Walking the walk - the practical experience of Web2 in research
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Walking the walk - the practical experience of Web2 in research

on

  • 7,475 views

Talk given at the e-science meeting on Web2 in research. Focuses on a couple of case studies trying to draw out what makes an effective and successful Web2 service for researchers.

Talk given at the e-science meeting on Web2 in research. Focuses on a couple of case studies trying to draw out what makes an effective and successful Web2 service for researchers.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
7,475
Views on SlideShare
6,926
Embed Views
549

Actions

Likes
29
Downloads
81
Comments
2

26 Embeds 549

http://localhost 230
http://scienceroll.com 101
http://miningdrugs.blogspot.com 54
http://test-www.nature.com 46
http://www.nextgenerationscience.com 45
http://sheensharing.wordpress.com 22
http://mndoci.com 15
http://www.slideshare.net 6
http://miningdrugs.blogspot.co.uk 4
http://miningdrugs.blogspot.com.au 3
http://miningdrugs.blogspot.in 3
http://www.squidoo.com 3
http://miningdrugs.blogspot.de 2
http://education.cmb.med.rug.nl 2
http://miningdrugs.blogspot.fr 2
http://www.businessblogs247.com 1
http://miningdrugs.blogspot.be 1
http://miningdrugs.blogspot.jp 1
http://www.bonbudget.com 1
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 1
http://static.slidesharecdn.com 1
http://www.netvibes.com 1
http://miningdrugs.blogspot.ca 1
http://209.85.129.132 1
https://mandev2.blackboard.com 1
http://miningdrugs.blogspot.co.nz 1
More...

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-ShareAlike License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
  • I found a great informative presentation for this 'Walking the walk - '. I am very impressive from this slide presentations. Great Job very nice present information. I like very much this 'Walking the walk - '. I have more interest in archaeology research field. my archaeology research related blog is http://archaeologyexcavations.blogspot.com/
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
  • There is a multimedia recording of the talk available now at:http://redress.lancs.ac.uk/resources/imp_template2.php?creator=Neylon&ti
    tle=web2&resolution=1024x768&speed=LAN
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Walking the walk - the practical experience of Web2 in research Walking the walk - the practical experience of Web2 in research Presentation Transcript

  • Walking the Walk The experience of using Web 2.0 tools in active research projects Cameron Neylon
  • 1. The long tail 2. Data is the next Intel inside 3. Users add value 4. Network effects by default 5. Some rights reserved 6. Perpetual Beta 7. Cooperate don’t control 8. Software above the level of a single device http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html?page=5
  • What does Web 2.0 offer a researcher in practice? http://flickr.com/photos/heymans/480396810/
  • http://tinyurl.com/friendfeed-mthk-request
  • • Open tender and response • Not mass participation or opinion markets • There just aren’t that many researchers • A good community and a well built and cared for network are critical
  • The Polymath Project
  • 27 January 2009 http://gowers.wordpress.com/
  • 27 January 2009 February 1 2009 http://gowers.wordpress.com/
  • 27 January 2009 February 1 2009 March 10 2009 http://gowers.wordpress.com/
  • • Successful project • Small core group of participants • Much larger group of watchers • Concerns over embarrassment, keeping up, mechanisms for giving credit • Issues over management of large numbers of very active threads
  • Open Notebook Challenge
  • http://onschallenge.wikispaces.com/Exp026
  • http://tinyurl.com/ons-challenge-spreadsheet
  • http://oru.edu/cccda/sl/descriptorspace/ds.php
  • http://slurl.com/secondlife/Drexel/165/178/24
  • 113 individual measurements (plus 71 literature values) 14 researchers in four countries One undergraduate chemistry class $6000 funding (for prizes and chemicals)
  • 113 individual measurements (plus 71 literature values) 14 researchers in four countries One undergraduate chemistry class $6000 funding (for prizes and chemicals) Four months One (invited) book chapter submitted Second paper in preparation
  • • Collaboration enabled via open data licensing • Still relatively small numbers of people • Are massive collaborative projects even possible? • 90% aren’t aware of it, 9% are passive watchers • 0.9% make occasional contributions and 0.1% are core players - does that add up to more than one?
  • Galaxy Zoo
  • • Compelling and comprehensible story • Much work gone into building a system that enables people to make a contribution • Responsive and appealing user experience • Still a self selecting community but drawn from a much wider pool
  • Deploying the LaBLog at RAL
  • Screenshot - 26 March
  • • “It’s going to be great but we need to put a lot of work into getting it going...” • “I don’t have the time to put all the stuff in...” • Get what the advantages are but haven’t necessarily bought in to the process • Concerns over data re-use and “scooping”
  • Where does this leave us?
  • 1. The long tail 2. Data is the next Intel inside 3. Users add value 4. Network effects by default 5. Some rights reserved 6. Perpetual Beta 7. Cooperate don’t control 8. Software above the level of a single device http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html?page=5
  • 1. The long tail
  • 1. The long tail ugh eno fat sn’t i unless you w ork real hard at it c.f. galaxy zo o, FoldIt etc .
  • 2. Data is the new Intel inside well duh!
  • nt to a w ou 3. Users add value Y but why do they want t o?
  • 4. Network effects by default
  • 4. Network effects by default SP rU ou sy at’ th if ow ut pn b eu giv en th
  • 5. Some rights reserved licensing matters, even i f everyone thinks it’s bori ng
  • is not an excuse for giving people rubbish 6. Perpetual beta
  • is not an excuse for giving people rubbish 6. Perpetual beta
  • is not an excuse for giving people rubbish 6. Perpetual beta provement continual im
  • ating tegr in in e lies valu l the Al g it ardin n ho not i data, 7. Cooperate don’t control
  • ating tegr in in e lies valu l the Al g it ardin n ho not i data, 7. Cooperate don’t control licensing matters, even i f everyone thinks it’s bori ng
  • ating tegr in in e lies valu l the Al g it ardin n ho not i data, 7. Cooperate don’t control licensing matters, even i f everyone thinks it’s bori ng ecause it ike is bad b share-al perability eaks intero br
  • 8. Software above the level of a single device
  • collaboration 8. Software above the level of a single device
  • collaboration 8. Software above the level of a single device vice ser
  • What are the design patterns for successful research tools?
  • 1. Define and understand your target audience 2. Solve a pressing problem they have or tell them a story they understand and want to contribute to 3. Build the service into an existing workflow or a established framework that the target audience understands 4. Get the licensing right and give users a sense of control over their own data and contribution 5. Build for network effects but don’t rely on them 6. Plan to build (and resource the building of) your community 7. Build for interoperability; technical and legal
  • Friendfeed as a research community
  • http://friendfeed.com
  • http://tinyurl.com/dku869
  • Pulling items from external services via RSS
  • • Aggregating content (solving a problem) • Works without a network; network effects follow • Collecting comments and ratings (data) • Straightforward pumping of data in and pulling it backout via API (licensing, interoperability) • Community, community, community • Building your own network
  • If you just build it they (probably) won’t come
  • If you don’t build it they definitely won’t come
  • The community is more important than the service
  • Researchers are already the tail