10. 10
Experimental Protocol
How Effective Our Method is
Participants
8 people; age: 18~25
Experimental Procedure
Continue to shoot for 30s
the sphere moving within
the projected area
11. 11
Experimental Protocol
Experimental method list
A) Proposed Method
B) Proposed Method +50mm (x)
C) Proposed Method -50mm (x)
H) Without Proposed Method
B and C are given error values to the proposed method.
H is not using the proposed method.
A
B
C
F
F
n
l
L
x
θa
θb
camera
mc
mf
How Effective Our Method is
12. 12
Quantitative Evaluation
Acceleration sensor fixed to the camera
Start End
Trajectory of a sphere projected on a wall
iPhone6 as an Acceleration Sensor
Comparing camera shake by acceleration value
How Effective Our Method is
15. 15
Qualitative Evaluation
Q1: This method is easy to take photos.
Q2: You feel this method is stable.
Q3: You feel tired when using this shooting method.
Q4: This method is designed to personalize your body.
Q5: How enjoyable it this method?
Q6: How stressed when you are took in this way?
Question List (Likert Scale)
How Effective Our Method is
16. 16
Q1
Q2
Q3
1 2 3 4 5
Q4
Q5
Q6
This method is easy
to take photos.
You feel this method
is stable.
You feel tired when
using this shooting method.
This method is designed to
personalize your body.
How enjoyable it this method?.
How stressed when
you are took in this way?
!
"
#
$
!
"
#
$
!
"
#
$
!
"
#
$
!
"
#
$
!
"
#
$
SDM
Strongly disagree Neutral Strongly agree
H
A
B
C
H
A
B
C
H
A
B
C
H
A
B
C
H
A
B
C
H
A
B
C
Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed.
Statistically significant difference was only
found between C and H in Q6.
Self-attribution tends to be higher if fixed
as in the proposed method.
Qualitative Evaluation
How Effective Our Method is
17. 17
Study01: Summary
No Stabilizer, No Unblurry Video
Quantitative
It is less likely to blur on hand than this method.
Qualitative
Self-attribution is enhanced by the fixation
mechanism.
Positive response for personalization with this
method.
18. 18
Study01: Problem
No Stabilizer, No Unblurry Video
1.Low durability because of the property of
ready-made goods
2.Low adaptability for physically characterized
people
3.Low stabilizing ability
19. 19
Study01: Problem
No Stabilizer, No Unblurry Video
1.Low durability because of the property of
ready-made goods
2.Low adaptability for physically characterized
people
3.Low stabilizing ability
→All 3D Printed
→Modify Optimization Method
→Update Stabilization Mechanism
22. 22
Re-Design Process
camera
Define Parameters
along Force Equations
Topology Optimization
Pitch Directional Stabilization
First Approach
Advanced Approach
3D Printing
Assemble
Ready-Made Parts
Renew Our Design Process
All 3D Printed
Parts
3D Printed Objects
with Ready-Made Parts