data Obtained by Particle Tracking Analysis and Ot...How to Present and Compare Data Obtained by Particle Tracking Analysis and Ot...
How to Present and Compare Data Obtained by Particle Tracking Analysis and Ot...
 
Why the University of Washington chose the HORIBA Laser Scattering Particle S...
Why the University of Washington chose the HORIBA Laser Scattering Particle S...Why the University of Washington chose the HORIBA Laser Scattering Particle S...
Why the University of Washington chose the HORIBA Laser Scattering Particle S...
 
Particle Classroom Series II: The Basics of Laser Diffraction
Particle Classroom Series II: The Basics of Laser DiffractionParticle Classroom Series II: The Basics of Laser Diffraction
Particle Classroom Series II: The Basics of Laser Diffraction
 
Particle Classroom Series I: Introduction to Particle Analysis
Particle Classroom Series I: Introduction to Particle AnalysisParticle Classroom Series I: Introduction to Particle Analysis
Particle Classroom Series I: Introduction to Particle Analysis
 
Improved Visualization, Counting and Sizing of Polydisperse Nanoparticle Coll...
Improved Visualization, Counting and Sizing of Polydisperse Nanoparticle Coll...Improved Visualization, Counting and Sizing of Polydisperse Nanoparticle Coll...
Improved Visualization, Counting and Sizing of Polydisperse Nanoparticle Coll...
 
Key Points to Achieving Successful Laser Diffraction Method Development
Key Points to Achieving Successful Laser Diffraction Method DevelopmentKey Points to Achieving Successful Laser Diffraction Method Development
Key Points to Achieving Successful Laser Diffraction Method Development
 
Particle Size Analysis for Homogenization Process Development
Particle Size Analysis for Homogenization Process Development Particle Size Analysis for Homogenization Process Development
Particle Size Analysis for Homogenization Process Development
 

Recently uploaded

Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationSafe Software
 
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your BrandWordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brandgvaughan
 
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering TipsVertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering TipsMiki Katsuragi
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage CostLeverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage CostZilliz
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubKalema Edgar
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024Stephanie Beckett
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Mark Simos
 
Training state-of-the-art general text embedding
Training state-of-the-art general text embeddingTraining state-of-the-art general text embedding
Training state-of-the-art general text embeddingZilliz
 
Vector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector Databases
Vector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector DatabasesVector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector Databases
Vector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector DatabasesZilliz
 
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!Manik S Magar
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLScyllaDB
 
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxArtificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxhariprasad279825
 
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationMy Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationRidwan Fadjar
 
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks..."LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...Fwdays
 
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupStreamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupFlorian Wilhelm
 
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii SoldatenkoFwdays
 
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Scott Keck-Warren
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
 
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your BrandWordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
 
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering TipsVertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
 
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special EditionDMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
 
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage CostLeverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
 
Training state-of-the-art general text embedding
Training state-of-the-art general text embeddingTraining state-of-the-art general text embedding
Training state-of-the-art general text embedding
 
Vector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector Databases
Vector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector DatabasesVector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector Databases
Vector Databases 101 - An introduction to the world of Vector Databases
 
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
 
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxArtificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
 
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationMy Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
 
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks..."LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
 
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupStreamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
 
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
 
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
 

Advantages of the LA-950 Laser Diffraction PSA

  • 1. LA-950 Laser Diffraction Analyzer mark.bumiller@horiba.com © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 2. Laser Diffraction Particle size 0.01 – 3000 µm © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 3. Low End Sensitivity 30, 40, 50, 70 nm latex standards © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 4. Low End Sensitivity Sensitivity: small particle detection 30 nm silica © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved. 40 nm latex
  • 5. 30 nm Colloidal Silica: DLS Data © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 6. Low End Sensitivity: Pigments 100 40 90 35 80 30 q(%) 25 60 50 20 40 15 30 10 20 5 0 0.010 10 0.100 1.000 Diameter(µm) © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved. 0 10.00 UnderSize(%) 70
  • 7. Low End Sensitivity: Cosmetics Some (unfounded?) concerns with particles <100nm LA-950 good at determining sub 100nm particles Software set to display % under any given size Data shown left is for skin cream and TiO2 suspension See Cosmetics Application Note: © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 8. Monitoring Size Reduction * See http://www.microfluidicscorp.com/ © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 9. Ceria: Before, After Processing Laser diffraction required for before sample © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 10. Liposome: Before, After Processing © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 11. PLA Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery 9 fold increase © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 12. PLA Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery Pure © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved. Spiked with 1 µm PSL
  • 13. Dynamic Range: High end 14 100 90 12 80 10 70 60 q(%) 8 50 6 40 30 4 20 2 10 0 10.00 100.0 1000 Diameter(µm) © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved. 0 3000 Coffee Results
  • 14. Dynamic Range: High end: Soils © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 15. Soils Accessory: Slurry Sampler 15, 30, or 60 position auto sampling Optional magnetic stirrer base plate Sample mixed, removed from cup, delivered to LA-950 for analysis © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 16. Other Liquid Accessories Miniflow 35-55 mL liquid W or w/o ultrasound Fraction Cell 10 or 15 mL liquid Magnetic stirrer Paste Cell Sample pressed between two windows © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 17. Small Sample Volume (MiniFlow) Colloidal Silica (weak scatterer) Median (D50): 35 nm Sample Amount: 132 mg Magnesium Stearate Median (D50): 9.33 μm Sample Amount: 0.165 mg Bio-degradable Polymer Median (D50): 114 μm Sample Amount: 1.29 mg © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 18. Built in Ultrasonic Probe Specifications © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 19. Reproducibility: Dry Powder Feeder Direct flow of powder down to cell rather than turn 90o, then around plastic tube © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 20. Reproducibility: Dry Powder Feeder Automatic control of sample feed rate LA-950 monitors amount of sample supplied by the vibratory feeder. Automatic feed back control keeps constant mass flow rate of powder during measurement This is CRITICAL – More reproducible, robust – No ghost peaks – No cutting off results © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 21. Reproducibility – Mg Stearate Dry © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 22. Unique Software features “Multifunctions” To compute individual distribution size from multimodal sample distribution © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 23. Unique Software features  Method expert function  To study and develop method conditions  Search of best analytical conditions (pump speed, acquisition time, us time power….)  Search of best calculation conditions (Refractive Indexes)  Set a Navigation program including all improved parameters © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 24. Unique Software features  Analytical conditions  Calculation conditions View Method Expert webinar on website (Download Center) © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 25. Automated RI computation  Real part study  Need to fix imaginary part  Set up to 5 real parts  Software will compute all RI and display R parameter variation with RI selection © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 26. Automated RI computation  Imaginary part study  Need to fix real part  Set up to 5 imaginary parts  Software will compute all RI and display R parameter variation with RI selection © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 27. Automated RI computation “Method Expert”- Final RI study © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 28. Accuracy: Error Calculations Emulsion Sample Figure 3 yi y (xi) i N The measured scattered light at each channel (i) of the detector. The calculated scattered light at each channel (i) of the detector based on the chosen refractive index kernel and reported particle size distribution. The standard deviation of the scattered light intensity at each channel (i) of the detector. A larger i indicates lower reliability of the signal on a given detector. The number of detectors used for the calculation © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 29. Specifications:Accuracy and Precision LOW ACCURACY LOW PRECISION LOW ACCURACY HIGH PRECISION HIGH ACCURACY LOW PRECISION HIGH ACCURACY HIGH PRECISION (A) Low accuracy, low precision measurements form a diffuse, off-center cluster; (B) Low accuracy, high precision measurements form a tight off-center cluster; (C) High accuracy, low precision measurements form a cluster that is evenly distributed but distant from the center of the target; (D) High Accuracy, high precision measurements are clustered in the center of the target. © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 30. Accuracy Comparison to referee technique Microscope (image analysis) is referee technique for particle characterization Challenged with particle size standards Monodisperse latex spheres – Verifies optics – May pass even if problems with sampler Polydisperse glass spheres – Verifies complete system – Should find problems with samplers © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 31. Accuracy Verification following accepted practices using polydisperse standards: ISO13320 and USP <429> – D50 deviates < 3% from certified range – D10 & D90 deviate < 5% AND – COV D50 < 3% – COV D10 & D90 < 5% Note: Coefficient of Variation = (standard deviation/mean)*100 also called RSD © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 32. Accuracy Test: PS202 PS202 (3-30µm) D10 D50 D90 Standard Value (µm) 9.14 13.43 20.34 Uncertainty (µm) 0.86 0.86 1.44 5% 3% 5% Lower limit (µm) 7.866 12.193 17.955 Measured Result (µm) 9.721 13.916 18.959 10.500 14.719 22.869 ISO standard error Upper Limit (µm) © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 33. Accuracy Test: PS 225 PS225 (50-350µm) D50 D90 Standard Value (µm) 93.7 150.5 238.8 Uncertainty (µm) 3.54 2.52 6.02 ISO standard error 5% 3% 5% Lower limit (µm) 85.652 143.541 221.141 Measured Result (µm) 94.217 153.815 252.542 Upper Limit (µm) © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved. D10 102.102 157.611 257.061
  • 34. Accuracy Test: PS 181 PS181 (0.1-1µm) D50 D90 Standard Value (µm) 0.36 0.65 1.11 Uncertainty (µm) 0.06 0.06 0.13 ISO standard error 5% 3% 5% Lower limit (µm) 0.285 0.5723 0.931 Measured Result (µm) 0.434 0.709 1.296 Upper Limit (µm) © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved. D10 0.441 0.7313 1.302
  • 35. Mix of 50/50 PS202 & 225 Excellent baseline resolution: 48/52 calculated proportions © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 36. Mixed Standards 5 parts PS225 to 1 part PS202 5 parts PS225 to 1 part PS181 © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 37. Resolution  Ability to measure small differences in particle size  Small differences between successive samples (different production lots) are most important  Detection limit of small amount of material outside of main size distribution  Best defined by user’s real-world requirements © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 38. Resolution  Resolve size difference between two materials of similar size.  552nm and 600nm PSL  Can separate peaks when measured separately  Would merge into one peak if measured together © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 39. Resolution: Small Particles 83nm, 204nm, 503nm PSL Resolution of multiple modes in a single sample. © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 40. Resolution: Large Particles 100µm, 200µm, 400µm glass beads Resolution of multiple modes in a single sample. © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 41. Resolution: Small Amount of Second Peak  0.1 micron silica material  2% by weight of ~1 micron quartz standard added © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 42. Precision (Repeatability) Repeatability: Measuring the same sample multiple times as it recirculates within the system 24 Samplings of Polystyrene Latex 30 25 Frequency % 20 15 10 5 -5 0. 19 7 0. 25 8 0. 33 9 0. 44 5 0. 58 3 0. 76 5 1. 00 4 1. 31 8 1. 72 9 2. 26 8 2. 97 6 3. 90 4 5. 12 2 6. 71 9 8. 81 5 0. 15 0. 11 4 0 Size (microns) © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 43. LA-950 Accuracy & Precision Data Accuracy and Precision for PSL Standards Standard value 102nm 491nm 1.02um 12.01um 102um 1004um Tolerance 3nm 4nm 0.022um 0.07um 1.4um 14um 1 104.41 489.41 1.021 11.97 102.64 1001.14 2 104.39 489.28 1.019 11.97 102.66 1000.20 3 104.39 490.24 1.019 11.97 102.73 1001.49 4 104.33 489.52 1.021 11.96 102.70 1001.28 5 104.38 489.55 1.019 11.97 102.73 1000.14 6 104.36 489.52 1.021 11.97 102.74 1000.27 7 104.36 489.50 1.019 11.97 102.76 1001.67 8 104.35 489.91 1.021 11.96 102.74 1001.22 9 104.37 488.99 1.021 11.97 102.74 1000.76 10 104.34 489.68 1.021 11.97 102.76 1000.45 Average 104.37 489.56 1.020 11.97 102.72 1000.86 Std. Dev. 0.024 0.321 0.001 0.004 0.039 0.540 CV 0.02% 0.07% 0.10% 0.03% 0.04% 0.05% © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 44. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA): BCR-66* Summary of Fit Rsquare Adj Rsquare Root Mean Square Error Mean of Response Observations BCR-66 10% 0.46 0.45 0.44 0.43 0.42 0.41 0.4 EVD70000 H000DU07 Serial Number Each Pair Student's t 0.05 1.23 BCR-66 50% 1.2 1.17 1.14 1.11 1.08 1.05 1.02 EVD70000 H000DU07 Serial Number Each Pair Student's t 0.05 2.45 BCR-66 90% 2.4 2.35 2.3 2.25 2.2 2.15 2.1 10% 0.02698 -0.03384 0.02654 0.4356 18 50% 0.03032 -0.03029 0.01566 1.1276 18 90% 0.02330 -0.03775 0.07936 2.2553 18 t Test Difference Std Err Dif Upper CL Dif Lower CL Dif Confidence t Ratio DF Prob > |t| 10% 0.00833 0.01251 0.03486 -0.01819 0.95 0.6660 16 0.5149 50% 0.00522 0.00738 0.02088 -0.01043 0.95 0.7072 16 0.4896 90% 0.02311 0.03741 0.1024 -0.05619 0.95 0.6178 16 0.5454 Tool Difference EVD70000 H000DU07 Grand Mean Difference of Tools % Difference Tolerance Level 0.47 10% 0.4314 0.4398 0.4356 -0.00833 -1.91% 50% 1.1250 1.1302 1.1276 -0.00522 -0.46% ±10% 90% 2.2438 2.2669 2.2553 -0.02311 -1.02% 2.05 EVD70000 H000DU07 Serial Number © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved. Each Pair Student's t 0.05 *see AN146 LA-950 Repeatability Study on www.horiba.com
  • 45. Reproducibility Prepare sample, measure, drain, repeat What would be good reproducibility? Test COV according to ISO13320 CV < 3% at D50 CV < 5% at D10 & D 90 Double values if D50 <10 m Test COV according to USP<429> CV < 10% at D50 CV < 15% at D10 & D 90 Double values if D50 <10 m © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 46. Automatic Reproducibility Calculations  ISO13320-1-1999 “Particle size analysis — Laser diffraction methods — Part 1: General principles  EP 2.9.31 “Laser Diffraction Measurement of Particle Size”; Lead for this monograph  Appearance in Pharmacopeial Forum 28, Number 3 2002  Now in USP 28, NF25 – in Stage 4 of the harmonization process with the EP and the JP © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 47. Software Automation © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 48. Qualification: Accuracy and Repeatability  Use polydisperse standard  Three independent measurements, calculate mean  X50 <3% “certified range of values”  X10 & X90 < 5% “certified range of values”  Also check repeatability  COV X50 < 3%  COV X10 & X90 < 5% See Verification webinar on website © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 49. Software Automation © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 50. Qualification in Practice © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 51. Accuracy & Precision Specifications Accuracy – Guaranteed! •+/- 0.6% on NIST-traceable polystyrene latex calibration standards •3% on d50 (median) for broad-distribution glass bead standards •5% on d10 and d90 for broad-distribution glass bead standards Meets or exceeds all requirements of ISO 13320 and USP 429 Precision – 0.1% The combination of a rigid optical bench, stable, high-intensity light sources, optimized detectors, and highly-refined electronics virtually eliminates variability in the background noise and fluctuations in the response of the instrument. The Partica LA-950 has a guaranteed precision of 0.1% on polystyrene latex calibration standards © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 52. Instrument to Instrument Variation Minimized Instrument to Instrument Variation As a result of each instrument being extremely accurate and precise, the variation in results from instrument to instrument is decreased. This is particularly important when multiple units are installed at different production facilities or when comparing data from supplier to customer. Sample CV D10 CV D50 CV D90 PS202 (3-30µm) 2% 1% 2% PS213 (10-100µm) 2% 2% 2% PS225 (50-350µm) 1% 1% 1% PS235 (150-650µm) 1% 1% 2% PS240 (500-2000µm) 3% 2% 2% All samples measured on 20 different instruments © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 53. Customer Data: Intermediate Precision 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved. Design of Intermediate Precision Experiments N = 6 Assays Day-1 Analyst-1 Instrument-1 N = 6 Assays Day-1 Analyst-2 Instrument-1 N = 6 Assays Day-1 Analyst-1 Instrument-2 N = 6 Assays Day-1 Analyst-2 Instrument-2 N = 6 Assays Day-2 Analyst-1 Instrument-1 N = 6 Assays Day-2 Analyst-2 Instrument-1 N = 6 Assays Day-2 Analyst-1 Instrument-2 N = 6 Assays Day-2 Analyst-2 Instrument-2
  • 54. Customer Data: LA-910 Intermediate Precision Analyst 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Day 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Instr.# 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 Grand RSD Replicate Dmean (nm) D5(nm) 1 107 45 2 107 45 3 106 45 4 107 45 5 106 45 6 103 45 1 102 44 2 101 44 3 101 44 4 100 44 5 101 44 6 98 44 1 108 45 2 108 45 3 106 45 4 107 45 5 107 45 6 106 45 1 103 44 2 103 44 3 102 44 4 102 44 5 102 44 6 101 44 1 107 45 2 107 45 3 105 45 4 106 45 5 106 45 6 106 45 1 102 44 2 100 44 3 100 44 4 100 44 5 100 44 6 99 44 1 109 45 2 108 45 3 107 45 4 106 45 5 106 45 6 106 45 1 103 44 2 104 44 3 103 44 4 102 44 5 101 44 6 101 44 © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved. D10(nm) 56 56 56 56 55 55 53 53 53 53 53 53 56 56 56 56 56 56 53 53 53 53 53 53 55 55 55 55 55 55 53 53 53 53 53 53 56 56 56 55 55 56 54 53 53 53 54 54 D50(nm) 95 95 94 95 94 93 88 87 87 87 87 87 96 96 95 95 95 95 89 88 89 88 88 88 94 94 93 93 93 93 88 87 87 86 87 87 97 96 95 94 94 94 89 89 88 88 88 89 D90(nm) 171 171 168 170 169 163 165 163 162 161 161 152 172 171 168 169 169 168 166 167 165 164 164 163 172 173 168 170 171 169 164 161 158 158 159 157 176 174 170 169 170 169 165 169 167 165 162 161 D95(nm) 211 210 206 209 208 195 200 206 202 201 202 188 212 210 205 208 208 206 211 210 207 206 206 205 214 216 207 212 213 208 209 202 198 199 200 197 216 214 208 208 209 207 209 217 212 210 203 200 Dmean (nm) D5(nm) Average 104 45 STDEV 3.0 0.5 % RSD 2.8 1.1 RSD limit 6% 10% Grand RSD D10(nm) D50(nm) 54 91 1.3 3.5 2.4 3.9 10% 6% D90(nm) 166 5.0 3.0 10% D95(nm) 207 5.8 2.8 10%
  • 55. Instrument to instrument variability: LA-910 6-8 Instruments: Formulation Dmean sd (nm) A 2.8 B 4.5 C 9.5 D 10.6 E 8.7 F 9.2 © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved. D10 sd (nm) 2.1 7.1 6.5 7.9 5.4 10.0 D50 sd (nm) 3.5 4.7 9.5 10.1 8.7 9.5 D90 sd (nm) 2.1 6.9 12.2 18.2 19.4 14.6 Dmean rsd (%) 2.8 2.6 6.1 5.9 5.4 6.0 D10 rsd (%) 3.4 6.0 6.5 7.0 5.5 10.7 D50 rsd (%) 3.6 2.8 6.5 5.9 5.7 6.6 D90 rsd (%) 1.5 2.9 5.4 7.0 8.1 6.4
  • 56. Customer Data: LA-950 Precision LA-950 # 1: Formulation 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Average Std Dev RSD Dmean 156 155 155 156 154 155 155 0.8 0.5 D5 113 112 112 113 111 112 112 0.8 0.7 D10 120 119 119 119 119 119 119 0.5 0.4 D50 154 153 153 154 152 152 153 1.0 0.6 D90 195 194 194 195 193 194 194 0.8 0.4 D95 209 208 208 209 207 208 208 0.7 0.4 Dmean 154 154 155 155 154 155 155 0.5 0.3 D5 112 112 113 113 112 112 112 0.5 0.5 D10 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 0.0 0.0 D50 152 152 152 152 152 153 152 0.6 0.4 D90 192 192 192 193 193 193 192 0.3 0.1 D95 208 208 208 208 207 208 208 0.5 0.3 LA-950 #2: Formulation 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Average Std Dev RSD © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 57. Instrument to instrument variability: LA-950 4 Instruments: Formulation 1 Average (nm) Std Dev (nm) RSD (%) Dmean 155 0.8 0.5 D5 112 0.8 0.7 D10 119 0.7 0.6 D50 152 1.0 0.6 D90 193 1.1 0.6 D95 208 0.7 0.3 Formulation 2 Average (nm) Std Dev (nm) RSD (%) Dmean 193 1.5 0.8 D5 136 0.5 0.4 D10 147 0.4 0.3 D50 187 0.6 0.3 D90 247 0.4 0.2 D95 264 1.1 0.4 © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 58. Reliability and Support  LA-950 (V1) launched in 2004, hundreds of installations, not a single light source or detector failure yet  Full applications support worldwide  Application labs in US (x2), France, Germany, Japan (x2), Singapore, China (x2), Korea  Two day hands-on training course in NJ and CA  Web based training – all lectures from 2 day diffraction training course  HORIBA: a brand you can trust © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 59. Conclusions Most advanced laser diffraction analyzer available LA-950 publishes most detailed performance specifications Best small particle sensitivity High performance across entire dynamic range: wet and dry Most automated software to test both accuracy and reproducibility © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • 60. Q&A Ask a question at labinfo@horiba.com Keep reading the monthly HORIBA Particle e-mail newsletter! Visit the Download Center to find the video and slides from this webinar. © 2011 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Editor's Notes

  1. The graph in the upper left shows that using a light source with a 650 nm wavelength there is no difference in the scattering patterns between a 0.05 and 0.07 µm particle. The graph in the upper right shows how there is a difference in the scattering patterns when using a 405 nm wavelength light source. Since there is a difference in the scattering pattern, we can distinguish between to two particle sizes. The graph to the lower left shows results when 30, 40, 50, and 70 nm latex standards are measured (individually) on the LA-950.
  2. The LA-950 can accurately detect particles as small as the 40 nm latex shown on the left, and the 30 nm Ludox silica on the right. The Ludox is the sample we use to verfiy performance of the DT-1200 system. It is well characterized and accepted as being 30 nm in size. The LA-950 has the best small particle detection performance of any laser diffraction particle size analyzer.
  3. This is the training screen when installing the DT-1200, showing the expected 30 nm result on the right.
  4. The LA-950 also has excellent performance measuring large particles – typically dry powders. The graph on the top shows the data from the coffee application note. Anything over 2000 µm would be missed by the MS2000. The data below from the brochure shows data for 2700 µm alumina balls. Powder samples with any fine particles (&lt;20 µm) are analyzed on the MS2000 using “Fine Powder Mode”. This cuts off ALL data above 250 µm. Otherwise many samples include ghost peaks around 1000-2000 µm. If Fine powder mode is used, the customer will never see any particles &gt;250 µm even if they are really there.
  5. The PowderJet dry powder feeder is a superior sampler than the Sirocco in many ways. The sample flow path is straight down from the nozzle through the cell where the measurement is made. With the Sirocco the powder makes a 90 degree turn within the sampler, then transport via a tube to the cell (possible cross contamination). 2. The PowderJet maintains a constant mass flow rate by varying the feed rate to keep transmission constant. The Sirocco only controls the vibration feed rate. The sample concentration changes dramatically – decreasing the robustness of the measurement. See next slide.
  6. If there are particles &lt; 20 micron in the sample Malvern uses the fine powder powder. When the MS2000 uses Fine Powder mode, it cuts off all data above 250 micron.
  7. This is real world data running a pharmaceutical excipient – magnesium stearate. Note the COV levels are extremely low, all fractions of a percent.
  8. The LA-950 provides two error calculations Residual R and chi square. Both provide information of how the final calculation matches the raw data – a good indicator of how good the RI choice was. The chi square calculation also includes    –
  9. Results from analyzing the Whitehouse PS202 polydisperse standard. Great results.
  10. Results from analyzing the Whitehouse PS225 polydisperse standard. Great results.
  11. Results from analyzing the Whitehouse PS181 polydisperse standard. Great results.
  12. These results come from mixing 2 standards 50/50 – good resolution and assignment of proportions.
  13. More data showing the ability to resolve peaks with accurate proportions.
  14. Resolution is the ability of the instrument to measure small differences in particle sizes. Resolution is difficult to specify, because it can have many possible meanings. In the case of the user, it would be most important to test a series of samples that track the variables of interest used to characterize the performance of the instrument for that specific use.
  15. Perhaps the most important measure of resolution is how small a difference in the sample itself will generate a difference in the measurement. These changes may come from additional processing (milling or agglomeration) or to differentiate between different batches of material. Polystyrene Latex (PSL) NIST traceable standards are the easiest standards to use, but are significantly different from a vast majority of the materials manufactured and used in industry. This example does show the ability of the instrument to differentiate between a 553nm and a 600nm material.
  16. This is an example of a mixture of three distinctly different size materials. Can the instrument identify that there are distinct distributions within the total sample? If so, are the relative amounts of the different components reported properly? Some companies have focused on tests to show closely spaced polystyrene latex as individual peaks in the overall distribution. As this example shows, it is possible, but the user must decide if this is a valid test of the ability of the instrument to respond to their samples.
  17. This is another example of a mixture of three distinctly different size materials, but at a much larger size range. Instrument response can vary over the measurement range. Experiments should be designed to characterize performance in the range of the final application.
  18. Resolution can also be the ability of the instrument to determine small amounts of a material outside of the main range of the sample, whether larger or smaller. A small amount of fines or coarse material can be a very important indicator of process problems. The ability to respond to these small amounts of material before they become a large contributor to the total particle distribution is a very important feature.
  19. Precision is the ability of the instrument to get the same answer for the same material in repeat tests. The data shown was 24 samplings on one instrument. The data shows the precision of both sampling and instrument. Repeat measurements of the same sample in the instrument would characterize the precision of this one instrument.
  20. USP &lt;429&gt; is a new pharmaceutical standard for using laser diffraction. This test has many similarities to ISO13320.
  21. The USP &lt;429&gt; calculations are being written into the LA=-950 software. When released the user will have automatic pass/fail calculations and displays.
  22. USP &lt;429&gt; also sets pass/fail criteria when analyzing a polydisperse standard to determine if the system is working properly. Measure the sample 3 times – to pass the accuracy the d50 must be within 3% of the certified value, and the d10&amp;d90 must be within 5%. In addition, the test requires the user to calculate the COV for the 3 measurements and sets repeatability goals as shown in the slide.
  23. This is just a screen shot from the development of the USP software. Customers will be able to choose from three options: Comply with USP&lt;429&gt; requirements Comply with ISO13320 requirements (more strict) Or create custom user defined requirements. This is why all customers will benefit from the software features.
  24. Here is a screen shot form the software development showing an example where the accuracy was tested using a standard. The system passed at the d10&amp;d90, but failed at the d50. This just an example, of course the units normally pass this test – see next slides.
  25. Here are the accuracy &amp; precision specifications for the LA-950, along with example data in the next slide. Does the competition talk about their specifications?
  26. Here is data from 20 LA-950’s testing the instrument to instrument variation using polydisperse standards. Excellent results.
  27. The last slides comes from customer data. They wanted to compare the reproducibility of the LA-910 to LA-950. This slide shows the protocol for testing the precision.
  28. Here is the precision data for the LA-910. Two instruments were used in this study as shown in the protocol on the previous slide. Note: %RSD is the same as COV, just another name for the same calculation. These values are acceptable and would pass the USP&lt;429&gt; requirements.
  29. Here is data from 6-8 different LA-910’s, testing instrument to instrument variability. This data is again acceptable.
  30. Next, a similar study was performed using 2 LA-950’s. Notice the extremely low RSD values. EXCELLENT!
  31. Finally, a study was performed on 4 LA-950’s. Notice the excellent RSD values. We expect this is the best in the business.