7. 4 -4 - 77McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Ability and IntellectAbility and Intellect
Ability
An individual’s capacity to perform
the various tasks in a job.
Intellectual Ability
The capacity to do mental activities.
9. 4 -4 - 99McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Physical AbilitiesPhysical Abilities
The capacity to do tasks
demanding stamina,
dexterity (good physical
coordination ), strength, and
similar characteristics.
21. 4 -4 - 2121McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Basic convictions that a specific mode ofBasic convictions that a specific mode of
conduct or end-state of existence ( a wayconduct or end-state of existence ( a way
of living) is personally or sociallyof living) is personally or socially
preferable (i.e., what is right & good)preferable (i.e., what is right & good)
ValuesValues
22. 4 -4 - 2222McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Types of ValuesTypes of Values
Terminal ValuesTerminal Values
Desirable end-state of existence; the goals that aDesirable end-state of existence; the goals that a
person would like to achieve during his/her lifetime.person would like to achieve during his/her lifetime.
((Desirable End States)Desirable End States)
Instrumental ValuesInstrumental Values
Preferable modes of behavior or means of achievingPreferable modes of behavior or means of achieving
one`s terminal values. (one`s terminal values. (The ways/means for achievingThe ways/means for achieving
one’s terminal values)one’s terminal values)
23. 4 -4 - 2323McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Importance of ValuesImportance of Values
Values are important to the study of OB becauseValues are important to the study of OB because
they lay the foundation for the understanding ofthey lay the foundation for the understanding of
attitudes & motivation & they influence ourattitudes & motivation & they influence our
perceptions.perceptions.
Individuals enter an org. with preconceivedIndividuals enter an org. with preconceived
notions of what “notions of what “oughtought” & what “” & what “ought notought not” to be.” to be.
Of course, these notions are not “Of course, these notions are not “value-freevalue-free”.”.
They contain interpretations of “They contain interpretations of “right & wrongright & wrong”.”.
Furthermore, they imply that certain behaviors areFurthermore, they imply that certain behaviors are
preferred over others. As a result,preferred over others. As a result, values cloudvalues cloud
objectivity & rationalityobjectivity & rationality..
24. 4 -4 - 2424McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Importance of ValuesImportance of Values
Values generally influence attitudes & behavior.Values generally influence attitudes & behavior.
Suppose that you enter an org. with the view thatSuppose that you enter an org. with the view that
““allocating pay on the basis of seniority is wrongallocating pay on the basis of seniority is wrong”.”.
How are you going to react if you find that “How are you going to react if you find that “the org. youthe org. you
have just joined rewards seniority & not performancehave just joined rewards seniority & not performance”?”?
You are likely to be disappointed – and this can lead toYou are likely to be disappointed – and this can lead to
job dissatisfaction & the decision not to exert a highjob dissatisfaction & the decision not to exert a high
level of effort since “level of effort since “ it is probably not going to lead toit is probably not going to lead to
more money, anywaymore money, anyway”.”.
Would your attitudes & behavior be different if yourWould your attitudes & behavior be different if your
values aligned with the org.’s pay policies?values aligned with the org.’s pay policies?
27. 4 -4 - 2727McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Power DistancePower Distance
Individualism vs. CollectivismIndividualism vs. Collectivism
Masculinity vs. FemininityMasculinity vs. Femininity
Uncertainty AvoidanceUncertainty Avoidance
Long-term and Short-termLong-term and Short-term
orientationorientation
Values across Cultures: Hofstede’s FrameworkValues across Cultures: Hofstede’s Framework
28. 4 -4 - 2828McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Power DistanceThe Power Distance
Extent to which a society accepts that
power in institutions and organizations is
distributed unequally.
Low distance: relatively equal power
between those with status/wealth and those
without status/wealth
High distance: extremely unequal power
distribution between those with
status/wealth and those without
status/wealth
29. 4 -4 - 2929McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Individualism Vs CollectivismIndividualism Vs Collectivism
Collectivism
A tight social framework
in which people expect
others in groups of
which they are a part to
look after them and
protect them.
Individualism
The degree to which
people prefer to act as
individuals rather than
a member of groups.
Vs.
30. 4 -4 - 3030McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Masculinity Vs FaminityMasculinity Vs Faminity
Masculinity
The extent to which the
society values work roles of
achievement, power, and
control, and where
assertiveness and materialism
are also valued.
Femininity
The extent to which
there is little
differentiation
between roles for men
and women.
31. 4 -4 - 3131McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Uncertainty AvoidanceUncertainty Avoidance
The extent to which a society feels threatened
by uncertain and ambiguous situations and
have created beliefs & institutions that try to
avoid these. Countries who do not like
uncertainty tend to have high need for security
& a strong belief in experts & their knowledge.
32. 4 -4 - 3232McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Uncertainty AvoidanceUncertainty Avoidance
High Uncertainty Avoidance: Society does not like
ambiguous situations & tries to avoid them. Countries with
this dimension have a great deal of structuring of org.
activities, more written rules, less risk taking by managers,
lower labor turnover, & less ambitious employees.
Low Uncertainty Avoidance: Society does not mind
ambiguous situations & embraces them. Such societies have
orgs. With less structuring of activities, fewer written rules,
more risk taking by managers, higher labor turnover, & more
ambitious employees. Orgs. Encourages personnel to use their
own initiative & assume responsibility for their actions
33. 4 -4 - 3333McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Long-term Vs Short- Term OrientationLong-term Vs Short- Term Orientation
Long-term Orientation
A national culture
attribute that
emphasizes the future,
thrift, and persistence.
Short-term Orientation
A national culture
attribute that emphasizes
the present and the here
and now.
38. 4 -4 - 3838McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
PersonalityPersonality
PersonalityPersonality –– a stable set of characteristicsa stable set of characteristics
and tendencies that determineand tendencies that determine
commonalities and differences in people’scommonalities and differences in people’s
behavior.behavior.
Personality is influenced by:Personality is influenced by:
Hereditary factorsHereditary factors
Cultural factorsCultural factors
Social factorsSocial factors
39. 4 -4 - 3939McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Myers-Briggs Type IndicatorThe Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Personality Types
• Extroverted vs. Introverted (E or I)
• Sensing vs. Intuitive (S or N)
• Thinking vs. Feeling (T or F)
• Judging vs. Perceiving (P or J)
Score is a combination of all four (e.g.,
ENTJ)
Personality Types
• Extroverted vs. Introverted (E or I)
• Sensing vs. Intuitive (S or N)
• Thinking vs. Feeling (T or F)
• Judging vs. Perceiving (P or J)
Score is a combination of all four (e.g.,
ENTJ)
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)
A personality test that taps four characteristics and classifies
people into 1 of 16 personality types.
Home
Assignment
Home
Assignment
40. 4 -4 - 4040McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Some Major Forces Influencing PersonalitySome Major Forces Influencing Personality
TheThe
Individual’sIndividual’s
PersonalityPersonality
Cultural forcesCultural forces
Hereditary forcesHereditary forces
Family relationshipFamily relationship
forcesforces
Social class / groupSocial class / group
membership forcesmembership forces
41. 4 -4 - 4141McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Organizations can develop creativity by:Organizations can develop creativity by:
1.1. Buffering.Buffering. Managers can look for ways toManagers can look for ways to
absorb the risks of creative decisions madeabsorb the risks of creative decisions made
by their employees.by their employees.
2.2. Organizational time-outs.Organizational time-outs. Give peopleGive people
time off to work on a problem and allowtime off to work on a problem and allow
them to think things through.them to think things through.
3.3. Intuition.Intuition. Give half-baked orGive half-baked or
unsophisticated ideas a chance.unsophisticated ideas a chance.
42. 4 -4 - 4242McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Organizations can develop creativity by:Organizations can develop creativity by:
(continued)(continued)
4.4. Innovative attitudes.Innovative attitudes. Encourage everyoneEncourage everyone
to think of ways to solve problems.to think of ways to solve problems.
5.5. Innovative organizational structures.Innovative organizational structures. LetLet
employees see and interact with manyemployees see and interact with many
managers and mentors.managers and mentors.
43. 4 -4 - 4343McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Psychological ContractThe Psychological Contract
An implied understanding ofAn implied understanding of
mutual contributions between amutual contributions between a
person and his or herperson and his or her
organization.organization.
44. 4 -4 - 4444McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Psychological Contract Violations fromPsychological Contract Violations from
Perceptions of EmployeesPerceptions of Employees
Job securityJob security
No such thing as security with good chance ofNo such thing as security with good chance of
layoff or downsizing.layoff or downsizing.
Child-care benefitsChild-care benefits
Failing to provide adequate care and servicesFailing to provide adequate care and services
for child care during working hours on- or off-for child care during working hours on- or off-
site.site.
Job feedbackJob feedback
Poor attention and little effort to providePoor attention and little effort to provide
meaningful job feedback.meaningful job feedback.
45. 4 -4 - 4545McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcGraw-Hill/Irwin
Psychological Contract Violations fromPsychological Contract Violations from
Perceptions of EmployeesPerceptions of Employees (continued)(continued)
Merit-based pay raisesMerit-based pay raises
No relationship between pay and actualNo relationship between pay and actual
performance.performance.
Job autonomyJob autonomy
Failure to permit the employee to have theFailure to permit the employee to have the
freedom to make job-related decisions aboutfreedom to make job-related decisions about
how to perform the job.how to perform the job.
PromotionPromotion
Reneging on a specific promise to provide aReneging on a specific promise to provide a
promotion for excellent performance.promotion for excellent performance.
Editor's Notes
Organizational behavior (OB) is applied behavioral science and, as a result, is built upon contributions from several behavioral disciplines.
Psychology is the science that seeks to measure, explain, and modify human and animal behavior. Psychologists study individual behavior. Those who have contributed to OB are learning theorists, counseling psychologists, and industrial and organizational psychologists.
Sociology studies people in relation to their fellow human beings. Sociology’s greatest contribution to OB has been in the areas of group behavior, work teams, organizational culture, communication, power, status, and conflict.
Social psychology blends the disciplines of sociology and psychology. This discipline has contributed to OB in several ways: measuring, understanding, and changing attitudes, communication patterns, and decision-making processes.
Anthropology is the study of societies to learn about human behavior. Much of our current understanding of organizational culture and differences between national cultures is the result of the work of anthropologists.
Political science is the study of behavior of groups and individuals within a political environment. This discipline has contributed to the understanding of how conflict is structured, power is allocated, and how self-interest is promoted.