Validation Belgium France

337 views
308 views

Published on

Published in: Education, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
337
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Validation Belgium France

  1. 1. Product Validation Process (Equal) in French-speaking Belgium Evaluation and Future Challenges Lisbon, 27 october 2008 European Social Fund Agency
  2. 4. Evaluation of the Process <ul><li>Some Figures </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Participation of 32 out 35 DPs; </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>27 flagship products presented (in 3 sessions) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>5 concerning enhanced efficiency of the job market; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>9 concerning the reinforcement of equal opportunities on the job market; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>9 concerning the reinforcement and upgrading of skills; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>4 concerning activity creation guidance. </li></ul></ul></ul></ul>
  3. 5. Validated Product Characteristics <ul><ul><li>Legible and comprehensible (qualitative leap in relation to Equal 1); </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Subject of good communication (oral and written); </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Different degree of outcome because contingency-related (Project lifecycle, financing etc) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Product’s creative process not be neglected (Innovation). </li></ul></ul>
  4. 6. Development Partnerships Opinion <ul><ul><ul><li>Validation Contributions : </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Critical distancing from the project in question; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Opportunities for meeting and exchanging ideas; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Validation methodology; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Visibility among the political authorities; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Legitimacy in a sector; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Stimulation and contribution of new ideas; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Formalisation of the work in question; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Work on the communication of the product. </li></ul></ul></ul></ul>
  5. 7. <ul><ul><ul><li>Methodological Monitoring Contributions : </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Interest of the individual monitoring; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Interest of the preparative validation workshops; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Stimulation of the validation sessions. </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Points to be improved in the Monitoring : </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Project guidance time (limited) </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Communication of the results </li></ul></ul></ul></ul>
  6. 8. <ul><ul><ul><li>Future Improvement Avenues : </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Lightening of the mechanism; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Involvement of the beneficiaries; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Enhanced involvement of the political authorities; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Better feedback; </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Voluntary basis. </li></ul></ul></ul></ul>
  7. 10. Future Challenges <ul><li>Roll-out to all ESF projects; </li></ul><ul><li>Limited budget; </li></ul><ul><li>Mid-course evaluation; </li></ul><ul><li>Concentration of the validation on pilot projects (3 years); </li></ul><ul><li>Voluntary basis; </li></ul><ul><li>Self-evaluation, written and oral presentations maintained; </li></ul><ul><li>Thematic validation with peer supervision; </li></ul><ul><li>Permanent jury at the validation sessions; </li></ul><ul><li>Creation of a validated product database; </li></ul><ul><li>Work on political authority awareness; </li></ul><ul><li>Adjustment of deadlines. </li></ul>
  8. 11. <ul><li>Any question ? </li></ul><ul><li>www.fse.be </li></ul>

×